Platelet-rich plasma combined with hydroxyapatite for lumbar interbody fusion promoted bone formation and decreased an inflammatory pain neuropeptide in rats

Platelet-Rich Plasma - a remedy present in every human being. History, functioning, and the benefits of therapy using it

Platelet-rich plasma is an autologous product used in restorative medicine. It contains a high concentration of platelets, which are rich in growth factors and other biologically active substances known for their ability to stimulate regenerative processes in the body. Currently, research is being conducted into the use of platelet-rich plasma in many areas of medicine. This publication provides information on the nature, mechanism of action, therapeutic properties and application of autologous platelet-rich plasma in medicine. Furthermore, ongoing investigations explore its potential in wound healing, orthopedics, dermatology, and even in dentistry, showcasing its versatility and promising outcomes across various medical disciplines. Additionally, the safety and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma therapies are subjects of continual scrutiny, aiming to refine protocols and expand its clinical utility with robust scientific evidence. The growing interest in this regenerative approach underscores its potential as a valuable tool in modern medical practice. Platelet-rich plasma therapy represents a promising avenue for personalized medicine, offering tailored treatment approaches that capitalize on the body's own healing mechanisms to promote tissue repair and regeneration.

Advances in Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Spinal Diseases: A Systematic Review

Spinal diseases are commonly associated with pain and neurological symptoms, which negatively impact patients' quality of life. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous source of multiple growth factors and cytokines, with the potential to promote tissue regeneration. Recently, PRP has been widely used for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, including spinal diseases, in clinics. Given the increasing popularity of PRP therapy, this article examines the current literature for basic research and emerging clinical applications of this therapy for treating spinal diseases. First, we review in vitro and in vivo studies, evaluating the potential of PRP in repairing intervertebral disc degeneration, promoting bone union in spinal fusion surgeries, and aiding in neurological recovery from spinal cord injury. Second, we address the clinical applications of PRP in treating degenerative spinal disease, including its analgesic effect on low back pain and radicular pain, as well as accelerating bone union during spinal fusion surgery. Basic research demonstrates the promising regenerative potential of PRP, and clinical studies have reported on the safety and efficacy of PRP therapy for treating several spinal diseases. Nevertheless, further high-quality randomized controlled trials would be required to establish clinical evidence of PRP therapy.

Improved intervertebral bone union in ALIF rat model with porous hydroxyapatite/collagen combined with platelet-rich plasma

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) can accelerate bone union in spinal fusion surgery with an autogenous bone graft. However, it is unclear whether bone union can be obtained by using artificial bone and PRP together in spinal interbody fusion surgery.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether interbody fusion can be achieved by transplanting porous hydroxyapatite/collagen(HAp/Col) which is an artificial bone material frequently used in spinal fusion surgery, together with PRP in the intervertebral disc space in rats.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of fourty 10-week old Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study and assigned to three groups as follow: disc curettage only (control group, n=10), disc curettage + HAp/Col transplant (H group, n=10), and disc curettage + HAp/Col + PRP transplant (H+P group, n=10). The other 10 rats were sacrificed as blood donors for acquisition of PRP. Microcomputed tomography (μCT) examinations were performed to evaluate bone union, bone volume (BV), and bone mineral density (BMD) at 4, 8, and 12 weeks following surgery. Twelve weeks postoperatively, each group of three of L4-L5 spines was harvested to perform histological examination (hematoxylin & eosin stain) and the others were subjected to biomechanical testing (compression properties).

RESULTS

The platelet count in PRP was approximately 4.1 times greater than that in whole blood (260.6±26.2 × 10⁴ mg/dL and 64.3±2.9 × 10⁴ mg/dL in PRP and whole blood, respectively). All the L4-L5 lumbar discs were fused in the H+P group, whereas only one case was fused in the H group and none in the control group at 12 weeks after surgery. BV was significantly higher in the H+P group than in the H group or control groups (both p<.01), although BMD was not significantly different among the three groups. Upon histological analysis, mature bone formation was observed at the transplanted space in all cases in the H+P group, whereas fibrous tissue was observed at the location in the H and control groups. Regarding biomechanical properties, the ultimate load to failure was significantly higher in the H+P group than in the H group or control group (p=.021 and .013, respectively), although stiffness was not significantly different between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The combination of porous HAp/Col and PRP at an appropriate concentration can promote bone union in the intervertebral disc space without using an autologous bone graft in the rat model. Bone tissue formation was histologically confirmed, and it was mechanically strong.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This preclinical study showed that porous HAp/Col, when combined with PRP at an appropriate concentration, can induce bone union without autologous bone grafts. The results may eliminate the need for autologous bone collection for spinal fusion surgery in the future.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy with versus without Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is an effective treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with failure of conservative treatment. However, defects in the annulus fibrosus after TELD usually lead to a recurrence of LDH. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has shown promising potential for the repair of injured tissues. The combination of TELD and PRP injection has rarely been reported. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, disc remodeling, and recurrence rate of LDH in TELD with or without PRP in LDH treatment.

Methods

A total of 108 consecutive patients who underwent TELD were prospectively registered between July 2018 and December 2019 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ChiCTR1800017228). Fifty-one and fifty-seven patients underwent TELD with PRP injections and TELD only, respectively. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and MacNab criteria were evaluated, and perioperative complications were documented. The disc protrusion, spinal cross-sectional area (SCSA), and disc height were measured on MRI and evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at regular follow-up.

Results

All patients were followed up. Clinical improvement was noted in both groups. There were statistical differences in the VAS scores of back and leg pain and ODI between the two groups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up (P < 0.05); the improvement in the PRP group was significant. The disc protrusion and SCSA on MRI in the PRP group showed better improvement, with lower recurrence rate, than that in the control group at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). No adverse events were reported in our study following PRP injection.

Conclusion

Our study showed that TELD with PRP injection was a safe and effective treatment for patients with LDH in the medium and long-term follow-up. PRP injection was beneficial for disc remodeling after endoscopic discectomy and decreased the recurrence of LDH.

Synergistic impact of platelet rich plasma-heparin sulfate with hydroxyapatite/zirconia on the osteoblast differentiation potential of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells

3D porous hydroxyapatite (HA) has been reinforced by zirconia (ZrO₂) coating and impregnation with a combination of platelet rich plasma (PRP) as a source of growth factors (GFs) and Heparin sulfate (HS) to sustain the release of GFs. Adipose mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) were characterized by flow cytometry for CD (cluster of differentiation) 44, CD105, CD106, CD34 and CD144, along with checking the multipotency by differentiation into the adipocytes and osteoblasts. Then, they were cultured on the scaffold treated with and without osteogenic media on days 7, 14 and 21. Electron micrograph and PKH staining show that the ADMSCs have a fusiform phenotype in the absence of osteogenic induction. Cell viability assay shows a higher number of the viable cells on the PRP-containing scaffolds than PRP-free scaffolds on day 7. Colorimetric evaluation, quantitative RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry demonstrate that PRP and HS significantly elevate the alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity and also accelerate the production of both early and mid-osteogenic markers, including collagen I and osteopontin expression with and without osteogenic conditions. The PRP-HS also accelerates the expression of the late osteogenic marker, osteocalcin, in both mRNA and protein level expression with a peak on day 21. In conclusion, supplementation of HA/ZrO₂ with PRP/HS has a synergistic impact on the ADMSCs, even in the absence of chemical induction. It seems that HA/ZrO₂/PRP/HS scaffold provides a higher osteoconductive microenvironment for stem cell differentiation to osteoblasts.

Factors Affecting Incomplete L5/S Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Including Spinopelvic Sagittal Parameters

Study Design

Retrospective observational study.

Purpose

In this study we identify risk factors, including patient demographics, sagittal parameters, and clinical examinations, affecting incomplete L5/S posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Overview of Literature

The lumbosacral spine is considered to have an interbody fusion rate lower than that of the lumbar spine, but few studies have investigated the cause, including investigating the pelvis. We believe that pelvic morphology can affect L5/S interbody fusion of the lumbosacral spine.

Methods

We observed 141 patients (61 men, 80 women; average age, 65.8 years) who had undergone PLIF and checked for the presence of L5/S interbody fusion. We investigated factors such as age, gender, the presence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), fusion level, and grade 2 osteotomy, as well as pre-, post-, and post-preoperative L5/S disk height and angle, lumbar lordosis, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and pelvic incidence (PI), comparing those with and without L5/S interbody fusion. In addition, we analyzed the patients classified into short-level (n=111) and multi-level fusion groups (n=30).

Results

Overall, the L5/S interbody fusion rate was 70% (short-level, 78%; multi-level, 40%). Age and pre- and post-preoperative L5/S disk angle were significantly different in each fusion level group. DISH presence, grade 2 osteotomy, and postoperative VAS and JOA scores were significantly different in the short-level fusion group, whereas PI was significantly different in the multi-level fusion group.

Conclusions

Incomplete union after L5/S PLIF correlates with advanced age, many fusion levels, and a large value of preoperative and a small value of post-preoperative L5/S disk angles.

Understanding the Future Prospects of Synergizing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery with Ceramics and Regenerative Cellular Therapies

Transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) is the last resort to address the lumber degenerative disorders such as spondylolisthesis, causing lower back pain. The current surgical intervention for these abnormalities includes open TLIF. However, in recent years, minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has gained a high momentum, as it could minimize the risk of infection, blood loss, and post-operative complications pertaining to fusion surgery. Further advancement in visualizing and guiding techniques along with grafting cage and materials are continuously improving the safety and efficacy of MIS-TLIF. These assistive techniques are also playing a crucial role to increase and improve the learning curve of surgeons. However, achieving an appropriate output through TLIF still remains a challenge, which might be synergized through 3D-printing and tissue engineering-based regenerative therapy. Owing to their differentiation potential, biomaterials such as stem/progenitor cells may contribute to restructuring lost or damaged tissues during MIS-TLIF, and this therapeutic efficacy could be further supplemented by platelet-derived biomaterials, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Thus, based on the above-mentioned strategies, we have comprehensively summarized recent developments in MIS-TLIF and its possible combinatorial regenerative therapies for rapid and long-term relief.

The Effect of Megakaryocytes and Platelets Derived from Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells on Bone Formation

Introduction

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is drawing attention as a substance that can promote bone formation. The growth factors present in PRP are stable for a long time after freeze-drying. However, the effects of PRP are inconsistent, and its effects on bone union in spinal surgery remain controversial. The immortalized megakaryocyte cell lines (imMKCLs) derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have been developed to produce numerous stable and clinically functional platelets. In this study, growth factors present in freeze-dried hiPSC-derived imMKCLs and platelets (iPS-MK/Plts) were evaluated, and their ability to promote bone formation was examined using a rat lumbar artificial bone grafting model.

Methods

We prepared freeze-dried iPS-MK/Plts and quantified their growth factors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Surgical grafting of artificial bone to the lumbar transverse processes was performed in 8-week-old female rats, which were divided into two groups: artificial bone graft (control) and artificial bone graft plus freeze-dried iPS-MK/Plts (iPS group). Transplantation was performed only on the left side. Eight weeks after the surgery, we captured computed tomography images and compared bilateral differences in the bone volume of the graft site in each rat. We also compared the left side/right side bone volume ratio between the two groups.

Results

The freeze-dried iPS-MK/Plts contained numerous growth factors. While there was no significant increase in bone volume on the transplanted side than that on the non-grafted side in the control group, bone volume significantly increased on the transplanted side in the iPS group, as evidenced by augmented mean left/right bone volume ratio of the iPS group compared with that of the control group. But the new bone observed in the iPS group was histologically normal.

Conclusions

Freeze-dried hiPSC-derived MKCLs and platelets contain several stable growth factors and have the potential for promoting new bone formation.

Platelet Rich Plasma in Orthopedic Surgical Medicine

There is a global interest in optimizing post-surgical tissue repair strategies, leading to better patient outcomes and fewer complications, most ideally with reduced overall cost. In this regard, in recent years, the interest in autologous biological treatments in orthopedic surgery and sports medicine has increased greatly, and the addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to the surgical armamentarium is of particular note. Unfortunately, the number of PRP preparation devices has also grown immensely over the recent decades, raising meaningful concern for the considerable variation in the qualities of currently available PRP preparations. The lack of consensus on the standardization of PRP preparation and of agreement on condition specific PRP formulations is largely responsible for the sometimes contradictory outcomes in the literature. Furthermore, the full potential of PRP technology, the concept of individualized treatment protocols based on bioformulation options, and platelet dosing, angiogenesis, and antimicrobial and painkilling effects of PRP relevant to orthopedic surgery have rarely been addressed. In this review, we will discuss recent developments regarding PRP preparations and potential therapeutic effects. Additionally, we present a synopsis of several published data regarding PRP applications in orthopedic surgery for treating tendon injuries, inducing bone repair, strengthening spinal fusion outcomes, and supporting major joint replacements.

The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the fusion rate and clinical outcome of spinal fusion surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used in many orthopedic surgeries and spinal disease treatments; however, the effect of PRP on spinal fusion remains controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To assess the fusion rate and clinical results of PRP compared with non-PRP administration in the treatment of spinal fusion with regard to decreasing pain and improving healing and function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Studies comparing PRP to non-PRP treatment with respect to the fusion rate and clinical outcome in patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery were included.

RESULT

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 7 prospective cohort studies were identified. The spinal fusion rate was not significantly different between the groups in all RCTs or cohort studies at the final follow-up. In comparison, PRP significantly reduced pain after surgery as evaluated in the RCT analysis and the complication rate did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

According to the available studies, PRP does not contribute to the union rate, relieve pain or increase the complication rate in spinal fusion surgery. As clinical heterogeneity exists in these studies, further large, well-designed RCTs that focus on the standard assessment of PRP are needed.

Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Spinal Fusion Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used very successfully in enhancing bone fusion in animal experiments. Also, the efficaciousness of PRP in other specialties of medicine such as dentistry, dermatology ophthalmology, and sports medicine is well documented. But the use of PRP to augment bone fusion after spinal surgery in humans is still controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the role of PRP in enhancing spinal fusion by fastening the rate of new bone formation and decreasing pain after spinal surgery in humans.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library studies that compared PRP versus control in enhancing spinal fusion after deformity correction.

Results

Five retrospective studies with 253 participants and nine prospective cohort studies with 460 participants were identified. The bone fusion rate was excellent for studies that used a high platelet concentration in PRP relative to control (odds ratio (OR) = 4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.13, 8.83), and P < 0.05) while bone fusion was poor to studies that used a low concentrate of platelet in PRP relative to control. The rate of new bone formation was high in the PRP group compared to the control group with the mean difference in Hounsfield unit (HU) 144.91 (95% CI (80.63, 209.18), P < 0.05). Time to bone fusion was short in the PRP group during the first six months of surgery relative to the control group with a mean difference of −2.03 (95% CI (−2.35, −1.7); P < 0.05). No difference was found in pain reduction by visual analog score (VAS) between the PRP group and control.

Conclusion

PRP facilitates new bone formation and bone fusion with a minimum concentration of the growth factor 5 times that of the peripheral blood. PRP stimulatory effects are not continuous and are very effective within six months of implantation.

Efficacy of Using Platelet-Rich Plasma in Spinal Fusion Surgery-A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Compliant Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been frequently used to enhance bone regeneration. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the fusion rate and pain relief of applying PRP during spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

Studies investigating spinal fusion surgery combined with PRP were retrieved from Medline and the Web of Science in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A quality evaluation was conducted using the Cochrane collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment for cohort trials. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, version 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies, with 661 patients, were included in the present meta-analysis. The mean age was 52.3 ± 8.0 years. Overall, the pooled results demonstrated that the differences in the fusion rates between the PRP and non-PRP treatment groups were not statistically significant. The risk ratio was 1.01 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.06; P = 0.83). Also, no significant difference in pain relief measured using the visual analog scale was found between the 2 groups. The mean difference was -0.08 (95% confidence interval, -0.26 to 0.11; P = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding PRP did not increase the fusion rates from spinal fusion surgery. In addition, no significant difference was found in pain relief between the PRP and non-PRP treatment groups.

Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treating Low Back Pain: A Review of the Current Literature

Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem encountered by physicians. It is a considerable cause of morbidity and socioeconomic loss and is one of the most expensive musculoskeletal disorders. Conventional treatments include bed rest, analgesics, therapeutic exercises, lumbar or caudal epidural corticosteroids, and surgery. Several new biological therapies are being investigated for use in LBP and one of these is platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In this article, we summarize the current literature published on PRP concerning its composition, classification, and application in LBP. We believe our review will prove useful to clinicians and academics alike, interested in new developing therapies for LBP.

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to compare outcomes (pain VAS, fusion and adverse event) of PRP and placebo after posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies were identified from Medline and Scopus from inception to September 16, 2019 that reported visual analog scale back pain, postoperative complications and fusions of either group.

RESULTS

In a total of seven studies, two, two, three studies were RCT, prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Overall, there were 270 patients (150 in the PRP group and 149 in the placebo group). Three, three, four, three, two, seven and four studies were reported for pain VAS back in 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, period of fusion, postoperative fusion and adverse events, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference (UMD) VAS back in 3, 6, 6 and 24 months was - 0.41 (95% CI - 0.87, 0.05) score, - 0.97 (95% CI - 1.68, - 0.27) score, - 0.33 (95% CI - 0.61, - 0.59) score, - 0.19 (95% CI - 1.00, 0.62) scores lower than placebo after posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) patients. The UMD period of bone union were - 1.62 (95% CI - 1.85, - 1.39) months faster than placebo after PLF patients. A total of seven and four studies were reported fusion and adverse events between PRP and placebo group. No significant differences were noted for fusion and adverse events with the pooled RR of 1.03 (95% CI 0.48, 1.80) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.14, 6.56).

CONCLUSIONS

PRP with autologous bone graft had lower back pain and faster bone union time than bone graft alone. While, there have no difference in fusion rate and adverse events in both groups. Larger, prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings as the current literature is still insufficient. Further research including cost of operation, postoperative function and satisfaction, quality of life and cost-efficacy analysis is required to determine whether the PRP with autologous bone graft is superior to bone graft alone or not.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Freeze-Dried Platelet-Rich Plasma Induces Osteoblast Proliferation via Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro pharmacological activity of growth factors (GFs) in freeze-dried platelet-rich plasma (FD-PRP) after storage for 4 weeks.

Overview of Literature

Freshly prepared PRP is a rich source of many GFs. We reported that FD-PRP stored for 8 weeks accelerated bone union in a rat posterolateral fusion model equally well as fresh-PRP. However, the pharmacological activity of FD-PRP after long-term storage has not been shown in vitro.

Methods

Immediately after preparation, as well as 4 weeks after freeze-dried storage, the platelet count was measured. Human osteoblasts were treated with fresh-PRP and FD-PRP, respectively. Western blotting was used to assess the phosphorylation of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor (PDGFR) and its downstream target, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). The proliferation rates of osteoblasts were investigated by immunocytochemistry and MTT cell viability assays. Furthermore, we used western blotting to evaluate the effect of PDGFR knockdown on the phosphorylation of ERK stimulated with fresh-PRP and FD-PRP.

Results

Platelet counts in both the fresh-PRP and FD-PRP samples were approximately 10-fold higher than in peripheral blood samples. The phosphorylation and activation of the PDGFR and ERK were evenly induced by fresh-PRP and FD-PRP stimulation. Both freshPRP and FD-PRP significantly induced osteoblast proliferation in MTT cell viability assays. Furthermore, osteoblast PDGFR knockdown attenuated the downstream ERK activation by fresh PRP and FD-PRP.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the pharmacological activity of PDGF in FD-PRP in vitro after 4 weeks of storage.

Platelet-rich plasma for the spinal fusion

There has been a wide interest in using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a therapeutic agent to enhance spinal fusion. There are two review articles based only on clinical studies regarding the effect of PRP on spinal fusion. However, with regard to both animal model studies and clinical studies, there is no review studies regarding its effect on spinal fusion and no review studies focusing on the platelet count and the concentration of the growth factor in the PRP. The purpose is to review the literatures about the effect of PRP on spinal fusion according to the animal model studies and clinical studies, focusing on the effect of the platelet count and the concentration of the growth factor in the PRP. A PubMed search was performed for English-language articles. We identified 20 articles regarding the effect of PRP on fusion in animal model studies and clinical studies, of which 16 articles met the study criteria of case-control studies or prospective randomized studies for the spinal fusion. The articles were categorized into small-sized animal model, middle-sized animal model, and clinical studies. Studies have shown both beneficial and inhibitory effects. The conclusion that PRP has the stimulating effect on spinal fusion was not reached. However, PRP might promote the human spinal fusion if the platelet count or the concentration of growth factors in the PRP increases.

Synergistic Effect of NELL-1 and an Ultra-Low Dose of BMP-2 on Spinal Fusion

Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) is widely used in spinal fusion but it can cause adverse effects such as ectopic bone and adipose tissue in vivo. Neural epidermal growth factor like-like molecule-1 (NELL-1) has been shown to suppress BMP-2-induced adverse effects. However, no optimum carriers that control both NELL-1 and BMP-2 releases to elicit long-term bioactivity have been developed. In this study, we employed polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) as a control release carrier for NELL-1 and BMP-2. An ultra-low dose of BMP-2 synergistically functioned with NELL-1 on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation with greater mineralization in vitro. The osteoinductive ability of NELL-1 and an ultra-low dose of BMP-2 in PEC was investigated in rat posterolateral spinal fusion. Our results showed increased fusion rate, bone architecture, and improved bone stiffness at 8 weeks after surgery in the combination groups compared with NELL-1 or BMP-2 alone. Moreover, the formation of ectopic bone and adipose tissue was negligible in all the PEC groups. In summary, dual delivery of NELL-1 and an ultra-low dose of BMP-2 in the PEC control release carrier has greater fusion efficiency compared with BMP-2 alone and could potentially be a better alternative to the currently used BMP-2 treatments for spinal fusion. Impact Statement In this study, polyelectrolyte complex was used to absorb neural epidermal growth factor like-like molecule-1 (NELL-1) and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) to achieve controlled dual release. The addition of NELL-1 significantly reduced the effective dose of BMP-2 to 2.5% of its conventional dose in absorbable collagen sponge, to produce solid spinal fusion without significant adverse effects. This study was the first to identify the efficacy of combination NELL-1 and BMP-2 in a control release carrier in spinal fusion, which could be potentially used clinically to increase fusion rate and avoid the adverse effects commonly associated with conventional BMP-2.

An evaluation of biomaterials and osteobiologics for arthrodesis achievement in spine surgery

An increasing variety of orthobiologic materials, including autologous and allogeneic bone graft, bone marrow aspirate, demineralized bone matrix, ceramics, and growth factors are available to the spine surgeon. Although autologous bone graft remains the gold standard material, concerns for failure in achieving fusion have prompted evaluation of current and new biologic materials. As such, this review attempts to summarize the available biologic materials with their pertinent characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and primary uses.

Platelet-rich plasma enhances bone union in posterolateral lumbar fusion: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) accelerates bone union in vivo in a rodent model of spinal fusion surgery. However, PRP's effect on bone union after spinal surgery remains unclear.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PRP after posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample included a total 62 patients (31 patients in the PRP group or 31 patients in the control group).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures included the bone fusion rate, the area of bone fusion mass, the duration of bone fusion, and the clinical score using the visual analog scale (VAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We randomized 62 patients who underwent one- or two-level instrumented PLF for lumbar degenerative spondylosis with instability to either the PRP (31 patients) or the control (31 patients) groups. Platelet-rich plasma-treated patients underwent surgery using an autograft bone chip (local bone), and PRP was prepared from patient blood samples immediately before surgery; patients from the control group underwent PLF without PRP treatment. We assessed platelet counts and growth factor concentrations in PRP prepared immediately before surgery. The duration of bone union, the postoperative bone fusion rate, and the area of fusion mass were assessed using plain radiography every 3 months after surgery and by computed tomography at 12 or 24 months. The duration of bone fusion and the clinical scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness before and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery were evaluated using VAS.

RESULTS

Data from 50 patients with complete data were included. The bone union rate at the final follow-up was significantly higher in the PRP group (94%) than in the control group (74%) (p=.002). The area of fusion mass was significantly higher in the PRP group (572 mm²) than in the control group (367 mm²) (p=.02). The mean period necessary for union was 7.8 months in the PRP group and 9.8 months in the control group (p=.013). In the PRP, the platelet count was 7.7 times higher and the growth factor concentrations were 50 times higher than those found in plasma (p<.05). There was no significant difference in low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness in either group at any time evaluated (p>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with PRP showed a higher fusion rate, greater fusion mass, and more rapid bone union after spinal fusion surgery than patients not treated with PRP.

Evaluation of the Possible Synergic Regenerative Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hydroxyapatite/Zirconia in the Rabbit Mandible Defect Model

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bioceramics such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and zirconium oxide (ZrO₂) are used to reconstruct mandibular defects. We sought to determine the synergistic effects of HA/ZrO₂ and PRP and compare their osteogenic activity.

METHODS

ZrO₂ scaffolds were constructed by the slurry method and were then coated with HA and impregnated by PRP/heparan sulfate (HS). Bilateral mandibular defects were created in 26 male rabbits. In 20 rabbits, the left defects were treated with HA/ZrO₂/PRP (Group 1) and the corresponding right defects were filled with HA/ZrO₂ (Group 2). The 6 remaining models were treated with PRP gels at both sides (Group 3). The osteoconductivity of HA/ZrO₂/PRP was compared with that of HA/ZrO₂ or PRP by radiological and histological methods after the follow-up period, at weeks 2, 6 and 8. The statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA and LSD using SPSS, version 16.0, for Windows (P<0.05).

RESULTS

After 2 weeks, the percentage of the surface occupied by bone was significantly higher in the HA/ZrO₂/PRP-treated defects than in the PRP-treated defects (P=0.007). Osteoblast and osteocyte counts were higher significantly in the PRP-treated group (P=0.032); however, the cells had not started matrix formation on a large scale and just small islands of osteoid with trapped osteocytes were observed. In the long term, the regenerative potential of all the scaffolds was the same.

CONCLUSION

HA/ZrO₂ showed a superior osteoconductive capacity over PRP in the short term; however, they showed no long-term synergic effects.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Fusion in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Purpose

To examine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for bone fusion in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using local bone grafting.

Overview of Literature

Several authors have reported the efficacy of PRP for bone union in animal models. However, the use of PRP for bone fusion in TLIF surgery has not been fully explored.

Methods

Twenty patients underwent single-level TLIF surgery because of L4 spondylolisthesis. An interbody fusion cage and local bone were used in nine patients (control group) and an interbody fusion cage, local bone, and PRP were used in 11 patients (PRP group). PRP was prepared from the patients' blood samples (400 mL) immediately before surgery. The duration of bone union and postoperative bone fusion rate were assessed using plain radiography at every 3 months postoperatively and computed tomography at 12 or 24 months postoperatively, respectively. Lower back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness were evaluated using the visual analog scale preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

The platelet count was 8.7 times higher in PRP than in blood. The bone union rate was significantly superior in the PRP group than in the control group (91% and 77%, respectively; p=0.035), whereas the average duration of bone union was not significantly different between the groups (7.7±0.74 and 10.0±2.00 months, respectively; p=0.131). There was no significant difference in lower back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness in both groups during follow-up (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the use of PRP in TLIF surgery increases bone fusion rate.

Efficacy of platelets in bone healing: A systematic review on animal studies

In presence of large bone defects, delayed bone union, non-union, fractures, and implant surgery, bone reconstruction may be necessary. Different strategies have been employed to enhance bone healing among which the use of autologous platelet concentrates. Due to the high content of platelets and platelet-derived bioactive molecules (e.g., growth factors, antimicrobial peptides), they are promising candidates to increase bone healing. However, a high heterogeneity of both preclinical and clinical studies resulted in contrasting results. Aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of platelet concentrates in animal models of bone regeneration, considering the possible factors which might affect the outcome. An electronic search was performed on MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. Animal studies with a minimum follow up of 2 weeks and a sample size of five subjects per group, using platelet concentrates for bone regeneration, were included. Articles underwent risk of bias assessment and further quality evaluation was done. Sixty studies performed on six animal species (rat, rabbit, dog, sheep, goat, and mini-pig) were included. The present part of the review considers only studies performed on rats and rabbits (35 articles). The majority of the studies were considered at medium risk of bias. Animal species, healthy models, platelet, growth factors and leukocytes concentration, and type of bone defect seemed to influence the efficacy of platelet concentrates in bone healing. However, final conclusions were not be drawn, since only few included studies evaluated leukocyte, growth factor content, or presence of other bioactive molecules in platelet concentrates. Further studies with a standardized protocol including characterization of the final products will provide useful information for clinical application of platelet concentrates in bone surgery.

Freeze-Dried Human Platelet-Rich Plasma Retains Activation and Growth Factor Expression after an Eight-Week Preservation Period

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) stored at room temperature (RT), frozen, or after freeze-drying.

Overview of Literature

PRP enriches tissue repair and regeneration, and is a novel treatment option for musculoskeletal pathologies. However, whether biological activity is preserved during PRP storage remains uncertain.

Methods

PRP was prepared from blood of 12 healthy human volunteers (200 mL/person) and stored using three methods: PRP was stored at RT with shaking, PRP was frozen and stored at −80℃, or PRP was freeze-dried and stored at RT. Platelet counts and growth factor content were examined immediately after preparation, as well as 2, 4, and 8 weeks after storage. Platelet activation rate was quantified by flow cytometry.

Results

Platelet counts were impossible to determine in many RT samples after 2 weeks, but they remained at constant levels in frozen and freeze-dried samples, even after 8 weeks of storage. Flow cytometry showed approximately 80% activation of the platelets regardless of storage conditions. Almost no growth factors were detected in the RT samples after 8 weeks, while low but significant expression was detected in the frozen and freeze-dried PRP. Over time, the mean relative concentrations of various growth factors decreased significantly or disappeared in the RT group. In the frozen group, levels were maintained for 4 weeks, but decreased significantly by 8 weeks (p <0.05). The freeze-dried group maintained baseline levels of growth factors for the entire 8-week duration.

Conclusions

Freeze-drying enables PRP storage while maintaining bioactivity and efficacy for extended periods.

Freeze-Dried Platelet-Rich Plasma Accelerates Bone Union with Adequate Rigidity in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Surgery Model in Rats

Fresh platelet-rich plasma (PRP) accelerates bone union in rat model. However, fresh PRP has a short half-life. We suggested freeze-dried PRP (FD-PRP) prepared in advance and investigated its efficacy in vivo. Spinal posterolateral fusion was performed on 8-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats divided into six groups based on the graft materials (n = 10 per group): sham control, artificial bone (A hydroxyapatite-collagen composite) -alone, autologous bone, artificial bone + fresh-PRP, artificial bone + FD-PRP preserved 8 weeks, and artificial bone + human recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP) as a positive control. At 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery, we investigated their bone union-related characteristics including amount of bone formation, histological characteristics of trabecular bone at remodeling site, and biomechanical strength on 3-point bending. Comparable radiological bone union was confirmed at 4 weeks after surgery in 80% of the FD-PRP groups, which was earlier than in other groups (p < 0.05). Histologically, the trabecular bone had thinner and more branches in the FD-PRP. Moreover, the biomechanical strength was comparable to that of autologous bone. FD-PRP accelerated bone union at a rate comparable to that of fresh PRP and BMP by remodeling the bone with thinner, more tangled, and rigid trabecular bone.

Variables Affecting Fusion Rates in the Rat Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Model with Autogenic/Allogenic Bone Grafts: A Meta-analysis

The rat posterolateral spinal fusion model with autogenic/allogenic bone graft (rat PFABG) has been increasingly utilized as an experimental model to assess the efficacy of novel fusion treatments. The objective of this study was to investigate the reliability of the rat PFABG model and examine the effects of different variables on spinal fusion. A web-based literature search from January, 1970 to September, 2015, yielded 26 studies, which included 40 rat PFABG control groups and 449 rats. Data regarding age, weight, sex, and strain of rats, graft volume, graft type, decorticated levels, surgical approach, institution, the number of control rats, fusion rate, methods of fusion assessment, and timing of fusion assessment were collected and analyzed. The primary outcome variable of interest was fusion rate, as evaluated by manual palpation. Fusion rates varied widely, from 0 to 96%. The calculated overall fusion rate was 46.1% with an I ² value of 62.4, which indicated moderate heterogeneity. Weight >300 g, age >14 weeks, male rat, Sprague-Dawley strain, and autogenic coccyx grafts increased fusion rates with statistical significance. Additionally, an assessment time-point ≥8 weeks had a trend towards statistical significance (p = 0.070). Multi-regression analysis demonstrated that timing of assessment and age as continuous variables, as well as sex as a categorical variable, can predict the fusion rate with R ² = 0.82. In an inter-institution reliability analysis, the pooled overall fusion rate was 50.0% [44.8, 55.3%], with statistically significant differences among fusion outcomes at different institutions (p < 0.001 and I ² of 72.2). Due to the heterogeneity of fusion outcomes, the reliability of the rat PFABG model was relatively limited. However, selection of adequate variables can optimize its use as a control group in studies evaluating the efficacy of novel fusion therapies.

Hydroxyapatite-Based Biomaterials Versus Autologous Bone Graft in Spinal Fusion: An In Vivo Animal Study

STUDY DESIGN

An in vivo study was designed to compare the efficacy of biomimetic magnesium-hydroxyapatite (MgHA) and of human demineralized bone matrix (HDBM), both dispersed in a mixture of biomimetic MgHA nanoparticles, with that of an autologous bone graft.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate 2 new bone substitutes as alternatives to a bone autograft for spinal fusion, determining their osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, and their capacity of remodeling, using a large animal model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal fusion is a common surgical procedure and it is performed for different conditions. A successful fusion requires potentially osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive biomaterials.

METHODS

A posterolateral spinal fusion model involved 18 sheep, bilaterally implanting test materials between the vertebral transverse processes. The animals were divided into 2 groups: 1 fusion level was treated with MgHA (group 1) or with HDBM-MgHA (group 2). The other fusion level received bone autografts in both groups.

RESULTS

Radiographical, histological, and microtomographic results indicated good osteointegration between the spinous process and the vertebral foramen for both materials. Histomorphometry revealed no significant differences between MgHA and autologous bone for all the parameters examined, whereas significantly lower values of bone volume were observed between HDBM-MgHA and autologous bone. Moreover, the normalization of the histomorphometric data with autologous bone revealed that MgHA showed a significantly higher value of bone volume and a lower value of trabecular number, more similar to autologous bone than HDBM-MgHA.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that the use of MgHA in an ovine model of spinal fusion led to the deposition of new bone tissue without qualitative and quantitative differences with respect to new bone formed with autologous bone, whereas the HDBM-MgHA led to a reduced deposition of newly formed bone tissue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Research progress in the mechanism of effect of PRP in bone deficiency healing

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy is a recently developed technique that uses a concentrated portion of autologous blood to try to improve and accelerate the healing of various tissues. There is a considerable interest in using these PRP products for the treatment used in bone deficiency healing. Because PRP products are safe and easy to prepare and administer, there has been increased attention toward using PRP in numerous clinical settings. The benefits of PRP therapy appear to be promising, and many investigators are exploring the ways in which this therapy can be used in the clinical setting. At present, the molecular mechanisms of bone defect repair studies have focused on three aspects of the inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and angiogenic factors. The role of PRP works mainly through these three aspects of bone repair. The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence on the mechanism of the effect of PRP in bone deficiency healing.