Adjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer

Fluorescence-guided pancreatic surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Although fluorescence guidance during various surgical procedures has been shown to be safe and have possible better clinical outcomes than without the guidance, the use of fluorophores in pancreatic surgery is novel and not yet well described. This scoping review involved a systematic methodology of the currently available literature and aimed to illuminate the use of fluorophores in pancreatic surgery from a clinical view.

METHODS

The PRISMA and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used when appropriate and the following databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, The Cochrane Collection, and Web of Science. Human original articles and case reports were included. Bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the IDEAL framework was used for evaluation of surgical innovation.

RESULTS

A total of 5,565 search hits were screened, and 23 original articles and 24 case reports consisting of 754 patients met the inclusion criteria. The use of indocyanine green was both the most prominent and the most promising method for securing sufficient perfusion of neighboring organs, enhancing the detection and distinguishing of neuroendocrine tumors, and assisting in the identification of hepatic micrometastases.

CONCLUSION

The included studies were generally heterogenic, exploratory, and small. Indocyanine green was used in several ways, and it may add clinical value in different settings during pancreatic surgery. Tumor-targeted probes are a rapidly developing and promising field of research.

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and portal vein infusion chemotherapy followed by gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy improves the overall survival (OS) of patients with resected pancreatic cancer, its efficacy requires further improvement. This multicenter, phase II study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant portal vein infusion (PVI) chemotherapy followed by GEM therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and heparin (2000 IU/day) PVI chemotherapy were combined with systemic administration of mitomycin C (4 mg; days 6, 13, 20, and 27) and cisplatin (10 mg; days 7, 14, 21, and 28) for 4 weeks (PI4W), followed by GEM (1000 mg/m2; days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for 6 months). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) and the secondary endpoints were OS and treatment completion.

RESULTS

Between November 2010 and August 2013, 53 patients who underwent complete resection were enrolled, including 30, 20, and 3 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal and total pancreatectomies, respectively. In total, 51 (96.2%) patients underwent R0 resection, of whom 3, 2, 12, 35, 0, and 1 had stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III, and IV cancer, respectively, and 47 (88.7%) patients completed PI4W. The median RFS was 22.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years RFS: 64.9%, 38.1%, 38.1%, and 38.1%, respectively), whereas the median OS was 32.0 months (1-, 3-, 5, and 10 years OS:86.6%, 47.2%, 44.4%, and 44.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with PI4W followed by GEM for 6 months after surgery may be beneficial in patients undergoing curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy omission after pancreatic cancer resection: a French nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves the prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. However, previous studies have shown that a large proportion of patients do not receive or complete AC. This national study examined the risk factors for the omission or interruption of AC.

METHODS

Data of all patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PDAC in France between January 2012 and December 2017 were extracted from the French National Administrative Database. We considered "omission of adjuvant chemotherapy" (OAC) all patients who failed to receive any course of gemcitabine within 12 postoperative weeks and "interruption of AC" (IAC) was defined as less than 18 courses of AC.

RESULTS

A total of 11 599 patients were included in this study. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most common procedure (76.3%), and 31% of the patients experienced major postoperative complications. OACs and IACs affected 42% and 68% of the patients, respectively. Ultimately, only 18.6% of the cohort completed AC. Patients who underwent surgery in a high-volume centers were less affected by postoperative complications, with no impact on the likelihood of receiving AC. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 4, and major complications were associated with OAC (OR = 2.19; CI95%[1.79-2.68]; OR = 1.75; CI95%[1.41-2.18] and OR = 2.37; CI95%[2.15-2.62] respectively). Moreover, age ≥ 80 years and CCI 2-3 or ≥ 4 were also independent risk factors for IAC (OR = 1.54, CI95%[1.1-2.15]; OR = 1.43, CI95%[1.21-1.68]; OR = 1.47, CI95%[1.02-2.12], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Sequence surgery followed by chemotherapy is associated with a high dropout rate, especially in octogenarian and comorbid patients.

Practice Patterns and Survival in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas (PDAC) - Results from the Multicentre Indian Pancreatic & Periampullary Adenocarcinoma Project (MIPPAP) Study

BACKGROUND

There is limited data from India with regard to presentation, practice patterns and survivals in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs).

METHODS

The Multicentre Indian Pancreatic & Periampullary Adenocarcinoma Project (MIPPAP) included data from 8 major academic institutions across India and presents the outcomes in upfront resected PDACs from January 2015 to June 2019.

RESULTS

Of 288 patients, R0 resection was achieved in 81% and adjuvant therapy was administered in 75% of patients. With a median follow-up of 42 months (95% CI: 39-45), median DFS for the entire cohort was 39 months (95% CI: 25.4-52.5), and median overall survival (OS) was 45 months (95% CI: 32.3-57.7). A separate analysis was done in which patients were divided into 3 groups: (a) those with stage I and absent PNI (SI&PNI-), (b) those with either stage II/III OR presence of PNI (SII/III/PNI+), and (c) those with stage II/III AND presence of PNI (SII/III&PNI+). The DFS was significantly lesser in patients with SII/III&PNI+ (median 25, 95% CI: 14.1-35.9 months), compared to SII/III/PNI + (median 40, 95% CI: 24-55 months) and SI&PNI- (median, not reached) (p = 0.036)).

CONCLUSIONS

The MIPPAP study shows that resectable PDACs in India have survivals at par with previously published data. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 75% patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy does not seem to add to survival after R0 resection.

Comparison of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, S-1 and gemcitabine chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: a real-world study

Background

A survival benefit has been seen for both adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) and S-1 chemotherapy compared to gemcitabine (GEM) for resectable pancreatic cancer in the APACT (2019) and JASPAC01 trials (2016), respectively. However, supporting evidence regarding the effectiveness of AG or S-1 compared to gemcitabine in real-world clinical practice remains lacking.

Methods

Our study included all 246 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment and received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with AG, S-1, or GEM except for those meeting exclusion criteria (R2 resection, neoadjuvant therapy, or synchronous malignancy) at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 2015 to July 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

In total, 246 patients were included, of whom 54(22%) received adjuvant AG, 103(41%) received adjuvant S-1, and 89(37%) received adjuvant GEM. Adjuvant S-1 was associated with a prolonged OS compared to GEM (median OS S-1 vs GEM: 27.0 vs 20.0 months; HR: 0.65, P = .016) and a significantly prolonged RFS compared to GEM (median RFS S-1 vs GEM: 20.0 vs 8.2 months; HR: 0.58, P = .002). After adjusting for known prognostic factors in multivariate Cox regression analysis, this survival benefit persists and is consistent in most subgroups in our subgroup analysis. However, no statistically significant differences in OS or RFS were seen between patients treated with AG and patients treated with GEM.

Conclusions

In this retrospective real-world study, adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared to GEM while no differences in OS or RFS were observed for AG compared to GEM.

Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib alone and with PI3K/mTOR inhibitor LY3023414 or galunisertib versus chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are characterized by frequent cell cycle pathways aberrations. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, as monotherapy or in combination with PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor LY3023414 or TGFβ inhibitor galunisertib versus standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy in patients with pretreated metastatic PDAC.

METHODS

This Phase 2 open-label study enrolled patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed after 1-2 prior therapies. Patients were enrolled in a safety lead-in (abemaciclib plus galunisertib) followed by a 2-stage randomized design. Stage 1 randomization was planned 1:1:1:1 for abemaciclib, abemaciclib plus LY3023414, abemaciclib plus galunisertib, or SOC gemcitabine or capecitabine. Advancing to Stage 2 required a disease control rate (DCR) difference ≥0 in abemaciclib-containing arms versus SOC. Primary objectives for Stages 1 and 2 were DCR and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively. Secondary objectives included response rate, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients were enrolled. Abemaciclib plus galunisertib did not advance to Stage 1 for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy. Stage 1 DCR was 15.2% with abemaciclib monotherapy, 12.1% with abemaciclib plus LY3023414, and 36.4% with SOC. Median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.4-1.8), 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.3-1.9), and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.1-5.7), respectively. No arms advanced to Stage 2. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

In patients with pretreated metastatic PDAC, abemaciclib-based therapy did not improve DCRs or PFS compared with SOC chemotherapy. No treatment arms advanced to Stage 2. Abemaciclib remains investigational in patients with PDAC.

Distal Bile Duct Cancer: Radical (R0 > 1 mm) Resection Achieves Favorable Survival

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the outcome after resection for distal bile duct cancer (DBC) with focus on the impact of microscopic histopathological resection status R0 (>1 mm) versus R1 (≤1 mm) vs R1 (direct).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

DBC is a rare disease for which oncologic resection offers the only chance of cure.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for DBC were analyzed. Histopathological resection status was classified according to the Leeds protocol for pancreatic ductal adeno carcinoma (PDAC) (PDAC; R0 >1 mm margin clearance vs R1 ≤1 mm vs R1 direct margin involvement).

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for DBC. Microscopic complete tumor clearance (R0>1 mm) was achieved in 113 patients (58%). Median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 37 months (5- and 10-year OS rate: 40% and 31%, respectively). After R0 resection, median OS increased to 78 months with a 5-year OS rate of 52%. Negative prognostic factors were age >70 years ( P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.48), intraoperative blood loss >1000 mL ( P = 0.0009, HR 1.99), pN1 and pN2 status ( P = 0.0052 and P = 0.0006, HR 2.14 and 2.62, respectively) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score >II ( P = 0.0259, HR 1.61).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest European single-center study of surgical treatment for DBC and the first to investigate the prognostic impact of the revised PDAC resection status definition in DBC. The results show that this definition is valid in DBC and that "true" R0 resection (>1 mm) is a key factor for excellent survival. In contrast to PDAC, there was no survival difference between R1 (≤1 mm) and R1 (direct).

Long Noncoding RNA MIR600HG Binds to MicroRNA-125a-5p to Prevent Pancreatic Cancer Progression Via Mitochondrial Tumor Suppressor 1-Dependent Suppression of Extracellular Regulated Protein Kinases Signaling Pathway

OBJECTIVES

Significance of long noncoding RNAs in pancreatic cancer (PC) progression has been documented. Here, we identified a novel long noncoding RNA MIR600HG in PC and its underlying mechanism during PC progression.

METHODS

Through bioinformatics analysis, we selected MIR600HG, microRNA-125a-5p (miR-125a-5p), and mitochondrial tumor suppressor 1 (MTUS1) as objects with their expression patterns assayed in the collected PC tissues and PC cells. Pancreatic cancer cells were manipulated with ectopic expression and deficiency of MIR600HG, miR-125a-5p, and/or MTUS1 for assaying cell biological processes in vitro and tumorigenesis in vivo.

RESULTS

MIR600HG and MTUS1 levels were downregulated and miR-125a-5p was upregulated in PC tissues and cells. MIR600HG could bind to miR-125a-5p, while miR-125a-5p negatively targeted MTUS1. MIR600HG resulted in suppression in malignant properties of PCs. All these changes could be reversed by miR-125a-5p elevation. In addition, miR-125a-5p targeted MTUS1 to activate the extracellular regulated protein kinases signaling pathway. In vivo experiment also verified the inhibitory role of MIR600HG in PC.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, MIR600HG acts as an inhibitor for PC progression by upregulating miR-125a-5p-mediated MTUS1 through extracellular regulated protein kinases pathway.

Systemic therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs)-basis and current status

A major shift in the approach to the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) has been the recognition of the systemic nature of the disease even in clinically and radiologically limited disease stages. The recalcitrant nature of PDAC is intrinsically related to the lack of therapeutic targets and dense surrounding stroma that limits the activity of currently available chemotherapeutic options. However, research is increasingly focusing on intensifying systemic management options in PDAC, resulting in gradual improvements in survival. Currently effective chemotherapeutic regimens like modified 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-irinotecan-oxaliplatin and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel have improved outcomes in resectable and advanced PDAC. An increasing use of these regimens has also resulted in greater conversion of borderline resectable and locally advanced cancers to resection, though the most effective approach in this subgroup is yet to be identified. The current review presents an outline of the basic systemic nature of PDAC and current options of systemic therapy, predominantly chemotherapy .

Identify potential prognostic indicators and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is a kind of highly malignant tumor and lacks early diagnosis method and effective treatment. Tumor microenvironment (TME) is of great importance for the occurrence and development of PAAD. Thus, a comprehensive overview of genes and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TICs) related to TME dynamic changes conduce to develop novel therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators.

Methods: We used MAlignant Tumors using Expression data (ESTIMATE) algorithm to analyze the transcriptome RNA-seq data of 182 PAAD cases on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) platform. Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, COX regression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were carried out to get the hub genes related to the prognosis of PAAD patients. These core genes were validated in GEPIA. CXCL10 expression as a poor prognostic indicator was validated in GEO database. Finally, CIBERSORT algorithm was applied to understand the status of TICs.

Results: A total of 715 up-regulated differential expression genes (DEGs) and 57 down-regulated DEGs were found simultaneously in stromal and immune groups. These DEGs were mainly enriched in immune recognition, activation and response processes. CD4, CXCL12, CXCL10, CCL5 and CXCL9 were the top five core genes. Then, the validation of these genes showed that CD4, CXCL10, CXCL5, CXCL9 were up-regulated in PAAD. Among the core genes, CXCL10 had a negative correlation with the survival time of PAAD patients. CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells memory activated, macrophages M1 had positive correlation of CXCL10 expression, whereas regulatory T cells (Tregs), macrophages M0 and B cells memory had negative correlation.

Conclusion: We generated a series of genes related to TME with prognostic implications and TICs in PAAD, which have the potential to be novel immunotherapy targets and prognostic markers. The data showed that CXCL10 was favorable as a poor prognostic indicator in PAAD patients.

Curing pancreatic cancer

The distinct biology of pancreatic cancer with aggressive and early invasive tumor cells, a tumor promoting microenvironment, late diagnosis, and high therapy resistance poses major challenges on clinicians, researchers, and patients. In current clinical practice, a curative approach for pancreatic cancer can only be offered to a minority of patients and even for those patients, the long-term outcome is grim. This bitter combination will eventually let pancreatic cancer rise to the second leading cause of cancer-related mortalities. With surgery being the only curative option, complete tumor resection still remains the center of pancreatic cancer treatment. In recent years, new developments in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment have emerged. Together with improved perioperative care including complication management, an increasing number of patients have become eligible for tumor resection. Basic research aims to further increase these numbers by new methods of early detection, better tumor modelling and personalized treatment options. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on clinical and biologic features, surgical and non-surgical treatment options, and the improved collaboration of clinicians and basic researchers in pancreatic cancer that will hopefully result in more successful ways of curing pancreatic cancer.

A Novel Validated Recurrence Stratification System Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics to Guide Surveillance After Resection of Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Despite the heterogeneous biology of pancreatic cancer, similar surveillance schemas have been used. Identifying the high recurrence risk population and conducting prompt intervention may improve prognosis and prolong overall survival.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six resectable pancreatic cancer patients who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT from January 2013 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were categorized into a training cohort (n = 109) and a validation cohort (n = 47). LIFEx software was used to extract radiomic features from PET/CT. The risk stratification system was based on predictive factors for recurrence, and the index of prediction accuracy was used to reflect both the discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

Overall, seven risk factors comprising the rad-score and clinical variables that were significantly correlated with relapse were incorporated into the final risk stratification system. The 1-year recurrence-free survival differed significantly among the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (85.5, 24.0, and 9.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The C-index of the risk stratification system in the development cohort was 0.890 (95% CI, 0.835-0.945).

CONCLUSION

The 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomic features and clinicopathological factors demonstrated good performance in predicting recurrence after pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer patients, providing a strong recommendation for an adequate adjuvant therapy course in all patients. The high-risk recurrence population should proceed with closer follow-up in a clinical setting.

Municipality and Adjusted Gross Income Influence Outcome of Patients Diagnosed with Pancreatic Cancer in a Newly Developed Cancer Center in Mercer County New Jersey, USA, a Single Center Study

Socioeconomic status (SES) correlates directly to ZIP code. Mercer County is not atypical as a collection of a dozen municipalities with a suburban/metropolitan population of 370,430 in the immediate vicinity of a major medical center. The purpose of this study for Mercer County, New Jersey, USA is to determine whether a patient's ZIP code is related to the outlook of pancreatic cancer defined as staging at diagnosis, prevalence, overall survival, type of insurance, and recurrence. Our hypothesis was that specific variables such as socio-economic status or race could be linked to the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer. We interrogated a convenience sample from our cancer center registry and obtained 479 subjects diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 1998-2018. We selected 339 subjects by ZIP code, representing the plurality of the cases in our catchment area. The outcome variable was overall survival; predictor variables were socio-economic status (SES), recurrence, insurance, type of treatment, gender, cancer stage, age, and race. We converted ZIP code to municipality and culled data using adjusted gross income (AGI, FY 2017). Comparative statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests for nominal and ordinal variables, and a two-way ANOVA test was used for continuous variables; the p-value was set at 0.05. Our analysis confirmed that overall survival was significantly higher for Whites and for individuals who live in a municipality with a high SES. Tumor stage at the time of diagnosis was not different among race and SES; however, statistically significant differences for race or SES existed in the type of treatment received, with disparities found in those who received radiation therapy and surgery but not chemotherapy. The data may point to a lack of access to specific care modalities that subsequently may lead to lower survival in an underserved population. Access to care, optimal nutritional status, overall fitness, and co-morbidities could play a major role and confound the results. Our study suggests that low SES has a negative impact on overall pancreatic cancer survival. Surgery for pancreatic cancer should be appropriately decentralized to those community cancer centers that possess the expertise and the infrastructure to carry out specialized treatments regardless of race, ethnicity, SES, and insurance.

Adjuvant Pancreatic Cancer Management: Towards New Perspectives in 2021

Adjuvant chemotherapy is currently used in all patients with resected pancreatic cancer who are able to begin treatment within 3 months after surgery. Since the recent publication of the PRODIGE 24 trial results, modified FOLFIRINOX has become the standard-of-care in the non-Asian population with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma following surgery. Nevertheless, there is still a risk of toxicity, and feasibility may be limited in heavily pre-treated patients. In more frail patients, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy remains a suitable option, for example gemcitabine or 5FU in monotherapy. In Asia, although S1-based chemotherapy is the standard of care it is not readily available outside Asia and data are lacking in non-Asiatic patients. In patients in whom resection is not initially possible, intensified schemes such as FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel have been confirmed as options to enhance the response rate and resectability, promoting research in adjuvant therapy. In particular, should oncologists prescribe adjuvant treatment after a long sequence of chemotherapy +/- chemoradiotherapy and surgery? Should oncologists consider the response rate, the R0 resection rate alone, or the initial chemotherapy regimen? And finally, should they take into consideration the duration of the entire sequence, or the presence of limited toxicities of induction treatment? The aim of this review is to summarize adjuvant management of resected pancreatic cancer and to raise current and future concerns, especially the need for biomarkers and the best holistic care for patients.

A new prognosis prediction model combining TNM stage with MAP2K4 and JNK in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MAP2K4) is a tumor suppressor in many cancers. However, its roles and action mechanisms in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unclear. Here, we analyzed MAP2K4 and its downstream kinases (c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38) using immunohistochemical staining and their prognostic significances using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in our PDAC cohort. Then, we validated MAP2K4/JNK/p38 mRNA levels and prognostic significances using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Finally, we evaluated the effects of MAP2K4 on the proliferation and invasion of PDAC cells. MAP2K4, JNK, and p38 proteins were expressed in 97.3 % (72/74), 95.6 % (65/68), and 88.6 % (62/70) of the samples, respectively, and their levels in tumor tissues were significantly higher than those in normal ducts. MAP2K4 protein expression was lower in male patients (p = 0.028). In our PDAC cohort, advanced TNM stage, low MAP2K4, and high JNK protein levels were significant prognostic factors for poor overall survival (OS) based on a univariate survival analysis (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, and p = 0.004, respectively). N stage and MAP2K4 and JNK protein levels were independent prognostic factors for OS based on multivariate analysis. We then built a prognosis prediction nomogram combining the standard TNM staging system with MAP2K4 and JNK expression that had a Harrell's C-index of 0.645. The new prognosis prediction model effectively stratified the resected patients with PDAC, from both our cohort and TCGA database, into low- and high-risk groups. Finally, MAP2K4 overexpression inhibited pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration in vitro. This study shows that reduced protein and mRNA levels of MAP2K4 found in PDAC patients, coupled to in vitro effects observed, support the tumor suppressor role of MAP2K4 in PDAC. Importantly, combining MAP2K4 and JNK expression with the TNM staging system results in a better prediction of postoperative survival of patients with PDAC.

The Ras-ERK signaling pathway regulates acetylated activating transcription factor 2 via p300 in pancreatic cancer cells

Background

Activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) regulates the expression of downstream target genes and is phosphorylated by the Ras-extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. Acetylation of ATF2 is necessary for this type of regulation. However, the molecular mechanism by which the Ras-ERK pathway mediates the regulation of acetylated ATF2 is unknown. This study investigates the mechanism of Ras-ERK pathway-mediated regulation of acetylated ATF2 in maintaining the characteristic phenotype of pancreatic cancer cells.

Methods

This study was carried out using ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 pancreatic cancer cell lines transfected with the double mutant Ras^G12V/T35S. The levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 were measured to establish the activated Ras-ERK pathway. The regulation of acetylated ATF2 was examined by detecting the protein level using western blotting, and the effects on cancer cell phenotype were measured using cell viability, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis assays. Also, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used to measure the effect on respective downstream target genes.

Results

The results showed that Ras^G12V/T35S reduced the level of acetylated ATF2 in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells. Compared to wild-type ATF2, the mutant ATF2^K357Q (which mimics the irreversible acetylated form of ATF2) reduced the cancer cell phenotype and showed decreased enrichment on target genes upon transfection with Ras. Moreover, the level of acetylated ATF2 was regulated by the degradation of p300 through E3 ubiquitin ligase mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2).

Conclusions

Activation of the Ras-ERK pathway regulates acetylated ATF2 through degradation of p300 via a proteasome-dependent pathway, which alters the transcription of downstream target genes responsible for the cancer cell phenotype.

Comprehensive analysis of gene regulation network and immune signatures of prognostic biomarker YAP1 in pancreatic cancer

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most common digestive malignancy, with severe cancer-related death and disease burden. Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) has been reported to be involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of several cancers, thus leading to poor prognosis of patients. However, the relationship between YAP1 and immune microenvironment in PC deserve more scrutiny.

Methods: GEPIA, OncoLnc, PROGgeneV2 and HPA database were utilized to analyze the expression (transcriptome and protein levels) and overall survival of YAP1 in PC. Then, we evaluated the risk factors associated with overall survival based on public data from TCGA-PAAD via Cox regression. Besides, LinkedOmics was utilized to identify co-expression genes and the potential regulation network of YAP1. Furthermore, we explored the relationship between YAP1 and immune infiltration using CIBERSORT algorithm and GEPIA database.

Results: The age, lymph node metastasis status and up-regulated YAP1 expression have been proved to be independent prognostic factors for poor prognosis. The functions of YAP1 and co-expression genes were mainly involved in the angiogenesis, immune response-regulating signaling pathway, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. Specifically, increased YAP1 expression was significantly correlated with immune infiltrating levels of resting CD4⁺T cells.

Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence of the immune regulatory role of YAP1 in PC and help elucidate the role of YAP1 in carcinogenesis as well.

Is Surgery-first Still a Reasonable Option in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has risen rapidly. By 2030, it is likely to be the second most prevalent cause of death by cancer, following cancer of the lung. Unfortunately, most patients present with advanced disease. In fact, only 20% of patients are candidates for surgery. More research is needed to find dependable treatment options for this disease. Although we wait for more effective treatments to be developed, we continue using chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery-all with less than optimal outcomes. There is a debate about using chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting and counter-debate about better outcomes in the adjuvant settings. In the neoadjuvant setting, not everyone is able to make it to surgery; conversely, in the adjuvant setting, not everyone is able to make it to chemotherapy. Drop-out data after surgery are widely available, but similar drop-out rates after neoadjuvant treatment are not widely published. Here, we will analyze the literature to better understand the treatment strategies and outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We argue in favor of an upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy strategy for better outcomes and patient quality of life.

The GALNT14 Genotype Predicts Postoperative Outcome of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is notorious for its poor prognosis. The current mainstay of treatment for PDA is surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is difficult to predict the post-operative outcome because of the lack of reliable markers. The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase14 (GALNT14) has been proven to predict the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response to chemotherapy in various types of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, its role in PDA has not been studied. This study aims to investigate whether the GALNT14 SNP genotype can be a prognostic marker for PDA. A cohort of one hundred and three PDA patients having received surgical resection were retrospectively enrolled. GALNT14 genotypes and the clinicopathological parameters were correlated with postoperative prognosis. The genotype analysis revealed that 19.4%, 60.2% and 20.4% of patients had the GALNT14 "TT", "TG" and "GG" genotypes, respectively. The patients with the "GG" genotype had a mean OS time of 37.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.2-56.1) and those with the "non-GG" genotype had a mean OS time of 16.1 months (95% CI: 13.1-19.2). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the "GG" genotype had a significantly better OS compared to the "non-GG" genotype (p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the "GG" and "non-GG" genotypes in PFS (p = 0.172). The baseline characteristics between patients with the "GG" and "non-GG" genotypes were compared, and no significant difference was found. Univariate followed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models demonstrated the GALNT14 "GG" genotype, negative resection margin, and locoregional disease as independent predictors for favorable OS (p = 0.003, p = 0.037, p = 0.021, respectively). Sensitivity analysis was performed in each subgroup to examine the relationship of GALNT14 with different clinicopathological variables and no heterogeneity was found. The GALNT14 "GG" genotype is associated with favorable survival outcome, especially OS, in patients with resected PDA and could serve as a prognostic marker.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: retrospective real-life data

BACKGROUND

The recommendation for postoperative chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is based on prospective randomized trials. However, patients included in clinical trials do not often reflect the overall patient population treated in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreas resection for PDAC between 2001 and 2013 was performed. Follow-up data from oncologists, general practitioners, or hospital patient files were available for 92% of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 251 patients were included in our analysis. Chemotherapy was recommended for 223 patients, but 86 patients did not follow the recommendation. The application of the recommended chemotherapy, consisting of 6 cycles of gemcitabine, was only applied to 45 patients. Forty patients received the recommended number of cycles with dose reduction or prolonged intervals between cycles, and adjuvant chemotherapy was terminated prior to the intended completion of all 6 cycles in 54 patients. Survival of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy was increased compared to that of patients without chemotherapy (with recurrence 25.6 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.001, and without recurrence 27.4 vs. 14.3 months, p <  0.001). Terminating chemotherapy prior to completion (p = 0.009) as well as a lower number of chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.026) was associated with a decreased survival.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall and disease-free survival after curative pancreatic resection, but only a small fraction of patients completes the recommended 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our data indicates that performance status of patients after pancreas resections for PDAC requires not only highly biologically active but also well-tolerated adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Irinotecan: 25 years of cancer treatment

Twenty-five years ago, the cytotoxic drug irinotecan (IRT) was first approved in Japan for the treatment of cancer. For more than two decades, the IRT prodrug has largely contributed to the treatment of solid tumors worldwide. Nowadays, this camptothecin derivative targeting topoisomerase 1 remains largely used in combination regimen, like FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX, to treat metastatic or advanced solid tumors, such as colon, gastric and pancreatic cancers and others. This review highlights recent discoveries in the field of IRT and its derivatives, including analogues of the active metabolite SN38 (such as FL118), the recently approved liposomal form Nal-IRI and SN38-based immuno-conjugates currently in development (such as sacituzumab govitecan). New information about the IRT mechanism of action are presented, including the discovery of a new protein target, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein FUBP1. Significant progress has been made also to better understand and manage the main limiting toxicities of IRT, chiefly neutropenia and diarrhea. The role of drug-induced inflammation and dysbiosis is underlined and strategies to limit the intestinal toxicity of IRT are discussed (use of β-glucuronidase inhibitors, plant extracts, probiotics). The detailed knowledge of the metabolism of IRT has enabled the identification of potential biomarkers to guide patient selection and to limit drug-induced toxicities, but no robust IRT-specific therapeutic biomarker has been approved yet. IRT is a versatile chemotherapeutic agent which combines well with a variety of anticancer drugs. It offers a large range of drug combinations with cytotoxic agents, targeted products and immuno-active biotherapeutics, to treat a variety of advanced solid carcinoma, sarcoma and cancers with progressive central nervous system diseases. A quarter of century after its first launch, IRT remains an essential anticancer drug, largely prescribed, useful to many patients and scientifically inspiring.