Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury

Care Decisions in the Hospital: Challenges for Family Members of Hospitalized Persons With Dementia

CONTEXT

Family members of hospitalized persons living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex, high-stakes decisions and experience significant psychological distress. Prior studies of hospitalized patients have focused on the ethical, intrapersonal, and communication-related challenges specific to surrogate decision-making, but few have explored challenges specific to families of PLWD.

OBJECTIVES

To understand challenges faced by family members of hospitalized older PLWD as they navigate care decisions.

METHODS

This is a qualitative study of family members of hospitalized PLWD from February to December 2020. Hospitalized patients >50 years old with an ICD-coded diagnosis of dementia were identified from the EHR along with at least one family member, and approached for a semistructured interview about decision-making experiences. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded by seven investigators using an inductive and constant comparative approach.

RESULTS

Thirty family members completed interviews for 26 unique PLWD. Mean participant age was 62.6 years; 66.7% were female and most identified as the PLWD's adult child (53.3%) or spouse (26.7%). The following themes emerged: 1) determining the PLWD's quality of life, 2) navigating uncertainty in the context of dementia and acute hospitalization, 3) translating PLWD's preferences into high-stakes decisions within the context of progressive cognitive impairment, and 4) unique decision-making challenges related to the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Family members of hospitalized PLWD faced dementia-specific challenges when making care decisions. Interventions that account for these challenges are needed to better support family members of hospitalized PLWD as they navigate these decisions.

Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Stroke in Neurocritical Care: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis

Decision-making for patients with stroke in neurocritical care is uniquely challenging because of the gravity and high preference sensitivity of these decisions. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended to align decisions with patient values. However, limited evidence exists on the experiences and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in SDM for neurocritical patients with stroke. This review aims to address this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the experiences and perspectives of those involved in SDM for neurocritical stroke care to inform best practices in this context. A qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted following the methodological guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), using the thematic synthesis approach outlined by Thomas and Harden. Database searches covered PubMed, CIHAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception to July 2023, supplemented by manual searches. After screening, quality appraisal was performed using the JBI Appraisal Checklist. Data analysis comprised line-by-line coding, development of descriptive themes, and creation of analytical themes using NVivo 12 software. The initial search yielded 7,492 articles, with 94 undergoing full-text screening. Eighteen articles from five countries, published between 2010 and 2023, were included in the meta-synthesis. These studies focused on the SDM process, covering life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), palliative care, and end-of-life care, with LST decisions being most common. Four analytical themes, encompassing ten descriptive themes, emerged: prognostic uncertainty, multifaceted balancing act, tripartite role dynamics and information exchange, and influences of sociocultural context. These themes form the basis for a conceptual model offering deeper insights into the essential elements, relationships, and behaviors that characterize SDM in neurocritical care. This meta-synthesis of 18 primary studies offers a higher-order interpretation and an emerging conceptual understanding of SDM in neurocritical care, with implications for practice and further research. The complex role dynamics among SDM stakeholders require careful consideration, highlighting the need for stroke-specific communication strategies. Expanding the evidence base across diverse sociocultural settings is critical to enhance the understanding of SDM in neurocritical patients with stroke.Trial registration This study is registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42023461608.

[Recommendations for time-limited trial in neurocritical care]

Many acute brain disorders are associated with acute disorders of consciousness. In an emergency situation, life-saving measures are usually taken first and intensive care is initiated. If there is no significant improvement with recovery of consciousness in the first few days, very complex decision-making situations arise regularly. In neurointensive care, a time-limited therapy trial (TLT) is an important structuring element in treatment planning and communication, as a binding agreement between the treatment team and the patient or legal representative on a treatment concept for a defined period of time. Due to the prolonged neurological rehabilitation phase, the TLT in neurointensive care can also last weeks or months. This often requires interdepartmental communication (acute/rehabilitation/long-term care), re-evaluation and implementation in neurointensive care. The recommendations include the definition, empirical evidence and implementation suggestions for a TLT for critically ill neurointensive care patients.

Palliative care in acute care surgery: research challenges and opportunities

Palliative care includes effective communication, relief of suffering and symptom management with an underlying goal of improving the quality of life for patients with serious illness and their families. Best practice palliative care is delivered in parallel with life-sustaining or life-prolonging care. Palliative care affirms life and regards death as a normal process, intends neither to hasten death nor to postpone death and includes but is not limited to end-of-life care. Palliative care encompasses both primary palliative care (which can and should be incorporated into the practice of acute care surgery) and specialty palliative care (consultation with a fellowship-trained palliative care provider). Acute care surgeons routinely care for individuals who may benefit from palliative care. Patients exposed to traumatic injury, emergency surgical conditions, major burns and/or critical surgical illness are more likely to be experiencing a serious illness than other hospitalized patients. Palliative care research is urgently needed in acute care surgery. At present, minimal high-quality research is available to guide selection of palliative care interventions. This narrative review summarizes the current state of research challenges and opportunities to address palliative care in acute care surgery. Palliative care research in acute care surgery can rely on either primary data collection or secondary and administrative data. Each approach has its advantages and limitations, which we will review in this article.

Navigating Neurologic Illness: Skills in Neuropalliative Care for Persons Hospitalized with Neurologic Disease

Persons hospitalized for neurologic illness face multidimensional care needs. They can benefit from a palliative care approach that focuses on quality of life for persons with serious illness. We describe neurology provider "skills" to help meet these palliative needs: assessing the patient as a whole; facilitating conversations with patients to connect prognosis to care preferences; navigating neurologic illness to prepare patients and care partners for the future; providing high-quality end-of-life care to promote peace in death; and addressing disparities in care delivery.

Characterizing the Use of Time-Limited Trials in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective, Single-Center Observational Study

IMPORTANCE

A time-limited trial (TLT) is a collaborative plan among clinicians, patients, and families to use life-sustaining therapy for a defined duration, after which the patient's response informs whether to continue care directed toward recovery or shift the focus toward comfort. TLTs are a promising approach to help navigate uncertainty in critical illness, yet little is known about their current use.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize TLT use in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective 12-month observational cohort study at an U.S. academic medical center of adult ICU patients with ARF receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than or equal to 48 hours.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary exposure was TLT participation, identified by patients' ICU physician. Patient characteristics, care delivery elements, and hospital outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Among 176 eligible patients, 36 (20.5%) participated in a TLT. Among 18 ICU attending physicians, nine (50%) participated in greater than or equal to 1 TLT (frequency 0-39% of patients cared for). Median TLT duration was 3.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-4.5 d). TLT patients had a higher mean age (67.4 yr [sd, 12.0 yr] vs. 60.0 yr [sd, 16.0 yr]; p < 0.01), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (5.1 [sd, 2.2] vs. 3.8 [sd, 2.6]; p < 0.01), and similar Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (9.6 [sd, 3.3] vs. 9.5 [sd, 3.7]; p = 0.93), compared with non-TLT patients. TLT patients were more likely to die or be discharged to hospice (80.6% vs. 42.1%; p < 0.05) and had shorter ICU length of stay (median, 5.7 d [IQR, 4.0-9.0 d] vs. 10.3 d [IQR, 5.5-14.5 d]; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, approximately one in five patients with ARF participated in a TLT. Our findings suggest TLTs are used primarily in patients near end of life but with substantial physician variation, highlighting a need for evidence to guide optimal use.

Would You Rather: Quantifying Traumatic Brain Injury Survivor Perceptions of Functional Status Through Their Surrogates

OBJECTIVE

To quantify health utilities of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) states after actual traumatic brain injury (TBI).

BACKGROUND

Recovery after TBI is measured using the GOSE, a validated clinical trial endpoint. A recent public survey quantified the health utilities of some GOSE states after hypothetical TBI as worse than death. However, no health utilities exist for disability after actual TBI.

METHODS

This national computer-adaptive survey followed Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research-Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guidelines and recruited adult TBI survivors (injury >1 year prior) through their available surrogates. Using a standard gamble approach in randomized order, participants gave preferences for post-TBI categorical health states ranging from GOSE 2 to GOSE 8. We calculated median (interquartile range) health utilities for each GOSE state, from -1 (worse than death) to 1 (full health), with 0 as reference (death, GOSE 1).

RESULTS

Of 515 eligible, 298 surrogates (58%) consented and completed the scenarios on TBI survivors' behalf. TBI survivors had a current median GOSE 5 (3-7). GOSE 2, GOSE 3, and GOSE 4 were rated worse than death by 89%, 64%, and 38%, respectively. The relationship was nonlinear, and intervals were unequal between states, with a bimodal distribution for GOSE 4.

CONCLUSIONS

In this index study of actual post-TBI disability, poor neurological outcomes represented by GOSE 2 to GOSE 4 were perceived as worse than death by at least one in 3 survivors. Similar to previously reported public perceptions after a hypothetical TBI, these long-term perceptions may inform earlier post-TBI shared decision-making, as well as help shape value-based research and quality of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-economic and value-based evaluations.

Time-Limited Trials for Patients With Critical Illness: A Review of the Literature

TOPIC IMPORTANCE

Since the 1990s, time-limited trials have been described as an approach to navigate uncertain benefits and limits of life-sustaining therapies in patients with critical illness. In this review, we aim to synthesize the evidence on time-limited trials in critical care, establish what is known, and highlight important knowledge gaps.

REVIEW FINDINGS

We identified 18 empirical studies and 15 ethical analyses about time-limited trials in patients with critical illness. Observational studies suggest time-limited trials are part of current practice in ICUs in the United States, but their use varies according to unit and physician factors. Some ICU physicians are familiar with, endorse, and have participated in time-limited trials, and some older adults appear to favor time-limited trial strategies over indefinite life-sustaining therapy or care immediately focused on comfort. When time-limited trials are used, they are often implemented incompletely and challenged by systematic barriers (eg, continually rotating ICU staff). Predictive modeling studies support prevailing clinical wisdom that prognostic uncertainty decreases over time in the ICU for some patients. One study prospectively comparing usual ICU care with an intervention designed to support time-limited trials yielded promising preliminary results. Ethical analyses describe time-limited trials as a pragmatic approach within the longstanding discussion about withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapies.

SUMMARY

Time-limited trials are endorsed by physicians, align with the priorities of some older adults, and are part of current practice. Substantial efforts are needed to test their impact on patient-centered outcomes, improve their implementation, and maximize their potential benefit.

Surrogate Perception of Disability after Hospitalization for Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) is a measure of recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Public surveys rate some GOSE states as worse than death. Direct family experience caring for patients with TBI may impact views of post-TBI disability.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a national cross-sectional computer-adaptive survey of surrogates of TBI dependents incurring injury more than 1 year earlier. Using a standard gamble approach in randomized order, surrogates evaluated preferences for post-TBI GOSE states from GOSE 2 (bedridden, unaware) to GOSE 8 (good recovery). We calculated median (interquartile range [IQR]) health utilities for each post-TBI state, ranging from -1 to 1, with 0 as reference (death = GOSE 1), and assessed sociodemographic associations using proportional odds logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of 515 eligible surrogates, 298 (58%) completed scenarios. Surrogates were median aged 46 (IQR 35 to 60), 54% married, with Santa Clara strength of faith 14 (10 to 18). TBI dependents had a median GOSE5 (3 to 7). Median (IQR) health utility ratings for GOSE 2, GOSE 3, and GOSE 4 were -0.06 (-0.50 to -0.01), -0.01 (-0.30 to 0.45), and 0.30 (-0.01 to 0.80), rated worse than death by 91%, 65%, and 40%, respectively. Surrogates rated GOSE 4 (daily partial help) worse than the general population. Married surrogates rated GOSE 4 higher (p < 0.01). Higher strength of faith was associated with higher utility scores across GOSE states (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

In this index study of surrogate perceptions about disability after TBI, poor neurologic outcomes-vegetative, needing all-day or partial daily assistance-were perceived as worse than death by at least 1 in 3 surrogates. Surrogate perceptions differed from the unexposed public. Long-term perceptions about post-TBI disability may inform earlier, tailored shared decision-making after neurotrauma.

Long-Term Psychological Distress Among Surrogate Decision Makers for Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White Patients With Severe Stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

During acute hospitalizations, physicians often focus on the stroke patient and not family who may be traumatized by this sudden change to their loved one. We investigated long-term psychological distress among family surrogate decision makers for Mexican American (MA) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) severe stroke patients. Previous work in other diseases suggested worse psychological outcomes in MA than NHW caregivers.

METHODS

This was a population-based, prospective cohort study in Nueces County, TX. Stroke patient participants and their surrogate decision makers were enrolled soon after any stroke between April, 2016, and October, 2020, if surrogates had made decisions about life-sustaining treatments. Surrogates completed validated measures of posttraumatic stress, National Stressful Events Survey for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Short Scale; anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; and depression, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 at discharge, 3, 6, and 12 months. Ethnic differences were assessed with multilevel linear mixed models, sequentially adjusted for prespecified patient and surrogate demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical covariates.

RESULTS

There were 301 family surrogates for 241 severe stroke patients. The mean follow-up was 315 days. High scores on measures of psychological distress ranged between 17% and 28% of surrogates. One or more high levels of the psychological outcomes were found in 17%-43% of surrogates; 2 or more were found in 12%-27%; and all 3 were found in 5%-16% of surrogates. All psychological outcomes were worse among MAs on unadjusted analyses. In fully adjusted models, posttraumatic stress remained worse among MAs (0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.56); ethnic differences were attenuated and no longer significant in the final model for anxiety (0.59, 95% CI -0.55 to 1.74) and depression (0.97, 95% CI -0.25 to 2.19). The trajectory for depression did differ by ethnicity (interaction p = 0.03), with depression score improving more rapidly over time among NHWs than MAs. Advance care plans did not seem to confound any ethnic differences.

DISCUSSION

Psychological distress is common among family surrogate decision makers in the year after stroke and may be worse among MAs. Efforts are needed to support family members of all ethnic groups after severe stroke.

An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty

Purpose of review

We investigate the complexities and interplay between the concepts of prognostic uncertainty and patient preferences as they relate to the delivery of goal-concordant care to patients with severe acute brain injuries (SABI) in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU).

Recent findings

Patients with SABI in the Neuro-ICU have unique palliative care needs due to sudden, often unexpected changes in personhood and quality of life. A substantial amount of uncertainty is inherent and poses a challenge to both the patient's prognosis and treatment preferences. The delivery of goal-concordant care can be difficult to achieve.

Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations

Older adults account for a disproportionate share of the morbidity and mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Predicting functional and cognitive outcomes for individual older adults after TBI is challenging in the acute phase of injury. Given that neurologic recovery is possible and uncertain, life-sustaining therapy may be pursued initially, even if for some, there is a risk of survival to an undesired level of disability or dependence. Experts recommend early conversations about goals of care after TBI, but evidence-based guidelines for these discussions or for the optimal method for communicating prognosis are limited. The time-limited trial (TLT) model may be an effective strategy for managing prognostic uncertainty after TBI. TLTs can provide a framework for early management: specific treatments or procedures are used for a defined period of time while monitoring for an agreed-upon outcome. Outcome measures, including signs of worsening and improvement, are defined at the outset of the trial. In this Viewpoint article, we discuss the use of TLTs for older adults with TBI, their potential benefits, and current challenges to their application. Three main barriers limit the implementation of TLTs in these scenarios: inadequate models for prognostication; cognitive biases faced by clinicians and surrogate decision-makers, which may contribute to prognostic discordance; and ambiguity regarding appropriate endpoints for the TLT. Further study is needed to understand clinician behaviors and surrogate preferences for prognostic communication and how to optimally integrate TLTs into the care of older adults with TBI.

Decision Aids in the ICU: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesise the effectiveness and acceptability of decision aids for critically ill patients and family members in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A systematic search of four electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant studies on the application of decision aids in the ICU, without publication date restriction, through March 2023. The methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley was used to guide the scoping review.

RESULTS

Fourteen papers were ultimately included in this review. However, only nine decision aids were available, and it is noteworthy that many of these studies focused on the iterative development and testing of individual decision aids. Among the included studies, 92% (n=13) were developed in North America, with a primary focus on goals of care and life-sustaining treatments. The summary of the effect of decision aid application revealed that the most common indicators were the level of knowledge and code status, and some promising signals disappeared in randomised trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of treatment decisions in the ICU exceeds the current capabilities of existing decision aids. There is a clear gap in decision aids that are tailored to different cultural contexts, highlighting the need to expand the scope of their application. In addition, rigorous quality control is very important for randomised controlled trial, and indicators for assessing the effectiveness of decision aids need to be further clarified.