Squamous cell cancer of the anal canal in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy: a single institution experience

Difference in toxicity between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients with squamous-cell cancer of the anal canal treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy

Background

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal has been increasing over the last 30 years. HIV has been found to be a risk factor for the development of this disease; radio-chemotherapy (RTCT) may also be more toxic than in HIV-negative patients. The study aims at assessing whether there are any differences in terms of toxicity between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients treated with concomitant RTCT.

Methods

Search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (via Cochrane Library-Wiley), DARE, LILACS bibliographic databases. Experimental and analytical observational studies with at least two comparative arms were included: squamous-cell (SC) anal-canal cancer (ACC) treated with RTCT in HIV-positive vs. HIV-negative patients.

Results

Fifteen publications, 14 retrospective studies and 1 systematic review, were found. All radiotherapy (RT) techniques and all chemotherapeutic agents used to manage this disease were included. No differences were found in terms of duration (P=0.67) and dose (P=0.53) of RT, while CT results were contradictory. Acute and hematological toxicities were significantly higher in HIV-positive patients, while gastrointestinal, dermatological and chronic toxicities did not significantly differ between the two groups. Given the high heterogeneity of the studies, no objective comparison could be made between studies that included antiretrovirals and those that did not.

Conclusions

HIV-positive patients may be at higher risk for acute and hematological toxicity than HIV-negative patients. A precise conclusion cannot be drawn on the use of antiretrovirals, given the high heterogeneity of data.

Prognostic Significance of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Prognostic significance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been evaluated in several studies; however, the results seem to be controversial and no consensus exists about its predictive capability. The current meta-analysis was carried out to comprehensively investigate the prognostic significance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET parameters in patients with anal SCC.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was performed to retrieve pertinent articles published until August 5th 2018, concerning the prognostic significance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET in patients with anal SCC. No language restriction was used. Several prognostic factors were reported for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) including pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), inguinal nodal uptake, and metabolic response to therapy.

Results

Eleven studies (741 patients) were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the probability of PFS was 5.36 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.12–9.21, p < 0.001) for metabolic response to therapy and 1.98 (95% CI: 1.26–3.12, p=0.003) for SUVmax. The pooled HR for the probability of OS was 5.87 (3.02–11.39, p < 0.0001) for metabolic response to therapy. On the other hand, the study revealed that the pooled HRs of MTV and inguinal nodal uptake for PFS were 1.56 (95% CI: 0.96–2.53, p=0.072) and 1.79 (95% CI: 1–3.21, p=0.051), respectively.

Conclusions

Our findings propose that some ¹⁸F-FDG-PET parameters could serve as prognostic indicators in anal SCC, but further larger studies are needed in this setting.

Recent advances in the management of anal cancer

Anal cancer is a rare condition, although its incidence has been increasing over the past several decades, particularly in women. The majority of anal cancers are squamous cell cancers and are linked with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Recent work in HPV basic science has delineated the mechanism by which the virus leads to the development of anal cancer. With widespread availability of an HPV vaccine since 2006, vaccination has become an important strategy for anal cancer prevention. However, in the US, there remain no guidelines for anal cancer screening. Treatment of anal cancer is dictated largely by accurate staging, which is generally accomplished with a combination of physical exam, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography. Chemoradiation remains the mainstay of treatment for most patients, with surgery reserved for salvage therapy. Recent trials have identified the optimal use of available chemotherapeutics. Exciting developments in immune therapies targeting HPV oncoproteins as well as therapeutic vaccines may soon dramatically change the way patients with anal cancer are managed.

Organ-Specific Toxicities Due to Radiation Therapy in Cancer Patients With or Without HIV Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: To synthesize published literature on the association between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and radiation therapy (RT)-related toxicities. Methods: Two electronic databases, MEDLINE and Embase, were searched to identify studies published before November 2016 comparing RT-related toxicities between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients receiving RT or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for cancer. A qualitative synthesis of included articles and organ-specific toxicities was then performed. Results: Of the 21 studies included in this review, 15 reported on anal cancer treatment, three on cervical cancer, two on Kaposi sarcoma, and one on prostate cancer. Reports in the pre-antiretroviral therapy (ART) or early ART era tended to identify increased morbidity and mortality with HIV infection. However, modern series incorporating more concurrent chemotherapy, conformal RT techniques, and ART administration result in fewer studies reporting toxicity differences in patients treated for anal and cervical cancers. When statistically significant, HIV-infected patients had higher rates of gastrointestinal toxicity with anal cancer CRT (up to 50%) and higher rates of hematologic toxicity with cervical cancer CRT (up to 31%). Of the 17 studies reporting treatment outcomes, nine suggest HIV-infected patients may have reduced local control and/or survival rates. Conclusions: Overall, RT is likely similarly tolerated between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients, especially with modern RT techniques. HIV-infected patients should continue to receive established standard of care RT and CRT dosing.

Chemoradiotherapy completion and neutropenia risk in HIV patients with cervical cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining diseases and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is thought to relate with increased acute toxicity of chemoradiotherapy (CRT).We investigated the effect of HIV status in the incidence of neutropenia associated with cisplatin-based CRT for CC and its impact in treatment completion.This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Data collection was performed for all the consecutive stage Ib-IV CC women treated with cisplatin-based CRT from 2012 to 2016, and with known HIV status.Sixty-one patients were included, 6 were HIV+. HIV+ patients had a higher risk of neutropenia at any cycle during cisplatin CRT [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02-52.3; P = .05]. Despite the absolute differences, mean neutrophil count was nonsignificantly lower in HIV+ women, both at baseline [4455/μL (interquartile range, IQR: 1830-6689) vs 6340 (IQR: 1720-18,970) for HIV-, P = .98] and at the end of treatment [1752/μL (IQR: 1100-2930) vs 3147/μL (IQR: 920-18,390) in HIV-; P = .06]. Moreover, when considering the effect of time, CRT seems to induce a consistent drop of neutrophils in both groups (P = .229). No febrile neutropenia events occurred.In HIV+ women, there were more CT cycle delays (P = .013), patients were more prone to use granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; HIV+ 40.0% vs HIV- 4.0%; P = .04) and less likely to complete at least 5 cycles of cisplatin (P = .02). All patients received adequate dose of pelvic RT, regardless of HIV status.HIV+ patients have a significantly increased risk of neutropenia during CRT treatment for CC and are less likely to complete chemotherapy with cisplatin.

Prognostic and Predictive Clinicopathologic Factors of Squamous Anal Canal Cancer in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Patients: Does HAART Influence Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal has been rising over the past decades, especially in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Despite the advent of potent multidrug regimens to treat HIV-termed highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), anal SCC rates have not declined, and the impact of HAART on anal SCC remains controversial.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to define outcomes of anal SCC treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective single-institution analysis was performed on all patients with anal SCC treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1991 and 2010. The primary outcomes measured were 5-year overall survival (5-year OS), median survival, and relapse rates.

RESULTS

Our search identified 93 patients with anal SCC. Patients had a mean age of 54 years; 37.6% were male, and 21.5% were HIV-positive. Median follow-up was 28 months. Relapse occurred in 16.1% of patients. Median time to relapse was 20 months. Relapse rates were slightly higher with HIV-positive versus negative patients (30.0 vs. 12.3%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). Among HIV-positive patients, those who relapsed were more likely to be on HAART than those who did not relapse (83.3 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.007). 5-year OS was 58.9% for the total group of patients with no significant difference between those who relapsed versus those who did not (76.2 vs. 54.5%, p = 0.20). No survival difference was seen between HIV-positive and negative patients. Survival was associated with AJCC stage in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In our small series, HIV infection was not associated with a significantly higher relapse rate or worse 5-year OS among patients with anal SCC. HAART was associated with a higher rate of relapse in HIV-positive patients. AJCC staging predicted survival in both relapsed and non-relapsed patients regardless of HIV status.

HIV Status and Acute Hematologic Toxicity Among Patients With Cervix Cancer Undergoing Radical Chemoradiation

INTRODUCTION

Women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have a higher risk of developing cervix carcinoma than do other women who are thought to be more vulnerable to acute toxicities during chemoradiation. We compared HIV-positive/HIV-negative patients with cervix carcinoma at a single institution with respect to cancer treatment toxicities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Among patients with stage Ib1-IIIb invasive cervical carcinoma who received radiation or chemoradiation with curative intent, we evaluated demographic and clinical characteristics of HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. Treatment regimens were documented and toxicities scored as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines. We developed logistic regression models for the associations of grade 3/4 toxicities with HIV status.

RESULTS

Complete data were available on 213 patients, including 36 (16.8%) who were HIV positive. More than 85% of both HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients received a minimum of 68-Gy equivalent dose in 2-Gy-fraction external beam and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. More HIV-positive than HIV-negative patients were prescribed radiation alone (38.9% vs 24.29%, P = 0.01), experienced at least 1 grade 3/4 toxicity (38.9% vs 26.6%), or developed grade 3/4 leucopenia (30.6% vs 10.2%, P = 0.003).In a multivariable model, patients who developed a grade 3/4 toxicity were 4 times as likely to have received chemotherapy (odds ratio, 4.41 [95% confidence interval, 1.76-11.1]; P = 0.023) and twice as likely to be HIV positive (odds ratio 2.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.98-4.8]; P = 0.05) as women who did not experience such toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-positive patients with cervical carcinoma received adequate radiotherapy but were less likely than HIV-negative patients to complete chemotherapy. Few HIV-positive or HIV-negative patients who received radiotherapy without chemotherapy experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. However, among patients who received chemotherapy, those who were HIV positive were more likely than others to experience hematologic toxicity.

MRI and CT of anal carcinoma: a pictorial review

BACKGROUND

Squamocellular anal carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed in patients with risk factors.

METHODS

State-of-the-art imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using phased-array coils and volumetric multidetector computed tomography (CT) provides detailed visualisation of anal disorders, identification and extent assessment of neoplastic tissue, detection and characterisation of nodal and visceral metastases. MRI has been recommended by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) as the preferred modality of choice to stage anal cancer, taking into account the maximum tumour diameter, invasion of adjacent structures and regional lymph node involvement.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional imaging techniques allow the identification of coexisting complications, and differentiation from other perineal abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Cross-sectional imaging is useful for planning radiotherapy, surgical drainage or salvage abdomino-perineal resection. After chemo-radiotherapy, MRI follow-up provides confident reassessment of therapeutic response, persistent or recurrent disease. TEACHING POINTS : • Anal carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), anoreceptive intercourse, chronic inflammatory bowel disease. • An established association exists with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and premalignant intra-epithelial dysplasia. • Phased-array MRI is recommended as the preferred imaging modality for regional staging. • Imaging allows detection of infectious complications, planning of radiotherapy or salvage surgery. • Follow-up MRI allows reliable assessment of therapeutic response after chemo-radiotherapy.

Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of anal cancer

Rare in the general population, anal cancer has reached epidemic proportions among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). These cancers are human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated, usually HPV type16, and are analogous to cervical cancer. At present, the rates of anal cancer in this group are 10-fold higher than that of cervical cancer occurring in women in the general population. Although there are no national guidelines for screening for anal intraepithelial dysplasia (AIN), many large HIV clinics are now performing anal cytologic screening in their at-risk patients. This paper outlines the current approach to screening for AIN and its management.

Completion of and early response to chemoradiation among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma in South Africa

BACKGROUND

Very few published studies have dealt with the management of locally advanced cervix carcinoma among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics, radiation and chemotherapy treatments, and outcomes in a cohort of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women with cervical cancer.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the charts of 59 HIV-positive patients and 324 HIV-negative patients who had stage IB1 to IIIB cervical carcinoma and who received radiation therapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared at the time of diagnosis; and radiation doses, chemotherapy cycles, and responses were compared at the time of brachytherapy and at 6-week follow-up. Logistic regression models of response to treatment were developed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine HIV-positive patients (88.1%) but only 213 HIV-negative patients (65.7%) presented with stage IIIB disease (P = .009). Forty-seven HIV-positive patients (79.7%) and 291 HIV-negative patients (89.8%) completed the equivalent dose of 68 Grays (Gy) external-beam radiation and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. (P = .03). Of the 333 patients who commenced concurrent chemotherapy, 26 HIV-positive patients (53.1%) and 212 HIV-negative patients (74.6%) completed ≥4 weekly cycles of platinum-based treatment. Follow-up was censured at 6 weeks. In models that included age, disease stage, HIV status, and treatment, a poor response at 6 weeks was associated only with stage IIIB disease (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-3.96) and receiving an equivalent radiation dose in 2-Gy fractions of <68 Gy (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.24-7.94).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-positive patients fared worse than HIV-negative patients because of later presentation and a decreased likelihood of completing treatment. The current findings emphasize the importance of completing irradiation therapy. Further studies will address the association of these variables with survival.