Effects of Prone Position on Lung Recruitment and Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Combined CT Scan/Electrical Impedance Tomography Study

Innovative use of EIT-guided prone positioning and inhaled nitric oxide therapy for refractory hypoxemia in primary graft dysfunction: a case report

Primary graft dysfunction Grade 3 (PGD 3) following lung transplantation significantly increases the incidence of acute and chronic complications. These effects complicate clinical perioperative management and significantly increase mortality. Here, we report a case of PGD 3 and refractory hypoxemia after bilateral lung transplantation at our center. Despite ongoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, the patient's partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) remained suboptimal at 71.7 mmHg on postoperative day 4, precluding safe discontinuation of ECMO support. Consequently, EIT-guided interventions-including prone positioning optimization and inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy-were implemented to improve oxygenation. After undergoing a rigorous treatment process, the patient was successfully weaned off ECMO on the 10th day and transitioned out of the intensive care unit (ICU) on the 24th postoperative day. The combination of prone positioning and iNO therapy, tailored through EIT-guided interventions, provided an innovative approach to post-lung transplant management and had the potential to save patients' lives.

A nomogram model based on clinical and 3D-EIT parameters for CTEPH diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is easily misdiagnosed. Three-dimensional (3D) electrical impedance tomography (EIT) can monitor the whole-lung perfusion at the bedside. In this study, three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography (3D-EIT) features in patients with suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) was investigated, and nomogram models based on clinical and 3D-EIT parameters were constructed to identify CTEPH.

METHODS

Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to left heart disease and chronic hypoxia were excluded. The enrolled patients were divided into CTEPH and Non-CTEPH groups by confirmatory tests. Then, history and laboratory results were collected and 3D-EIT examination was performed. Out of 70 enrolled patients, 50 cases were used as the training set to construct the nomogram model. Obtained nomogram diagnostic model was calibrated and then evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves (CIC).

RESULTS

Through a comprehensive univariate analysis, Wald test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the nomogram model for CTEPH diagnosis based on 50 patients was constructed using venous thromboembolism (VTE) history, D-dimer, maximum of corresponding regional ventilation/perfusion ratio (V/Qmax), range between the maximum and minimum values of regional perfusion (P-Range) and the percentage of ventilation/perfusion match area (VQMatch). The C-index of the nomogram model in the training set was 0.926 (95% CI: 0.859-0.993). In the training set and test set, the nomogram model had a larger area under the curve (AUC) than models containing only VTE history, VTE history + D-dimer and EIT parameters. Both DCA and CIC analyses indicate that this model can provide significant clinical benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram model combining clinical and 3D-EIT parameters facilitated the diagnosis of CTEPH.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

The Effect of Prone Position on Right Ventricular Functions in CARDS: Is Survival Predictable when Evaluated Through Transesophageal Echocardiography?

Objective

To evaluate the cardiopulmonary effect during prone position (PP) on right ventricular (RV) recovery in coronavirus disease-2019 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) through transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

Methods

This prospective study included 30 moderate-to-severe C-ARDS patients who were treated with PP in the first 48 h of invasive mechanical ventilation support. It was evaluated with TEE three times: before PP (T0f), the first hour of PP (T1), and the first hour of returning to the supine position (T0 + 24 h) (T2) after 23 hours of PP treatment. RV end-diastolic area/left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and LV end-systolic eccentricity index were preferred RV evaluations as primary outcomes. Pulmonary effects of PP were evaluated as a secondary outcome, including PaO2/FiO2, driving pressure (dP), static compliance (Cstat), mechanical ventilation parameters, and their association with 28-day survival. Tissue DO2 was examined as a secondary outcome, and it was calculated using the measured cardiac output through TEE.

Results

With the cardiopulmonary effect of PP, the decrease in RVEDA/LVEDA, the increase in TAPSE, PaO2/FiO2, and Cstat, and the decrease in dP were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Cstat value associated with 28-day survival showed decreased mortality for each unit increase. The Cstat cut-off value, which was statistically significant for survival, was 37.

Conclusion

PP can improve RV recovery and oxygenation, but it isn't always accompanied by increased survival. An increase in the Cstat may improve survival without the development of RV dysfunction while maintaining heart-lung interaction.

Influence of Prone Position on Regional Ventilation/Perfusion Matching in Patients With ARDS Over Time: A Prospective Physiological Study

Background: We sought to investigate the short- and long-term effects of prone positioning (PP) on ventilation/perfusion matching in patients with ARDS using contrast-enhanced electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Methods: EIT measurements were performed in 18 mechanically ventilated subjects with ARDS before PP (supine position [SP]), 1 h after turning subjects to PP (PP1), 3 h after PP (PP3), 9 h after (PP9), 16 h after PP (PP16; the end of PP), and 3 h after returning to the supine position (Re-SP3). Results: The P a O 2 /F I O 2 increased gradually during the PP period (110.68 vs 158.44 vs 210.15 vs 215.22 vs 236.04 vs 163.77 mm Hg, mean values at SP, PP1, PP3, PP9, PP16, and Re-SP3, respectively, P < .001). Global ventilation/perfusion matched percent significantly increased within PP duration (54.13% vs 63.15% vs 63.02% vs 63.75% vs 66.63% vs 57.42, P < .005). Compared with SP, dorsal ventilation significantly increased at PP1 (P < .001) and increased gradually during PP. However, the dorsal flow commenced to improve at PP9 and persisted in enhancement until PP16 (40.61% vs 48.78% vs 50.56%, mean values at PP3, PP9, and PP16, respectively, P < .05). There was a significant reduction in global Shunt-EIT percentage within PP duration, primarily localized in the dorsal area. Dead Space-EIT percentage remained unchanged during PP. Conclusions: Oxygenation remained improved or maintained throughout the 16-h duration of PP. Ventilation is susceptible to immediate gravitational effects; however, changes in blood flow may occur later after 9 h, which supports prolonged PP treatment. The shunt continuously decreases, but no significant changes were observed for dead space. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04725227. Registered on January 25, 2021.

Effect of prone position on ventilation-perfusion matching in patients with moderate to severe ARDS with different clinical phenotypes

BACKGROUND

ARDS is a heterogeneous syndrome involving different subphenotypes with different clinical features and different responses to treatment strategies. The prone position (PP) is an effective treatment for ARDS; however, whether the effects of prone positioning vary among ARDS patients with different subphenotypes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluated the impact of PP on ventilation-perfusion matching(VQ matching) by contrast-enhanced Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in ARDS patients with different subphenotypes.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study at the medical ICU of Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University. ARDS patients undergoing mechanical ventilation were screened and allocated to different subphenotypes based on lung morphology (focal/non-focal) and D-dimer level (low/high D-dimer). EIT was used in the supine position and 3 h, 6 h, and 12 h after the PP during the first PP session.

RESULTS

From July 1, 2021, to July 1, 2022, 25 patients were included in this study. 10 patients (40%) were focal ARDS, and 15 were non-focal ARDS based on baseline morphology. 12 patients (48%) were high D-dimer ARDS, and 13 were low D-dimer ARDS based on baseline D-dimer levels. PaO2/FiO2 increased significantly 3 h after prone positioning in focal ARDS patients (130.30[109.94-147.30] vs. 213.50[176.00-256.50] mmHg, p < 0.001), while the effect of improved oxygenation was not apparent until 6 h after prone positioning in non-focal ARDS patients (104.60[95.20-127.00] vs. 190.20[160.10-213.20] mm Hg, p < 0.001). VQ matching improved after 3 h in the prone position in the focal ARDS group (69.93 ± 6.69 vs. 78.22 ± 5.07, p = 0.006) but improved after only 6 h in the prone position in the non-focal ARDS group (67.32 ± 4.78 vs. 78.70 ± 5.93, p < 0.001). In ARDS patients with varying levels of D-dimer, increased PaO2/FiO2 (126.60[99.30-146.20] vs. 185.20[112.10-236.00] mmHg, p = 0.013) and improved VQ matching (67.60 ± 4.60 vs. 72.97 ± 6.48, p = 0.023) were observed at 3 h in the PP in patients with low D-dimer ARDS. In contrast, increased PaO2/FiO2(105.20[95.20-124.10] vs. 195.2[183.20-213.20], p < 0.001) and improved VQ matching (67.19 ± 6.70 vs. 72.50 ± 6.37, p < 0.001) were revealed only after 6 h in the prone position in high D-dimer ARDS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For moderate to severe ARDS patients, non-focal and high D-dimer ARDS patients need longer PP to improve oxygenation and VQmatching than the focal and low D-dimer patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This was a prospective, observational study registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055442, https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ), on June 30, 2021.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): from mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome of acute hypoxic respiratory failure caused by diffuse lung inflammation and edema. ARDS can be precipitated by intrapulmonary factors or extrapulmonary factors, which can lead to severe hypoxemia. Patients suffering from ARDS have high mortality rates, including a 28-day mortality rate of 34.8% and an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 40.0%. The pathophysiology of ARDS is complex and involves the activation and dysregulation of multiple overlapping and interacting pathways of systemic inflammation and coagulation, including the respiratory system, circulatory system, and immune system. In general, the treatment of inflammatory injuries is a coordinated process that involves the downregulation of proinflammatory pathways and the upregulation of anti-inflammatory pathways. Given the complexity of the underlying disease, treatment needs to be tailored to the problem. Hence, we discuss the pathogenesis and treatment methods of affected organs, including 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia, drowning, trauma, blood transfusion, severe acute pancreatitis, and sepsis. This review is intended to provide a new perspective concerning ARDS and offer novel insight into future therapeutic interventions.

Monitoring response to prone positioning

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increasing use of prone position, in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome as well as in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure receiving noninvasive respiratory support, mandates a better definition and monitoring of the response to the manoeuvre. This review will first discuss the definition of the response to prone positioning, which is still largely based on its effect on oxygenation. We will then address monitoring respiratory and hemodynamic responses to prone positioning in intubated patients. Finally, we will also discuss monitoring inspiratory effort in nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who breathe spontaneously and receive noninvasive respiratory support.

RECENT FINDINGS

The response to prone positioning should be enriched by data pertaining to lung protection beyond oxygenation. These include trans-pulmonary pressure, driving pressure, mechanical power, distribution of aeration and ventilation and assessment of potential for lung recruitment before the pronation.

SUMMARY

The implications of present findings are to: better select those patients who will benefit from proning in physiological terms, better indicate the timing of onset and end of the sessions, and strengthen the relationship between physiological response and patient outcome.

Pathophysiological Markers of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Severity Are Correlated With Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch Measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is associated with the outcome of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to verify the correlation between relevant pathophysiological markers of ARDS severity and V/Q mismatch.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

General ICU of a university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Deeply sedated intubated adult patients with ARDS under controlled mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

Measures of V/Q mismatch by EIT, respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, lung imaging, and plasma biomarkers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Unmatched V/Q units were assessed by EIT as the fraction of ventilated nonperfused plus perfused nonventilated lung units. At the same time, plasma biomarkers with proven prognostic and mechanistic significance for ARDS (carbonic anhydrase 9 [CA9], hypoxia-inducible factor 1 [HIF1], receptor for advanced glycation endproducts [RAGE], angiopoietin 2 [ANG2], gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and quantitative chest CT scans were measured. Twenty-five intubated ARDS patients were included with median unmatched V/Q units of 37.1% (29.2-49.2%). Unmatched V/Q units were correlated with plasma levels of CA9 (rho = 0.47; p = 0.01), HIF1 (rho = 0.40; p = 0.05), RAGE (rho = 0.46; p = 0.02), and ANG2 (rho = 0.42; p = 0.03). Additionally, unmatched V/Q units correlated with plateau pressure ( r = 0.38; p = 0.05) and with the number of quadrants involved on chest radiograph ( r = 0.73; p < 0.01). Regional unmatched V/Q units were correlated with the corresponding fraction of poorly aerated lung tissue ( r = 0.62; p = 0.01) and of lung tissue weight (rho: 0.51; p = 0.04) measured by CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

In ARDS patients, unmatched V/Q units are correlated with pathophysiological markers of lung epithelial and endothelial dysfunction, increased lung stress, and lung edema. Unmatched V/Q units could represent a comprehensive marker of ARDS severity, reflecting the complex organ pathophysiology and reinforcing their prognostic significance.

Effects of innovative modular prone positioning tools in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 during awake prone position: a prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Our aim is to investigate the effects of a innovative modular prone positioning tools on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19 during awake prone positioning (AW-PP).

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled study initially enrolled 168 patients with COVID-19 due to ARDS. However, 92 were subsequently disqualified, leaving 76 patients who were randomly assigned to either the observation group (n = 38) or the control group (n = 38). The observation group utilized innovative modular prone positioning tools for non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS), while the control group used soft pillows for the same treatment. Data were collected on comfort levels, adverse events, and efficacy indicators. Additionally, the comfort, incidence of adverse events, and treatment efficacy in both groups were evaluated.

RESULTS

The observation group had shorter the daily duration spent on executing the AW-PP (2.74 ± 0.86 min vs. 4.64 ± 1.02 min, P < 0.001), longer the daily total AW-PP (8.52 ± 1.01 h vs. 6.03 ± 0.66 h, P < 0.001), longer the daily duration until the first position adjustment (59.89 ± 12.73 min vs. 36.57 ± 8.69 min, P < 0.001), and lower the daily frequency of position adjustments during the AW-PP (11.03 ± 2.67 vs. 17.95 ± 2.58, P < 0.001) in comparison with the control group. No significant differences were observed in intubation rates, mortality, the daily number of hours under HFNO and NIV, escalated to NIV from HFNO, and hospital length of stay between the groups (P > 0.05). However, the observation group experienced significantly fewer adverse events, including kinking NIRS circuit, pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, and pressure ulcers (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Innovative modular prone positioning tools improved efficiency, comfort, and reduced adverse events during AW-PP but did not affect intubation rates or mortality.

Physiologic effects of prone positioning on gas exchange and ventilation-perfusion matching in awake patients with AHRF

BACKGROUND

Prone positioning (PP) improves oxygenation in awake patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear in patients with diverse lung morphology. We aimed to determine the short-term effects of awake prone positioning (APP) in AHRF patients with focal and non-focal lung morphology.

METHODS

This is a prospective physiological study. Twenty-four non-intubated patients with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg were included. Gas exchange, ventilation and perfusion distribution, and hemodynamics variables were recorded in the supine position (SP1), 2 h after PP, and 1 h after re-supine (SP2). Lung morphology was classified as focal and non-focal patterns using computed tomography.

RESULTS

Twelve of the included patients were classified to the focal group and 12 to the non-focal group. PaO2/FiO2 improved after PP in all patients (161 [137, 227] mmHg vs. 236 [202, 275] mmHg, p < 0.001). Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching increased after PP in all patients (61.9 [53.9, 66.5] vs. 77.5 [68.3, 80.0], p < 0.001). Shunt exhibited a significant decrease in patients of the non-focal group (28.6 [22.5, 30.3] vs. 11.3 [9.0, 14.5], p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found in the focal group after PP. Dead space decreased significantly in patients of the focal group (25.6 [21.5, 28.4] vs. 12.0 [10.8, 14.1], p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found in the non-focal group after PP.

CONCLUSIONS

APP improves V/Q matching, and large-scale, bias-free studies are needed to find more definitive differences between patients with focal and non-focal lung morphyology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (trial No. NCT04754113, date of registration: 2021-02-15).

Effect of Extended Prone Positioning in Intubated COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202390072.

Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS

BACKGROUND

The use of prone position (PP) has been widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas it has demonstrated benefits, including improved oxygenation and lung aeration, the factors influencing the response in terms of gas exchange to PP remain unclear. In particular, the association between baseline quantitative computed tomography (CT) scan results and gas exchange response to PP in invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS is unknown. The present study aimed to compare baseline quantitative CT results between subjects responding to PP in terms of oxygenation or CO2 clearance and those who did not.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective observational study including critically ill, invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to the ICUs of Niguarda Hospital between March 2020-November 2021. Blood gas samples were collected before and after PP. Subjects in whom the PaO2 /FIO2 increase was ≥ 20 mm Hg after PP were defined as oxygen responders. CO2 responders were defined when the ventilatory ratio (VR) decreased during PP. Automated quantitative CT analyses were performed to obtain tissue mass and density of the lungs.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled, of which 116 (93%) were O2 responders and 51 (41%) CO2 responders. No difference in quantitative CT characteristics and oxygen were observed between responders and non-responders (tissue mass 1,532 ± 396 g vs 1,654 ± 304 g, P = .28; density -544 ± 109 HU vs -562 ± 58 HU P = .42). Similar findings were observed when dividing the population according to CO2 response (tissue mass 1,551 ± 412 g vs 1,534 ± 377 g, P = .89; density -545 ± 123 HU vs -546 ± 94 HU, P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

Most subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS improved their oxygenation at the first pronation cycle. The study suggests that baseline quantitative CT scan data were not associated with the response to PP in oxygenation or CO2 in mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS.

Extended versus Standard Proning Duration for COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Rationale: Prone positioning for ⩾16 hours in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) improves survival. However, the optimal duration of proning is unknown. Objectives: To estimate the effect of extended versus standard proning duration on patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ARDS. Methods: Data were extracted from a five-hospital electronic medical record registry. Patients who were proned within 72 hours of mechanical ventilation were categorized as receiving extended (⩾24 h) versus standard (16-24 h) proning based on the first proning session length. We used a target trial emulation design to estimate the effect of extended versus standard proning on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality and secondary outcomes of ventilator liberation and intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Analytically, we used inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox or Fine-Gray regression models. Results: A total of 314 patients were included; 234 received extended proning, and 80 received standard-duration proning. Patients who received extended proning were older, had greater comorbidity, were more often at an academic hospital, and had shorter time from admission to mechanical ventilation. After IPTW, characteristics were well balanced. Unadjusted 90-day mortality in the extended versus standard proning groups was 39% versus 58%. In doubly robust IPTW analyses, we found no significant effects of extended versus standard proning duration on mortality (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.95 [0.51-1.77]), ventilator liberation (subdistribution hazard, 1.60 [0.97-2.64], or ICU discharge (subdistribution hazard, 1.31 [0.82-2.10]). Conclusions: Using target trial emulation, we found no significant effect of extended versus standard proning duration on mortality, ventilator liberation, or ICU discharge. However, given the imprecision of estimates, further study is justified.

Awake pronation with helmet CPAP in early COVID-19 ARDS patients: effects on respiratory effort and distribution of ventilation assessed by EIT

Prone positioning with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is widely used for respiratory support in awake patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory failure. We aimed to assess the respiratory mechanics and distribution of ventilation in COVID-19-associated ARDS treated by CPAP in awake prone position. We studied 16 awake COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. The study protocol consisted of a randomized sequence of supine and prone position with imposed positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 and 10 cmH2O delivered by helmet CPAP. Respiratory mechanics and distribution of ventilation were assessed through esophageal pressure (PES) and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). At the end of each 20-min phase, arterial blood gas analysis was performed, and PES swing and EIT tracings were recorded for the calculation of the respiratory mechanics and regional ventilation. The patient's position had no significant effects on respiratory mechanics. EIT analysis did not detect differences among global indices of ventilation. A significant proportion of pixels in the sternal region of interest showed an increase in compliance from the supine to prone position and PaO2/FIO2 increased accordingly. The best improvement of both PaO2/FIO2 and sternal compliance was obtained in the prone position with PEEP 10 cmH2O. In the studied subjects, prone positioning during CPAP treatment raised oxygenation without improvement of "protective" ventilation or global ventilatory inhomogeneity indices. Prone positioning with higher PEEP significantly increased the compliance of sternal regions.

Effects of different VV ECMO blood flow rates on lung perfusion assessment by hypertonic saline bolus-based electrical impedance tomography

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate the effects of different extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) blood flow rates on lung perfusion assessment using the saline bolus-based electrical impedance tomography (EIT) technique in patients on veno-venous (VV) ECMO.

METHODS

In this single-centered prospective physiological study, patients on VV ECMO who met the ECMO weaning criteria were assessed for lung perfusion using saline bolus-based EIT at various ECMO blood flow rates (gradually decreased from 4.5 L/min to 3.5 L/min, 2.5 L/min, 1.5 L/min, and finally to 0 L/min). Lung perfusion distribution, dead space, shunt, ventilation/perfusion matching, and recirculation fraction at different flow rates were compared.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included. As the ECMO blood flow rate decreased from 4.5 L/min to 0 L/min, the recirculation fraction decreased significantly. The main EIT-based findings were as follows. (1) Median lung perfusion significantly increased in region-of-interest (ROI) 2 and the ventral region [38.21 (34.93-42.16)% to 41.29 (35.32-43.75)%, p = 0.003, and 48.86 (45.53-58.96)% to 54.12 (45.07-61.16)%, p = 0.037, respectively], whereas it significantly decreased in ROI 4 and the dorsal region [7.87 (5.42-9.78)% to 6.08 (5.27-9.34)%, p = 0.049, and 51.14 (41.04-54.47)% to 45.88 (38.84-54.93)%, p = 0.037, respectively]. (2) Dead space significantly decreased, and ventilation/perfusion matching significantly increased in both the ventral and global regions. (3) No significant variations were observed in regional and global shunt.

CONCLUSIONS

During VV ECMO, the ECMO blood flow rate, closely linked to recirculation fraction, could affect the accuracy of lung perfusion assessment using hypertonic saline bolus-based EIT.

New application of saline contrast-enhanced electrical impedance tomography method for right ventriculography besides lung perfusion: detection of right-to-left intracardiac shunt

AIM

Saline contrast-enhanced electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been used to identify the respiratory failure etiologies through assessment of regional lung perfusion at the bedside. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to detect right-to-left intracardiac shunt based on the center of heart (CoH) parameter determined from the early phase of impedance-time curve after saline bolus injection.

METHODS AND RESULT

The timepoints when the saline bolus enter the heart (T0) and the lung regions (T1) are identified at first. A moving time window from T0 to T1 is then generated with steps of 0.5 s and the slope of the impedance-time curve in each pixel within the window calculated. CoH is calculated as the geometric center of pixel slope values in the right-to-left image direction. To illustrate how this method works in practice, we calculated the CoH values at T0 to T1 in 10 control hypoxic patients with no right-to-left shunt. In addition, we examined two critically ill patients with right-to-left intracardiac shunt. One was postcardiac surgery patient who had a residual atrial septal defect by color doppler of transesophageal echocardiograph. The other patient had a congenital heart disease of ventricular septal defect by color doppler of trans-thoracic echocardiography. A large difference in CoH between T0 to T1 was observed in the two patients with intracardiac shunt than in the control patients (11.06 ± 3.17% vs. 1.99 ± 1.43%, P = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

Saline bolus EIT for lung perfusion might be used as ventriculography to identify the right-to-left intracardiac shunt at the bedside.

Absolute values of regional ventilation-perfusion mismatch in patients with ARDS monitored by electrical impedance tomography and the role of dead space and shunt compensation

BACKGROUND

Assessment of regional ventilation/perfusion (V'/Q) mismatch using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) represents a promising advancement for personalized management of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, accuracy is still hindered by the need for invasive monitoring to calibrate ventilation and perfusion. Here, we propose a non-invasive correction that uses only EIT data and characterized patients with more pronounced compensation of V'/Q mismatch.

METHODS

We enrolled twenty-one ARDS patients on controlled mechanical ventilation. Cardiac output was measured invasively, and ventilation and perfusion were assessed by EIT. Relative V'/Q maps by EIT were calibrated to absolute values using the minute ventilation to invasive cardiac output (MV/CO) ratio (V'/Q-ABS), left unadjusted (V'/Q-REL), or corrected by MV/CO ratio derived from EIT data (V'/Q-CORR). The ratio between ventilation to dependent regions and perfusion reaching shunted units ( V D ' /QSHUNT) was calculated as an index of more effective hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. The ratio between perfusion to non-dependent regions and ventilation to dead space units (QND/ V DS ' ) was calculated as an index of hypocapnic pneumoconstriction.

RESULTS

Our calibration factor correlated with invasive MV/CO (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), showed good accuracy and no apparent bias. Compared to V'/Q-ABS, V'/Q-REL maps overestimated ventilation (p = 0.013) and perfusion (p = 0.002) to low V'/Q units and underestimated ventilation (p = 0.011) and perfusion (p = 0.008) to high V'/Q units. The heterogeneity of ventilation and perfusion reaching different V'/Q compartments was underestimated. V'/Q-CORR maps eliminated all these differences with V'/Q-ABS (p > 0.05). HigherV D ' / Q SHUNT correlated with higher PaO2/FiO2 (r = 0.49, p = 0.025) and lower shunt fraction (ρ =  - 0.59, p = 0.005). HigherQ ND / V DS ' correlated with lower PEEP (ρ =  - 0.62, p = 0.003) and plateau pressure (ρ =  - 0.59, p = 0.005). Lower values of both indexes were associated with less ventilator-free days (p = 0.05 and p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional V'/Q maps calibrated with a non-invasive EIT-only method closely approximate the ones obtained with invasive monitoring. Higher efficiency of shunt compensation improves oxygenation while compensation of dead space is less needed at lower airway pressure. Patients with more effective compensation mechanisms could have better outcomes.

Technical Principles and Clinical Applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography in Pulmonary Monitoring

Pulmonary monitoring is crucial for the diagnosis and management of respiratory conditions, especially after the epidemic of coronavirus disease. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an alternative non-radioactive tomographic imaging tool for monitoring pulmonary conditions. This review proffers the current EIT technical principles and applications on pulmonary monitoring, which gives a comprehensive summary of EIT applied on the chest and encourages its extensive usage to clinical physicians. The technical principles involving EIT instrumentations and image reconstruction algorithms are explained in detail, and the conditional selection is recommended based on clinical application scenarios. For applications, specifically, the monitoring of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) is one of the most developed EIT applications. The matching correlation of V/Q could indicate many pulmonary diseases, e.g., the acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary edema. Several recently emerging applications like lung transplantation are also briefly introduced as supplementary applications that have potential and are about to be developed in the future. In addition, the limitations, disadvantages, and developing trends of EIT are discussed, indicating that EIT will still be in a long-term development stage before large-scale clinical applications.

Haemodynamic changes during prone versus supine position in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Prone positioning improves oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19. However, its haemodynamic effects are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the acute haemodynamic changes associated with prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. The primary objective was to describe changes in cardiac index with prone position. The secondary objectives were to describe changes in mean arterial pressure, FiO2, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and oxygen delivery (DO2) with prone position.

METHODS

We performed this cohort-embedded study in an Australian intensive care unit, between September and November 2021. We included adult patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS, requiring mechanical ventilation and prone positioning for respiratory failure. We placed patients in the prone position for 16 h per session. Using pulse contour technology, we collected haemodynamic data every 5 min for 2 h in the supine position and for 2 h in the prone position consecutively.

RESULTS

We studied 18 patients. Cardiac index, stroke volume index, and mean arterial pressure increased significantly in the prone position compared to supine position. The mean cardiac index was higher in the prone group than in the supine group by 0.44 L/min/m2 (95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.63) (P < 0.001). FiO2 requirement decreased significantly in the prone position (P < 0.001), with a significant increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P < 0.001). DO2 also increased significantly in the prone position, from a median DO2 of 597 mls O2/min (interquartile range, 504 to 931) in the supine position to 743 mls O2/min (interquartile range, 604 to 1075) in the prone position (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prone position increased the cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, and DO2 in invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS. These changes may contribute to improved tissue oxygenation and improved outcomes observed in trials of prone positioning.

A novel framework for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography reconstruction of maize ear via feature reconfiguration and residual networks

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) provides an indirect measure of the physiological state and growth of the maize ear by reconstructing the distribution of electrical impedance. However, the two-dimensional (2D) EIT within the electrode plane finds it challenging to comprehensively represent the spatial distribution of conductivity of the intact maize ear, including the husk, kernels, and cob. Therefore, an effective method for 3D conductivity reconstruction is necessary. In practical applications, fluctuations in the contact impedance of the maize ear occur, particularly with the increase in the number of grids and computational workload during the reconstruction of 3D spatial conductivity. These fluctuations may accentuate the ill-conditioning and nonlinearity of the EIT. To address these challenges, we introduce RFNetEIT, a novel computational framework specifically tailored for the absolute imaging of the three-dimensional electrical impedance of maize ear. This strategy transforms the reconstruction of 3D electrical conductivity into a regression process. Initially, a feature map is extracted from measured boundary voltage via a data reconstruction module, thereby enhancing the correlation among different dimensions. Subsequently, a nonlinear mapping model of the 3D spatial distribution of the boundary voltage and conductivity is established, utilizing the residual network. The performance of the proposed framework is assessed through numerical simulation experiments, acrylic model experiments, and maize ear experiments. Our experimental results indicate that our method yields superior reconstruction performance in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (CC), structural similarity index (SSIM), and inverse problem-solving time (IPST). Furthermore, the reconstruction experiments on maize ears demonstrate that the method can effectively reconstruct the 3D conductivity distribution.

The Respiratory Mechanics of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-Lessons Learned?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a well-defined clinical entity characterized by the acute onset of diffuse pulmonary injury and hypoxemia not explained by fluid overload. The COVID-19 pandemic brought about an unprecedented volume of patients with ARDS and challenged our understanding and clinical approach to treatment of this clinical syndrome. Unique to COVID-19 ARDS is the disruption and dysregulation of the pulmonary vascular compartment caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is a significant cause of hypoxemia in these patients. As a result, gas exchange does not necessarily correlate with respiratory system compliance and mechanics in COVID-19 ARDS as it does with other etiologies. The purpose of this review is to relate the mechanics of COVID-19 ARDS to its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms and outline the lessons we have learned in the management of this clinic syndrome.

Lung impedance changes during awake prone positioning in COVID-19. A non-randomized cross-over study

BACKGROUND

The effects of awake prone positioning (APP) on respiratory mechanics in patients with COVID-19 are not well characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate changes of global and regional lung volumes during APP compared with the supine position using electrical lung impedance tomography (EIT) in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This exploratory non-randomized cross-over study was conducted at two university hospitals in Sweden between January and May 2021. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with confirmed COVID-19, an arterial cannula in place, a PaO2/FiO2 ratio <26.6 kPa (<200 mmHg) and high-flow nasal oxygen or non-invasive ventilation were eligible for inclusion. EIT-data were recorded at supine baseline, at 30 and 60 minutes after APP-initiation, and 30 minutes after supine repositioning. The primary outcomes were changes in global and regional tidal impedance variation (TIV), center of ventilation (CoV), global and regional delta end-expiratory lung-impedance (dEELI) and global inhomogeneity (GI) index at the end of APP compared with supine baseline. Data were reported as median (IQR).

RESULTS

All patients (n = 10) were male and age was 64 (47-73) years. There were no changes in global or regional TIV, CoV or GI-index during the intervention. dEELI increased from supine reference value 0 to 1.51 (0.32-3.62) 60 minutes after APP (median difference 1.51 (95% CI 0.19-5.16), p = 0.04) and returned to near baseline values after supine repositioning. Seven patients (70%) showed an increase >0.20 in dEELI during APP. The other EIT-variables did not change during APP compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

Awake prone positioning was associated with a transient lung recruiting effect without changes in ventilation distribution measured with EIT in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.

PEEP-Induced Lung Recruitment Maneuver Combined with Prone Position for ARDS: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Prone position (PP) and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) are both efficient in improving oxygenation and prognosis in patients with ARDS. The synergistic effect of PP combined with PEEP-induced LRM in patients with ARDS remains unclear. We aim to explore the effects of PP combined with PEEP-induced LRM on prognosis in patients with moderate to severe ARDS and the predicting role of lung recruitablity. Methods: Patients with moderate to severe ARDS were consecutively enrolled. The patients were prospectively assigned to either the intervention (PP with PEEP-induced LRM) or control groups (PP). The clinical outcomes, respiratory mechanics, and electric impedance tomography (EIT) monitoring results for the two groups were compared. Lung recruitablity (recruitment-to-inflation ratio: R/I) was measured during the PEEP-induced LRM procedure and was used for predicting the response to LRM. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the final analysis, among which 28 patients (48.2%) received PEEP-induced LRM combined with PP. PEEP-induced LRM enhanced the effect of PP by a significant improvement in oxygenation (∆PaO2/FiO2 75.8 mmHg vs. 4.75 mmHg, p < 0.001) and the compliance of respiratory system (∆Crs, 2 mL/cmH2O vs. -1 mL/cmH2O, p = 0.02) among ARDS patients. Based on the EIT measurement, PP combined with PEEP-induced LRM increased the ventilation distribution mainly in the dorsal region (5.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.015). The R/I ratio was measured in 28 subjects. The higher R/I ratio was related to greater oxygenation improvement after LRM (Pearson's r = 0.4; p = 0.034). Conclusions: In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, PEEP-induced LRM combined with PP can improve oxygenation and dorsal ventilation distribution. R/I can be useful to predict responses to LRM.

Prone Positioning and Molecular Biomarkers in COVID and Non-COVID ARDS: A Narrative Review

Prone positioning (PP) represents a therapeutic intervention with the proven capacity of ameliorating gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics indicated in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). When PP is selectively applied to moderate-severe cases of ARDS, it sensitively affects clinical outcomes, including mortality. After the COVID-19 outbreak, clinical application of PP peaked worldwide and was applied in 60% of treated cases, according to large reports. Research on this topic has revealed many physiological underpinnings of PP, focusing on regional ventilation redistribution and the reduction of parenchymal stress and strain. However, there is a lack of evidence on biomarkers behavior in different phases and phenotypes of ARDS. Patients response to PP are, to date, decided on PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement, whereas scarce data exist on biomarker tracking during PP. The purpose of this review is to explore current evidence on the clinical relevance of biomarkers in the setting of moderate-severe ARDS of different etiologies (i.e., COVID and non-COVID-related ARDS). Moreover, this review focuses on how PP may modulate biomarkers and which biomarkers may have a role in outcome prediction in ARDS patients.

Impact of prone position on dead-space fraction in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 Related Acute Respiratory Syndrome (C-ARDS) is characterized by a mismatch between respiratory mechanics and hypoxemia, suggesting increased dead-space fraction (DSF). Prone position is a cornerstone treatment of ARDS under invasive mechanical ventilation reducing mortality. We sought to investigate the impact of prone position on DSF in C-ARDS in a cohort of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

we retrospectively analysed data from 85 invasively mechanically ventilated patients with C-ARDS in supine and in prone positions, hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit (Reims University Hospital), between November, 1st 2020 and November, 1st 2022. DSF was estimated via 3 formulas usable at patients' bedside, based on partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2).

RESULTS

there was no difference of DSF between supine and prone position, using the 3 formulas. According to Enghoff, Frankenfield and Gattinoni equations, DSF in supine vs. prone position was in median respectively [IQR]: 0.29 [0.13-0.45] vs. 0.31 [0.19-0.51] (p = 0.37), 0.5 [0.48-0.52] vs. 0.51 [0.49-0.53] (p = 0.43), and 0.71 [0.55-0.87] vs. 0.69 [0.57-0.81], (p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

prone position did not change DSF in C-ARDS.

Effects of early versus delayed application of prone position on ventilation-perfusion mismatch in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Prone position has been shown to improve oxygenation and survival in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). These beneficial effects are partly mediated by improved ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) distribution. Few studies have investigated the impact of early versus delayed proning on V/Q distribution in patients with ARDS. The aim of this study was to assess the regional ventilation and perfusion distribution in early versus persistent ARDS after prone position.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study from June 30, 2021, to October 1, 2022 at the medical ICU in Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University. Fifty-seven consecutive adult patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS ventilated in supine and prone position. Electrical impedance tomography was used to study V/Q distribution in the supine position and 12 h after a prone session.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients, 33 were early ARDS (≤ 7 days) and 24 were persistent ARDS (> 7 days). Oxygenation significantly improved after proning in early ARDS (157 [121, 191] vs. 190 [164, 245] mm Hg, p < 0.001), whereas no significant change was found in persistent ARDS patients (168 [136, 232] vs.177 [155, 232] mm Hg, p = 0.10). Compared to supine position, prone reduced V/Q mismatch in early ARDS (28.7 [24.6, 35.4] vs. 22.8 [20.0, 26.8] %, p < 0.001), but increased V/Q mismatch in persistent ARDS (23.8 [19.8, 28.6] vs. 30.3 [24.5, 33.3] %, p = 0.006). In early ARDS, proning significantly reduced shunt in the dorsal region and dead space in the ventral region. In persistent ARDS, proning increased global shunt. A significant correlation was found between duration of ARDS onset to proning and the change in V/Q distribution (r = 0.54, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prone position significantly reduced V/Q mismatch in patients with early ARDS, while it increased V/Q mismatch in persistent ARDS patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05207267, principal investigator Ling Liu, date of registration 2021.08.20).

Prone Positioning for Patients With COVID-19-Induced Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Flipping the Script

During the COVID-19 pandemic, prone positioning (PP) emerged as a widely used supportive therapy for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 infection. In particular, awake PP (APP)-the placement of non-intubated patients in the prone position-has gained popularity and hence is detailed first herein. This review discusses recent publications on the use of PP for non-intubated and intubated subjects with COVID-19, highlighting the physiological responses, clinical outcomes, influential factors affecting treatment success, and strategies to improve adherence with APP. The use of prolonged PP and the use of PP for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are also presented.

Pronation Reveals a Heterogeneous Response of Global and Regional Respiratory Mechanics in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

OBJECTIVES

Experimental models suggest that prone position and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) homogenize ventral-dorsal ventilation distribution and regional respiratory compliance. However, this response still needs confirmation on humans. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the changes in global and regional respiratory mechanics in supine and prone positions over a range of PEEP levels in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Twenty-two intubated patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 pneumonia.

INTERVENTIONS

Electrical impedance tomography and esophageal manometry were applied during PEEP titrations from 20 cm H2O to 6 cm H2O in supine and prone positions.

MEASUREMENTS

Global respiratory system compliance (Crs), chest wall compliance, regional lung compliance, ventilation distribution in supine and prone positions.

MAIN RESULTS

Compared with supine position, the maximum level of Crs changed after prone position in 59% of ARDS patients (n = 13), of which the Crs decreased in 32% (n = 7) and increased in 27% (n = 6). To reach maximum Crs after pronation, PEEP was changed in 45% of the patients by at least 4 cm H2O. After pronation, the ventilation and compliance of the dorsal region did not consistently change in the entire sample of patients, increasing specifically in a subgroup of patients who showed a positive change in Crs when transitioning from supine to prone position. These combined changes in ventilation and compliance suggest dorsal recruitment postpronation. In addition, the subgroup with increased Crs postpronation demonstrated the most pronounced difference between dorsal and ventral ventilation distribution from supine to prone position (p = 0.01), indicating heterogeneous ventilation distribution in prone position.

CONCLUSIONS

Prone position modifies global respiratory compliance in most patients with ARDS. Only a subgroup of patients with a positive change in Crs postpronation presented a consistent improvement in dorsal ventilation and compliance. These data suggest that the response to pronation on global and regional mechanics can vary among ARDS patients, with some patients presenting more dorsal lung recruitment than others.

[Expert consensus on the clinical treatment of burn patients complicated with Coronavirus infection (2023 version)]

With China downgrading the management of Coronavirus infection (COVID-19) from Category A to Category B, a large number of COVID-19 patients have occurred in multiple waves across the country. Meanwhile, the long-term impact of Coronavirus on the body has gradually been noticed. However, the clinical treatment of burns complicated with COVID-19 is still a major challenge in Chinese burn centers. It is then essential to standardize the clinical treatment of such patients, improve the prognosis to the greatest extent, and provide valuable experiences for similar infectious diseases in future. Therefore, Chinese Burn Association, Burn Medicine Branch of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Healthcare, and Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Burns and Wounds jointly initiated and organized multidisciplinary experts to develop this expert consensus based on the current medical evidence, clinical practice, and authoritative guidelines of other disciplines, in order to standardize the clinical treatment of burn patients complicated with COVID-19.

Awake prone positioning in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure

Awake prone positioning (APP) of patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure gained considerable attention during the early phases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, reports of APP were limited to case series in patients with influenza and in immunocompromised patients, with encouraging results in terms of tolerance and oxygenation improvement. Prone positioning of awake patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure appears to result in many of the same physiological changes improving oxygenation seen in invasively ventilated patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. A number of randomised controlled studies published on patients with varying severity of COVID-19 have reported apparently contrasting outcomes. However, there is consistent evidence that more hypoxaemic patients requiring advanced respiratory support, who are managed in higher care environments and who can be prone for several hours, benefit most from APP use. We review the physiological basis by which prone positioning results in changes in lung mechanics and gas exchange and summarise the latest evidence base for APP primarily in COVID-19. We examine the key factors that influence the success of APP, the optimal target populations for APP and the key unknowns that will shape future research.

Mechanical power normalized to aerated lung predicts noninvasive ventilation failure and death and contributes to the benefits of proning in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure

Background

Concern exists that noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may promote ventilation-induced lung injury(VILI) and worsen outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Different individual ventilatory variables have been proposed to predict clinical outcomes, with inconsistent results.Mechanical power (MP), a measure of the energy transfer rate from the ventilator to the respiratory system during mechanical ventilation, might provide solutions for this issue in the framework of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine (PPPM). We explored (1) the impact of ventilator-delivered MP normalized to well-aerated lung (MP_WAL) on physio-anatomical and clinical responses to NIV in COVID-19-related AHRF and (2) the effect of prone position(PP) on MP_WAL.

Methods

We analyzed 216 noninvasively ventilated COVID-19 patients (108 patients receiving PP + NIV and 108 propensity score-matched patients receiving supine NIV) with moderate-to-severe(paO2/FiO2 ratio < 200) AHRF enrolled in the PRO-NIV controlled non-randomized study (ISRCTN23016116).Quantification of differentially aerated lung volumes by lung ultrasonography (LUS) was validated against CT scans. Respiratory parameters were hourly recorded, ABG were performed 1 h after each postural change. Time-weighed average values of ventilatory variables, including MP_WAL, and gas exchange parameters (paO2/FiO2 ratio, dead space indices) were calculated for each ventilatory session. LUS and circulating biomarkers were assessed daily.

Results

Compared with supine position, PP was associated with a 34% MP_WAL reduction, attributable largely to an absolute MP reduction and secondly to an enhanced lung reaeration.Patients receiving a high MP_WAL during the 1^st 24 h of NIV [MP_WAL(day 1)] had higher 28-d NIV failure (HR = 4.33,95%CI:3.09 - 5.98) and death (HR = 5.17,95%CI: 3.01 - 7.35) risks than those receiving a low MP_WAL(day 1).In Cox multivariate analyses, MP_WAL(day 1) remained independently associated with 28-d NIV failure (HR = 1.68,95%CI:1.15-2.41) and death (HR = 1.69,95%CI:1.22-2.32).MP_WAL(day 1) outperformed other power measures and ventilatory variables as predictor of 28-d NIV failure (AUROC = 0.89;95%CI:0.85-0.93) and death (AUROC = 0.89;95%CI:0.85-0.94).MP_WAL(day 1) predicted also gas exchange, ultrasonographic and inflammatory biomarker responses, as markers of VILI, on linear multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

In the framework of PPPM, early bedside MP_WAL calculation may provide added value to predict response to NIV and guide subsequent therapeutic choices i.e. prone position adoption during NIV or upgrading to invasive ventilation, to reduce hazardous MP_WAL delivery, prevent VILI progression and improve clinical outcomes in COVID-19-related AHRF.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-023-00325-5.

New and personalized ventilatory strategies in patients with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and may lead to severe respiratory failure and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV). At hospital admission, patients can present with severe hypoxemia and dyspnea requiring increasingly aggressive MV strategies according to the clinical severity: noninvasive respiratory support (NRS), MV, and the use of rescue strategies such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Among NRS strategies, new tools have been adopted for critically ill patients, with advantages and disadvantages that need to be further elucidated. Advances in the field of lung imaging have allowed better understanding of the disease, not only the pathophysiology of COVID-19 but also the consequences of ventilatory strategies. In cases of refractory hypoxemia, the use of ECMO has been advocated and knowledge on handling and how to personalize strategies have increased during the pandemic. The aims of the present review are to: (1) discuss the evidence on different devices and strategies under NRS; (2) discuss new and personalized management under MV based on the pathophysiology of COVID-19; and (3) contextualize the use of rescue strategies such as ECMO in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Pathophysiology of Hypoxemia in COVID-19 Lung Disease

As the pandemic has progressed, our understanding of hypoxemia in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lung disease has become more nuanced, although much remains to be understood. In this article, we review ventilation-perfusion mismatching in COVID-19 and the evidence to support various biologic theories offered in explanation. In addition, the relationship between hypoxemia and other features of severe COVID-19 lung disease such as respiratory symptoms, radiographic abnormalities, and pulmonary mechanics is explored. Recognizing and understanding hypoxemia in COVID-19 lung disease remains essential for risk stratification, prognostication, and choice of appropriate treatments in severe COVID-19.

Is COVID-19 different from other causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia can lead to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. When mechanical ventilation is needed, almost all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia meet the criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The question of the specificities of COVID-19-associated ARDS compared to other causes of ARDS is of utmost importance, as it may justify changes in ventilatory strategies. This review aims to describe the pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated ARDS and discusses whether specific ventilatory strategies are required in these patients.

Evaluation of Different Contrast Agents for Regional Lung Perfusion Measurement Using Electrical Impedance Tomography: An Experimental Pilot Study

Monitoring regional blood flow distribution in the lungs appears to be useful for individually optimizing ventilation therapy. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) can be used at the bedside for indicator-based regional lung perfusion measurement. Hypertonic saline is widely used as a contrast agent but could be problematic for clinical use due to potential side effects. In five ventilated healthy pigs, we investigated the suitability of five different injectable and clinically approved solutions as contrast agents for EIT-based lung perfusion measurement. Signal extraction success rate, signal strength, and image quality were analyzed after repeated 10 mL bolus injections during temporary apnea. The best results were obtained using NaCl 5.85% and sodium-bicarbonate 8.4% with optimal success rates (100%, each), the highest signal strengths (100 ± 25% and 64 ± 17%), and image qualities (r = 0.98 ± 0.02 and 0.95 ± 0.07). Iomeprol 400 mg/mL (non-ionic iodinated X-ray contrast medium) and Glucose 5% (non-ionic glucose solution) resulted in mostly well usable signals with above average success rates (87% and 89%), acceptable signal strength (32 ± 8% and 16 + 3%), and sufficient image qualities (r = 0.80 ± 0.19 and 0.72 ± 0.21). Isotonic balanced crystalloid solution failed due to a poor success rate (42%), low signal strength (10 ± 4%), and image quality (r = 0.43 ± 0.28). While Iomeprol might enable simultaneous EIT and X-ray measurements, glucose might help to avoid sodium and chloride overload. Further research should address optimal doses to balance reliability and potential side effects.

Hemodynamic Implications of Prone Positioning in Patients with ARDS

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2023. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2023 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .

Outcomes comparison between the first and the subsequent SARS-CoV-2 waves - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, health care professionals dealing with COVID-19 had to rely exclusively on general supportive measures since specific treatments were unknown. The subsequent waves could be faced with new diagnostic and therapeutic tools (e.g., anti-viral medications and vaccines). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare clinical endpoints between the first and subsequent waves.

Methods

Three databases were assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), acute renal failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis and ventilator associated pneumonia.

Results

A total of 25 studies with 126,153 patients were included. There was no significant difference for the primary endpoint (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.35). The first wave group presented higher rates of ICU LOS (SMD= 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.35, p<0.01), acute renal failure (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.15, p<0.01) and ECMO implantation (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52, p=0.03). The other endpoints did not show significant differences.

Conclusions

The analysis suggests that the first wave group, when compared with the subsequent waves group, presented higher rates of ICU LOS, acute renal failure and ECMO implantation, without significant difference in in-hospital or ICU mortality, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis or ventilator- associated pneumonia.

Segmental Lung Recruitment in Patients with Bilateral COVID-19 Pneumonia Complicated by Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Report

Bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and usually leads to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Treatment of patients with ARDS is difficult and usually involves protective mechanical ventilation and various types of recruitment maneuvers. A segmental lung recruitment maneuver by independent lung ventilation has been described as a successful recruitment maneuver in patients with lobar pneumonia, and may, therefore, be useful for the treatment of patients with bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by ARDS in the critical phase of the disease when all other therapeutic options have been exhausted. The aim of this case series was to present a case report of four mechanically ventilated patients with severe bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by ARDS using the segmental lung recruitment maneuver. The effect of the segmental lung recruitment maneuver was assessed by the increase in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio and the lung ultrasound (LUS) scoring system (0 points-presence of sliding lungs with A-lines or one or two isolated B-lines; 1 point-moderate loss of lung ventilation with three to five B lines; 2 points-severe loss of lung ventilation with more than five B lines (B pattern); and 3 points-lung consolidation) determined 12, 24, and 48 h after segmental lung recruitment. In three of four patients with bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by ARDS, an increase in the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio and an improvement in the LUS scoring system were observed 48 h after segmental lung recruitment. In conclusion, the segmental lung recruitment maneuver in patients with bilateral COVID-19 complicated by ARDS is an effective method of lung recruitment and may be a useful treatment method.

Pathophysiology and Clinical Meaning of Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains an important clinical challenge with a mortality rate of 35-45%. It is being increasingly demonstrated that the improvement of outcomes requires a tailored, individualized approach to therapy, guided by a detailed understanding of each patient's pathophysiology. In patients with ARDS, disturbances in the physiological matching of alveolar ventilation (V) and pulmonary perfusion (Q) (V/Q mismatch) are a hallmark derangement. The perfusion of collapsed or consolidated lung units gives rise to intrapulmonary shunting and arterial hypoxemia, whereas the ventilation of non-perfused lung zones increases physiological dead-space, which potentially necessitates increased ventilation to avoid hypercapnia. Beyond its impact on gas exchange, V/Q mismatch is a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with ARDS; more recently, its role in ventilation-induced lung injury and worsening lung edema has been described. Innovations in bedside imaging technologies such as electrical impedance tomography readily allow clinicians to determine the regional distributions of V and Q, as well as the adequacy of their matching, providing new insights into the phenotyping, prognostication, and clinical management of patients with ARDS. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology, identification, consequences, and treatment of V/Q mismatch in the setting of ARDS, employing experimental data from clinical and preclinical studies as support.

Effect of prone positioning on end-expiratory lung volume, strain and oxygenation change over time in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective physiological study

Background

Prone position (PP) is a recommended intervention in severe classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Changes in lung resting volume, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during a 16-h cycle of PP in COVID-19 ARDS has not been yet elucidated.

Methods

Patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS were enrolled between May and September 2021 in a prospective cohort study in a University Teaching Hospital. Lung resting volume was quantitatively assessed by multiple breath nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique to measure the end-expiratory lung volume (EELV). Timepoints included the following: Baseline, Supine Position (S1); start of PP (P0), and every 4-h (P4; P8; P12) until the end of PP (P16); and Supine Position (S2). Respiratory mechanics and gas exchange were assessed at each timepoint.

Measurements and main results

40 mechanically ventilated patients were included. EELV/predicted body weight (PBW) increased significantly over time. The highest increase was observed at P4. The highest absolute EELV/PBW values were observed at the end of the PP (P16 vs S1; median 33.5 ml/kg [InterQuartileRange, 28.2-38.7] vs 23.4 ml/kg [18.5-26.4], p < 0.001). Strain decreased immediately after PP and remained stable between P4 and P16. PaO2/FiO2 increased during PP reaching the highest level at P12 (P12 vs S1; 163 [138-217] vs 81 [65-97], p < 0.001). EELV/PBW, strain and PaO2/FiO2 decreased at S2 although EELV/PBW and PaO2/FiO2 were still significantly higher as compared to S1. Both absolute values over time and changes of strain and PaO2/FiO2 at P16 and S2 versus S1 were strongly associated with EELV/PBW levels.

Conclusion

In severe COVID-19 ARDS, EELV steadily increased over a 16-h cycle of PP peaking at P16. Strain gradually decreased, and oxygenation improved over time. Changes in strain and oxygenation at the end of PP and back to SP were strongly associated with changes in EELV/PBW. Whether the change in EELV and oxygenation during PP may play a role on outcomes in COVID-ARDS deserves further investigation.

Clinical trial registration

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04818164].

Lung ultrasound response to awake prone positioning predicts the need for intubation in patients with COVID-19 induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: an observational study

Background

Awake prone positioning (APP) reduces the intubation rate in COVID-19 patients treated by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). However, the lung aeration response to APP has not been addressed. We aimed to explore the lung aeration response to APP by lung ultrasound (LUS).

Methods

This two-center, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with COVID-19-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure treated by HFNC and APP. LUS score was recorded 5–10 min before, 1 h after APP, and 5–10 min after supine in the first APP session within the first three days. The primary outcome was LUS score changes in the first three days. Secondary outcomes included changes in SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio, respiratory rate and ROX index (SpO₂/FiO₂/respiratory rate) related to APP, and the rate of treatment success (patients who avoided intubation).

Results

Seventy-one patients were enrolled. LUS score decreased from 20 (interquartile range [IQR] 19–24) to 19 (18–21) (p < 0.001) after the first APP session, and to 19 (18–21) (p < 0.001) after three days. Compared to patients with treatment failure (n = 20, 28%), LUS score reduction after the first three days in patients with treatment success (n = 51) was greater (− 2.6 [95% confidence intervals − 3.1 to − 2.0] vs 0 [− 1.2 to 1.2], p = 0.001). A decrease in dorsal LUS score > 1 after the first APP session was associated with decreased risk for intubation (Relative risk 0.25 [0.09–0.69]). APP daily duration was correlated with LUS score reduction in patients with treatment success, especially in dorsal lung zones (r =  − 0.76; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and treated by HFNC, APP reduced LUS score. The reduction in dorsal LUS scores after APP was associated with treatment success. The longer duration on APP was correlated with greater lung aeration.

Trial registration This study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov on April 22, 2021. Identification number NCT04855162.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04064-3.

Biological effects of COVID-19 on lung cancer: Can we drive our decisions

COVID-19 infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 is considered catastrophic because it affects multiple organs, particularly those of the respiratory tract. Although the consequences of this infection are not fully clear, it causes damage to the lungs, the cardiovascular and nervous systems, and other organs, subsequently inducing organ failure. In particular, the effects of SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation on cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment need to be investigated. COVID-19 may alter the tumor microenvironment, promoting cancer cell proliferation and dormant cancer cell (DCC) reawakening. DCCs reawakened upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 can populate the premetastatic niche in the lungs and other organs, leading to tumor dissemination. DCC reawakening and consequent neutrophil and monocyte/macrophage activation with an uncontrolled cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines are the most severe clinical effects of COVID-19. Moreover, neutrophil extracellular traps have been demonstrated to activate the dissemination of premetastatic cells into the lungs. Further studies are warranted to better define the roles of COVID-19 in inflammation as well as in tumor development and tumor cell metastasis; the results of these studies will aid in the development of further targeted therapies, both for cancer prevention and the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

Prone positioning in ARDS patients supported with VV ECMO, what we should explore?

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a prevalent cause of admittance to intensive care units, is associated with high mortality. Prone positioning has been proven to improve the outcomes of moderate to severe ARDS patients owing to its physiological effects. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) will be considered in patients with severe hypoxemia. However, for patients with severe hypoxemia supported with VV ECMO, the potential effects and optimal strategies of prone positioning remain unclear. This review aimed to present these controversial questions and highlight directions for future research.

Main body

The clinically significant benefit of prone positioning and early VV ECMO alone was confirmed in patients with severe ARDS. However, a number of questions regarding the combination of VV ECMO and prone positioning remain unanswered. We discussed the potential effects of prone positioning on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and outcomes. Strategies to achieve optimal outcomes, including indications, timing, duration, and frequency of prone positioning, as well as the management of respiratory drive during prone positioning sessions in ARDS patients receiving VV ECMO, are challenging and controversial. Additionally, whether and how to implement prone positioning according to ARDS phenotypes should be evaluated. Lung morphology monitored by computed tomography, lung ultrasound, or electrical impedance tomography might be a potential indication to make an individualized plan for prone positioning therapy in patients supported with VV ECMO.

Conclusion

For patients with ARDS supported with VV ECMO, the potential effects of prone positioning have yet to be clarified. Ensuring an optimal strategy, especially an individualized plan for prone positioning therapy during VV ECMO, is particularly challenging and requires further research.