1
|
Giddings HL, Yang PF, Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Ng KS. Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae088. [PMID: 38740552 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ('pouch surgery') provides a chance to avoid permanent ileostomy after proctocolectomy, but can be associated with poor outcomes. The relationship between hospital-level/surgeon factors (including volume) and outcomes after pouch surgery is of increasing interest given arguments for increasing centralization of these complex procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the literature describing the influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS A systematic review was performed of studies reporting outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. The MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched (1978-2022). Data on outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, readmission, operative approach, reconstruction, postoperative parameters, and pouch-specific outcomes (failure), were extracted. Associations between hospital-level/surgeon factors and these outcomes were summarized. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022352851). RESULTS A total of 29 studies, describing 41 344 patients who underwent a pouch procedure, were included; 3 studies demonstrated higher rates of pouch failure in lower-volume centres, 4 studies demonstrated higher reconstruction rates in higher-volume centres, 2 studies reported an inverse association between annual hospital pouch volume and readmission rates, and 4 studies reported a significant association between complication rates and surgeon experience. CONCLUSION This review summarizes the growing body of evidence that supports centralization of pouch surgery to specialist high-volume inflammatory bowel disease units. Centralization of this technically demanding surgery that requires dedicated perioperative medical and nursing support should facilitate improved patient outcomes and help train the next generation of pouch surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh L Giddings
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phillip F Yang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen KA, Pak J, Agala CB, Stem JM, Guillem JG, Barnes EL, Herfarth HH, Kapadia MR. Factors Associated With Performing IPAA After Total Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:674-680. [PMID: 38276963 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND IPAA is considered the procedure of choice for restorative surgery after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Previous studies have examined the rate of IPAA within individual states but not at the national level in the United States. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the rate of IPAA after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis in a national population and identify factors associated with IPAA. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS This study was performed in the United States. PATIENTS Patients who were aged 18 years or older and who underwent total colectomy between 2009 and 2019 for a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis were identified within a commercial database. This database excluded patients with public insurance, including all patients older than 65 years with Medicare. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was IPAA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between covariates and the likelihood of undergoing IPAA. RESULTS In total, 2816 patients were included, of whom 1414 (50.2%) underwent IPAA, 928 (33.0%) underwent no further surgery, and 474 (16.8%) underwent proctectomy with end ileostomy. Younger age, lower comorbidities, elective case, and laparoscopic approach in the initial colectomy were significantly associated with IPAA but socioeconomic status was not. LIMITATIONS This retrospective study included only patients with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS A total of 50.2% of patients who had total colectomy for ulcerative colitis underwent IPAA, and younger age, lower comorbidities, and elective cases are associated with a higher rate of IPAA placement. This study emphasizes the importance of ensuring follow-up with colorectal surgeons to provide the option of restorative surgery, especially for patients undergoing urgent or emergent colectomies. See Video Abstract . FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON LA REALIZACIN DE ANASTOMOSIS ANALBOLSA ILEAL DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA TOTAL POR COLITIS ULCEROSA ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis ileo-anal se considera el procedimiento de elección para la cirugía reparadora tras la colectomía total por colitis ulcerosa. Estudios previos han examinado la tasa de anastomosis ileo-anal dentro de los estados individuales, pero no a nivel nacional en los Estados Unidos.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la tasa de anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal después de la colectomía total para la colitis ulcerosa en una población nacional e identificar los factores asociados con la anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal.DISEÑO:Se trata de un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo.LUGAR:Este estudio se realizó en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Los pacientes que tenían ≥18 años de edad que se sometieron a colectomía total entre 2009 y 2019 para un diagnóstico de colitis ulcerosa fueron identificados dentro de una base de datos comercial. Esta base de datos excluyó a los pacientes con seguro público, incluidos todos los pacientes >65 años con Medicare.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:El resultado primario fue la anastomosis ileal bolsa-anal. Se utilizó una regresión logística multivariable para evaluar la asociación entre las covariables y la probabilidad de someterse a una anastomosis ileal.RESULTADOS:En total, se incluyeron 2.816 pacientes, de los cuales 1.414 (50,2%) se sometieron a anastomosis ileo-anal, 928 (33,0%) no se sometieron a ninguna otra intervención quirúrgica y 474 (16,8%) se sometieron a proctectomía con ileostomía terminal. La edad más joven, las comorbilidades más bajas, el caso electivo, y el abordaje laparoscópico en la colectomía inicial se asociaron significativamente con la anastomosis ileal bolsa-anal, pero no el estatus socioeconómico.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó sólo pacientes con seguro comercial.CONCLUSIONES:Un 50,2% de los pacientes se someten a anastomosis ileo-anal y la edad más joven, las comorbilidades más bajas y los casos electivos se asocian con una mayor tasa de colocación de anastomosis ileo-anal. Esto subraya la importancia de asegurar el seguimiento con cirujanos colorrectales para ofrecer la opción de cirugía reparadora, especialmente en pacientes sometidos a colectomías urgentes o emergentes. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Chen
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joyce Pak
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Chris B Agala
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jonathan M Stem
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jose G Guillem
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Muneera R Kapadia
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hawkins RL, Zia M, Hind D, Lobo AJ. Inequalities in Healthcare Access, Experience and Outcomes in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae077. [PMID: 38600759 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are incurable diseases that require lifelong access to health services. Accumulating evidence of inequalities in health care access, experience, and outcomes for individuals with IBD is apparent. This review aimed to describe the inequalities in healthcare access, experiences, and outcomes of care for adults with IBD, to identify research gaps, and to identify future research priorities in this area. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to retrieve quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods evidence from 3 databases (EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL) published between January 1, 2000, and September 27, 2023. RESULTS Fifty-one studies met the criteria for inclusion. The majority (42 of 51) focused on IBD health outcomes, followed by healthcare access (24 of 51). Significantly fewer investigated patient experiences of IBD healthcare (8 of 51). Most available studies reported on race/ethnic disparities of healthcare (33 of 51), followed by inequalities driven by socioeconomic differences (12 of 51), rurality (7 of 51), gender and sex (3 of 51), age (2 of 51), culture (2 of 51), literacy (1 of 51), and sexuality (1 of 51). Inflammatory bowel disease patients from Black, Asian, and Hispanic ethnic groups had significantly poorer health outcomes. A lack of research was found in the sexual and gender minority community (1 of 51). No research was found to investigate inequalities in IBD patients with learning disabilities or autism. CONCLUSIONS Further research, particularly utilizing qualitative methods, is needed to understand health experiences of underserved patient populations with IBD. Cultural humility in IBD care is required to better serve individuals with IBD of Black and Asian race/ethnicity. The lack of research amongst sexual and gender minority groups with IBD, and with learning disabilities, poses a risk of creating inequalities within inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L Hawkins
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Maryam Zia
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Hind
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alan J Lobo
- Sheffield Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giddings HL, Ng KS, Solomon MJ, Steffens D, Van Buskirk J, Young J. High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship. ANZ J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38525855 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total (procto)colectomy is indicated in 15%-20% of ulcerative colitis(UC) patients during their disease course. Reconstruction options to avoid a permanent ileostomy include an ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). This study aimed to investigate reconstruction rates using Australian-based population-level data, and factors influencing reconstruction. METHODS A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. Patients with UC who underwent total (procto)colectomy with a minimum of 1-year follow up were included. The main outcome was reconstruction with either IPAA or IRA. The influence of hospital and patient factors on reconstruction rates was assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 1047 patients underwent a (procto)colectomy for UC (mean age 45.9 years [SD ± 18.3], 640 [61.1%] male). The 5-year reconstruction rate was 55% (IPAA 89%). Advanced age, emergent colectomy, higher comorbidity burden, and geographical remoteness were significantly associated with lower reconstruction rates. A lower reconstruction rate was also observed in the most recent time-period (2014-2019) (aHR 0.68[95% CI 0.54-0.86]), and where index (procto)colectomy was performed in low-volume (<1 pouch/year) pouch hospitals (aHR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.82]). CONCLUSIONS NSW Australia has the highest reported rate of reconstruction following UC (procto)colectomy globally. However, rates reduced in the most recent time-period. There was variation in reconstruction rates across centres, with primary and overall reconstruction rates proportionate to hospital pouch volume. Reconstruction rates were also lower for patients living outside major cities. To ensure equitable opportunities for reconstruction, patients being considered for IBD pouch surgery should be centralized to a limited number of specialist pouch centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh L Giddings
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joe Van Buskirk
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Public Health Research Analytics and Methods for Evidence, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giddings HL, Ng KS, Solomon MJ, Steffens D, Van Buskirk J, Young J. Population outcomes, trends and the future of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: a 19-year New South Wales data linkage study. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2686-2696. [PMID: 37449791 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is considered the gold standard reconstructive option in ulcerative colitis (UC). Recent efforts to improve pouch outcomes have seen a push towards centralisation of surgery. This study aimed to document outcomes following pouch surgery at a population level within New South Wales (NSW), and identify factors associated with, and temporal trends of these outcomes. METHODS A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. The primary outcome was pouch failure in patients with UC who underwent IPAA. The influence of hospital level factors (including annual volume) and patient demographic variables on this outcome were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modelling. Temporal trends in annual volume and evidence for centralisation over the studied period were assessed using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS The annual volume of UC pouches reduced over the study period. The pouch failure rates were 8.6% (95% CI 6.3-10.8%) and 10.6% (95% CI 8.0-13.1%) at 5- and 10-years, respectively. Increasing age and non-elective admission were associated with higher failure rates. One-third of UC pouches (31.6%) were performed in a single institution, which averaged 6.5 pouches/year throughout the study period. Three-quarters (19/25) of NSW public hospitals who performed pouches performed less than one UC pouch annually. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes following UC pouch surgery in NSW are comparable with global standards. Concentrating IBD pouch surgery with the aim of producing specialist surgical teams may be a reasonable way forward in NSW and would ensure equity of access and facilitate research and training collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh L Giddings
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joe Van Buskirk
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Public Health Research Analytics and Methods for Evidence, Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kitahata S, Furukawa S, Miyake T, Shiraishi K, Tange K, Hashimoto Y, Yagi S, Ninomiya T, Suzuki S, Shibata N, Murakami H, Ohashi K, Tomida H, Yamamoto Y, Takeshita E, Ikeda Y, Hiasa Y. Association between socioeconomic status and mucosal healing in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2022; 9:bmjgast-2022-001000. [PMID: 36261231 PMCID: PMC9582296 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Socioeconomic status is a risk factor for worse outcomes in many diseases. However, evidence on the association between socioeconomic status and clinical outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited. In the clinical setting, the therapeutic goal for UC is to achieve mucosal healing (MH). Thus, the aim of this study is to examine the association between socioeconomic status and MH in patients with UC. Methods The study population consisted of 298 patients with UC. Education status and household income were divided into three groups based on a self-administered questionnaire. MH and complete MH were defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0–1 and 0, respectively. The association of socioeconomic status with MH and complete MH was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients with UC were divided into a younger group (<51 years old) and an older group (≥51 years old) based on median age. Results The percentage of MH and complete MH was 62.4% and 25.2%, respectively. In all patients, socioeconomic status was not associated with MH and complete MH, respectively. In the older group, education but not household income was independently positively associated with MH and complete MH. In contrast, in the younger group, no association between socioeconomic status and MH and complete MH was found. Conclusion In older Japanese patients with UC, education status but not household income was independently positively associated with MH and complete MH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shogo Kitahata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | | | - Teruki Miyake
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Kana Shiraishi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Tange
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Therapeutics, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Yu Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Sen Yagi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Imabari Hospital, Imabari, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Ninomiya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Seiyuu Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Corporation Sumitomo Besshi Hospital, Niihama, Japan
| | - Naozumi Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital, Niihama, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Murakami
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Eiji Takeshita
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Therapeutics, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Yoshio Ikeda
- Endoscopy Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Yoichi Hiasa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Booth A, Ford W, Brennan E, Magwood G, Forster E, Curran T. Towards Equitable Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of Disparities in Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 28:1405-1419. [PMID: 34553754 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing evidence for disparities in inflammatory bowel disease is fragmented and heterogenous. Underlying mechanisms for differences in outcomes based on race and socioeconomic status remain undefined. We performed a systematic review of the literature to examine disparities in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in the United States. METHODS Electronic databases were searched from 2000 through June 11, 2021, to identify studies addressing disparities in surgical treatment for adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Eligible English-language publications comparing the use or outcomes of surgery by racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, geographic, and/or institutional factors were included. Studies were grouped according to whether outcomes of surgery were reported or surgery itself was the relevant end point (utilization). Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. RESULTS Forty-five studies were included. Twenty-four reported surgical outcomes and 21addressed utilization. Race/ethnicity was considered in 96% of studies, socioeconomic status in 44%, geographic factors in 27%, and hospital/surgeon factors in 22%. Although study populations and end points were heterogeneous, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo abdominal surgery when hospitalized; they were more likely to have a complication when they did have surgery. Differences based on race were correlated with socioeconomic factors but frequently remained significant after adjustments for insurance and baseline health. CONCLUSIONS Surgical disparities based on sociologic and structural factors reflect unidentified differences in multidisciplinary disease management. A broad, multidimensional approach to disparities research with more granular and diverse data sources is needed to improve health care quality and equity for inflammatory bowel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Booth
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.,Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Wilson Ford
- College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Emily Brennan
- Colbert Education Center and Library, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Gayenell Magwood
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Erin Forster
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Thomas Curran
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alsafi Z, Snell A, Segal JP. Prevalence of 'pouch failure' of the ileoanal pouch in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:357-364. [PMID: 34825957 PMCID: PMC8803821 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04067-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The ileoanal pouch (IPAA) provides patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) that have not responded to medical therapy an option to retain bowel continuity and defecate without the need for a long-term stoma. Despite good functional outcomes, some pouches fail, requiring permanent diversion, pouchectomy, or a redo pouch. The incidence of pouch failure ranges between 2 and 15% in the literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to define the prevalence of pouch failure in patients with UC who have undergone IPAA using population-based studies. METHODS We searched Embase, Embase classic and PubMed from 1978 to 31st of May 2021 to identify cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of pouch failure in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who underwent IPAA for UC. RESULTS Twenty-six studies comprising 23,389 patients were analysed. With < 5 years of follow-up, the prevalence of pouch failure was 5% (95%CI 3-10%). With ≥ 5 but < 10 years of follow-up, the prevalence was 5% (95%CI 4-7%). This increased to 9% (95%CI 7-16%) with ≥ 10 years of follow-up. The overall prevalence of pouch failure was 6% (95%CI 5-8%). CONCLUSIONS The overall prevalence of pouch failure in patients over the age of 18 who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy in UC is 6%. These data are important for counselling patients considering this operation. Importantly, for those patients with UC being considered for a pouch, their disease course has often resulted in both physical and psychological morbidity and hence providing accurate expectations for these patients is vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alice Snell
- Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|