Risk of Malnutrition and Clinical Outcomes Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Units

Malnutrition in survivors of critical illness and long-term survival outcomes: A cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and associated risk factors among intensive care unit (ICU) survivors and to investigate whether malnutrition after ICU admission is associated with long-term survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected data from a National Health Insurance Service database in South Korea. Adults admitted to the ICU between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, who survived >1 year after the date of ICU admission were included. The statistical method used was multivariable Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

Overall, 228,702 ICU survivors were included. Malnutrition before and after ICU admission was diagnosed in 12,513 (5.5 %) and 18,487 (8.1 %) ICU survivors, respectively. The multivariable Cox regression model revealed that newly developed malnutrition after ICU admission was associated with a 1.49-fold increased risk of mortality between 1 and 5 years after ICU admission among survivors (hazard ratio: 1.49, 95 % confidence interval: 1.46-1.52; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition within 1 year of ICU admission was reported in 8.1 % of survivors. Notably, malnutrition after ICU admission was associated with an increased risk of mortality between 1 and 5 years after ICU admission among ICU survivors.

Skin Tears Preventable With a Gentle Approach: A Case Series

Skin tears are a major problem for patients and the health care professionals who treat them. Although opinions on their prevalence differ, it is estimated that they are encountered more frequently than pressure sores but are overlooked. Recommendations based on strong evidence were presented for the prevention and treatment of skin tears as classified by the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel. This case series includes the clinical status of 3 patients who developed skin tears while receiving care in the hospital, and the corrective and preventive practices related to skin tears. This article will contribute to raising the awareness of health care professionals in predicting, preventing, evaluating, and treating skin tears.

Association of malnutrition status with 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis using objective nutritional indices: a multicenter retrospective study in South Korea

BACKGROUND

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have emerged as important nutritional indices because they provide an objective assessment based on data. We aimed to investigate how these nutritional indices relate to outcomes in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively at five hospitals for patients aged ≥18 years receiving treatment for sepsis between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Serum albumin and total cholesterol concentrations, and peripheral lymphocytes were used to calculate the CONUT score and PNI. To identify predictors correlated with 30-day mortality, analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate among 9,763 patients was 15.8% (n=1,546). The median CONUT score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-7) and the median PNI score was 39.6 (IQR, 33.846.4). Higher 30-day mortality rates were associated with individuals with moderate (CONUT score: 5-8; PNI: 35-38) or severe (CONUT: 9-12; PNI: <35) malnutrition compared with those with no malnutrition (CONUT: 0-1; PNI: >38). With CONUT scores, the hazard ratio (HR) associated with moderate malnutrition was 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.87; P<0.001); for severe, HR=2.42 (95% CI, 1.95-3.02; P<0.001). With PNI scores, the HR for moderate malnutrition was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.09-1.53; P=0.003); for severe, HR=1.88 (95% CI, 1.67-2.12; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The nutritional indices CONUT score and PNI showed significant associations with mortality of sepsis patients within 30 days.

Early vs delayed enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition in hospitalized patients: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials

We conducted an umbrella review to summarize the existing evidence on the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) compared with other approaches, including delayed enteral nutrition (DEN), parenteral nutrition (PN), and oral feeding (OF) on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. We performed a systematic search up to December 2021, in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science. We included systematic reviews with meta-analyses (SRMAs) of randomized trials investigating EEN compared with DEN, PN, or OF for any clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. We used "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews" (AMSTAR2) and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for assessing the methodological quality of the systematic reviews and their included trial, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was rated using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach. We included 45 eligible SRMAs contributing with a total of 103 randomized controlled trials. The overall meta-analyses showed that patients who received EEN had statistically significant beneficial effects on most outcomes compared with any control (ie, DEN, PN, or OF), including mortality, sepsis, overall complications, infection complications, multiorgan failure, anastomotic leakage, length of hospital stay, time to flatus, and serum albumin levels. No statistically significant beneficial effects were found for risk of pneumonia, noninfectious complications, vomiting, wound infection, as well as number of days of ventilation, intensive care unit days, serum protein, and pre-serum albumin levels. Our results indicate that EEN may be preferred over DEN, PN, and OF because of the beneficial effects on many clinical outcomes.

Continuous versus Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review

Administration of enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) constitutes a major challenge due to the increased risk of complications, as well as the lack of well-trained healthcare professionals. EN is usually delivered via cyclic, continuous, or intermittent feeding; however, a number of potential barriers have been reported in the literature regarding different feeding regimens. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of continuous and intermittent bolus feeding on critically ill children. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and a clinical trial registry up to September 2022, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English language. Four studies met the inclusion criteria with a total population of 288 patients admitted to the PICU. Three studies were rated with a high risk of bias and one with some concerns. There was high heterogeneity between the studies in regard to the reporting of outcomes. Three studies measured the total time needed to reach prescribed caloric intake with conflicting results, while two studies evaluated the length of stay (LOS) in PICU with no difference between the two arms. One study assessed the time weaning from mechanical ventilation, favoring the bolus group. No data were provided for gastric residual volume (GRV), anthropometric measurements, and biochemical markers. Additional randomized trials with better methodology are needed to assess the efficacy of the two enteral feeding regimens in critically ill PICU patients.

Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill Score, A Prognostic Marker of Morbidity and Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Critically ill (CI) patients, especially those requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) are at a higher risk of malnutrition, which in turn is associated with increased hospitalization and excess mortality. The modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score, a predictor of mortality, has not been validated adequately in CI Indian patients. Thus, this study evaluated the mNUTRIC score as a prognostic marker of morbidity and mortality in CI patients requiring MV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study was performed, between January 2018 and June 2019, in the intensive critical care unit (ICCU) of the medicine department of a tertiary care hospital. A total of 250 patients aged above 12 years, admitted in ICCU, and requiring MV for &gt;48 hours were included. Based on the data collected, mNUTRIC score was calculated and patients were classified as at low (0-4) and high (5-9) nutritional risk. Mortality was the outcome variable.

RESULTS

More than a quarter of patients had a high mNUTRIC score (28.4%) and the overall mortality was 35.6%. A significantly greater proportion of non-survivors had a high mNUTRIC score (p-value&lt;0.0001). Likewise, the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and mNUTRIC score (all p-values&lt;0.0001) were significantly higher among the non-survivors than the survivors. On receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a cutoff value of &gt;2 predicted mortality [area under the curve (AUC): 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.778-0.874] with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 80.9, 76.4, 65.5, and 87.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

At a cutoff of &gt;2, mNUTRIC score had high sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of mortality.