1
|
Zamani-Siahkali N, Mirshahvalad SA, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Diagnostic Performance of [ 18F]F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non-Ophthalmic Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of More Than 10,000 Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:215. [PMID: 38201642 PMCID: PMC10778455 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
We described the diagnostic performance of [18F]F-FDG-PET in malignant melanoma by conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. The study was designed following PRISMA-DTA. Original articles with adequate crude data for meta-analytic calculations that evaluated [18F]F-FDG-PET and compared it with a valid reference standard were considered eligible. The pooled measurements were calculated based on the data level (patient/lesion-based). Regarding sub-groups, diagnostic performances were calculated for local, regional and distant involvement. The bivariate model was employed to calculate sensitivity and specificity. The initial search resulted in 6678 studies. Finally, 100 entered the meta-analysis, containing 82 patient-based (10,403 patients) and 32 lesion-based (6188 lesions) datasets. At patient level, overall, [18F]F-FDG-PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% (95%CI: 73-87%) and 92% (95%CI: 90-94%), respectively. To detect regional lymph node metastasis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95%CI: 40-72%) and 97% (95%CI: 94-99%), respectively. To detect distant metastasis, they were 88% (95%CI: 81-93%) and 94% (95%CI: 91-96%), respectively. At lesion level, [18F]F-FDG-PET had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 70% (95%CI: 57-80%) and 94% (95%CI: 88-97%), respectively. Thus, [18F]F-FDG-PET is a valuable diagnostic modality for melanoma assessment. It was accurate in various clinical scenarios. However, despite its high specificity, it showed low sensitivity in detecting regional lymph node metastasis and could not replace lymph node biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazanin Zamani-Siahkali
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (N.Z.-S.); (C.P.); (M.B.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1461884513, Iran
| | - Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (N.Z.-S.); (C.P.); (M.B.)
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
| | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (N.Z.-S.); (C.P.); (M.B.)
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (N.Z.-S.); (C.P.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnston L, Starkey S, Mukovozov I, Robertson L, Petrella T, Alhusayen R. Surveillance After a Previous Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Melanoma Follow-Up Guidelines. J Cutan Med Surg 2023; 27:516-525. [PMID: 37489919 PMCID: PMC10617001 DOI: 10.1177/12034754231188434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cutaneous melanoma accounts for more than 70% of all skin cancer deaths. Follow-up surveillance is an integral part of melanoma patient care, to facilitate early detection of recurrences and subsequent primary melanomas. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of recently published melanoma surveillance guidelines from regional and national melanoma working groups. METHODS A systematic search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and Embase was conducted in September 2022 and was limited to publications from 2010 or later. RESULTS A total of 1047 articles were retrieved, and after abstract and full text review, 26 articles from 19 different organizations met inclusion criteria. Life-long annual skin surveillance with a physician was recommended by 53% (9/17) of guidelines. Routine laboratory investigations were recommended by 7/19 guidelines. Regional lymph node ultrasound was recommended by 9/16 guidelines, most often in stage IB or higher, and was optional in 7/16 for patients who met specific criteria. Surveillance with PET-CT or CT and MRI was recommended by 15 and 11 guidelines, respectively, most commonly in stage IIC or higher, with a variable frequency and total duration. Five out of 9 guidelines indicated a preference for skin surveillance to be completed with a dermatologist. CONCLUSION Guidelines were highly variable for many aspects of melanoma surveillance, which may be partly attributed to regional differences in healthcare workforce distribution and availability of imaging technologies. Further high-level studies are recommended to provide more evidence on the most effective clinical and imaging follow-up surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Johnston
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Samantha Starkey
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ilya Mukovozov
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lynne Robertson
- Division of Dermatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Teresa Petrella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raed Alhusayen
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Helvind NM, Weitemeyer MBM, Chakera AH, Hendel HW, Ellebæk E, Svane IM, Kjærskov MW, Bojesen S, Skyum H, Petersen SK, Bastholt L, Johansen C, Bidstrup PE, Hölmich LR. Earlier Recurrence Detection Using Routine FDG PET-CT Scans in Surveillance of Stage IIB to IIID Melanoma: A National Cohort Study of 1480 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2377-2388. [PMID: 36752970 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13034-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of routine imaging in melanoma surveillance is unknown. In 2016, Denmark was the first country in the world to implement routine imaging with positron emission tomography-computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET-CT) in a nationwide, population-based surveillance program. This study aimed to determine the impact of surveillance with routine FDG PET-CT on hazard, cumulative incidence, and absolute risk of overall, locoregional, and distant recurrence detection in patients with stage IIB to IIID cutaneous melanoma. METHODS This retrospective, population-based, nationwide cohort study used prospectively collected data from five national health registries to compare hazard, cumulative incidence, and absolute risk of recurrence in patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2008-2010 (cohort 1, followed with clinical examinations) and patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2016-2017 (cohort 2, followed with clinical examinations and routine FDG PET-CT at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months). RESULTS The study included 1480 patients with stage IIB to IIID cutaneous melanoma. Cumulative incidences of overall and distant recurrence were higher in cohort 2, with a peak difference at three years (32.3 % vs 27.5 % and 25.8 % vs. 18.5 %, respectively). The hazard of recurrence was higher in cohort 2 during the first two years, with hazard rates for overall and distant recurrence of 1.16 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.44) and 1.51 (95 % CI, 1.16-1.96), respectively. The patterns persisted in absolute risk estimates. CONCLUSIONS Patients with stage IIB to IIID melanoma followed with routine FDG PET-CT had a 51 % increased hazard of distant recurrence detection within the first two years of surveillance. Future studies must determine whether this earlier recurrence detection translates into improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel Maria Helvind
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
| | | | - Annette Hougaard Chakera
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Helle Westergren Hendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Eva Ellebæk
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital: Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Sophie Bojesen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Helle Skyum
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- CASTLE-Cancer Late Effect Research, Center for Surgery and Cancer, Oncology Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan MK, Adler NR, Wolfe R, Pan Y, Chamberlain A, Kelly J, Yap K, Voskoboynik M, Haydon A, Shackleton M, Mar VJ. The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel K. Yan
- Victorian Melanoma Service Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Nikki R. Adler
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Yan Pan
- Victorian Melanoma Service Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Alexander Chamberlain
- Victorian Melanoma Service Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - John Kelly
- Victorian Melanoma Service Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Kenneth Yap
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Mark Voskoboynik
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Andrew Haydon
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Mark Shackleton
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Victoria J. Mar
- Victorian Melanoma Service Alfred Health Melbourne Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1515-1523. [PMID: 35349041 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02822-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In spite of the good prognosis of patients with early-stage melanoma, there is a substantial proportion of them that develop local or distant relapses. With the introduction of targeted and immune therapies for advanced melanoma, including at the adjuvant setting, early detection of recurrent melanoma and/or second primary lesions is crucial to improve clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack of universal guidelines regarding both frequency of surveillance visits and diagnostic imaging and/or laboratory evaluations. In this article, a multidisciplinary expert panel recommends, after careful review of relevant data in the field, a consensus- and experience-based follow-up strategy for melanoma patients, taking into account prognostic factors and biomarkers and the high-risk periods and patterns of recurrence in each (sub) stage of the disease. Apart from the surveillance intensity, healthcare professionals should focus on patients' education to perform regular self-examinations of the skin and palpation of lymph nodes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Newcomer K, Robbins KJ, Perone J, Hinojosa FL, Chen D, Jones S, Kaufman CK, Weiser R, Fields RC, Tyler DS. Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101030. [PMID: 35033317 PMCID: PMC9798450 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Newcomer
- Department of Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Jennifer Perone
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - David Chen
- e. Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Susan Jones
- f. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Roi Weiser
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wright CL, Miller ED, Contreras C, Knopp MV. Precision Nuclear Medicine: The Evolving Role of PET in Melanoma. Radiol Clin North Am 2021; 59:755-772. [PMID: 34392917 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The clinical management of melanoma patients has been rapidly evolving with the introduction of new targeted immuno-oncology (IO) therapeutics. The current diagnostic paradigms for melanoma patients begins with the histopathologic confirmation of melanoma, initial staging of disease burden with imaging and surgical approaches, treatment monitoring during systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy or IO therapeutics, restaging after completion of adjuvant systemic, surgical, and/or external radiation therapy, and the detection of recurrent malignancy/metastatic disease following therapy. New and evolving imaging approaches with positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging technologies, imaging methodologies, image reconstruction, and image analytics will likely continue to improve tumor detection, tumor characterization, and diagnostic confidence, enabling novel precision nuclear medicine practices for managing melanoma patients. This review will examine current concepts and challenges with existing PET imaging diagnostics for melanoma patients and introduce exciting new opportunities for PET in the current era of IO therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadwick L Wright
- Department of Radiology, Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 460, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Avenue, 2nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Carlo Contreras
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2050 Kenny Road, Tower 4th Floor, Columbus, OH 43221, USA
| | - Michael V Knopp
- Department of Radiology, Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 460, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Helvind NM, Aros Mardones CA, Hölmich LR, Hendel HW, Bidstrup PE, Sørensen JA, Chakera AH. Routine PET-CT scans provide early and accurate recurrence detection in asymptomatic stage IIB-III melanoma patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3020-3027. [PMID: 34120809 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of routine imaging with 18F-FDG PET-CT (PET-CT) in melanoma surveillance is debated and evidence of its diagnostic value and yield in asymptomatic patients is limited. Denmark introduced nationwide routine surveillance with PET-CT in high-risk patients in 2016. The aim of this study was to examine the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, numbers-needed-to-scan and clinical impact of routine PET-CT in the surveillance of asymptomatic stage IIB-III melanoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was retrieved from the population-based Danish Melanoma Database and patient records. All patients diagnosed with stage IIB-III melanoma at two University Hospitals in 2016 and 2017 were included. Patients underwent surveillance with clinical examinations and PET-CT scans at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. RESULTS In 138 patients, 243 routine PET-CTs were performed within a median follow-up time of 17.7 months. Routine PET-CT detected recurrence at least once in 25 patients (18.1%), including distant recurrence in 19 patients (13.8%). Stage IIB patients had the lowest recurrence rate (11.1%). Numbers-needed-to-scan to detect one distant recurrence was 12.8 patients and median time-to-recurrence was 6.8 months. Sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 94.7% and negative and positive predictive values were 100% and 74.4%, respectively. False positive findings prompted 22 additional investigations (of which ten invasive) in 17 patients (12.3%). CONCLUSION Routine PET-CT has a high sensitivity and specificity when used in high-risk melanoma surveillance. Time-to-recurrence and stage-specific recurrence rates indicate high gain of early routine imaging at six months especially for stage IIC and III patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel Maria Helvind
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
| | - Catalina Aurora Aros Mardones
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
| | - Helle Westergren Hendel
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Pernille Envold Bidstrup
- Psychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society's Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Jens Ahm Sørensen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Annette Hougaard Chakera
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Broman KK, Hughes T, Dossett L, Sun J, Kirichenko D, Carr MJ, Sharma A, Bartlett EK, Nijhuis AAG, Thompson JF, Hieken TJ, Kottschade L, Downs J, Gyorki DE, Stahlie E, van Akkooi A, Ollila DW, Frank J, Song Y, Karakousis G, Moncrieff M, Nobes J, Vetto J, Han D, Farma JM, Deneve JL, Fleming MD, Perez MC, Lowe MC, Olofsson Bagge R, Mattsson J, Lee AY, Berman RS, Chai H, Kroon HM, Teras J, Teras RM, Farrow NE, Beasley G, Hui JYC, Been L, Kruijff S, Kim Y, Naqvi SMH, Sarnaik AA, Sondak VK, Zager JS. Active surveillance of patients who have sentinel node positive melanoma: An international, multi-institution evaluation of adoption and early outcomes after the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-2). Cancer 2021; 127:2251-2261. [PMID: 33826754 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive cutaneous melanoma, the Second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy trial demonstrated equivalent disease-specific survival (DSS) with active surveillance using nodal ultrasound versus completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Adoption and outcomes of active surveillance in clinical practice and in adjuvant therapy recipients are unknown. METHODS In a retrospective cohort of SLN-positive adults treated at 21 institutions in Australia, Europe, and the United States from June 2017 to November 2019, the authors evaluated the impact of active surveillance and adjuvant therapy on all-site recurrence-free survival (RFS), isolated nodal RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and DSS using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Among 6347 SLN biopsies, 1154 (18%) were positive and had initial negative distant staging. In total, 965 patients (84%) received active surveillance, 189 (16%) underwent CLND. Four hundred thirty-nine patients received adjuvant therapy (surveillance, 38%; CLND, 39%), with the majority (83%) receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. After a median follow-up of 11 months, 220 patients developed recurrent disease (surveillance, 19%; CLND, 22%), and 24 died of melanoma (surveillance, 2%; CLND, 4%). Sixty-eight patients had an isolated nodal recurrence (surveillance, 6%; CLND, 4%). In patients who received adjuvant treatment without undergoing prior CLND, all isolated nodal recurrences were resectable. On risk-adjusted multivariable analyses, CLND was associated with improved isolated nodal RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.88), but not all-site RFS (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-1.02). Adjuvant therapy improved all-site RFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.47-0.57). DSS and DMFS did not differ by nodal management or adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS Active surveillance has been adopted for most SLN-positive patients. At initial assessment, real-world outcomes align with randomized trial findings, including in adjuvant therapy recipients. LAY SUMMARY For patients with melanoma of the skin and microscopic spread to lymph nodes, monitoring with ultrasound is an alternative to surgically removing the remaining lymph nodes. The authors studied adoption and real-world outcomes of ultrasound monitoring in over 1000 patients treated at 21 centers worldwide, finding that most patients now have ultrasounds instead of surgery. Although slightly more patients have cancer return in the lymph nodes with this strategy, typically, it can be removed with delayed surgery. Compared with up-front surgery, ultrasound monitoring results in the same overall risk of melanoma coming back at any location or of dying from melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy Kummerow Broman
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Tasha Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lesly Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Dennis Kirichenko
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Avinash Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amanda A G Nijhuis
- Department of Surgery, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lisa Kottschade
- Department of Surgery, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jennifer Downs
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David E Gyorki
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Stahlie
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David W Ollila
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jill Frank
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yun Song
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Giorgos Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marc Moncrieff
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Nobes
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - John Vetto
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Dale Han
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jeffrey M Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Martin D Fleming
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Michael C Lowe
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Mattsson
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ann Y Lee
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Harvey Chai
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Juri Teras
- Surgery Clinic, North Estonia Medical Center Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Roland M Teras
- Surgery Clinic, North Estonia Medical Center Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Norma E Farrow
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Georgia Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Lukas Been
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Amod A Sarnaik
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Turner RM, Dieng M, Khanna N, Nguyen M, Zeng J, Nijhuis AAG, Nieweg OE, Einstein AJ, Emmett L, Lord SJ, Menzies AM, Thompson JF, Saw RPM, Morton RL. Performance of Long-Term CT and PET/CT Surveillance for Detection of Distant Recurrence in Patients with Resected Stage IIIA-D Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4561-4569. [PMID: 33393039 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09270-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up for patients with resected stage IIIA-D melanoma may include computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging to identify distant metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the test performance over follow-up time, of structured 6- and 12-monthly follow-up imaging schedules in these patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive resected stage IIIA-D melanoma patients from Melanoma Institute Australia (2000-2017). Patients were followed until a confirmed diagnosis of distant metastasis, end of follow-up schedule, or death. Test accuracy was evaluated by cross-classifying the results of the test against a composite reference standard of histopathology, cytology, radiologic imaging, and/or clinical follow-up, and then quantified longitudinally using logistic regression models with random effects. RESULTS In total, 1373 imaging tests were performed among 332 patients. Distant metastases were detected in 110 (33%) patients during a median follow-up of 61 months (interquartile range 38-86), and first detected by imaging in 86 (78%) patients. 152 (68%) patients had at least one false-positive result. Sensitivity of the schedule over 5 years was 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70-86%] and specificity was 88% (95% CI 86-90%). There was no evidence of a significant difference in test performance over follow-up time or by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) substage. The positive predictive value ranged between 33 and 48% over follow-up time, reflecting a ratio of 1:2 false-positives per true-positive finding. CONCLUSIONS Regular 6- or 12-monthly surveillance imaging using CT or PET/CT has reasonable and consistent sensitivity and specificity over 5-year follow-up for resected stage IIIA-D melanoma patients. These data are useful when discussing the risks and benefits of long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin M Turner
- Centre for Biostatistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Mbathio Dieng
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nikita Khanna
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Mai Nguyen
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jiaxu Zeng
- Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Amanda A G Nijhuis
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Einstein
- Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah J Lord
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ravichandran S, Nath N, Jones DC, Li G, Suresh V, Brys AK, Hanks BA, Beasley GM, Salama AKS, Howard BA, Mosca PJ. The utility of initial staging PET-CT as a baseline scan for surveillance imaging in stage II and III melanoma. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:533-539. [PMID: 33161362 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the utility of whole-body PET-CT for the initial staging and subsequent surveillance imaging of patients with completely resected stage II and stage III melanoma. METHODS A single-center, retrospective review of patients who received perioperative whole-body PET-CT from January 1, 2005 to December 1, 2019 within three months of initial melanoma diagnosis was performed. RESULTS Of 258 total patients with completely resected melanoma who had a PET-CT within 3 months after their melanoma diagnosis, 113 had stage II and 145 had stage III melanoma. PET-CT detected distant metastasis in 3 (2.7%) of 113 stage II patients and 7 (4.8%) of 145 stage III patients. 179 of 258 patients had adequate follow-up time to determine whether they received surveillance cross-sectional imaging and whether they had a melanoma recurrence. 143 (79.9%) received subsequent surveillance imaging, 74 of whom developed a recurrence. In 64 (86.5%) of 74 cases, recurrence was detected by routine surveillance. 26 (34.2%) of 76 stage II and 65 (63.1%) of 103 stage III patients developed a recurrence. The median time to recurrence among the 179 patients for stage II and III was 16.3 and 13.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that baseline staging with whole-body PET-CT rarely provides information that changes initial management. Rather, the value of the initial PET-CT is as a baseline for subsequent surveillance scans. Therefore, it may be premature to discourage cross-sectional imaging for patients with stage II and III melanoma without supportive evidence or a reliable biomarker of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surya Ravichandran
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Neel Nath
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David C Jones
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gabriel Li
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Visakha Suresh
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Adam K Brys
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brent A Hanks
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Georgia M Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - April K S Salama
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brandon A Howard
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul J Mosca
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dieng M, Khanna N, Nguyen MTH, Turner R, Lord SJ, Menzies AM, Allen J, Saw R, Nieweg OE, Thompson J, Morton RL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of PET/CT surveillance imaging to detect systemic recurrence in resected stage III melanoma: study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037857. [PMID: 33154047 PMCID: PMC7646332 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the new era of effective systemic therapies for advanced melanoma, early detection of lower volume recurrent disease using surveillance imaging can improve survival. However, intensive imaging follow-up strategies are likely to increase costs to health systems and may pose risks to patients. The objective of this study is to estimate from the Australian health system perspective the cost-effectiveness of four follow-up strategies in resected stage III melanoma over a 5-year period following surgical treatment with curative intent. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A decision-analytic model will be built to estimate the costs and benefits of (1) 12 monthly, (2) 6 monthly, (3) 3-4 monthly positron emission tomography/CT imaging for 5 years, compared with (4) no imaging follow-up. The model will be populated with probabilities of disease recurrence, test performance measures using data from >1000 consecutive resected stage III melanoma patients from Melanoma Institute Australia diagnosed between 2000 and 2017. Healthcare resource use, including surveillance imaging, doctor's visits, subsequent tests and procedures to investigate suspicious findings, will be quantified from detailed patient records and valued using Australian reference pricing. Economic outcomes include cost per new distant melanoma recurrence detected and cost per diagnostic error avoided, for no imaging compared with the other strategies.Deterministic sensitivity analyses will examine the robustness of model results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone), AU/1/830638 and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (EO2019-1-454). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed medical and health economics journals and will inform melanoma management guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mbathio Dieng
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nikita Khanna
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mai Thi Hoang Nguyen
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robin Turner
- Biostatistics, University of Otago Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Sarah J Lord
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jay Allen
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Thompson
- Surgical Oncology, Melanoma Institute of Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bisschop C, de Heer E, Brouwers A, Hospers G, Jalving M. Rational use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 153:103044. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
14
|
Stahlie EHA, van der Hiel B, Stokkel MPM, Schrage YM, van Houdt WJ, Wouters MW, van Akkooi ACJ. The use of FDG-PET/CT to detect early recurrence after resection of high-risk stage III melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1328-1336. [PMID: 32783266 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of surveillance imaging in high-risk stage III melanoma patients after complete surgical resection remains controversial, and with the advent of adjuvant therapy, it may also be expanded. Therefore, we evaluated two fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) protocols in two cohorts. METHODS Cohort 1 (n = 35) focused on surveillance in asymptomatic patients (before approval and reimbursement of adjuvant therapy) and was assigned to 5x FDG-PET/CT's after surgery: one every 6 months for 2 years, with one final scan after 3 years. Cohort 2 (n = 42) was assigned to one screening FDG-PET/CT, which took place in between surgery and the start of adjuvant treatment. RESULTS In cohort 1 (median follow-up: 33 months), 12 patients (34.3%) developed recurrence detected by FDG-PET/CT, of which 7 (20.0%) were detected with the first scan. Sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% and 100%, respectively. In cohort 2, recurrence was suspected on nine scans (21.4%) and four (9.5%) were true positive. The number of scans needed to find one asymptomatic recurrence were 8.8 and 10.5 in cohort 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS FDG-PET/CT is a valuable imaging tool to detect recurrence in stage III melanoma, even shortly after surgery. A surveillance FDG-PET/CT protocol after surgery or a screening PET/CT before adjuvant therapy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma H A Stahlie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernies van der Hiel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne M Schrage
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lewin J, Sayers L, Kee D, Walpole I, Sanelli A, Te Marvelde L, Herschtal A, Spillane J, Gyorki D, Speakman D, Estall V, Donahoe S, Pohl M, Pope K, Chua M, Sandhu S, McArthur GA, McCormack CJ, Henderson M, Hicks RJ, Shackleton M. Surveillance imaging with FDG-PET/CT in the post-operative follow-up of stage 3 melanoma. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1569-1574. [PMID: 29659679 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As early detection of recurrent melanoma maximizes treatment options, patients usually undergo post-operative imaging surveillance, increasingly with FDG-PET/CT (PET). To assess this, we evaluated stage 3 melanoma patients who underwent prospectively applied and sub-stage-specific schedules of PET surveillance. Patients and methods From 2009, patients with stage 3 melanoma routinely underwent PET +/- MRI brain scans via defined schedules based on sub-stage-specific relapse probabilities. Data were collected regarding patient characteristics and outcomes. Contingency analyses were carried out of imaging outcomes. Results One hundred and seventy patients (stage 3A: 34; 3B: 93; 3C: 43) underwent radiological surveillance. Relapses were identified in 65 (38%) patients, of which 45 (69%) were asymptomatic. False-positive imaging findings occurred in 7%, and 6% had treatable second (non-melanoma) malignancies. Positive predictive values (PPV) of individual scans were 56%-83%. Negative scans had predictive values of 89%-96% for true non-recurrence [negative predictive values (NPV)] until the next scan. A negative PET at 18 months had NPVs of 80%-84% for true non-recurrence at any time in the 47-month (median) follow-up period. Sensitivity and specificity of the overall approach of sub-stage-specific PET surveillance were 70% and 87%, respectively. Of relapsed patients, 33 (52%) underwent potentially curative resection and 10 (16%) remained disease-free after 24 months (median). Conclusions Application of sub-stage-specific PET in stage 3 melanoma enables asymptomatic detection of most recurrences, has high NPVs that may provide patient reassurance, and is associated with a high rate of detection of resectable and potentially curable disease at relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lewin
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Sayers
- Cancer Treatment and Development Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Kee
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - I Walpole
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Sanelli
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Te Marvelde
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Herschtal
- Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Spillane
- Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Gyorki
- Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Speakman
- Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - V Estall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Donahoe
- Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Pohl
- Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - K Pope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Sandhu
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - G A McArthur
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - C J McCormack
- Department of Dermatology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - R J Hicks
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Shackleton
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Treatment and Development Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Oncology, Alfred Health, Victoria, Australia; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Allied Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee J, Nam S, Kim SJ. Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Detection of Recurrent Disease after Treatment of Malignant Melanoma. Oncology 2019; 97:286-293. [DOI: 10.1159/000501398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
17
|
Freeman M, Laks S. Surveillance imaging for metastasis in high-risk melanoma: importance in individualized patient care and survivorship. Melanoma Manag 2019; 6:MMT12. [PMID: 31236204 PMCID: PMC6582455 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2019-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Most patients newly diagnosed with melanoma have early-stage disease considered of good prognosis. However, with a risk of recurrence, appropriate follow-up may include surveillance imaging for early relapse detection. Previously, surveillance imaging to detect recurrences was considered unjustified, given the lack of effective treatments. Now, systemic therapies have improved, and patients with low tumor burden may derive benefit from surveillance imaging. Despite this, controversy exists regarding the role of surveillance imaging in early-stage melanoma survivorship, in part reflected by the lack of consensus on specific imaging protocols and broad guidelines. This review discusses published evidence on surveillance imaging to detect metastasis in high-risk melanoma, the need for early recurrence detection and implications for value-based clinical decision-making, survivorship care and multidisciplinary patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morganna Freeman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Shachar Laks
- Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gastman BR, Zager JS, Messina JL, Cook RW, Covington KR, Middlebrook B, Gerami P, Wayne JD, Leachman S, Vetto JT. Performance of a 31-gene expression profile test in cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck. Head Neck 2019; 41:871-879. [PMID: 30694001 PMCID: PMC6667900 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We report the performance of a gene expression profile test to classify the recurrence risk of cutaneous melanoma tumors of the head and neck as low‐risk Class 1 or high‐risk Class 2. Methods Of note, 157 primary head and neck cutaneous melanoma tumors were identified. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan‐Meier and Cox methods. Results Gene expression profile class and node status stratified tumors into significantly different 5‐year survival groups by Kaplan‐Meier method (P < .0001 for all end points), and both were independent predictors of recurrence in multivariate analysis. Overall, 74% of distant metastases and 88% of melanoma‐specific deaths had Class 2 risk. Conclusion The gene expression profile test identifies cases at increased risk for metastasis and death independent of a clinically or pathologically negative nodal status, suggesting that incorporation of this molecular tool could improve clinical management of patients with head and neck cutaneous melanoma, especially in those with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Gastman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jane L Messina
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Robert W Cook
- Research & Development, Castle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, Texas
| | - Kyle R Covington
- Research & Development, Castle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, Texas
| | | | - Pedram Gerami
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.,Skin Cancer Institute, Northwestern University, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeffrey D Wayne
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sancy Leachman
- Department of Dermatology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - John T Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gastman BR, Gerami P, Kurley SJ, Cook RW, Leachman S, Vetto JT. Identification of patients at risk of metastasis using a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in subpopulations of melanoma patients with favorable outcomes by standard criteria. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:149-157.e4. [PMID: 30081113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial number of patients who relapse and die from cutaneous melanoma (CM) are categorized as being at low risk by traditional staging factors. The 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test independently stratifies metastatic risk of patients with CM as low (Class 1, with 1A indicating lowest risk) or high (Class 2,with 2B indicating highest risk). OBJECTIVE To assess risk prediction by the 31-GEP test within 3 low-risk (according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer) populations of patients with CM: those who are sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative, those with stage I to IIA tumors, and those with thin (≤1 mm [T1]) tumors. METHODS A total of 3 previous validation studies provided a nonoverlapping cohort of 690 patients with 31-GEP results, staging information, and survival outcomes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS The results included the identification of 70% of SLN-negative patients who experienced metastasis as Class 2, the discovery of reduced recurrence-free survival for patients with thin tumors and Class 2B biology compared with that of those with Class 1A biology (P < .0001); and determination of the 31-GEP test as an independent predictor of risk compared with traditional staging factors in patients with stage I to IIA tumors. LIMITATIONS Diagnoses spanned multiple versions of pathologic staging criteria. CONCLUSIONS The 31-GEP test identifies high-risk patients who are likely to experience recurrence or die of melanoma within low-risk groups of subpopulations of patients with CM who have SLN-negative disease, stage I to IIA tumors, and thin tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Gastman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Pedram Gerami
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Skin Cancer Institute, Northwestern University Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Sancy Leachman
- Department of Dermatology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - John T Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Friedman EB, Thompson JF. Continuing and new roles for surgery in the management of patients with stage IV melanoma. Melanoma Manag 2018; 5:MMT03. [PMID: 30190929 PMCID: PMC6122527 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2017-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Erica B Friedman
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hsueh EC, DeBloom JR, Lee J, Sussman JJ, Covington KR, Middlebrook B, Johnson C, Cook RW, Slingluff CL, McMasters KM. Interim analysis of survival in a prospective, multi-center registry cohort of cutaneous melanoma tested with a prognostic 31-gene expression profile test. J Hematol Oncol 2017; 10:152. [PMID: 28851416 PMCID: PMC5576286 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-017-0520-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A 31-gene expression profile (GEP) test that provides risk classification of cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients has been validated in several retrospective studies. The objective of the reported study was a prospective evaluation of the GEP performance in patients enrolled in two clinical registries. METHODS Three-hundred twenty two CM patients enrolled in the EXPAND (NCT02355587) and INTEGRATE (NCT02355574) registries met the criteria of age ≥ 16 years, successful GEP result and ≥1 follow-up visit for inclusion in this interim analysis. Primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS), distant metastasis-free (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Median follow-up was 1.5 years for event-free patients. Median age for subjects was 58 years (range 18-87) and median Breslow thickness was 1.2 mm (range 0.2-12.0). Eighty-eight percent (282/322) of cases had stage I/II disease and 74% (237/322) had a SLN biopsy. Seventy-seven percent (248/322) had class 1 molecular profiles. 1.5-year RFS, DMFS, and OS rates were 97 vs. 77%, 99 vs. 89%, and 99 vs. 92% for class 1 vs. class 2, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each). Multivariate Cox regression showed Breslow thickness, mitotic rate, and GEP class to significantly predict recurrence (p < 0.01), while tumor thickness was the only significant predictor of distant metastasis and overall survival in this interim analysis. CONCLUSIONS Interim analysis of patient outcomes from a combined prospective cohort supports the 31-gene GEP's ability to stratify early-stage CM patients into two groups with significantly different metastatic risk. RFS outcomes in this real-world cohort are consistent with previously published analyses with retrospective specimens. GEP testing complements current clinicopathologic features and increases identification of high-risk patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02355574 and NCT02355587.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eddy C. Hsueh
- Dept. of Surgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO USA
| | | | - Jonathan Lee
- Northside Melanoma and Sarcoma Specialists of Georgia, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Jeffrey J. Sussman
- Dept. of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, OH USA
| | - Kyle R. Covington
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive Suite 201, Friendswood, TX USA
| | - Brooke Middlebrook
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive Suite 201, Friendswood, TX USA
| | - Clare Johnson
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive Suite 201, Friendswood, TX USA
| | - Robert W. Cook
- Castle Biosciences, Inc., 820 S. Friendswood Drive Suite 201, Friendswood, TX USA
| | - Craig L. Slingluff
- Dept. of Surgery and Cancer Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Kelly M. McMasters
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY USA
| |
Collapse
|