Is D-dimer a Reliable Serum Marker for Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Diagnostic value of ratio of blood inflammation to coagulation markers in periprosthetic joint infection

Introduction

Assess the feasibility of utilizing the ratio of blood inflammation to coagulation markers as a potential periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnostic tool.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted, involving 133 PJI and 93 aseptic loosening patients. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), platelet count, mean platelet volume, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and ratios of CRP to fibrinogen, ESR to fibrinogen, platelet count and mean platelet volume ratio (PC/MPV), and D-dimer were compared. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Youden's index were employed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of these biomarkers.

Results

PJI patients had significantly higher levels of CRP, ESR, PC/MPV ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, CRP/(PC/MPV) ratio (CPR), CRP/D-dimer, CRP/fibrinogen (CFR), ESR/(PC/MPV) ratio, ESR/D-dimer, and ESR/fibrinogen. Area under the curve (AUC) values for fibrinogen, CRP, and ESR in diagnosing PJI were comparable. AUC values for CPR and CFR were akin to those of ESR. AUC values for combined CRP and CPR, combined CRP and fibrinogen, combined CRP and CFR, and combined ESR and fibrinogen in diagnosing PJI were akin to that of combined CRP and ESR.

Conclusions

Fibrinogen, CPR, CFR, combined CRP and CPR, combined CRP and fibrinogen, combined CRP and CFR, and combined ESR and fibrinogen could be considered as new adjunct markers for diagnosing PJI.

Serum and Synovial Markers in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip, Knee, and Shoulder: An Algorithmic Approach

➤ No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).➤ Physicians rely on a combination of serological tests, synovial markers, and clinical findings plus clinical judgment to help to guide preoperative decision-making.➤ Several organizations have proposed criteria for the diagnosis of hip or knee PJI on which we now rely.➤ Given that shoulder arthroplasty has only recently become popular, it is possible that a shoulder-specific definition of PJI will be introduced in the coming years.➤ Although a number of serum and synovial markers have demonstrated high accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI of the hip and knee, further research is needed in order to identify markers that may be more suitable for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI and for the potential development and identification of specific serological tests as screening tools for PJI.

Diagnostic Evaluation of Prosthetic Joint Infections of the Shoulder: What Does the Literature Say?

The total number of patients with a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is increasing, and the number of patients experiencing a (TSA) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) also will increase. It is important that physicians know how to identify signs of infection, know the common pathogens, and know how to work up a shoulder PJI. This publication reviewed the current literature about presenting signs and symptoms, common shoulder pathogens and how they differ from total knee and hip pathogens, and what images, tests, and procedures can aid in identification of infection.

Preventing and Treating Infection in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty is relatively uncommon though associated with severe long-term morbidity when encountered. The purpose of the review is to summarize the recent literature regarding the definition, clinical evaluation, prevention, and management of prosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

The landmark report generated at the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection has provided a framework for diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder specific literature with validated interventions to reduce prosthetic joint infection is limited; however existing literature from retrospective studies and from total hip and knee arthroplasty allows us to make relative guidelines. One and two-stage revisions seem to demonstrate similar outcomes; however, no controlled comparative studies exist limiting the ability to make definitive recommendations between the two options. We report on recent literature regarding the current diagnostic, preventative, and treatment options for periprosthetic infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and further high-level shoulder specific studies are needed to answer questions generated from this review.

The role of serum D-Dimer for the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection

INTRODUCTION

D-Dimer was recently identified as an additional biomarker in the diagnosis of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, there is only one study in literature dealing with the role of D-Dimer in the diagnosis of shoulder PJI. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to validate the sensitivity and specificity of D-Dimer in detecting shoulder PJI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients, who underwent septic or aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty in our institution between November 2018 und March 2021, were analyzed. Our cohort consisted of 30 patients, of that 14 (47%) had a shoulder PJI according the last proposed criteria of the International Consensus Meeting. The diagnostic validity of serum D-Dimer regarding the detection of PJI was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean D-Dimer level was significantly higher for the patients with shoulder PJI compared to patients with aseptic failure (1.44 ± 1 mg/l vs. 0.76 ± 0.6 mg/l, p = 0.025). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated pathogens, in 9/14 patients (64%), followed by Cutibacterium acnes in 5/14 patients (36%). According to the ROC analysis, a serum D-Dimer threshold of 0.75 mg/l had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 56% for detection of a shoulder PJI. The area under curve was 0.74. A serum C-reactive protein (CRP) cutoff of 10 mg/l showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 88%. When both serum D-Dimer and CRP above the thresholds of 0.75 mg/l and 10 mg/l, respectively, were used to identify a PJI the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum D-Dimer showed a good sensitivity but a poor specificity for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI. Combination D-Dimer and CRP led to improvement of the specificity, however, at the cost of sensitivity. Thus, combination of both methods may be used as a confirmatory test in the diagnosis of shoulder PJI but not to rule out infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic level II.

Diagnostic value of plasma D-dimer and serum lipoprotein phospholipase A2 in patients with cerebral small vessel disease and their association with severity of the disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic value of plasma D-dimer (DD) and serum lipoprotein phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and their association with severity of the disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 84 patients with CSVD treated in Shangqiu First People's Hospital from February 2020 to November 2021 were included in the study group, and 75 healthy individuals were assigned into the control group. The DD and Lp-PLA2 levels in the two groups were compared, and the diagnostic value of the two in CSVD was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients were assigned to a mild group or a severe group based on Fazekas scale scores. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of the DD and Lp-PLA2 levels, and the association of the two with the severity of CSVD was determined through ROC curves. With the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) scale, the patients were assigned to a cognitive impairment group or a non-cognitive impairment group. Then the two groups were compared in terms of the DD and Lp-PLA2 levels, and the association of the two with the cognitive function of CSVD patients was also determined by ROC curves.

RESULTS

The research group showed higher DD and Lp-PLA2 levels than the control group; the severe group showed higher DD and Lp-PLA2 levels than the mild group; the cognitive impairment group showed higher DD and Lp-PLA2 levels than the non-cognitive impairment group (all P < 0.001). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of DD and Lp-PLA2 in CSVD diagnosis were 0.902 and 0.907, respectively; the AUCs of DD and Lp-PLA2 in CSVD severity determination were 0.747 and 0.704, respectively; the AUCs of DD and Lp-PLA2 in cognitive impairment diagnosis were 0.736 and 0.725, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Plasma DD and Lp-PLA2 possess good diagnostic value in patients with CSVD, and also has certain clinical value in diagnosing patients' severity and cognitive impairment.