In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness

Biomechanical analysis of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization using a pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilizer or an interspinous process spacer

This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of two widely used nonfusion posterior dynamic stabilization (NPDS) devices, pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilizer (PSDS) and interspinous process spacer (IPS), on biomechanics of the implanted lumbar spine under static and vibration loadings. The finite element model of healthy human lumbosacral segment was modified to incorporate NPDS device insertion at L4-L5 segment. Bioflex and DIAM were used as PSDS-based and IPS-based NPDS devices, respectively. As a comparison, lumbar interbody fusion with rigid stabilization was also simulated at L4-L5. For static loading, segmental range of motion (ROM) of the models under moments of four physiological motions was computed using hybrid testing protocol. For vibration loading, resonant modes and dynamic stress of the models under vertical excitation were extracted through random response analysis. The results showed that compared with the rigid fusion model, ROM of the nonfusion models was higher at L4-L5 level but lower at adjacent levels (L1- L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L5-S1). Compared with the Bioflex model, the DIAM model produced higher ROM at L4-L5 level but lower ROM at adjacent levels, especially under lateral bending and axial rotation; resonant frequency of the DIAM model was slightly lower; dynamic response of nucleus stress at L4-L5 level was slightly higher for the DIAM model, and the dynamic stress at adjacent levels was no obvious difference between the nonfusion models. This study reveals biomechanical differences between the Bioflex and DIAM systems, which may provide references for selecting surgical approaches in clinical practice.

Ex vivo study of the intradiskal pressure in the C6-7 intervertebral disk after experimental destabilization and distraction-fusion of the C5-C6 vertebrae in canine cadaveric specimens

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intradiskal pressure (IDP) in the C6-7 intervertebral disk (IVD) after destabilization and distraction-fusion of the C5-C6 vertebrae.

SAMPLE

7 cadaveric C4-T1 vertebral specimens with no evidence of IVD disease from large-breed dogs.

PROCEDURES

Specimens were mounted in a custom-made 6 degrees of freedom spinal loading simulator so the C5-C6 and C6-C7 segments remained mobile. One specimen remained untreated and was used to assess the repeatability of the IDP measurement protocol. Six specimens underwent 3 sequential configurations (untreated, partial diskectomy of the C5-6 IVD, and distraction-fusion of the C5-C6 vertebrae). Each construct was biomechanically tested under neutral, flexion, extension, and right-lateral bending loads. The IDP was measured with a pressure transducer inserted into the C6-7 IVD and compared between the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus and across all 3 constructs and 4 loads.

RESULTS

Compared with untreated constructs, partial diskectomy and distraction-fusion of C5-C6 decreased the mean ± SD IDP in the C6-7 IVD by 1.3 ± 1.3% and 0.8 ± 1.3%, respectively. During motion, the IDP remained fairly constant in the annulus fibrosus and increased by 3.8 ± 3.0% in the nucleus pulposus. The increase in IDP within the nucleus pulposus was numerically greatest during flexion but did not differ significantly among loading conditions.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Distraction-fusion of C5-C6 did not significantly alter the IDP of healthy C6-7 IVDs. Effects of vertebral distraction-fusion on the IDP of adjacent IVDs with degenerative changes, such as those in dogs with caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy, warrant investigation.

Ex vivo Evaluation of the Dynamic Morphometry of the Caudal Cervical Intervertebral Disc Spaces of Small Dogs and Cats

The objective of this study was to provide a morphometric description of the caudal cervical intervertebral disc (IVD) spaces of small-breed dogs and cats. Specimens consisting of C4 through C7 from five small-breed dogs and six cats were positioned in neutral, flexion, extension, and lateral bending positions; and CT images were acquired. Height and width of the cranial and caudal vertebral endplates (VEPs), angle between the VEPs (IVD wedge angle), and craniocaudal distance (IVD width) between VEPs for the four loading positions were measured and compared for three segments (C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7). VEP size normalized to body weight from medium-sized dogs was retrieved from a previous study and compared with data from small dogs and cats. A linear mixed model was used to compare outcome measures. Significance was set to p < 0.05. VEP size normalized to body weight was the largest in small dogs compared with cats (p = 0.0422) and medium-sized dogs (p = 0.0064). Cats and medium-sized dogs were similar (p = 0.2763) in this regard. Flexion and extension induced a reduction of IVD width in the ventral portion of the IVD and the area of the nucleus. The dorsal part of the IVD remained unchanged throughout loading conditions. Unique morphometric characteristics of the caudal cervical IVD space of small dogs and cats were detected that are different from those described in sizes of dogs (medium-sized) typically affected by caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy (CSM). These findings may help to understand the different pathomechanisms in cervical spinal disease between small- and medium-sized dogs, including caudal CSM.

Evaluation of Spinous Process Tethering at the Proximal End of Rigid Constructs: In Vitro Range of Motion and Intradiscal Pressure at Instrumented and Adjacent Levels

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity surgery requires use of long thoracolumbar instrumentation, which is associated with risk of postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Tethering has been used in spinal surgery but not around the spinous process (SP) in the context of preventing PJK.

METHODS

Researchers applied a nondestructive hybrid loading protocol to 7 T8-L2 cadaveric specimens in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (AR). A rigid construct (pedicle screws and rods) and 1- and 2-level SP constructs were tested, as was a hand-tie technique. SP tethering (SPT) constructs use clamps on both sides of the SP; SPT helix constructs use 1 clamp and wrap around the SP.

RESULTS

All tether constructs showed greater motion at the instrumented level and less motion at adjacent levels compared to rigid constructs. In AR, 1- and 2-level SPT constructs restricted first instrumented level motion to a greater extent when compared with other tether constructs (P ≤ .05). Passing the band through the T10 SP did not produce significant biomechanical differences compared to passing it through the T9-T10 interspinous ligament (P > .05). Hand-tied constructs demonstrated more motion compared to tensioned constructs (P > .05). Intradiscal pressure results corroborated motion data.

CONCLUSIONS

SPT at the proximal end of a rigid construct produced more favorable biomechanical outcomes at instrumented and adjacent levels than were seen with a completely rigid construct. Clinical research is needed to determine whether these methods reduce the risk of PJK among patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This work sheds light on the biomechanical stability of proximal tethering constructs in an effort to enhance the surgeon's ability to reduce rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery.

The effect of non-fusion dynamic stabilization on biomechanical responses of the implanted lumbar spine during whole-body vibration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Non-fusion dynamic stabilization surgery is increasingly popular for treating degenerative lumbar disc disease. However, changes in spine biomechanics after application of posterior dynamic fixation devices during whole-body vibration (WBV) remain unclear. The study aimed to examine the effects of non-fusion dynamic stabilization on biomechanical responses of the implanted lumbar spine to vertical WBV.

METHODS

By modifying L4-L5 segment of the healthy human L1-sacrum finite element model, single-level disc degeneration, dynamic fixation using the BioFlex system and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with rigid fixation were simulated, respectively. Dynamic responses of stress and strain in the spinal levels for the healthy, degenerated, BioFlex and ALIF models under an axial cyclic loading were investigated and compared.

RESULTS

The results showed that endplate stress at implant level was lower in the BioFlex model than in the degenerated and ALIF models, but stress of the connecting rod in the BioFlex system was greater than that in the rigid fixation system used in the ALIF. Compared with the healthy model, stress and strain responses in terms of disc bulge, annulus stress and nucleus pressure at adjacent levels were decreased in the degenerated, BioFlex and ALIF models, but no obvious difference was observed in these responses among the three models.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may be helpful to understand variations in vibration characteristics of the lumbar spine after application of non-fusion dynamic stabilization system.

An initial biomechanical investigation of fusionless anterior tether constructs for controlled scoliosis correction

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is often unsuccessful and requires surgical intervention. Theoretically, anterior fusionless surgery can achieve correction as the patient grows to skeletal maturity.

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study was to determine differences in range of motion (ROM) between multiple anterior tether constructs and tensioning techniques. Coronal plane Cobb angles were evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a cadaveric biomechanical study.

METHODS

Cadaveric spines underwent biomechanical testing to investigate two factors relevant to anterior tether reconstruction: (1) effect of fixation at the T4, superior, and T12, inferior, levels (S-I), as opposed to fixation at all T4-T12 continuous levels (Cont.); and (2) tensioning of the tether sequentially (SEQ T) or only at terminal points (T). Reconstructions were conducted at Cont., and ROM and coronal plane Cobb angles were measured. Rigid rods (R) were used as control for the tether. Funding for the present study was provided by Globus Medical, Inc., and three of five authors are employees of Globus Medical, Inc.

RESULTS

Normalized lateral bending ROM for intact was 100(±33)%. The S-I R construct reduced motion to 39(±8)%. Tethering at terminal points resulted in ROM for S-I T and S-I No T of 61(±21)% and 70(±17)%, respectively. Screws placed at every level resulted in motion of 28(±9)% for the Cont. R construct, and a stepwise increase in motion to 44(±15)%, 47(±18)%, and 71(±19)%, respectively, for Cont. SEQ T, Cont. T, and Cont. No T. These relative trends were the same in all loading modes. Average change in overall coronal plane Cobb angle from intact was 4.6(±3.2)° and 9.9(±5.5)° for Cont. T and Cont. SEQ T constructs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tensioned tether constructs allowed greater ROM than rigid constructs, and no significant difference in ROM was noted between tensioning techniques. Sequential tensioning can produce greater correction with no biomechanical advantage.