Corl KA, Levy MM, Holder AL, Douglas IS, Linde-Zwirble WT, Alam A. Moderate IV Fluid Resuscitation Is Associated With Decreased Sepsis Mortality.
Crit Care Med 2024;
52:e557-e567. [PMID:
39177437 PMCID:
PMC11469629 DOI:
10.1097/ccm.0000000000006394]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Significant practice variation exists in the amount of resuscitative IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. Current research suggests equipoise between a tightly restrictive or more liberal strategy but data is lacking on a wider range of resuscitation practices. We sought to examine the relationship between a wide range of fluid resuscitation practices and sepsis mortality and then identify the primary driver of this practice variation.
DESIGN
Retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database.
SETTING
Six hundred twelve U.S. hospitals.
PATIENTS
Patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the ICU from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019.
INTERVENTIONS
The volume of resuscitative IV fluid administered before the end of hospital day- 1 and mortality.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
In total, 190,682 patients with sepsis and septic shock were included in the analysis. Based upon patient characteristics and illness severity, we predicted that physicians should prescribe patients with sepsis a narrow mean range of IV fluid (95% range, 3.6-4.5 L). Instead, we observed wide variation in the mean IV fluids administered (95% range, 1.7-7.4 L). After splitting the patients into five groups based upon attending physician practice, we observed patients in the moderate group (4.0 L; interquartile range [IQR], 2.4-5.1 L) experienced a 2.5% reduction in risk-adjusted mortality compared with either the very low (1.6 L; IQR, 1.0-2.5 L) or very high (6.1 L; IQR, 4.0-9.0 L) fluid groups p < 0.01). An analysis of within- and between-hospital IV fluid resuscitation practices showed that physician variation within hospitals instead of practice differences between hospitals accounts for the observed variation.
CONCLUSIONS
Individual physician practice drives excess variation in the amount of IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. A moderate approach to IV fluid resuscitation is associated with decreased sepsis mortality and should be tested in future randomized controlled trials.
Collapse