A New Method of Measuring the Occipitocervical Angle That Could be Applied as an Intraoperative Indicator During Occipitocervical Fusion

Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the risk factors for developing dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) and investigate possible mechanisms and prognosis.

METHODS

The case data of 43 patients who underwent OCF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (dysphagia group) and group B (non-dysphagia group) based on Bazaz scoring criteria. Baseline data and imaging parameters were collected: O-C2 angle, C2-7 angle, pharyngeal inlet angle (PIA), posterior occipital cervical angle (POCA), O-EA angle, Oc-Ax angle, Atlas-dens interval, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS), and thickness of the prevertebral soft tissue. Potential risk factors were identified via one-way intergroup comparisons and included in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess associations between dnPAS% and each parameter and inter-parameter correlations. Predictors were selected to plot receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for diagnostic evaluation. Prognosis was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and curvilinear regression.

RESULTS

Dysphagia occurred in 17 of 43 patients (39.53%). By the final follow-up (≥ 12 months), 11 patients (25.58%) had residual symptoms. Baseline factors, including dyspnea (P = 0.028), operative segment (P = 0.021), operative time (P = 0.006), anesthesia time (P = 0.025), solitude (P = 0.019), and satisfaction (P < 0.001), differed significantly between groups. Imaging parameters dO-C2a (P < 0.001), dPOCA (P < 0.001), PoPIA (P = 0.036), dPIA (P < 0.001), dOc-Axa (P = 0.001), dC2-7 SVA (P = 0.040), PonPAS (P = 0.004), dnPAS (P = 0.005), and dnPAS% (P < 0.001) were also significantly different. Multivariable regression analysis identified dPIA (OR = 0.870, P = 0.008) as an independent protective factor. ROC analysis showed dPIA had good diagnostic value (AUC = 0.855) with a cutoff of -8°. Prognostic analysis indicated rapid recovery was possible by 3 months postoperatively, with full recovery achieved in ~ 30% of patients by 1 year, after which recovery plateaued.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative dysphagia after OCF appears to result from multiple factors involving both "static + dynamic" elements. dPIA is a reliable predictor, with patients having a dPIA >-8° being less likely to develop dysphagia. However, only ~ 30% of patients achieve full recovery.

Radiographic Prediction of the Occipito-C2 Angle Variation with Changes in Distance between the Mandible and Cervical Vertebrae: A Preliminary Study

The Occipito (O) -C2 angle reflects the correct craniocervical spine alignment; however, the poor image quality of standard intraoperative fluoroscopy at times lead to inaccurate measurements. Herein, we preliminarily investigated the relationship between the O-C2 angle and the Gonion-C2 distance, which is based on the positioning of the mandible and the cervical spine. We enrolled patients who underwent cervical spine radiography in neutral, flexion, and extension positions from January 2020 to October 2020. The difference by posture changes for each parameter was defined as the Δ value, and the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was determined. Furthermore, we determined the cutoff value of the ΔGonion-C2 distance to predict a decrease of > 10° in the ΔO-C2 angle, which is reported to be related to dysphagia and dyspnea. Seventy-four patients were included. Spearman's rank correlations for the neutral, flexion, and extension positions were 0.630 (P < 0.001), 0.471 (P < 0.001), and 0.625 (P < 0.001), respectively, while the cutoff values of the ΔGonion-C2 distance for predicting > 10° in the ΔO-C2 angle were 9.3 mm for the neutral flexion change (sensitivity: 0.435, specificity: 0.882) and 8.3 mm for the extension-neutral change (sensitivity: 0.712, specificity: 0.909). The O-C2 angle and Gonion-C2 distances correlated; however, this correlation was weaker in the flexed position. Nevertheless, the ΔGonion-C2 distance can be used as a warning sign for postoperative complications after posterior occipital bone fusion surgery, because a decrease of > 10° in the ΔO-C2 angle can be predicted with high specificity.

A new radiological parameter as a predictor of dysphagia based on oro-pharyngeal stenosis in a cohort of pediatric patients undergoing mal-reduced C1-2 pedicle screw fixation

PURPOSE

C1 pedicle screw technique showed further advantages since it avoids the negative results from the sacrificed range of motion of the atlantooccipital joint compared to the occipitocervical fusion. However, some intractable complications are unavoidable. In the pediatric population, dysphagia after the atlantoaxial fixation can be accidentally serious. We aimed to determine the incidence of dysphagia in the pediatric population's cohort and its radiological predictor.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and August 2018, this retrospective study included 42 pediatric patients with atlantoaxial dislocation due to trauma. They were followed up with an average duration of 8 years (range 5-18 years). Twenty-seven were males and 15 females with a mean age of 8.2 years (range 5-15 years) when undergoing operations. Patients were classified according to the presence of postoperative dysphagia according to the Bazaz dysphagia grading scale. The measurements, including pre- and postoperative CVT/NSL, O-C2, and C2-C7 sagittal angles, were performed.

RESULTS

26.2% of the patients (11/42) experienced postoperative dysphagia. A significant difference in the postoperative CVT/NSL (115.2 ± 13.2 vs.134.8 ± 17.3, P = 0.002), ΔCVT/NSL (7.0 ± 11.2 vs. 20.3 ± 10.5, P = 0.001), ΔO-C2 (- 3.2 ± 5.8 vs. 2.1 ± 5.1, P = 0.026), postoperative nPAS (9.4 ± 3.7 vs. 12.6 ± 4.2, P = 0.031) and ΔPAS (- 1.5 ± 4.1 vs. 2.0 ± 3.5, P = 0.010) between dysphagia group and non-dysphagia group were found. Adjustment for age, gender, and BMI, the multivariate logistic analysis showed that ΔCVT/NSL < 8.35° (OR = 5.23; 95% CI 4.97-5.50; P = 0.001) and ΔO-C2 (OR = 3.34; 95% CI 3.17-3.51; P = 0.001) remained associated with the occurrence of the swallowing problems.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with ΔO-C2, ΔCVT/NSL might better predict postoperative dysphagia in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

[Research on effectiveness of occipito-odontoid angle in predicting dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion in patients with C 2, 3 Klippel-Feil syndrome]

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new occipitocervical angle parameter, occipito-odontoid angle (O-Da), for predicting dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) in patients with C _{2, 3} Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) and analyze its effectiveness.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients met selective criteria between April 2010 and November 2019 were retrospectively included as the study subjects. There were 56 males and 63 females. The age ranged from 14 to 76 years, with a median age of 51 years. There were 44 cases of basilar invagination and 75 cases of atlantoaxial subluxation. Forty patients were combined with C _{2, 3} KFS. Seven patients underwent anterior decompression combined with posterior OCF and 112 patients underwent posterior OCF. The fixed segments were O-C ₂ in 36 cases, O-C ₃ in 51 cases, O-C ₄ in 25 cases, and O-C ₅ in 7 cases. All patients were followed up 21-136 months, with a median time of 79 months. The lateral cervical X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up were used to measure the occipital to C ₂ angle (O-C ₂a), the occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa), the occipital protuberance to axial angle (Oc-Axa), the O-Da, and the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS). The differences of the above parameters between the last follow-up and the preoperative values were calculated (represented as dO-C ₂a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, dO-Da, and dnPAS). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they suffered dysphagia after operation, and the differences in clinical data and radiographic parameters were compared between the two groups. The correlation between occipitocervical angle parameters and nPAS in 40 patients with C _{2, 3} KFS was analyzed respectively. In addition, sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to assess the effectiveness of dO-Da≤-5° for the prediction of postoperative dysphagia.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (26.1%) suffered dysphagia after OCF (dysphagia group), including 10 patients with C _{2, 3} KFS; no dysphagia occurred in 88 patients (non-dysphagia group). There was no significant difference in age, follow-up time, fixed segment, proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, proportion of patients with atlantoaxial subluxation, and proportion of patients with C _{2, 3} KFS between the two groups ( P>0.05). The proportion of female patients was significantly higher in dysphagia group than in non-dysphagia group ( χ ²=7.600, P=0.006). The difference in preoperative O-C ₂a between the two groups was significant ( t=2.528, P=0.014). No significant differences were observed in preoperative O-EAa, Oc-Axa, O-Da, and nPAS ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in dO-C ₂a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, dO-Da, and dnPAS between the two groups ( P>0.05). The dO-C ₂a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, and dO-Da were positively correlated with dnPAS in 40 patients with C _{2, 3} KFS ( r=0.604, P<0.001; r=0.649, P<0.001; r=0.615, P<0.001; r=0.672, P<0.001). Taking dO-Da≤-5° as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity of dO-Da to predict postoperative dysphagia in patients with C _{2, 3} KFS were 80.0% (8/10) and 93.3% (28/30), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The dO-Da is a reliable indicator for predicting dysphagia after OCF in patients with C _{2, 3} KFS.

The predictive ability of occipital to C3 angle for dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion in patients with combined C2-3 Klippel-Feil syndrome

Background

Improper occipitocervical alignment after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) may lead to devastating complications, such as dysphagia and/or dyspnea. The occipital to C2 angle (O-C2a), occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa) have been used to evaluate occipitospinal alignment. However, it may be difficult to identify the inferior endplate of the C2 vertebra in patients with C2–3 Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS). The purpose of this study aimed to compare four different parameters for predicting dysphagia after OCF in patients with C2–3 KFS.

Methods

There were 40 patients with C2–3 KFS undergoing OCF between 2010 and 2019. Radiographs of these patients were collected to measure the occipital to C3 angle (O-C3a), O-C2a, occipito-odontoid angle (O-Da), occipital to axial angle (Oc-Axa), and narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS). The presence of dysphagia was defined as the patient complaining of difficulty or excess endeavor to swallow. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had postoperative dysphagia. We evaluated the relationship between each of the angle parameters and nPAS and analyzed their influence to the postoperative dysphagia.

Results

The incidence of dysphagia after OCF was 25% in patients with C2–3 KFS. The Oc-Axa, and nPAS were smaller in the dysphagia group compared to non-dysphagia group at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that dO-C3a had the highest accuracy as a predictor of the dysphagia with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868. The differences in O-C3a, O-C2a, O-Da, and Oc-Axa were all linearly correlated with nPAS scores preoperatively and at the final follow-up within C2–3 KFS patients, while there was a higher R² value between the dO-C3a and dnPAS. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the difference of O-C3a was the only significant predictor for dnPAS (β = 0.670, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The change of O-C3a (dO-C3a) is the most reliable indicator for evaluating occipitocervical alignment and predicting postoperative dysphagia in C2–3 KFS patients. Moreover, dO-C3a should be more than − 2° during OCF to reduce the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia.

Predictive value of sagittal craniocervical roentgenographic parameters for HRQOL after craniocervical fusion

PURPOSE

Loss of "physiological" sagittal alignment following craniocervical fusion (CCF) for degenerative disease may be associated with loss of horizontal gaze, dysphagia and poor HRQOL. This study reports on sagittal craniocervical roentgenographic predictors of HRQOL (SF-36) in patients following uncomplicated CCF for fresh upper cervical traumatic (UCT) injuries.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive adult patients (group P) aged 50 ± 16 years, who had undergone CCF for fresh unstable C₁ and C₂AO/type UCT injuries, were evaluated 39 ± 12 months postoperatively with upright lateral cervical roentgenograms and SF-36as HRQOL measure. Physiological data for cervical sagittal alignment and SF-36 were taken from an age-matched control group (C) of 30 individuals aged 52 ± 12 years. Several commonly used sagittal cervical roentgenographic parameters were tested as potential predictors of the SF-36 domains in both groups. Roentgenographic predictors for each of the nine SF-domains were calculated using stepwise multilinear regression analysis (MLRA).

RESULTS

The roentgenographic predictors in patients included (1) the angle created by McGregor's line and the inferior surface of the axis (OC₂a) for physical function (PF, P = 0.049), role limitations due to physical health (RLPH, P = 0.004),role limitation due to emotional problems (RLEP, P = 0.004), emotional functioning (EF) (P = 0.012), social functioning (SF) (P = 0.028) and general health (GH, P = 0.041). (2) The angle formed between a horizontal line and the superior endplate of T₁-vertebra (T₁-slope) was predictor for SF (P = 0.017) and pain (P = 0.021), and (3) the angle between McGregor's line and the line that links the center of the C₁ anterior arch and the apex of cervical sagittal curvature (PIA) was predictor for health change (HC, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that postoperative OC₂a, PIA and T1-slope safely predict HRQOL outcomes (SF-36) following CCF for fresh trauma. It seems theoretically that the adequate restoration of the upper cervical alignment including C1-C2 upper cervical lordosis (OC₂a) and PIA, in interaction with T1-slope, is important for postoperative HRQOL scores close to physiological values. The authors speculate that C0-C4 fusion restores horizontal gaze and allows for painful regain of pre-trauma quality of life. Spine surgeons should realign and stabilize the craniocervical junction taking in consideration these roentgenographic predictors.

A radiologic parameter that could be applied in the development of sleep apnea in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing occipitocervical fusion

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of sleep apnea in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with occipitocervical lesions was 79%. Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) could incur sleep apnea or worsen this condition. Recent studies reported that this complication is caused by stenosis of the oropharyngeal airway accompanying a decrease in the occipitoaxial angle (O-C2a). However, there are several limitations to the application of the O-C2a, which decreases its effectiveness. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between a new radiologic parameter, the CVT/NSL angle (CVT: craniocervical inclination in the second and fourth vertebrae; NSL: Nasion-Sella line), and sleep apnea in RA patients accepting OCF.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients who underwent OCF due to upper cervical lesions secondary to RA and had sleep apnea before surgery were analyzed. Those who have a postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 15 and a ΔAHI ≥50% were considered "responders"; patients were otherwise considered "non-responders." They were analyzed whether pre- and postoperative radiologic parameters and their differences in plain lateral radiographs were correlated to the parameter related to sleep apnea.

RESULTS

The included patients have a mean AHI of 21.9 (range, 10 to 52) before surgery. The mean postoperative CVT/NSLa, ΔCVT/NSLa, andΔO-C2a in complete responders were significantly greater compared with non-responders (p < 0.05). Both the changes in the CVT/NSLa and O-C2a were linearly correlated within patients. However, the R² value for the CVT/NSLa was greater compared with the O-C2a (0.403 vs. 0.203).

CONCLUSIONS

The usefulness of the new craniovertebral angle, CVT/NSLa, as an intraoperative indicator during OCF, is more valuable in comparison with the conventional method of measuring the O-C2a. Measuring the craniovertebral angle is extremely important in the planning of surgical treatment for the development of sleep apnea in rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing occipitocervical fusion.

3D-Printed Screw-Rod Auxiliary System for Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

Objective

To develop and validate the efficacy of a 3D‐printed screw‐rod auxiliary system for unstable atlas fractures.

Methods

This research is a retrospective analysis, and a total of 14 patients, including 11 males and three females, were enrolled in our hospital from January 2017 to March 2019 who underwent occipitocervical fusion assisted by the 3D‐printed screw‐rod auxiliary system were reviewed, and with an average age of 53.21 ± 14.81 years, an average body mass index (BMI) of 23.61 ± 1.93 kg/m². The operation time, blood loss and radiation times during the operation were recorded. The maximum fracture displacement values of pre‐ and post‐operation were measured based on CT imaging. All screw grades were evaluated after surgery. The occipital‐cervical 2 (O‐C₂) angle and occipitocervical inclination (OCI) angle of pre‐operation, post‐operation and the last following‐up were measured. The dysphagia scale 3 months after surgery and at the last follow‐up, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) 3 months after surgery and at the last follow‐up were assessed.

Results

All patients were completed the surgery successfully. There was no patient with severe dysphagia or aggravation of nerve injury. The follow‐up was from 12 to 14 months, and with an average of 12.5 months. The average surgery time, average blood loss and average radiation times for the 14 patients were 112.14 min, 171.43 mL and 5.07 times, respectively. There was a significant difference in maximum fracture displacement between pre‐ and post‐operation values (P < 0.05). A total of 56 screws were inserted in 14 patients, among them, three screws were classified as grade 1, and the other screws were classified as grade 0. There was a significant difference in the O‐C₂ between pre‐operation and 3 days after operation (P = 0.002); There was a significant difference in OCI angles between pre‐operation and 3 days after operation (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the O‐C₂ or OCI angle between 3 days after the operation and the last follow‐up (P = 0.079; P = 0.201). The dysphagia scales of two patients were assessed as mild at 3 months after surgery, and the others were assessed as normal at 3 months after surgery. All patients' dysphagia scores returned to normal at the last follow‐up. The average NDI and average neck Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at the last follow‐up were 2.53 and 8.41, respectively.

Conclusion

It can objectively restore the OCI to normal with few post‐operative complications under the assistance of a screw‐rod auxiliary system to perform occipitocervical fusion for unstable atlas fractures and atlantooccipital joint instability.

[Predictive abilities of O-C2 angle, O-EA angle, and Oc-Ax angle for the development of dysphagia in patients after occipitocervical fusion]

Objective

To compare the predictive abilities of O-C2 angle (O-C2a), O-EA angle (O-EAa), and Oc-Ax angle (Oc-Axa) for development of dysphagia in patients after occipitocervical fusion (OCF).

Methods

Between April 2010 and May 2019, 114 patients who underwent OCF and met the selection criteria were selected as the research objects. Among them, 54 were males and 60 were females; they were 14-76 years old, with an average of 50.6 years old. The follow-up time was 13-122 months (median, 60.5 months). The O-C2a, O-EAa, Oc-Axa, and the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS) were measured by the lateral X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up, and the differences before and after operation (dO-C2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, and dnPAS) were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had developed postoperative dysphagia. The general data including age, gender, fixed segment, proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atlantoaxial subluxation (AS), and combined with anterior release surgery (ARS), and imaging indicators were compared between the two groups. The correlations between dO-C2a, dO-EAa, and dOc-Axa and dnPAS in 114 patients were analyzed to further compare the predictive value of three imaging indicators for occurrence of dysphagia after OCF.

Results

Dysphagia occurred after OCF in 31 cases with the incidence of 27.2%. There was significant difference in gender between the dysphagia group and the non-dysphagia group ( χ ²=7.940, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, fixed segment, the proportion of patients with RA, the proportion of patients with AS, and the proportion of patients combined with ARS ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in O-C2a and Oc-Axa of 114 patients before operation and at last follow-up ( P>0.05). The differences in O-EAa and nPAS were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative O-EAa, Oc-Axa, and nPAS between the dysphagia group and the non-dysphagia group ( P>0.05); the difference in the O-C2a was significant ( t=2.470, P=0.016). At last follow-up, the differences in the above imaging indicators were significant ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in the dO-C2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa, and dnPAS between the two groups ( P<0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the dO-C2a, dO-EAa, dOc-Axa were all positively correlated with dnPAS ( P<0.05). The dO-C2a≤-5°, postoperative O-EAa≤100°, postoperative Oc-Axa≤65° were all related to postoperative dysphagia ( P<0.05), and the highest risk factor suffering postoperative dysphagia was dO-C2a ≤-5° with a significant OR of 14.4.

Conclusion

The dO-C2a, postoperative O-EAa, and postoperative Oc-Axa can be used as the predictive indexes of dysphagia after OCF, among which dO-C2a has the highest predictive value.

Predictive ability of pharyngeal inlet angle for the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion

Background

PIA has been proven to be a predictor for postoperative dysphagia in patients who undergo occipitospinal fusion. However, its predictive effect for postoperative dysphagia in patients who undergo OCF is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of the pharyngeal inlet angle (PIA) for the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia in patients who undergo occipitocervical fusion (OCF).

Methods

Between 2010 and 2018, 98 patients who had undergone OCF were enrolled and reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of postoperative dysphagia. Radiographic parameters, including the atlas-dens interval (ADI), O-C2 angle (O-C2a), occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa), C2 tilting angle (C2Ta), C2-7 angle (C2-7a), PIA and narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS), were measured and compared. Simple linear regression and multiple regression analysis were used to evaluate the radiographic predictors for dysphagia. In addition, we used PIA = 90° as a threshold to analyze its effect on predicting dysphagia.

Results

Of the 98 patients, 26 exhibited postoperative dysphagia. Preoperatively, PIA in the dysphagia group was significantly higher than that in the nondysphagia group. We detected that O-C2a, O-EAa, PIA and nPAS all decreased sharply in the dysphagia group but increased slightly in the nondysphagia group. The changes were all significant. Through regression analyses, we found that PIA had a similar predictive effect as O-EAa for postoperative dysphagia and changes in nPAS. Additionally, patients with an increasing PIA exhibited no dysphagia, and the sensitivity of PIA <90° in predicting dysphagia reached 88.5%.

Conclusions

PIA could be used as a predictor for postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing OCF. Adjusting a PIA level higher than the preoperative PIA level could avoid dysphagia. For those who inevitably had decreasing PIA, preserving intraoperative PIA over 90° would help avert postoperative dysphagia.

Trial registration

This trial has been registered in the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The registration number is 762 and the date of registration is Sep. 9 th, 2019.

The mandible-C2 angle: a new radiographic assessment of occipitocervical alignment

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Occipitocervical fusion is a rare and often challenging surgical procedure. Significant morbidity can result if care is not taken to achieve physiologic alignment. This is especially true for patients needing occipitocervical fusion in the setting of trauma where preoperative alignment is unknown.

PURPOSE

To assess the radiographic angles normally subtended between the C2 body and the mandible ramus, in a series of patients with neutral physiologic alignment and no pathology, and to assess its validity as a possible intraoperative radiographic tool to determine a neutral craniocervical alignment.

DESIGN

Validation and reliability study of radiographic parameters.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Hundred lateral, neutral, cervical radiographs from patients with "normal" radiographic findings.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic parameters of occipital-cervical alignment with assessment of reliability and correlation in data.

METHODS

One hundred neutral lateral cervical spine radiographs in the upright position of patients with no complaints or known pathology were obtained from two medical clinics between December of 2014 and January of 2017. Three physicians, at different levels of spine surgery training, took measurements of radiographic parameters. The new technique used four different angles measured between the C2-body/dens complex and the mandibular ramus (anterior/posterior C2 body and anterior/posterior mandible lines angles), and compared these with the Occipito-C2 angle, which is a validated assessment of occipitocervical alignment. Statistical analysis was performed to assess correlation in data and measure reproducibility.

RESULTS

Between the three reviewers, the mean±standard deviation were 18.0°±6.5° for Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2A), -4.2°±5.4° for anterior C2-body/anterior mandible line angle (AB/AM), -4.2°±5.9° for anterior C2-body/posterior mandible line angle (AB/PM), 5.1°±5.8° for posterior C2 body/anterior mandible line angle (PB/AM) and 5.6°±6.2° for posterior C2 body/ posterior mandible line angle (PB/PM). Overall the measurements obtained were correlative with an appropriate range for the standard deviation. Mean intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.889 for O-C2A, 0.795 for AB/AM, 0.859 for AB/PM, 0.876 for PB/AM, and 0.750 for PB/PM, showing high interobserver reliability for all the radiographic measures. Across the five techniques, 87%-92% of measurements fell within 10° of the median, 76%-83% fell within 7.5°, and 55%-66% within 5°.

CONCLUSIONS

The mandible-C2 angle offers a reproducible alternative to the validated O-C2A technique for determining appropriate intraoperative occipitocervical alignment, which may be especially useful when preoperative radiographic alignment is unknown, such as occurs with trauma patients, with the goal of decreasing alignment-related complications in the setting of occipitocervical stabilization.

Is it Suitable to Fix the Occipito-C2 Angle and the Posterior Occipitocervical Angle in a Normal Range During Occipitocervical Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was (1) to measure the occipito-C2 angle (OC2A) and the posterior occipitocervical angle (POCA) in a normal population, and (2) to observe the effects of OC2A and POCA selection on postoperative clinical efficacy and lower cervical curvature after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) in patients with basilar invagination (BI) and atlantoaxial fracture and dislocation (AAFD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

OC2A has received special attention with respect to the clinical efficacy during OCF. However, none of studies have focused on the relationship between OC2A and POCA and have assessed their impact on clinical outcomes in patients with different occipiocervical diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty healthy subjects without any cervical disease (healthy group) were randomly selected based on sex and age. Three spine surgeons measured the OC2A and POCA in the healthy group and averaged the values. Forty-two patients with BI (BI group) and 32 patients with AAFD (AAFD group) who underwent OCF between January 2012 and January 2017 were reviewed. OC2A, POCA, and cervical spinal angle (CSA) were measured preoperatively, postoperatively immediately after surgery and ambulation, and at the final follow-up visit. The preoperative and final follow-up visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and the change of CSA from postoperatively immediately after surgery and ambulation to the final follow-up (dCSA) were recorded.

RESULTS

The values of OC2A and POCA were 14.5±3.7 and 108.2±8.1 degrees in the healthy group, respectively, and the respective 95% confidence intervals were 7.2-21.8 and 92.3-124.0 degrees as the normal range. There was a negative correlation between OC2A and POCA (r=-0.386, P<0.001). The preoperative value of OC2A (5.6±4.3 degrees) in BI group was smaller than that in the healthy group (P<0.05); however, the preoperative value of POCA (123.0±10.4 degrees) in the BI group was larger than that in the healthy group (P<0.05). There was no significantly different of OC2A and POCA between the healthy group and the AAFD group before the operation (P>0.05). The preoperative value of CSA (25.7±9.5 degrees) in the BI group was larger than that in the AAFD group (16.5±5.1 degrees) (P<0.05). In the BI group, 26 patients had ideal OC2A and POCA (both within 95% confidence interval of the healthy group) postoperatively immediately after surgery and ambulation as a subgroup of the ideal angle group. In the remaining patients with BI (nonideal angle group), VAS, JOA, and NDI at the final follow-up were significantly better than those in the ideal angle group (P<0.05). The ideal angle group showed statistically greater dCSA than the nonideal angle group of the BI group (P<0.05). On the contrary, in the AAFD group, the NDI in the ideal angle group (20 patients) was better than that in the nonideal angle group at the final follow-up, and the ideal angle group had a smaller dCSA compared with the nonideal angle group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The biomechanical balance of occipitocervical region in patients with occipitocervical diseases with different pathogenesis is different. On the basis of the different types of occipitocervical diseases, an appropriate range of OC2A and POCA should be selected by the surgeon during OCF, which can further improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the loss of the lower cervical curvature after surgery.

Importance of the Occipitoaxial Angle and Posterior Occipitocervical Angle in Occipitocervical Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effects of occipitoaxial angle (O-C2 angle, OC2A) and posterior occipitocervical angle (POCA) selection on postoperative clinical efficacy and lower cervical curvature in patients with acute acquired atlantoaxial dislocation after occipitocervical fusion (OCF).

METHODS

A total of 150 healthy subjects without cervical disease (healthy group) were randomly selected based on gender and age. Three spine surgeons measured the OC2A and POCA of the healthy group and averaged the values. A total of 30 patients with an average age of 51.0 years (range, 18-70 years; 16 male and 14 female) with trauma or rheumatoid arthritis (disease group) who underwent occipitocervical fusion (OCF) for atlantoaxial dislocation between January 2012 and June 2016 were reviewed. OC2A, POCA, and cervical spinal angle (CSA) were measured postoperative/soon after surgery and ambulation, and at the final follow-up visit. The preoperative and final follow-up visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese orthopedics association score (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and dCSA (change of CSA from postoperative/soon after surgery and ambulation to final follow-up) were recorded.

RESULTS

The values of OC2A and POCA in 150 healthy subjects were 14.5° ± 3.7° and 108.2° ± 8.1°, respectively, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were 7.2°-21.8° and 92.3°-124.0°, respectively. There was a negative correlation between OC2A and POCA (r = -0.386, P < 0.001). There were 18 patients (group one) of ideal OC2A and POCA (both within 95% CI of the healthy group) postoperative/soon after surgery and ambulation with a mean follow-up time of 26.3 ± 20.9 months in disease group. The remaining patients (group two) with a mean follow-up time of 31.3 ± 21.3 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data as well as pre-operative outcomes, including VAS score, JOA score, and NDI between the two groups. Likewise, the post-operative outcomes in final follow-up, including VAS and JOA score, had no distinct difference in the two groups. However, NDI (11.0 ± 2.9) in group two at the final follow-up was significantly higher than that in group one (7.0 ± 2.3) (P < 0.001). And group two showed statistically greater dCSA (5.9 ± 7.5°) than group one (-2.3° ± 6.2°) (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The negative correlation between OC2A and POCA plays an important role in maintaining the biodynamic balance of the occipital-cervical region. OC2A and POCA should be controlled of a normal population in patients with acute acquired atlantoaxial dislocation during OCF, which can further improve the clinical efficacy and prevent loss of lower cervical curvature after surgery.