What Are Orthopaedic Patients' and Clinical Team Members' Perspectives Regarding Whether and How to Address Mental Health in the Orthopaedic Care Setting? A Qualitative Investigation of Patients With Neck or Back Pain

Delivery of Hand Care to Patients With High Anxiety Burden

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients presenting with Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety scores at >95th percentile of the US population undergo elective hand surgery at rates different from patients with less anxiety. Secondarily, we aimed to assess surgeon notation of these patients' emotional states and incidences of postoperative complications.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed data from new adult patients presenting for hand care between January 2019 and December 2020. Patients with initial PROMIS anxiety scores ≥70 were identified as the high anxiety burden (HAB) group. For each patient with HAB presenting with carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and distal radius fractures (n = 45), three controls were matched (n = 135). After matching, bivariate statistical analysis compared outcome variables of interest between patient groups. Sentiment analysis was used to explore if patient anxiety was realized and considered in surgical decision making.

RESULTS

After matching, patients with HAB averaged baseline PROMIS scores in every assessed domain that were ≥1 SD worse than unaffected patients. Patients with HAB and control patients were offered surgery at a comparable rate (58% vs 47%). Among those offered surgery, patients with HAB were less likely to undergo surgery (73% vs 92%). Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the patients with HAB (32% vs 8%). Sentiment analysis of office notes revealed that the patients with HAB had their emotional state explicitly noted more often (40% vs 24%), but the majority of patients with HAB did not have this addressed in records.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HAB both underwent surgery offered less frequently and when undergoing surgery, experienced more complications. Surgeons are likely to miss opportunities to positively influence extreme patient anxiety as most patients with HAB were treated without mention of their emotional state. Future investigations should explore whether preoperative anxiety alleviation could diminish these disparities.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Symptom Prevalence III.

Increased prevalence of lower extremity soft tissue injuries and surgeries in patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa

PURPOSE

An abundance of literature exists linking eating disorders and fracture risk. However, no studies, to our knowledge, have investigated the impact of eating disorders on lower extremity soft tissue injury or surgery risk. The purpose of this study was to determine if anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are associated with prevalence of lower extremity soft tissue injuries and surgeries.

METHODS

Patients with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa over 2010-2020 were identified through the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes in the PearlDiver Claims Database. Patients were matched by age, gender, comorbidities, record dates, and region to control groups without anorexia or bulimia. Soft tissue injuries were identified through ICD codes, and surgeries were identified through Current Procedural Terminology codes. Differences in relative prevalence were analyzed using chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with anorexia had a significantly increased prevalence of meniscus tears (RR = 1.57, CI 1.22-2.03, p = 0.001) or deltoid ligament sprains (RR = 1.83, CI 1.10-3.03, p = 0.025), and patients with bulimia had a significantly increased prevalence of meniscus tears (RR = 1.98, CI 1.56-2.51, p < 0.001), medial collateral ligament sprains (RR = 3.07, CI 1.72-5.48, p < 0.001), any cruciate ligament tears (RR = 2.14, CI 1.29-3.53, p = 0.004), unspecified ankle sprains (RR = 1.56, CI 1.22-1.99, p < 0.001), or any ankle ligament sprains (RR = 1.27, CI 1.07-1.52, p = 0.008). Patients with anorexia had a significantly increased prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (RR = 2.83, CI 1.12-7.17, p = 0.037) or any meniscus surgeries (RR = 1.54, CI 1.03-2.29, p = 0.042), and patients with bulimia had a significantly increased prevalence of partial meniscectomies (RR = 1.80, CI 1.26-2.58, p = 0.002) or any meniscus surgeries (RR = 1.83, CI 1.29-2.60, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anorexia and bulimia are associated with increased prevalence of soft tissue injuries and surgeries. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of this risk, and patients presenting to clinics should be informed of the risks associated with these diagnoses and provided with resources promoting recovery to help prevent further injury or surgery.

Behavioral Mechanisms That Mediate Mental and Physical Health Improvements in People With Chronic Pain Who Receive a Digital Health Intervention: Prospective Cohort Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Preliminary evidence suggests that digital mental health intervention (Wysa for Chronic Pain) can improve mental and physical health in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain and coexisting symptoms of depression or anxiety. However, the behavioral mechanisms through which this intervention acts are not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify behavioral mechanisms that may mediate changes in mental and physical health associated with use of Wysa for Chronic Pain during orthopedic management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. We hypothesized that improved behavioral activation, pain acceptance, and sleep quality mediate improvements in self-reported mental and physical health.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort, pilot mediation analysis, adults with chronic (≥3 months) neck or back pain received the Wysa for Chronic Pain digital intervention, which uses a conversational agent and text-based access to human counselors to deliver cognitive behavioral therapy and related therapeutic content. Patient-reported outcomes and proposed mediators were collected at baseline and 1 month. The exposure of interest was participants' engagement (ie, total interactions) with the digital intervention. Proposed mediators were assessed using the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale-Short Form, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, and Athens Insomnia Scale. Outcomes included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety, Depression, Pain Interference, and Physical Function scores. A mediation analysis was conducted using the Baron and Kenny method, adjusting for age, sex, and baseline mediators and outcome values. P<.20 was considered significant for this pilot study.

RESULTS

Among 30 patients (mean age 59, SD 14, years; 21 [70%] female), the mediation effect of behavioral activation on the relationship between increased intervention engagement and improved anxiety symptoms met predefined statistical significance thresholds (indirect effect -0.4, 80% CI -0.7 to -0.1; P=.13, 45% of the total effect). The direction of mediation effect was generally consistent with our hypothesis for all other proposed mediator or outcome relationships, as well.

CONCLUSIONS

In a full-sized randomized controlled trial of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, behavioral activation, pain acceptance, and sleep quality may play an important role in mediating the relationship between use of a digital mental health intervention (Wysa for Chronic Pain) and improved mental and physical health.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05194722; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05194722.

Improvements in Physical Function and Pain Interference and Changes in Mental Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Care

Importance

Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients' mental health.

Objective

To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included adult patients treated by an orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center from June 22, 2015, to February 9, 2022. Eligible participants presented between 4 and 6 times during the study period for 1 or more musculoskeletal conditions and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit.

Exposure

PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether improvements in PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scores were associated with improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the anxiety model) or PROMIS Anxiety (for the depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as 3.0 points or more for PROMIS Anxiety and 3.2 points or more for PROMIS Depression.

Results

Among 11 236 patients (mean [SD] age, 57 [16] years), 7218 (64.2%) were women; 120 (1.1%) were Asian, 1288 (11.5%) were Black, and 9706 (86.4%) were White. Improvements in physical function (β = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.13; P < .001) and pain interference (β = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.26; P < .001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of 21 PROMIS points or more (95% CI, 20-23 points) on Physical Function or 12 points or more (95% CI, 12-12 points) on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.04; P < .001) and pain interference (β = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.05; P < .001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Patients seeking musculoskeletal care clinicians providing treatment cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety.

Multi-stakeholder perspectives regarding preferred modalities for mental health intervention delivered in the orthopedic clinic: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Although depressive and anxious symptoms negatively impact musculoskeletal health and orthopedic outcomes, a gap remains in identifying modalities through which mental health intervention can realistically be delivered during orthopedic care. The purpose of this study was to understand orthopedic stakeholders' perceptions regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of digital, printed, and in-person intervention modalities to address mental health as part of orthopedic care.

METHODS

This single-center, qualitative study was conducted within a tertiary care orthopedic department. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between January and May 2022. Two stakeholder groups were interviewed using a purposive sampling approach until thematic saturation was reached. The first group included adult orthopedic patients who presented for management of ≥ 3 months of neck or back pain. The second group included early, mid, and late career orthopedic clinicians and support staff members. Stakeholders' interview responses were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding approaches followed by thematic analysis. Patients also performed usability testing of one digital and one printed mental health intervention.

RESULTS

Patients included 30 adults out of 85 approached (mean (SD) age 59 [14] years, 21 (70%) women, 12 (40%) non-White). Clinical team stakeholders included 22 orthopedic clinicians and support staff members out of 25 approached (11 (50%) women, 6 (27%) non-White). Clinical team members perceived a digital mental health intervention to be feasible and scalable to implement, and many patients appreciated that the digital modality offered privacy, immediate access to resources, and the ability to engage during non-business hours. However, stakeholders also expressed that a printed mental health resource is still necessary to meet the needs of patients who prefer and/or can only engage with tangible, rather than digital, mental health resources. Many clinical team members expressed skepticism regarding the current feasibility of scalably incorporating in-person support from a mental health specialist into orthopedic care.

CONCLUSIONS

Although digital intervention offers implementation-related advantages over printed and in-person mental health interventions, a subset of often underserved patients will not currently be reached using exclusively digital intervention. Future research should work to identify combinations of effective mental health interventions that provide equitable access for orthopedic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Relationships between improvement in physical function, pain interference, and mental health in musculoskeletal patients

Importance

Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients' mental health.

Objective

To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care.

Design

Retrospective cohort study from June 22, 2015 to February 9, 2022.

Setting

Orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center.

Participants

Consecutive sample of adult patients who presented to the musculoskeletal clinic 4 to 6 times during the study period and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit.

Exposure

PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether: 1) PROMIS Anxiety and 2) PROMIS Depression scores improved as a function of improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores, after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the Anxiety model) and PROMIS Anxiety (for the Depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as ≥3.0 points for PROMIS Anxiety and ≥3.2 points for PROMIS Depression.

Results

Among 11,236 patients (mean [SD] age 57 [16] years), 9,706 (86%) were White, and 7,218 (64%) were women. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.14 [95% CI -0.15- -0.13], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.26 [0.25-0.26], p<0.001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of ≥21 [20-23] PROMIS points on Physical Function or ≥12 [12-12] points on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.05 [- 0.06- -0.04], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.04 [0.04-0.05], p<0.001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety.

Key Points

Question: Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, are improvements in physical function and pain interference associated with meaningful changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression?Findings: In this large cohort study, improvement by ≥2.3 population-level standard deviations (SD) on PROMIS Physical Function or ≥1.2 SD on PROMIS Pain Interference were required for any association with meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms. Improvements in physical function and pain interference were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.Meaning: Musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that exclusively addressing the physical aspect of a musculoskeletal condition will improve symptoms of depression or potentially even anxiety.