A rare presentation of cervical osteochondroma arising in a spinous process

Osteochondroma Arising From the Inferior Articular Process of the Lumbar Spine in a Geriatric Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

Objective

Spinal osteochondromas are rare, and approximately less than 5% occur as spinal lesions. We report the case of a solitary osteochondroma of the spine and review and update the literature on spinal osteochondroma, including surgical treatment and subsequent results.

Case Description

A 73-year-old female patient complained of a 10-year history of back pain and a 4-year history of right-side lower extremity radiating pain with paresthesia. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a bony mass arising from the inferior articular process (IAP) of L3, presenting with features of compressive spinal stenosis at the L3–L4 level. The treatment strategy included the complete marginal excision of the lesion through the posterior approach, as well as complete decompression of the spinal canal and nerve roots. The patient’s symptoms resolved after surgery, and histopathological examination identified the lesion as an osteochondroma.

Review Results

This review study included 168 solitary osteochondroma cases. The most commonly involved spinal level was cervical (51.8%), and the most frequent spinal anatomic column involved was the posterior column (70.8%). Radiculopathy accounted for 30.3% of all cases, myelopathy accounted for 31.0%, and 7.7% exhibited both symptoms simultaneously. The recurrence rate was 6.0%.

Conclusion

Computed tomography and MRI can effectively diagnose spinal osteochondroma, and surgical treatment can effectively improve clinical outcomes. In almost all symptomatic cases, the best treatment is marginal excision of the tumor. Complete resection of the cartilaginous cap of the tumor is especially important to prevent recurrence.

Fifth lumbar vertebrae solitary osteochondroma arising from the neural arch, a case report

Background

Osteochondromas are a benign outgrowth of bone and cartilage and one of the most common bone tumors that usually occur in long bones, with only 1–4% being located in the spine, more frequently in the cervical and upper dorsal region, and rarely the lumbar spine. Here, we report a case of lumbar spine (L5) osteochondroma arising from the neural arch.

Case presentation

A 30-year-old man presenting with a solid painless mass at the lower lumbar region. No neurological symptoms. Radiological examinations revealed an exophytic lesion in the fifth lumbar articular process, and the spinous process appears to be a solitary osteochondroma. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging showed a bony lesion covered by a 2-mm-thick cartilaginous cap. Surgical en bloc resection of the mass was performed, and the histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of osteochondroma. No evidence of recurrence at the end of 4-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Osteochondromas are benign tumors rarely present in the spine; diagnosis can be made by the typical appearance of the cartilaginous cap over the mass in the magnetic resonance imaging. Surgical excision is the best management option.

Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment Options: A Cervical Spine Osteochondroma Meta-Analysis

Osteochondroma is described as a capped benign bony neoplasm that forms on the outer surface of bone. These tumors affect nearly 6 million people per year. Although osteochondromas most often involve the appendicular skeleton, many involve the spine, with many cases located in the cervical spine. When osteochondromas involve the spine, they can present with a variety of symptoms, including pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy, which may necessitate surgical treatment. Spinal osteochondromas can be classified into 2 types: multiple osteochondromas in the context of patients with multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE) and solitary osteochondroma or solitary exostosis (SE). Previous reviews have captured only some of the available literature on cervical osteochondromas and have generally focused on either SE or those associated with MHE. The purpose of our review was to provide an extensive review of all previously reported cervical osteochondromas and to compare osteochondroma characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes in the context of MHE and SE.

Solitary Osteochondroma of the Spine-A Case Series: Review of Solitary Osteochondroma With Myelopathic Symptoms

STUDY DESIGN

Case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

There is a growing body of literature supporting that osteochondroma of the spine may not be as rare as previously documented. The purpose of this study was to perform an updated review and present our experience with 4 cases of solitary osteochondroma of the spine, including surgical treatment and subsequent outcomes.

METHODS

A review of 4 cases and an updated literature review.

RESULTS

All 4 cases were diagnosed as solitary osteochondroma of the spine based on clinical and histopathologic findings. Majority of the lesions arose from the posterior column with one case showing extension into the middle column with clinical neurologic sequelae. Treatment strategies for all cases included complete marginal excision of the lesions using a posterior approach. All 4 cases showed no radiographic evidence of recurrence. The literature review yielded 132 cases of solitary osteochondroma and 17 case associated with multiple hereditary exostosis. Out of the 132 cases, 36 presented with myelopathic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Osteochondroma of the spine may not be as rare as previously reported. The best approach to treatment in almost all symptomatic cases include wide surgical excision of the tumor. This should include complete resection of the cartilaginous cap of the tumor in an effort to prevent recurrence. When excision is performed properly, the outcomes are excellent with very low recurrence of the tumor.

Cervical osteochondroma with neurological symptoms: literature review and a case report

INTRODUCTION

Osteochondromas are common benign tumors of bone and spinal involvement is uncommon. Solitary spinal osteochondromas may produce a wide variety of symptoms depending on their location and relationship to adjacent neural structures.

CASE PRESENTATION

Herein, we present a case of solitary osteochondroma arising from the posterior arch of C1, causing left-sided ascending numbness and paresthesia and difficulty walking. The lesion was totally resected through a posterior approach. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of benign osteochondroma.

DISCUSSION

Spinal cord compression is uncommon in spinal osteochondromas because in most cases the tumor grows out of the spinal column. To prevent neurological compromise, complete surgical removal is mandatory when an intraspinal osteochondroma with cord compression is diagnosed, which also helps to prevent recurrence. Our literature review of similar cases indicates that despite the old belief that C2 is the most commonly involved vertebra for osteochondromas, C1 is actually the most commonly involved vertebra in the cervical region.

Solitary osteochondroma arising in lumbar spinous process: Case report

Solitary osteochondromas rarely occur in the axial skeleton. Those tumors mostly arise on the posterior elements of the cervical column causing various symptoms especially when developing within the spinal canal. Exophytic lumbar variety is uncommon presenting with palpable mass or spinal deformity. We report a 20-year-old man presenting with a solid painless mass at the lower lumbar region. Radiological examinations revealed an exophytic lesion arising in the third lumbar spinous process appearing to be a solitary osteochondroma. The lesion was treated by en-bloc resection; histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of osteochondroma with no evidence of recurrence at the end of 2-year follow up.

Spinal stenosis frequent in children with multiple hereditary exostoses

PURPOSE

Children with multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) have numerous osteochondromas, with the most prominent lesions typically over the appendicular skeleton. A recent report noted a high rate of intracanal lesions in this patient population and recommended preventative spinal screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). We sought to evaluate the prevalence of spinal stenosis from intracanal osteochondromas at our pediatric orthopedic center in order to evaluate if routine screening is warranted.

METHODS

All pediatric patients treated for MHE were retrospectively identified. Records were reviewed to determine demographics, previous orthopedic surgery, and indication and results of axial spine imaging (CT or MRI). Imaging studies were reviewed to evaluate the presence of intracanal and compressive spinal lesions.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 2011, axial imaging was performed in nine patients with MHE due to concerns of pain, weakness, and/or dizziness. These patients had moderate disease involvement, with a mean of 4.9 previous orthopedic surgeries to address skeletal osteochondromas. Two patients with MHE had cervical spinal stenosis secondary to intracanal osteochondromas. Both children successfully underwent spinal decompression. Thus, of our MHE population undergoing axial imaging, 22 % were noted to have intracanal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience reveals a >20 % rate of compressive intracanal osteochondromas in MHE patients undergoing spinal imaging. These two patients represent 5 % of the MHE patients treated at our center. These lesions may be slow growing, and significant consequences can occur if not identified promptly. Thus, we confer that routine axial screening of the spinal canal may be warranted in these children.