Initial Correction Rate Can be Predictive of the Outcome of Brace Treatment in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Factors Influencing Optimal Bracing Compliance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Single-center Prospective Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors contributing to optimal bracing compliance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Poor brace compliance is a key factor affecting brace treatment success in AIS. Predictive factors influencing optimal brace compliance to achieve brace treatment success remain unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included AIS patients aged 10 to 15, with a Cobb angle of 20° to 40°. Demographics data, radiographic assessments, and patient-reported outcomes (including the SRS-22r patient questionnaire) were collected. Brace compliance was monitored using in-brace thermometers, defining optimal bracing time as >18 h/d. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of optimal bracing time from the demographic and patient-reported outcomes score before bracing.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients, 59.0% achieved optimal bracing time by six months. The achieved group indicated higher scores in the satisfaction domain before bracing (3.3±0.7 vs. 3.1±0.6; P =0.034). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the satisfaction domain before bracing was an independent factor associated with the achievement of the optimal bracing time [OR 1.97 (95% CI: 1.00-3.89), P =0.049]. The model with bracing at one-month follow-up also demonstrated the bracing at 1 month was a significant factor [OR 1.52 (95% CI: 1.30-1.79), P <0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal bracing compliance in AIS is significantly influenced by prebracing satisfaction and brace compliance at earlier time points. These findings highlight the need to address psychological factors and early compliance in AIS bracing treatment. SRS-22r can be useful to identify the need for psychological support.

The Biomechanics of Spinal Orthoses for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review of the Controlling Forces

BACKGROUND

Orthotic treatment is a well-acknowledged conservative treatment for moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The efficacy of this treatment is significantly determined by the forces applied to the bodies of patients. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimal force levels that should be applied to the patient's torso by spinal orthosis. This study aims to identify reference values for the controlling forces in AIS management.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science). Only studies written in English and covering the force/pressure measurements of spinal orthosis for the treatment of AIS were included, without publication date restrictions. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was employed for the methodological quality assessment, and force measurements were standardized to pressure in kilopascals (kPa) for comparison.

RESULTS

From the initial 10,452 records, 10 studies were admitted for the final analysis. All the included studies reported the interface pressure between the thoracic (T) pad and patient's trunk, and seven studies evaluated the pressure from the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) pad. These studies used different pressure sensors or transducers with the range from 5.6 to 82.5 kPa for the T pads, and 4.8 to 85.1 kPa for the TL/L pads. Four studies reported strap tensions of 26.8 to 60.4 N. Higher strap tension was correlated with increased interface pressure (r = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

The mean strap tension was 42.5 N, the median interface pressure of the T pads was 8.75 kPa, and the median pressure of TL/L regions was 7.11 kPa without the outliers. The findings provide a baseline value for designing adjustable straps and strategically distributing pressure in orthoses.

Curve Progression After the Termination of Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Usefulness of Combining the Proximal Femur Maturity Index (PFMI) and Risser Staging

Background The brace therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) typically ends upon the end of growth. However, determining the timing of growth cessation can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of the proximal femur maturity index (PFMI), which can be assessed simultaneously with Risser staging without requiring additional radiation exposure, in determining the appropriate timing to terminate bracing. To achieve this, we investigated the relationship between skeletal maturity at the end of bracing, post-bracing curve progression, and height growth in patients who had been successfully treated with a brace. Methods Between April 2010 and March 2021, a total of 84 female patients with AIS who started bracing at our hospital with an initial Cobb angle of 20-40 degrees were included. All patients were followed for at least one year after brace termination. Height and radiographic parameters (Risser staging, PFMI, Cobb angle) were retrospectively collected. Results At the end of the bracing period, patients were categorized into Risser stage 4 (85.7%) and 5 (14.3%). By the last follow-up, patients with Risser stage 4 experienced an average main curve progression of 1.8°, whereas those with Risser stage 5 had an average progression of -0.3° (P = 0.03). Patients with Risser stage 4 were further divided into PFMI grade 5 (59.7%) and 6 (40.3%). Significant curve progression was observed in patients with PFMI grade 5 (average: 3.0°) compared to grade 6 (average: -0.6°) (P < 0.0001). The mean height growth was 1.9 cm/year for PFMI grade 5, and 0.3 cm/year for grade 6, with significant differences between these groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions PFMI allowed further categorization within Risser stage 4: PFMI grade 5 indicated remaining growth potential and risk of postbracing curve progression, whereas grade 6 indicated growth cessation. The combined use of Risser staging and PFMI, both evaluable through the same whole-spine radiograph, may provide a more accurate prediction of growth cessation.

Global research hotspots and trends in non-surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over the past three decades: a bibliometric and visualization study

Background

In recent years, research on the non-surgical treatment of AIS has been increasingly conducted. To the best of our knowledge, this field doesn't yet have a comprehensive and structured pulse combing analysis. In order to provide inspiration and resources for subsequent researchers, we thus reviewed the literature studies on the non-surgical treatment of AIS from the previous thirty years and highlighted the hotspots and frontiers of research in this field.

Methods

Main using Citespace 6.1 software, the data from the core dataset of the WOS database pertaining to the non-surgical management of AIS from 1990 to 2022 was gathered, displayed, and analyzed.

Results

839 papers in all were included in the literature. With 215 papers, the USA came in first place. Chinese Univ Hong Kong ranked first with 32 papers. Research hotspots are adolescent idiopathic spondylitis, Schroth-based physiotherapy-specific exercise efficacy, curve development, Cobb angle, TLSO brace-based clinical efficacy, quality of life, reliability, health-related quality of life questionnaires, finite element biomechanical models, follow-up, and clinical guidelines.

Conclusion

There aren't many studies that compare the clinical effectiveness of various non-surgical treatments, and because of variations in inclusion eligibility standards and outcome measures, these studies cannot be directly compared. In addition, the inconsistency of existing growth potential and progression risk assessment systems further affects comparative studies of clinical efficacy; it is recommended to establish primary assessment indicators centered on patient treatment outcomes (including appearance, disability, pain, and quality of life), as well as standardized scoliosis progression risk assessment criteria.

Higher Baseline Serum Myokine of FSTL1 May Serve as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Successful Brace Treatment in Girls With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether myokine, which is related to exercise and muscle mass, could serve as a biomarker for predicting bracing outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several risk factors have been documented to be associated with bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, serum biomarkers have not been extensively explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Skeletally immature females with AIS, without previous histories of bracing or surgery, were included. Peripheral blood was collected at the time of the bracing prescription. Baseline serum concentrations of 8 myokines [apelin, fractalkine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, erythropoietin, osteonectin, fatty-acid-binding protein 3, follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1), and musclin] were measured by multiplex assays. Patients were followed up until weaned from bracing and then designated as a "failure" (defined as Cobb angle progression >5°) or "success." A logistic regression analysis was performed that accounted for serum myokines and skeletal maturity.

RESULTS

We included 117 patients, with 27 in the failure group. Patients in the failure group had lower initial Risser sign and lower baseline serum levels of myokines, including FSTL1 (2217.3 ± 617.0 vs . 1369.3 ± 704.9, P = 0.002), apelin [116.5 (12.0, 335.9) vs . 83.5 (10.5, 221.1), P = 0.016], fractalkine (979.6 ± 457.8 vs . 743.8 ± 456.1, P = 0.020), and musclin [211.3 (16.3, 370.3) vs . 67.8 (15.5, 325.6), P = 0.049]. Following adjusted analysis, serum FSTL1 [odds ratio = 10.460; (2.213-49.453)] was determined to be predictive of bracing effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Patients who failed AIS bracing had significantly lower mean baseline levels of FSTL1 than those who achieved success. FSTL1 may serve as a biomarker that can inform outcomes after bracing.

Association of success of brace treatment and various aspects of in-brace correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Although skeletal maturity and brace wear time contribute to the success of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the extent of initial in-brace correction for ensuring successful outcomes remains unclear. We hypothesized that the degree of initial in-brace correction correlates with brace success in patients with AIS.

METHOD

The study included 135 AIS patients with a major Cobb angle of 20°-40° treated with a thoracic lumbosacral orthosis for at least one year and followed up for skeletal maturity. The subjects were divided into two groups: the skeletally immature group (group I, n = 72), who met the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial study protocol at the start of brace treatment, and the skeletally mature group (group M, n = 63). Treatment success was defined as not needing surgical treatment and a major Cobb angle <40° at the end of brace treatment.

RESULTS

In both groups, the mean major Cobb angles before treatment, while wearing the brace, and at the end of brace treatment were 30.6°/31.7°, 22.9°/24.2°, and 38.8°/33.9° (p < 0.05), respectively, and the treatment success rate was 56.9% and 77.8%, respectively (p < 0.05). Univariate regression analysis revealed the following risk factors: Risser grade 0 in group I, major Cobb angles before treatment, initial in-brace major Cobb angle, and in-brace correction rate in both groups. Cutoff values of in-brace major Cobb angle for treatment success calculated by ROC curve in groups I and M were 24° and 29°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In-brace major scoliosis correction of <25° in patients with immature skeletal status and <30° in patients with mature skeletal structure should be aimed at to achieve significant brace treatment success.

Does in-brace correction affect coronal spinal and thoracic cage parameters in individuals with idiopathic scoliosis? A retrospective cohort study

The aim of the study is to identify the effects of in-brace correction on coronal spinal and thoracic cage parameters in individuals with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). The coronal spinal parameters [Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR), lateral trunk shift, coronal alignment, biacromial slope and pelvic asymmetry] and the thoracic cage parameters [T1- 12 height, T1-S1 height, thoracic transverse diameter, and apical vertebral body-rib ratio (AVB-R)] of 89 child and adolescent patients were measured on posterior-anterior full-spine radiographs at pre-brace and in-brace conditions using Surgimap software. The initial in-brace correction (IBC) was calculated as a percentage decrease in the Cobb angle on the in-brace radiographs. The mean IBC rate for the primary curve was 37% (range = 10-100%). In the in- brace condition, the Cobb angle (p<0.001), AVR (p<0.001) and lateral trunk shift (p<0.001) decreased significantly; no statistically significant difference was found in the biacromial slope (p=0.713) and the coronal alignment (p=0.074). The T1-12 height and the T1-S1 height increased significantly (p<0.001) whereas the thoracic transverse diameter and the AVB-R decreased significantly (p<0.001). Unlike IBC rate was below 30% as IBC rate was above 30%, the T1-12 height (p<0.001) increased and the AVB-R decreased (p<0.001). The bracing improved the lateral trunk shift, the AVB-R, the thoracic and spine heights, but decreased the thoracic transverse diameter. The thoracic cage parameters may be better when the IBC rate is above 30%.

A new scoliosis brace padding method based on trunk asymmetry for scoliosis treatment

BACKGROUND

Pressure pads are used with scoliosis braces to adjust the magnitude and location of corrective forces that mechanically support the torso to correct the spine deformity. In the conventional brace (C.B.) design approaches, the location and shape of pads are determined based on the visual assessment of the clinician. The accuracy of this approach could be improved because it is limited to the clinician's expertise. The present study aimed to develop a new brace (N.B.) padding method based on trunk asymmetry for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and compare the efficacy of the developed method with C.B. in improving the Cobb angle and body posture symmetricity.

METHODS

The trunk surface geometry was scanned using a 3-dimensional scanner. The best plane of symmetry was determined, and the original trunk was reflected in the plane of symmetry, creating the reflected trunk. The difference between the reflected and original trunks was computed and color-coded using deviation contour maps. The boundary of deformed regions, with a minimum of 6-mm deviation contour maps, was identified as the trim lines for brace pads. Eight participants were recruited and divided into conventional and new padding groups. The variation of Cobb angle and torso asymmetry parameters, including the trunk rotation and back surface rotation, as well as the brace satisfaction and trunk appearance perception of the 2 groups, were compared after 3 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Cobb angle improved equally in the N.B. and C.B. groups. However, back surface rotation improved in the N.B. group (+49.6%) and worsened in the C.B. group (-6.8%). The mean trunk rotation was improved by 30% in the N.B. and further exacerbated by -2.2% in the C.B. group. The brace satisfaction and trunk appearance perception scores were higher in the N.B. than in the C.B. group, however not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the proposed brace padding system improved the trunk appearance without negatively affecting the Cobb angle correction.

Predictors of Clinically Meaningful Results of Bracing in a Large Cohort of Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis Reaching the End of Conservative Treatment

BACKGROUND

We need good outcome predictors to maximize the treatment efficiency of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The in-brace correction has shown an important predictive effect on brace failure, while the influence of other variables is still debated. We aimed to identify new outcome predictors from a big prospective database of AIS.

METHODS

Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

AIS between 21 and 45°, Risser 0-2, brace prescription during the observation, treatment conclusion. All of the participants followed a personalized conservative approach according to the SOSORT Guidelines.

OUTCOMES

End of growth below 30°-40°-50°. The regression model included age, BMI, Cobb angle, ATR, TRACE score, real brace wear (RBW), and in-brace correction (IBC).

RESULTS

A total of 1050 patients, 84% females, ages 12.1 ± 1.1, 28.2 ± 7.9° Cobb. IBC increased by 30%, 24%, and 23% the odds of ending treatment below 30°, 40°, and 50°, respectively. The OR did not change after the covariate adjustment. Cobb angle and ATR at the start also showed a predictive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic evaluation of IBC in clinics is useful for individuating the patient response to brace treatment more accurately, even in relation to the Cobb angle and ATR degrees at the start. Further studies are needed to increase the knowledge on predictors of AIS treatment results.

Early Adherence to Prescribed Brace Wear for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Is Associated With Future Brace Wear

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess if initial adherence to prescribed brace wear for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) predicts future adherence and curve improvement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

AIS bracing can be effective if patients adhere to prescribed brace wear. Previous research has associated age, sex, and brace prescription length with future adherence. We hypothesize that a patient's initial adherence to brace wear may be associated with future adherence and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive AIS patients who met the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria for bracing from 2015 to 2019 at a single center were reviewed. Patients were stratified into groups based on their adherence during the initial one-month brace wean-in period-adherent patients were defined as wearing the brace >80% of the daily prescribed amount. Brace wear was recorded by a thermosensor and assessed during the wean-in period, six-, 12-, and 24-month postbracing appointments. Statistical testing was conducted to analyze if initial adherence was associated with future adherence, curve change, and bracing success -defined as reaching Risser stage 4 with a Cobb angle <40°.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (mean age=12.5 yr) were included, of which the majority were females (83%) with thoracic curves (70%). Thirty-two patients were considered adherent, and this cohort demonstrated improved adherence relative to the nonadherent group at the six-, 12-, and 24-month appointments ( P <0.001). Adherent patients also showed a significant reduction in their scoliosis at the 12-month appointment, unlike nonadherent patients ( P <0.001). Ninety-seven percent of adherent patients achieved bracing success compared with 71% of nonadherent ( P =0.016). Females were more likely to be adherent than males.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial adherence to prescribed AIS brace wear was associated with future adherence, bracing success, and curve improvement. Early recognition of nonadherence may offer an opportunity for supportive intervention to improve brace wear behavior.

Providence nighttime brace is as effective as fulltime Boston brace for female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective analysis of a randomized cohort

BACKGROUND

Progressive moderate scoliotic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are usually treated with a fulltime brace, e.g., the Boston brace (BB). The Providence nighttime brace (PNB), is an alternative which is designed to reach the same treatment effectiveness by nighttime wear only. Few studies compared treatment effectiveness between full and nighttime bracing with contradictory results.

METHODS

Immature female patients older than 10 years with progressive moderate AIS curves with an apex below T6 were randomized into PNB (n=62) or BB (n=49) treatment. Inclusion criteria were AIS, age ≥ 10 years, no previous treatment, main curve Cobb angle 20°-40° and skeletal immaturity. The increase of the main curve by > 5° of Cobb angle at the final follow-up was established as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included (1) the Scoliosis Research Society assessment criteria of effectiveness for brace studies, (2) progression of secondary curves, (3) in-brace correction and (4) compliance to the treatment. The patients were followed until 1 year after reaching maturity.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (n=62 and n=43 in PNB and BB group, respectively) completed the follow-up (95%). In the PNB group, 71% patients were treated successfully compared to 65% patients in the BB group (p=.67). No significant difference of the curve progression was found between the groups (3.1°±6.3° and 2.6°±8.3° in PNB and BB group, respectively; p=.73). No significant differences were found for the thoracic or thoracolumbar/lumbar subgroups. PNB showed a superior in-brace correction for all curve types. One of four secondary curves progressed > 5°. The compliance to the treatment was significantly higher in the PNB than BB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both brace regimes are equally effective in treating moderate AIS curves with apex of the main curve below T6 in immature female patients older than 10 years.

Nonoperative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using braces

This review presents the state of the art according to the current evidence on nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, focusing on bracing. The definition of braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and a short history are provided. The analysis includes biomechanics, types, existing classifications, indications for treatment, time of brace wear and weaning, adherence, three-dimensional modeling, use of ultrasound imaging for bracing, management of treatment, issue of immediate in-brace correction, and documentation of the outcomes usually assessed for brace treatment, including the quality-of-life issues. According to the current evidence, there are two randomized control trials in favor of bracing. There are insufficient data on the superiority of one brace over another, although it is possible to classify and grade braces for efficacy from nonrigid to rigid and very rigid. Nevertheless, there is consensus on patients' management on the need for teamwork focusing on adherence to treatment, acceptability, and family and patient involvement.

Evaluation of In-brace Correction in Individuals with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective and Descriptive Study

Introductions: Achieving maximum correction at the beginning of brace treatment in AIS is the only factor that can be controlled by the bracing provider if we have a better understanding of the prognostics and factors associated with achieving in-brace correction. The aim of this present study was to evaluate in-brace correction in a cohort of AIS patients who were treated by full-time bracing with plastic moulded thoraco-lumbo-sacral spinal orthosis (TLSO). Methods: This study was a retrospective descriptive study. We collected data from medical records of individuals with AIS who receiving full-time braces treatment from Orthotic Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Demographic data included age, gender, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI). Cobb angle, Risser sign, and curve type were determined using pre and post-brace standing posteroanterior (PA) radiographs. Correlation analysis was performed to investigate in-brace correction with associated factors.  Results: We included 91 patients' data and radiographic images with AIS, with seven (7.69%) boys and 84 (92.31%). The overall mean Cobb angle was 32.9 ± 8.5º, and during brace treatment, it was 22.5 ± 11.5º. There was a significant mean difference in the mean Cobb angle before and in-brace (p < 0.001). The overall mean in-brace correction in the study was 34.1 ± 22.7%. Initial Cobb angle and BMI were found to be significantly negatively associated with in-brace correction with a Pearson coefficient of -0.49 and -0.24, respectively. Conclusion: The mean of first in-brace correction TLSO was 34.1% from the initial Cobb angle. No difference in in-brace correction across curve types in our study. There was a significant Cobb angle changed before and in-brace radiograph. We found that in-brace correction was significantly associated with initial Cobb angle and BMI. Keywords: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, in-brace correction, bracing

Improvement of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Primary Correction by Brace Design Optimization

(1) Background: Primary in-brace correction has been shown to be related to conservative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treatment outcome. The purpose of the study was to evaluate TLSO brace design changes over eight years regarding primary Cobb correction and de-rotation of the (major) curve. (2) Methods: This retrospective analysis included AIS patients treated with a full-time TLSO-brace in a single Orthopedic University hospital in 2012–2014 and 2017–2019. Brace design changes resulted from an evolutionary process, from a 3-point bending to a 3D TLSO. The brace parameters (presence of an anterior shoulder pad, posterior high-thoracic pad, thoracic space, and angle of the lumbar and thoracic pressure points) were analyzed regarding the primary (major) Cobb angle and apex rotation correction with a multivariate analysis. (3) Results: A total of 74 (63 female) patients were included in the study. The Cobb angle primary correction was significantly improved over the timeframe. The primary correction was significantly influenced by all design parameters and partially by its interactions with (curve specific) different effects on the Cobb correction and apex de-rotation. (4) Conclusions: Knowledge about the effects of brace design parameters on the curve’s angle and rotation correction enables improvements in individualized brace design and the brace optimization process.

Coronal deformity angular ratio as a predictive factor for in-brace curve correction and long-term outcome of brace treatment in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) and in-brace correction (IBC) and their role in predicting the long-term bracing outcome in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, the patient's sex, age, primary curve Cobb angle (at initiation of brace treatment, best in-brace, before spinal fusion, and final follow-up), curve pattern, duration of brace treatment, brace type, and C-DAR at initiation of bracing were recorded. The C-DAR values were classified as < 5, 5 ≤ to ≤ 6, and > 6. The IBC values were classified as ≥ 50%, 40% ≤ to ≤ 49%, and < 40%. We classified the patients into two groups of success and failure according to the Cobb angle at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients (25 boys and 119 girls) were included. Bracing was successful in 60.4% of them. There was a significant association between C-DAR and bracing outcome (p < 0.0001). 63.9% of the patients with C-DAR < 5 had an IBC ≥ 50%. However, when C-DAR was 5 ≤ to ≤ 6 and > 6, 29.2% and 16.9% of the patients had an IBC of ≥ 50%, respectively. For patients with IBC ≥ 50%, the success rate of bracing was 89.2%. Results of logistic regression analysis revealed that the strongest predictor for brace treatment outcome was the C-DAR, with an odds ratio of 2.11.

CONCLUSION

C-DAR may be used as a predictive factor for the long-term outcome of brace treatment in AIS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Predictive Factors on Initial in-brace Correction in Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature and provide an overview of reported predictive factors on initial in-brace correction in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Brace therapy is the best proven non-surgical treatment for IS. There is strong evidence that lack of initial in-brace correction is associated with brace treatment failure. To improve initial in-brace corrections and subsequently long-term brace treatment success, knowledge about factors influencing initial in-brace correction is a prerequisite.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Cinahl, and Cochrane in November 2020. Studies which reported factors influencing initial in-brace correction in IS patients treated with brace therapy were considered eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of the 4562 potentially eligible articles identified, 28 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Nine studies (32%) were classified as high quality studies and the remaining 19 studies (68%) as low quality. Thirty-four different reported factors were collected from the included studies. Strong evidence was found for increased curve flexibility as favorable predictive factor for initial in-brace correction. Moderate evidence was found for thoracolumbar or lumbar curve pattern as favourable predictive factor, and double major curve pattern as unfavourable predictive factor for initial in-brace correction. Also moderate evidence was found that there is no significant difference on initial in-brace correction between computer-aided design and manufacturing systems (CAD/CAM) braces with or without finite element models (FEM) simulation, and braces fabricated using the conventional plaster-cast.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review indicate that increased curve flexibility is strongly associated with increased initial in-brace correction.Level of Evidence: 1.

In-Brace versus Out-of-Brace Protocol for Radiographic Follow-Up of Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective Study

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare two standardized protocols for radiological follow-up (in-brace versus out-of-brace radiographs) to study the rate of curve progression over time in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients after failed brace treatment. In-brace radiographs have the advantage that proper fit of the brace and in-brace correction can be evaluated. However, detection of progression might theoretically be more difficult. Fifty-one IS patients that underwent surgical treatment after failed brace treatment were included. For 25 patients, follow-up radiographs were taken in-brace. For the other 26 patients, brace treatment was temporarily stopped before out-of-brace follow-up radiographs were taken. Both groups showed significant curve progression compared to baseline after a mean follow-up period of 3.4 years. The protocol with in-brace radiographs was noninferior regarding curve progression rate over time. The estimated monthly Cobb angle progression based on the mixed-effect model was 0.5 degrees in both groups. No interaction effect was found for time, and patients’ baseline Cobb angle (p = 0.98), and for time and patients’ initial in-brace correction (p = 0.32). The results of this study indicate that with both in-brace and out-of-brace protocols for radiographic follow-up, a similar rate of curve progression can be expected over time in IS patients with failed brace treatment.

Initial In-Brace Correction: Can the Evaluation of Cobb Angle Be the Only Parameter Predictive of the Outcome of Brace Treatment in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Background: Patients with a better initial in-brace correction could show a higher probability of a successful outcome. However, no one has investigated whether parameters can affect the outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate if the initial correction rate (ICR) could be predictive of the bracing outcome and to determine the role of some mechanical and biological parameters in ICR. Methods: The study population comprised 449 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Curve correction > 10° Cobb defines brace treatment success. Success and failure groups were compared in terms of the Risser sign, initial Cobb angle, initial Perdriolle value and ICR. Results: ICR significantly correlates with initial Perdriolle. The success group had a significantly lower value of Pedriolle and initial Cobb angles, Risser sign and ICR than the failure group. The ICR and lower Risser were significantly associated with the brace treatment outcome. This seems particularly suitable for positivity prediction (Predicting value VP+: 87%). Conclusions: This study confirms that immediate in-brace correction can foretell the brace treatment outcome. Patients with a low Risser sign and a high rate of in-brace correction showed a bracing success of 87%. A correlation between rotation and in-brace correction confirms that rotation is among the parameters that influence the deformed spine reaction to corrective actions the most.

Brace treatment for patients with scoliosis: State of the art

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapy, brace applications or surgery are the treatment options utilised to manage patients with scoliosis. Many different brace applications are used, and the success rates of orthoses vary.

OBJECTIVES

Brace applications can have detrimental impacts on the patient leading to physical discomfort, psychological discomfort, and in some instance the use of braces may even be painful. Therefore, future developments in this field should be aimed at improving the success rate and reducing physical distress experienced by the patient while using brace applications. The purpose of this article is to provide recommendations with respect to the most appropriate bracing approach in general.

METHOD

A narrative review of the scientific literature was carried out to substantiate the statements made in this article.

RESULTS

The most important braces provided for the treatment of patients with scoliosis and the treatment results that can be achieved are presented and discussed, taking into account the most recent systematic reviews. A wide range of success rates have been found for the different brace applications.

CONCLUSION

Given that brace application may impact the patient leading to physical discomfort and psychological distress, good quality management in brace application for patients with scoliosis is needed to ensure the best possible outcome and the least stressful management.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Safety in brace application for patients with scoliosis needs improvement. The use of standardised and reliable computer aided design (CAD) libraries and appropriate patient information based on published guidelines is suggested.

The Effect of Brace Treatment on Large Curves of 40° to 55° in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis Who Have Avoided Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

To evaluate the effect of Milwaukee brace treatment on adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with large curves (40° to 55°) who refuse to do surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we gathered the clinical records of all adolescents with AIS with an initial curve of 40° to 55°. They had been referred to our center from December 1990 to January 2017. Although they had been advised to do surgery, they had all refused to do it. Their clinical data were recorded, such as sex, age, Risser sign, scoliosis, and kyphosis curve magnitude (at the beginning of brace treatment, weaning time, brace discontinuation, and minimum of 2 years after the treatment). Based on treatment success, the patients were divided into 2 groups: progressed and nonprogressed.

Results

Sixty patients with an average initial Cobb angle of 44.93°±4.86° were included. The curve progressed in 57%, stabilized in 25%, and improved in 18% of the patients. In the progressed group (34 patients), 31 patients had undergone surgery. There was no significant association between the age of beginning the brace treatment and the final Cobb angle of nonprogressed group (p>0.05). However, in-brace correction and initial Risser sign had a significant correlation with curve magnitude at the final follow-up (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Brace treatment seems to be effective in controlling the further curve progression in AIS with 40° and 55° curves. Our results can help physicians make sound decisions about the patients with larger curves who refuse to do surgery.

Lack of in-brace x-rays in compliant AIS patients wearing full-time TLSO braces associates with failure

Background

In-brace correction and brace compliance with thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthotic (TLSO) braces are associated with successful treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This paper compares patients who had consistent radiographic documentation of in-brace correction to those who did not.

Methods

All skeletally immature (Risser 0-2) patients were treated for AIS (25-45°) with full-time TLSO braces that had compliance temperature monitors. All patients wore their braces at least 12 h a day. Brace failure was defined as curve progression to a surgical magnitude (≥ 50°). All patients were followed until brace discontinuation.

Results

Ninety patients (F 82, M 8) with an average age of 12.1 (10.1-15.0) years, Risser grade 0 (0-2), BMI percentile 48.5 (0.0-98.8), and daily brace wear of 16.5 (12.1-21.6) h/day were treated for 24.3 (8.0-66.6) months. Patients went through 1.7 (1-4) braces on average. Forty-two out of 90 (46.7%) patients had some amount of brace time with an unknown in-brace correction, which, on average, was 66.1% of their total treatment course (11.5-100). On univariate analysis, patients that did not have a repeat in-brace x-ray with major brace adjustments or new brace fabrication tended to be more skeletally immature (Risser 0 and tri-radiate open, p = 0.028), wear more braces throughout their treatment (2.0 vs 1.4, p < 0.001), were treated for a longer period of time (27 vs 22 months, p = 0.022), and failed bracing more often (47.6% vs 22.9%, p = 0.014).

Conclusions

Patients who did not have new in-brace x-rays with major brace adjustments and/or new brace fabrication were 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-7.6) times more likely to fail bracing than patients who were re-checked with new in-brace x-rays.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov—NCT02412137, initial registration date April 2015

Level of evidence

III

Brace Effectiveness Is Related to 3-Dimensional Plane Parameters in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Although scoliosis is a 3-dimensional (3D) deformity, little research has been performed on the use of 3D imaging in brace curve correction. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of axial-plane parameters on the outcomes of bracing with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

This prospective longitudinal cohort study included patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who fulfilled the criteria for bracing according to the Scoliosis Research Society, and was conducted from the time the patient began wearing the brace through a minimum follow-up of 2 years or until a surgical procedure was performed. Radiographs made with use of an EOS Imaging System were used to reconstruct 3D images of the spine at the pre-brace, immediate in-brace, 1-year in-brace, and latest follow-up out-of-brace stages. Univariate and multiple linear regressions were performed to determine the association between axial rotation correction and curve progression at the time of the latest follow-up. Logistic regressions were performed to model the probability of risk of progression.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were enrolled, and 46 patients were included in the analysis. At the time of the latest follow-up, 30 patients did not experience curve progression and 16 patients had curve progression. There was no difference in baseline demographic characteristics between groups. For the transverse-plane parameters, there was a significant difference between non-progression and progression groups in pre-brace apical vertebral rotation (4.5° ± 11.2° compared with -2.4° ± 9.8°, respectively; p = 0.044) and in 1-year in-brace apical vertebral rotation correction velocity (2.0° ± 5.0°/year compared with -1.7° ± 4.4°/year, respectively; p = 0.016). Logistic regression analysis showed that pre-brace apical vertebral rotation (odds ratio, 1.063; 95% confidence interval, 1.000 to 1.131; p = 0.049) and 1-year in-brace apical vertebral rotation correction velocity (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.021 to 1.38; p = 0.026) were associated with an increased risk of curve progression. There was no difference in Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item scores between patients who experienced curve progression and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, we demonstrated that axial-plane parameters and the correction of these parameters during bracing are related to the successful use of the brace.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictors for long-term curve progression after Boston brace treatment of idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Identifying factors that predict successful bracing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis may help planning treatment.

AIM

To assess predictors for long-term curve progression and health-related quality of life after Boston brace treatment.

DESIGN

Observational retrospective cohort study with analysis of brace treated patients followed from start until at least 10 years after treatment.

SETTING

Patients recruited from the country's entire population consecutively treated at the National Hospital.

POPULATION

365 patients (339 girls/26 boys) with idiopathic scoliosis. Mean (SD) chronological age/bone age at start bracing was 13.2 (1.9)/12.6 (1.9) years. The primary major curve measured 33.2 (7.4°), and the major levels were thoracic (N.=248), thoracolumbar (N.=78) and lumbar (N.=39). Mean bracing time was 2.8 (1.5) years. Long-term follow-up was in average 23.3 (4.1) years after weaning with a mean major curve of 33.0 (13.1°). Successful treatment was defined as a stable primary curve with progression ≤5°, and secondary the SRS-22 questionnaire assessed quality of life.

METHODS

We applied linear or logistic regression with backward elimination. Internal validation was assessed by bootstrapping. Twelve variables were included in the prediction models: age, bone age, scoliosis in close family, major curve size, level, shape, flexibility and in-brace redressement, compliance, curve magnitude after 1 year, treatment time and quality of life (SRS-22).

RESULTS

290 patients (79%) had rated good compliance using the brace >20 hours daily. Treatment failure was observed in 65 patients (18%), and 27 of them were operated. The best baseline predictors were age and brace redressement. During treatment compliance, major curve after 1 year, and treatment time were the best predictors, while thoracic major curve, curve size at start bracing and scoliosis in close family also contributed to the final model. The model's ability to predict quality of life was low.

CONCLUSIONS

The best predictors for a long-term success were good redressement and compliance, unchanged or reduced major curve after one year and short treatment time.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Predictors at baseline and during early treatment can help identifying patients who benefit from bracing.

Chiropractic rehabilitation plus nighttime bracing for progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-controlled series

Non-operative treatments for scoliosis include various types of scoliosis-specific exercise therapies, as well as dynamic and rigid spinal orthoses. Although there are many studies evaluating various types of bracing-only constructs for scoliosis treatment, few have evaluated bracing when combined with chiropractic care. The present study analyzed the data of 18 patients from the initiation a chiropractic rehabilitation program combined with nighttime bracing. Patients were managed through the end of growth, and results were compared to baseline. Their collective results were compared to a similar group of previously published patients who participated in the same chiropractic rehabilitation program, but did not perform concurrent bracing treatment. Patients initiating the combined chiropractic and bracing treatment achieved a correction of 6° or more 81% of the time, while the remaining 19% remained within 5° of their baseline measurements. The average curve improvement was 9.4°. This was compared to a correction rate of 51.7%, a stabilization rate of 38.3%, and a progression rate of 10% in the group performing chiropractic rehabilitation only.

Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors for failure-a literature review

Brace treatment is the most common nonoperative treatment for the prevention of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The success reported in level 1 and 2 clinical trials is approximately 75%. The aim of this review was to identify the main risk factors that significantly reduce success rate of brace treatment. A literature search using the MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted. Studies were included if they identified specific risk factor(s) for curve progression. Studies that looked at nighttime braces, superiority of one type of brace over another, the effect of physical therapy on brace performance, cadaver or nonhuman studies were excluded. A total of 1,022 articles were identified of which 25 met all of the inclusion criteria. Seven risk factors were identified: Poor brace compliance (eight studies), lack of skeletal maturity (six studies), Cobb angle over a certain threshold (six studies), poor in-brace correction (three studies), vertebral rotation (four studies), osteopenia (two studies), and thoracic curve type (two studies). Three risk factors were highly repeated in the literature which identified specific subgroups of patients who have a much higher risk to fail brace treatment and to progress to fusion. This data demonstrates that 60% to 70% of the patients referred to bracing are Risser 0 and 30% to 70% of this group will not wear the brace enough to ensure treatment efficacy. Furthermore, Risser 0 patients who reach the accelerated growth phase with a curve ≥40° are at 70% to 100% risk of curve progression to the fusion surgical threshold despite proper brace wear. Skeletally immature patients with relatively large magnitude scoliosis who are noncompliant are at a higher risk of failing brace treatment.

Bracing In The Treatment Of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence To Date

Brace effectiveness for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was controversial until recent studies provided high quality of evidence that bracing can decrease likelihood of progression and need for operative treatment. Very low evidence exists regarding bracing over 40^ο and adult degenerative scoliosis. Initial in-brace correction and compliance seem to be the most important predictive factors for successful treatment outcome. However, the amount of correction and adherence to wearing hours have not been established yet. Moderate evidence suggests that thoracic and double curves, and curves over 30^ο at an early growth stage have more risk for failure. High and low body mass index scores are also associated with low successful rates. CAD/CAM braces have shown better initial correction and are more comfortable than conventional plaster cast braces. For a curve at high risk of progression, rigid and day-time braces are significantly more effective than soft or night-time braces. No safe conclusion on effectiveness can be drawn while comparing symmetrical and asymmetrical brace designs. The addition of physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises in brace treatment can provide better outcomes and is recommended, when possible. Despite the growing evidence for brace effectiveness, there is still an imperative need for future high methodological quality studies to be conducted.

Coronal deformity angular ratio may serve as a valuable parameter to predict in-brace correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In-brace correction (IBC) plays an important role in curve progression of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) under brace treatment. We evaluated the coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) as a potential predictor of IBC. Based on our experience, we postulated that a high C-DAR may result in low IBC. This relationship had not been previously studied.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship of C-DAR and IBC in patients with AIS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 119 patients with AIS treated with a Gensingen brace in our scoliosis center from July 2015 to October 2017 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

In-brace correction.

METHODS

Data were collected before and upon brace placement. Correlation analyses between study variables and IBC were performed. A linear regression model was established on the basis of C-DAR.

RESULTS

At brace fitting, the average age was 12.62±1.16 (range, 10-15) years and mean major curve Cobb angle was 32.14±4.66° (range, 25-40°). Mean IBC was 59.62%±22.03% (range, 16.2-100%). IBC had significant correlation with C-DAR (r=-0.69; 95% confidence interval, -0.77 to -0.61; p<.001). IBC was not significantly correlated with age, sex, height, weight, BMI, menstrual status, or Risser sign. A simple linear regression model established that in-brace correction=115.4-10.7×C-DAR.

CONCLUSIONS

C-DAR has strong negative correlation with IBC and may estimate the expected IBC. The usage of C-DAR may obviate the need for flexibility radiographs, such as supine or supine lateral bending radiographs.

[Claims and realities of brace treatment : Primary correction of scoliosis in children and adolescents]

BACKGROUND

It is understood that an effective brace therapy requires a primary curve angle reduction of 50% after administering the first orthotic brace.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of conservative brace therapy for scoliosis with a curve angle above 20° and to determine possible influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study included a cohort of 110 scoliosis patients with conservative brace therapy. The development of the scoliotic curve during brace therapy was documented for an average of 40 months. Influencing factors such as the initial Risser sign, age at the start of treatment, gender, curve patterns and body mass index were analyzed.

RESULTS

The collective consisted of 88 patients with idiopathic and 22 with neuromuscular spinal deformities. At the beginning of the brace therapy, the average age was 12.2 ± 2.8 years with a mean scoliosis curve angle of 30.4° ± 12.5°. The primary brace reduced the scoliotic curve by 31% to 20.9°. In children and adolescents with lower maturity status, the success of the brace therapy was greater than in patients with a higher Risser sign. In addition, children with obesity had less success during brace therapy than normal- or underweight children.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial curvature correction of 50% required for effective brace therapy could only be achieved in one third of the patients. On average, the correction was 31%.

Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Curve Between 40° and 45°: Effectiveness and Related Factors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effectiveness of brace treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with curve between 40° and 45° and to determine predictive factors associated with bracing outcome.

METHODS

Bracing was used to treat 90 patients with curve >40 degrees. Factors including Risser sign, age, sex, curve pattern, curve magnitude, and initial curve correction were compared between patients with curve improvement and patients with curve progression. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of curve progression.

RESULTS

Curve was improved in 34 (37.8%) patients and stabilized in 12 (13.3%) patients. Remarkable curve progression >50 degrees was observed in 44 (48.9%) patients. Intergroup comparison showed significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age (12.3 ± 1.4 years vs. 13.2 ± 1.6 years, P = 0.01), initial curve correction (2.2% ± 5.4% vs. 19.7% ± 12.2%, P < 0.001), and curve pattern (P = 0.03). Logistic regression analysis showed that initial curve correction of <10% (odds ratio = 12.82, P < 0.001) and Risser grade of 0 (odds ratio = 1.46, P = 0.04) were significant indicators of curve progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Bracing may produce a favorable outcome in certain patients with curve between 40° and 45°. It should be cautiously used in this situation, as there was a higher probability of bracing failure. It is important to differentiate patients at high risk of curve progression at an early stage to avoid overtreatment.

Factors That Influence In-Brace Correction in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors affecting in-brace correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with AIS receiving Gensingen brace treatment in our scoliosis center from July 2015 to October 2017 was performed. The selection of patients was in accordance with the Scoliosis Research Society inclusion criteria for a bracing study. Some radiographic and clinical parameters, including the Cobb angle, rib-vertebra angle difference, coronal and sagittal balance, lumbar-pelvic relationship (LPR), Risser sign, curve type, age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, and menstrual status were collected. The correlation and difference analyses were performed to identify the factors influencing in-brace correction.

RESULTS

A cohort of 112 patients with AIS (94 girls and 18 boys) were included in the present study. The mean in-brace correction was 59.29% ± 22.33% (range, 16.22%-100.00%). In-brace correction showed a significantly negative correlation with the major curve Cobb angle, minor curve Cobb angle, total curve Cobb angle, and LPR (P < 0.05 for all). Sagittal and coronal imbalance could reduce the curve correction (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). The remaining parameters were not related to in-brace correction.

CONCLUSIONS

In-brace correction in the present study was 59.29% ± 22.33% (range, 16.22%-100.00%). Some factors, including the Cobb angle, sagittal and coronal balance, and LPR, have an effect on in-brace correction. The results from the present study can provide some useful information for brace design and fabrication.

Association between braced curve behavior by pubertal growth peak and bracing effectiveness in female idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pre-pubertal idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is associated with high risk of bracing ineffectiveness. Integrated multidimensional maturity assessments are useful but complex to predict the high-risk occurrence of curve progression. This study is designed to provide a simple screening method for brace effectiveness by determining whether or not the braced curve behavior at growth spurt, being defined as variations in Cobb angle velocity (AV) at peak height velocity (PHV), can be a new factor predictive of brace outcome prescribed before PHV.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a series of 35 IS girls with simplified skeletal maturity score no more than 3 at initiation of bracing treatment and followed up through the growth spurt until brace weaning or surgery. Serial Cobb angle and maturity indicators involving height velocity, Risser sign, triradiate cartilage, simplified skeletal maturity score and distal radius and ulna classification were assessed and patients were stratified into either a positive or negative category based on a positive or negative value of AV at PHV. Comparisons were made between the positive and negative AV groups, as well as the failed and successful bracing groups, using independent sample T test and crosstab analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictive factors of failed brace treatment.

RESULTS

Brace treatment prescribed before PHV was found to have an overall failure rate of 57.1% and a surgical rate of 45.7%. Negative AV at PHV accounting for 54.3% of the recruited patients were associated with lower brace failure rate (36.8% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.016) and surgical rate (21.1% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.002). Patients in the failed bracing group showed higher ratio of thoracic curve (80.0% vs. 26.7%,p = 0.002) and higher AV at growth peak (2.3 ± 9.1 vs. -6.5 ± 11.4°/yrs., p = 0.016). The logistic regression analysis revealed that positive AV at PHV (OR = 9.268, 95% CI = 1.279-67.137, p = 0.028) and thoracic curve type (OR = 13.391, 95% CI = 2.006-89.412, p = 0.007) were strong predictive factors of ineffective brace treatment initiated before PHV.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained curve correction following bracing despite early onset and rapid pubertal growth was strongly predictive of effective brace control of scoliosis.

The Role of Correction in the Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Introduction:

Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises (PSSE) and bracing have been found to be effective in the stabilization of curves in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Yet, the difference among the many PSSEs and braces has not been studied. The present review attempts to investigate the role of curve correction in the outcome of treatment for PSSEs and braces.

Material and Methods:

A PubMed manual search has been conducted for studies on the role of correction in the effectiveness of PSSE and bracing. For the PSSEs, the key words used were “adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, correction, physiotherapy, physical therapy, exercise, and rehabilitation.” For bracing, the key words used were “adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, correction and brace”. Only papers that were published from 2001-2017 were included and reviewed, as there were very few relevant papers dating earlier than 2001.

Results:

The search found no studies on the role of correction on the effectiveness of different PSSEs. The effectiveness of different PSSEs might or might not be related to the magnitude of curve correction during the exercises. However, many studies showed a relationship between the magnitude of in-brace correction and the outcome of the brace treatment.

Discussion:

The role of correction on the effectiveness of PSSE has not been studied. In-brace correction, however, has been found to be associated with the outcome of brace treatment. An in-brace correction of < 10% was associated with an increased rate of failure of brace treatment, whereas an in-brace correction of >40-50% was associated with an increased rate of brace treatment success (i.e. stabilization or improvement of curves). Thus, in the treatment of AIS, patients should be advised to use highly corrective braces, in conjunction with PSSE since exercises have been found to help stabilize the curves during weaning of the brace. Presently, no specific PSSE can be recommended.

Conclusion:

Braces of high in-brace correction should be used in conjunction with PSSEs in the treatment of AIS. No specific PSSE can be recommended as comparison studies of the effectiveness of different PSSEs are not found at the time of this study.

Low body mass index can be predictive of bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study

PURPOSES

To determine the relationship between low body mass index (BMI) and the outcome of brace treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

350 braced female AIS patients were included in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patient were recorded at their first visit, including age, Risser sign, digital skeletal age, BMI, curve pattern, and curve magnitude. Underweight was defined as lower than the 5th percentile of the sex- and age-specific BMI. The treatment was considered as a failure if the curve progressed more than 5°, or if patients underwent surgery. According to the final outcome of brace treatment, the cohort was divided into the success group and the failure group. A logistic regression model was created to determine the independent predictors of the bracing outcome.

RESULTS

24.5% (86/350) of the patients were identified as underweight at their initial visit, which was significantly higher than the rate of 13.1% (46/350) at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). At the initial visit of the patients, the rate of underweight was 17.6% (45/255) in the success group, which was significantly lower than the rate of 43.1% (41/95) in the failure group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that low BMI was significantly associated with bracing failure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The low BMI could be predictive of bracing failure in AIS patients, which should be taken into account when surgeons prescribe brace treatment to such patients.