1
|
Brandão M, Martins-Branco D, De Angelis C, Vuylsteke P, Gelber RD, Van Damme N, van Walle L, Ferreira AR, Lambertini M, Poggio F, Verhoeven D, Barbeaux A, Duhoux FP, Wildiers H, Caballero C, Awada A, Piccart-Gebhart M, Punie K, de Azambuja E. Correction: Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Belgium. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07275-0. [PMID: 38592543 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07275-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Brandão
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Diogo Martins-Branco
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claudia De Angelis
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Clinical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter Vuylsteke
- CHU UCL Namur, Site Ste Elisabeth, UC Louvain, Namur, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Richard D Gelber
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, USA
| | - Nancy Van Damme
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, USA
| | | | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Católica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rio de Mouro, Portugal
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Didier Verhoeven
- Medical Oncology, AZ Klina, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Francois P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute and University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | | | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart-Gebhart
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute and University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gómez Tejeda Zañudo J, Barroso-Sousa R, Jain E, Jin Q, Li T, Buendia-Buendia JE, Pereslete A, Abravanel DL, Ferreira AR, Wrabel E, Helvie K, Hughes ME, Partridge AH, Overmoyer B, Lin NU, Tayob N, Tolaney SM, Wagle N. Exemestane plus everolimus and palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer: clinical response and genomic/transcriptomic determinants of resistance in a phase I/II trial. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2446. [PMID: 38503755 PMCID: PMC10951222 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45835-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The landscape of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) resistance is still being elucidated and the optimal subsequent therapy to overcome resistance remains uncertain. Here we present the final results of a phase Ib/IIa, open-label trial (NCT02871791) of exemestane plus everolimus and palbociclib for CDK4/6i-resistant metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective of phase Ib was to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase II dose (100 mg palbociclib, 5 mg everolimus, 25 mg exemestane). The primary objective of phase IIa was to determine the clinical benefit rate (18.8%, n = 6/32), which did not meet the predefined endpoint (65%). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic profiling (phase Ib), objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and progression free survival (phase IIa), and correlative multi-omics analysis to investigate biomarkers of resistance to CDK4/6i. All participants were female. Multi-omics data from the phase IIa patients (n = 24 tumor/17 blood biopsy exomes; n = 27 tumor transcriptomes) showed potential mechanisms of resistance (convergent evolution of HER2 activation, BRAFV600E), identified joint genomic/transcriptomic resistance features (ESR1 mutations, high estrogen receptor pathway activity, and a Luminal A/B subtype; ERBB2/BRAF mutations, high RTK/MAPK pathway activity, and a HER2-E subtype), and provided hypothesis-generating results suggesting that mTOR pathway activation correlates with response to the trial's therapy. Our results illustrate how genome and transcriptome sequencing may help better identify patients likely to respond to CDK4/6i therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Gómez Tejeda Zañudo
- Cancer Program, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Romualdo Barroso-Sousa
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Esha Jain
- Cancer Program, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Repare Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Qingchun Jin
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, USA
| | - Tianyu Li
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, USA
| | - Jorge E Buendia-Buendia
- Cancer Program, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Cellarity, Somerville, MA, USA
| | | | - Daniel L Abravanel
- Cancer Program, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eileen Wrabel
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karla Helvie
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beth Overmoyer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, MA, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Cancer Program, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brandão M, Martins-Branco D, De Angelis C, Vuylsteke P, Gelber RD, Van Damme N, van Walle L, Ferreira AR, Lambertini M, Poggio F, Verhoeven D, Barbeaux A, Duhoux FP, Wildiers H, Caballero C, Awada A, Piccart-Gebhart M, Punie K, de Azambuja E. Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Belgium. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:351-363. [PMID: 37878152 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07116-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the impact of surgery of primary tumor in overall survival (OS) of women with de novo metastatic breast cancer. METHODS Nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with de novo metastatic breast cancer in Belgium, between Jan/2010-Dec/2014. Data was obtained from the Belgian Cancer Registry and administrative databases. "Surgery" group was defined by surgery of primary tumor up to nine months after diagnosis. We excluded women who did not receive systemic treatment or did not complete nine months follow-up after diagnosis. All the subsequent analyses reporting on overall survival and the stratified outcome analyses were performed based on this nine-month landmark cohort. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models controlling for confounders with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed a stratified analysis according to surgery timing and a propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS 1985 patients, 534 (26.9%) in the "Surgery" and 1451 (73.1%) in the "No Surgery" group. Patients undergoing surgery were younger (p < 0.001), had better performance status (PS) (p < 0.001), and higher proportion of HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (p = 0.012). Median follow-up was 86.0 months (82.6-88.5). Median OS was 60.1 months (57.1-68.2) in the "Surgery" vs. 41.9 months (39.8-44.2) in the "No Surgery" group (adjusted HR 0.56; 0.49-0.64). OS was similar when surgery was performed upfront or after systemic treatment. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the same findings. CONCLUSION Among patients receiving systemic treatment for de novo metastatic breast cancer and surviving nine months or more, those who received surgery of the primary tumor within nine months of diagnosis have longer subsequent survival than those who did not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Brandão
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Diogo Martins-Branco
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claudia De Angelis
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Clinical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter Vuylsteke
- CHU UCL Namur, Site Ste Elisabeth, UC Louvain, Namur, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Richard D Gelber
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, United States of America
| | | | | | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Católica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rio de Mouro, Portugal
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Didier Verhoeven
- Medical Oncology, AZ Klina, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Francois P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart-Gebhart
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alves da Costa F, Cardoso Borges F, Ramos A, Mayer A, Brito C, Ramos C, Bernardo C, Cossito M, Furtado C, Ferreira AR, Martins-Branco D, da Costa Miranda A, Lourenço A. Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:78. [PMID: 37386484 PMCID: PMC10308630 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01678-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New drugs for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have led to clinical benefits, aside with increasing costs to healthcare systems. The current financing model for health technology assessment (HTA) privileges real-world data. As part of the ongoing HTA, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and compare it with the efficacy reported in PALOMA-2. METHODS A population-based retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted including all patients initiating treatment in Portugal with palbociclib under early access use and registered in the National Oncology Registry. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes considered included time to palbociclib failure (TPF), overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier method was used and median, 1- and 2-year survival rates were computed, with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies were used. RESULTS There were 131 patients included. Median follow-up was 28.3 months (IQR: 22.7-35.2) and median duration of treatment was 17.5 months (IQR: 7.8-29.1). Median PFS was 19.5 months (95%CI 14.2-24.2), corresponding to a 1-year PFS rate of 67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2) and a 2-year PFS rate of 42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3). Sensitivity analysis showed median PFS would increase slightly when excluding those not initiating treatment with the recommended dose, raising to 19.8 months (95%CI 14.4-28.9). By considering only patients meeting PALOMA-2 criteria, we could observe a major difference in treatment outcomes, with a mean PFS of 28.8 months (95%CI 19.4-36.0). TPF was 19.8 months (95%CI 14.2-24.9). Median OS was not reached. Median TTNT was 22.5 months (95%CI 18.0-29.8). A total of 14 patients discontinued palbociclib because of AEs (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS Data suggest palbociclib with AI to have an effectiveness of 28.8 months, when used in patients with overlapping characteristics to those used in PALOMA-2. However, when used outside of these eligibility criteria, namely in patients with less favorable prognosis (e.g., presence of visceral disease), the benefits are inferior, even though still favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Alves da Costa
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMED), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Fábio Cardoso Borges
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Adriana Ramos
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Mayer
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Claudia Brito
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Ramos
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Bernardo
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mariane Cossito
- Direção de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde, Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P. (INFARMED I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cláudia Furtado
- Direção de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde, Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P. (INFARMED I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Unidade de Mama, Centro Clínico Champalimaud, Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
- Católica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Diogo Martins-Branco
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institute Jules Bordet, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ana da Costa Miranda
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - António Lourenço
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaz SC, Graff SL, Ferreira AR, Debiasi M, de Geus-Oei LF. PET/CT in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092620. [PMID: 37174086 PMCID: PMC10177398 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Significant advances in breast cancer (BC) treatment have been made in the last decade, including the use of immunotherapy and, in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors that have been shown to improve the survival of patients with triple negative BC. This narrative review summarizes the studies supporting the use of immunotherapy in BC. Furthermore, the usefulness of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) positron emission/computerized tomography (PET/CT) to image the tumor heterogeneity and to assess treatment response is explored, including the different criteria to interpret 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. The concept of immuno-PET is also described, by explaining the advantages of mapping treatment targets with a non-invasive and whole-body tool. Several radiopharmaceuticals in the preclinical phase are referred too, and, considering their promising results, translation to human studies is needed to support their use in clinical practice. Overall, this is an evolving field in BC treatment, despite PET imaging developments, the future trends also include expanding immunotherapy to early-stage BC and using other biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia C Vaz
- Nuclear Medicine-Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Center for the Unkown, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600-2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie L Graff
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI 02903, USA
- Legorreta Cancer Center, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Católica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 2635-631 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Márcio Debiasi
- Breast Cancer Unit, Champalimaud Center for the Unkown, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600-2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217-7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of radiation Science & Technology, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Postbus 5 2600 AA Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vaz-Luis I, Masiero M, Cavaletti G, Cervantes A, Chlebowski RT, Curigliano G, Felip E, Ferreira AR, Ganz PA, Hegarty J, Jeon J, Johansen C, Joly F, Jordan K, Koczwara B, Lagergren P, Lambertini M, Lenihan D, Linardou H, Loprinzi C, Partridge AH, Rauh S, Steindorf K, van der Graaf W, van de Poll-Franse L, Pentheroudakis G, Peters S, Pravettoni G. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on Cancer Survivorship: promoting high-quality survivorship care and research in Europe. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1119-1133. [PMID: 35963481 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increased number of cancer survivors and the recognition of physical and psychosocial challenges, present from cancer diagnosis through active treatment and beyond, led to the discipline of cancer survivorship. DESIGN AND METHODS Herein, we reflected on the different components of survivorship care, existing models and priorities, in order to facilitate the promotion of high-quality European survivorship care and research. RESULTS We identified five main components of survivorship care: (i) physical effects of cancer and chronic medical conditions; (ii) psychological effects of cancer; (iii) social, work and financial effects of cancer; (iv) surveillance for recurrences and second cancers; and (v) cancer prevention and overall health and well-being promotion. Survivorship care can be delivered by structured care models including but not limited to shared models integrating primary care and oncology services. The choice of the care model to be implemented has to be adapted to local realities. High-quality care should be expedited by the generation of: (i) focused and shared European recommendations, (ii) creation of tools to facilitate implementation of coordinated care and (iii) survivorship educational programs for health care teams and patients. The research agenda should be defined with the participation of health care providers, researchers, policy makers, patients and caregivers. The following patient-centered survivorship research areas were highlighted: (i) generation of a big data platform to collect long-term real-world data in survivors and healthy controls to (a) understand the resources, needs and preferences of patients with cancer, and (b) understand biological determinants of survivorship issues, and (ii) develop innovative effective interventions focused on the main components of survivorship care. CONCLUSIONS The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) can actively contribute in the efforts of the oncology community toward (a) promoting the development of high-quality survivorship care programs, (b) providing educational material and (c) aiding groundbreaking research by reflecting on priorities and by supporting research networking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vaz-Luis
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif; UMR 981, Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - M Masiero
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan
| | - G Cavaletti
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA, Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia; CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - E Felip
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon; Catolica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - P A Ganz
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Hegarty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - J Jeon
- Exercise Medicine Center for Cancer and Diabetes Patients (ICONS), Department of Sport Industry, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Shinchon Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - C Johansen
- Centre for Cancer Late Effect Research (CASTLE), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - F Joly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, U1086 Anticipe, Unicaen Normandy Universtity, Caen, France
| | - K Jordan
- Department for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam; Department of Medicine V, Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Koczwara
- Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - P Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - D Lenihan
- International Cardio-Oncology Society, Tampa, USA
| | - H Linardou
- Fourth Oncology Department & Comprehensive Clinical Trials Center, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - A H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - S Rauh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Esch, Luxembourg
| | - K Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - W van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | - L van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, Department of Psycological Research, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht; CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - S Peters
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Costa C, Ferraz AL, Ferreira AR, Roncon-Albuquerque R. Management of fulminant myocarditis: peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation and associated complications. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fulminant Myocarditis (FM) leads to cardiogenic shock with multi-organic dysfunction, being peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA-ECMO) a rescue technique. Despite growing experience, it is still related with several complications. We aim to appraise the management of patients with FM and the adverse events associated to VA-ECMO.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study in a ECMO centre in Portugal, which included 15 patients diagnosed with FM and managed on VA-ECMO from 2008 to 2018. Hemorrhage or infection on cardiac device site, cardiac tamponade, limb ischemia, ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, severe hemolysis and accidental decannulation were considered major complications.
Results
For sample characteristics and resumed complications, see Table. Inotropic and mechanical ventilation support were transversal to all, with only one patient extubated before decannulation. Six patients received renal replacement therapy, whom half recovered renal function and the remaining died. VA-ECMO operated on average for 8,5 days (range, 1 to 20 days). 3 patients had concomitant Impella heart pump and one of them had a third assistance device with Intra-Aortic Ballon pump.
Major complications were observed in 9 patients (60%), being ischemic stroke the most common. Limb ischemia, observed in 5 patients, related with longer duration of VA-ECMO support (limb ischemia vs non-limb ischemia; 12,8±4,9 vs. 6,8±6,5 days). Two patients presented hemorrhage on cardiac assistance device site, and 1 patient had a cardiac tamponade, all with fatal outcome. Infection on cardiac site, cerebral hemorrhage, severe hemolysis and accidental decannulation were not observed.
Conclusion
The most common complications were ischemic stroke and limb ischemia, both not apparently related with mortality. Differently, hemorrhage on cardiac site and cardiac tamponade were less frequent but presented ominous outcome. Overall, adverse events can be serious and hinder recovery and discharge.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Costa
- Sao Joao Hospital , Porto , Portugal
| | - A L Ferraz
- Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga , Aveiro , Portugal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cardoso Borges F, Alves da Costa F, Ramos A, Ramos C, Bernardo C, Brito C, Mayer-da-Silva A, Furtado C, Ferreira AR, Martins-Branco D, Miranda A, Lourenço A. Real-world effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer: Results from a population-based cohort study. Breast 2022; 62:135-143. [PMID: 35182993 PMCID: PMC8859011 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Real-world (RW) data may provide valuable information on the effectiveness and safety of medicines, which is particularly relevant for clinicians, patients and third-party payers. Evidence on the effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant is scarce, which highlights the need of additional studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer (ABC). Materials and methods We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study and cases of interest were identified through the Portuguese National Cancer Registry database and additional data sources. Patients aged≥18 years, diagnosed with ABC and exposed to palbociclib plus fulvestrant between May 31, 2017 and March 31, 2019 were included. Patients were followed-up until death or cut-off date (February 28, 2021). Primary outcome was rw-progression-free survival (rwPFS). Secondary outcomes were rw-overall survival (rwOS), rw-time to palbociclib failure (rwTPF) and rw-time to next treatment (rwTTNT). Results A total of 210 patients were included. Median age was 58 years (range 29–83) and 99.05% were female. Median follow-up time was 23.22 months and, at cut-off date, treatment had been discontinued in 189 patients, mainly due to disease progression (n = 152). Median rwPFS was 7.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.28–9.05) and 2-year rwPFS was 16.65% (95%CI 11.97–22.00). Median rwOS was 24.70 months (95%CI 21.58–29.27), median rwTPF was 7.5 months (95%CI 6.51–9.08) and median rwTTNT was 11.74 months (95%CI 10.33–14.08). Conclusion Palbociclib plus fulvestrant seems an effective treatment for ABC in real-world context. Compared to registrations studies, rwPFS and rwOS were shorter in real-life setting. Palbociclib plus fulvestrant seems to be an effective therapy for ABC in real-world. Median rwPFS and rwOS were estimated at 7.43 and 24.70 months, respectively. Our data suggest lower effectiveness in real-world than the efficacy reported. Treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 8.09% of patients, suggesting good tolerability. Registries may generate effectiveness data and support clinical and HTA decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fábio Cardoso Borges
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Filipa Alves da Costa
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal; Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Health Technologies, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon (FFULisboa), Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Adriana Ramos
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Catarina Ramos
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Catarina Bernardo
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Cláudia Brito
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Alexandra Mayer-da-Silva
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Cláudia Furtado
- Health Technology Assessment Department, Autoridade Nacional Do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde (INFARMED), Parque da Saúde de Lisboa, Avenida Do Brasil, 53, 1749-004, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Diogo Martins-Branco
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institute Jules Bordet, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium; Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Ana Miranda
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - António Lourenço
- National Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Research Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisboa, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campo Mártires da Pátria 130, 1169-056, Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zanudo JGT, Barroso-Sousa R, Jain E, Buendia-Buendia J, Li T, Tayob N, Rees R, Pereslete A, Ferreira AR, Abravanel DL, Helvie K, Partridge AH, Overmoyer B, Winer EP, Wagle N, Tolaney SM. Abstract P4-01-06: Genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals known and novel resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and sensitivity factors for the response to triplet therapy (palbociclib + everolimus + exemestane) in a phase I/IIb study in hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p4-01-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Multiple studies in HR+/HER2- MBC have identified a variety of genomic resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors, but the complete landscape of resistance mechanisms is still being elucidated. A clinical trial evaluating the benefit of continued CDK4/6 blockade after disease progression on a prior CDK4/6i provides a unique setting to study the landscape of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods: We analyzed genomic data from a Phase I/II trial (NCT02871791) of triplet therapy: palbociclib (CDK4/6i) + everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) + exemestane (endocrine therapy) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− MBC who had progressed on prior CDK4/6i. For the phase IIa pts, a research tumor biopsy at baseline and serial research blood collection for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis were mandatory. Additionally, when possible, we acquired tumor biopsies that preceded the patient's prior exposure to a CDK4/6i, which would allow us to identify acquired genomic resistance mechanisms to the prior CDK4/6i. The genomic data consisted of whole exome sequencing (WES) data from 23 tumor biopsies (19 pts) and 17 ctDNA samples (12 pts), and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) from 27 tumors (22 pts). 4 pts had a biopsy or ctDNA sample at baseline and a biopsy that preceded their prior exposure to a CDK4/6i. WES data was used to identify mutations and copy number alterations, which was used to perform evolutionary analysis on the pts with multiple biopsies or ctDNA samples. RNA-seq data was used to make research-grade PAM50 calls and calculate gene expression signature scores. Results: For the baseline biopsy or ctDNA sample of most pts, we found genomic alterations in previously identified pathways and genes that could explain the tumor’s resistance to the prior CDK4/6i (16/19 pts) or to the prior endocrine therapies (17/19 pts). These pathways and genes include the PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway (e.g. PTEN, AKT), the RAS/MAPK pathway (e.g. NF1), receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) (e.g. ERBB2, FGFR1), cell-cycle genes (e.g. RB1), and estrogen receptor signaling (e.g. ESR1, FOXA1). Two novel potential genomic resistance mechanisms in these pathways were identified: an activating MTOR T1977R mutation (PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway) and an activating BRAF V600E mutation (RAS/MAPK pathway). Notably, the patient with the activating MTOR mutation responded to the triplet therapy (progression free survival of 8 months), consistent with prior work linking these mutations to sensitivity to everolimus. Evolutionary analysis revealed metastatic tumors with distinct lineages but derived from the same primary tumor (e.g. two lineages, one with activating ESR1 mutations and one with an activating MTOR mutation), some of which converged to activating the same pathway (e.g. two lineages with distinct activating ERBB2 mutations). Transcriptomic analysis found that activating mutations in ERBB2 and BRAF were correlated with the HER2-E PAM50 and that the expression signatures for MTOR and RTKs were correlated with clinical benefit to triplet therapy. Conclusions: Analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic data of baseline biopsies and ctDNA samples from NCT02871791 not only recapitulates genes and pathways previously implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6i but also identified novel potential mechanisms of resistance including activating mutations in BRAF and MTOR. Evolutionary analysis demonstrates the complexity of resistance including both convergent and divergent paths to resistance. Integration of genomic and transcriptomic data may better identify pts likely to respond to CDK4/6i combinations.
Citation Format: Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Esha Jain, Jorge Buendia-Buendia, Tianyu Li, Nabihah Tayob, Rebecca Rees, Alyssa Pereslete, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Daniel L. Abravanel, Karla Helvie, Ann H. Partridge, Beth Overmoyer, Eric P. Winer, Nikhil Wagle, Sara M. Tolaney. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals known and novel resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and sensitivity factors for the response to triplet therapy (palbociclib + everolimus + exemestane) in a phase I/IIb study in hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Esha Jain
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Tianyu Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Condorelli M, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Ferrari A, Grinshpun A, Hamy AS, de Azambuja E, Carrasco E, Peccatori FA, Meglio AD, Paluch-Shimon S, Poorvu PD, Venturelli M, Rousset-Jablonski C, Senechal C, Livraghi L, Ponzone R, De Marchis L, Pogoda K, Sonnenblick A, Villarreal-Garza C, Córdoba O, Teixeira L, Clatot F, Punie K, Galbiati RG, Dieci MV, Pérez-Fidalgo A, Duhoux FP, Puglisi F, Ferreira AR, Blondeaux E, Peretz-Yablonski T, Caron O, Saule C, Ameye L, Balmaña J, Partridge AH, Azim HA, Demeestere I, Lambertini M. Abstract PD5-06: Safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) following treatment completion in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants having a pregnancy after breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd5-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Young breast cancer (BC) survivors are at risk of infertility. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care. Research efforts have shown no negative prognostic effect of pregnancy following BC therapy, also among BRCA carriers. Currently, poor evidence is available on the safety to undergo ART following BC treatment, with no data in carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic variants. To provide evidence on the safety of fertility treatments in this specific population, we assessed the outcomes of a cohort of BRCA-mutated BC survivors who had a pregnancy after prior BC history by comparing the group of patients who underwent ART to achieve pregnancy to the group with spontaneous pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤ 40 years with stage I-III BC, between January 2000 and December 2012, bearing germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Survivors with a pregnancy (any outcome) after BC, with no disease-free survival (DFS) event before pregnancy, were assigned to the ART and non-ART group if their pregnancy was achieved through ART or spontaneously, respectively. ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). RESULTS: Of 1,424 patients registered in the study, 168 with a pregnancy after BC were included in the present analysis. A total of 22 patients were included in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Before BC diagnosis, 18.2% patients in the ART group had at least one child, compared to 38.4% in the non-ART group (P=0.030). Patients had a median age at BC diagnosis of 33.0 vs 30.2 years old in the ART group and in the non-ART group, respectively (P=0.004); 45.4% and 17.1% had grade 1-2 tumors, respectively (P=0.008), and 59.1% vs 31.5% had hormone receptor-positive tumors, respectively (P=0.016). Both cohorts had similar tumor size and nodal stage characteristics. Type and duration of endocrine therapy were comparable between groups. The type of ART was not specified in 5 survivors (22.7%). Ovulation induction was used in 1 patient (4.5%), ovarian stimulation in 7 patients (31.8%), embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte donation in 5 patients (22.7%), and embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation in 4 patients (18.2%). Median age at conception among survivors was 39.7 years in the ART group versus 35.4 years in the non-ART group (P<0.001). Overall, no differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between groups, although there were more delivery complications in the ART group vs the non-ART group (22.1% vs 4.1%, respectively, P=0.011). Median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6) for patients in the ART group vs 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6) in the non-ART group (P=0.009). In the ART group, 2 patients (9.1%) experienced a DFS event (both were loco-regional recurrences) as compared to 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group (P=0.182). No patients died in the ART group compared to 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the safety of ART in BC survivors bearing germline BRCA pathogenic variants. Even though the exposed cohort was small, results showed that the use of ART does not appear to increase the relapse risk at short-term follow-up. Further reproductive studies in BRCA-mutated BC patients are warranted.
Citation Format: Margherita Condorelli, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Alberta Ferrari, Albert Grinshpun, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Evandro de Azambuja, Estela Carrasco, Fedro A. Peccatori, Antonio Di Meglio, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Philip D. Poorvu, Marta Venturelli, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Claire Senechal, Luca Livraghi, Riccardo Ponzone, Laura De Marchis, Katarzyna Pogoda, Amir Sonnenblick, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Octavi Córdoba, Luis Teixeira, Florian Clatot, Kevin Punie, Rossella Graffeo Galbiati, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Francois P. Duhoux, Fabio Puglisi, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Eva Blondeaux, Tamar Peretz-Yablonski, Olivier Caron, Claire Saule, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Ann H. Partridge, Hatem A. Azim, Jr, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini. Safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) following treatment completion in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants having a pregnancy after breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Condorelli
- Hôpital Erasme, Fertility Clinic, and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Albert Grinshpun
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fedro A. Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Philip D. Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Marta Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, and INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | | | - Luca Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Laura De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Department of Research and Breast Tumors, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia and, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Octavi Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rossella Graffeo Galbiati
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua and Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA University Hospital of Valencia, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - Francois P. Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Arlindo R. Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Tamar Peretz-Yablonski
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Olivier Caron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Hatem A. Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Hôpital Erasme, Fertility Clinic, and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova and Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Condorelli M, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Ferrari A, Grinshpun A, Hamy AS, de Azambuja E, Carrasco E, Peccatori FA, Di Meglio A, Paluch-Shimon S, Poorvu PD, Venturelli M, Rousset-Jablonski C, Senechal C, Livraghi L, Ponzone R, De Marchis L, Pogoda K, Sonnenblick A, Villarreal-Garza C, Córdoba O, Teixeira L, Clatot F, Punie K, Graffeo R, Dieci MV, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, Duhoux FP, Puglisi F, Ferreira AR, Blondeaux E, Peretz-Yablonski T, Caron O, Saule C, Ameye L, Balmaña J, Partridge AH, Azim HA, Demeestere I, Lambertini M. Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100300. [PMID: 34775302 PMCID: PMC8593447 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy. RESULTS Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSION This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Condorelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - M Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - A Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Grinshpun
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A S Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - P D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - C Rousset-Jablonski
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard and INSERM U1290 RESHAPE, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - C Senechal
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy; University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - R Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - L De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - K Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - C Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - O Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - L Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - F Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - K Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - M V Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - J A Pérez-Fidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA University Hospital of Valencia, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain
| | - F P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - A R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - E Blondeaux
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - T Peretz-Yablonski
- Breast Oncology Unit Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - O Caron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| | - I Demeestere
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Di Meglio A, Menvielle G, Dumas A, Gbenou A, Pinto S, Bovagnet T, Martin E, Ferreira AR, Vanlemmens L, Arsene O, Ibrahim M, Wassermann J, Martin AL, Lemonnier J, Del Mastro L, Jones LW, Partridge AH, Ligibel JA, Andre F, Michiels S, Vaz Luis I. Body weight and return to work among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. ESMO Open 2021; 5:e000908. [PMID: 33172957 PMCID: PMC7656950 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many breast cancer (BC) survivors are employed at diagnosis and are expected to return to work after treatment. Among them, around 50% are overweight or obese. There are limited data about the impact of body weight on their ability to return to work. METHODS We used data from CANcer TOxicity (NCT01993498), a prospective, multicentre cohort of women with stage I-III BC. Professionally active women who were ≥5 years younger than retirement age were identified. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations of body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis and subsequent weight changes with non-return to work 2 years after diagnosis, adjusting for psychosocial, treatment and behavioural characteristics. RESULTS Among 1869 women, 689 were overweight or obese. Overall, 398 patients (21.3%) had not returned to work 2 years after diagnosis. Non-return to work was more likely for overweight or obese than underweight or normal weight patients (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.75; p=0.045). Weight loss (≥5%) was observed in 15.7% overweight or obese and 8.7% underweight or normal weight patients and was associated with significant increases in physical activity only among overweight or obese patients (mean change, +4.7 metabolic-equivalent-of-task-hour/week; 95% CI +1.9 to +7.5). Overweight or obese patients who lost weight were more likely to return to work compared with those who did not lose weight (aOR of non-return-to-work, 0.48; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.97, p=0.0418), whereas weight loss was associated with increased odds of non-return to work among underweight or normal weight women (aOR 2.07; 95% CI 1.20 to 3.56, p=0.0086) (pinteractionBMI×weight changes=0.0002). The continuous trend of weight gain on non-return to work was significant for overweight or obese patients (aOR for one-percent-unit difference, 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06, p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS Excess weight may be a barrier to return to work. Among overweight or obese BC survivors, weight loss was associated with higher rates of return to work, whereas further weight gain was associated with lower likelihood of return to work. Employment outcomes should be evaluated in randomised studies of weight management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Di Meglio
- Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Gwenn Menvielle
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Agnes Dumas
- INSERM Unit 1018, Villejuif, France; UMR Unit 1123, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot UFR de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Arnauld Gbenou
- Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sandrine Pinto
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Bovagnet
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Elise Martin
- Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | - Mahmoud Ibrahim
- Regional Hospital Centre Orleans Porte Madeleine Hospital, Orleans, France
| | | | | | | | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico per l'Oncologia, Genova, Italy
| | - Lee W Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Fabrice Andre
- Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Stefan Michiels
- University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of biostatistics and epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Oncostat Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France
| | - Ines Vaz Luis
- Prédicteurs moléculaires et nouvelles cibles en oncologie, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ferreira HDS, Ferrer F, Cabanelas N, Nelumba T, Ferreira AR, Faustino M, Antunes S, Vasconcelos H, Beringuilho M, Polena C, Borralho C, Madeira F, Morais C. Artificial intelligence: an attempt to automate remote device follow-up. Europace 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab116.517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) through machine learning (ML) refers to the simulation of human intelligence with the capacity for achieving goals within computers. In electrophysiology, ML has many applications in electrocardiography, intracardiac mapping and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).
Remote monitoring (RM) of patients equipped with CIEDs associates the analysis of event reports and calendar-based remote follow-ups (FU). ML applications have allowed for risk stratification, improved arrhythmia localisation and streamlined remote monitoring which may significantly reduce the workload faced by electrophysiologists.
Aim
To develop a system that automates cardiac implantable electronic devices remote follow-up.
Methods and Results
We created a Java software application, that uses the latest optical character recognition techniques combined with artificial intelligence and natural language processing to extract information from PDF reports of RM of CIEDs from different manufacturers. The current version is HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) complaint and runs on local computers only.
Using the current system, we were able to run and extract data from 30 remote follow-up PDF reports of Cardiac Implantable Defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillator (CRT-Ds).
Time taken from data extraction to conversion of all 30 device PDFs was under 5 minutes.
Process and data extracted are presented in the figure below. (Figure 1)
Conclusion
This machine learning algorithm proved that it is possible to facilitate and automate remote follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices.
In a near future this will allow to us to efficiently increase productivity, by speeding and facilitating interpretation of remote device follow-ups, leading to improvements in patientcare and precision cardiovascular medicine.
Furthermore, in the current and future pandemics it may help prevent unnecessary in-person medical visits, avoiding additional, unnecessary strain on an already overburdened and overwhelmed healthcare system, and saving costs. Abstract Figure 1
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HDS Ferreira
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - F Ferrer
- Immutable Data Inc., Ontario, Canada
| | - N Cabanelas
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - T Nelumba
- Hospital de Santa Cruz, Pediatric Cardiology Department, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - AR Ferreira
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - M Faustino
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - S Antunes
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - H Vasconcelos
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - M Beringuilho
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - C Polena
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - C Borralho
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - F Madeira
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| | - C Morais
- Hospital Prof Fernando da Fonseca EPE, Amadora, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Hamy AS, Caron O, Poorvu PD, Carrasco E, Grinshpun A, Punie K, Rousset-Jablonski C, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Toss A, Senechal C, Puglisi F, Pogoda K, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, De Marchis L, Ponzone R, Livraghi L, Estevez-Diz MDP, Villarreal-Garza C, Dieci MV, Clatot F, Duhoux FP, Graffeo R, Teixeira L, Córdoba O, Sonnenblick A, Ferreira AR, Partridge AH, Meglio AD, Saule C, Peccatori FA, Bruzzone M, Mastro LD, Ameye L, Balmaña J, Azim HA. Abstract PD10-06: Clinical behavior and outcomes of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in young patients according to type of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status: Results from an international cohort study. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-pd10-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Young breast cancer patients (pts) carrying a germline BRCA mutation (mBRCA) have similar outcomes as non-carriers. However, there is currently lack of evidence regarding the impact of mBRCA type and hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of mBRCA breast cancer. We aim to address these questions in the largest dataset to date of young mBRCA breast cancer pts.
Methods: This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Women harboring deleterious germline mBRCA1 or mBRCA2 that received a diagnosis of stage I-III invasive early breast cancer at age ≤40 years between January 2000 and December 2012 were included. Baseline pts, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pattern and risk over time of disease-free survival (DFS) events, and survival outcomes (DFS, distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI] and overall survival [OS]) were compared between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts overall and by hormone receptor status. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard rates (HRs).
Results: 1,236 young mBRCA breast cancer pts were included. Among 808 and 428 pts with mBRCA1 or mBRCA2, respectively, 191 (23.6%) and 356 (83.2%) had hormone receptor-positive tumors while 617 (76.4%) and 72 (16.8%) hormone receptor-negative disease (p<0.001). Compared to mBRCA2 breast cancer pts, those with mBRCA1 were younger, more likely to have reported Jewish ancestry, had more grade 3 tumors, less nodal involvement, lobular histology and HER2 positivity, and received more frequently chemotherapy (all p<0.001). More mBRCA1 pts with hormone receptor-positive tumors did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (14.7% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001). No difference between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts was observed in risk-reducing mastectomy (43.9% vs. 46.0%; p=0.371) or salpingo-oophorectomy (48.3% vs. 48.8%; p=1.0). Median follow-up was 7.9 years (range 5.6-10.6 years). Second primary breast cancers (17.0% vs. 12.2%, p=0.025) and non-breast primary malignancies (4.3% vs. 1.9%, p=0.033) were more frequent among mBRCA1 pts compared to mBRCA2 pts, while distant recurrences were less frequent (10.4% vs. 15.4%, p=0.013). 8-year DFS was 62.8% and 65.9% for mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.96). The worse DFS in mBRCA1 was observed regardless of hormone receptor status (pinteraction=0.848): hormone receptor-positive (adjusted HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.58-1.03) and hormone receptor-negative (adjusted HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.13). No differences in DRFI and OS were observed between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts. Compared to pts with hormone receptor-negative disease, those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer had higher chances of developing distant (± loco-regional) recurrences (16.1% vs. 9.0%; p<0.001) and less frequent second primary malignancies (BC: 12.1% vs. 17.9%, p=0.005; non-BC: 2.8% vs. 4.0%, p=0.216). No differences in DFS and OS were observed between pts with hormone receptor-positive or negative breast cancer. However, there was a trend towards worse DRFI in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer as compared to those with hormone receptor-negative disease (8-year DRFI: 83.4% vs. 90.1%; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.94-2.05).
Conclusions: In this large unique dataset, young mBRCA1 breast cancer pts had worse DFS than those with mBRCA2 mostly due to higher rates of second primary malignancies. Hormone receptor positivity had no positive prognostic value in young mBRCA breast cancer pts with a trend towards worse DRFI in those with hormone receptor-negative disease. These results provide important information for counseling young mBRCA breast cancer pts regarding treatment, prevention and follow-up care strategies.
Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Olivier Caron, Philip D. Poorvu, Estela Carrasco, Albert Grinshpun, Kevin Punie, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Alberta Ferrari, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Angela Toss, Claire Senechal, Fabio Puglisi, Katarzyna Pogoda, Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Laura De Marchis, Riccardo Ponzone, Luca Livraghi, Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Florian Clatot, Francois P. Duhoux, Rossella Graffeo, Luis Teixeira, Octavi Córdoba, Amir Sonnenblick, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Ann H. Partridge, Antonio Di Meglio, Claire Saule, Fedro A. Peccatori, Marco Bruzzone, Lucia Del Mastro, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Hatem A. Azim, Jr. Clinical behavior and outcomes of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in young patients according to type of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status: Results from an international cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- 1University of Genova - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- 1University of Genova - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | - Philip D. Poorvu
- 4Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Estela Carrasco
- 5Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Kevin Punie
- 7Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- 9Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Angela Toss
- 11Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Puglisi
- 13Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Avano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- 14Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
- 19Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo – Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Rossella Graffeo
- 24Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Luis Teixeira
- 25Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Ann H. Partridge
- 4Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Marco Bruzzone
- 1University of Genova - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- 1University of Genova - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lieveke Ameye
- 31Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Judith Balmaña
- 5Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hatem A. Azim
- 32Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Hamy AS, Caron O, Poorvu PD, Carrasco E, Grinshpun A, Punie K, Rousset-Jablonski C, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Toss A, Senechal C, Puglisi F, Pogoda K, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, De Marchis L, Ponzone R, Livraghi L, Estevez-Diz MDP, Villarreal-Garza C, Dieci MV, Clatot F, Duhoux FP, Graffeo R, Teixeira L, Córdoba O, Sonnenblick A, Ferreira AR, Partridge AH, Di Meglio A, Saule C, Peccatori FA, Bruzzone M, t'Kint de Roodenbeke MD, Ameye L, Balmaña J, Del Mastro L, Azim HA. Clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:16. [PMID: 33579978 PMCID: PMC7880991 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00224-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Young breast cancer (BC) patients carrying a germline BRCA pathogenic variant (mBRCA) have similar outcomes as non-carriers. However, the impact of the type of gene (BRCA1 vs. BRCA2) and hormone receptor status (positive [HR+] vs. negative [HR-]) on clinical behavior and outcomes of mBRCA BC remains largely unknown. This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study that included mBRCA patients diagnosed, between January 2000 and December 2012, with stage I-III invasive early BC at age ≤40 years. From 30 centers worldwide, 1236 young mBRCA BC patients were included. Among 808 and 428 patients with mBRCA1 or mBRCA2, 191 (23.6%) and 356 (83.2%) had HR+tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 7.9 years. Second primary BC (P = 0.009) and non-BC malignancies (P = 0.02) were more frequent among mBRCA1 patients while distant recurrences were less frequent (P = 0.02). Irrespective of hormone receptor status, mBRCA1 patients had worse disease-free survival (DFS; adjusted HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96), with no difference in distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS). Patients with HR+ disease had more frequent distant recurrences (P < 0.001) and less frequent second primary malignancies (BC: P = 0.005; non-BC: P = 0.18). No differences in DFS and OS were observed according to hormone receptor status, with a tendency for worse DRFI (adjusted HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.94-2.05) in patients with HR+ BC. Type of mBRCA gene and hormone receptor status strongly impact BC clinical behavior and outcomes in mBRCA young patients. These results provide important information for patients' counseling on treatment, prevention, and surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Olivier Caron
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Grinshpun
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III - Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, aBRCAdaBRA onlus, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Oncology Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre and Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Laura De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ponzone
- Gynecological Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Livraghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz
- Departament of Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Pacaembu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Department of Research and Breast Tumors, Mexican National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, NL, Mexico
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Francois P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Clinic, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Breast Disease Unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Octavi Córdoba
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Oncology Division, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Predictive Biomarkers and New Therapeutic Strategies in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Saule
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Lieveke Ameye
- Data Centre, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, NL, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gouveia PF, Costa J, Morgado P, Kates R, Pinto D, Mavioso C, Anacleto J, Martinho M, Lopes DS, Ferreira AR, Vavourakis V, Hadjicharalambous M, Silva MA, Papanikolaou N, Alves C, Cardoso F, Cardoso MJ. Breast cancer surgery with augmented reality. Breast 2021; 56:14-17. [PMID: 33548617 PMCID: PMC7890000 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Innovations in 3D spatial technology and augmented reality imaging driven by digital high-tech industrial science have accelerated experimental advances in breast cancer imaging and the development of medical procedures aimed to reduce invasiveness. Presentation of case: A 57-year-old post-menopausal woman presented with screen-detected left-sided breast cancer. After undergoing all staging and pre-operative studies the patient was proposed for conservative breast surgery with tumor localization. During surgery, an experimental digital and non-invasive intra-operative localization method with augmented reality was compared with the standard pre-operative localization with carbon tattooing (institutional protocol). The breast surgeon wearing an augmented reality headset (Hololens) was able to visualize the tumor location projection inside the patient’s left breast in the usual supine position. Discussion: This work describes, to our knowledge, the first experimental test with a digital non-invasive method for intra-operative breast cancer localization using augmented reality to guide breast conservative surgery. In this case, a successful overlap of the previous standard pre-operative marks with carbon tattooing and tumor visualization inside the patient’s breast with augmented reality was obtained. Conclusion: Breast cancer conservative guided surgery with augmented reality can pave the way for a digital non-invasive method for intra-operative tumor localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro F Gouveia
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon University,Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Joana Costa
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Pedro Morgado
- AI4medimaging,Rua do Parque Poente, Lote 35, 4705-002, Braga, Portugal.
| | - Ronald Kates
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - David Pinto
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Carlos Mavioso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - João Anacleto
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Marta Martinho
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Daniel Simões Lopes
- INESC ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon University,Rua Alves Redol 9, 1000-029, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon University,Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Vasileios Vavourakis
- Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus,Dept. of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering University of Cyprus, Cyprus; Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London,Malet Place Engineering Building, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
| | - Myrianthi Hadjicharalambous
- Department of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus,Dept. of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering University of Cyprus, Cyprus.
| | - Marco A Silva
- Microsoft Corporation (Portugal),Rua do Fogo de Santelmo, Lote 2.07.02, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Nickolas Papanikolaou
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Celeste Alves
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal.
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation,Avenida Brasilia, 1400-038, Lisboa, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria 130, 1169-056, Lisboa, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
R Ferreira A, Ferreira S, Lambertini M, Maurer C, Martel S, Costa L, Ponde N, de Azambuja E. Association between pertuzumab-associated diarrhoea and rash and survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Exploratory analysis from the CLEOPATRA trial. Eur J Cancer 2021; 144:351-359. [PMID: 33388492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin rash and diarrhoea are known side-effects of pertuzumab. Studies with other anti-HER2 agents suggested that adverse events correlate with patient outcomes. In this exploratory cohort of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer included in the CLEOPATRA trial we evaluated the value of rash and diarrhoea as prognostic markers and as predictors of pertuzumab benefit. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of the multicenter, prospective, randomised CLEOPATRA trial. We defined two analytic cohorts: cohort 1 (C1) included patients from treatment initiation, and cohort 2 (C2) included patients after discontinuation of docetaxel. A landmark analysis was introduced to deal with immortal-time bias. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS Of the 808 patients and after application of the landmark analysis, C1 and C2 included 777 and 518 patients, respectively. In C1, rash occurred in 271 patients (34.9%) and diarrhoea in 470 (60.5%). Rash was prognostic for PFS and OS (C1: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.66 [95% CI = 0.48-0.91], p = 0.010]; C2: aHR 0.52 [95% CI = 0.30-0.89], p = 0.018) in both cohorts, while diarrhoea was only prognostic for PFS in cohort 2 (aHR = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.46-0.91], p = 0.011). Rash and diarrhoea were not predictive of pertuzumab benefit (in terms of PFS/OS) in the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS In patients treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, rash is prognostic whenever it occurs during treatment, while diarrhoea only has prognostic value when occurring after docetaxel discontinuation. However, neither rash nor diarrhoea predict pertuzumab benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R Ferreira
- Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Belgium; Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal
| | - Sofia Ferreira
- Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Belgium; Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Portugal
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Belgium; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Christian Maurer
- Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Belgium; Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf and University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Samuel Martel
- Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Belgium; CISSS Montérégie-centre/Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne, Canada
| | - Luis Costa
- Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Noam Ponde
- Institut Jules Bordet, L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Belgium; AC Carmargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Blondeaux E, Ferreira AR, Poggio F, Puglisi F, Bighin C, Sottotetti F, Montemurro F, Poletto E, Lai A, Sini V, Minuti G, Mura S, Fontana A, Fregatti P, Cardinali B, Lambertini M, Del Mastro L. Clinical outcomes of patients with breast cancer relapsing after (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab and receiving trastuzumab rechallenge or lapatinib-based therapy: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. ESMO Open 2020; 5:S2059-7029(20)32642-9. [PMID: 32817059 PMCID: PMC7437709 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the prepertuzumab era, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who underwent first-line trastuzumab-based or lapatinib-based therapy according to prior exposure to (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Materials and methods In this multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted in 14 Italian centres of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella, consecutive patients undergoing first-line trastuzumab or lapatinib-based therapy were included. Analyses were performed according to the type of first-line therapy for metastatic disease (trastuzumab or lapatinib). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were analysed using logistic regression and time-to-event outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models controlling for relevant demographic, clinicopathological and therapy characteristics. Results Out of 450 patients included in the study, 416 (92%) received trastuzumab and 34 (7.5%) lapatinib. As compared with the trastuzumab cohort, more patients in the lapatinib cohort had a trastuzumab-free interval <1 month (37% vs 13.9%; p=0.017) and brain metastasis as first site of relapse (38.2% vs 9.4%; p<0.001). Among the 128 patients who relapsed after prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab, 101 (78.9%) received first-line trastuzumab and 27 (21.1%) first-line lapatinib. The following outcomes were observed with first-line lapatinib or trastuzumab, respectively: overall response rate 45.5% vs 61.3% (p=0.184), clinical benefit rate 68.2% vs 72.5% (p=0.691), median progression-free survival (PFS) 11.4 vs 12.0 months (p=0.814) and median overall survival (OS) 34.7 vs 48.2 months (p=0.722). In patients with brain metastasis as first site of relapse, median PFS was 12.2 vs 9.9 months (p=0.093) and median OS 33.7 vs 28.5 months (p=0.280), respectively. Conclusions In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer relapsing after prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab, first-line treatment with trastuzumab or lapatinib was not associated with a significant difference in the clinical outcomes. A non-significant trend favouring the use of lapatinib was observed in patients with brain metastasis as the first site of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Blondeaux
- U.O.S.D. Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Poggio
- U.O.S.D. Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy.,Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Claudia Bighin
- U.O.S.D. Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Federico Sottotetti
- Unità Dipartimentale di Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Filippo Montemurro
- Day Hospital Oncologico Multidisciplinare, Istituto di Candiolo FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Elena Poletto
- Department of Oncology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Antonella Lai
- Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Valentina Sini
- U.O. Centro Oncologico S. Spirito-Nuovo Regina Margherita, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Minuti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Silvia Mura
- U.O.C. Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontana
- Polo Oncologico, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgical Oncology, U.O. Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Barbara Cardinali
- U.O.S.D. Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- U.O.S.D. Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy .,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ferreira AR, Di Meglio A, Pistilli B, Gbenou AS, El-Mouhebb M, Dauchy S, Charles C, Joly F, Everhard S, Lambertini M, Coutant C, Cottu P, Lerebours F, Petit T, Dalenc F, Rouanet P, Arnaud A, Martin A, Berille J, Ganz PA, Partridge AH, Delaloge S, Michiels S, Andre F, Vaz-Luis I. Differential impact of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy on quality of life of breast cancer survivors: a prospective patient-reported outcomes analysis. Ann Oncol 2020; 30:1784-1795. [PMID: 31591636 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early breast cancer (BC), there has been a trend to escalate endocrine therapy (ET) and to de-escalate chemotherapy (CT). However, the impact of ET versus CT on the quality of life (QoL) of early BC patients is unknown. Here, we characterize the independent contribution of ET and CT on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 years after diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively collected PROs in 4262 eligible patients using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30/BR23 questionnaires inside CANTO trial (NCT01993498). The primary outcome was the C30 summary score (C30-SumSc) at 2 years after diagnosis. RESULTS From eligible patients, 37.2% were premenopausal and 62.8% postmenopausal; 81.9% received ET and 52.8% CT. In the overall cohort, QoL worsened by 2 years after diagnosis in multiple functions and symptoms; exceptions included emotional function and future perspective, which improved over time. ET (Pint = 0.004), but not CT (Pint = 0.924), had a persistent negative impact on the C30-SumSc. In addition, ET negatively impacted role and social function, pain, insomnia, systemic therapy side-effects, breast symptoms and further limited emotional function and future perspective recovery. Although CT had no impact on the C30-SumSc at 2-years it was associated with deteriorated physical and cognitive function, dyspnea, financial difficulties, body image and breast symptoms. We found a differential effect of treatment by menopausal status; in premenopausal patients, CT, despite only a non-significant trend for deteriorated C30-SumSc (Pint = 0.100), was more frequently associated with QoL domains deterioration than ET, whereas in postmenopausal patients, ET was more frequently associated with QoL deterioration, namely using the C30-SumSc (Pint = 0.004). CONCLUSION(S) QoL deterioration persisted at 2 years after diagnosis with different trajectories by treatment received. ET, but not CT, had a major detrimental impact on C30-SumSc, especially in postmenopausal women. These findings highlight the need to properly select patients for adjuvant ET escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Ferreira
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A Di Meglio
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - B Pistilli
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A S Gbenou
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - M El-Mouhebb
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Dauchy
- Department of Supportive Care, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - C Charles
- Department of Supportive Care, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - F Joly
- Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse Caen, Caen
| | | | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - C Coutant
- Surgical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - P Cottu
- Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - F Lerebours
- Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud
| | - T Petit
- Department of Medicine, Paul Strauss Cancer Center and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - F Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer - Oncopole, Toulouse
| | - P Rouanet
- Surgical Oncology, C.R.L.C Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier
| | - A Arnaud
- Radiotherapy Department, Clinique Sainte Catherine Avignon, Avignon
| | | | - J Berille
- Ministry of Higher Education and Research, Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche, Paris, France
| | - P A Ganz
- Medical Oncology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - A H Partridge
- Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S Delaloge
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - S Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif; CESP, INSERM, U1018 ONCOSTAT, Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - F Andre
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - I Vaz-Luis
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Meglio A, Michiels S, Jones LW, El-Mouhebb M, Ferreira AR, Martin E, Matias M, Lohmann AE, Joly F, Vanlemmens L, Everhard S, Martin AL, Lemonnier J, Arveux P, Cottu PH, Coutant C, Del Mastro L, Partridge AH, André F, Ligibel JA, Vaz-Luis I. Changes in weight, physical and psychosocial patient-reported outcomes among obese women receiving treatment for early-stage breast cancer: A nationwide clinical study. Breast 2020; 52:23-32. [PMID: 32344296 PMCID: PMC7375600 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on how weight loss correlates to health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) among obese breast cancer (BC) patients is limited. We aimed to evaluate associations between weight changes and HRQOL. METHODS We included 993 obese women with stage I-II-III BC from CANTO, a multicenter, prospective cohort collecting longitudinal, objectively-assessed anthropometric measures and HRQOL data (NCT01993498). Associations between weight changes (±5% between diagnosis and post-treatment [shortly after completion of surgery, adjuvant chemo- or radiation-therapy]) and patient-reported HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30/B23) were comprehensively evaluated. Changes in HRQOL and odds of severely impaired HRQOL were assessed using multivariable generalized estimating equations and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS 14.1% women gained weight, 67.3% remained stable and 18.6% lost weight. Significant decreases in functional status and exacerbation of symptoms were observed overall post-treatment. Compared to gaining weight or remaining stable, obese women who lost weight experienced less of a decline in HRQOL, reporting better physical function (mean change [95%CI] for gain, stability and loss: -12.9 [-16.5,-9.3], -6.9 [-8.2,-5.5] and -6.2 [-8.7,-3.7]; pinteraction[weight-change-by-time] = 0.006), less dyspnea (+18.9 [+12.3,+25.6], +9.2 [+6.5,+11.9] and +3.2 [-1.0,+7.3]; pinteraction = 0.0003), and fewer breast symptoms (+22.1 [+16.8,+27.3], +18.0 [+15.7,+20.3] and +13.4 [+9.0,+17.2]; pinteraction = 0.044). Weight loss was also significantly associated with reduced odds of severe pain compared with weight gain (OR [95%CI] = 0.51 [0.31-0.86], p = 0.011) or stability (OR [95%CI] = 0.62 [0.41-0.95], p = 0.029). No associations between weight loss and worsening of other physical or psychosocial parameters were found. CONCLUSIONS This large contemporary study suggests that weight loss among obese BC patients during early survivorship was associated with better patient-reported outcomes, without evidence of worsened functionality or symptomatology in any domain of HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lee W Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | | | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università Degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lobo-Martins S, Ferreira AR, Mansinho A, Casimiro S, Leitzel K, Ali S, Lipton A, Costa L. Impact of Extraskeletal Metastases on Skeletal-Related Events in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082034. [PMID: 32722128 PMCID: PMC7463577 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has substantially evolved over the last decade. Nonetheless, a better understanding of bone-targeted agents (BTAs) action in mCRPC remains an unmet need. Theuse of BTAs aims to reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with mCRPC. Less frequent BTA schedules are currently being studied to minimize adverse events. In this study, the impact of metastatic compartment (bone and extraskeletal metastases (BESM) vs. bone-only metastases (BOM)) on bone biomarker kinetics, time to first on-study SRE, and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) is evaluated. This is a retrospective analysis of the prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid in patients with mCRPC and bone metastases. A total of 1901 patients were included, 1559 (82.0%) with BOM and 342 with BESM (18.0%). Bone metastases burden was balanced between groups. Baseline levels and normalization rates of corrected urinary N-terminal telopeptide and bone alkaline phosphatase did not differ between groups. However, BESM patients had a higher risk of SREs (adjusted HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01–1.46; p = 0.043) and SSEs (adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06–1.61; p = 0.014). This difference was more pronounced in the first 12 months of BTA treatment.In mCRPC, strategies of BTA schedule de-escalation may take into account presence of extraskeletal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soraia Lobo-Martins
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal; (S.L.-M.); (A.M.)
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.R.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Arlindo R. Ferreira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.R.F.); (S.C.)
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - André Mansinho
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal; (S.L.-M.); (A.M.)
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.R.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Sandra Casimiro
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.R.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Kim Leitzel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA17033, USA; (K.L.); (S.A.); (A.L.)
| | - Suhail Ali
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA17033, USA; (K.L.); (S.A.); (A.L.)
| | - Allan Lipton
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA17033, USA; (K.L.); (S.A.); (A.L.)
| | - Luís Costa
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal; (S.L.-M.); (A.M.)
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.R.F.); (S.C.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pistilli B, Paci A, Ferreira AR, Di Meglio A, Poinsignon V, Bardet A, Menvielle G, Dumas A, Pinto S, Dauchy S, Fasse L, Cottu PH, Lerebours F, Coutant C, Lesur A, Tredan O, Soulie P, Vanlemmens L, Jouannaud C, Levy C, Everhard S, Arveux P, Martin AL, Dima A, Lin NU, Partridge AH, Delaloge S, Michiels S, André F, Vaz-Luis I. Serum Detection of Nonadherence to Adjuvant Tamoxifen and Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2762-2772. [PMID: 32568632 PMCID: PMC7430219 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nonadherence to long-term treatments is often under-recognized by physicians and there is no gold standard for its assessment. In breast cancer, nonadherence to tamoxifen therapy after surgery constitutes a major obstacle to optimal outcomes. We sought to evaluate the rate of biochemical nonadherence to adjuvant tamoxifen using serum assessment and to examine its effects on short-term, distant disease-free survival (DDFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied 1,177 premenopausal women enrolled in a large prospective study (CANTO/NCT01993498). Definition of biochemical nonadherence was based on a tamoxifen serum level < 60 ng/mL, assessed 1 year after prescription. Self-reported nonadherence to tamoxifen therapy was collected at the same time through semistructured interviews. Survival analyses were conducted using an inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards model, using a propensity score based on age, staging, surgery, chemotherapy, and center size. RESULTS Serum assessment of tamoxifen identified 16.0% of patients (n = 188) below the set adherence threshold. Patient-reported rate of nonadherence was lower (12.3%). Of 188 patients who did not adhere to the tamoxifen prescription, 55% self-reported adherence to tamoxifen. After a median follow-up of 24.2 months since tamoxifen serum assessment, patients who were biochemically nonadherent had significantly shorter DDFS (for distant recurrence or death, adjusted hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.06; P = .036), with 89.5% of patients alive without distant recurrence at 3 years in the nonadherent cohort versus 95.4% in the adherent cohort. CONCLUSION Therapeutic drug monitoring may be a useful method to promptly identify patients who do not take adjuvant tamoxifen as prescribed and are at risk for poorer outcomes. Targeted interventions facilitating patient adherence are needed and have the potential to improve short-term breast cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelo Paci
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Pharmacie, Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM-Unit 981, Villejuif, France.,Fundacao Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM-Unit 981, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Aurelie Bardet
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM-Unit 1018, Villejuif, France
| | - Gwenn Menvielle
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidemiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | - Agnes Dumas
- INSERM-Unit 1018, Villejuif, France.,UMR-Unit 1123, Paris, France.,Université Paris Diderot UFR de Médecine, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine Pinto
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidemiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | | | - Leonor Fasse
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris Decartes, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Anne Lesur
- Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | | | - Patrick Soulie
- Institut de Cancerologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | | | | | - Christelle Levy
- Centre Francois Baclesse Centre Lutte Contre le Cancer, Caen, France
| | | | - Patrick Arveux
- INSERM-Unit 1018, Villejuif, France.,Georges-Francois Leclerc Centre, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stefan Michiels
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM-Unit 1018, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice André
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM-Unit 981, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ferreira AR, Pondé N, Lambertini M, Maurer C, Martel S, Costa L, De Azambuja E. Abstract P4-10-09: Association between pertuzumab (P) induced diarrhea and skin rash and survival outcomes in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer enrolled in the CLEOPATRA trial. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p4-10-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: P and trastuzumab (T) are approved for the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer (BC) pts. Skin rash and diarrhea are frequent adverse events (AE) with P. With the use of lapatinib, we demonstrated that early development of rash correlates with pathologic complete response in the NeoALTTO trial and is both a prognostic and predictive marker in the ALTTO trial. In this subanalysis of the CLEOPATRA trial, we investigated if incidence of rash and diarrhea associates with progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) and if it can predict the benefit of P+T. Methods: In the CLEOPATRA phase III trial, advanced HER2-positive BC pts where randomized between first-line T vs P+T with at least 6 cycles of docetaxel. We evaluated whether rash (any grade) and/or diarrhea (any grade or grade ≥3) were prognostic in pts receiving P+T and/or predictive of benefit from P+T vs T. To deal with immortal-time bias, we performed a landmark analysis removing pts progressing/dying before a minimum of 46 days (median time to rash/diarrhea occurrence) after treatment initiation (cohort 1), and after end of docetaxel treatment (cohort 2). Survival endpoints were PFS and OS according to study definition. We also investigated if age (<50 or ≥50 years) influences the incidence of diarrhea or rash and if the 2 AEs are associated with one another. For both AEs, the earliest event was considered for analysis. Results: Of the 808 patients in the CLEOPATRA study, cohort 1 included 777 pts (T: 379; P+T: 398) and cohort 2 included 518 pts (T: 232; P+T: 286). The table summarizes the incidence and impact of rash and diarrhea by treatment arm and their effect on outcomes after a median PFS and OS follow-up of 43.6 (IQR 22.9-50.5) and 48.4 (IQR 43.5-55.0) months, respectively, in cohort 1. It shows that rash is prognostic for both PFS and OS (P+T treated) but not predictive of P+T benefit vs T; while diarrhea is not prognostic but predicts P+T PFS benefit. In cohort 2, diarrhea and rash were prognostic for PFS (rash, HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.29-0.60], p<0.001; diarrhea 0.48 [0.35-0.65], p<0.001) and only rash for OS (rash, 0.50 [0.29-0.86], p=0.013; diarrhea, 0.64 [0.39-1.03], p=0.064), but neither were predictive of P+T benefit for PFS (rash, p for interaction of any grade x treatment [pint]=0.695; diarrhea, pint=0.194) nor OS (rash, pint=0.841; diarrhea, pint=0.155). Younger age (<50 years) was not associated with diarrhea (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.76-1.35], p=0.932), rash (1.07 [0.79-1.45], p=0.69) or both (0.92 [0.67-1.27], p=0.635). Having diarrhea (any grade) was associated with having rash (any grade; p<0.001, Cramér’s V 0.24).Conclusion: Rash is prognostic both for PFS and OS, but not predictive of pertuzumab benefit. Conversely, diarrhea predicts PFS benefit of P when occurring during docetaxel administration but is prognostic only after docetaxel withdrawal. These results may be used to reassure pts experiencing these AEs during treatment.
Incidence and Impact of Diarrhea and/or Rash on PFS and OS in cohort 1Patients, n (%)PFS, % at 2 yrsOS, % at 2 yrsPrognostic role (pertuzumab treated)RashYes, any grade169 (42.5)48.587.3No, any grade229 (57.5)37.478.0HR (95% CI), p-value (any grade vs. no)NA0.71 (0.56-0.91), p<0.0060.66 (0.48-0.91), p<0.001DiarrheaYes, any grade238 (59.8)42.683.5No, any grade160 (40.2)41.679.6Yes, grade ≥337 (9.3)50.480.8No, grade ≥3361 (90.7)41.482.1HR (95% CI), p-value (any grade vs. no)NA0.97 (0.77-1.24), p<0.8340.93 (0.68-1.28), p=0.677Predictive role (overall cohort 1)RashYes, any grade271 (34.9)45.584.6No, any grade506 (65.1)28.872.0pintNAp=0.477p=0.711DiarrheaYes, any grade406 (52.2)39.479.3No, any grade371 (47.8)29.673.4Yes, grade ≥357 (7.3)40.574.8No, grade ≥3720 (92.7)34.376.7pint (any grade vs. no)NAp=0.049p=0.564
Citation Format: Arlindo R. Ferreira, Noam Pondé, Matteo Lambertini, Christian Maurer, Samuel Martel, Luis Costa, Evandro De Azambuja. Association between pertuzumab (P) induced diarrhea and skin rash and survival outcomes in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer enrolled in the CLEOPATRA trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R. Ferreira
- 1Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Noam Pondé
- 2A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | - Luis Costa
- 6Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Evandro De Azambuja
- 7Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ferreira AR, Ribeiro J, Miranda A, Mayer A, Passos-Coelho JL, Brito M, Fernandes J, Gouveia J, Costa L, Vaz-Luis I. Effectiveness of Adjuvant Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19:e654-e667. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
25
|
Slavov SN, Christova IS, Ferreira AR, Rodrigues ES, Bianquini ML, Hespanhol MR, Covas DT, Kashima S. Serological evidence of Borrelia circulation among blood donors in the São Paulo state, Brazil. Transfus Med 2019; 29:358-363. [PMID: 31468639 DOI: 10.1111/tme.12627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the Borrelia seroprevalence among blood donors in Southeast Brazil. BACKGROUND There is evidence that Borrelia spirochetes are circulating in Brazil; however, there are no studies that characterise these bacteria and investigate their seroprevalence in the Brazilian population. Such a situation, combined with a recent outbreak of tick-borne Rocky Mountain spotted fever in the São Paulo state demonstrates the increasing role of ticks as arthropod vectors in Brazil. METHODS For the purpose of the study, 452 blood donors from Ribeirão Preto city, São Paulo state were tested using anti-Borrelia immunoglobulin G (IgG) assay. The positive results were also confirmed by Western blot for anti-borrelia IgM/IgG. RESULTS The anti-Borrelia IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed nine positive and nine borderline reactive samples, giving a total seroprevalence of 2·0% of anti-Borrelia IgG among Brazilian blood donors. The confirmation of the seropositive and borderline samples by Borrelia Western blot was demonstrated by IgG-positive results in 16 samples (a seroprevalence of 3.5%). Anti-Borrelia IgM antibodies were also detected in one sample. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that Borrelia-like spirochetes may be circulating among blood donors from the São Paulo State and that the ticks have an important epidemiological role as vectors of bacterial infections in this Brazilian region. These results not only alert us to possible actions that might be undertaken in order to completely characterise the aetiological agents of Lyme-like syndromes in Brazil but also the possible impact that these bacterial agents might have on haemotherapy practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S N Slavov
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - I S Christova
- Department of Microbiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - A R Ferreira
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - E S Rodrigues
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M L Bianquini
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M R Hespanhol
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - D T Covas
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - S Kashima
- Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Di Meglio A, Menvielle G, Dumas A, Gbenou AS, Bovagnet T, Martin E, Ferreira AR, Vanlemmens L, Arsene O, Ibrahim M, Wassermann J, Martin AL, Lemonnier J, Del Mastro L, Jones L, Partridge AH, Ligibel JA, Andre F, Michiels S, Luis IMVD. Impact of overweight, obesity, and post-treatment weight changes on occupational reintegration of breast cancer (BC) survivors. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.11562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11562 Background: Overweight and obesity are strongly linked to poorer BC-specific outcomes, quality of life and financial burden in cancer care. Weight loss interventions have the potential to improve such outcomes. Fewer data exist on whether excess weight and post-diagnosis weight changes impact the ability of BC survivors to return to work (RTW). Methods: CANTO (NCT01993498) is a multicenter prospective longitudinal study of 12000 patients (pts) with stage I-III BC that characterizes long-term toxicities of BC treatment. Of 5801 pts enrolled from 2012-2014 (last data lock), we identified 1874 pts who were professionally active at BC diagnosis, ≥5 years (yrs) younger than minimum legal retirement age (62 yrs) and with updated work status 2 yrs after diagnosis. Logistic regression models evaluated the impact of body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis and of weight changes over 2 yrs after diagnosis on odds of non-RTW, adjusting for age, education, income, BC treatment and recreational physical activity (PA). Results: 37% pts were overweight or obese at diagnosis (BMI ≥25 kg/m2): 34% of them gained ≥5% and 16% lost ≥5% weight after diagnosis. Rates of non-RTW at 2 yrs were significantly higher in overweight or obese vs under or normal weight pts (27% vs 18%, p≤.001; adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.04-1.80, p = .017). Overweight and obese pts who did not RTW experienced higher increments in weight (mean [95% CI]: +3.6% [+2.3, +4.9] vs +1.5% [+0.8, +2.2]) and reported more modest changes in PA (mean [95% CI]: +1.0 [-1.4, +3.5] vs +2.1 [+0.8, +3.3] MET-h/week) vs those who did RTW. Weight changes independently impacted odds of non-RTW in overweight and obese pts (p for interaction weight change*BMI ≤.001): a 5% weight gain was associated with 17% increase in adjusted odds of non-RTW (95% CI 2-35%, p = .024), whereas a loss ≥5% with 60% reduced odds of non-RTW vs weight gain (95% CI 18-82%, p = .013). Conclusions: Excess weight and weight changes are significantly associated with occupational reintegration after BC in overweight and obese pts. Randomized studies testing dedicated weight control interventions should also measure outcomes of social rehabilitation in this large subset of survivors. Clinical trial information: NCT01993498.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gwenn Menvielle
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Thomas Bovagnet
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Johanna Wassermann
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Cancer University Institute, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS AOU San Martino–IST, National Cancer Institute, Genova, Italy
| | - Lee Jones
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ferreira AR, Di Meglio A, Pistilli B, Gbenou AS, El-Mouhebb M, Everhard S, Coutant C, Cottu PH, Lerebours F, Petit T, Dalenc F, Rouanet P, Arnaud A, Martin AL, Ganz PA, Partridge AH, Delaloge S, Michiels S, Andre F, Luis IMVD. Differential impact of endocrine therapy (ET) and chemotherapy (CT) on quality of life (QoL) of 4,262 breast cancer (BC) survivors: A prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) analysis. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
512 Background: We recently witnessed a trend to de-escalate CT and escalate ET in adjuvant BC treatment (tx). However, there has been limited prior research investigating the differential impact on QoL of tx classes. We aimed to test the impact of CT and ET on QoL PROs 2 yrs after diagnosis (dx). Methods: CANTO (NCT01993498) is a multicenter prospective longitudinal study of stage I-III BC pts that characterizes long-term toxicities of BC tx. For this analysis we included 4262 pts recruited from 2012-14. QoL was extensively evaluated using the EORTC QLQ C30 and BR23. Linear regression modeling was performed, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, with use of CT and/or ET as independent variables. Analyses were stratified by menopausal status due to different tx patterns and sequelae of CT. Results: Median age at dx was 56 yrs, 63% of pts were post (PostM) and 37% premenopausal (PreM), 80% had Charlson score 0, 91% stage I-II. 26% received mastectomy, 52% CT (preM 68%, postM 44%; 86% anthracycline+taxane) and 82% ET (preM 89% tamoxifen; postM 88% aromatase inhibitor). 32% preM pts had menses 1 year after ET initiation. Overall, QoL deteriorates 2 yrs after dx. ET negatively impacts more QoL domains than CT at 2 yrs. Also, young age, smoking, income, aggressive local tx and physiological distress are often associated with low QoL. In the stratified analyses, in postM pts, mostly ET (not CT) is associated with deteriorated QoL. In contrast, in preM pts, mostly CT (not ET) is associated with deteriorated QoL. Table shows eg of associations. Conclusions: In a large prospective cohort of BC survivors, detrimental QoL 2 yrs after dx is mostly associated with ET; however, negative effects of CT persist on preM. This differential effect on QOL should be considered when choosing optimal adjuvant therapy and appropriate selection of pts for ET escalation should be a research priority. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thierry Petit
- Paul Strauss Cancer Center and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medicalo Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, CRCT, Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lambertini M, Goldrat O, Ferreira AR, Dechene J, Azim HA, Desir J, Delbaere A, t'Kint de Roodenbeke MD, de Azambuja E, Ignatiadis M, Demeestere I. Reproductive potential and performance of fertility preservation strategies in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:237-243. [PMID: 29045555 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preclinical evidence suggests a possible negative impact of deleterious BRCA mutations on female fertility. However, limited and rather conflicting clinical data are available. This study assessed the reproductive potential and performance of fertility preservation strategies in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. Patients and methods This was a retrospective analysis of two prospective studies investigating oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in newly diagnosed early breast cancer patients. In the current analysis, baseline anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and performance of cryopreservation strategies were compared between patients with or without germline deleterious BRCA mutations. Results Out of 156 patients included, 101 had known BRCA status of whom 29 (18.6%) were BRCA-mutated and 72 (46.1%) had no mutation. Median age in the entire cohort was 31 years [interquartile range (IQR) 28-33). Median AMH levels were 1.8 μg/l (IQR 1.0-2.7) and 2.6 µg/l (IQR 1.5-4.1) in the BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative cohorts, respectively (P = 0.109). Among patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation (N = 29), women in the BRCA-positive cohort tended to retrieve (6.5 versus 9; P = 0.145) and to cryopreserve (3.5 versus 6; P = 0.121) less oocytes than those in the BRCA-negative cohort. Poor response rate (i.e. retrieval of ≤4 oocytes) was 40.0% and 11.1% in the BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative cohorts, respectively (P = 0.147). Among patients who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation (N = 72), women in the BRCA-positive cohort tended to have a numerically lower number of oocytes per fragment (0.08 versus 0.14; P = 0.193) and per square millimeter (0.33 versus 0.78; P = 0.153) than those in the BRCA-negative cohort. Two BRCA-mutated patients were transplanted after chemotherapy and one delivered at term a healthy baby. No difference between BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated patients was observed in any of the above-mentioned outcomes. Conclusion A consistent trend for reduced reproductive potential and performance of cryopreservation strategies was observed in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. Independent validation of these results is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lambertini
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.,Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - O Goldrat
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A R Ferreira
- Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universiade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J Dechene
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - H A Azim
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut (AUB), Beirut, Lebanon
| | - J Desir
- Medical Genetics Department, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Delbaere
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M-D t'Kint de Roodenbeke
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Ignatiadis
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - I Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme and Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ferreira AR, Casimiro S, Ali S, Leitzel K, Lipton A, Costa L. Abstract P1-18-02: Impact of the metastatic compartment on bone biomarkers and bone outcomes in patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases (BM) in trial NCT00321464 of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-18-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Bone is the most common site of metastatic disease in pts with BC, and BM are frequently associated with skeletal related events (SRE), as, e.g., bone pain or fracture. Bone targeted agents (BTAs; denosumab or zoledronic acid) decrease the rate of SREs. Previous exploratory studies in pts with BM showed that the site of metastatic disease (bone-only disease [BO] vs. bone + extraskeletal disease [BES]) might impact both bone remodeling (reflected in the concentration of bone biomarkers) and the risk for SREs. In this large study of pts with BC and BM, we assessed bone biomarkers after the introduction of BTAs, time to first and subsequent on-study SRE/symptomatic SRE (SSE), and bone pain score variation according to metastatic compartment (BO vs. BES).
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the prospective, multicenter, randomized, registration clinical trial of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid in pts with BC and BM (NCT00321464). Study outcomes were variation of corrected urinary N-terminal telopeptide (uNTX) and bone alkaline phosphatase (bALP) at 3 months, time to first and subsequent SRE and SSE, and brief pain inventory (BPI) scores over time. Chi-squared test and t-test were used to compare biomarkers levels. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to describe time to event outcomes and differences were tested using the Cox proportional hazard model and Andersen–Gill model for multiple failure-time data. BPI scores were compared using mixed linear models.
Results: A cohort of 2046 pts was identified, 969 (47.4%) with BO and 1077 (52.6%) with BES, all treated with either denosumab or zoledronic acid. Median follow-up was 20.1 months (interquartile range 15.9-23.8; balanced between arms). Compared to pts with BO, those with BES were more frequently hormone receptor negative (20.9 vs. 15.1%) and HER2-positive (31.0 vs. 23.4%). The number of BM was similar in both groups, but those with BES had less previous SRE (31.7 vs. 42.2%). Pts with BES were more commonly treated with chemotherapy (84.0 vs. 77.5%), but less frequently with radiotherapy (59.7 vs. 65.9%) or surgery (85.0 vs. 88.1%). Absolute levels of uNTX and bALP at baseline and at 3 months, as well as normalization rates, did not differ between groups. However, when compared to those with BO and after controlling for unbalanced clinicopathological and treatment features, pts with BES presented a lower risk of first and subsequent SREs (adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58 – 0.94; p=0.013) and first SSE (adjusted-HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60 – 0.94; p=0.014). Hazard rates for SRE were higher in the first 6 months of treatment. Despite the small magnitude, pts with BO consistently showed slightly higher BPI scores (+0.2 points; p=0.014). Pts with BES had a shorter OS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.66 – 2.33).
Conclusion: Despite the consistent reduction in uNTX and bALP in pts with BC and BO or BES disease, pts with BO disease had a higher risk for SREs and higher pain score. Hazard rates for SREs were greater in the first 6 months of treatment. Strategies of treatment de-escalation of BTAs should consider the metastatic compartment and time variation of the hazard for SRE.
Citation Format: Ferreira AR, Casimiro S, Ali S, Leitzel K, Lipton A, Costa L. Impact of the metastatic compartment on bone biomarkers and bone outcomes in patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases (BM) in trial NCT00321464 of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AR Ferreira
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - S Casimiro
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - S Ali
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - K Leitzel
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - A Lipton
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| | - L Costa
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mansinho A, Ferreira AR, Casimiro S, Alho I, Vendrell I, Costa AL, Sousa R, Abreu C, Pulido C, Macedo D, Pacheco TR, Correia L, Costa L. Levels of Circulating Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) and Prognosis in Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20030695. [PMID: 30736285 PMCID: PMC6387099 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathway plays a key role in tumorigenesis and is recognized as a potential therapeutic target. In this study, the authors aimed to assess the impact of serum FGF23 levels in the prognosis of patients with cancer and bone metastases from solid tumors. A cohort of 112 patients with cancer and metastatic bone disease were treated with bone-targeted agents (BTA). Serum baseline FGF23 was quantified by ELISA and dichotomized in FGF23high and FGF23low groups. Additionally, the association between FGF23 and overall survival (OS) and time to skeletal-related events (TTSRE) was investigated. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, except for the median urinary N-terminal telopeptide (uNTX) level. After a median follow-up of 26.0 months, a median OS of 34.4 and 12.2 months was found in the FGF23low and FGF23high groups, respectively (multivariate HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07–0.44, p = 0.001; univariate HR 0.27, p = 0.001). Additionally, TTSRE was significantly longer for patients with FGF23low (13.0 vs. 2.0 months, p = 0.04). Overall, this study found that patients with FGF23low at baseline had longer OS and TTSRE. Further studies are warranted to define its role as a prognostic biomarker and in the use of drugs targeting the FGF axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Mansinho
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Luís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Luís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Sandra Casimiro
- Luís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Irina Alho
- Luís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Inês Vendrell
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Ana Lúcia Costa
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Rita Sousa
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Catarina Abreu
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | | | - Daniela Macedo
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Teresa R Pacheco
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Luís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Lurdes Correia
- Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Luís Costa
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Luís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Loureiro H, Carrasquinha E, Alho I, Ferreira AR, Costa L, Carvalho AM, Vinga S. Modelling cancer outcomes of bone metastatic patients: combining survival data with N-Telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) dynamics through joint models. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:13. [PMID: 30654776 PMCID: PMC6337820 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0728-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Joint models (JM) have emerged as a promising statistical framework to concurrently analyse survival data and multiple longitudinal responses. This is particularly relevant in clinical studies where the goal is to estimate the association between time-to-event data and the biomarkers evolution. In the context of oncological data, JM can indeed provide interesting prognostic markers for the event under study and thus support clinical decisions and treatment choices. However, several problems arise when dealing with this type of data, such as the high-dimensionality of the covariates space, the lack of knowledge about the function structure of the time series and the presence of missing data, facts that may hamper the accurate estimation of the JM. Methods We propose to apply JM for the analysis of bone metastatic patients and infer the association of their survival with several covariates, in particular the N-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (NTX) dynamics. This biomarker has been identified as a relevant prognostic factor in patients with metastatic cancer, but only using static information in some specific time points. Results We extended this analysis using the full NTX time series for a larger cohort of patients with bone metastasis, and compared the results obtained by the JM and the extended Cox regression model. Imputation based on fuzzy clustering was used to deal with missing values and several functions for NTX evolution were compared, such as rational, exponential and cubic splines. Conclusions The JM obtained confirm the association between NTX values and patients’ response, attesting the importance of this time series, and additionally provide a deep understanding of the key survival covariates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Loureiro
- INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol, 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal.,IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal
| | - Eunice Carrasquinha
- INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol, 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal.,IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal
| | - Irina Alho
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Av. Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Av. Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Av. Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal
| | - Alexandra M Carvalho
- Instituto de Telecomunicações, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal.,Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal
| | - Susana Vinga
- INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol, 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal. .,IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Metzger-Filho O, Ferreira AR, Jeselsohn R, Barry WT, Dillon DA, Brock JE, Vaz-Luis I, Hughes ME, Winer EP, Lin NU. Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Prognosis and the Importance of Histologic Grade. Oncologist 2018; 24:e441-e449. [PMID: 30518616 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L) in clinical practice is often associated with uncertainty related to its prognosis and response to systemic therapies. With the increasing recognition of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) as a distinct disease subtype, questions surrounding IDC-L become even more relevant. In this study, we took advantage of a detailed clinical database to compare IDC-L and ILC regarding clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics, prognostic power of histologic grade, and survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 811 patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer with IDC-L or ILC. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare baseline clinicopathologic characteristics and treatments. Survival rates were subsequently analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Patients with ILC had more commonly multifocal disease, low to intermediate histologic grade, and HER2-negative disease. Histologic grade was prognostic for patients with IDC-L but had no significant discriminatory power in patients with ILC. Among postmenopausal women, those with IDC-L had significantly better outcomes when compared with those with ILC: disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.95). Finally, postmenopausal women treated with an aromatase inhibitor had more favorable DFS and OS than those treated with tamoxifen only (OS adjusted HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87), which was similar for both histologic types (p = .212). CONCLUSION IDC-L tumors have a better prognosis than ILC tumors, particularly among postmenopausal women. Histologic grade is an important prognostic factor in IDC-L but not in ILC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study compared mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (IDC-L) with invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) to assess the overall prognosis, the prognostic role of histologic grade, and response to systemic therapy. It was found that patients with IDC-L tumors have a better prognosis than ILC, particularly among postmenopausal women, which may impact follow-up strategies. Moreover, although histologic grade failed to stratify the risk of ILC, it showed an important prognostic power in IDC-L, thus highlighting its clinical utility to guide treatment decisions of IDC-L. Finally, the disease-free survival advantage of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in ILC was consistent in IDC-L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto Metzger-Filho
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rinath Jeselsohn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah A Dillon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jane E Brock
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vendrell I, Ferreira AR, Abrunhosa-Branquinho AN, Semedo PM, Pulido CF, Jorge M, de Pina MF, Pinto C, Costa L. Chemoradiotherapy completion and neutropenia risk in HIV patients with cervical cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e11592. [PMID: 30045290 PMCID: PMC6078728 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000011592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining diseases and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is thought to relate with increased acute toxicity of chemoradiotherapy (CRT).We investigated the effect of HIV status in the incidence of neutropenia associated with cisplatin-based CRT for CC and its impact in treatment completion.This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Data collection was performed for all the consecutive stage Ib-IV CC women treated with cisplatin-based CRT from 2012 to 2016, and with known HIV status.Sixty-one patients were included, 6 were HIV+. HIV+ patients had a higher risk of neutropenia at any cycle during cisplatin CRT [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02-52.3; P = .05]. Despite the absolute differences, mean neutrophil count was nonsignificantly lower in HIV+ women, both at baseline [4455/μL (interquartile range, IQR: 1830-6689) vs 6340 (IQR: 1720-18,970) for HIV-, P = .98] and at the end of treatment [1752/μL (IQR: 1100-2930) vs 3147/μL (IQR: 920-18,390) in HIV-; P = .06]. Moreover, when considering the effect of time, CRT seems to induce a consistent drop of neutrophils in both groups (P = .229). No febrile neutropenia events occurred.In HIV+ women, there were more CT cycle delays (P = .013), patients were more prone to use granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; HIV+ 40.0% vs HIV- 4.0%; P = .04) and less likely to complete at least 5 cycles of cisplatin (P = .02). All patients received adequate dose of pelvic RT, regardless of HIV status.HIV+ patients have a significantly increased risk of neutropenia during CRT treatment for CC and are less likely to complete chemotherapy with cisplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Vendrell
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte
| | - Arlindo R. Ferreira
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte
- Luis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa
| | | | | | | | - Marília Jorge
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte
| | | | | | - Luís Costa
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte
- Luis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Barroso-Sousa R, Guo H, Barry WT, Ferreira AR, Rees R, Winer EP, Wagle N, Tolaney SM. A phase I study of palbociclib (PALBO) plus everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) in hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i): safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hao Guo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Arlindo R. Ferreira
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Maurer C, Ferreira AR, Martel S, Lambertini M, Pondé N, Aftimos P, de Azambuja E, Piccart M. Endocrine therapy and palbociclib within a compassionate use program in heavily pretreated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Breast 2018; 39:14-18. [PMID: 29474991 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This is a single center retrospective analysis of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing after ≥ 4 treatment lines treated with palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy within a compassionate use program. Thirty-four patients were included between 10/2015 and 02/2017, the majority (82.4%) being previously treated with mTOR inhibitors. Disease control rate was 52.9% and 24.4% at week 12 and 24. Overall progression-free survival was 3.1 months with no difference between mTOR inhibitor-pretreated (3.5 months) and -naïve patients (2.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.83). Toxicity profile in this population was comparable to that seen in previous trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Maurer
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium; Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Samuel Martel
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium; Département d'hémato-oncologie, CISSS Montérégie-centre/Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne, centre affilié de l'Université de Sherbrooke, Greenfield Park, Qc, Canada
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium; Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Noam Pondé
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Aftimos
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Martel S, Poletto E, Ferreira AR, Lambertini M, Sottotetti F, Bertolini I, Montemurro F, Bernardo A, Risi E, Zanardi E, Ziliani S, Mura S, Dellepiane C, Del Mastro L, Minisini AM, Puglisi F. Impact of body mass index on the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast 2018; 37:142-147. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
37
|
Ferreira AR, Metzger-Filho O, Sarmento RMB, Bines J. Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIB/III Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (CAP Regimen): A Single Arm, Single Center Phase II Study (GBECAM 2008/02). Front Oncol 2018; 7:329. [PMID: 29416986 PMCID: PMC5787778 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The DNA damaging platinum salts have been explored in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on preclinical, and, more recently, clinical evidence of specific susceptibility of TNBC to these agents. Despite the increased toxicity, treatment intensification with polychemotherapy improves response and might be of interest in patients presenting with large primaries. In this trial, we aimed at exploring the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of cisplatin to standard anthracycline–cyclophosphamide backbone in patients with stage IIB/III TNBC. Patients and methods This is a single arm, single center, non-randomized, phase II trial of stage IIB/III TNBC. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) in combination with doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) every 21 days and for a total of six cycles (CAP). After surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days was further provided for four cycles. Primary outcome was pathological complete response in the breast and axilla (pCR; ypT0ypN0). Secondary outcomes were safety, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Eight (19.5%) out of 41 patients reached a pCR and 35 (85.4%) had a clinical complete or partial response. After a median follow-up of 47.4 months (interquartile range 30.9–61.9), the proportion of patients free of recurrence or death at 3 years was of 51.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.6–66.5%], while the proportion of patients alive at 3 years was of 55.5% (95% CI 37.8–70.1%). Patients with a pCR rate or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer showed a numerical but statistically non-significant trend for improved DFS and OS. The majority of patients received six cycles of CAP (82.9%). The three most common grade ≥3 adverse events were nausea (16.3%), vomiting (14.0%), and neutropenia (9.3%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (7.0%). Conclusion Cisplatin in association with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide was associated with a pCR rate of 19.5% in a cohort of patients with predominantly stage III tumors. The tolerability profile of this combination poses clinical challenges to its general use in clinical practice. Unique Identifier Number GBECAM 2008/02. NCT Identifier Number NCT03304756.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R Ferreira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Otto Metzger-Filho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Roberta M B Sarmento
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - José Bines
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Martel S, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Maurer C, Ponde NF, Ferreira AR, Viglietti G, Del Mastro L, Prady C, de Azambuja E, Lambertini M. Risk of adverse events with the addition of targeted agents to endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 62:123-132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
39
|
Ferreira AR, Palha A, Correia L, Filipe P, Rodrigues V, Miranda A, André R, Fernandes J, Gouveia J, Passos-Coelho JL, Moreira A, Brito M, Ribeiro J, Metzger-Filho O, Lin NU, Costa L, Vaz-Luis I. Treatment adoption and relative effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors compared to tamoxifen in early breast cancer: A multi-institutional observational study. Breast 2017; 37:107-113. [PMID: 29131988 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2005, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been the adjuvant treatment of choice for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer (BC). In this study we characterize the adoption of AIs in Portugal, variables associated with treatment administration, and compare its effectiveness (either in monotherapy or sequential therapy) to tamoxifen monotherapy (TAM). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study that included postmenopausal women with stage I-III hormone receptor (HR) positive BC diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 and treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in four participating institutions. RESULTS Of the 1283 eligible patients, 527 (41%) received an AI (16% as monotherapy, 25% as sequential therapy) and 756 (59%) TAM. Patients treated with AI had less differentiated tumors, with higher TNM stage, and were more frequently HER2-positive. Use of AI also differed by center (use range from 33% to 75%, p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 6.3 years and controlling for clinicopathological and treatment characteristics, treatment with AI had a better overall survival (OS) when compared with TAM (adjusted-HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81). CONCLUSION AIs were successfully introduced as adjuvant treatment for HR-positive BC in Portuguese hospitals. Its use was influenced by tumor and patient characteristics, but also center of care. In this large cohort, AI use was associated with an OS benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R Ferreira
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Palha
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lurdes Correia
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Filipe
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Rodrigues
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Miranda
- Registo Oncológico Regional do Sul, Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rosário André
- Registo Oncológico Regional do Sul, Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Fernandes
- Hospitais CUF Lisboa, R. Mário Botas, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joaquim Gouveia
- Hospitais CUF Lisboa, R. Mário Botas, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - António Moreira
- Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Margarida Brito
- Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, R. Prof. Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joana Ribeiro
- Fundação Champalimaud, Av. Brasília, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Luís Costa
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Vaz-Luis
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Unit INSERM 981, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Costa L, Ferreira AR. Adjuvant zoledronic acid to treat breast cancer: not for all. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1437-1439. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30695-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
41
|
Lambertini M, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Maurer C, Pondé NF, Ferreira AR, Viglietti G, Del Mastro L, Prady C, de Azambuja E, Martel S. Adverse Events (AE) of Targeted Agents Added to Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breast 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(17)30685-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
42
|
Lambertini M, Ferreira AR, Di Meglio A, Poggio F, Puglisi F, Sottotetti F, Montemurro F, Poletto E, Bernardo A, Risi E, Dellepiane C, Sini V, Minuti G, Grasso D, Fancelli S, Del Mastro L. Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IV or Recurrent Disease Undergoing First-line Trastuzumab-based Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17:601-610.e2. [PMID: 28479052 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to compare the patterns of care and clinical outcomes of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with de novo or recurrent disease who underwent first-line trastuzumab-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with HER2-positive MBC who received first-line trastuzumab-based therapy. Analyses on treatment response and effectiveness were conducted according to type of metastatic presentation (ie, de novo vs. recurrent disease). Exploratory analyses were used to evaluate whether the use of surgery of the primary tumor in the de novo cohort influenced patients' survival. RESULTS From January 2000 to December 2013, 416 patients were included in the study, 113 (27.2%) presented with de novo MBC and 303 (72.8%) with recurrent disease. Compared with patients in the recurrence cohort, those in the de novo cohort had worse baseline characteristics, received more aggressive first-line treatments, and showed better survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.97; P = .035) and for overall survival (OS) of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.30-0.95; P = .034). In the de novo cohort, the 54 patients (47.8%) who underwent surgery of the primary tumor had significantly better PFS (adjusted HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.72; P = .001) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93; P = .029) than those who did not undergo surgery. CONCLUSION Patients with de novo HER2-positive MBC showed significantly better survival outcomes than those with recurrent disease. In this population, surgery of the primary breast tumor was associated with better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Medicine, BrEAST Data Center, Institut Jules Bordet, and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Montemurro
- Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy
| | - Elena Poletto
- Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Bernardo
- Medical Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Chiara Dellepiane
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Valentina Sini
- Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, and Oncology Unit ASL Roma 1 Santo Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Minuti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Donatella Grasso
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Fancelli
- UO Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pulido C, Vendrell I, Ferreira AR, Casimiro S, Mansinho A, Alho I, Costa L. Bone metastasis risk factors in breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2017; 11:715. [PMID: 28194227 PMCID: PMC5295847 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone is the single most frequent site for bone metastasis in breast cancer patients. Patients with bone-only metastasis have a fairly good prognosis when compared with patients with visceral disease. Nevertheless, cancer-induced bone disease carries an important risk of developing skeletal related events that impact quality of life (QoL). It is therefore particularly important to stratify patients according to their risk of developing bone metastasis. In this context, several risk factors have been studied, including demographic, clinicopathological, genetic, and metabolic factors. Most of them show conflicting or non-definitive associations and are not validated for clinical use. Nonetheless, tumour intrinsic subtype is widely accepted as a major risk factor for bone metastasis development and luminal breast cancer carries an increased risk for bone disease. Other factors such as gene signatures, expression of specific cytokines (such as bone sialoprotein and bone morphogenetic protein 7) or components of the extracellular matrix (like bone crosslinked C-telopeptide) might also influence the development of bone metastasis. Knowledge of risk factors related with bone disease is of paramount importance as it might be a prediction tool for triggering the use of targeted agents and allow for better patient selection for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Pulido
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal; These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Inês Vendrell
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal; These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal; Luis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Sandra Casimiro
- Luis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - André Mansinho
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Irina Alho
- Luis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal; Luis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Casimiro S, Ferreira AR, Mansinho A, Alho I, Costa L. Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Metastasis: Which Targets Came from the Bench to the Bedside? Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:E1415. [PMID: 27618899 PMCID: PMC5037694 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 08/06/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone metastases ultimately result from a complex interaction between cancer cells and bone microenvironment. However, prior to the colonization of the bone, cancer cells must succeed through a series of steps that will allow them to detach from the primary tumor, enter into circulation, recognize and adhere to specific endothelium, and overcome dormancy. We now know that as important as the metastatic cascade, tumor cells prime the secondary organ microenvironment prior to their arrival, reflecting the existence of specific metastasis-initiating cells in the primary tumor and circulating osteotropic factors. The deep comprehension of the molecular mechanisms of bone metastases may allow the future development of specific anti-tumoral therapies, but so far the approved and effective therapies for bone metastatic disease are mostly based in bone-targeted agents, like bisphosphonates, denosumab and, for prostate cancer, radium-223. Bisphosphonates and denosumab have proven to be effective in blocking bone resorption and decreasing morbidity; furthermore, in the adjuvant setting, these agents can decrease bone relapse after breast cancer surgery in postmenopausal women. In this review, we will present and discuss some examples of applied knowledge from the bench to the bed side in the field of bone metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Casimiro
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - André Mansinho
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Irina Alho
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Luis Costa
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
- Oncology Division, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mansinho A, R Ferreira A, Costa L. Hypocalcemia in patients with metastatic bone disease treated with denosumab. Ann Joint 2016. [DOI: 10.21037/aoj.2016.08.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
46
|
Ferreira AR, Alho I, Shan N, Matias M, Faria M, Casimiro S, Leitzel K, Ali S, Lipton A, Costa L. N-Telopeptide of Type I Collagen Long-Term Dynamics in Breast Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases: Clinical Outcomes and Influence of Extraskeletal Metastases. Oncologist 2016; 21:1418-1426. [PMID: 27534575 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Markers of bone metabolism, such as N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), have been demonstrated to be prognostic in previous trials of breast cancer (BC) patients with bone metastases (BMs). In the present study, we tested the survival effect of the NTX response to zoledronic acid (ZA) at 3 and 12 months in a contemporaneous cohort of BC patients with BMs and evaluated the influence of extraskeletal metastatic disease on NTX variation. PATIENTS AND METHODS The present study was a prospective cohort study of consecutive BC patients diagnosed and treated at a single center. Patients presenting with de novo radiological evidence of BMs who started monthly intravenous ZA were included. Urinary NTX was measured at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after ZA introduction. RESULTS Overall, 71 patients were enrolled, 32 with BMs and 39 with BMs plus extraskeletal metastases. The proportion of patients with elevated NTX at baseline and 3 and 12 months was 49.3%, 26.6%, and 34.2%, respectively. The variables associated with survival included age at diagnosis, tumor estrogen receptor status, and NTX at 3 and 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that, in addition to age at diagnosis, only the 3-month NTX level was significantly associated with survival. Patients with BMs plus extraskeletal metastases had an erratic NTX variation pattern, unrelated to survival. CONCLUSION In the present contemporaneous cohort of BC patients with BMs, the NTX response at 3 months was strongly associated with survival. Furthermore, an early response to ZA was strongly associated with long-term NTX control. Finally, patients with BMs plus extraskeletal metastases had an erratic NTX variation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The present study showed that when accommodating recent therapy innovations and longer patient survival, the N-telopeptide (NTX) variation at 3 months is strongly associated with survival. In this setting, in addition to a few other clinicopathological features, NTX is a powerful prognostic marker. Moreover, early NTX correction associates with persistently normal NTX. This might identify a subgroup of patients with a good prognosis who are eligible for premature zoledronic acid (ZA) de-escalation. Finally, patients with bone plus extraskeletal metastases showed an erratic variation of NTX, raising concerns that a single ZA regimen might not fit all patients. Future trials should test its effect according to the presence of extraskeletal involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R Ferreira
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Irina Alho
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ning Shan
- Thar Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Sandra Casimiro
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Kim Leitzel
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suhail Ali
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Allan Lipton
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luís Costa
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
R Ferreira A, Palha A, Correia L, Filipe P, Rodrigues V, Costa L, Miranda A, André R, Fernandes J, Gouveia J, Passos-Coelho JL, Moreira A, Brito M, Ribeiro J, Metzger-Filho O, U Lin N, Vaz-Luís I. Variation in type of adjuvant chemotherapy received among patients with stage I breast cancer: A multi-institutional Portuguese cohort study. Breast 2016; 29:68-73. [PMID: 27468923 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Revised: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A contemporary US study showed an increase in the use of chemotherapy in the last decade for some patients with stage-I breast cancer; with a rise in more intensive regimens, and declining use of anthracyclines. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty on the absolute benefit of chemotherapy for these patients and the optimal regimen. In this study we compare those findings with the patterns of care among a Portuguese cohort of stage-I breast cancers. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of patients with stage-I breast cancer diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 at four Portuguese institutions. The use and type of chemotherapy was evaluated. RESULTS Among patients with stage I-III breast cancer 39.4% (n = 682) had stage I disease. Of the 595 eligible patients, 22.4% were treated with chemotherapy, 33.9% aged <55 years vs. 12.7% aged >65 years (p < 0.001). Thirteen percent of patients with hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- tumors, 52.7% of patients with HER2+ and 66.0% of patients with HR-/HER2- received chemotherapy (p < 0.001). In addition, we found inter-institutional variability, with the use of chemotherapy ranging from 0.0% to 43.4% (p < 0.001). Eighty-five percent of patients treated with chemotherapy received less-intensive regimens with anthracycline-based regimens, such as doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, being the most frequently used, while docetaxel and cyclophosphamide was only used in 1.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Overall, almost one-quarter of patients received chemotherapy with institutional variability. When treated, mostly less-intensive associations including anthracyclines were used, which contrasts with contemporary US practice. This study highlights the need for health-services research to understand local practices and tailor quality improvement interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R Ferreira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Ana Palha
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lurdes Correia
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Filipe
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Rodrigues
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Miranda
- Registo Oncológico Regional do Sul, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rosário André
- Registo Oncológico Regional do Sul, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - António Moreira
- Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Margarida Brito
- Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lambertini M, Ferreira AR, Del Mastro L, Danesi R, Pronzato P. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2015; 15:1799-817. [PMID: 26488491 DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1101063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia are the most common and most severe bone marrow toxicities of chemotherapy. Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), both daily (filgrastim and biosimilars, and lenograstim) and long-acting (pegfilgrastim and lipegfilgrastim) formulations, are currently available to counteract the negative consequences of these side effects. AREAS COVERED The purpose of this article is to review the physiopathology of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and its consequences, and the current evidence regarding the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim as a strategy to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors. EXPERT OPINION Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and its complications are still a major health-care concern, and the inappropriate employment of G-CSFs in clinical practice can partially explain its burden. Pegfilgrastim has pharmacological advantages over daily G-CSFs that makes it easily administrable, thus reducing the chance of incorrect delivery. The once-per-cycle administration might explain the findings derived from observational studies suggesting a possible superior efficacy of pegfilgrastim over daily G-CSFs. For patients at higher risk of failure with daily G-CSF prophylaxis (e.g. risk of non-compliance, difficulties on performing regular hemograms, high risk of developing febrile neutropenia), pegfilgrastim might be the most appropriate option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- a Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2 , IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST , 16132 Genoa , Italy
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- b Department of Medical Oncology , Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon , 1600 Lisbon , Portugal
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- c Department of Medical Oncology , U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST , 16132 Genoa , Italy
| | - Romano Danesi
- d Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Pisa , 56126 Pisa , Italy
| | - Paolo Pronzato
- a Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2 , IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST , 16132 Genoa , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ferreira AR, Aguiar Filho LFC, Sousa RV, Sartori R, Franco MM. Characterization of allele-specific expression of the X-linked gene MAO-A in trophectoderm cells of bovine embryos produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Genet Mol Res 2015; 14:12128-36. [PMID: 26505360 DOI: 10.4238/2015.october.5.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) may affect epigenetic mechanisms and alter the expression of genes related to embryo development and X chromosome inactivation (XCI). We characterized allele-specific expression of the X-linked gene monoamine oxidase type A (MAO-A) in the trophectoderm (TF) of embryos produced by SCNT. Total RNA was isolated from individual biopsies (N = 25), and the allele-specific expression assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Both paternal and maternal alleles were expressed in the trophectoderm. However, a higher frequency of the mono-allelic expression of a specific allele was observed (N = 17; 68%), with the remaining samples showing the presence of mRNA from both alleles (N = 8; 32%). Considering that MAO-A is subject to XCI in bovine, our results suggest that SCNT may influence XCI because neither an imprinted (mono-allelic expression in all samples) nor a random (presence of mRNA from both alleles in all samples) pattern of XCI was observed in TF. Due to the importance of XCI in mammalian embryo development and its sensitivity to in vitro conditions, X-linked genes subject to XCI are candidates for use in the development of embryo quality molecular markers for assisted reproduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Ferreira
- Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| | - L F C Aguiar Filho
- Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| | - R V Sousa
- Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| | - R Sartori
- Departmento de Reprodução Animal e Radiologia Veterinária, Escola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
| | - M M Franco
- Laboratório de Reprodução Animal, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lambertini M, Ferreira AR, Poggio F, Puglisi F, Bernardo A, Montemurro F, Poletto E, Pozzi E, Rossi V, Risi E, Lai A, Zanardi E, Sini V, Ziliani S, Minuti G, Mura S, Grasso D, Fontana A, Del Mastro L. Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Trastuzumab-Based Therapy in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Relapsing After (Neo)Adjuvant Trastuzumab: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Oncologist 2015; 20:880-9. [PMID: 26099741 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the patterns of care and clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy after previous (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 416 consecutive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who had received first-line trastuzumab-based therapy were identified at 14 Italian centers. A total of 113 patients had presented with de novo stage IV disease and were analyzed separately. Dichotomous clinical outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and time-to-event outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS In the 202 trastuzumab-naïve patients and 101 patients with previous trastuzumab exposure, we observed the following outcomes, respectively: overall response rate, 69.9% versus 61.3% (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.62; p = .131), clinical benefit rate, 79.1% versus 72.5% (adjusted OR, 0.73; p = .370), median progression-free survival (PFS), 16.1 months versus 12.0 months (adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 1.33; p = .045), and median overall survival (OS), 52.2 months versus 48.2 months (adjusted HR, 1.18; p = .404). Patients with a trastuzumab-free interval (TFI) <6 months, visceral involvement, and hormone receptor-negative disease showed a worse OS compared with patients with a TFI of ≥6 months (29.5 vs. 48.3 months; p = .331), nonvisceral involvement (48.0 vs. 60.3 months; p = .270), and hormone receptor-positive disease (39.8 vs. 58.6 months; p = .003), respectively. CONCLUSION Despite the inferior median PFS, trastuzumab-based therapy was an effective first-line treatment for patients relapsing after (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Previous trastuzumab exposure and the respective TFI, type of first site of disease relapse, and hormone receptor status should be considered in the choice of the best first-line treatment option for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonio Bernardo
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Filippo Montemurro
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Poletto
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Emma Pozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Valentina Rossi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonella Lai
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Elisa Zanardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Valentina Sini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Serena Ziliani
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Gabriele Minuti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Mura
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Donatella Grasso
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontana
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria and Instituto de Medicina Molecular of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Oncology, AOU S.M. Misericordia, University Hospital, Udine, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; Investigative Clinical Oncology (INCO), Fondazione del Piemonte per L'Oncologia, Candiolo Cancer Center (IRCCS), Candiolo, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Saluzzo, Saluzzo, Italy; Department of Radiology, Oncology and Human Pathology, Oncology Unit B, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy; Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Toscano, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy; Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata, Sassari, Italy; Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy; U.O. Oncologia 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|