Quality of life after surgery for colon cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome: partial versus subtotal colectomy

Endoscopic surveillance for colorectal cancer and its precursor lesions in Lynch syndrome; time for some policy shifts?

BACKGROUND

While numerous studies have demonstrated variations in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence among Lynch Syndrome (LS)-associated germline pathogenic variant (gPV) carriers, limited data are available regarding tailoring surveillance and treatment strategies. The main goal of this study was to estimate whether personalised care could be offered based on the different gPVs (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2). Additionally, the outcome from patient-shared care for early (T1) CRC was investigated.

METHODS

The study is performed as a single centre retrospective analysis of our cohort of patients with a LS-associated gPV in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2. Colon surveillance data from between January 1978 to February 2024 were collected. Analyses were performed to identify differences in incidence of precursor lesions and CRC between the different variants and treatment variation for CRC in LS.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 621 LS individuals 496 (133 MLH1, 107 MSH2, 180 MSH6 and 76 PMS2) could be included in this study. Analyses revealed that, despite adequate surveillance intervals and lower adenoma incidence, individuals with a gPV in MLH1 or MSH2 have higher CRC incidences compared to MSH6 or PMS2. Most detected CRC lesions were early stage (T1) CRCs. Treatment for T1 CRC varied considerably; in 68% of the cases deviating from a subtotal colectomy, with nearly equivalent recurrence rates.

DISCUSSION

Based on higher precursor lesion detection and lower CRC incidences in LS individuals with a gPV in MSH6 or PMS2 under biannual endoscopic surveillance, this study supports the potential for extended surveillance intervals in the latter group. As treatment for the detected T1 CRCs varied considerably with nearly equivalent recurrence rates, in selected cases less invasive interventions for LS individuals could be considered.

Metachronous colorectal cancer risks after extended or segmental resection in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 Lynch syndrome: multicentre study from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database

This first prospective observational study evaluates the impact of extended versus segmental colorectal surgery on the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with Lynch syndrome, analyzing data from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database version 5. Extended resection significantly reduced the risk of metachronous CRC in path_MLH1, path_MSH2, and path_MSH6 carriers compared to segmental resection.

Emerging therapeutic strategies in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer and the role of MMR testing

Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary cancer predisposition, accounting for 1-5% of colorectal cancer cases, and is driven by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Despite established diagnostic criteria, such as the Amsterdam guidelines, Lynch syndrome remains largely underdiagnosed. To address this gap, universal tumour screening has been introduced for all newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, significantly improving early detection. The surgical management of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome remains controversial. While extended colectomy reduces the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer, surgical strategies must be carefully individualised based on patient-specific factors. Chemoprevention with aspirin has shown promise in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer, with ongoing trials investigating optimal dosing. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionised the treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High/deficient Mismatch Repair colorectal cancer, offering durable responses and significant survival benefits. In addition, the neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is paving the way for non-surgical interventions, potentially transforming the management of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome. A multidisciplinary approach and continued research are essential to optimise cancer prevention, treatment and quality of life for people with Lynch syndrome.

Segmental versus extended colectomy for colorectal cancer in patients with lynch syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The decision to perform segmental or extended colectomy in Lynch syndrome (LS) patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide updated evidence for segmental versus extended colectomy in LS carriers with CRC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published until January 2024 comparing segmental and extended colectomies for CRC in patients with LS. Risk ratio (RR) was used to evaluate binary endpoints with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using the R Software, version 4.2.3.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies comprising 2303 LS carriers with CRC, of whom 1724 (74.9%) patients underwent segmental colectomy and 579 (25.1%) patients underwent extended colectomy. Segmental colectomy significantly increased metachronous CRC (mCRC) (RR 2.87; 95% CI 2.03-4.07; and p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups for 5-year overall survival (OS) (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-1.03; and p = 0.14), 10-year OS (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96-1.04; and p = 0.80), and mortality (RR 1.63; 95% CI 0.90-2.97; and p = 0.11). There were no significant linear associations between the outcome of mCRC and age at the time of primary CRC, sex, primary CRC location, and pathogenic LS variant.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, segmental colectomy significantly increased mCRC compared with extended colectomy after the first surgery for CRC in patients with LS. However, there were no significant differences between groups for 5- and 10-year OS and mortality.

Practice Patterns and Trends in the Surgical Management of Mismatch Repair Deficient Colon Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Defects in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway can predispose individuals to colorectal cancer (CRC), with germline mutations in this pathway leading to Lynch syndrome. Consequently, universal MMR testing is recommended for all newly diagnosed CRC patients to detect mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D) tumors, enabling informed treatment decisions. Given the increased potential for metachronous disease in patients with Lynch syndrome, the current guidelines for surgical management of Lynch-associated colon cancer recommend extended resection in patients under age 60.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of nonmetastatic CRC was performed from the National Cancer Database to evaluate the current trends and practice patterns in the surgical management of MMR-D colon cancer, as well as assess the factors influencing choice of surgical procedure.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2020, 98,112 nonmetastatic CRC patients were identified, with 19.93% being MMR-D. MMR-D colon cancer patients were more likely to undergo extended resection than those with mismatch repair proficient tumors (9.4% versus 4.2%, P < 0.001). When accounting for approximately one-fourth of MMR-D colon cancers being attributable to Lynch syndrome, the frequency of extended resection was less than expected (9.4% versus 25%, P < 0.001). MMR-D patients under age 60 were more likely to undergo extended resection than those over age 60 (9% versus 3%) (odds ratio [OR] 3.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.06-4.15). Several factors were associated with decreased rate of extended resection: uninsured (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84), Black race (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.82), treatment at nonacademic centers (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.97), and crowfly distance >25 miles (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.14-3.45).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide valuable insight into the current surgical practice patterns in the management of MMR-D colon cancers and possibly colon cancers associated with Lynch syndrome.

A watch-and-wait approach for metachronous multiple colon cancer following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a case report

The application of immunotherapy for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently a research hotspot, and neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown initial success in treating CRC. The watch-and-wait (W&W) approach is often used after achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) following preoperative treatment of low rectal cancer. However, thus far, the W&W approach has not been reported for patients with colon cancer. Here, we report the case of a 64-year-old patient with heterogeneous multigenic CRC who achieved cCR after five sessions of neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery. A W&W approach was used to spare the patient from surgery. A 64-year-old male presented with intermittent abdominal pain. A colonoscopy examination detected an irregular cauliflower-like mass near the hepatic flexure of the ascending colon. The biopsy results indicated adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon. The patient was administered pembrolizumab (200 mg, ivgtt, q3w). After one cycle of treatment, the intestinal obstruction symptoms disappeared, and the treatment was continued for additional three sessions. After complete clinical remission of the tumor was confirmed, the W&W approach was adopted. Follow-up CT scans and colonoscopy examinations confirmed no local tumor regeneration or metastasis. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is effective for patients with DNA mismatch repair gene deficiency and/or microsatellite instability high with a high rate of cCR or pathologic complete response. The W&W approach may also be suitable for patients with colon cancer. The safety and feasibility of watch and wait in patients with colon cancer need to be verified by more clinical data.

Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) in China are increasing in recent years. The clarified pathogenesis and detectable precancerous lesions of CRC make it possible to prevent, screen, and diagnose CRC at an early stage. With the development of endoscopic and surgical techniques, the choice of treatment for early CRC is also worth further discussion, and accordingly, a standard follow-up program after treatment needs to be established.

METHODS

This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed following the recommended process of the World Health Organization, adopting Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) in assessing evidence quality, and using the Evidence to Decision framework to formulate clinical recommendations, thereby minimizing bias and increasing transparency of the CPG development process. We used the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) as reporting and conduct guides to ensure the guideline's completeness and transparency.

RESULTS

This CPG comprises 46 recommendations concerning prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of CRC. In these recommendations, we have indicated protective and risk factors for CRC and made recommendations for chemoprevention. We proposed a suitable screening program for CRC based on the Chinese context. We also provided normative statements for the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of CRC based on existing clinical evidence and guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The 46 recommendations in this CPG are formed with consideration for stakeholders' values and preferences, feasibility, and acceptability. Recommendations are generalizable to resource-limited settings with similar CRC epidemiology pattern as China.

Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. There are disparities in the epidemiology of CRC across different populations, most probably due to differences in exposure to lifestyle and environmental factors related to CRC. Prevention is the most effective method for controlling CRC. Primary prevention includes determining and avoiding modifiable risk factors (e.g., alcohol consumption, smoking, and dietary factors) as well as increasing protective factors (e.g., physical activity, aspirin). Further studies, especially randomized, controlled trials, are needed to clarify the association between CRC incidence and exposure to different risk factors or protective factors. Detection and removal of precancerous colorectal lesions is also an effective strategy for controlling CRC. Multiple factors, both at the individual and community levels (e.g., patient preferences, availability of screening modalities, costs, benefits, and adverse events), should be taken into account in designing and implementing CRC screening programs. Health policymakers should consider the best decision in identifying the starting age and selection of the most effective screening strategies for the target population. This review aims to present updated evidence on the epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of CRC.

Focal Cancer in Colitis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a known complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Widely accepted guidelines recommend that patients with ulcerative colitis diagnosed with CRC undergo total proctocolectomy with or without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and that patients with Crohn's disease and CRC undergo either total colectomy or proctocolectomy. These approaches are ideal for preventing synchronous and metachronous cancer, minimizing risk of refractory colitis requiring reoperation, and is the appropriate treatment for the vast majority of patients with IBD who are diagnosed with CRC and require surgical intervention. Segmental colectomy, however, may be considered in select patients with IBD and CRC, specifically in elderly patients with short disease duration, in patients with mild colitis identified preoperatively, in patients with high operative risk and prohibitive comorbidities, and in patients whose CRC appears to be sporadic as opposed to colitis-associated. Patients undergoing segmental resection must be closely surveilled postoperatively for dysplasia, recurrent cancer, and refractory colitis.

Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after colectomy for first colon cancer in Lynch syndrome: multicenter retrospective study in Japan

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (mCRC) and explored the optimal extent of colectomy in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) and first colon cancer (fCC) in Japan, where the extent of colectomy for colon cancer (CC) is shorter than that in Western countries.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic and survival data of patients with LS who developed CC were collected from a nationwide database and analyzed retrospectively. The cumulative incidence of mCRC after actual segmental colectomy was compared with that of mCRC when more extensive colectomy was assumed.

RESULTS

There were 142 eligible patients (65 female). The median age at fCC surgery was 46.5 (range: 14-80) years. The cumulative incidence of 5-, 10-, and 20-year mCRC rate was 13.4%, 20.8%, and 53.6%, respectively. The incidence was higher in the left-sided group (splenic flexure to rectosigmoid colon, n = 54) than in the right-sided group (cecum to transvers colon, n = 88) (66.3% vs. 45.3% in 20 years, P < 0.01). Assuming that all patients would have undergone hemicolectomy or total colectomy, the estimated mCRC risk was 41.5% and 9.4% (P < 0.01, vs. actual procedures), respectively. The 20-year overall survival rate of all the patients was 83.3% without difference by fCC sidedness (P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the incidence of mCRC, patients with genetically diagnosed LS and fCC, preferentially located in the left-sided colon, may need to undergo more extended colectomy than that usually performed in Japan. However, such extended colectomy should be counterbalanced with favorable overall survival and actual risk of mCRC development.

Metachronous colorectal cancer risk according to Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant after extensive versus partial colectomy in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Extensive colectomy (subtotal or total colectomy) is often advised for carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer. However, the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer might differ by Lynch syndrome variant, meaning that partial colectomy, which has better functional outcomes, might be adequate for some patients with low-risk variants. We aimed to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy and extensive colectomy in carriers of Lynch syndrome with different pathogenic variants.

METHODS

For this retrospective cohort study, carriers of Lynch syndrome with colorectal cancer in the Netherlands were identified by linkage of the Dutch Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors (StOET) database and the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology (PALGA) database. Data on demographics, Lynch syndrome variants, colorectal cancers, surgery types, mortality, and surveillance colonoscopies were extracted. Data on colorectal cancer and surveillance colonoscopies were updated until Feb 28, 2022. Data on survival status was updated until Feb 7, 2022. MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM were classified as high-risk variants and MSH6 and PMS2 as low-risk variants. Patients for whom the type of surgery was unknown were excluded. Cox regression time-to-event analyses were done to assess the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer in four subgroups based on pathogenic variant (high-risk vs low-risk variants) and the extent of surgery (extensive colectomy vs partial colectomy). Sex, age at the time of primary colorectal cancer, primary colorectal cancer stage, performance of surveillance colonoscopies, adherence to the surveillance guidelines, and time period of primary colorectal cancer diagnosis were added to the model as possible confounders. Metachronous colorectal cancer was defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed more than 6 months after the primary colorectal cancer. Patients were censored at time of death or assembly of the database.

FINDINGS

Of 1908 carriers of Lynch syndrome registered in StOET, 532 with a history of colorectal cancer were identified after linkage with PALGA. Five carriers were excluded because of an unknown surgery type, leaving 527 in our sample (mean age at primary colorectal cancer 48·7 years [SD 12·1]; 274 [52%] male and 253 [48%] female). 121 (23%) patients developed metachronous colorectal cancer (median time from primary colorectal cancer to metachronous colorectal cancer 11·0 years [IQR 2·1-17·8]). Metachronous colorectal cancer occurred in 12 (12%) of 97 patients with high-risk variants and extensive colectomy, in 85 (32%) of 267 patients with high-risk variants and partial colectomy, in zero (0%) of 11 patients with low-risk variants and extensive colectomy, and in 24 (16%) of 152 patients with low-risk variants and partial colectomy. Partial colectomy was associated with a higher risk of metachronous colorectal cancer than extensive colectomy in the high-risk variant group (hazard ratio 1·97, 95% CI 1·04-3·73; p=0·039). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer did not differ between carriers of low-risk variants who had partial colectomy and those of high-risk variants who had extensive colectomy (1·14, 0·55-2·36; p=0·72).

INTERPRETATION

The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer after partial colectomy in carriers of low-risk variants is similar to the risk after extensive colectomy in carriers of high-risk variants. This finding suggests that partial colectomy followed by endoscopic surveillance is an appropriate management approach to treat colorectal cancer in carriers of low-risk Lynch syndrome variants.

FUNDING

None.

Current Surgical Concepts in Lynch Syndrome and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Background

Approximately 5% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. The natural history of these syndromes differs from sporadic cancers, and due to their increased risk of metachronous carcinomas, surgical approaches also differ. This review focuses on the current recommendations for surgical treatment and what evidence has led to these recommendations in the most clinically relevant hereditary CRC syndromes: Lynch syndrome (LS) and (attenuated) familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Summary

LS has no common phenotype and is caused by individual germline variants in one of the mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2). Because each gene is associated with a different risk of metachronous cancer, guidelines now differentiate between genes in their recommendations for oncology interventions. Classical and attenuated FAP are caused by germline mutations in the APC gene and have a characteristic phenotype. Although correlations exist between phenotype and genotype, the indication for surgery is predominantly based on clinical manifestation rather than specific gene mutations.

Key Message

Currently, the recommendation on the two diseases tends to go in opposite directions: while some forms of FAP may require less extensive surgery, in some LS patients, more sophisticated knowledge of metachronous carcinoma risk leads to more extensive surgery.

Surgery for synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancer: segmental or extensive colectomy?

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of surgical approach on morbidity, mortality, and the oncological outcomes of synchronous (SC) and metachronous (MC) colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

All patients undergoing resection for double location CRC (SC or MC) between 2006 and 2020 were included. The exclusion criteria were polyposis or SC located on the same side.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (age, 64.8 years; male, 78%) with SC (n = 41; 61%) or MC (n = 26; 39%) were included. SC was treated with segmental colectomy (right and left colectomy/proctectomy; n = 19) or extensive colectomy (subtotal/total colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy with pouch; n = 22). Segmental colectomy was associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage (47.4 vs. 13.6%; p = 0.04) and a higher rate of medical morbidity (47.4 vs. 16.6%; p = 0.04). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was similar. For MC, the second cancer was treated by iterative colectomy (n = 12) or extensive colectomy (n = 14) and there was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the two surgical approaches. The median follow-up period was 42.4 ± 29.1 months. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival of the SC and MC groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive colectomy should be preferred for SC to reduce morbidity and improve the prognosis. In contrast, iterative colectomy can be performed safely for patients with MC.

The evaluation of postoperative bowel dysfunction in Japanese patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The present study assessed postoperative bowel dysfunction in Japanese patients with rectal cancer, including patients who underwent preoperative radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

A total of 277 rectal cancer patients who underwent primary resection were included in the analyses. A questionnaire survey was administered using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score and Wexner score. Scores were determined one year after rectal surgery or diverting ileostomy closure. The LARS score was categorized as minor LARS (21-29) and major LARS (30-42).

RESULTS

The proportions of patients with minor and major LARS were significantly larger and Wexner scores significantly higher in patients with distal tumors and a lower anastomosis level than in those with proximal tumors and a higher anastomosis level. Among the patients with lower rectal cancer, the proportions with minor and major LARS were similar between those with and without preoperative RT. The Wexner scores in patients with preoperative RT were significantly higher than in patients without RT. A distal tumor location and lower anastomosis level were independent risk factors of major LARS in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

A distal tumor location, low anastomosis level, and preoperative RT might be associated with postoperative bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer patients.

Survival outcomes associated with Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer and metachronous rate after subtotal/total versus segmental colectomy: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome is associated with the most common form of heritable bowel cancer. There remains limited level 1 evidence on survival outcomes and rate of metachronous tumor associated with Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of original studies was performed on Ovid searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE, and Clinical Trials databases from inception of database to February 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was followed. The data were pooled using a random-effects model. All of the P values were 2-tailed, and statistical analysis was performed using RevMan v. 5.3 Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

From 1,942 studies, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The five-year overall survival was 89.5% (82.0-94.1%), P < .01; I² = 89%. The ten-year overall survival was 80.5% (68.7-88.6%), P < .01; I² = 81%. The fifteen-year overall survival was 70% (33.7%-91.5%), P < .01; I² = 93%. Univariate meta-regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference in 5-year overall survival by sex, age, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, nor tumor location (right versus left colon). The metachronous tumor rate was 12% to 33% with a follow-up period of up to 15 years, significantly lower in patients who underwent subtotal/total colectomy (0-6%).

CONCLUSION

The overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer with Lynch syndrome was approximately 90% at 5 years, 80% at 10 years, and 70% at 15 years. The metachronous tumor rate was approximately 10% to 30% at up to 15 years, significantly improved by subtotal/total colectomy.

Management of Dietary Habits and Diarrhea in Fap Individuals: A Mediterranean Low-Inflammatory Dietary Intervention

Background: A total colectomy and a frequent life-long endoscopic surveillance are guaranteed to patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) to reduce their risk of duodenal and rectal stump cancers. However, after surgery, individuals with FAP suffer from an increased number of diarrheal discharges that force them to dietary restrictions. A non-randomized pilot study was conducted to assess whether a three-month low-inflammatory Mediterranean dietary intervention reduces gastro-intestinal markers of inflammation in FAP individuals. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the participant’s adherence to the proposed dietary recommendations and the change in their number of diarrheal discharges. Methods: 26 FAP individuals aged >18 years, who underwent a total colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis and were involved in the surveillance program at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, were included in the present analysis. Results: FAP individuals significantly reduced the Not recommended foods (p-value: 0.002) and increased the consumption of the Recommended ones (p-value: 0.075). The adherence to the proposed dietary recommendations was accompanied by a significant decrease in the number of diarrheal discharges (p-value: 0.008). Conclusions: This study suggests that adhering to a low-inflammatory Mediterranean diet has a potential protective effect on the number of diarrheal discharges in FAP individuals.

Deciding the operation type according to mismatch repair status among hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients: should a tailored approach be applied, or does one size fit all?

BACKGROUND

Although extended colectomy (EC) was recommended for HNPCC patients, previous studies did not show significantly improved overall survival. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stain of mismatch repair (MMR) gene protein expression is now a feasible and reliable test clinically. Therefore, we tried to investigate whether we could use MMR IHC stain to select operation types in HNPCC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2013, 186 HNPCC patients were collected. Status of MMR protein expression, perioperative clinic-pathological variables and post-operative follow up status were analyzed by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent (121 of 186) patients of these HNPCC patients demonstrated loss of at least one MMR protein. There were several significant differences existing between deficient MMR (dMMR) and proficient MMR (pMMR) subgroups in terms of clinic-pathological characteristics. With the average follow-up duration of 93.9 months, we observed significantly high risk of developing metachronous CRC between SC and EC subgroups (crude rate 8.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.035). However, no significant difference was observed among the presence of extra-colonic tumors (12.4% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.284). The positive and negative prediction rate of metachronous CRC in dMMR subgroup was 12.8 and 87.2% while 1.9 and 98.1% in the pMMR subgroup. Survival outcomes were significantly affected by MMR status and resection types by multivariate analysis. Significantly better OS in dMMR subgroup (HR = 0.479, 95% CI: 0.257-0.894, p = 0.021) comparing with pMMR subgroup was observed. However, significant improved DFS (HR = 0.367, 95% CI: 0.172-.0787, p = 0.010) but not significant for OS (HR = 0.510, 95% CI: 0.219-1.150, p = 0.103) for EC subgroup compared with SC subgroup. Differences existing among different subgroups by combing extent of resection and MMR status. In dMMR subgroup, SC, compared with EC, demonstrated significantly worse DFS by multivariate analyses (HR = 3.526, 95% CI: 1.346-9.236, p = 0.010) but not for OS (HR = 2.387, 95% CI: 0.788-7.229, p = 0.124), however, no significantly differences of OS and DFS in pMMR subgroup between SC and EC were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly better overall survival and higher rate of metachronous CRC exist in dMMR subgroup of HNPCC patients comparing with pMMR subgroup. Extended colectomy significantly improved DFS and was thus recommended for dMMR subgroup but not pMMR subgroup of HNPCC patients.

Assessing Effectiveness of Colonic and Gynecological Risk Reducing Surgery in Lynch Syndrome Individuals

BACKGROUND

Colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) are the most common types of cancer in Lynch syndrome (LS). Risk reducing surgeries (RRS) might impact cancer incidence and mortality. Our objectives were to evaluate cumulative incidences of CRC, gynecological cancer and all-cause mortality after RRS in LS individuals.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 976 LS carriers from a single-institution registry. Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence at 75 years of cancer (metachronous CRC in 425 individuals; EC and ovarian cancer (OC) in 531 individuals) and all-cause mortality cumulative incidence, comparing extended (ES) vs. segmental surgery (SS) in the CRC cohort and risk reducing gynecological surgery (RRGS) vs. surveillance in the gynecological cohort.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence at 75 years of metachronous CRC was 12.5% vs. 44.7% (p = 0.04) and all-cause mortality cumulative incidence was 38.6% vs. 55.3% (p = 0.31), for ES and SS, respectively. Cumulative, incidence at 75 years was 11.2% vs. 46.3% for EC (p = 0.001) and 0% vs. 12.7% for OC (p N/A) and all-cause mortality cumulative incidence was 0% vs. 52.7% (p N/A), for RRGS vs. surveillance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RRS in LS reduces the incidence of metachronous CRC and gynecological neoplasms, also indicating a reduction in all-cause mortality cumulative incidence in females undergoing RRGS.

Changes to gastrointestinal function after surgery for colorectal cancer

Bowel function is increasingly considered as an important outcome for patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Increasing technical skills and technological advances have meant fewer patients require a long-term stoma but this comes at the cost, often, of poor function. With a larger range of treatment options available for a given cancer, both function and oncology should be considered in parallel when counselling patients before surgery. In the perioperative phase, bowel function can be improved with minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, with limited evidence for targeted medical therapies. Early detection and sound management of surgical complications such as anastomotic leak and stricture can mitigate their adverse effects on bowel function. Long-term gastrointestinal dysfunction manifests as diarrhoea and low anterior resection syndrome for colon and rectal cancer respectively. Multi-modal strategies for low anterior resection syndrome are emerging to improve significantly quality of life after restorative rectal cancer surgery.

Prophylactic Gynecologic Surgery at Time of Colectomy Benefits Women with Lynch Syndrome and Colon Cancer: A Markov Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Women with Lynch syndrome who have completed childbearing should be offered prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for gynecologic cancer prevention. The benefit of prophylactic gynecologic surgery at the time of colon cancer resection is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the cost, quality of life, and likelihood of being alive and free from colon, endometrial, and ovarian cancer between operative choices for patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing surgery for colon cancer.

DESIGN

A Markov decision tree spanning 40 years was constructed for a hypothetical cohort of 30-year-old women with Lynch syndrome who had been diagnosed with colon cancer. Outcomes of 6 surgical strategies were compared, including segmental or total abdominal colectomy with or without hysterectomy alone or combined with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

SETTINGS

A Markov cost-effectiveness analysis was performed at a single center.

PATIENTS

A literature search was performed identifying studies of patients with genetically diagnosed Lynch syndrome that described cost, risk of mortality, and quality of life after colon cancer resection and prophylactic gynecologic surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were quality-adjusted life-years and the likelihood of being alive and free from colon, endometrial, and ovarian cancer 40 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Women with Lynch syndrome who underwent a total abdominal colectomy and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had the highest likelihood of being alive and cancer free. Total abdominal colectomy with hysterectomy was a close second, but yielded the largest amount of quality-adjusted life-years and lowest cost.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by the statistical method and quality of studies used.

CONCLUSIONS

Total abdominal colectomy with prophylactic hysterectomy at 30 years of age was the most cost-effective surgical choice in women with Lynch syndrome and colon cancer. The addition of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy offered the highest event-free survival and lowest mortality. However, the additional morbidity of premature menopause of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy for younger women outweighed the benefit of ovarian cancer prevention. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B287. LA CIRUGÍA GINECOLÓGICA PROFILÁCTICA EN EL MOMENTO DE LA COLECTOMÍA BENEFICIA A LAS MUJERES CON SÍNDROME DE LYNCH Y CÁNCER DE COLON: UN ANÁLISIS DE COSTO-EFECTIVIDAD DE MARKOV: Las mujeres con síndrome de Lynch que han completado la maternidad deberían recibir histerectomía profiláctica y salpingooforectomía bilateral para la prevención del cáncer ginecológico. El beneficio de la cirugía ginecológica profiláctica en el momento de la resección del cáncer de colon no está claro.Comparar el costo, la calidad de vida y la probabilidad de estar viva y libre de cáncer de colon, endometrio y ovario entre las opciones quirúrgicas para pacientes con síndrome de Lynch sometidos a cirugía por cáncer de colon.Se construyó un árbol de decisión de Markov que abarca cuarenta años para una cohorte hipotética de mujeres de 30 años con síndrome de Lynch diagnosticadas con cáncer de colon. Se compararon los resultados de seis estrategias quirúrgicas, incluida la colectomía abdominal segmentaria o total con o sin histerectomía sola o combinada con salpingooforectomía bilateral.Se realizó un análisis de costo-efectividad de Markov en un solo centro.se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica para identificar estudios de pacientes con síndrome de Lynch con diagnóstico genético que describieron el costo, el riesgo de mortalidad y la calidad de vida después de la resección del cáncer de colon y la cirugía ginecológica profiláctica.años de vida ajustados por calidad y probabilidad de estar vivo y libre de cáncer de colon, endometrio y ovario 40 años después de la cirugía.Las mujeres con síndrome de Lynch que se sometieron a una colectomía e histerectomía abdominal total con salpingooforectomía bilateral tuvieron la mayor probabilidad de estar vivas y libres de cáncer. La colectomía abdominal total con histerectomía fue un segundo lugar cercano, pero produjo la mayor cantidad de años de vida ajustados por calidad y el costo más bajo.Este estudio está limitado por el método estadístico y la calidad de los estudios utilizados.La colectomía abdominal total con histerectomía profiláctica a los 30 años fue la opción quirúrgica más rentable en mujeres con síndrome de Lynch y cáncer de colon. La adición de salpingooforectomía bilateral ofreció la mayor supervivencia libre de eventos y la menor mortalidad. Sin embargo, la morbilidad adicional de la menopausia prematura de la salpingooforectomía profiláctica para las mujeres más jóvenes superó el beneficio de la prevención del cáncer de ovario. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B287. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Different surgical outcome and follow-up status between dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancer patients who fulfilled with Amsterdam-II criteria

Background

Although hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) could be subtyped into proficient or deficient mismatch repair gene expression (pMMR or dMMR), distinct clinical features between these two subgroups patients were rarely reported.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 175 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients between January 1995 and December 2012. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the differences between two subgroups.

Results

Significant differences of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) exist between dMMR and pMMR. In addition to other factors including younger mean age of diagnosis for dMMR patients (48.6 years vs. 54.3 years), operation type (more extended colectomy for dMMR 35.8% vs. 14.5%), tumor location (right colon predominance for dMMR 61.7% vs. 27.3% and more rectum cases for pMMR 41.8% vs. 11.7%), tumor differentiation (more poor differentiation for dMMR 23.3% vs. 9.0%), N staging (more N0 cases for dMMR 70.8% vs. 50.9%), more frequently presence of extra-colonic tumors for dMMR (16.7% vs.1.8%), and lower recurrence rates (9.1% vs.35.3%). Significantly different cumulative incidences of developing metachronous colorectal cancer were observed with 6.18 for pMMR patients and 20.57 person-years for dMMR patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Distinct clinicopathological features significantly exist between dMMR and pMMR subtypes patient, MMR status should be consider to tailor operation types and follow up surveillance between these two subgroups patients who all fulfilled with Amsterdam-II criteria.

Adequacy evaluation of the annual colonoscopic surveillance and individual difference of disease phenotypes in Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

Regular endoscopic surveillance for Lynch syndrome is reported to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC)-related mortality. However, the appropriate surveillance intervals are still unclear. We evaluated the adequacy of annual colonoscopy and investigated the differences in tumor occurrence rates between individual patients.

METHODS

In total, 25 patients with Lynch syndrome who underwent colonoscopic surveillance between 2007 and 2016 at the Iwakuni Clinical Center were included. We retrospectively investigated the surveillance frequency and the clinical features associated with tumor development.

RESULTS

Colonoscopic surveillance was performed every 397 days on average. A total of 101 tumors, including 8 intramucosal carcinomas and 15 carcinomas, were observed within the study period. Annual colonoscopy detected six malignancies, including a carcinoma requiring surgery. Tumor incidence was associated with tumor existence in the initial colonoscopies (P = 0.018). Patients with a tumor occurrence rate of 0.4 tumors per year during our observation period were significantly more likely to have malignancies detected during regular surveillance than patients who had a lower occurrence rate (P < 0.001). Malignancy occurrence rate was strongly associated with tumor occurrence rate (P < 0.001, R2 = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Annual colonoscopic surveillance for Lynch syndrome patients was effective in reducing the risk of CRC progression, but was insufficient to completely avoid surgery. Because the tumor occurrence rate differed substantially between individuals, more intensive surveillance was required for high-risk patients.

Analysis of morbidity and mortality, quality of life and bowel function after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis versus right and left hemicolectomy: A study to optimise the treatment of lynch syndrome and attenuated polyposis coli

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical treatment for colonic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) in Lynch Syndrome (LS) and attenuated polyposis coli (A-FAP phenotype) patients is still debated, since there is a high risk of metachronous colonic adenomas and carcinoma after primary surgery. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcome, functional data, and Quality of Life (QoL) after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) compared to right (RH) or left hemicolectomy/sigmoidectomy (LH/SI).

METHODS

Patients who underwent TC-IRA (ileorectal anastomosis from 8 to 15 cm from the anal verge) for CRC and/or polyposis at our Surgical Department between 2001 and 2017 were included in the study group, and were matched one-to-one by baseline and clinical characteristics with a control group of RH and LH/SI. Morbidity and mortality data were collected (Clavien-Dindo classification). International validated questionnaires were used to investigate QoL and bowel function.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled in each group. No differences were found on length of hospital stay, Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications and mortality (p > 0.05). TC-IRA showed a longer operative time than RH and LH/SI (p < 0.0001) and a major blood loss than RH (p < 0.0001). Worse bowel function and worse QoL, only for the bowel-related items, were recorded in TC-IRA group. The general QoL was similar among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TC-IRA and segmental resection have similar morbidity and mortality. The worse bowel function in TC-IRA group does not impact on the general QoL. These data can be useful in the setting of risk-reducing surgery decision in LS and A-FAP patients.

Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients: a registry-based observational mono-institutional study cohort

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Lynch Syndrome (LS) patients are essential for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment strategy to perform not only a curative but also preventive surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for mCRC development in LS patients to define the patient subset that may benefit an extended curative and preventive surgical resection.

METHODS

Patient's clinical history, oncological, molecular and follow-up were collected retrospectively from the Hereditary Digestive Tumors Registry at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. The age-related cumulative risk of mCRC was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors significantly associated with mCRC were analyzed with a Cox regression model. Overall and specific competitive risks were also calculated.

RESULTS

In a total of 1346 CRC patients, 159 (11.8%) developed a mCRC after a mean follow-up of 138 months from the primary tumor. The independent risk factors reported by a multivariate analysis were: pathogenetic variants in MLH1 and MSH2 (HR 2.96 and 1.91, respectively) and history of colorectal adenomas (HR 1.54); whereas female sex and extended surgery were protective (HR 0.59 and 0.79, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among a high-risk population for CRC, in particular LS, an extended surgery may be considered in CRC patients with specific risk factors (MLH1 or MSH2 germline pathogenic variants, history of colorectal adenomas) to reduce the risk of mCRC development.

Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG)

Heritable factors account for approximately 35% of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, and almost 30% of the population in the UK have a family history of CRC. The quantification of an individual's lifetime risk of gastrointestinal cancer may incorporate clinical and molecular data, and depends on accurate phenotypic assessment and genetic diagnosis. In turn this may facilitate targeted risk-reducing interventions, including endoscopic surveillance, preventative surgery and chemoprophylaxis, which provide opportunities for cancer prevention. This guideline is an update from the 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (BSG/ACPGBI) guidelines for colorectal screening and surveillance in moderate and high-risk groups; however, this guideline is concerned specifically with people who have increased lifetime risk of CRC due to hereditary factors, including those with Lynch syndrome, polyposis or a family history of CRC. On this occasion we invited the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), a subgroup within the British Society of Genetic Medicine (BSGM), as a partner to BSG and ACPGBI in the multidisciplinary guideline development process. We also invited external review through the Delphi process by members of the public as well as the steering committees of the European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A systematic review of 10 189 publications was undertaken to develop 67 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the management of hereditary CRC risk. Ten research recommendations are also prioritised to inform clinical management of people at hereditary CRC risk.

Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasm after a Segmental Colectomy in Lynch Syndrome Patients According to Mismatch Repair Gene Status

BACKGROUND

Because of increased risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC), all patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) are offered a total colectomy. However, because metachronous CRC rate by mismatch repair (MMR) gene is uncertain, and total colectomy negatively impacts quality of life, it remains unclear whether segmental resection is indicated for lower penetrance MMR genes. We evaluated metachronous CRC incidence according to MMR gene in LS patients who underwent a segmental colectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort study in patients with an earlier colectomy for CRC and an MMR germline mutation in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 followed prospectively in a hereditary CRC family registry. All patients underwent surveillance colonoscopy. Metachronous CRC was defined as one detected more than 1 year after index resection. Primary end point was cumulative incidence of metachronous CRC overall and by MMR gene.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients were included: 35 with MLH1 likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variants (32%), 42 MSH2 (38%), 20 MSH6 (18%), and 13 PMS2 (12%). Median follow-up 4.26 years (range 0.53 to 19.92 years). Overall, metachronous CRC developed in 22 patients (20%). At 10-year follow-up, incidence was 12% (95% CI 6% to 23%), with no metachronous CRC detected in patients with a PMS2 or MSH6 LP/P variant.

CONCLUSIONS

After index segmental resection, metachronous CRC is less likely to develop in LS patients with MSH6 or PMS2 LP/P variant than in MLH1 or MSH2 carriers. Our data support segmental resection and long-term colonoscopic surveillance rather than total colectomy in carefully selected, well-informed LS patients with MSH6 or PMS2 LP/P variant.

Prophylactic Surgery and Extended Oncologic Radicality in Gastric and Colorectal Hereditary Cancer Syndromes

Prophylactic surgery for high-penetrance hereditary gastric and colorectal cancer can be a primary prophylaxis of cancer and a secondary oncologic prevention. As early cancer is often detected in the resected organ, there has been no prophylaxis of cancer but cancer treatment. Extended oncological radicality with removal of the complete organ is a tertiary prevention as metachronous cancer is avoided. The indication for prophylactic surgery or extended oncological radicality is presented regarding hereditary and familial gastric and colorectal cancer. Hereditary diffuse type gastric cancer (E-cadherin mutation) and familial adenomatous polyposis coli (APC or MYH mutation) are well-accepted indications for prophylactic surgery with a variety of considerations regarding phenotype, genotype, associated diseases, age, timing, extent, and technique of surgery. Not so much prophylactic surgery as extended oncologic radicality can be considered in familial gastric and colorectal cancer as well as Lynch or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC). Clinical, molecular, and technical progress leads to less invasive and risk-adapted surgical and nonsurgical interventions, expanding the variety of individualized treatment options.

Management of genetically determined colorectal cancer

Surgeons are increasingly treating patients for colorectal cancer who are known to have a genetic predisposition to develop the disease; this may modify the surgical and oncological management of the patient. In this review the approach to the patient with colorectal cancer on a background of Lynch syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis is explored.

Total abdominal colectomy is cost-effective in treating colorectal cancer in patients with genetically diagnosed Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) has a 80% lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer and metachronous cancer. No studies have examined the quality adjusted life expectancy after SEG or TAC for LS patients, which this study was aiming for. If TAC offers a higher quality adjusted life year (QALY) to SEG in LS patients, preoperative diagnosis of LS is critical as it alters the recommended surgical procedure.

METHODS

A Markov decision tree was constructed using Treeage software to compare QALY of LS patients following SEG or TAC. Probabilities, cost, and utility were obtained from literature. Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed.

RESULTS

TAC dominates SEG as both the life-saving and cost-saving strategy. TAC dominated SEG on QALY (17.80 vs 17.13 QALY) for a cohort of LS patients diagnosed at an average of 30 year old and followed every 2 years after initial surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that TAC as the primary surgical option for LS patients diagnosed with Stage I-III colon cancer is cost-effective. Further cost-effectiveness study is recommended to include extra-colonic malignancies in LS patients.

Barriers to Lynch Syndrome Testing and Preoperative Result Availability in Early-onset Colorectal Cancer: A National Physician Survey Study

Objective

Although widely recommended, Lynch syndrome (LS) testing with tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) is infrequently performed in early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), and CRC generally. Reasons are poorly understood. Hence, we conducted a national survey focusing on gastroenterologists, as they are frequently first to diagnose CRC, assessing testing barriers and which specialist is felt responsible for ordering MSI/IHC. Additionally, we assessed factors influencing timing of MSI/IHC ordering; testing on colonoscopy biopsy, opposed to post-operative surgical specimens, assists decisions on preoperative germline genetic testing and extent of colonic resection (ECR).

Methods

A 21-question web-based survey was distributed through an American College of Gastroenterology email listing.

Results

In total 509 completed the survey. 442 confirmed gastroenterologists were analyzed. Only 33.4% felt gastroenterologists were responsible for MSI/IHC ordering; pathologists were believed most responsible (38.6%). Cost, unfamiliarity interpreting results and unavailable genetic counseling most commonly prevented routine ordering (33.3%, 29.2%, 24.9%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, non-academic and rural settings were associated with cost and genetic counseling barriers. Only 46.1% felt MSI/IHC should always be performed on colonoscopy biopsy. Guideline familiarity predicted whether respondents felt surgical resection should be delayed until results returned given potential effect on ECR decisions.

Conclusion

Inconsistencies in who is felt should order MSI/IHC may lead to diffusion of responsibility, preventing consistent testing, including preoperatively. Assuring institutional universal testing protocols are in place, with focus on timing of testing, can optimize care. Strategies addressing cost barriers and genomic service availability in rural and non-academic settings can enhance testing. Greater emphasis on guideline familiarity is required.

Efficacy, functional outcome and post-operative complications of total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis vs. segmental colectomy in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

The primary objective of the present study was to compare the choice of colectomy, i.e. total vs. segmental colectomy, in cases of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC/lynch syndrome), and to assess the efficacy, oncological safety, functional outcome and post-operative complications of total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis vs. segmental colectomy in HNPCC. A total of 289 patients who fulfilled the Amsterdam I and II criteria for HNPCC were included in the present study. The criteria for confirmation of the diagnosis were five micro-satellite markers, namely BAT25, BAT26, D2s123, d5S346 and D17S250. Group 1 included those patients who received their diagnosis in the years 2011–2013 and those in group 2 had been diagnosed in the years 2014–2016. The cohort had been subjected to two different types of surgery: i) Standard and extended surgery including total colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and subtotal colectomy and ii) segmental resection of the colon. Analysis of patient data indicated that in group 1, the extended resection was performed more frequently than in group 2 (68 vs. 34% of cases) and accordingly, segmental resection was less frequent (32 vs. 66%; P<0.001). In conclusion, the extensive rather than the segmental resection has been commonly performed several years ago, but at present, the surgical method of choice in cases of lynch syndrome is segmental resection. Trial registry no. QU/MR2011/CRC5, dated 21 March 2011.

Metachronous colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome patients-should the endoscopic surveillance be more intensive?

PURPOSE

Regular follow-up for patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is vital due to the increased risk of colorectal (50-80%), endometrial (40-60%), and other cancers. However, there is an ongoing debate concerning the best interval between colonoscopies. Currently, no specific endoscopic follow-up has been decided for LS patients who already have an index colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of metachronous cancers (MC) after primary CRC in a LS population and to determinate if endoscopic surveillance should be more intensive.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of hereditary CRC since 2009 was included. Patients with LS and a primary CRC were the cohort of choice.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one patients were included with a median age of 44 years(16-70). At least one MC occurred in 39 patients (32.2%), with a median interval of 67 months (6-300) from index cancer. Fifteen (38.5%) developed two or more MCs during follow-up, with a median number of two (2-6) tumors occurring. Metachronous CRC were diagnosed after a median interval of 24 (6-57) months since last colonoscopy and were more commonly seen in MSH2 mutation carriers (58 vs. 35%, p = 0.001). After a median follow-up of 52.9 (3-72) months, no cancer-related deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LS have an increased risk of MC, especially CRCs. With a median time period of 24 months between colonoscopy and metachronous CRC, the interval between surveillance colonoscopies following primary CRC should not exceed 18 months, especially in patients with MSH2 mutation.

Chronic diarrhoea following surgery for colon cancer-frequency, causes and treatment options

PURPOSE

The growing population of survivors after colon cancer warrants increased attention to the long-term outcome of surgical treatment. The change in bowel anatomy after resection disrupts normal gastrointestinal function and may cause symptoms. Thus, many patients surviving colon cancer have to cope with bowel dysfunction for the rest of their lives. We here aim to provide an overview of the literature on this topic.

METHODS

We review long-term functional outcomes of surgical treatment for colon cancer, the underlying pathology, and treatment options.

RESULTS

Common symptoms include constipation, urge for defecation and diarrhoea. Causes of diarrhoea after colon cancer surgery are sparsely studied, but they probably include bile acid malabsorption, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and disruption of the ileal brake. Specific diagnosis should be made to allow individual treatment based on the underlying pathology. Studies on treatment of functional problems after surgery for colon cancer are extremely few, but some lessons can be drawn from the treatment of other patient groups having undergone colon surgery.

CONCLUSION

Diarrhoea is likely a common long-term complication after colon cancer surgery. Attention to this complication and a specific diagnosis will aid the targeted treatment of patients suffering from this complication.

Recent progress in Lynch syndrome and other familial colorectal cancer syndromes

The current understanding of familial colorectal cancer was limited to descriptions of affected pedigrees until the early 1990s. A series of landscape-altering discoveries revealed that there were distinct forms of familial cancer, and most were related to genes previously not known to be involved in human disease. This review largely focuses on advances in our understanding of Lynch syndrome because of the unique relationship of this disease to defective DNA mismatch repair and the clinical implications this has for diagnostics, prevention, and therapy. Recent advances have occurred in our understanding of the epidemiology of this disease, and the advent of broad genetic panels has altered the approach to germline and somatic diagnoses for all of the familial colorectal cancer syndromes. Important advances have been made toward a more complete mechanistic understanding of the pathogenesis of neoplasia in the setting of Lynch syndrome, and these advances have important implications for prevention. Finally, paradigm-shifting approaches to treatment of Lynch-syndrome and related tumors have occurred through the development of immune checkpoint therapies for hypermutated cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:217-231. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Integrating surgery and genetic testing for the modern surgeon

The field of cancer genetics is rapidly evolving and several genetic mutations have been identified in hereditary cancer syndromes. These mutations can be diagnosed via routine genetic testing allowing prompt intervention. This is especially true for certain variants of colorectal, breast, and thyroid cancers where genetic testing may guide surgical therapy. Ultimately, surgical intervention may drastically diminish disease manifestation or progression in individuals deemed as high-risk based on their genetic makeup. Understanding the concepts of gene-based testing and integrating into current surgical practice is crucial. This review addresses common genetic syndromes, tests, and interventions salient to the current surgeon.

Efficacy of proximal colectomy for surgical management of right-sided first colorectal cancer in Lynch Syndrome mutation carriers

BACKGROUND

This study analyzes the occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) mutation carriers, interval until diagnosis of metachronous CRC, and survival after proximal colectomy (PC) compared with total (TC) and subtotal colectomy (STC) for right-sided first CRC in LS mutation carriers.

METHODS

Sixty-four LS mutation carriers with right-sided first CRC treated with PC or TC + STC were confirmed by clinical records. Bivariate analyses were examined for significance and life tables were generated for risk of metachronous CRC and survival estimates following surgery.

RESULTS

One of 16 (6.3%) mutation carriers treated with TC + STC developed subsequent CRC compared with 13/48 (27%) treated by PC. There was no significant difference in survival estimates between PC compared with TC + STC through 25 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Risk of subsequent CRC and survival estimates following PC and TC + STC should be considered in surgical management of right-sided first CRC in LS mutation carriers.

Colorectal surveillance after segmental resection for young-onset colorectal cancer: is there evidence for extended resection?

AIM

Although sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) usually occurs in patients aged over 50, recent evidence suggests that the incidence is increasing in younger patients. Such patients are theoretically at high risk of metachronous neoplasia and may be candidates for extended prophylactic colectomy. This study aimed to define the risk of metachronous cancer/adenomas during follow-up of younger patients who underwent segmental colectomy for CRC.

METHOD

A CRC database was used to identify patients aged under 50 who underwent surgery for CRC between 1994 and 2010. Patients diagnosed with hereditary cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. The primary end-points were frequency of extended resection and the rates of metachronous cancer and high-risk adenomas during follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 284 young patients with a resectable primary tumour, of whom 280 (98.6%) underwent segmental resection, 3 (1%) extended resection and 1 (0.4%) local resection. Endoscopic follow-up was available for 150 of the patients who had segmental colectomy, with a mean age of 42.6 (±5.8) years at diagnosis and median follow-up time of 68 months (interquartile range 45-105). Out of these 150 patients, 4 (2.7%) developed metachronous colonic adenocarcinoma at 24, 71, 151 and 228 months after index surgery. Thirty additional patients had at least one adenoma identified during surveillance, and three had sessile serrated polyps. Out of the three patients undergoing extended resection, none had metachronous cancer or advanced adenomas at an average follow-up of 17 years.

CONCLUSION

A segmental colectomy or proctectomy is adequate treatment for patients presenting with CRC under the age of 50.

The Experience of Extended Bowel Resection in Individuals With a High Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To ascertain individual experiences of extended bowel resection as treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) in those with a high metachronous CRC risk, including the self-reported adequacy of information received at different time points of treatment and recovery.
.

RESEARCH APPROACH

Qualitative.
.

SETTING

Participants were recruited through the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry and two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia.
.

PARTICIPANTS

18 individuals with a high metachronous CRC risk who had an extended bowel resection from 6-12 months ago.
.

METHODOLOGIC APPROACH

Semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed thematically.
.

FINDINGS

In most cases, the treating surgeon decided on the best option regarding surgical treatment. Participants felt well informed about the surgical procedure. Information related to surgical outcomes, recovery, and lifestyle adjustment from surgery was not always adequate. Many participants described ongoing worry about developing another cancer. 
.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing an extended resection to reduce metachronous CRC risk require detailed information delivered at more than one time point and relating to several different aspects of the surgical procedure and its outcomes.
.

INTERPRETATION

An increased emphasis should be given to the provision of patient information on surgical outcomes, recovery, and lifestyle adjustment. Colorectal nurses could provide support for some of the reported unmet needs.

Feasibility of Segmental Colectomy Followed by Endoscopic Surveillance as a Treatment Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Initial surgical procedures for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with Lynch syndrome remain controversial. This study assessed the validity of segmental colectomy (SGC) followed by endoscopic surveillance as a treatment strategy for CRC patients with Lynch syndrome.

METHODS

Among consecutive patients who underwent surgery for primary CRC between April 1985 and December 2014, 49 patients were observed to have germline mutations in a mismatch repair gene, and 38 patients who underwent SGC followed by periodic endoscopic surveillance at our institution were evaluated for metachronous CRC, need for secondary surgery, and the details of endoscopic surveillance.

RESULTS

Of the 38 patients who underwent SGC followed by periodic endoscopic surveillance at our institution, 6 (15.8%) patients showed metachronous CRC, 3 (7.9%) patients underwent endoscopic resection, and the other 3 patients (7.9%) underwent secondary surgery. The dispersion of the endoscopic surveillance interval was significantly greater in patients with metachronous CRC (364 ± 332.9 days) than in those without metachronous CRC (370 ± 129.7 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SGC followed by annual endoscopic surveillance was feasible as a treatment strategy for CRC patients with Lynch syndrome, because the incidence of metachronous CRC and the need for secondary surgery were low. Annual and periodic endoscopic surveillance might be essential for early detection of metachronous CRC and prevention of secondary surgery because of metachronous CRC in CRC patients with Lynch syndrome after SGC.

Subtotal Colectomy for Colon Cancer Reduces the Need for Subsequent Surgery in Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer is high after surgical resection for first colon cancer in Lynch syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine whether extended surgery decreases the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer and improves long-term survival.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTING

Data were collected from a nationwide registry.

PATIENTS

Two hundred forty-two Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant carriers who underwent surgery for a first colon cancer from 1984 to 2009 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent standard segmental colectomy (n = 144) or extended colectomy (n = 98) for colon cancer. Patients were followed a median of 14.6 up to 25 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk of subsequent colorectal cancer in either group, overall and disease-specific survival, and operative mortality were the primary outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Subtotal colectomy decreased the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.52; p = 0.001), compared with segmental resection. Subsequent colorectal cancer decreased in MLH1 carriers. The MSH2 carriers showed no statistical difference, possibly because of their small number. Disease-specific and overall survival within 25 years did not differ between the standard and extended surgeries (82.7% vs 87.2%, p = 0.76 and 47.2% vs 41.4%, p = 0.83). The cumulative risk of subsequent colorectal cancer was 20% in 10 years and 47% within 25 years after standard resection and 4% and 9% after extended surgery. The cumulative risk of metachronous colorectal cancer was 7% within 25 years after subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoidal anastomosis. One patient died of postoperative septicemia within 30 days after segmental colectomy.

LIMITATIONS

Data on surgical procedures were primarily collected retrospectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant carriers may undergo subtotal colectomy to manage first colon cancer and avoid repetitive abdominal surgery and to reduce the remaining bowel to facilitate easier endoscopic surveillance. It provides no survival benefit, compared with segmental colon resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A319.

Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer following colectomy in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for 2-4% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and is associated with an increased risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer (mCRC). The role of extended colectomy in LS CRC is controversial. There are limited studies comparing the risk of mCRC following segmental colectomy and extended colectomy. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the risk of developing mCRC following segmental and extended colectomy for LS CRC and endoscopic compliance.

METHOD

A systematic review of major databases was performed using predefined terms. All original articles published in English comparing the risk of mCRC in LS patients after segmental and extended colectomy from 1950 to January 2016 were included.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 324 studies. Six studies involving 871 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 705 (80.9%) underwent segmental colectomy and 166 (19.1%) extended colectomy. Average follow-up was 91.2 months. The mCRC rate was 22.8% and 6% in the segmental and extended colectomy groups, respectively. The segmental group were over four times more likely to develop mCRC (OR 4.02, 95% CI: 2.01-8.04, P < 0.0001). mCRC occurred in patients after segmental colectomy despite 1-2-yearly postoperative endoscopic surveillance.

CONCLUSION

This result suggests that extended colectomy reduces the risk of mCRC by over four-fold compared with segmental colectomy. mCRC occurred in the segmental group despite postoperative endoscopic surveillance. This needs to be borne in mind when deciding on the appropriate surgical management of LS patients with CRC. We recommend that extended colectomy should be considered for patients with confirmed LS CRC.

Mucoadhesive Chitosan-Pectinate Nanoparticles for the Delivery of Curcumin to the Colon

In the present study, we report the properties of a mucoadhesive chitosan-pectinate nanoparticulate formulation able to retain its integrity in the milieu of the upper gastrointestinal tract and subsequently, mucoadhere and release curcumin in colon conditions. Using this system, we aimed to deliver curcumin to the colon for the possible management of colorectal cancer. The delivery system comprised of a chitosan-pectinate composite nanopolymeric with a z-average of 206.0 nm (±6.6 nm) and zeta potential of +32.8 mV (±0.5 mV) and encapsulation efficiency of 64%. The nanoparticles mucoadhesiveness was higher at alkaline pH compared to acidic pH. Furthermore, more than 80% release of curcumin was achieved in pectinase-enriched medium (pH 6.4) as opposed to negligible release in acidic and enzyme-restricted media at pH 6.8. SEM images of the nanoparticles after exposure to the various media indicate a retained matrix in acid media as opposed to a distorted/fragmented matrix in pectinase-enriched medium. The data strongly indicates that the system has the potential to be applied as a colon-targeted mucoadhesive curcumin delivery system for the possible treatment of colon cancer.

Clinicopathological features and surgical options for synchronous colorectal cancer

This study was conducted to investigate the clinicopathological features of synchronous cancers and treatment options according to their locations.Records of 8368 patients with colorectal cancer treated at our center between July 2003 and December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. All synchronous colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment were included.Synchronous cancers were identified in 217 patients (2.6%). Seventy-nine patients underwent either total colectomy, subtotal colectomy, or total proctocolectomy; 116 underwent 1 regional resection, including local excision; and 22 underwent 2 regional resections. The mean age was 62 years, slightly higher than that for the single-cancer patients. Synchronous cancers were more common in male patients, more frequently located in the left colon, had more microsatellite instability-high status, and showed more advanced stage than single cancer. Extensive resection was mainly performed for synchronous cancers located in both the right and left colon. Two regional resections were performed for cancers in the right colon and rectum. There were no differences in complication rates or the occurrence of metachronous cancer between the 2-region resection and extensive resection groups. Eight years postoperatively, the mean number of daily bowel movements for these 2 groups were 1.9 and 4.3, respectively.We found that synchronous cancer was different from single cancer in terms of age, gender, location, and pathologic features. Synchronous colorectal cancer requires different treatment strategy according to the distribution of lesions. Comparison between the 2 regional resections and extensive resection approaches suggests that 2 regional resections are preferable.

Approach to Lynch Syndrome for the Gastroenterologist

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal-dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Mutations in mismatch repair genes, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, are implicated in the pathogenesis of the syndrome through microsatellite instability (MSI) and a rapid adenoma-carcinoma sequence. The primary methodologies for diagnosis include clinical criteria (Amsterdam I/II, Revised Bethesda Guidelines), computational models, and genetic testing (MSI, immunohistochemistry, germline testing). Universal genetic testing of colorectal cancers has gained popularity as a method to identify high-risk individuals and to offer appropriate cancer surveillance, psychological reassurance, and family planning. Management includes short-interval surveillance with colonoscopy in those without colorectal cancer and colectomy for those with cancer. Long-term chemoprevention with aspirin may improve mortality.

Survival Outcome and Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Cancer After Surgery in Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of extensive colectomy is controversial in Lynch syndrome, and risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) after segmental colectomy are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the survival outcome and risk of metachronous CRC after surgery in Lynch syndrome patients diagnosed with their first CRC.

METHODS

Overall, 106 patients with Lynch syndrome who underwent surgery for CRC were included in the study. The demographics, genotype, clinicopathological characteristics of the index CRC, and follow-up data were reviewed from a single-institution Lynch syndrome database.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients who underwent extensive surgery, no metachronous CRC was developed during a mean follow-up of 68.1 months. Of 76 patients who underwent segmental colectomy, 13 (17.1 %) developed metachronous CRC during a mean follow-up of 77.2 months. The cumulative risk of metachronous CRC was 8.4 % at 5 years and 20.4 % at 10 years after segmental colectomy. No difference in overall and CRC-specific survival was observed between segmental colectomy and extensive colectomy (p = 0.277 and p = 0.659, respectively). A 25 cm or longer resection of bowel decreased the risk of metachronous CRC after segmental colectomy compared with less extensive resection (hazard ratio 0.10, 95 % confidence interval 0.01-0.86). Annual surveillance colonoscopy did not decrease the risk of metachronous CRC compared with less frequent surveillance colonoscopy. Although not statistically significant, none of the MSH6 gene mutation carriers were diagnosed with metachronous CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no survival benefit was identified, surgeons and patients might consider extensive colectomy to prevent metachronous CRC in Lynch syndrome patients regardless of their clinicopathological characteristics.