Upper instrumented vertebral fractures in long lumbar fusions: what are the associated risk factors?

Can We Rely on Prophylactic Two-Level Vertebral Cement Augmentation in Long-Segment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery to Reduce the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Complications?

Background and Objectives: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF), the most prevalent complications following long-segment thoracolumbar fusions for adult spinal deformity (ASD), remain lacking in defined preventive measures. We studied whether one of the previously reported strategies with successful results-a prophylactic augmentation of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent vertebra to the UIV (UIV + 1) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-could also serve as a preventive measure of PJK/PJF in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Materials and Methods: The study included 29 ASD patients who underwent a combination of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LLIF) at L1-2 through L4-5, all-pedicle-screw instrumentation from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum, S2-alar-iliac fixation, and two-level balloon-assisted PMMA vertebroplasty at the UIV and UIV + 1. Results: With a minimum 3-year follow-up, non-PJK/PJF group accounted for fifteen patients (52%), PJK for eight patients (28%), and PJF requiring surgical revision for six patients (21%). We had a total of seven patients with proximal junctional fracture, even though no patients showed implant/bone interface failure with screw pullout, probably through the effect of PMMA. In contrast to the PJK cohort, six PJF patients all had varying degrees of neurologic deficits from modified Frankel grade C to D3, which recovered to grades D3 and to grade D2 in three patients each, after a revision operation of proximal extension of instrumented fusion with or without neural decompression. None of the possible demographic and radiologic risk factors showed statistical differences between the non-PJK/PJF, PJK, and PJF groups. Conclusions: Compared with the traditional open surgical approach used in the previous studies with a positive result for the prophylactic two-level cement augmentation, the MIS procedures with substantial benefits to patients in terms of less access-related morbidity and less blood loss also provide a greater segmental stability, which, however, may have a negative effect on the development of PJK/PJF.

Odontoid fractures above C2 to pelvis posterior instrumented fusions: a single center's 11-year experience

PURPOSE

To define the prevalence, characteristics, and treatment approach for proximal junction failure secondary to odontoid fractures in patients with prior C2-pelvis posterior instrumented fusions (PSF).

METHODS

A single institution's database was queried for multi-level fusions (6+ levels), including a cervical component. Posterior instrumentation from C2-pelvis and minimum 6-month follow-up was inclusion criteria. Patients who sustained dens fractures were identified; each fracture was subdivided based on Anderson & D'Alonzo and Grauer's classifications. Comparisons between the groups were performed using Chi-square and T tests.

RESULTS

80 patients (71.3% female; average age 68.1 ± 8.1 years; 45.0% osteoporosis) were included. Average follow-up was 59.8 ± 42.7 months. Six patients (7.5%) suffered an odontoid fracture post-operatively. Cause of fracture in all patients was a mechanical fall. Average time to fracture was 23 ± 23.1 months. Average follow-up after initiation of fracture management was 5.84 ± 4 years (minimum 1 year). Three patients sustained type IIA fractures one of which had a concomitant unilateral C2 pars fracture. Three patients sustained comminuted type III fractures with concomitant unilateral C2 pars fractures. Initial treatment included operative care in 2 patients, and an attempt at non-operative care in 4. Non-operative care failed in 75% of patients who ultimately required revision with proximal extension. All patients with a concomitant pars fracture had failure of non-operative care. Patients with an intact pars were more stable, but 50% required revision for pain.

CONCLUSIONS

In this 11-year experience at a single institution, the prevalence of odontoid fractures above a C2-pelvis PSF was 7.5%. Fracture morphology varied, but 50% were complex, comminuted C2 body fractures with concomitant pars fractures. While nonoperative management may be suitable for type II fractures with simple patterns, more complex and unstable fractures likely benefit from upfront surgical intervention to prevent fracture displacement and neural compression. As all fractures occurred secondary to a mechanical fall, inpatient and community measures aimed to minimize risk and prevent mechanical falls would be beneficial in this high-risk group.

Navigated Hybrid Open/Muscle-sparing Approach to 2-level Cement Augmentation of the UIV and UIV+1 for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Failure: Supplemental Manuscript to Operative Video

STUDY DESIGN

Operative video and supplemental manuscript.

OBJECTIVE

To present a cement augmentation technique of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV+1 for prevention of proximal junctional fractures (PJFs) in multi-level thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJFs are unfortunately a common occurrence after multi-level thoracolumbar instrumented fusions to the pelvis for adult spinal deformity that can result in significant functional disability and often require costly revision operations. As such, their prevention is key.

METHODS

A surgical video illustrates the nuances of a 2-level cement augmentation technique, consisting of an open vertebroplasty of the UIV through fenestrated screws and a muscle-sparing kyphoplasty of the UIV+1.

RESULTS

Utility of performing an open vertebroplasty of the UIV through fenestrated screws and muscle-sparing kyphoplasty of the UIV+1 lies in its ability to minimize soft-tissue disruption at the adjacent segment while providing additional structural support to the anterior column at this high-risk zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Cement augmentation of the UIV and UIV+1 consisting of a hybrid open vertebroplasty and muscle-sparing kyphoplasty can be an effective strategy to decrease the incidence of PJF after multi-level posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusions to the pelvis for adult spinal deformity.

Risk Factors for Distal Junctional Problems Following Long Instrumented Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: Are they Related to the Paraspinal Muscles

PURPOSE

Although the incidence of distal junctional problems (DJPs) following long construct-based treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) is lower, affected patients are more likely to require revision surgery when they occur. So the aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with DJPs to avoid its occurrence by at least 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 182 DLS patients undergoing long instrumented fusion surgery (≥4 levels) between February 2011 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were placed into the DJP group if a DJP occurred at the final follow-up; patients without mechanical complications were matched 1:2 according to age, sex and BMI as the control group. Patient characteristics, surgical variables, radiographic parameters, lumbar muscularity and fatty degeneration were analyzed statistically. The statistical differences in the results between the two groups (p values <0.05) and other variables selected by experts were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model, and the forwards likelihood ratio method was used to analyze the independent risk factors for DJPs.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (13.2%) patients suffered a DJP in the postoperative period and the reoperation rate was 8.8%. On univariate analysis, the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) CT value (p = 0.042); instrumented levels (p = 0.030); preoperative coronal vertical axis (CVA) (p = 0.046), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) (p = 0.006), L4-S1 lordosis (p = 0.013), sacral slop (SS) (p = 0.030), pelvic tilt (PT) classification (p = 0.004), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p = 0.021); TLK correction (p = 0.049); post-operative CVA (p = 0.029); Overall, There was no significant difference in the paraspinal muscle parameters between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, instrumented levels (OR = 1.595; p = 0.035), preoperative SVA (OR = 1.016; p = 0.022) and preoperative PT (OR = 0.873; p = 0.001) were identified as significant independent risk factors for DJP.

CONCLUSION

Longer instrumented levels, a greater preoperative SVA and a smaller PT were found to be strongly associated with the presence of DJPs in patients treated for DLS. The degeneration of the paraspinal muscles may not be related to the occurrence of DJPs. For DLS patients, the occurrence of DJP can be reduced by selecting reasonable fusion segments and evaluating the patient's sagittal balance and spino-pelvic parameters before operation.

Comparative Analysis of Hounsfield Units and Vertebral Bone Quality Scores for Predicting Proximal Junctional Failure in Female Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Undergoing Planned 2-Stage Corrective Surgery with Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT)-based Hounsfield units (HUs) and magnetic resonance imaging-based Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) scores as alternatives to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for predicting the risk of proximal junctional failure (PJF) in female patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) undergoing 2-stage corrective surgery with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

METHODS

The study included 53 female patients with ASD who underwent 2-stage corrective surgery with LLIF from January 2016 to April 2022 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. CT and magnetic resonance imaging scans were evaluated for their correlation with PJF.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients (mean age 70.2 years), 14 had PJF. Patients with PJF had significantly lower HU values at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (113.0 ± 29.4 vs. 141.1 ± 41.5, P = 0.036) and L4 (113.4 ± 59.5 vs. 160.0 ± 64.9, P = 0.026) than those without PJF. However, there was no difference in VBQ scores between the 2 groups. PJF correlated with HU values at UIV and L4 but not with VBQ scores. Patients with PJF also had significantly different pre- and postoperative thoracic kyphosis, postoperative pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and proximal junctional angle compared to those without PJF.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that measuring HU values at UIV or L4 by CT may be useful for predicting the risk of PJF in female ASD patients undergoing 2-stage corrective surgery with LLIF. Therefore, CT-based HUs should be considered in ASD surgery planning to reduce the risk of PJF.

Incidence and risk factors of vertebral body collapse after posterior instrumented spinal fusion in elderly patients: An observational study

This study investigates the incidence and risk factors of new vertebral body collapse (VC) after posterior instrumented spinal fusion in patients older than 70 years. This retrospective study analyzed the data of elderly patients who underwent posterior instrumented spinal fusion in the thoracolumbar spine between January 2013 and December 2017. The 2 subsamples comprised of patients who had experienced vertebral compression fracture (VCF) before the index spinal surgery (group 1, n = 324) and those who had not (group 2, n = 1040). We recorded and analyzed their baseline characteristics, their underlying comorbidities, and the details of their current instrumented spinal fusion. The incidences of new VC and screw loosening were recorded. In groups 1 and 2, the incidences of new VC were 31.8% and 22.7%, respectively, and those of new VC with screw loosening were 25.6% and 33%, respectively. The risk factor was upper screw level at the thoracolumbar junction (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.181, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.135-4.190) with previous VCF. The risk factors were age ≥ 80 years (HR = 1.782, 95% CI: 1.132-2.805), instrumented levels > 4 (HR = 1.774, 95% CI: 1.292-2.437), and peptic ulcer (HR = 20.219, 95% CI: 2.262-180.731) without previous VCF. Clinicians should closely monitor new VC after posterior instrumented spinal fusion in elderly patients with previous VCF with upper screw level at the thoracolumbar junction and in patients without previous VCF aged ≥ 80 years, with instrumented levels > 4 and peptic ulcer.

Proximal junctional fractures after long-segment instrumented fusion: comparisons between upper instrumented vertebrae and upper instrumented vertebrae + 1

Introduction

Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is a well-known complication after long-segment (at least 4 vertebral levels) instrumented fusion. The etiologies of PJF include degenerative processes or are fracture induced. The fracture type of PJF includes vertebral fractures developed at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) or UIV + 1. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiographic features of these two subtypes of PJF and to analyze risk factors in these patients.

Method

In total, forty-two patients with PJF who underwent revision surgery were included. Twenty patients suffered fractures at the UIV, and the other 22 cases had fractures at UIV + 1. The weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and bone mineral density (BMD) T scores for these patients were recorded. Surgery-related data of index surgery and complications were collected. Radiographic parameters including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL were recorded in both groups before and after the revision surgery.

Result

Both groups had severe osteoporosis and comorbidities. The interval between the index surgery and revision surgery was shorter in the UIV group than in the UIV + 1 group (8.2 months vs. 35.9 months; p < 0.001). The analysis for radiographic parameters in UIV and UIV + 1 group demonstrated no significant change before and after the revision surgery. However, the preoperative radiographic analysis showed a larger PT (31.5° vs. 23.2°, p = 0.013), PI (53.7° vs. 45.3°, p = 0.035), and SVA (78.6° vs. 59.4°, p = 0.024) in the UIV group compared to the UIV + 1 group. The postoperative radiographic analysis showed a larger PI-LL (27.8° vs. 18.1°, p = 0.016) in the UIV group compared to the UIV + 1 group.

Conclusion

PJF in the UIV group tends to occur earlier than in the UIV + 1 group. Moreover, more severe global sagittal imbalances were found in the UIV group than in UIV + 1 group.

Compensatory mechanisms recruited against proximal junctional kyphosis by patients instrumented from the thoracolumbar junction to the iliac

PURPOSE

The compensatory mechanisms recruited by un-instrumented patients against sagittal imbalance are well documented. However, there is a lack of information regarding instrumented patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively in a multicenter adult spinal deformity database. We included patients suffering PJK/PJF after (T8-L2) to iliac instrumentation with minimum two-year follow-up. We measured quantitative sagittal spinopelvic and qualitative sagittal distribution parameters in the immediate postoperative period (6w) and at the time of PJK/PJF appearance. We analyzed how these parameters changed comparing these two time points with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were included. Two different patterns at PJK/PJF were found: 36 patients activated compensation (defined as an increase in pelvic retroversion (ΔRPV > 5º), and 33 did not (ΔRPV < 5º). The difference in behavior relied mostly on the amount of not surgically restored pelvic rotation at 6w (OR: 0.6; CI95%: 0.4-9.2; P = 0.017). Non-compensators had less rotation reserve (PTx100/PI = 33.9% vs 47.8%;P < 0.001) associated with worse 6w relative pelvic version and lower lumbar arc restoration, worse 6w relative sagittal alignment and GAP-score, compared with compensators (P < 0.001). Compensators' response was based on pelvic retroversion, causing lower lumbar arc decrease, lumbar apex caudal migration, and upper lumbar arc posterior inclination. Despite compensation, a thoracic kyphosis increase in both upper and lower arches gradually evolved into a PJK/PJF. Non-compensators did not react to PJK/PJF, which forced them into kyphosis from the lumbar apex and extending cranially, mainly throughout the upper thoracic arc.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients fused from the TL junction to the iliac, those having greater postoperative pelvic rotation reserve showed greater capacity to recruit compensatory mechanisms against PJK/PJF.

Proximal junctional fracture and kyphosis after long spinopelvic corrective fixation for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND

Proximal junctional fractures (PJFx) are the main cause for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), a complication of adult spinal deformity surgery. This study investigated risk factors for PJFx when performing long spinopelvic corrective fixation with lateral interbody fusion from T9 to ilium.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 43 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Radiographic measurements including thoracic kyphosis (TK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), proximal junctional angle (PJA), lumbar lordosis (LL), lower LL, and pelvic tilt were measured preoperatively, one-month postoperatively, and at final follow up. TK and LL were also measured in a fulcrum backward-bending position preoperatively.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, PJK was found in 30/43 patients (69.8%); 20.9% of the cases had PJFx (9 patients). TPA (preoperative, and one-month postoperative) was significantly higher in the PJFx group than in the other groups. The differences in TPA, TK, and PJA between preoperative and one-month postoperative measurements in the PJFx group were significantly higher than those in the other groups. At final follow up, SVA was significantly higher in the PJFx group than in the "PJK without PJFx" group. TPA and TK were significantly higher in the PJFx group than in the other groups. PJA was significantly different between all groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative large TPA was the only risk factor for PJFx. Preoperative flexibility of the thoracolumbar spine and overcorrection of sagittal deformity were not related to PJFx or PJK.

The Fate of Proximal Junctional Vertebral Fractures after Long-Segment Spinal Fixation : Are There Predictable Radiologic Characteristics for Revision surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the radiographic characteristics of the uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) and UIV+1 compression fractures that are predictive of revision surgery following long-segment spinal fixation.

METHODS

A total 27 patients who presented newly developed compression fracture at UIV, UIV+1 after long segment spinal fixation (minimum 5 vertebral bodies, lowest instrumented vertebra of L5 or distal) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to following management : revisional surgery (group A, n=13) and conservative care (group B, n=14). Pre- and postoperative images, and images taken shortly before and after the occurrence of fracture were evaluated for radiologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Despite similar degrees of surgical correction of deformity, the fate of the two groups with proximal junctional compression fractures differed. Immediately after the fracture, the decrement of adjacent disc height in group A (32.3±7.6 mm to 23.7±8.4 mm, Δ=8.5±6.9 mm) was greater than group B (31.0±13.9 mm to 30.1±15.5 mm, Δ=0.9±2.9 mm, p=0.003). Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging indicated that group A patients have a higher grade of disc degeneration adjacent to fractured vertebrae compared to group B (modified Pfirrmann grade, group A : 6.10±0.99, group B : 4.08±0.90, p=0.004). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that decrement of disc height was the only associated risk factor for future revision surgery (odds ratio, 1.891; 95% confidence interval, 1.121-3.190; p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Proximal junctional vertebral compression fractures with greater early-stage decrement of adjacent disc height were associated with increased risk of future neurological deterioration and necessity of revision. The condition of adjacent disc degeneration should be considered regarding severity and revision rate of proximal junctional kyphosis/proximal junction failures.

Junctional Failure After Thoracolumbar Kyphosis Correction in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the characteristics and revision rate of junctional failure after surgical correction for thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

A total of 230 patients had undergone surgical correction for thoracolumbar kyphosis from 2010 to 2019. The state of ankylosis between the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV+1 and between the lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) and LIV-1 was analyzed using a modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score. Proximal junctional failure (PJF) and distal junctional failure (DJF) were defined as any type of symptomatic junctional failure.

RESULTS

Of the 230 patients, 23 (10.0%) had developed junctional failure. Of these 23 patients, 16 had had partial ankylosis and 7 had had complete ankylosis. PJF had developed in 10 patients and DJF in 13. The most common type of junctional failure was a junctional fracture, which developed in 12 patients. PJF had developed by UIV fracture in 4 patients, UIV+1 fracture in 1 patient, and UIV+2 in 1 patient. DJF had developed by LIV fracture in 6 patients, metallic failure in 5, and progression of DJF in 2 patients. The average time to the development of PJF and DJF was 13 months and 12.4 months, respectively. All 10 patients with PJF and 7 of 13 patients with DJF (53.8%) had required reoperation. Of the 12 patients with junctional fracture, 11 (91.7%) had undergone reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the 23 patients with junctional failure, 16 had had immature ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament. Therefore, to prevent junctional failure, the state of ankylosis seems to be important for selecting the fusion level after osteotomy. Once junctional failure has developed, however, reoperation should be considered owing to the stress concentration at the UIV or LIV.

Mechanical revision following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a competing risk survival analysis in 171 consecutive adult spinal deformity patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. PSO allow major surgical correction of ASD, although; the risk of mechanical complications remains considerable. Previous reports have been based on smaller cohorts or multicenter databases and none have utilized competing risk (CR) survival analysis.

METHODS

All ASD patients undergoing PSO surgery from 2010 to 2015 at a single, tertiary institution were included. Demographics, long standing radiographs as well as intra- and postoperative complications were registered for all. A CR-model was used to estimate the incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure and two predefined multivariable models were used to assess radiographic prediction of failure and reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included with 2-year follow-up available for 91% (mean [IQR]: 35 [24-50] months). Mechanical failure occurred in 111 cases (65%) at any time in follow-up, the most frequent being rod breakage affecting 81 patients (47%). Cumulative incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure was estimated to 34% at 2 years and 58% at 5 years. A multivariable proportional odds model with death as competing risk showed significantly increased odds of revision with fusion to the sacrum (OR: 5.42; 95% CI 1.89-15.49) and preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) > 20° (OR: 2.41; 95% CI 1.13-5.16). History of previous surgery, number of instrumented vertebra, as well as postoperative SRS-Schwab modifiers and Global Alignment and Proportion score were not associated with significant effects on odds of revision.

CONCLUSIONS

In a consecutive single-center cohort of patients undergoing PSO for ASD, we found an estimated incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical failure of 34% 2 years postoperatively. Fusion to the sacrum and preoperative PT > 20° were associated with elevated risks of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic III.

The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Patients undergoing long-segment fusions from the lower thoracic (LT) spine to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction are at risk for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). One mechanism of PJK is fracture of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or higher (UIV+1), which may be related to bone mineral density (BMD). Because Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT correlate with BMD, the authors evaluated whether HU values were correlated with PJK after long fusions for ASD.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective study of patients older than 50 years who had undergone ASD correction from the LT spine to the sacrum in the period from October 2007 to January 2018 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic and spinopelvic parameters were measured. HU values were measured on preoperative CT at the UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 (2 levels above the UIV) levels and were assessed for correlations with PJK.

RESULTS

The records of 127 patients were reviewed. Fifty-four patients (19 males and 35 females) with a mean age of 64.91 years and mean follow-up of 3.19 years met the study inclusion criteria; there were 29 patients with PJK and 25 patients without. There was no statistically significant difference in demographics or follow-up between these two groups. Neither was there a difference between the groups with regard to postoperative pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI minus LL (PI-LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), or sagittal vertical axis (SVA; all p > 0.05). Postoperative pelvic tilt (p = 0.003) and T1 pelvic angle (p = 0.014) were significantly higher in patients with PJK than in those without. Preoperative HUs at UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 were 120.41, 124.52, and 129.28 in the patients with PJK, respectively, and 152.80, 155.96, and 160.00 in the patients without PJK, respectively (p = 0.011, 0.02, and 0.018). Three receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for preoperative HU values at the UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2 as a predictor for PJK were established, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.710 (95% CI 0.574–0.847), 0.679 (95% CI 0.536–0.821), and 0.681 (95% CI 0.539–0.824), respectively. The optimal HU value by Youden index was 104 HU at the UIV (sensitivity 0.840, specificity 0.517), 113 HU at the UIV+1 (sensitivity 0.720, specificity 0.517), and 110 HU at the UIV+2 (sensitivity 0.880, specificity 0.448).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing long-segment fusions from the LT spine to the sacrum for ASD, PJK was associated with lower HU values on CT at the UIV, UIV+1, and UIV+2. The measurement of HU values on preoperative CTs may be a useful adjunct for ASD surgery planning.

Distal Junctional Failure Following Pediatric Spinal Fusion

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment pathology is a known complication after spinal fusion, but little has been reported on junctional failure. A series of adolescent patients presented with acute distal junctional failure (DJF). We sought to determine any common features of these patients to develop a prevention strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of pediatric patients who developed DJF after instrumented spinal fusion performed at 2 institutions from 1999 to 2013. Patients with proximal junctional failure or junctional kyphosis without failure were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifteen subjects were identified with mean follow-up of 38 months. Distal failure occurred a mean of 60 days after index surgery, with history of minor trauma in 4 patients. Failures included 3-column Chance fracture (11) or instrumentation failure (4). Thirteen patients presented with back pain and/or acute kyphosis, whereas 2 asymptomatic patients presented with healed fractures. Two patients also developed new onset of severe lower extremity neurological deficit after fracture, which improved but never resolved after revision. A total of 13/15 subjects required revision surgery, typically within 1 week. Complications associated with revision surgery were encountered in 8 patients (62%). Major complications that required return to the operating room included 2 deep infections, 2 instrumentation failures, and dense lower extremity paralysis that improved after medial screw revision and decompression. At final follow-up, 10 patients are asymptomatic, 2 have persistent neurological deficit, 2 have chronic pain, and 1 has altered gait with gait aid requirement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study analyzes a heterogenous cohort of spinal fusion patients who developed DJF from 3-column Chance fracture or instrumentation failure. Revision surgery is typically required, but has a high complication rate and can result in severe neurological deficit, highlighting the morbidity of this complication. It is unclear whether level of the lowest instrumented vertebra contributes to DJF. Increased awareness of junctional failure in children may prompt additional studies to further characterize risk factors and preventative strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-study-type case series.

Surgical Intervention for Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures in Middle-low Lumbar Spine with Special Reference to Postoperative Complications Affecting Surgical Outcomes

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological features of osteoporotic burst fractures affecting levels below the second lumbar (middle-low lumbar) vertebrae, and to clarify the appropriate surgical procedure to avoid postoperative complications. Thirty-eight consecutive patients (nine male, 29 female; mean age: 74.8 years; range: 60-86 years) with burst fractures affecting the middle-low lumbar vertebrae who underwent posterior-instrumented fusion were included. Using the Magerl classification system, these fractures were classified into three types: 16 patients with superior incomplete burst fracture (superior-type), 11 patients with inferior incomplete burst fracture (inferior-type) and 11 patients with complete burst fracture (complete-type). The clinical features were investigated for each type, and postoperative complications such as postoperative vertebral collapse (PVC) and instrumentation failure were assessed after a mean follow-up period of 3.1 years (range: 1-8.1 years). All patients suffered from severe leg pain by radiculopathy, except one with superior-type fracture who exhibited cauda equina syndrome. Nineteen of 27 patients with superior- or inferior-type fracture were found to have spondylolisthesis due to segmental instability. Although postoperative neurological status improved significantly, lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis at the fused level deteriorated from the postoperative period to the final follow-up due to postoperative complications caused mainly by PVC (29%) and instrument failure (37%). Posterior-instrumented fusion led to a good clinical outcome; however, a higher incidence of postoperative complications due to bone fragility was inevitable. Therefore, short-segment instrument and fusion with some augumentation techniqus, together with strong osteoporotic medications may be required to avoid such complications.

Prospective assessment of the safety and early outcomes of sublaminar band placement for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis

OBJECTIVE

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) can progress to proximal junctional failure (PJF), a widely recognized early and serious complication of multisegment spinal instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD). Sublaminar band placement has been suggested as a possible technique to prevent PJK and PJF but carries the theoretical possibility of a paradoxical increase in these complications as a result of the required muscle dissection and posterior ligamentous disruption. In this study, the authors prospectively assess the safety as well as the early clinical and radiological outcomes of sublaminar band insertion at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) plus 1 level (UIV+1).

METHODS

Between August 2015 and February 2017, 40 consecutive patients underwent either upper (T2–4) or lower (T8–10) thoracic sublaminar band placement at the UIV+1 during long-segment thoracolumbar arthrodesis surgery. Outcome measures were prospectively collected and uploaded to a web-based REDCap database specifically designed to include demographic, clinical, and radiological data. All patients underwent clinical assessment, as well as radiological assessment with anteroposterior and lateral 36-inch whole-spine standing radiographs both pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty patients (24 women and 16 men) were included in this study. Median age at surgery was 64.0 years with an IQR of 57.7–70.0 years. Median follow-up was 12 months (IQR 6–15 months). Three procedure-related complications were noted, including 2 intraoperative cerebrospinal spinal fluid leaks and 1 transient neurological deficit. Median visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain significantly improved after surgery (preoperatively: 8.0, IQR 6.0–10.0; 1-year follow-up: 2.0, IQR 0.0–6.0; p = 0.001). Median Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a) scores also significantly improved after surgery (preoperatively: 56.0, IQR 45.0–64.0; 1-year follow-up: 46.0, IQR 22.2–54.0; p < 0.001). Sagittal vertical axis (preoperatively: 9.0 cm, IQR 5.3–11.6 cm; final follow-up: 4.7 cm, IQR 2.0–6.6 cm; p < 0.001), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (24.7°, IQR 11.2°–31.2°; 7.7°, IQR −1.2° to 19.5°; p < 0.001), and pelvic tilt (28.7°, IQR 20.4°–32.6°; 17.1°, IQR 10.8°–25.2°; p < 0.001) were all improved at the final follow-up. While proximal junctional (PJ) Cobb angles increased overall at the final follow-up (preoperatively: 4.2°, IQR 1.9°–7.4°; final follow-up: 8.0°, IQR 5.8°–10.3°; p = 0.002), the significant increase was primarily noted starting at the immediate postoperative time point (7.2°, IQR 4.4°–11.8°; p = 0.001) and not beyond. Three patients (7.5%) developed radiological PJK (mean ΔPJ Cobb 15.5°), while there were no instances of PJF in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Sublaminar band placement at the UIV+1 during long-segment thoracolumbar instrumented arthrodesis is relatively safe and is not associated with an increased rate of PJK. Moreover, no subjects developed PJF. Prospective large-scale and long-term analysis is needed to define the potential benefit of sublaminar bands in reducing the incidence of PJK and PJF following surgery for ASD.

Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02411799 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Hart-ISSG Proximal Junctional Failure Severity Scale

STUDY DESIGN

Reliability/external validation study.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate inter- and intrarater reliability of the Hart-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) Proximal Junctional Failure Severity Scale (PJFSS) and its correlation with operative revision in patients with proximal junctional failure (PJF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Hart-ISSG PJFSS is a validated classification system for PJF. Reliability of the PJFSS has not been assessed.

METHODS

Sixteen detailed clinical scenarios were assessed using the ISSG PJFSS classification in six categories: neurologic status, axial pain, instrumentation issue, proximal kyphotic angle, level of upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), and severity of UIV/UIV+1 fracture. Eleven spine surgeons evaluated each case in all six categories during two different assessments, and provided recommendations regarding operative revision or observation for each case. Inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated based on intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

All intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated "almost perfect"' (0.817-0.988) inter-rater agreement for both assessments, except UIV/UIV+1 fracture severity during the second assessment, which demonstrated "substantial" agreement' (0.692). Five of six categories had "almost perfect" mean intrarater reliability (0.805-0.981), while "instrumentation issue" demonstrated "substantial" mean agreement (0.757). Inter-rater reliability for recommendation of surgical intervention was "almost perfect" during both assessments (0.911 and 0.922, respectively). Mean PJFSS scores between the two assessments were significantly higher for cases recommended for operative revision (8.43 ± 0.90) versus cases recommended for observation (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The ISSG PJFSS is a reliable and repeatable classification system for assessing patients with PJF. Higher PJFSS scales correlate with recommendation for operative revision, extending prior external validation of the PJFSS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Radiographic Measurements in Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Reliability study of radiographic measures of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess impacts of level of proximal endpoint and vertebral fracture on reliability of measurement of junctional kyphosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Radiographic assessment is important in determining management of patients with PJK or proximal junctional failure (PJF). No study to date has evaluated the reliability of radiographic measurement of the junctional kyphotic angle after surgery for ASD.

METHODS

Postoperative radiographs from 52 patients with ASD were divided into four categories based on the level of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and the presence or absence of PJF: upper thoracic without failure (UT), thoracolumbar without failure (TL), upper thoracic with PJF (UTF), and thoracolumbar with PJF (TLF). Nine surgeon reviewers performed radiographic measurements of kyphosis between UIV+2 and UIV twice at least 4 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine inter- and intraobserver reliability.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability for measurements of UT, TL, UTF, and TLF were all "almost perfect" with ICC scores of 0.917, 0.965, 0.956, and 0.882, and 0.932, 0.975, 0958, and 0.989, for sessions 1 and 2, respectively. Similarly, ICCs for kyphosis measurements for the TL and TLF group had "almost perfect" agreement with means of 0.898 (range: 0.817-0.969) and 0.976 (range: 0.931-0.995), respectively. ICCs for measurements for the UT and UTF groups all had "substantial" or "almost perfect" agreement with means of 0.801 (range: 0.662-0.942) and 0.879 (range: 0.760-0.988), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates high inter- and intraobserver reliability of PJK measurement following instrumented fusion for ASD, independent of the presence or absence of PJF. Although slightly lower for upper thoracic than for thoracolumbar proximal endpoints, all ICCs consistently reached at least "substantial agreement" and "near perfect agreement" for most.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Prophylactic vertebral cement augmentation at the uppermost instrumented vertebra and rostral adjacent vertebra for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure following long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are common problems after long-segment (>5 levels) thoracolumbar instrumented fusions in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD). No specific surgical strategy has definitively been shown to lower the risk of PJK as the result of a multifactorial etiology.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to assess the incidence of PJK and PJF in patients treated with prophylactic polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement augmentation at the uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) and rostral adjacent vertebrae (UIV+1).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective cohort-matched surgical case series at an academic institutional setting.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty-five adult patients over a 16-year enrollment period were identified with long-segment (>5 levels) posterior thoracolumbar instrumented fusions for ASD.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes measures were PJK magnitude and PJF formation. Secondary outcomes measures were spinopelvic parameters, as well as global and regional sagittal alignment.

METHODS

The impact of adjunctive PMMA use in long-segment (≥5 levels) fusion for ASD was assessed in adult patients aged 18 and older. Patients were included with at least one of the following: lumbar scoliosis >20°, pelvic tilt >25°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, central sacral vertical line >2 cm, and thoracic kyphosis >60°. The frequency of PJF and the magnitude of PJK were measured radiographically preoperatively, postoperatively, and at maximum follow-up in controls (Group A) and PMMA at the UIV and UIV+1 (Group B).

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients (64±11.1 years) with ASD were identified: 47 control patients (58±10.6) and 38 patients (71±6.8) treated with PMMA at the UIV and UIV+1. The mean follow-up was 27.9 and 24.2 months in Groups A and B, respectively (p=.10). Preoperative radiographic parameters were not significantly different, except the pelvic tilt which was greater in Group A (26.6° vs. 31.4°, p=.03). Postoperatively, the lumbopelvic mismatch was greater in Group B (14.6° vs. 7.9°, p=.037), whereas the magnitude of PJK was greater in controls (9.36° vs. 5.65°, p=.023). The incidence of PJK was 36% (n=17) and 23.7% (n=9) in Groups A and B, respectively (p=.020). The odds ratio of PJK with vertebroplasty was 0.548 (95% confidence interval=0.211 to 1.424). Proximal junctional kyphosis was observed in 6 (12.8%) controls only (p=.031). The UIV+1 angle, a measure of PJK, was significantly greater in controls (10.0° vs. 6.8°, p=.02). No difference in blood loss was observed. No complications were attributed to PMMA use.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of prophylactic vertebral cement augmentation at the UIV and rostral adjacent vertebral segment at the time of deformity correction appears to be preventative in the development of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure.

The effect of prophylactic vertebroplasty on the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure following posterior spinal fusion in adult spinal deformity: a 5-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) ranges from 5% to 46% following adult spinal deformity surgery. Approximately 66% to 76% of PJK occurs within 3 months of surgery. A subset of these patients, reportedly 26% to 47%, develop proximal junctional failure (PJF) within 6 months postoperatively. To date, there are no studies evaluating the impact of prophylactic vertebroplasty on PJK and PJF incidence at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes, and incidence of PJK and PJF, after prophylactic vertebroplasty for long-segment thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion (PSF).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Thirty-nine patients, of whom 87% were female, who underwent two-level prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented and supra-adjacent vertebrae at the time of index PSF were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), and Short-Form (SF) 36 questionnaires, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including PJK angle, and coronal and sagittal alignment, were calculated, along with relevant perioperative complications and revision rates.

METHODS

Of the 41 patients who received two-level prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented and supra-adjacent vertebrae at the time of index PSF, and comprised a cohort with previously published 2-year follow-up data, 39 (95%) completed 5-year follow-up (average: 67.6 months). Proximal junctional kyphosis was defined as a change in the PJK angle ≥10° between the immediate postoperative and final follow-up radiograph. Proximal junctional failure was defined as acute proximal junctional fracture, fixation failure, or kyphosis requiring extension of fusion within the first 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with a mean age of 65.6 (41-87) years were included in this study. Of the 39 patients, 28.2% developed PJK (11: 7.7% at 2 years, 20.5% between 2 and 5 years), and 5.1% developed acute PJF. Two of the 11 PJK patients required revision for progressive worsening of the PJK. There were no proximal junctional fractures. There was no significant difference in preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up measurements of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and coronal or sagittal alignment between patients who developed PJK, PJF, or neither (p>.05). There was no significant difference in ODI, SRS-22, or SF-36 scores between those with and without PJK or PJF (p>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term follow-up demonstrates that prophylactic vertebroplasty may minimize the risk for junctional failure in the early postoperative period. However, it does not appear to decrease the incidence of PJK at 5 years.

Vertebral fracture at the caudal end of a surgical fusion for thoracic vertebral fracture in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)

The patient was an 86-year-old woman with back pain after a fall. She had no neurological findings at the initial visit. Plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and a Th10 fracture. Two weeks later, she started gait exercise with immobilization by a rigid orthosis. Twenty-five days later, she presented with paralysis and numbness of her legs. Computed tomography (CT) showed anterior expansion in the vertebral body of Th10. MRI showed an intramedullary high-intensity area on T2-weighted images at the same level. She was diagnosed as having delayed paraplegia after a Th10 fracture and transferred to our hospital for surgery. Laminectomy of Th10, posterior fusion from Th7 to L1 with pedicle screws and hooks to Th6 and L1 laminae, anterior fusion from Th9 to Th11 with a plate, and autologous bone grafting were performed simultaneously. The patient's paralysis improved, and she started gait exercise with no limitation of bed rest and without an orthosis after surgery. At 8 days after surgery, she again presented with low back pain and paralysis in her legs. CT revealed an L1 fracture, which was the caudal end of the surgical fusion. The decreased kyphosis after surgery compared to that at pre-injury might have caused a subsequent horizontal shear force to L1 when the patient sat on the bed and when she walked. In conclusion, to avoid postoperative adjacent vertebral fracture after fusion, appropriate correction of spinal alignment to that at pre-injury is needed for vertebral fractures in patients with DISH.

Association between bicortical screw fixation at upper instrumented vertebra and risk for upper instrumented vertebra fracture

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) fractures associated with UIV screw fixation (unicortical vs bicortical) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation after adult spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

A single-center, single-surgeon consecutive series of adult patients who underwent lumbar fusion for ≥ 4 levels (that is, the lower instrumented vertebra at the sacrum or pelvis and the UIV of the thoracolumbar spine [T9–L2]) were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, follow-up duration, sagittal UIV angle immediately postoperatively including several balance-related parameters (lumbar lordosis [LL], pelvic incidence, and sagittal vertical axis), bone mineral density, UIV screw fixation type, UIV PMMA augmentation, and UIV fracture were evaluated. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group U, 15 patients with unicortical screw fixation at the UIV; Group P, 16 with bicortical screw fixation and PMMA augmentation at the UIV; and Group B, 21 with bicortical screw fixation without PMMA augmentation at the UIV.

RESULTS

The mean number of levels fused was 6.5 ± 2.5, 7.5 ± 2.5, and 6.5 ± 2.5; the median age was 50 ± 29, 72 ± 6, and 59 ± 24 years; and the mean follow-up was 31.5 ± 23.5, 13 ± 6, and 24 ± 17.5 months in Groups U, P, and B, respectively (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in balance-related parameters (LL, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence–LL, and so on) among the groups. UIV fracture rates in Groups U (0%), P (31.3%), and B (42.9%) increased in sequence by group (p = 0.006). UIV bicortical screw fixation increased the risk for UIV fracture (OR 5.39; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Bicortical screw fixation at the UIV is a major risk factor for early UIV compression fracture, regardless of whether a thoracolumbosacral orthosis is used. To reduce the proximal junctional failure, unicortical screw fixation at the UIV is essential in adult spinal deformity correction surgery.

Economic Impact of Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Cost Analysis of 57 Operations in a 10-year Experience at a Major Deformity Center

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the economic impact of revision surgery for proximal junctional failures (PJF) after thoracolumbar fusions for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJF after fusions for ASD is a major cause of disability. Although clinical sequelae are described, PJF-revision operation costs are incompletely defined.

METHODS

Consecutive adults who underwent thoracolumbar fusions for ASD (August, 2003 to January, 2013) were evaluated. Inclusion criteria include construct from pelvis to L2 or above and minimum 6 months follow-up after the index ASD operation. Direct costs (surgical supplies/implants, room/care, pharmacy, services) were identified from medical billing data and calculated for index ASD operations and subsequent surgeries for PJF. Not included in direct cost data were indirect costs, charges, surgeon fees, or revision operations for indications other than PJF (i.e., pseudarthrosis). Patients were compared based on the construct's upper-instrumented vertebra: upper thoracic (UT: T1-6) versus thoracolumbar junction (TLjxn: T9-L2).

RESULTS

Of 501 patients, 382 met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one patients [UT:14; TLjxn: 40 at index; average follow-up 32.6 months (6-92 months)] had revisions for PJF, which summed to $3.2 million total direct cost. Average direct cost of index operations for the cohort ($68,294) was significantly greater than PJF-revisions ($55,547). Compared with TLjxn, UT had a significantly higher average cost for index operations ($79,860 vs. $65,868). However, PJF-revision cases were similar in average cost (UT:$60,103; TLjxn:$53,920; P = 0.09). Costs of PJF amounted to an additional 12.1% of the total index surgical cost in 382 patients.

CONCLUSION

Revision operations for PJF after long thoracolumbar fusions for ASD are associated with an average direct cost of $55,547 per case. Revision costs for PJF are similar based on the index procedure's upper-instrumented vertebra level. At a major tertiary center over a 10-year period, PJF came at a very significant economic expense amounting to $3.2 million for 57 cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

An Approach to Lumbar Revision Spine Surgery in Adults

Along with the increase in lifestyle expectations in the aging population, a dramatic rise in surgical rates has been observed over the past 2 decades. Consequently, the rate of revision spine surgery is expected to increase. A systematic approach to treatment is required for the adult patient presenting with late or chronic complications after spinal surgery. Patient assessment includes elucidating current symptoms and knowledge of the previous surgery, performing a detailed assessment, and obtaining appropriate studies. Subsequently, differential diagnoses are formulated based on whether the pathology arises from the same levels or adjacent levels of the spine and whether it relates to the previous decompression or fusion. Finally, familiarity with different surgical approaches is imperative in treating the common pathologies encountered in this patient population.

T12 Sagittal Tilt Predicts Thoracic Kyphosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review and analysis of lateral long cassette radiographs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to assess whether certain radiographic features routinely seen on lumbar radiographs can predict a structural thoracic deformity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Obtaining proper sagittal alignment is an essential factor contributing to favorable clinical outcomes following spinal deformity surgery. The majority of patients treated with lumbar fusions do not undergo long cassette radiographs, and therefore physicians must rely upon clinical examination to determine the presence of a structural thoracic kyphotic deformity.

METHODS

A total of 193 consecutive lateral long cassette radiographs of outpatients without prior spine surgery presenting to a spine surgeon were independently reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed on sagittal parameters that included the T12 slope, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, T2-T12 and T5-T12 kyphosis, and T12-S1 lordosis, and correlated with patient demographics.

RESULTS

The age of the patient combined with the sagittal slope of T12 can be used to assess a patient's risk of having a structural thoracic deformity defined in this series as >35 degrees from T5 to T12 and >40 degrees from T2 to T12. Based on our findings, for a given 20-year-old patient, the threshold T12 sagittal angle was about 17-18 degrees. This angle decreased 2-3 degrees per decade so that the threshold value was 12-13 degrees by age 40, 7-9 degrees by age 60, and 3-4 degrees by age 80.

CONCLUSION

Age and the sagittal slope of the 12th thoracic vertebra are effective predictors of kyphosis between T2-T12 and T5-T12. This information may be used to determine the need for long cassette radiographs to further examine the possible presence of kyphotic deformity in the thoracic spine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Assessment of impact of standing long-cassette radiographs on surgical planning for lumbar pathology: an international survey of spine surgeons

OBJECT

The associations among global spinal alignment, patient-reported disability, and surgical outcomes have increasingly gained attention. The assessment of global spinal alignment requires standing long-cassette anteroposterior and lateral radiographs; however, spine surgeons routinely rely only on short-segment imaging when evaluating seemingly isolated lumbar pathology. This may prohibit adequate surgical planning and may predispose surgeons to not recognize associated pathology in the thoracic spine and sagittal spinopelvic malalignment. The authors used a case-based survey questionnaire to evaluate if including long-cassette radiographs led to changes to respondents' operative plans as compared with their chosen plan when cases contained standard imaging of the involved lumbar spine only.

METHODS

A case-based survey was distributed to AOSpine International members that consisted of 15 cases of lumbar spine pathology and lumbar imaging only. The same 15 cases were then shuffled and presented a second time with additional long-cassette radiographs. Each case required participants to select a single operative plan with 5 choices ranging from least to most extensive. The cases included 5 “control” cases with normal global spinal alignment and 10 “test” cases with significant sagittal and/or coronal malalignment. Mean scores were determined for each question with higher scores representing more invasive and/or extensive operative plans.

RESULTS

Of 712 spine surgeons who started the survey, 316 (44%) completed the entire series, including 68% of surgeons with spine fellowship training and representation from more than 40 countries. For test cases, but not for control cases, there were significantly higher average surgical invasiveness scores for cases presented with long-cassette radiographs (4.2) as compared with those cases with lumbar imaging only (3.4; p = 0.002). The addition of long-cassette radiographs resulted in 82.1% of respondents recommending instrumentation up to the thoracic spine, a 23.2% increase as compared with the same cases presented with lumbar imaging only (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the importance of maintaining a low threshold for performing standing long-cassette imaging when assessing seemingly isolated lumbar pathology. Such imaging is necessary for the assessment of spinopelvic and global spinal alignment, which can be important in operative planning. Deformity, particularly positive sagittal malalignment, may go undetected unless one maintains a high index of suspicion and obtains long-cassette radiographs. It is recommended that spine surgeons recognize the prevalence and importance of such deformity when contemplating operative intervention.

Prevention of Acute Proximal Junctional Fractures After Long Thoracolumbar Posterior Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity Using 2-level Cement Augmentation at the Upper Instrumented Vertebra and the Vertebra 1 Level Proximal to the Upper Instrumented Vertebra

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy of proximal junction fracture (PJF) prevention in adult spinal deformity (ASD) using 2-level cement augmentation at the construct's proximal extent.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prevention of PJF after thoracolumbar fusions is critical because they may result in neurological injury. Cement augmentation of constructs' proximal vertebrae is postulated to decrease PJF.

METHODS

Patients with ASD after PSF from pelvis to thoracolumbar junction with 6 months or more follow-up were retrospectively studied. Demographics, deformity radiographical parameters, and health-related quality of life outcomes (HRQoL) scores were compared with patients with no cement, 2-level cement augmentation at upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and vertebra 1 level proximal to UIV (UIV+1), and cement at another location ("Other"). Revision surgery for PJF was primary outcome. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

51 patients [female-29; male-22; average age: 65 yr (33-82)] met inclusion criteria (2-level-19; no-cement-23; "Other"-9). Average follow-up (mo) was longer for no-cement (25 ± 15) and "Other" (20 ± 16) than 2-level (15 ± 8) (P = 0.06). All perioperative radiographical parameters were similar, save first postoperative thoracic kyphosis and lumbopelvic mismatch. Compared with 2-level cement, non-2-level cement had significantly more revisions for PJF (0% vs. 19%; P = 0.02). After UIV adjustment, risks of PJF revision surgery were 13.1 times higher for "Other" (95% CI: 0.5-346.5, P = 0.12) and 9.2 times higher (95% CI: 0.4-239.1, P = 0.18) for no-cement. All HRQoL scores improved in 2-level cement; only back/leg pain significantly improved in non-2-level cement. Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index was significantly less in 2-level cement.

CONCLUSION

The use of 2-level cement augmentation (UIV and UIV+1) in PSF from pelvis to thoracolumbar junction for ASD is associated with a decreased rate of acute proximal junctional fractures and associated revision surgeries. As only associations can be demonstrated from this study's design, prospective investigations with larger, consecutive cohorts should be performed to explore causal relationships.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders: Mini-open TLIF and Corrective TLIF

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) as a short fusion is widely accepted among the spine surgeons. However in the long fusion for degenerative kyphoscoliosis, corrective spinal fixation by an open method is thought to be frequently selected. Our objective is to study whether the mini-open TLIF and corrective TLIF contribute to the improvement of the spinal segmental and global alignment. We divided the patients who performed lumbar fixation surgery into three groups. Group 1 (G1) consisted of mini-open TLIF procedures without complication. Group 2 (G2) consisted of corrective TLIF without complication. Group 3 (G3) consisted of corrective TLIF with instrumentation-related complication postoperatively. In all groups, the lumbar lordosis (LL) highly correlated with developing surgical complications. LL significantly changed postoperatively in all groups, but was not corrected in the normal range in G3. There were statistically significant differences in preoperative and postoperative LL and mean difference between the pelvic incidence (PI) and LL between G3 and other groups. The most important thing not to cause the instrumentation-related failure is proper correction of the sagittal balance. In the cases with minimal sagittal imbalance with or without coronal imbalance, short fusion by mini-open TLIF or long fusion by corrective TLIF contributes to good clinical results if the lesion is short or easily correctable. However, if the patients have apparent sagittal imbalance with or without coronal imbalance, we should perform proper correction of the sagittal spinal alignment introducing various technologies.

The importance of proximal fusion level selection for outcomes of multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion

Background

There are few studies about risk factors for poor outcomes from multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion limited to three or four level lumbar posterolateral fusions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion and to search for possible risk factors for poor surgical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 37 consecutive patients who underwent multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral posterolateral fusion with posterior instrumentation. The outcomes were deemed either 'good' or 'bad' based on clinical and radiological results. Many demographic and radiological factors were analyzed to examine potential risk factors for poor outcomes. Student t-test, Fisher exact test, and the chi-square test were used based on the nature of the variables. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to exclude confounding factors.

Results

Twenty cases showed a good outcome (group A, 54.1%) and 17 cases showed a bad outcome (group B, 45.9%). The overall fusion rate was 70.3%. The revision procedures (group A: 1/20, 5.0%; group B: 4/17, 23.5%), proximal fusion to L2 (group A: 5/20, 25.0%; group B: 10/17, 58.8%), and severity of stenosis (group A: 12/19, 63.3%; group B: 3/11, 27.3%) were adopted as possible related factors to the outcome in univariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that only the proximal fusion level (superior instrumented vertebra, SIV) was a significant risk factor. The cases in which SIV was L2 showed inferior outcomes than those in which SIV was L3. The odds ratio was 6.562 (95% confidence interval, 1.259 to 34.203).

Conclusions

The overall outcome of multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral posterolateral fusion was not as high as we had hoped it would be. Whether the SIV was L2 or L3 was the only significant risk factor identified for poor outcomes in multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral posterolateral fusion in the current study. Thus, the authors recommend that proximal fusion levels be carefully determined when multi-level lumbar fusions are considered.

Outcomes and complications following posterior long lumbar fusions exceeding three levels

The outcomes and complications of posterior-only lumbar instrumented long fusions exceeding three segments with selective segmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, kyphosis, or both combined with spondylolisthesis were analyzed to investigate risk factors associated with surgical instrumentation failure. Fifteen consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, kyphosis, or both combined with spondylolisthesis were studied retrospectively. There were 5 male and 10 female patients, with a mean age of 71.8 years. All the patients were followed for a mean duration of 19.4 months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluation included coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT). The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1—7 patients with surgical complications; group 2—8 patients without complications. The preoperative and postoperative coronal Cobb's angle were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2. The LL highly correlated with developing surgical complications. There were statistically significant differences in preoperative and postoperative LL and the mean difference between PI and the LL (PI–LL) between groups 1 and 2. Linear correlation and regression analysis showed that there was no correlation between JOA score and the coronal Cobb angle in degenerative scoliosis patients. However, we found a positive correlation between JOA and LL. Our series of long lumbar fusions had a high complication and instrumentation failure. Creating adequate LL angle in harmony with PI was a key to prevent surgical complications and attain neurological improvement.

Use of vertebroplasty to prevent proximal junctional fractures in adult deformity surgery: a biomechanical cadaveric study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral compression fractures at the proximal junction are common complications of long spinal fusion surgeries that can contribute to the development of proximal junctional kyphosis or proximal junctional failure. To our knowledge, no biomechanical studies have addressed the effect of vertebral augmentation at the proximal junction.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic vertebroplasty in reducing the incidence of vertebral compression fractures at the proximal junction after a long spinal fusion in a cadaveric spine model.

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical cadaveric study.

METHODS

We divided 18 cadaveric spine specimens into three groups of six spines each: a control group, a group treated with one-level prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented vertebra, and a group treated with two-level prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented vertebra and the supra-adjacent vertebra. In all spines, the pedicles were instrumented from L5 to T10. Using eccentric axial loading, the specimens were then compressed until failure. Failure was defined as a precipitous decrease in load with increasing compression. The effect of augmentation on load-to-failure was checked using linear regression. The effect of augmentation on incidence of adjacent fractures was checked using logistic regression. Differences at the level of p<.05 were considered significant. KyphX cement introducer was donated by Kyphon, and the pedicle screws were donated by DePuy.

RESULTS

Fractures occurred in 12 of 18 specimens: five in the control group, six in the one-level group, and only one in the two-level group; these differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic vertebroplasty at the upper instrumented level and its supra-adjacent vertebra reduced the incidence of junctional fractures after long posterior spinal instrumentation in this axially loaded cadaveric model. Additional studies are necessary to determine if these results are translatable to clinical practice.

Preliminary Results of the Effect of Prophylactic Vertebroplasty on the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Complications After Posterior Spinal Fusion to the Low Thoracic Spine

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in adults undergoing posterior spinal fusions, 1) the effect of prophylactic vertebroplasty on the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF), and 2) the difference in outcomes between those who did and did not develop PJK or PJF.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Proximal junctional kyphosis occurs in 20% to 39% of adults after posterior spinal fusions; a subset develops PJF.

METHODS

From 2005 through 2008, we treated 41 consecutive patients (40 years old or more) with spinal deformity with 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty (at the upper instrumented vertebrae and the supra-adjacent vertebrae) during posterior spinal fusion. The 38 patients with 24 months' follow-up formed our study group. We measured patient outcomes with the Scoliosis Research Society-24 questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the 12-item Short Form Survey. All patients completed each assessment preoperatively, and 89% or more did so postoperatively. We compared postoperative and final follow-up radiographs to identify the PJK incidence (ie, a PJK angle change of 10° or more), and analyzed the PJK, PJF, and non-PJK/PJF groups for outcome scores with Student t test and chi-square test (significance, p < .05).

RESULTS

Three patients (8%) developed PJK and 2 (5%) developed PJF, markedly lower incidences than those previously reported. At final follow-up, patients with PJK or PJF reported statistically significant lower pain and satisfaction Scoliosis Research Society-24 scores than did patients in the non-PJK/PJF group, but there were no significant differences in Scoliosis Research Society-24 mental health or function scores between groups. All patients had significant improved Oswestry Disability Index and 12-item Short Form Survey scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic vertebroplasty in long posterior spinal fusions for adult spinal deformity resulted in a low incidence of PJF and PJK, with only small differences in outcome scores between those who did and did not develop PJK and PJF.

Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Junctional spinal disorders have become one of the greatest challenges in spinal deformity surgery. They can occur at any age but are mostly seen in adult deformity surgery and are most often observed as the patient gets older.

DEFINITIONS

Different forms can be individualized according to their types and location: one can observe simple segmental degeneration above or below instrumentation with or without spinal stenosis. Or the situation may be more complex with proximal junctional kyphosis, distal junctional kyphosis and intercalary junctional kyphosis where the junctional kyphosis occurs between two instrumented segments of the spine. Junctional scoliosis may also be observed as a new curve that did not exist after the index surgery.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Many different factors have been described being associated or the cause of junctional problems: old age, increased BMI, osteoporosis, etc. The role of pre-existing and postoperative sagittal imbalance plays a definitive role in their pathogenesis. As well the weakened posterior elements and or fatty degeneration of the posterior muscles are key factors in the occurrence of these problems. Multiple different radiologic parameters to describe and achieve perfect sagittal balance have been described knowing that the pelvic incidence of the patients is the key element that governs lumbar lordosis of the patient and hence the sagittal balance. Away from the spine one has to integrate the issues of the knees and the hips in the presentation of these junctional problems whether they are the cause or one of the consequences of the sagittal malalignment. Likewise the non-instrumented part of the spine (thoracic and or cervical spine) will also play a role in the pathogenesis or prevention of these junctional problems if they are stiff and or autofused along with their respective deformity.

TREATMENT

To prevent the occurrence of such junctional problems some basic surgical rules must be observed, but still lots remain unknown such as how much restoration of lordosis is really necessary, how to create a smoother transition between the instrumented and non-instrumented spine, which metal and where to use it, which implants to use as our widely used pedicle screw system may be one of the causes of these problems. Clinically these junctional problems can be asymptomatic and require only observation, or require revision surgery. Revision will require in most cases decompression of the neural elements, extension of the instrumentation and spinal osteotomies.

CONCLUSION

Definitively the issue of junctional spinal disorder after deformity surgery will require further extensive research to minimize this problem especially in our aging population.