Ulnar head replacement

Decompression corrective osteotomy of the distal radius for treatment of the DRUJ-incongruency and impingement syndrome with focus on posttraumatic cases

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic or congenital ulna-minus variance with altered shape of the sigmoid notch and increased tension of the distal oblique band of the interosseous membrane (DIOM) can lead to painful impingement in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) during rotation and loading of the forearm. As an operative treatment concept, a new method was described in 2016. Its goal is to restore the osseous congruency, which is required for normal painless function. The hypothesis is based on remodelling of the joint surface and the decompression of the DRUJ by releasing the DIOM. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of performed operations with detailed focus on posttraumatic cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The indication for the operation is the impingement and incongruency in the DRUJ with ulna-minus variance. The surgical procedure is based on shortening and closed-wedge osteotomy of the distal radius with an ulnar translation of the radial shaft. Fifty-nine operations were performed between 2011 - 2022 on 52 patients (13 men, 39 women). Twenty-four patients were operated on the right side, 21 on the left side and 7 bilaterally. In 45 cases the operation was indicated because of congenital, in 12 cases due to posttraumatic incongruency and in 2 cases because of iatrogenic impingement after previously performed excessive ulnar shortening osteotomy. Modified Mayo-Wrist-Score, patient questioning, VAS and ROM were used to evaluate the results.

RESULTS

Significant reduction of pain on VAS from 7.22 to 1.98 (p < .001) was achieved. The pre- and postoperative range of motion did not show any significant changes (mean total arc of motion 301,94° vs. 295,20°, p = .300). Specific complications we observed included a too distally performed osteotomy, DRUJ instability, de Quervain´s tenosynovitis, persistent pain and conversion into an ulna-plus variance.

CONCLUSION

Under consideration of the indication criteria and correct execution of the osteotomy, in about 90 % of the cases this operation leads to good-to-excellent results with pain reduction and improvement of weight-bearing and power. The preoperative examination, verification of the DRUJ stability and the radiological diagnostics are crucial for a good outcome.

Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation of Functional Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction

Background  The Aptis distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) implant has been commonly used to replace the DRUJ and restore wrist function in patients with a severely destroyed DRUJ. Objective  Promising results have been described in the literature. However, the clinical results in a multicenter setting are sparse and variable. This study evaluates the short- to midterm clinical results of 53 patients with a (mean) follow-up of 51 months. Patients and Methods  Fifty-three patients (59 implants) treated between 2011 and 2020 in three different institutions were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected database. The main indication for Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty was a destroyed DRUJ and gross distal radioulnar instability and isolated DRUJ osteoarthritis. Functional outcome, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Patients completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire and an additional questionnaire about patient satisfaction and return to hobby/work. Results  Implant survival was 92%, the surgical follow-up showed many complications (64,4%), and revision surgery was needed frequently (40.7%). In 13 cases, the follow-up was longer than 5 years. Three reimplantations had to be performed and two implants were permanently explanted. In spite of this all, wrist and forearm motion as well as pain reduction was adequate and patient satisfaction was reasonable (72.2%). Conclusion  The Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty is a viable option that can provide adequate wrist and forearm function after secure patient selection and surgical placement of the implant in the wrist with a good bone stock of the radius. The complication rate was found to be high, yet patient satisfaction was reasonable. In the case of secondary surgery, additional surgery seems to be needed. For primary surgery, the implant seems to be successful without complications. Different complications have been described, but further analysis is warranted to find the causes of complications and to objectify the performance of the Aptis DRUJ implant. Level of Evidence  IV.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Osteoarthritis: An Update on Treatment Options

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), the articulation between the sigmoid notch of the radius and the distal ulna, plays a pivotal role in stability and load bearing and allows for pronation and supination of the forearm. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the DRUJ commonly occurs due to distal radius trauma but may also be the result of conditions such as joint instability, septic arthritis, or primary OA. It is initially managed with conservative therapy, but surgery is often considered when nonoperative methods fail. The surgical approaches available to treat this pathology have grown over the years. The procedures have generally favorable outcomes, each with their own unique complications and considerations. This paper comprises a review of the outcomes and complications for the different procedures commonly used to surgically treat DRUJ OA.

Bone Remodeling after Ulna Head Replacement in Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: A Radiographic Comparison between a Partial and a Total Ulna Head Concept

Background  Ulna head arthroplasty has become an eligible solution for injury or disease in the distal radioulnar joint. Bone resorption beneath the prosthetic head is often reported, but mechanism poorly understood. Purpose  The aims were to evaluate bone remodeling and radiological instability in two conceptually different distal radioulnar joint arthroplasties: the total and the partial ulna head replacement. Patients and Methods  We conducted a retrospective radiographic assessment of 51 ulna head arthroplasties; 26 Herbert ulna (total ulna head replacement) and 25 First Choice (partial ulna head replacement), to analyze periprosthetic bone resorption and radiologic instability. Intraoperative/immediate postoperative and 1-year radiographs were reviewed by two independent assessors. The radiographic follow-up averaged 13 (10-17) months. The size of the stem in relation to the diameter of the ulna (filling ratio) was measured on the intraoperative/immediate postoperative radiographs. Bone resorption beneath the collar of the prothesis was measured on the 1-year radiographs and expressed as a bone resorption index (BRI) between the length of the resorption and the length of the implant stem. Radiological stability was measured on both the preoperative and the 1-year lateral radiographs. Results  The total ulna head prothesis presented with more extensive bone resorption beneath the prosthetic head than the partial ulna head prothesis at 1-year post surgery ( p <0.001). The filling ratio did not influence the 1-year bone resorption and there was no difference regarding radiological instability between the two prosthetic designs. Conclusion  The pattern of bone adaptions after an ulna head prothesis may differ due to design and concept of the prosthesis.

[Operative Approaches to the distal radioulnar Joint and distal Ulna]

At the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and the ulnocarpal joint several anatomical structures are in a limited space. Therefore, the operative approach has to consider the pathology to be treated. The DRUJ may be approached from the dorsal or the palmar side. Procedures to treat the arthrotically destroyed DRUJ involving bone resection of the ulnar head and destabilizing ligamentous injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) are best approached from the dorsal side. This approach allows excellent visualization of the ulnar head and the ulnar and radial attachment of the TFCC. The arthroscopic, half open refixation of the ulnar avulsion of the TFCC may be performed using a variety of limited and small approaches over the dorsal or lateral ulnar head. Pathologies with an origin at the palmar aspect of the DRUJ as the palmar dislocation of the ulnar head in the DRUJ or the shrinkage and scaring of the palmar capsule with consecutive pronation contracture require a palmar approach. Reduction and osteosynthesis of fractures in the area of the ulnar head are preformed using a lateral approach along the styloid process and the ulnar head between the flexor and the extensor carpi ulnaris tendons. Along the ulnar shaft elective ulnar shortening osteotomy as well as fracture reduction and osteosynthesis are best performed from an ulno palmar approach.

3D analysis of the distal ulna with regard to the design of a new ulnar head prosthesis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, single center, data analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Persistent pain and instability are common complications after distal ulnar head arthroplasty. One main reason may be the insufficient representation of the anatomical structures with the prosthesis. Some anatomical structures are neglected such as the ulnar head offset and the ulnar torsion which consequently influences the wrist biomechanics.

METHODS

CT scans of the ulnae of forty healthy and asymptomatic patients were analyzed in a three-dimensional surface calculation program. In the best fit principle, cylinders were fitted into the medullary canal of the distal ulna and the ulnar head to determine their size. The distance between the central axes of the two cylinders was measured, which corresponds to the ulnar offset, and also their rotational orientation was measured, which corresponds to the ulnar torsion.

RESULTS

The mean medullary canal diameter was 5.8 mm (±0.8), and the ulnar head diameter was 15.8 mm (±1.5). The distance between the two cylinder axes was 3.89 mm (±0.78). The orientation of this offset was at an average of 8.63° (±15.28) of supination, reaching from 23° pronation to 32° supination.

CONCLUSION

With these findings, a novel ulnar head prosthesis should have different available stem and head sizes but also have an existing but variable offset between these two elements. A preoperative three-dimensional analysis is due to the high variation of offset orientation highly recommended. These findings might help to better represent the patients natural wrist anatomy in the case of an ulnar head arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Distal Radio-Ulnar Joint Reconstruction after failed Darrach operation using free autogenous second toe Metatarso-phalangeal joint transfer. Development of the technique and a long-term (over 25 year) follow-up

During the development of microvascular surgery in 1980-95 many new methods to overcome different traumatic disorders were studied. Previously unsolved problems could be treated using free tissue transfer. Typical problems in wrist surgery were the painful complications from ulna head resection. No sound or acceptable artificial protheses for ulna head were available. Author did study the possibilities of reversal of resected ulna head using an autogenous microvascular joint transfer. First it was done using cadaver models and evaluating the possibilities of a toe MTP-II joint in replacing the distal radio-ulnar joint. Then same principle was used in three clinical cases. All patients had suffered a poor result after ulna head resection or Darrach procedure. First two cases had complications but third case from year 1994 resulted in a good outcome. This paper introduces the development of a surgical technique for the replacement of the resected ulna head. Also, it will describe the excellent long-term result achieved in the last case with 26-year follow-up. Although today many sophisticated prosthetic replacement techniques have become developed for this purpose, this kind of autogenous reconstruction might have a place in treating similar problems in young posttraumatic patients. Also it demonstrates the potential benefit of microsurgery in a difficult wrist problem.

Effect of Ulnar Head Offset on Distal Radioulnar Joint Stability

PURPOSE

A complete ulnar head replacement may be indicated in cases of distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) dysfunction to address bony pathology in lieu of using a constrained total DRUJ prosthesis. Complete ulnar head implants are simple, but they may be unstable if soft tissue tension is not adequately restored. We hypothesized that incorporating an increased offset in the complete ulnar head replacement would lead to increased tension on the distal oblique interosseous ligament, increased contact force at the DRUJ, and improved joint stability.

METHODS

Using a specially designed jig, we measured instability by comparing displacement under load (stiffness) of the DRUJ in 10 cadaveric specimens under 4 different conditions: (1) intact, (2) native head after excision of the triangular fibrocartilage complex, (3) replacement of the ulnar head with a standard offset ulnar head, and (4) replacement of the ulnar head with an increased offset ulnar head. No soft tissue repair was done. We measured anteroposterior displacement under load with maximum translation of 10 mm or maximum loads of 50 N. We tested all specimens with the forearm positioned in neutral, supination, and pronation.

RESULTS

Excising the triangular fibrocartilage complex decreased the average stiffness of the DRUJ to 46% of the intact state, creating a simulated state of DRUJ instability. Replacing the ulnar head with the standard offset head increased average stiffness to 54% of the intact state. Increasing the ulnar head offset with the simulated total ulnar head replacement increased average stiffness to 77% of the intact state.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased offset ulnar head replacement improves DRUJ stability compared with a standard anatomic offset ulnar head replacement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding DRUJ morphology and offset is important in the treatment of DRUJ arthritis and instability.

Long-term results of Sauvé-Kapandji procedure

The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure is an established treatment option for distal radioulnar joint dysfunction. We retrospectively analysed 36 patients following Sauvé-Kapandji procedure between 1997 and 2013. Fifteen patients were available for a follow-up after a mean of 13 years (range 6 to 23). Six patients needed revision surgery because of ulnar stump instability. Radiographs and sonography were performed to quantify the instability of the proximal ulnar stump. These showed a radioulnar convergence of 8 mm without weight and 2 mm while lifting 1 kg. Sonographically, the proximal ulnar stump dislocated by 8 mm to the volar side while applying pressure to the palm, compared with 4 mm on the contralateral side. Sonographically measured ulnar stump instability showed a positive strong correlation with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluations and a negative strong correlation with grip strength and supination torque. Because of the high incidence of revision surgery due to instability of the proximal ulnar stump, we restrict the use of the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure only to very selected cases.Level of evidence: IV.

Ulnar Head or Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement, Isolated and Combined with Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Midterm Results

Purpose  Various implants have been described for ulnar head replacement (UHR) or for total replacement of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Many series are small and few reports on mid- or long-term results. This study is primarily aimed to report on the midterm results after ulnar head only and total DRUJ replacement using the uHead in the treatment of painful disorders of the DRUJ. The secondary aim of the study was to eventually assess the combination of UHR and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods  We included 20 consecutive patients in whom an UHR with the uHead was performed at our institution between February 2005 and March 2017. There were 6 men and 14 women with mean age of 59 years (range: 36-80 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range: 2-15 years). Data were recorded prospectively before operation and at follow-up examinations and entered in a registry. The patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and thereafter annually. In five cases, the uHead was implanted simultaneously with a Remotion TWA. In four cases, a Remotion TWA had been implanted previously. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of remaining free of revision. A nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for comparing data not normally distributed (qDASH [quick disabilities of the hand, shoulder, and arm] scores), and the paired parametric Student's t -test was used for normally distributed data (pain and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, range of motion, and grip strength). Significance was set at a p -value of less than 0.05. Results  Pain, grip strength, and the function improved significantly. Pain after surgery decreased with 50 points on the VAS score scale of 100, from 66 (mean), preoperatively (range: 16-97) to 16 (mean; range: 0-51), postoperatively, while grip strength nearly doubled from 12 KgF (mean; range: 4-22), before to 21 KgF (mean; range: 6-36), after the surgery. Patients function measured with qDASH scores improved from 56 (mean; range: 36-75), preoperatively to 19 (mean; range: 4-47), postoperatively. Wrist extension, flexion, and ulnar and radial deviation did not change to a clinically or statistically significant extend, neither did supination nor pronation improved after surgery. While three UHRs were revised early because of pain problems and/or unsatisfactory forearm rotation in two cases and infection in one, 17 had an uncomplicated postoperative course and these patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery at all the follow-ups. Due to limited number of cases, the calculation of significance in comparing combined cases with UHR only cases was abandoned. Conclusion  Ulnar head arthroplasty (uHead) showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength, and the function of the patients with a painful disability of the DRUJ, without impairment on mobility on the midterm follow-up. The overall implant survival over the time and the complication rate was acceptable.

Midterm Outcomes of the Use of a Spherical Ulnar Head Prosthesis for Failed Sauvé-Kapandji Procedures

PURPOSE

The use of a spherical ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) for the treatment of symptomatic radioulnar convergence after Sauvé-Kapandji (SK) procedure has shown promising results in the short term. This study aims to evaluate the midterm outcome of the original cohort of patients treated with this technique.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with unstable ulnar stumps confirmed both clinically and radiographically were studied. The etiology for the initial SK procedure included posttraumatic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) incongruity, primary DRUJ arthrosis, and dysplastic DRUJ. Fourteen of the 17 patients had a minimum of 2, and a maximum of 6, operations prior to having a spherical UHP. All patients suffered from severe pain with difficulty in performing work and daily activities. Ceramic UHP was used for all patients, except 2 in whom a cobalt chrome head was used.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 6 years (range, 4-17 years). A marked reduction in pain was observed with 11 patients reporting that they remained pain free. The range of motion of the wrist and power grip was maintained and showed a statistically significant improvement at the late follow-up. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score also significantly improved from 77 to 41. There were no signs of prosthetic loosening at the midterm follow-up. The 2 patients with cobalt chrome prostheses had pain and osteolysis requiring revision to total DRUJ prosthesis. Two patients with dorsal prosthetic subluxation were successfully treated with distal radial osteotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The midterm results of ceramic spherical UHP for failed SK procedures in this small patient series are encouraging.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Unipolar ulnar head replacement for treatment of post-Darrach procedure instability

The aim of this study was to assess distal radioulnar joint stability after unipolar ulnar head replacement for post-Darrach instability. All the patients who underwent ulnar head replacement between1999 and 2015 for post-Darrach procedure instability at our clinic were reviewed. Seven Hebert-type and two uHead (SBI/Stryker) prostheses were implanted. None of the implants were cemented. We assessed stability, pain, range of motion and strength pre- and postoperatively. The changes in the radiographic appearance between immediate postoperative and the last follow-up were determined. All patients (8 patients and 9 joint replacements) had a stable distal ulnar stump at the mean follow-up of 69 months. No complications occurred and no revisions were needed. Pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) was 0 at rest and 6 during maximum effort at the last follow-up; it was 1.5 at rest and 8.5 during effort preoperatively. Wrist flexion and extension, supination and grip strength were unchanged. Pronation increased from 45° to 70°. An area of bone resorption proximal to the ulnar head implant was found in 5 cases but no secondary displacement of the implant or increased pain was reported. Ulnar head replacement stabilizes the ulnar stump. The implant acts as a spacer to place the soft tissues under tension. Distal ulnar stump instability after the Darrach procedure can be solved by a unipolar ulnar head replacement procedure.

Salvage Procedures for Distal Radioulnar Joint Complications

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) allows forearm rotation and load transmission across the wrist. Post-traumatic and degenerative joint disease of DRUJ may cause pain and disability. Deficiency of the soft tissue or bony supports may result in DRUJ instability. Various techniques have been developed to address arthritis and / or instability of the DRUJ. A comprehensive review of the spectrum of surgical techniques and arthroplasty options is presented. The concepts of these procedures are discussed in detail, with a focus on special points of interest to optimise outcomes and to avoid complications. The salvage of the complications of arthroplasties is also presented in detail.

Ulnar Head Replacement: 21 Cases; Mean Follow-Up, 7.5 Years

PURPOSE

To report clinical and radiographic outcomes for the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis after a mean of 7.5 years (range, 2.0-12.5 years).

METHODS

We performed 22 Herbert ulnar head prosthesis arthroplasties between 2000 and 2011. Five were primary procedures, and the remaining 17 were done after an average of 2 (range, 1-5) previous operations. The mean age at surgery was 55 years (range, 31-74 years). Follow-up including clinical examination, standardized questionnaires, and radiographic examination was done after mean 7.5 years (range, 2.0-12.5 years) in 21 cases. We used the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire, and the Mayo wrist score questionnaire. Pain and satisfaction were evaluated with a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Measurements of range of motion and strength for grip were recorded.

RESULTS

Wrist range of motion was not affected by the arthroplasty except for supination, which significantly improved from 55° to 70°. At follow-up, grip strength averaged 25 kg (range, 10-48 kg) in the operated wrists and 31 kg (range, 8-74 kg) on the contralateral side. Visual analog scale-pain averaged 2.9 (range, 0-8.7) during activity and 1.7 (range, 0-7) at rest. Satisfaction VAS was 8.9 (range, 4.3-10). Five patients had VAS-pain above 5 during activity, and 1 patient was dissatisfied and regretted having undergone arthroplasty. Mean outcomes were 27 (range, 5-50) for Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand measure, 31 (range, 0-90) for the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, and 71 (range, 30-90) for the Mayo wrist score. One patient was reoperated with capsuloplasty 9 months after the arthroplasty owing to recurrence of painful instability. Full stability was not achieved but the pain resolved. None of the implants showed any radiographic signs of loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

The Herbert ulnar head prosthesis was a safe method of treatment and provided satisfactory midterm results for selected cases of distal radioulnar joint disorders.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Increased knowledge of performance for ulnar head implant arthroplasty may aid surgical decision making for distal radioulnar joint disorders.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Functional Outcomes of the Aptis-Scheker Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement in Patients Under 40 Years Old

PURPOSE

To study the functional results after Aptis-Scheker distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) replacement in young patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study selecting all patients under age 40 years, with a clinical and radiological follow-up longer than 2 years, who underwent DRUJ replacement. Patients' charts were reviewed and age at surgery, profession, hobbies, comorbidities, diagnosis, previous procedures, and complications were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores, visual analog scale score, grip strength, lifting capacity, and wrist range of motion were recorded. Functional results and characteristics of the patients were correlated with linear regression. A Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted.

RESULTS

We performed 46 arthroplasties. Average patient age was 32 years. Forty-one arthroplasties were performed for pain and 5 for pain and instability. Average follow-up was 61 months. Thirty-seven patients underwent multiple procedures before DRUJ replacement (1.7 ± 1.2 procedures). Extensor carpi ulnaris release with implant coverage using a local adipofascial flap (5) or dermal-fat graft (4) was the most common procedure performed after implantation of the prosthesis. Thirty surgeries were undertaken to address complications after DRUJ replacement in 15 wrists. A total of 36 procedures not related to DRUJ replacement were performed in 15 wrists after the arthroplasty. Grip, lifting, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores, visual analog scale score, and supination showed statistically significant improvement after surgery. Functional results were comparable in patients who received the implant with either a standard or extended stem. Patient age and number of the previous procedures did not correlate with functional results. The 5-year survival of the implant was 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of young patients, the implant improved the functional status of the extremity. The most frequent complication was extensor carpi ulnaris tendonitis, which was addressed by interposition of an adipofascial flap.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Intermediate outcomes of ulnar head arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the survivorship and clinical outcomes of ulnar head arthroplasty.

METHODS

The study design included a review of medical records and clinical assessment of all patients who had an ulnar head arthroplasty more than 2 years previously. Survivorship of 79 implants in 74 patients was determined. Forty-seven of these patients participated in a clinical review using the Patient Examination Measure, Patient-Related Wrist Examination, Wrightington Wrist Score, and EQ5D to measure outcomes. Analysis of outcomes was performed for diagnostic subgroups (inflammatory arthritis, posttraumatic, osteoarthritis/impingement, and other), primary versus revision surgery, and whether the procedure was performed for ulnar stump instability (related to either a previous Darrach or Sauvé-Kapandji procedure).

RESULTS

The 5- and 15-year survival of the implants was 90% for both, with mean follow-up of 7 ± 4 years. Mean age at surgery was 50 ± 13 years (range, 24-76). Mean range of motion was within the functional range and grip strength was 67% that of the contralateral side. Patient satisfaction was generally high, but outcomes scores indicated substantial residual disability. Overall scores were 41 for the Patient Examination Measure, 52 for the Patient-Related Wrist Examination, and 70 for the WWS. Patients in the "other" category had the worst scores for all measures. Patients with prior wrist surgery had poorer outcomes than those for whom the arthroplasty was a primary procedure. Patients with posttraumatic diagnoses had worse EQ5D scores and were less likely to recommend the procedure to others.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar head arthroplasty had good long-term survival and acceptable patient satisfaction. Substantial disability remained in all groups, with the posttraumatic, "other", and revision groups faring worse. Patients should be counseled about the expected outcomes of this specialized procedure as they pertain to the patient's specific situation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Instability of the distal radioulnar joint

The distal radioulnar joint is a complex structure necessary for forearm motion and force transmission across the wrist. Anatomic and biomechanical advances have revealed broad contributions to distal radioulnar joint stability and refined our understanding of the forces acting across it. Instability often co-occurs with other modes of pathology, such as arthrosis or malunion; and appropriate diagnosis and treatment require a comprehensive understanding of all contributing factors. Distal radioulnar joint instability can be broadly categorized as primary, post-traumatic or post-surgical. Treatment strategies include percutaneous, arthroscopic, soft-tissue, osteotomy and arthroplasty techniques. The purpose of this article is to review distal radioulnar joint instability and its management.

Objective outcomes following semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty

A dysfunctional distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) can significantly compromise an individual's forearm rotation, grip, and weight bearing at the hand and wrist. This retrospective study reports surgeon- and therapist-collected objective wrist function and subjective pain scores of 10 patients who received the Scheker total DRUJ prosthesis. A review of these patients' medical records was performed to collect preoperative measurements of wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and pain scores (0-10 scale). The degree of pronation, supination, flexion, extension, radial deviation, and ulnar deviation were the outcome measures used to evaluate wrist ROM. Postoperative measurements were collected at a follow up of 5 ± 1.1 years in our clinic (minimum follow-up of 2yrs). Mean final wrist flexion and extension were 32.1 ± 22.8° and 44.8 ± 13.9°, respectively. Mean final supination and pronation were 72.5 ± 14.4° and 69.5 ± 14.6°, respectively. Average grip strength was 54.9 ± 23.7 lbs. The mean pain score was 3.6 ± 3.1. Although there were no statistically significant changes in any of these outcome measures, the Scheker prosthesis improved wrist ROM (with the exception of wrist flexion) and decreased pain. Grip strength decreased by less than 1 lb but was still higher than the postoperative grip strength measurements in the literature for this prosthesis. Because of the self-stabilizing nature of this prosthesis and the satisfactory functional outcomes from this study and other studies, the Scheker prosthesis is still a viable option for DRUJ pathology that is refractory to nonimplant arthroplasties. This is a therapeutic level IV study.

Functional anatomy of the distal radioulnar joint in health and disease

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is critical to the function of the forearm as a mechanical unit. This paper is concerned with the concepts and observations that have changed understanding of the function of the DRUJ, notably with respect to the biomechanics of this joint. The DRUJ has been shown to be important in acting to distribute load and removal of the ulna head leads to the biomechanical equivalent of a one-bone forearm. The soft tissues with topographical relations to the distal forearm and DRUJ have also been investigated in our experimental series with findings including the description of a clinical disorder termed subluxation-related ulna neuropathy syndrome.

Resection interposition arthroplasty for failed distal ulna resections

The major complications of distal ulna resection, the Darrach procedure, are radioulnar impingement and instability. High failure rates have been reported despite published modifications of the Darrach procedure. Several surgical techniques have been developed to treat this difficult problem and to mitigate the symptoms associated with painful convergence and impingement. No technique has demonstrated clinical superiority. Recently, implant arthroplasty of the distal ulna has been endorsed as an option for the management of the symptomatic patient with a failed distal ulna resection. However, there are concerns for implant longevity, especially in young, active adults. Resection interposition arthroplasty relies on interposition of an Achilles tendon allograft between the distal radius and the resected distal ulna. Although this technique does not restore normal mechanics of the distal radioulnar joint, it can prevent painful convergence of the radius on the ulna. Achilles allograft interposition arthroplasty is a safe and highly effective alternative for failed distal ulna resections, especially for young, active patients, in whom an implant or alternative procedure may not be appropriate.

Rehabilitation following thumb CMC, radiocarpal, and DRUJ arthroplasty

Hand therapy is essential after arthroplasty around the wrist. This article includes therapy guidelines and goals after surgical reconstruction of the thumb carpometacarpal joint, radiocarpal joint, and distal radioulnar joint. Typical concerns and treatment options are addressed. Tables and figures are included to guide the hand therapist in the process of returning this patient population to pain-free function.

Preliminary experience with a new total distal radioulnar joint replacement

This study reports the intermediate-term results of four patients from a series eight patients who have had an insertion of a new complete distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) prosthesis. A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent DRUJ joint replacement with the STABILITY Sigmoid Notch Total DRUJ System between the years of 2003 and 2008. To be included in this report, all patients had to have more than 24 months of follow-up and hand examination by the senior author. From the eight patients with this procedure, four patients met the inclusion criteria. These included one patient with painful posttraumatic arthritis, two patients with failed hemiarthroplasty, and one patient with a failed Sauvé-Kapandji procedure. Mean age at the time of surgery was 42.5 years (range: 35 to 51 years) and mean follow-up was 46 months (range: 36 to 66 months). Preoperative and postoperative assessment included range of motion, grip strength, visual analog pain scale, patient satisfaction, and radiographic evaluation. There was a successful replacement of the DRUJ in all four patients. Final range of motion showed mean pronation of 80 degrees (range: 60 to 90 degrees) and mean supination of 64 degrees (range: 45 to 90 degrees). Final grip strength on the operated extremity was 25.5 kg and averaged 73% of contralateral side. This was an improvement from preoperative grip strength of 14.5 kg visual analog pain scale decreased from 8 to 2.5 following surgery (scale: 1 to 10). Patient satisfaction was 100%. One patient returned to manual labor, one patient returned to office work, and two patients remained off work. Postoperative radiographs depict appropriate alignment of the DRUJ, and there have been no cases of subluxation or dislocation. Implant survival has been 100%. Total DRUJ joint replacement with sigmoid notch resurfacing and distal ulna replacement is an alternative to ulnar head resection in cases of DRUJ arthritis. Total DRUJ arthroplasty with this resurfacing design may provide a means of decreasing pain and restoring DRUJ stability and motion following severe trauma, failed hemiarthroplasty, or failed Sauvé-Kapandji procedure. More experience is needed with this implant to confirm these initial encouraging results. The level of evidence for this study is IV (therapeutic, case series).

Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using an ulnar head prosthesis: long-term results

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis for painful instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) following resection of the ulnar head.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients were treated with a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis in 3 international hand centers. One patient was excluded from the study because a septic prosthesis had to be removed after 3 months. Sixteen of the remaining 22 patients could be assessed at 2 follow-up times, 28 months (range, 10-43 mo) and 11 years and 2 months (range, 97-158 mo) after surgery, for DRUJ stability, forearm rotation, grip strength, pain level (0-10), and satisfaction (0-10). Standardized radiographs of the wrist were evaluated for displacement of the ulnar head and loosening or bony reactions at the sigmoid notch or the ulna shaft.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated a clinically stable DRUJ at the latest examination, and no patient required further surgery at the DRUJ since the short-term evaluation in 1999. Average pain measured 3.7 before surgery, 1.7 at the short-term follow-up, and 1.7 at the long-term follow-up; patients' satisfaction, 2.2, 8.2, and 8.9; pronation, 73°, 86°, and 83°; supination, 52°, 77°, and 81°; and grip strength, 42%, 72%, and 81% of the unaffected side. All clinical parameters improved significantly from before surgery to the short-term follow-up, with no further statistically significant change between the short-term and long-term follow-up. Radiographs demonstrated no signs of stem loosening or incongruity of the DRUJ.

CONCLUSIONS

The previously reported short-term results with the Herbert prosthesis did not deteriorate in the long term. Reconstruction of the DRUJ with this prosthesis in painful radioulnar impingement following ulnar head resection is a reliable and reproducible procedure with lasting results.

Clinical and non-clinical aspects of distal radioulnar joint instability

Untreated distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) injuries can give rise to long lasting complaints. Although common, diagnosis and treatment of DRUJ injuries remains a challenge. The articulating anatomy of the distal radius and ulna, among others, enables an extensive range of forearm pronosupination movements. Stabilization of this joint is provided by both intrinsic and extrinsic stabilizers and the joint capsule. These structures transmit the load and prevent the DRUJ from luxation during movement. Several clinical tests have been suggested to determine static or dynamic DRUJ stability, but their predictive value is unclear. Radiologic evaluation of DRUJ instability begins with conventional radiographs in anterioposterior and true lateral view. If not conclusive, CT-scan seems to be the best additional modality to evaluate the osseous structures. MRI has proven to be more sensitive and specific for TFCC tears, potentially causing DRUJ instability. DRUJ instability may remain asymptomatic. Symptomatic DRUJ injuries treatment can be conservative or operative. Operative treatment should consist of restoration of osseous and ligamenteous anatomy. If not successful, salvage procedures can be performed to regain stability.

SALVAGE OF A FAILED SAUVÉ-KAPANDJI PROCEDURE USING A TOTAL DISTAL RADIO-ULNAR JOINT REPLACEMENT

This is the first report in the literature of a patient treated with a DRUJ replacement after Sauvé-Kapandji procedure failed due to pain and instability. The DRUJ replacement is an unconstrained, biomechanically more advantageous implant which can confer stability in cases where soft tissues are inadequate. We describe the treatment and outcome of persistent ulnar instability with a distal radio-ulnar joint replacement following failed salvage procedures for a malunion of a distal radius fracture.

Bone stresses before and after insertion of two commercially available distal ulnar implants using finite element analysis

Distal ulnar arthroplasty is becoming a popular treatment option for disorders of the distal radioulnar joint; however, few studies have investigated how load transfer in the ulna is altered after insertion of an implant. The purpose of our study was to compare bone stresses before and after insertion of two commercially available cemented distal ulnar implants: an implant with a titanium stem and an implant with a cobalt chrome stem. Appropriately sized implants of both types were inserted into eight previously validated subject-specific finite element models, which were created by using information derived from computed tomography scans. The von Mises stresses were compared at eight different regions pre- and post-implantation. The bone stresses with the titanium stem were consistently closer to the pre-implantation stresses than with the cobalt chrome stem. For the loading situation and parameters investigated, results of these models show that insertion of the E-Centrix® ulnar Head may result in less stress shielding than the SBI uHead™ stem. Future studies are required to investigate other implant design parameters and loading conditions that may affect the predicted amount of stress shielding.

Treatment of post-traumatic degenerative changes of the radio-carpal and distal radio-ulnar joints by combining radius, scaphoid, and lunate (RSL) fusion with ulnar head replacement

Distal radial fractures are a common type of fracture. In the case of intra-articular fractures, they often result in post-traumatic arthrosis. The objective of this study is to describe a novel alternative to the established salvage techniques for the treatment of post-traumatic arthrosis of the radio-carpal and distal radio-ulnar joints (DRUJ). Six patients with radio-carpal and DRUJ arthrosis were treated with a combined radius, scaphoid, and lunate (RSL) arthrodesis and as a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis. Follow-up consisted of both radiographic and functional assessments. Functional measurements were noted both pre- and postoperatively. No non-union or pseudoarthrosis was seen; neither did any of the ulnar head prostheses show loosening. Clinical examination showed an improvement in strength, pain, and range of movement, as well as a decrease in disability. Combining RSL arthrodesis with a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis, which deals with pain while retaining partial wrist movement, can be an alternative to established salvage procedures.

Allograft tendon interposition and brachioradialis tendon stability augmentation in revision surgery for failed Darrach distal ulna resections

Achilles allograft interposition is one treatment alternative for failed Darrach distal ulna resections, good results have been reported with its use but concern remains with the stability of the distal ulnar stump. The use of brachioradialis tendon passed through the radius and then divided in to 2 branches to pass over the volar and dorsal aspect of the ulnar stump with the Achilles tendon interposition, seems to represent a more reliable, secure, and biological way of restoring palmar and dorsal stability to the distal ulnar stump; while it allows a better control of the tension given to the Achilles allograft interposed than that achieved when using only suture anchors as described in the original technique.

Salvage of failed distal radioulnar joint reconstruction

In the patient in whom primary distal radioulnar joint surgery has failed, consideration must be given to the anatomy and biomechanics of the native joint; how this has been disrupted by injury, disease, and previous trauma; and what is required to reconstruct the joint. The forearm relies on a congruent condylar cam of the distal ulna, with intact soft tissue restraints for normal biomechanics. Surgical reconstruction using tendon graft, autologous bone graft, allograft interposition, and prosthetic reconstruction are discussed in this article. If these procedures fail, then salvage procedures including wide excision of the ulna or one-bone forearm can be performed.

A new total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis: functional outcome

PURPOSE

To present the evolution of design and the short-term functional outcome of our distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) prosthesis. This total DRUJ prosthesis differs from others in that it consists of 2 parts and attains bony fixation by its hydroxyapatite coating.

METHODS

Nineteen patients received a DRUJ prosthesis after a failed Darrach procedure (n = 10), Sauvé-Kapandji procedure (n = 7), trauma (n = 1), or DRUJ synovitis (n = 1). Indications for the placement were decreased grip, decreased forearm motion, and pain due to ulnar impingement syndrome and instability of the distal ulna. Seven prostheses were removed, 5 due to loosening, 1 due to continuing pain, and 1 at the request of the patient. The 5 prostheses that loosened were an intermediate prototype no longer in use. In 12 remaining cases, range of motion, grip strength, and pinch strength were measured, and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Pain was assessed with the visual analog scale (range, 0-10). A paired t-test was performed to assess the significance of the difference between preoperative and postoperative measurements.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements were seen in forearm pronation, from an average of 79° to 88°; grip strength, from an average of 10 kg to an average of 16 kg; and visual analog scale score, decreased from a mean of 5.3 to a mean of 3.5. The distal ulna was clinically stable in all 12 patients who retained the prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The intermediate prototype had a high failure rate, 5 out of 5. The early results for the current prosthesis prototype show clinical improvement. Based on these results, we conclude that this prosthesis offers a new treatment option for ulnar instability after distal ulnar resection.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The functional anatomy of forearm rotation

The elbow, forearm and wrist act as a unified structure to provide a stable, strong and highly mobile strut for positioning the hand in space and for conducting load-bearing tasks. An understanding of the relevant anatomy and biomechanics is important for the surgeon assessing and treating disorders of forearm function. This paper is concerned with illuminating the principles and concepts governing forearm rotation and load-bearing functions.

Ulnar head implant arthroplasty: an intermediate term review of 1 surgeon's experience

Ulnar head arthroplasty has been an emerging alternative for salvage of resection arthroplasty at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) since the early 1990s. Recently, it has been offered for initially treating painful arthrosis or instability of the DRUJ. This follow-up study reports a surgeon's experience treating DRUJ disorders with ulnar head arthroplasty. Twenty-two wrists in 20 patients (11 females, 9 males), 6 with no prior wrist procedures were treated between 1995 and 2006 for painful DRUJ disorders with either Herbert-Martin (Martin Medizin-Technik, Tuttingen, Germany) or Avanta (Small Bone Innovations, New York, NY) head prosthesis. Follow-up averaged 54.3 months. A standardized telephone survey determined preoperative /postoperative verbal analog pain scores and a modified Mayo Wrist Score (delineating poor, fair, good, or excellent outcomes). Data suggest that ulnar head implant arthroplasty is a reasonable treatment option for DRUJ-related pain, loss of function, or salvage of failed distal ulna resection procedures. The analog pain score statistically significant decreased by 1.68 points when comparing preoperative to postoperative scores. Average Modified Mayo Wrist Scores were good, independent of whether the procedure was primary or salvaged. No significant difference was seen between the primary or salvage group modified Mayo Wrist Scores. Whereas averaged modified Mayo scores for both the primary and salvage groups were in the good category, prostheses used as primary procedures may be associated with fewer poor or fair outcomes. Two good and 1 excellent outcome of 3 wrists requiring revision procedures suggest that even with revision of the implant arthroplasty, satisfactory results may be expected.

Reconstruction of the distal ulna: instability, impaction, impingement, and arthrosis

A number of afflictions may affect the distal radioulnar joint that can lead to severe pain, disuse, dysfunction, and disability. The disorders that affect this small anatomic region are complex, have multifactorial etiologies, and can sometimes present difficult diagnostic and treatment options. This article presents an overview of recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of conditions that affect the joint and surrounding bone and soft tissues.

Achilles allograft interposition for failed Darrach distal ulna resections

Many treatment options exist for the symptomatic patient with a failed Darrach distal ulna resection. Tendon transfers, osteoplasties, soft tissue interpositions, and combinations have been used to mitigate the symptoms of impingement. Recently, implant arthroplasty of the distal ulna has become a favorable option for treating the patient with a symptomatic distal ulna resection. This article presents an alternative treatment option using Achilles tendon allograft as a soft tissue interposition.