A phase II trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine combined with hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Randomized clinical trial on accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus preoperative hyperfractionated radio-chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare pathological response rates after preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy with co-administration of chemotherapy based on 5FU (HART-CT) versus preoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) in patients with resectable rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with T2/N+ or T3/any N rectal cancer were randomized either to HART twice a day (28 fractions of 1.5 Gy) to total dose 42 Gy or to HART-CT. Tumour regression grade was postoperatively assessed according to the 4-point scale as recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity of preoperative treatment, locoregional, and distant failure rates. There were 187 patients eligible for analysis: 95 in HART and 92 in the HART-CT. Median follow-up was 5.6 years.

RESULTS

The analysis demonstrated a significantly higher chance of achieving pathologic complete response in HART-CT arm: complete response was achieved in 4/95, 4% (HART) and 11/92, 12% (HART-CT) (P = .045). The differences in OS and DFS, while tending to favour HART-CT, were not significant: OS (P = .13, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.63-1.06) and DFS (P = .32; HR = 0.88, 95% CI, 0.69-1.13). The locoregional failure and distant metastases rates did not statistically differ between the trial arms. The rate of late complications was similar (P = .51), grade 3+ being 8% versus 11% in the HART/HART-CT group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The hyperfractionated preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent 5-Fu-based chemotherapy (HART-CT) improved pathological response rate compared to HART. This translated into favourable OS and DFS in HART-CT, but the differences did not reach the threshold for significance.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

A new hyperfractionated chemo-RT scheme is proposed. Histopathological major response (TRG 0-1) is associated with better clinical outcome.

Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment and Reporting in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Demographic Comparison to the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Cancer care guidelines based on clinical trial data in homogenous populations may not be applicable to all rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients enrolled in rectal cancer clinical trials (CTs) are representative of United States (U.S.) rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Prospective rectal cancer CTs from 2010 to 2019 in the United States were systematically reviewed. In trials with multiple arms reporting separate demographic variables, each arm was considered a separate CT group in the analysis. Demographic variables considered in the analysis were age, sex, race/ethnicity, facility location throughout the United States, rural vs urban geography, and facility type. Participant demographics from trial and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) participants were compared using chi-squared goodness of fit and one-sample t-test where applicable.

RESULTS

Of 50 CT groups identified, 42 (82%) studies reported mean or median age. Trial participants were younger compared to NCDB patients (P < .001 all studies). All but three trials had fewer female patients than NCDB (48.2% female, P < .001). Less than half the CT groups reported on race or ethnicity. Eighteen out of 22 trials (82%) had a smaller percentage of Black patients and 4 out of 8 (50%) trials had fewer Hispanic or Spanish origin patients than the NCDB. No CTs reported comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, or education. CT primary sites were largely at academic centers and in urban areas.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports the need for improved demographic representation and transparency in rectal cancer clinical trials.

Radiation hematologic toxicity prediction for locally advanced rectal cancer using dosimetric and radiomics features

BACKGROUND

Hematologic toxicity (HT) is a common adverse tissue reaction during radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients, which may lead to various negative effects such as reduced therapeutic effect, prolonged treatment period and increased treatment cost. Therefore, predicting the occurrence of HT before radiotherapy is necessary but still challenging.

PURPOSE

This study proposes a hybrid machine learning model to predict the symptomatic radiation HT in rectal cancer patients using the combined demographic, clinical, dosimetric, and Radiomics features, and ascertains the most effective regions of interest (ROI) in CT images and predictive feature sets.

METHODS

A discovery dataset of 240 rectal cancer patients, including 145 patients with HT symptoms and a validation dataset of 96 patients (63 patients with HT) with different dose prescription were retrospectively enrolled. Eight ROIs were contoured on patient CT images to derive Radiomics features, which were then, respectively, combined with the demographic, clinical, and dosimetric features to classify patients with HT symptoms. Moreover, the survival analysis was performed on risky patients with HT in order to understand the HT progression.

RESULTS

The classification models in ROIs of bone marrow and femoral head exhibited relatively high accuracies (accuracy = 0.765 and 0.725) in the discovery dataset as well as comparable performances in the validation dataset (accuracy = 0.758 and 0.714). When combining the two ROIs together, the model performance was the best in both discovery and validation datasets (accuracy = 0.843 and 0.802). In the survival analysis test, only the bone marrow ROI achieved statistically significant performance in accessing risky HT (C-index = 0.658, P = 0.03). Most of the discriminative features were Radiomics features, and only gender and the mean dose in Irradvolume was involved in HT.

CONCLUSION

The results reflect that the Radiomics features of bone marrow are significantly correlated with HT occurrence and progression in rectal cancer. The proposed Radiomics-based model may help the early detection of radiotherapy induced HT in rectal cancer patients and thus improve the clinical outcome in future.

Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Purpose

In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

We retrospectively screened patients with LARC from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients that received hyperfractionated IMRT or conventional fractionated IMRT were eligible in the hyperfractionation (HF) group or conventional fractionation (CF) group, respectively. The primary outcome was the complete response rate. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, postoperative complications, anus-reservation operation rate, local recurrence and distant metastases rate, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

335 patients were included in the analysis. The complete response rate for the hyperfractionated and conventional fractionated IMRT was 20.41% vs. 23.47% (P = 0.583). The anus-reservation operation rate was 68.37% vs. 65.31% (P = 0.649). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity during radiotherapy; the rate of grade 3 toxicity and postoperative complications was both comparable between groups. However, in the CF group, more patients had a second operation due to complications (0.0% vs. 5.68%, P = 0.011). The cumulative local regional recurrence and distant metastases rates of the HF group and CF group were 5.10% vs. 9.18% (P = 0.267) and 22.45% vs. 24.49% (P = 0.736), respectively. The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS in the HF group and CF group were 86.45% vs. 73.30% (P = 0.503), 87.34% vs. 75.23% (P = 0.634), and 70.80% vs. 68.11% (P = 0.891), respectively.

Conclusions

The preoperative hyperfractionated IMRT with oral capecitabine, with an acceptable toxicity and favorable response and survival, could reduce the rate of secondary surgery.

Recent advances in (chemo-)radiation therapy for rectal cancer: a comprehensive review

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of (colo)-rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the past decades. Introduced with the aim of reducing the high rates of local recurrences after conventional surgery, major developments in imaging, surgical technique, systemic therapy and radiation delivery have now created a much more complex environment leading to a more personalized approach. Functional aspects including reduction of acute or late treatment-related side effects, sphincter or even organ-preservation and the unsolved problem of still high distant failure rates have become more important while local recurrence rates can be kept low in the vast majority of patients. This review summarizes the actual role of radiation therapy in different subgroups of patients with rectal cancer, including the current standard approach in different subgroups as well as recent developments focusing on neoadjuvant treatment intensification and/or non-operative treatment approaches aiming at organ-preservation.

Phase 2 Neoadjuvant Treatment Intensification Trials in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Multiple phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant treatment intensification in locally advanced rectal cancer have reported promising efficacy signals, but these have not translated into improved cancer outcomes in phase 3 trials. Improvements in phase 2 trial design are needed to reduce these false-positive signals. This systematic review evaluated the design of phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant long-course radiation or chemoradiation therapy treatment intensification in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant treatment intensification from 2004 to 2016. Trial clinical design and outcomes were assessed, with statistical design and compliance rated using a previously published system. Multivariable meta-regression analysis of pathologic complete response (pCR) was conducted.

RESULTS

We identified 92 eligible trials. Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II and III equivalent disease were eligible in 87 trials (94.6%). In 43 trials (46.7%), local staging on magnetic resonance imaging was mandated. Only 12 trials (13.0%) were randomized, with 8 having a standard-treatment control arm. Just 51 trials (55.4%) described their statistical design, with 21 trials (22.8%) failing to report their sample size derivation. Most trials (n=84, 91.3%) defined a primary endpoint, but 15 different primary endpoints were used. All trials reported pCR rates. Only 38 trials (41.3%) adequately reported trial statistical design and compliance. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled pCR rate of 17.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.7%-19.4%) across treatment arms of neoadjuvant long-course radiation or chemoradiation therapy treatment intensification and substantial heterogeneity among the reported effect sizes (I² = 55.3%, P<.001). Multivariable meta-regression analysis suggested increased pCR rates with higher radiation therapy doses (adjusted P=.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in the design of future phase 2 rectal cancer trials is urgently required. A significant increase in randomized trials is essential to overcome selection bias and determine novel schedules suitable for phase 3 testing. This systematic review provides key recommendations to guide future treatment intensification trial design in rectal cancer.

Pre-operative hyperfractionated concurrent radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers: a phase II clinical study

OBJECTIVE

The study was prospectively designed as a single-arm, single-institution prospective trial of pre-operative concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) with co-administration of chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with T2/N+ or T3/any N resectable mid-low primary rectal cancer. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of accelerated HART with concurrent 5FU-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with resectable locally advanced (≥T3 or N+) rectal cancer were eligible. The patients received total dose 42 Gy in 28 fractions of 1.5 Gy, two times daily, with at least 8 h of interval, with concurrent chemotherapy: 325 mg m^-2 of 5FU (bolus) on Days 1-3 and Days 16-18 (except for cN0 patients for whom only one cycle on Days 1-3 was prescribed). The primary end point included tolerance, post-operative complication rate and pathological response rate. The secondary end points included locoregional relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Out of 53 enrolled patients; 2 did not undergo surgery. Of the 51 patients evaluable for pathological response, there were 8 (15.6%), 20 (39.3%), 18 (35.3%) and 5 (9.8%) patients with tumour regression grade 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Downstaging of the primary tumour and lymph nodes was observed in 22 (43%) and 25 (49%) patients, respectively. The primary tumour ypCR (ypT0) rate was 15% (8/51). The nodal ypCR rate for cN+ patients was 60% (21/35). The total ypCR (ypT0N0M0) rate was 11% (6/51). Toxicity included: Grade 3 diarrhoea (4/51, 7.8%), Grade 2 diarrhoea (22/51, 43.1%), Grade 2 leukopenia (7/51, 13.7%), Grade 2 neutropenia (6/51, 11.7%) and Grade 1 thrombocytopenia (3/51, 5.9%). No Grade 4 toxicity was reported. Nine patients (18%) presented with post-operative complications (during the 3 months after surgery). There were 6 locoregional relapses (11.8%) and distant metastasis occurred in 11 patients (21.6%). The 2-year cumulative locoregional relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival was 87%, 79% and 89%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The proposed pre-operative HART with co-administration of 5FU had acceptable toxicity profile and provided satisfactory rate of ypCR. This created rationale to initiate a Phase III randomized study that was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01814969. Advances in knowledge: The results of this research show that responders to pre-operative radiochemotherapy have favourable outcome. Tumour regression grade as prognostic clinical feature holds the promise of better classifying patients at high risk of local and systemic recurrence and this issue may be an interesting objective for future research.

Lapatinib-capecitabine versus capecitabine alone as radiosensitizers in RAS wild-type resectable rectal cancer, an adaptive randomized phase II trial (LaRRC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiochemotherapy followed by surgical removal of the rectum with total mesorectum excision is the preferred treatment option for stages II and III rectal cancer. However, development of metastatic disease is the main cause of death for these patients with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 56 %. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy is effective in metastatic rectal cancer, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) signaling may mediate resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Moreover, preclinical data support a synergistic effect of EGFR inhibition with radiation therapy.

METHODS/DESIGN

This Bayesian phase II trial with adaptive randomization was designed to assess the efficacy of adding lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR and HER-2, to standard radiochemotherapy with capecitabine in stages II and III rectal cancer.

DISCUSSION

The results of this trial will provide evidence of the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of lapatinib-capecitabine as radiosensitizers and explore potential predictive biomarkers for response to this novel neoadjuvant approach to resectable rectal cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT 2013-001203-36 . Registered on 13 December 2013.

A randomized phase II study of capecitabine-based chemoradiation with or without bevacizumab in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer: clinical and biological features

BACKGROUND

Perioperatory chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves local control and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab (BEV) to preoperative capecitabine (CAP)-based CRT in LARC, and to explore biomarkers for downstaging.

METHODS

Patients (pts) were randomized to receive 5 weeks of radiotherapy 45 Gy/25 fractions with concurrent CAP 825 mg/m(2) twice daily 5 days per week and BEV 5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (3 doses) (arm A), or the same schedule without BEV (arm B). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (ypCR: ypT0N0).

RESULTS

Ninety pts were included in arm A (44) or arm B (46). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicity rates were 16% and 13%, respectively. All patients but one (arm A) proceeded to surgery. The ypCR rate was 16% in arm A and 11% in arm B (p =0.54). Fifty-nine percent vs 39% of pts achieved T-downstaging (arm A vs arm B; p =0.04). Serial samples for biomarker analyses were obtained for 50 out of 90 randomized pts (arm A/B: 22/28). Plasma angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) levels decreased in arm A and increased in arm B (p <0.05 at all time points). Decrease in Ang-2 levels from baseline to day 57 was significantly associated with tumor downstaging (p =0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of BEV to CAP-based preoperative CRT has shown to be feasible in LARC. The association between decreasing Ang-2 levels and tumor downstaging should be further validated in customized studies.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01043484. Trial registration date: 12/30/2009.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

The timing of surgery after preoperative short-course S-1 chemoradiotherapy with delayed surgery for T3 lower rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of variations in clinical practice regarding the timing of surgery with short-course chemoradiotherapy with delayed surgery (SCRT-delay) for lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 171 patients with T3 N0-2 lower rectal cancer treated with SCRT-delay (25 Gy/10 fractions/5 days (S-1); days 1-10) were retrospectively evaluated. The median waiting period of 30 days was used as a discriminator (group A: waiting period, ≤30 days; group B: waiting period, ≥31 days). Preoperative treatment responses and oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean waiting periods for groups A and B were 24.4 ± 5.3 and 41.4 ± 12.3 days, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the clinical variables. The clinicopathological outcomes were as follows: T downstaging (43.5 vs 37.2 %; p = 0.400), negative yp N (67.1 vs 75.6 %; p = 0.218), pCR (7.1 vs 1.2 %; p = 0.119). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (89.3 vs 87.6 %; p = 0.956), the recurrence-free survival (82.2 vs 78.8 %; p = 0.662), and the overall survival (88.5 vs 84.4 %; p = 0.741), all of which were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The longer waiting period did not increase the tumor downstaging and not improve the oncological outcomes for T3 lower rectal cancer treated with SCRT-delay. In addition, considering that the impaired leukocyte response occurred during the sub-acute period, any time after the sub-acute period (day 12) up to 30 days after radiotherapy would be a suitable waiting period.

Neoadjuvant short-course hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (SC-HART) combined with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of a novel protocol of neoadjuvant short-course hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (SC-HART) combined with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer. A total of 56 patients with lower rectal cancer of cT3N1M0 (Stage III b) was treated with SC-HART followed by radical surgery, and were analyzed in the present study. SC-HART was performed with a dose of 2.5 Gy twice daily, with an interval of at least 6 hours between fractions, up to a total dose of 25 Gy (25 Gy in 10 fractions for 5 days) combined with S-1 for 10 days. Radical surgery was performed within three weeks following the end of the SC-HART. The median age was 64.6 (range, 39-85) years. The median follow-up term was 16.3 (range, 2-53) months. Of the 56 patients, 53 (94.4%) had no apparent adverse events before surgery; 55 (98.2%) completed the full course of neoadjuvant therapy, while one patient stopped chemotherapy because of Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (CTCAE v.3). The sphincter preservation rate was 94.6%. Downstaging was observed in 45 patients (80.4%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 43 patients (76.8%). The local control rate, disease-free survival rate and disease-specific survival rate were 100%, 91.1% and 100%, respectively. To conclude, SC-HART combined with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer was well tolerated and produced good short-term outcomes. SC-HART therefore appeared to have a good feasibility for use in further clinical trials.

A observational study of the efficacy and safety of capecitabine versus bolus infusional 5-fluorouracil in pre-operative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with bolus infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four patients were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-seven patients were treated with 5-FU (350 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus) for 5 days/week during week 1 and 5 of RT. Forty-seven patients were treated with capecitabine (850 mg/m(2), twice daily for 5 days/week). Both groups received the same RT course (45-50.4 Gy/25 fractions, 5 days/week, for 5 weeks). Patients underwent surgery in 6 weeks after completion of the chemoradiotherapy. Data of the observational study were collected.

RESULTS

Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in 40.7% (5-FU) and 19.1% (capecitabine) of the patients (P = 0.044). Six patients in the 5-FU group (22.2%) and six patients in the capecitabine group (14%) achieved complete response. Primary tumor (T) downstaging were achieved in 51.9% (5-FU) and 69.8% (capecitabine) of the patients. The pathological ypT0-2 stage was 40.7% (5-FU) and 67.4% (capecitabine) (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

In consideration of the better ypT0-2 downstaging rate, less severe toxicities, and no need for indwelling intravenous device on oral capecitabine regimen, the administration of oral capecitabine with RT may be a more favorable option in the neoadjuvant treatment for LARC.

Long-term follow-up of preoperative pelvic radiation therapy and concomitant boost irradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a multi-institutional phase II study (KROG 04-01)

PURPOSE

To perform a prospective phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative pelvic radiation therapy and concomitant small-field boost irradiation with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for 5 weeks in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-nine patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic, mid-to-lower rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled. They had received preoperative chemoradiation therapy and total mesorectal excision. Pelvic radiation therapy of 43.2 Gy in 24 fractions plus concomitant boost radiation therapy of 7.2 Gy in 12 fractions was delivered to the pelvis and tumor bed for 5 weeks. Two cycles of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin were administered for 3 days in the first and fifth week of radiation therapy. The pathologic response, survival outcome, and treatment toxicity were evaluated for the study endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 69 patients, 8 (11.6%) had a pathologically complete response. Downstaging rates were 40.5% for T classification and 68.1% for N classification. At the median follow-up of 69 months, 36 patients have been followed up for more than 5 years. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival rates were 66.0% and 75.3%, respectively. Higher pathologic T (P=.045) and N (P=.032) classification were significant adverse prognostic factors for DFS, and high-grade histology was an adverse prognostic factor for both DFS (P=.025) and overall survival (P=.031) on the multivariate analysis. Fifteen patients (21.7%) experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity, and 7 patients (10.1%) had long-term toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative pelvic radiation therapy with concomitant boost irradiation with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for 5 weeks showed acceptable acute and long-term toxicities. However, the benefit of concomitant small-field boost irradiation for 5 weeks in rectal cancer patients was not demonstrated beyond conventional irradiation for 6 weeks in terms of tumor response and survival.

Recommendations and expert opinion on the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain

In Spain 22,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year, with 13,075 deaths resulting from this disease. Around 70% of colorectal cancers are localised in the colon and 30% in the rectum. A group of Spanish experts established recommendations on what would be the best strategy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Adequate assessment of local tumour extension, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound, is essential for successful treatment. The three cornerstones in the treatment of LARC are surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Most patients will need a total mesorectal excision (TME). Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is preferred for the majority of patients with T3/T4 disease and/or regional node involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after a patient-sharing decision. Capecitabine, after showing a trend in improved downstaging in neoadjuvant stratum and the convenience of its oral administration, represents an alternative to 5-FU as perioperative treatment of LARC.