Risk factors for development of subaxial subluxations following atlantoaxial arthrodesis for atlantoaxial subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis

Atlantoaxial Instability in the Course of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Selected Parameters of Sagittal Balance

Background: Atlantoaxial instability is the most common cervical instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its course may differ in different patients and may have different degrees of severity and symptoms. Methods: There are a number of studies on systemic factors associated with the development of this instability, but there are few publications in the scientific literature on the influence of biomechanical factors on the development of cervical instability. One of the areas that allows the study of biomechanical factors influencing spine pathologies is the analysis of sagittal balance using radiological parameters. The study of radiological parameters of sagittal balance has contributed to understanding the pathology of selected spine diseases and is currently an indispensable tool in planning surgical treatment. Results: The presented study, conducted on a group of RA patients with cervical instability, was performed to look for a relationship between C1-C2 instability and sagittal balance parameters. Conclusions: Among the examined selected parameters, a statistically relationship between C1-C2 instability and the Cobb angle C1-C7 and OD-HA parameters has been found. This confirms the need for further in-depth research on this areas.

Radiographic Predictors of Subaxial Subluxation After Atlantoaxial Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify preoperative radiographic predictors associated with the development of subaxial subluxation (SAS) after surgery.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of atlantoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability has been increasing. SAS can develop after surgery despite atlantoaxial fusion with the optimal C1-C2 angle. We hypothesized that preoperative discordant angular contribution in the upper and subaxial cervical spine is associated with the occurrence of postoperative SAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for atlantoaxial instability with a minimum 5-year follow-up and control participants were included. The O-C2 angle, C2 slope (C2S), C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), and T1 slope (T1S) were measured. We focused on the angular contribution ratio in the upper cervical spine to the whole CL, and the preoperative C2/T1S ratio was defined as the ratio of C2S to T1S.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (SAS=11, no-SAS=16; mean age, 60.7 y old; 77.8% female; mean follow-up duration, 6.8 y) and 23 demographically matched control participants were enrolled. The SAS onset was at 4.7 postoperative years. Preoperatively, the O-C2 angle, C2-C7 CL, and T1S were comparable between the SAS, no-SAS, and control groups. The preoperative C2S and C2/T1S ratio were smaller in the SAS group than in the no-SAS or control group (C2S, 11.0 vs. 18.4 vs. 18.7 degrees; C2/T1S ratio, 0.49 vs. 0.77 vs. 0.78, P <0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the C2/T1S ratio had higher specificity and similar sensitivity as a predictor of postoperative SAS than C2S (specificity: 0.90 vs. 0.87; sensitivity: 0.73 vs. 0.73). The estimated cutoff values of the C2S and C2/T1S ratio were 14 degrees and 0.58, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative C2/T1S ratio was closely associated with postoperative SAS. Patients with a C2/T1S ratio <0.58 were at a high risk of SAS after atlantoaxial fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Radiological assessment and surgical management of cervical spine involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The purpose of the present systematic review was to describe the diagnostic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis in the cervical spine to provide a better understanding of the indications and options of surgical intervention. We performed a literature review of Pub-med, Embase, and Scopus database. Upon implementing specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, all eligible articles were identified. A total of 1878 patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) were evaluated for cervical spine involvement with plain radiographs. Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) ranged from 16.4 to 95.7% in plain radiographs while sub-axial subluxation ranged from 10 to 43.6% of cases. Anterior atlantodental interval (AADI) was found to between 2.5 mm and 4.61 mm in neutral and flexion position respectively, while Posterior Atlantodental Interval (PADI) was between 20.4 and 24.92 mm. 660 patients with RA had undergone an MRI. A pannus diagnosis ranged from 13.33 to 85.36% while spinal cord compression was reported in 0-13% of cases. When it comes to surgical outcomes, Atlanto-axial joint (AAJ) fusion success rates ranged from 45.16 to 100% of cases. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative subluxation ranged from 0 to 77.7%. With regards to AADI it is evident that its value decreased in all studies. Furthermore, an improvement in Ranawat classification was variable between studies with a report improvement frequency by at least one class ranging from 0 to 54.5%. In conclusion, through careful radiographic and clinical evaluation, cervical spine involvement in patients with RA can be detected. Surgery is a valuable option for these patients and can lead to improvement in their symptoms.

Radiological changes in sagittal parameters after C1-C2 arthrodesis and their clinical correlation: Is there a difference between traumatic and non-traumatic causes?

Background: Compensatory changes in cervical sagittal alignment after C1-C2 arthrodesis have been reported in a few studies. No studies have explored the differences in these compensatory changes between traumatic and non-traumatic pathologies. Conflicting reports exist on the correlation between cervical sagittal parameters and neck pain or function.Methodology: Medical records of 81 consecutive patients [Jan 2010 - Dec 2018] who underwent Harms arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed. 53 patients were included in the final analysis. Radiological parameters [C0-C1, C1-C2, C2-C7 angles and T1 slope] and clinical parameters [VAS (Visual analogue scale) and NDI (Neck disability index)] were compared between the two groups, Group A (traumatic) and Group B (non-traumatic).Results: The 53 patients [Group A (n = 24,) and Group B (n = 29)] had a mean age of 49.98 ± 21.82 years (42 males, 11 females). Mean follow up duration was 48.9 months. Δ C1-C2 angle is significantly correlated with ΔC2-C7 angle (Group A, p = 0.004; Group B, p = 0.015) but not with ΔC0-C1 angle (Group A, p = 0.315; Group B, p = 0.938). Though significant improvement in the clinical parameters (VAS/NDI) has been noted in both groups, Group A showed a greater improvement in VAS scores [Group A, (p < 0.001); Group B, (p < 0.023)].Conclusions: The sub-axial sagittal profile was strongly correlated with the ΔC1-C2 angle in both groups. Group B showed greater changes in sagittal parameters after Harms fixation and Group A showed greater improvement in long-term functional outcomes. The final functional outcomes were not related to the initial or final radiological sagittal profile in both groups.

Relationship between the atlantodental interval and T1 slope after atlantoaxial fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Atlantoaxial fusion has been widely used for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, atlantoaxial fusion sacrifices the motion of atlantoaxial articulation, and postoperative loss of cervical lordosis and aggravation of cervical kyphosis are observed. We investigated various factors under the hypothesis that the atlantodental interval (ADI) and T1 slope may be associated with sagittal alignment after atlantoaxial fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 64 patients with RA who underwent atlantoaxial fusion due to AAI. Radiological factors, including the ADI, T1 slope, Oc-C2 angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and C2-C7 angle, were measured before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The various factors associated with atlantoaxial fusion before and after surgery were compared according to the upper and lower preoperative ADIs. There was a significant difference in the T1 slope 1 year after surgery (p = 0.044) among the patients with lower preoperative ADI values. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative ADI (> 7.92 mm) defined in the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was an independent predictive factor for the increase in the T1 slope 1 year after atlantoaxial fusion (odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-15.73; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

We found an association between the preoperative ADI and difference in the T1 slope after atlantoaxial fusion in the patients with RA. A preoperative ADI (> 7.92 mm) was an independent predictor for the increase in the T1 slope after atlantoaxial fusion. Therefore, performing surgical treatment when the ADI is low would lead to better cervical sagittal alignment.

The Effect of Straight or Lordotic Rods on Cervical Subaxial Alignment While Fusing C1-C2

BACKGROUND

The C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw with rod fixation system has been used commonly in recent years. Despite the numerous reports on this technique in the literature, there are no studies regarding the effect of the angle of the rod used. We investigated the effect of rod angle on subaxial lordosis, cervical sagittal balance, and pain scores.

METHODS

Clinical records and radiologic images of 58 patients who underwent procedures between 2011 and 2016 at our clinic were assessed retrospectively. We recorded clinical findings, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, angles of cervical and segmental lordosis, and the distance between the C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and the C7 posterior-superior corner.

RESULTS

A total of 36 male and 22 female patients were enrolled. A negative correlation was found between the C1-C2 lordosis angle and the C2-C7 lordosis angle irrespective of surgical technique. In patients who were operated on using 30°-angled rods, there was a postoperative increase in C1-C2 lordosis degree and an improvement in C2 cervical SVA values. Postoperative month 6 VAS scores were significantly better in the patients who were operated on with angled rods compared with those who received straight rods.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this is because of the positive effect of the angled rod on sagittal balance. Nevertheless, prospective case-control studies should be conducted with larger groups of subjects. Furthermore, every patient should be evaluated considering the whole spinal sagittal balance.

[Rheumatoid instability in the cervical spine : Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies]

BACKGROUND

The involvement of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to be of clinical importance even in this age of biologics. Pathophysiological changes begin with an isolated atlantoaxial subluxation and may progress to a complex craniocervical and subaxial instability. The onset of cervical myelopathy can occur at any time and leads to a deterioration of the prognosis for the patient.

THERAPY

Treatment of the rheumatoid cervical spine should be aimed at improvement of the symptoms and prevention of further progress of the disease. In the case of instability, this is only possible by surgical treatment. The increasing usage of biological agents has led to a change in the clinical picture of the cervical involvement in RA patients. There are fewer patients presenting with isolated atlantoaxial instability. In contrast, the number of patients with complex craniocervical and/or subaxial instabilities is increasing. Complex cervical instabilities may require a longer fusion from the occiput to the upper thoracic spine. Modern operative techniques make this complex surgery also possible in severely disabled patients with a high comorbidity.

Ten-Year Results of Reconstruction for Rheumatoid Cervical Spine Lesions and Occurrence Factor of Subaxial Subluxation

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Purpose

This study evaluated long-term surgical outcomes of computer-assisted reconstruction using transarticular or cervical pedicle screws for cervical spine lesions caused by advanced rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Overview of Literature

We routinely employ C1-C2 transarticular and cervical pedicle screw instrumentation to reconstruct advanced and unstable RA cervical lesions. However, few reports are available on the long-term results of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid cervical disorders, particularly regarding cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Methods

Six subjects (all female) with RA cervical lesions who underwent atlantoaxial or occipitocervical fixation and were followed for at least 10 years were retrospectively studied. A frameless, stereotactic, optoelectronic, computed tomography-based image guidance system was used for correct screw placement. Variables including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, EuroQol, Ranawat value, and C2-C7 angle before and 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery were assessed along with the occurrence of subaxial subluxation (SAS).

Results

Mean age at initial surgery was 58.2±7 years (range, 51-68 years), and mean follow-up period was 141±11 months (range, 122-153 months). Lesions included atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS, n=2) and AAS+vertical subluxation (n=4). Mean C2-C7 lordotic angle before and 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery was 20.1°±6.1°, 21.0°±4.0°, 18.8°±4.7°, and 17.8°±5.3°, respectively. SAS did not occur in cases maintaining the C2-C7 lordotic angle. In two cases where the C2-C7 lordotic angle declined from 5 years postoperatively, SAS occurred at the C2-C3 level in one and at the C4-C5 level in the other, both of which required reoperation.

Conclusions

Patients with rheumatoid cervical lesions who undergo atlantoaxial or occipitocervical fixation using C1-C2 transarticular or pedicle screws carry a risk of SAS for up to 10 years postoperatively, which may require reoperation.

Endoscopic transnasal anterior release and posterior reduction without odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

Background

To investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic transnasal anterior release and posterior reduction without odontoidectomy to treat irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).

Methods

A series of 9 patients with IAAD underwent endoscopic transnasal anterior release and posterior reduction without odontoidectomy. Etiology, instrumentation, fusion rate, and complications were documented. All patients were assessed clinically and radiologically for neurological recovery using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, atlantodontoid interval (ADI), and cervicomedullary angle (CMA).

Results

The mean age of the patients was 41.6 years, ranging from 14 to 60 years. Pathology showed os odontoideum in 3 patients, old traumatic dens fracture in 3 patients, occipitalization of C1 in 2 patients, and rheumatoid arthritis in 1 patient. Seven patients underwent C1–C2 pedicle screw fixations, and 2 patients required occipitocervical fixation. Eight cases resulted in complete reduction and 1 in partial reduction. Complications included one superficial infection related to the posterior approach. All patients were followed up for an average of 17 (range 13–32) months. Bony fusion was confirmed in all cases under radiologic assessment at 1 year postoperatively, and the bony fusion rate reached 100%. Moreover, no instrumental failure occurred during the entire follow-up period. The JOA score improved from 7.21 ± 1.62 to 12.28 ± 0.81 at the last follow-up. The ADI of 9 cases was 7.06 ± 0.85 mm preoperatively, which decreased to 2.26 ± 0.56 mm at the final follow-up. CMA improved from 103.80° ± 4.16° to 143.23° ± 7.47° postoperatively.

Conclusion

With transnasal approach and lack of odontoidectomy, this method could not only treat IAAD safely and effectively, but also reduce the possibility of many complications associated with the traditional transoral approach and odontoidectomy.

Retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes for atlantoaxial subluxation

Background

Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is characterized by excessive movement at the junction between the atlas (C1) and axis (C2) as a result of either a bony or ligamentous abnormality. Surgical intervention is a therapeutic choice for AAS. In addition to C1 laminectomy (LAM), surgical fixation for subluxation or instability is performed by various techniques. While surgical treatment options for AAS have increased, the outcomes of different surgical techniques remain unclear.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 30 consecutive spinal surgeries performed for AAS patients, C1 LAM in 11 cases and C1/2 fixation in 19 cases. We investigated the correlation between the clinical outcomes and the surgical methods. We also examined the factors related to poor outcomes (the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for cervical myelopathy < 40%) following AAS surgeries.

Results

From a surgical method perspective, the patients in the C1 LAM group were older than those in the C1/2 fixation group (74.6 years vs 68.0 years), and the average recovery rate from the preoperative status was as follows: the C1 LAM group, 39.4%; the C1/2 fixation group, 49.8%. The C-JOA score was significantly improved after surgery in the C1/2 fixation group (from 9.8 to 13.1 points). The fixation technique seemed to successfully reduce C1/2 displacement. Each group exhibited a slight increase in the C1/2 angle and a decrease in the C2–7 angles after the operation. A higher preoperative atlantodental interval (ADI) was associated with good outcomes after the C1/2 fixation. The postoperative ADI was significantly reduced from 8.6 mm to 3.8 mm in the good outcome group after fixation. Patients with higher C1/2 angle showed good outcomes after C1 LAM. Despite the good neurological improvement, the C1/2 fixation method showed higher complication rates compared with C1 LAM method.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that the C1/2 fixation technique exhibited effectiveness in terms of neurological recovery. However, there was a high complication rate in surgeries for AAS, especially in the C1/2 fixation. C1 LAM would be considered for high-risk AAS cases such as elderly patients with multiple comorbidities.

Influence of Atlantoaxial Fusion on Sagittal Alignment of the Occipitocervical and Subaxial spines in Os Odontoideum with Atlantoaxial Instability

Study Design

Retrospective case analysis.

Purpose

We hypothesized that larger the C1–C2 fusion angle, greater the severity of the sagittal malalignment of C0–C1 and C2–C7.

Overview of Literature

In our experience, instances of sagittal malalignment occur at C0–C1 and C2–C7 following atlantoaxial fusion in patients with Os odontoideum (OO).

Methods

We assessed 21 patients who achieved solid atlantoaxial fusion for reducible atlantoaxial instability secondary to OO. The mean patient age at the time of the operation was 42.8 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 4.9 years. Radiographic parameters were preoperatively measured and at the final follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups (A and B) depending on the C1–C2 fusion angle. In group A (n=11), the C1–C2 fusion angle was ≥22°, whereas in group B, it was <22°. The differences in the radiographic parameters of the two groups were evaluated.

Results

At the final follow-up, the C1–C2 angle was increased. However, this increase was not statistically significant (18° vs. 22°, p=0.924). The C0–C1 angle (10° vs. 5°, p<0.05) and C2–C7 angle (22° vs. 13°, p<0.05) significantly decreased. The final C1–C2 angle was negatively correlated with the final C0–C1 and C2–C7 angles. The final C0–C1 angle (4° vs. 6°, p<0.05) and C2–C7 angle (8° vs. 20°, p<0.05) were smaller in group A than in group B. After atlantoaxial fusion, the C0–C1 range of motion (ROM; 17° vs. 9°, p<0.05) and the C2–C7 ROM (39° vs. 31°, p<0.05) were significantly decreased.

Conclusions

We found a negative association between the sagittal alignment of C0–C1 and C2–C7 after atlantoaxial fusion and the C1–C2 fusion angle along with decreased ROM. Therefore, overcorrection of C1–C2 kyphosis should be avoided to maintain good physiologic cervical sagittal alignment.

Late Subaxial Lesion after Overcorrected Occipitocervical Reconstruction in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Retrospective case-control study, level 4.

Purpose

To clarify the risk factors for late subaxial lesion after occipitocervical (O-C) reconstruction. We examined cases requiring fusion-segment-extended (FE) reconstruction in addition to/after O-C reconstruction.

Overview of Literature

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently require O-C reconstruction surgery for cranio-cervical lesions. Acceptable outcomes are achieved via indirect decompression using cervical pedicle screws and occipital plate–rod systems. However, late subaxial lesions may develop occasionally following O-C reconstruction.

Methods

O-C reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and occipital plate–rod systems was performed between 1994 and 2007 in 113 patients with RA. Occipito-atlanto-axial (O-C2) reconstruction was performed for 89 patients, and occipito-subaxial cervical (O-under C2) reconstruction was performed for 24 patients. We reviewed the cases of patients requiring FE reconstruction (fusion extended group, FEG) and 26 consecutive patients who did not require FE reconstruction after a follow-up of >5 years (non-fusion extended group, NEG) as controls.

Results

FE reconstructions were performed for nine patients at an average of 45 months (range, 24–180 months) after O-C reconstruction. Of the 89 patients, three (3%) underwent FE reconstruction in cases of O-C2 reconstruction. Of the 24 patients, five (21%) underwent FE reconstruction in cases of O-under C2 reconstruction (p=0.003, Fisher exact test). Age, sex, RA type, and neurological impairment stage were not significantly different between FEG and NEG. O-under C2 reconstruction, larger correction angle (4° per number of unfixed segment), and O-C7 angle change after O-C reconstruction were the risk factors for late subaxial lesions on radiographic assessment.

Conclusions

Overcorrection of angle at fusion segments requiring O-C7 angle change was a risk factor for late subaxial lesion in patients with RA with fragile bones and joints. Correction should be limited, considering the residual mobility of the cervical unfixed segments.

Incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration following occipitoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability in non-rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following occipitoaxial fusion (OAF) for atlantoaxial instability (AAI) in non-rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

The study group comprised 41 patients without RA who underwent OAF due to AAI. Fifteen patients with postoperative ASD after OAF were classified as the ASD group, and the other 26 patients without postoperative ASD were included in the non-ASD group. There were 12 men and 3 women with a mean age of 43.52 years in the ASD group, and 19 men and 7 women with a mean age of 45.31 years in the non-ASD group. The mean follow-up period was 6.1 and 5.9 years in the ASD group and non-ASD group, respectively. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The difference between pre- and postoperative O-C2 angles in the non-ASD group was significantly greater than that in the ASD group. The C2-7 angles changed significantly between the pre- and postoperative periods. It was suggested that the small O-C2 angle and large C2-7 angle observed in the early postoperative period were risk factors for the development of ASD. We also demonstrated a high incidence of subaxial subluxation (SAS) and swan neck deformity in the ASD group (27 versus 3.8% and 20 versus 0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Under-correction of the O-C2 angle is likely to cause malalignment of the cervical spine, resulting in the development of postoperative ASD, SAS, and swan neck deformity.

[The rheumatic cervical spine]

BACKGROUND

The cervical spine is one of the main sites of manifestation in rheumatoid arthritis outside of the extremities. It can have a decisive influence on disease course via the occurrence of mechanical instabilities as well as neurologic symptoms. Both adequate diagnosis and the corresponding surgical treatment represent a challenge for the involved physicians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review presents relevant diagnostic strategies and possibilities for surgical intervention which aim to avoid potentially fatal neurologic symptoms. Basic literature and expert opinions are also discussed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Through target-oriented surgical management, as well as tight clinical and radiologic monitoring during conservative and surgical therapy, potentially fatal disease courses can be avoided.

Treatment of atlanto-axial subluxation secondary to rheumatoid arthritis by short segment stabilization with polyaxial screws

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study was to analyse the compex clinical and radiographic findings in a group of RA patients with atlanto-axial slip (AAS) treated with free-hand short C1 lateral mass and C2 trans-pedicular screw fixation. The surgical technique used and the pathology treated were the same in all patients, producing a very homogeneous cohort of patients This allowed the study and measurement of radiographic parameters and fusion process.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (21 female, 8 male, mean age 54.9 years, duration of RA 17.3 years) with AAS and without CS were treated by short C1/2 fixation. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years. Pain intensity was monitored using VAS. Radiographic assessment consisted of lateral cervical radiographs in neutral and dynamic views, MR and CT of the cervical spine. The AADI, PADI, AAA, sub-axial cervical Cobb angle and canal-clivus angle (CCA) were measured pre-operatively and during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Significant malposition was recorded in 4 (3.4%) out of 116 inserted screws. AADI, PADI, AAA and CCA values changed significantly after surgery and remained stable during follow-up. The Cobb C angle value showed no significant change after surgery. There was a significant decrease of the VAS after the surgery. Fusion or a stable situation was achieved in all patients at 2-year follow-up. Pannus regression was observed in the vast majority of patients; only in two cases was rheumatic tissue detected on MR at 2 years post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

C1 lateral mass and C2 trans-pedicular fixation with polyaxial screws followed by an autograft between C1 and C2 lamina allowed, with an acceptable complication rate and favourable clinical results, adequate slip reposition, introduction of optimal sagittal alignment in terms of the final AAA with no radiographic consequences for the sub-axial cervical spine and assurance of long-term stability.

A Retrospective Analysis of Subaxial Subluxation After Atlanto-axial Arthrodesis in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Based on Annual Radiographs Obtained for 5 Years

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of subaxial subluxation (SAS) after atlanto-axial arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using annual radiographs obtained for 5 years and clarify the characteristics of SAS after surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Rheumatoid SAS has been reported to occur after atlanto-axial arthrodesis. Many authors have noted that excessive correction of the atlanto-axial angle (AAA) results in a decrease in subaxial lordosis, thereby inducing SAS; therefore, we paid special attention to acquiring a suitable AAA in patients with atlanto-axial arthrodesis.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with AAS treated with surgery were reviewed. In all patients, lateral cervical radiographs were obtained in neutral, maximal flexion, and maximal extension positions every year for 5 years after surgery. We investigated the occurrence and progression of SAS using these annual radiographs.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative value in AAA and subaxial angle (SAA), respectively. Before surgery, SAS was found in 10 patients. The occurrence and progression of SAS after surgery was found in 12 cases (SAS P+ group). There were no significant differences in age, sex, or the duration of RA between the SAS P+ group and the remaining 13 cases. We also found no differences in the preoperative and postoperative AAA and SAA between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SAA was maintained after atlanto-axial arthrodesis in RA-AAS patients, 12 of 25 patients (48%) with AAS developed SAS after atlanto-axial fusion. Further surgery was not needed for SAS up to 5 years after the initial surgery. We did not find any relationship between the occurrence of SAS and the AAA and SAA before and after surgery. Therefore, our findings suggest that proper reduction of AAA in patients with atlanto-axial arthrodesis does not affect the occurrence of SAS at 5 years after surgery.

The Effects of Clinical Factors and Retro-Odontoid Soft Tissue Thickness on Atlantoaxial Instability in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that often occurs in the atlantoaxial segment of the cervical spine and results in instability that can cause severe pain and neurologic symptoms. Thickening of soft tissue posterior to the odontoid process of the atlantoaxial segment is referred to as retro-odontoid soft tissue (ROST) thickness or pseudotumor. The mechanism of ROST thickness is still unknown.

METHODS

Among patients diagnosed with RA, those with cervical radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging records were selected for investigation of their clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, radiologic evaluation, and RA medication history.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were selected and divided into lower and upper median groups according to the ROST thickness value. In patients with RA, the median ROST thickness value was 2.3 mm (interquartile range, 1.4-3.4). The median value of the anterior atlanto-dens interval (ADI) was 2.4 mm, with a significant difference being observed between the lower and upper median ROST thickness groups (P = 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed a correlation between Steinbrocker stage and the positivity of rheumatoid factor. For each unit increase in the Steinbrocker stage, the ROST thickness increased by 0.35 mm (β, -0.349; 95% confidence interval -0.643 to -0.055; P = 0.020). For every 1-mm increase in the ADI, ROST thickness decreased by 0.16 mm (β, -0.163; 95% confidence interval -0.264 to -0.062; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a statistical correlation between ROST thickness and ADI related to biomechanical changes in the dynamic atlantoaxial segment, thereby suggesting the value of a prospective study.

Correlations of Cervical Sagittal Alignment before and after Occipitocervical Fusion

Study Design Retrospective radiographic study. Objective To investigate changes and correlations of cervical sagittal alignment including T1 slope before and after occipitocervical corrective surgery. We also investigated the relevance for preoperative planning. Methods We conducted a retrospective radiographic analysis of 27 patients who underwent surgery for occipitocervical deformity. There were 7 men and 20 women with a mean age of 56.0 years. Mean follow-up was 68.0 months (range 24 to 120). The radiographic parameters measured before surgery and at final follow-up included McGregor slope, T1 slope, occipito (O)-C2 angle, O-C7 angle, and C2-C7 angle. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between the radiographic parameters. Results There was a stronger positive correlation between the T1 slope and the O-C7 angle both preoperatively and postoperatively (r = 0.72 and r = 0.83, respectively) than between the T1 slope and the C2-C7 angle (r = 0.60 and r = 0.76, respectively). The O-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle had inverse correlations to each other both pre- and postoperatively (r =  - 0.50 and -0.45). McGregor slope and T1 slope did not significantly change postoperatively at final follow-up. Increase in O-C2 angle after surgery (mean change, 10.7 degrees) inversely correlated with decrease in postoperative C2-C7 angle (mean change, 12.2 degrees). As result of these complementary changes, O-C7 angle did not statistically change. Conclusions Our results suggest that the O-C7 angle is regulated by T1 slope and the corresponding O-C7 angle is divided into the O-C2 and C2-C7 angles, which have inverse correlation to each other and then maintain McGregor slope (horizontal gaze).

Distal Junctional Disease after Occipitothoracic Fusion for Rheumatoid Cervical Disorders: Correlation with Cervical Spine Sagittal Alignment

Study Design Retrospective radiographic study. Objective We have performed occipitothoracic (OT) fusion for severe rheumatoid cervical disorders since 1991. In our previous study, we reported that the distal junctional disease occurred in patients with fusion of O-T4 or longer due to increased mechanical stress. The present study further evaluated the association between the distal junctional disease and the cervical spine sagittal alignment. Methods Among 60 consecutive OT fusion cases between 1991 and 2010, 24 patients who underwent O-T5 fusion were enrolled in this study. The patients were grouped based on whether they developed postoperative distal junctional disease (group F) or not (group N). We measured pre- and postoperative O-C2, C2-C7, and O-C7 angles and evaluated the association between these values and the occurrence of distal junctional disease. Results Seven (29%) of 24 patients developed adjacent-level vertebral fractures as distal junctional disease. In group F, the mean pre- and postoperative O-C2, C2-C7, and O-C7 angles were 12.1 and 16.8, 7.2 and 11.2, and 19.4 and 27.9 degrees, respectively. In group N, the mean pre- and postoperative O-C2, C2-C7, and O-C7 angles were 15.9 and 15.0, 4.9 and 5.8, and 21.0 and 20.9 degrees, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The difference in the O-C7 angle (postoperative angle - preoperative angle) in group F was significantly larger than that in group N (p = 0.04). Conclusion Excessive correction of the O-C7 angle (hyperlordotic alignment) is likely to cause postoperative distal junctional disease following the OT fusion.

Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis--a systematic review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic chronic inflammatory disorder that can compromise the cervical spine in up to 80% of the cases. The most common radiological presentations of cervical involvement are atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS), cranial settling and subaxial subluxation (SAS). We performed a systematic review in the PubMed Database of articles published later 2005 to evaluate the prevalence, progression and risk factors for cervical spine involvement in RA patients. Articles were classified according to their level of evidence. Our literature review reported a wide range in the prevalence of cervical spine disease, probably explained by the different studied populations and disease characteristics. Uncontrolled RA is probably the main risk factor for developing a spinal instability. Adequate treatment with DMARD and BA can prevent development of cervical instabilities but did not avoid progression of a pre-existing injury. MRI is the best radiological method for diagnosis cervical spine involvement. AAS is the most common form of RA. Long term radiological follow-up is necessary to diagnosis patients with late instabilities and monitoring progression of diagnosed injuries.

Adjacent-level failures after occipito-thoracic fusion for rheumatoid cervical disorders

INTRODUCTION

The natural history of cervical spine lesions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is variable. We have actively performed occipito-thoracic fusion for severe destructive rheumatoid cervical disorders and reported its clinical results and complications. In our previous study, the most frequent complication was the adjacent-level failures caused by the fragile spine. The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for adjacent-level failures after occipito-thoracic fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were 35 RA patients (31 females and 4 males) who underwent occipito-thoracic fusion using RRS Loop Spinal System(®) (Robert Reid Inc. Tokyo, Japan), and the incidence and characteristics of adjacent-level failures were investigated. Furthermore, the adjacent-level failures were divided into two types according to their levels, fracture at the lowest level of the fusion area and that at the level inferior to the fusion area, and the characteristics of each type were evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Nine (26%) of 35 patients suffered adjacent-level failures (10 vertebral fractures). Adjacent-level failures occurred when the distance of fixation was "O-T4" or longer. The long fusion might cause adjacent-level failures due to greater mechanical stress. Seven fractures occurred at the lowest level of the fusion area, and all of them were cured without symptoms by conservative treatment. Three fractures occurred at the level inferior to the fusion area, and one of them needed additional surgery due to sudden paraplegia resulting from collapse of the adjacent vertebra. After occipito-thoracic fusion, burst fractures at the level inferior to the fusion area might cause sudden paraplegia, and therefore a careful observation should be required for patients with these fractures.

Mid-term results of computer-assisted cervical reconstruction for rheumatoid cervical spines

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective single-center study. We routinely have used C1-C2 transarticular and cervical pedicle screw fixations to reconstruct highly destructed unstable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cervical lesions. However, there is little data on mid-term results of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid cervical disorders, particularly, cervical pedicle screw fixation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term surgical results of computer-assisted cervical reconstruction for such lesions.

METHODS

Seventeen subjects (4 men, 13 women; mean age, 61 ± 9 years) with RA cervical lesions who underwent C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation or occipitocervical fixation, with at least 5 years follow-up were studied. A frameless, stereotactic, optoelectronic, CT-based image-guidance system, was used for correct screw placement. Variables including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Ranawat class, EuroQol (EQ-5D), atlantodental interval, and Ranawat values before, and at 2 and 5 years after surgery, were evaluated. Furthermore, screw perforation rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

The lesions included atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS, n = 6), AAS + vertical subluxation (VS, n = 7), and AAS + VS + subaxial subluxation (n = 4). There was significant neurological improvement at 2 years after surgery, as evidenced by the JOA scores, Ranawat class, and the EQ-5D utility weight. However, at 5 years after surgery, there was a deterioration of this improvement. The Ranawat values before, and at 2 and 5 years after surgery, were not significantly different. Major screw perforation rate was 2.1 %. No neural and vascular complications associated with screw insertion were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with rheumatoid cervical lesions who underwent C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation or occipitocervical fixation using a pedicle screw had significantly improved clinical parameters at 2 years after surgery. However, there was a deterioration of this improvement at 5 years post surgery.

Effect of a reduction of the atlanto-axial angle on the cranio-cervical and subaxial angles following atlanto-axial arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

We retrospectively investigated the radiographic findings in patients with atlanto-axial subluxation (AAS) due to rheumatoid arthritis, and clarified the effect of reduction of the atlanto-axial angle (AAA) on the cranio-cervical and subaxial angles.

METHODS

Forty-one patients, consisting of 29 females and 12 males, with AAS treated by surgery were reviewed. The average patient age at surgery was 61.0 years, and the average follow-up period was 4.0 years. We investigated the AAA at the neutral position in lateral cervical radiographs before surgery and at the last follow-up. In addition, we also investigated the clivo-axial angle (CAA) and the subaxial angle (SAA) at the neutral position before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Due to pre-operative AAA, the patients were classified into three groups as follows: (1) the kyphotic group (K group), (2) the neutral group (N group), and (3) the lordotic group (L group). The average AAA values at the neutral position in the K group before and after surgery were 6.0° and 18.1°, respectively (P < 0.001). In the N group 19.7° and 21.7°, respectively (P < 0.05), and in the L group 31.6° and 27.0°, respectively (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences in the average CAA values were found before and after surgery in all groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in the SAA values were seen before and after surgery in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A proper reduction of the AAA did not affect the cranial angles or induce kyphotic malalignment of the subaxial region after atlanto-axial arthrodesis. However, if we can obtain a significant and large reduction of AAA in patients showing kyphosis before surgery, then this reduction will be offset in the atlanto-occipital joint and we should therefore pay special attention to its morphology after surgery.

Rheumatoid vertical and subaxial subluxation can be prevented by atlantoaxial posterior screw fixation

PURPOSE

Literature has described a risk for subsequent vertical subluxation (VS) and subaxial subluxation (SAS) following atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid patients; however, the interaction of each subluxation and the radiographic findings for atlantoaxial fixation has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation on the development of subluxation in patients with rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2006, rheumatoid patients treated with transarticular fixation and posterior wiring (TA) or C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw fixations (SR) in the Nagoya Spine Group hospitals, a multicenter cooperative study group, were included in this study. VS, SAS, craniocervical sagittal alignment, and range of motion (ROM) at the atlantoaxial adjacent segments were investigated to determine whether posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation is a prophylactic or a risk factor for the development of VS and SAS.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 7.2 years (4-12). No statistically significant difference was observed among the patients treated with either of the procedure during the follow-up period. Of 34 patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation, SAS was observed in 26.5 % during the follow-up period; however, VS was not observed. Postoperative C2-7 angle, and Oc-C1 and C2-3 ROM were significantly different between patients with and without postoperative SAS. The incidence of SAS was 38.9 % for TA and 12.5 % for SR; statistically significant differences were observed in the postoperative C1-2 and C2-7 angles, and C2-3 ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Atlantoaxial posterior screw fixation may be an appropriate prophylactic intervention for VS and SAS if the atlantoaxial joint develops bony fusion following physiological alignment. Compared to TA, SR provided optimal atlantoaxial angle and prevented lower adjacent segment degeneration, thereby reducing SAS.

Atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review published series describing C1-2 posterior instrumented fusions and summarize clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with transarticular screw (TAS) fixation.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for English-language articles published between 1986 and April 2011 describing posterior atlantoaxial instrumentation with C1-2 TAS fixation. There were 45 studies including 2073 patients treated with TAS that fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis techniques were used to calculate outcomes.

RESULTS

All studies provided class III evidence. The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 0.8%, and the incidence of neurologic injury was 0.2%. The incidence of clinically significant malpositioned screws was 7.1% (confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-8.8%), the incidence of vertebral artery injury was 3.1% (CI, 2.3%-4.3%), and the rate of fusion with the TAS technique was 94.6% (CI, 92.6%-96.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

TAS fixation is a safe and effective treatment option for C1-2 instability with high rates of fusion (approximately 95%). Screw malposition and vertebral artery injury occurred in approximately 5% of patients. The successful insertion of TAS requires a thorough knowledge of atlantoaxial anatomy.

Imaging the spine in arthritis-a pictorial review

Spinal involvement is frequent in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and seronegative spondyloarthritides (SpA), and its diagnosis is important. Thus, MRI and CT are increasingly used, although radiography is the recommended initial examination. The purpose of this review is to present the typical radiographic features of spinal changes in RA and SpA in addition to the advantages of MRI and CT, respectively. RA changes are usually located in the cervical spine and can result in serious joint instability. Subluxation is diagnosed by radiography, but supplementary MRI and/or CT is always indicated to visualise the spinal cord and canal in patients with vertical subluxation, neck pain and/or neurological symptoms. SpA may involve all parts of the spine. Ankylosing spondylitis is the most frequent form of SpA and has rather characteristic radiographic features. In early stages it is characterised by vertebral squaring and condensation of vertebral corners, in later stages by slim ossifications between vertebral bodies, vertebral fusion, arthritis/ankylosis of apophyseal joints and ligamentous ossification causing spinal stiffness. The imaging features of the other forms of SpA can vary, but voluminous paravertebral ossifications often occur in psoriatic SpA. MRI can detect signs of active inflammation as well as chronic structural changes; CT is valuable for detecting fracture.