Esophageal carcinoma: are modern targeted therapies shaking the rock?

Rapamycin suppresses the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway by targeting SIRT1 in esophageal cancer

Rapamycin, a secondary metabolite produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus, is known for its pharmacological effects, especially antitumor and immunosuppressive activities. However, the antitumoral effects of rapamycin in human esophageal cancer (EC) are still poorly understood. To investigate the potential of rapamycin in EC treatment, sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) mRNA expression was quantified in the tissue of patients with EC or in EC cell lines using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. The protein levels of SIRT1 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR were measured via western blotting. Furthermore, cell viability, migration and invasion were investigated by Cell Counting Kit-8, wound healing and Transwell assays, respectively. The present results suggested that SIRT1 expression was upregulated in EC. In vitro, the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on cell viability in EC was strengthened or weakened after small interfering (si)-SIRT1 or pcDNA3.1/SIRT1 transfection. Furthermore, SIRT1 rescued the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on the migration and invasion of EC cells. In vivo, si-SIRT1 or SIRT1 overexpression in mice could enhance or rescue the inhibitory effects of rapamycin on tumor growth. In addition, SIRT1 transfection rescued the decreased level of phosphorylated (p)-PI3K, p-AKT and p-mTOR induced by rapamycin treatment. Taken together, the present results suggested that rapamycin suppressed the cell viability, migration, invasion and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in EC by negatively regulating SIRT1.

CAIX furthers tumour progression in the hypoxic tumour microenvironment of esophageal carcinoma and is a possible therapeutic target

The hypoxic tumour microenvironment of solid tumours represents an important starting point for modulating progression and metastatic spread. Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a known HIF-1α-dependent key player in maintaining cell pH conditions under hypoxia. We show that CAIX is strongly expressed in esophageal carcinoma tissues. We hypothesize that a moderate CAIX expression facilitates metastases and thereby worsens prognosis. Selective inhibition of CAIX by specific CAIX inhibitors and a CAIX knockdown effectively inhibit proliferation and migration in vitro. In the orthotopic esophageal carcinoma model, the humanized HER2 antibody trastuzumab down-regulates CAIX, possibly through CAIX’s linkage with HER2 in the hypoxic microenvironment. Our results show CAIX to be an essential part of the tumour microenvironment and a possible master regulator of tumour progression. This makes CAIX a highly effective and feasible therapeutic target for selective cancer treatment.

Current status of proteomics of esophageal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Identifying suitable biomarkers for early diagnosis as well as predicting lymph node metastasis, prognosis and the therapeutic response of EC is essential for the effective and efficient management for EC. There is an urgent need to develop effective, novel approaches for patients who do not respond to conventional treatment. Areas covered: EC is characterized by the presence of two main histological types such as squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, which differ in their response to treatments and prognosis. Thus, this review describes the latest research into biomarkers and novel treatment targets generated by cancer proteomics for the two main histological types. Finally, the main difficulties facing the translation of biomarkers and novel treatment targets into the clinical settings are discussed. Expert commentary: EC proteomics have provided useful results and, after their validation, novel clinical tools should be developed to improve the clinical outcomes for EC patients.

Tumor profiling of gastric and esophageal carcinoma reveal different treatment options

BACKGROUND

NCCN states that chemotherapies for advanced esophageal and gastric cancers may be used interchangeably. Biomarkers from gastroesophageal cancer patients were interrogated to identify actionable alterations with therapeutic implications.

METHODS

666 gastric and 640 esophageal cancer cases referred to Caris Life Sciences between 2009 thru 2013 were evaluated. Specific testing was performed, which included a combination of sequencing (Sanger, NGS) and protein expression (IHC).

RESULTS

In the complete cohort (n = 1306), 30 of 45 genes tested harbored mutations; highest rates were seen in TP53 (54%), APC (10%), SMAD4 (5.9%), KRAS (5.9%), and PIK3CA (5.1%). IHC of TOP2A was high in 76% of cases, TOPO1 in 51% and SPARC in 25%; low IHC of ERCC1 was seen in 65%, RRM1 in 62%, TS in 61% and MGMT in 45%, indicating potential benefit from epirubicin, irinotecan, nab-paclitaxel, platinum-based agents, gemcitabine, 5FU/capecitabine and temozolomide, respectively. In the HER2+ cohort (n = 88), 50% of patients demonstrated possible benefit from a combination of trastuzumab with 5FU/capecitabine based on concurrent low TS, 53% with irinotecan (high TOPO1), 63% with cisplatin (low ERCC1) and 55% with gemcitabine (low RRM1). Subgroup analysis by tumor origin demonstrated significant differences in actionable biomarker profiles with HER2 (13% vs. 4.6%), SPARC (34% vs. 15%), TOP2A (86% vs. 67%), and TOPO1 (55% vs. 46%) in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma cases respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive multiplatform biomarker analysis suggested significant biomarker differences between gastric and esophageal cancers. These results can assist in the development of future clinical trials.

Current advances in esophageal cancer proteomics

We review the current status of proteomics for esophageal cancer (EC) from a clinician's viewpoint. The ultimate goal of cancer proteomics is the improvement of clinical outcome. The proteome as a functional translation of the genome is a straightforward representation of genomic mechanisms that trigger carcinogenesis. Cancer proteomics has identified the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and tumor progression, detected biomarker candidates for early diagnosis, and provided novel therapeutic targets for personalized treatments. Our review focuses on three major topics in EC proteomics: diagnostics, treatment, and molecular mechanisms. We discuss the major histological differences between EC types, i.e., esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, and evaluate the clinical significance of published proteomics studies, including promising diagnostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets, which should be further validated prior to launching clinical trials. Multi-disciplinary collaborations between basic scientists, clinicians, and pathologists should be established for inter-institutional validation. In conclusion, EC proteomics has provided significant results, which after thorough validation, should lead to the development of novel clinical tools and improvement of the clinical outcome for esophageal cancer patients. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Medical Proteomics.

Establishment and characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patient-derived xenograft mouse models for preclinical drug discovery

The purpose of this study was to establish and characterize patient-derived esophageal squamous cell carcinoma xenograft (PDECX) mice for utilization in antitumor drug discovery. A total of 96 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues from Chinese patients were transplanted subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice. Histology, EGFR, K-ras, B-raf, and PIK3CA mutations, and HER2 gene amplifications were analyzed in both patient tumors and mouse xenograft tissues using immunohistochemistry, mutant-enriched liquid chip sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization assays, respectively. Furthermore, in vivo efficacy studies using five PDECX mice harboring a variety of genetic aberrations were performed using the chemotherapy agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin. Thirty-seven PDECX mouse models were successfully established in immunodeficient mice. Pathological analysis revealed similar histological architecture and degrees of differentiation between patient ESCC and xenografted tumors. No mutations were identified in EGFR, K-ras, and B-raf genes in either xenograft models or patient ESCC tissues. In contrast, PIK3CA gene mutations were detected in 12.5% (12/96) ESCC patients and 18.9% (7/37) PDECX models. Interestingly, patient ESCC tissues exhibiting HER2 overexpression or gene amplification were unable to survive in immunodeficient mice. Further analysis showed that PDECX models carrying HER2 2+ expression had no response to 5-FU/cisplatin, compared with HER2-negative models. In conclusion, a panel of PDECX mouse models, which include PIK3CA mutant and HER2-positive models, was established and characterized thus mimicking the current clinical genetic setting of esophageal carcinoma. The sensitivity of HER2-negative ESCC models to chemotherapy supports stratification approaches in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma patients and warrants further investigation of the impact of PI3KCA on treatment response.