European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access):

The SaRePo protocol: A seven-step strategy to minimize complications potentially related to the removal of totally implanted central venous access devices

Removal of totally implanted central venous access devices (brachial ports, chest-ports, femoral ports) is potentially associated with the risk of untoward events, some of them negligible (prolonged maneuver time due to technical difficulties), some relevant (hematoma), and some severe (embolization of catheter fragments into the circulation). The removal technique suitable for minimizing such complications has been described only in few manuals, but it has never been standardized. This paper describes a standardized protocol (SaRePo: Safe Removal of Ports) which consists of seven basic strategies to be adopted systematically during removal of totally implanted venous access devices, so to minimize the risk of adverse events. These strategies include: evaluation of the patient's history, preprocedural ultrasound scan of the veins, appropriate aseptic technique, proper local anesthesia, catheter extraction, removal of the reservoir from the pocket, closure of the surgical incision.

Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Multimodal Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Performed via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated if the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) within a multimodal analgesia scheme would reduce acute post-operative pain and intravenous opioid consumption in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital of Siena (Italy).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients treated with intravenous opioids (OP-G) as a postoperative analgesic regimen were compared to those managed with an opioid-sparing protocol consisting of a single-shot SAPB with 0.5% ropivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone administered 1 hour before the extubation (SAPB-G). The behavioral pain scale (BPS) for intubated (I) or non-intubated patients (NI) and the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores were collected at ICU admission and every 8 hours during the initial 24 postoperative hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred five patients (50 SAPB-G; 55 OP-G) were enrolled (median age 67 [60-70]; male 67 [64%]). RASS score at 8 hours after ICU admission was higher in the SAPB-G (0 [0, 0] v OP-G -2 [-3, 0], p < 0.001). At 24 hours after ICU admission, the number of patients with a BPS/BPS-NI score >4 was lower in the SAPB-G (4.0% v 18.2% OP-G, p = 0.048). SAPB-G received a lower number of opioid rescue doses during the first 24 hours (20% v 84% OP-G, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SAPB may be effective in reducing the postoperative use of opioids in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Prospective randomized studies are warranted.

Femoral venous access: State of the art and future perspectives

In the past 5 years, non-dialysis femoral venous access has changed in terms of indications, techniques of insertion, and expected incidence of complications. To the traditional non-emergency indication for femoral catheters-obstruction of the superior vena cava-many other indications have been added, both in intensive and non-intensive care. The insertion technique has evolved, thanks to ultrasound guided venipuncture, tunneling, and ultrasound based intraprocedural tip location. Insertion of femorally inserted central catheters may be today regarded as a procedure with an extremely low intraprocedural and post-procedural risk. The risk of infection is reduced by the possibility of the exit site at mid-thigh, by the use of cyanoacrylate glue for sealing the exit site, and by appropriate intraprocedural strategies of infection prevention. The risk of catheter-related thrombosis is low, due to several concomitant strategies: a proper match between vein diameter and catheter caliber; an accurate intraprocedural assessment of tip location by ultrasound and/or intracavitary ECG; the consistent use of ultrasound guided venipuncture and micro-introducer kits; an adequate stabilization of the catheter at the exit site. The risk of mechanical complications and the risk of lumen occlusion are minimized when using polyurethane, power injectable catheters. All these novelties have brought a revolution in the field of femoral venous access, so that this route may be considered as safe and effective as other approaches to central venous catheterization.

Benefits of simulation for ultrasound-guided midline placement training: MC-in-Sim pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound-guided placement of Midlines catheters (MCs) is a standard procedure with many benefits for patients. Even if there are some guidelines worldwide, this invasive technique is still taught at the patient's bed and relies on mentoring in many care centers. The performance of this care by novice practitioners raises ethical and quality of care issues mainly because of its risk of complications. This study aimed to propose and assess a simulation-based learning method for the placement of MCs in novice practitioners.

METHODS

A single-center prospective observational study was conducted with anesthesia residents who had no prior experience of Midline placement. Two workshops were planned. The first one consisted of a theoretical training and a simulated practical phase. The second workshop included an assessment of theoretical memorization, a practical exercise and adherence to the training program.

RESULTS

The median score of the theoretical memorization was 14.6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 13.5-15.8). The MCs placement time was significantly higher (Med: 12.23 min; IQR: 12.21-12.80) for novice practitioners who did not successfully complete solo MCs placement in simulation versus novice practitioners who successfully completed solo MCs placement in simulation 6.66 min (IQR: 5.92-8.93) (p = 0.002). The number of attempts was significantly higher (p = 0.034) for the novice practitioners who did not successfully complete solo MCs placement in simulation with 67% having performed three punctures, against 0% for the novice practitioners who successfully completed solo MCs placement in simulation. All novice practitioners found this training model efficient for learning how to place MCs and considered it allows for reproducibility in care situations.

CONCLUSION

This ultrasound-guided MCs training on simulation is an agile and fast alternative to traditional bedside training for anesthesia novice practitioners.

Optimal insertion site for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization utilizing the dynamic needle tip positioning technique: A prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The dynamic needle tip positioning technique represents an advanced version of the short-axis out-of-plane ultrasound-guided approach employed for radial artery catheterization. The study aimed to explore the most effective insertion site capable of expeditiously and accurately executing the procedure in a clinical setting.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled study encompassed 246 elective surgery patients necessitating invasive arterial monitoring. Participants were randomly assigned to three distinct groups: Site 1 (targeting the radial styloid process), Site 2 (midway between Sites 1 and 3), and Site 3 (distal one-third of the forearm). The dynamic needle tip positioning technique was implemented across all groups. Crucial parameters, such as first-attempt success rate, time to success, overall success rate, total catheterization time, number of attempts, and complications, were meticulously documented and compared.

RESULTS

The Site 2 cohort presented a significantly heightened first-attempt success rate compared to Site 1 (97.5% vs 80%, p = 0.003) and Site 3 (97.5% vs 81.25%, p = 0.006). Moreover, Site 2 displayed a reduced time to success in contrast to Site 1 (31.5 vs 38, p = 0.003) and Site 3 (31.5 vs 40, p = 0.006). Total catheterization time was significantly shorter in Site 2 compared to Site 1 (32 vs 42.5, p < 0.001) and Site 3 (32 vs 43.5, p < 0.001). Site 2 necessitated fewer attempts than Site 1 (p = 0.02) and Site 3 (p = 0.03). Male gender and puncture at Site 2 were associated with expedited time to success. Adverse events manifested more frequently in the Site 3 group compared to the Site 1 group (15% vs 3.75%, p = 0.03) and the Site 2 group (15% vs 2.5%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal insertion site for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization utilizing the dynamic needle tip positioning technique in adult patients is situated midway between the radial styloid process and the distal one-third of the forearm.

PICC insertion and veins of the arm size variation during dialysis treatment: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters play an increasingly important role in Central Venous Access Devices. However, the use of these devices should be carefully considered in specific situations such as central catheterisation in patients with chronic kidney disease. When evaluating the feasibility of placement for a patient undergoing dialysis, the relationship between changes in circulating volume before and after dialysis treatment, and potential variations in the size of deep veins in the upper limbs, should be considered.

MATERIALS

Upper limb veins, specifically the basilic or brachial veins, were identified and measured before and after dialysis treatment. Patient data and weight loss data during dialysis treatment were also collected. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the correlation between the variables.

RESULTS

The average variation in vein size for the entire sample was +0.17 ± 0.43 mm. The mean volume removed was 2.2 ± 0.8 l. In subgroup 1 (fluid volume loss <2000 ml), the population experienced a decrease in the measured vein size after dialysis. In subgroup 2 (fluid volume loss ⩾2000 ml), the population experienced an increase in the measured vein size after dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper arm vascular access placement in dialysed patients with fluid removal of less than 2000 ml should be performed after the dialysis session. Conversely, in dialysed patients with fluid removal of more than 2000 ml, where a significant increase in vein size was observed, vascular access placement should be performed before the dialysis session when the veins are smaller. Additionally, it should be noted that in patients with chronic kidney disease, the venous system of the upper limbs should be preserved as much as possible to prevent thrombosis and stenosis in potential arteriovenous fistula creation.

A novel neonatal protocol for Safe Insertion of Umbilical Venous Catheters (SIUVeC): Minimizing complications in placement and management

Insertion of umbilical venous catheters is a common procedure in neonatal intensive care. Though sometimes lifesaving, this maneuver is potentially associated with early and late complications, some of which may be severe and even life threatening (catheter malposition, hepatic lesions, venous thrombosis, pericardial effusion, etc.). The recent literature suggests several operative strategies that, if adopted systematically, may significantly reduce the incidence of both early and late catheter related complications. This paper describes a standardized protocol (Safe Insertion Umbilical Venous Catheter = SIUVeC) which incorporates such novel strategies, with the goal of minimizing the complications related to this procedure.

Comparison of ultrasound guided supraclavicular subclavian vein versus infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein catheterization: A systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Subclavian vein cannulation is an important technique of central venous cannulation with a supraclavicular and an infraclavicular approach. There are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which highlight the various differences between these two approaches when accessed via ultrasound. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare the ultrasound guided supraclavicular subclavian and the infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein cannulation, keeping in mind that the infraclavicular approach may lead to cannulation of either subclavian/axillary vein.

METHODS

This meta-analysis encompassed studies that compared ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein and infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein. Binary outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Potential trials meeting the eligibility criteria were sought from databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, covering the period from inception to April 30, 2023.

RESULTS

The analysis comprised a total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective observational study collectively involving 1812 patients. The first pass success rate for subclavian vein catheterization was found to be greater with the supraclavicular approach (OR = 1.91 [95% CI 1.04-3.50]; p = 0.0002; I2 = 77%). Moreover, the supraclavicular approach exhibited a significantly shorter catheterization time compared to the infraclavicular approach (SMD = -0.26 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.03]; p = 0.003; I2 = 73%). Notably, there was no substantial disparity in complication rates between the two approaches (OR = 0.66 [95% CI 0.35-1.24]; p = 0.20; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterization is superior to the infraclavicular approach for subclavian/axillary vein catheterization, with higher first-pass success rates, shorter catheterization times. However, there were no differences in the complication rates.

Comparing static versus dynamic ultrasound techniques: A randomized pilot trial of novice and advanced users

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound training requires proper instruction and guidance tailored both to novice and advanced ultrasound users. The aim of the current investigation was to compare the performance of novice and advanced sonographers using a tofu model for IV cannula placement using either ultrasound static (US) or dynamic (UD) techniques.

METHODS

Eighty volunteers were allocated to either the novice or advanced group according to prior ultrasonography experience. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the US or UD group. A modified version of the global rating scale was used to assess performance. The primary outcome was the assessment scale composite score. Secondary outcomes included time to procedure completion and the number of needle passes.

RESULTS

In the novice cohort, the US group scored significantly higher than participants in the UD, median difference 9 (95% CI: 0-19), p = 0.01. In the advanced cohort, there was no difference in the performance score. Advanced participants performed the UD technique in less time than those using the US technique, 28.5 s (IQR 24-40) vs 42.5 s (IQR 30-55), median difference 14 (95% CI: 1-27), p = 0.02, respectively. Novices showed no difference in time to completion for either technique. In the novice cohort, the number of needle passes was less in the US group, median of 1 (IQR 1-2) compared to the UD group, median of 2 (IQR 1-3.75), median difference -1 (95% CI: -2 to 0), p = 0.03. There was no difference in the number of needle passes in either techniques involving the advanced users.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the real time UD method, the US technique for intravenous cannulation is more fitted for novice users and should be considered more widely as the introductory technique to improve their procedural efficiency of ultrasound guided intravenous cannulation.

Development and Implementation of an Ultrasound Wireless Technology Educational Program for Nursing Students: A Quality Improvement Project

Background: Training on the use of ultrasounds (US) is offered to nurses after their degree in specialization courses or in a work setting. When considering the positive impact of US on patient quality of care, this training should be offered to undergraduate nursing students. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess the quality of nursing curricula by evaluating the effects of an ultrasound technology educational program (USTep) on nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence, satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the training for the acquisition of US skills. Methods: 118 nursing students completed a 3-h USTep, that combined a theoretical introduction with simulation training. Data were collected before and after the USTep, using a survey with closed and open-ended questions. Results: After the educational program, a net increase was seen in knowledge about US (pre-test 48.1% vs. post-test 93.4%, p < 0.00001) and in student self-confidence (pre-test m = 1.7 ± 0.9 vs. post-test m = 3.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). According to the participants, this training benefited the students (during their training and for future employment opportunities), the patients, and the profession. Lastly, 97% of the sample expressed satisfaction with the training experience. Conclusions: This quality improvement project shows that a 3-h USTep improved undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, self-confidence, and satisfaction.

Guidelines for Performing Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography

Vascular access is a commonly performed procedure to facilitate patient care. This document provides expert consensus from diverse specialists on best practices and techniques for incorporating ultrasound (US) into vascular access procedures. This update replaces the 2011 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines for US-guided vascular cannulation. It includes recommendations for US-guided access to central and peripheral veins and arteries in adult and pediatric patients based on the strength of the scientific evidence present in the literature. The major roles of US during vascular access include (1) precannulation vessel assessment, (2) dynamic US guidance during cannulation, and (3) identification of local complications. This document discusses the general aspects of anatomic and US imaging of vessels, US-guided vascular cannulation techniques, and the identification of local vascular cannulation complications. Proper training should impart the cognitive knowledge and technical skills necessary to perform US-guided cannulation. There is an increasing body of literature indicating that US-guided vascular access improves success rates and reduces complications, although the quality of the evidence to date remains weak. A gap remains between the existing evidence and guidelines for the use of US in clinical practice. The availability of US equipment and clinical proficiency will more likely influence the role of US-guided vascular access as a standard of care than will future research studies.

Development of an educational program for ultrasound-based tip location during placement of PICC-port to improve the competence of specialized nurse

OBJECTIVES

To create an educational program and provide a valid, evidence-based course for ultrasound-based tip location during placement of PICC-port for specialized nurses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed three phases for program development. Phase 1: summarizing the evidences as a knowledge foundation; Phase 2: developing an educational program for ultrasound-based tip location during placement of PICC-port; Phase 3: expert panel to validate the developed program.

RESULTS

The educational program was composed of five parts and 12 lessons, with three lessons each devoted to basic knowledge, practice, and testing, respectively. First, the criteria for defining an expert trainer is determined. Second, some basic conditions are confirmed. Third, the image acquisition windows of transthoracic echocardiographic are recommended. Fourth, the knowledge about ultrasound-based tip location is categorized. Fifth, the procedures for ultrasound-based tip location combined with "bubble test" were listed. The program's content was verified by experts and found to have a validity coefficient of 0.95.

CONCLUSION

The program, encompassing theoretical and practical components, as well as assessment items, can be applied in specialized nursing education and skills training, and it enhances nurses' competence in accurately identifying the tip location during the placement of PICC-ports and other central venous access implants.

Compensatory response of the radial and ulnar arteries after radial artery cannulation in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Limited literature exists on the vascular reactivity of the radial and ulnar arteries in hypertensive patients following radial artery cannulation. This study assessed the vascular reactivity of the radial and ulnar arteries by comparing Doppler images and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) obtained from both normotensive and hypertensive patients after radial artery cannulation under general anesthesia.

METHODS

This study recruited 99 normotensive and 99 hypertensive patients who required arterial cannulation under general anesthesia. In the course of research, to evaluate the impact of hypertension on arterial reactivity, we employed duplex Doppler ultrasonography to measure the inner diameter (ID), resistance index (RI) and mean volume flow (MVF) of both arteries at five different time points. We equally performed perfusion of thumb and little finger by laser speckle contrast imaging.

RESULTS

After radial artery cannulation, the hypertensive group showed less increase in radial ID and less decrease in RI compared to the normotensive group. The MVF increase was also less pronounced in hypertensive patients, while both groups demonstrated equivalent ulnar ID changes, and the normotensive group exhibited a more significant decrease in RI and a greater MVF increase. Thumb perfusion decreased post-cannulation in both groups, with the hypertensive group showing a less robust recovery. Little finger perfusion increased after artery cannulation in both groups, but the hypertensive group's increase was lower. The incidence of vasospasm in the hypertensive group is higher than that in the normotensive group.

CONCLUSIONS

The radial and ulnar arteries in hypertensive patients may lack a compensatory response to radial artery cannulation during general anesthesia.

Safety and effectiveness of tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters versus conventional PICC in adult cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (T-PICC) vs. conventional PICCs (C-PICC) in adult cancer patients.

METHODS

A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted between April 2021 and January 2022 in seven hospitals in China. 564 participants were randomly assigned to T-PICC or C-PICC. These data were collected and compared: the baseline characteristics and catheterization-related characteristics, periprocedural complications, and long-term complications.

RESULTS

Five-hundred fifty-three participants (aged, 52.6 ± 12.3 years; female, 39.1%) were ultimately analyzed. No significant differences in periprocedural complications were found between the T-PICC and C-PICC groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with C-PICC, T-PICC significantly reduced the incidence of long-term complications (26.4% vs. 39.9%, p < 0.001). Specifically, reduced complications were found in central line-associated bloodstream infection (1.8% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.04), thrombosis (1.1% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.03), catheter dislodgement (4.7% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.01), non-infectious oozing (17.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.002), local infection (3.6% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.04), skin irritation (6.1% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.046), and reduced unplanned catheter removal (2.2% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.005). No significant differences were found between T-PICC and C-PICC regarding catheter occlusion (6.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.73) or skin damage (2.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

T-PICC is safe and effectively reduces long-term complications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The tunneled technique is effective in reducing PICC-related long-term complications. Thus, it is recommended for cancer patients at high risk of PICC-related complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The registration number on https://www.chictr.org.cn/ is ChiCTR2100044632. The name of the trial registry is "A multicenter randomized controlled study of clinical use of tunneled vs. non-tunneled PICC".

KEY POINTS

Cather-related complications are associated with the technique of catheterization. Compared with conventional PICC, tunneled PICC reduced catheter-related long-term complications. Tunneled PICC placement provides an alternative catheterization method for cancer patients.

The effect of smart glasses combined with ultrasound on radial arterial catheterization: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The integration of smart glasses with ultrasound technology offers a novel approach to improve the efficiency of radial arterial catheterization. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of smart glasses in enhancing procedural outcomes in a clinical setting. This study aims to assess whether smart glasses combined with ultrasound can improve the initial success rate of radial artery catheterization compared to traditional ultrasound-guided methods in adults.

METHODS

This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 18-70 with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, who required radial artery catheterization as part of their procedure under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized 1:1 into the ultrasound group and the smart glasses group. Radial arterial catheterization was carried out by one of six anesthesiologists before general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the first puncture success rate. Secondary endpoints included hand-eye coordination (measured by head rotations, probe repositioning and needle redirections), operator's satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients were analyzed, with the smart glasses group demonstrating a higher rate of first puncture success compared to the control group (88.3% [98/111] vs. 72.1% [80/111]; P = 0.002; relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% CI (1.07, 1.40)). Hand-eye coordination improved significantly in the smart glasses group than the control group, including: fewer number of head rotations (0 [0, 0] vs. 3 [2, 6]; P < 0.001); fewer number of ultrasound probe repositioning (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 1]; P < 0.001); fewer number of needle redirections (0 [0, 1] vs. 1 [0, 3]; P < 0.001). The proportion of positive satisfaction (81 to 100 points) in the smart glasses group was higher (89.2% [99/111] vs. 69.4% [77/111]; P <  0.001; RR, 1.29; 95% CI (1.12, 1.48)).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of smart glasses significantly improved the first puncture success rate, hand-eye coordination ability and operators' satisfaction in radial arterial catheterization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Chictr.org.cn with the number ChiCTR2400081399 on 29/02/2024.

Central venous catheter-related infections: a systematic review, meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression comparing ultrasound guidance and landmark technique for insertion

BACKGROUND

During central venous catheterization (CVC), ultrasound (US) guidance has been shown to reduce mechanical complications and increase success rates compared to the anatomical landmark (AL) technique. However, the impact of US guidance on catheter-related infections remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the risk of catheter-related infection with US-guided CVC versus AL technique.

METHODS

A systematic search on MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases was conducted until July 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) comparing US-guided versus AL-guided CVC placement were included. The primary outcome was a composite outcome including all types of catheter-related infection: catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter colonization, or any other type of reported infection. The secondary outcomes included individual infection types and mortality at day-28. Subgroup analyses based on study type and operator experience were also performed.

RESULTS

Pooling twelve studies (8 RCTs and 4 NRSI), with a total of 5,092 CVC procedures (2072 US-guided and 3020 AL-guided), US-guided CVC was associated with a significant reduction in catheter-related infections compared with the AL technique (risk ratio (RR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.88). In the RCT subgroup, the pooled RR was 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87). This effect was more pronounced in procedures performed by experienced operators (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.89). In inexperienced operators, the infection risk reduction was not statistically significant. The pooled analysis of CRBSIs and CLABSIs also favored US guidance (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.87).

CONCLUSION

US-guided CVC placement significantly reduces the risk of catheter-related infections compared to the AL technique, particularly when performed by experienced operators. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42022350884. Registered 13 August 2022.

Sonographic diagnosis and evaluation in patients with superficial radial arteries

BACKGROUND

The superficial radial artery (SRA) is a rare congenital anomaly in the forearm. However, it can be detected incidentally via trauma, intraoperative findings, angiography, or ultrasonography. In addition, intra-arterial infusion of intravenous medications and difficulties in radial artery catheterization may occur in cases of the SRA.

METHODS

Between December 2016 and July 2020, anomalous branches of radial arteries were found incidentally in nine patients at the preoperative visit and identified during ultrasound-guided radial artery puncture in 21 patients when radial artery catheterization using the palpation method proved difficult. Ultrasound examinations were performed for diagnosis and evaluation of these 30 patients.

RESULTS

All anomalous branches of the radial artery were SRAs; 11 (37%), 13 (43%), 6 (20%) were present on the right side, on the left side, and bilaterally, respectively. All SRAs ran close to the cephalic vein. The vascular diameters of the radial arteries were the smallest in the radial artery distal to the SRA bifurcation (followed by in the SRA) and the largest in the radial artery proximal to the bifurcation (p < .001). In two cases, color Doppler study revealed that both the blood flow and color Doppler signal of the SRA disappeared with compression of the radial artery proximal to the SRA bifurcation.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the SRA runs very close to the cephalic vein, a tourniquet applied to the arm may easily lead to intravenous catheter misplacement into the SRA. In addition, the small radial artery distal to the SRA bifurcation causes difficulty in radial artery catheterization. Furthermore, SRA cases may have falsely normal Allen's test results. Therefore, the authors recommend that the SRA must be identified before vascular puncture for safe vascular catheterization in the forearm.

The Midline Catheter Within the Context of Home Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment

Home intravenous antibiotic treatment (HIAT) consists of the administration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in the home of the patient. Short peripheral intravenous catheters have long been the first option for antimicrobial therapies. However, these devices are known for their short durability. At present, the midline catheter is one of the median duration devices most commonly used and recommended within the context of HIAT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of complications related to midline catheters implanted by a vascular access team in patients undergoing HIAT within the context of home hospitalization. This was a prospective observational study, which consecutively included 77 patients. A total of 92 midline catheters were analyzed. The complications observed were device obstruction (8.7%), infiltration (3.3%), dislodgement (2.2%), and thrombosis (1.1%). Bivariate analysis showed that the pH of the drug and ertapenem administration were associated with catheter obstruction. The authors found a low prevalence of midline catheter-associated complications in patients undergoing HIAT. The use of antireflux needleless connectors should be considered to reduce obstructions. In addition, algorithms that include the variable of type of daily life activity should be developed for deciding the most appropriate catheter for home hospitalized patients receiving HIAT.

Assessing the educational value and content of YouTube videos for ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization

BACKGROUND

The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a guideline regarding continuous ultrasound guidance for central venous catheters in 2020. YouTube has been a popular educational platform since its inception. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the adequacy of videos on ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization posted on YouTube based on this guideline.

METHOD

YouTube was scanned using the keywords associated with ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization and 46 of the 106 most-watched videos were included in the study. The videos were divided into three groups, as individual, manufacturer, and academic according to their sources, and were evaluated as poor, satisfactory, and good in terms of the overall content. The videos were then evaluated based on ESA's six-title guide for more specific informational content.

RESULTS

A total of 46 videos were reviewed and 52.2% (n = 24) were found to be prepared by individuals. Among the videos, the rate of videos describing only venipuncture (poor) was 23.9% (n = 11), 73.9% (n = 34) of videos described the verification of the guidewire location with venipuncture, and 2.2% of videos described all the recommendations suggested by the guide (n = 1). At the end of the catheterization procedure, 4.3% (n = 2) stated that the catheter location should be confirmed by using ultrasound, 15.2% (n = 7) recommended chest-X-ray, and 80.4% (n = 37) did not suggest any.

CONCLUSION

Manufacturer and academic videos can be watched due to their high-quality scores, but it may be practical to prepare training videos with guidelines both for educators and students to have global access to the renewed guideline information.

A GAVeCeLT bundle for PICC-port insertion: The SIP-Port protocol

In the last decade, a new type of brachial port has been introduced in clinical practice, the so-called "PICC-port." This is a brachial port, but inserted according to the methodologies and technologies currently adopted for the insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Several studies have shown that PICC-port insertion is safe, not associated with any relevant immediate or early complication, and that the expected incidence of late complications is significantly lower if compared to "traditional" brachial ports (i.e. inserted without ultrasound guidance). Furthermore, PICC-ports yield excellent esthetic results and are associated with optimal patient compliance. This paper describes an insertion bundle-developed by GAVeCeLT, the Italian Group of Long Term Venous Access Devices, and nicknamed "SIP-Port" (Safe Insertion of PICC-Ports)-which consists of few evidence-based strategies aiming to further minimize all immediate, early, or late complications potentially associated with PICC-port insertion. Also, this insertion bundle has been developed for the purpose of defining more closely the differences between a traditional brachial port and a PICC-port. The SIP-Port bundle is currently adopted by all training courses on PICC-port insertion held by GAVeCeLT. It includes eight steps: (1) preprocedural ultrasound assessment utilizing the RaPeVA (Rapid Peripheral Venous Assessment) protocol; (2) appropriate skin antiseptic technique and maximal barrier precautions; (3) choice of appropriate vein, in terms of caliber and site; (4) clear identification of the median nerve and of the brachial artery during the venipuncture; (5) ultrasound-guided puncture and cannulation of the vein; (6) ultrasound-guided tip navigation; (7) intra-procedural assessment of tip location by intracavitary ECG or by trans-thoracic echocardiography; (8) appropriate creation and closure of the subcutaneous pocket.

U-Net and Its Variants Based Automatic Tracking of Radial Artery in Ultrasonic Short-Axis Views: A Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Radial artery tracking (RAT) in the short-axis view is a pivotal step for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization (RAC), which is widely employed in various clinical settings. To eliminate disparities and lay the foundations for automated procedures, a pilot study was conducted to explore the feasibility of U-Net and its variants in automatic RAT. Methods: Approved by the institutional ethics committee, patients as potential RAC candidates were enrolled, and the radial arteries were continuously scanned by B-mode ultrasonography. All acquired videos were processed into standardized images, and randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. Deep learning models, including U-Net and its variants, such as Attention U-Net, UNet++, Res-UNet, TransUNet, and UNeXt, were utilized for automatic RAT. The performance of the deep learning architectures was assessed using loss functions, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC). Performance differences were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The independent datasets comprised 7233 images extracted from 178 videos of 135 patients (53.3% women; mean age: 41.6 years). Consistent convergence of loss functions between the training and validation sets was achieved for all models except Attention U-Net. Res-UNet emerged as the optimal architecture in terms of DSC and JSC (93.14% and 87.93%), indicating a significant improvement compared to U-Net (91.79% vs. 86.19%, p < 0.05) and Attention U-Net (91.20% vs. 85.02%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: This pilot study validates the feasibility of U-Net and its variants in automatic RAT, highlighting the predominant performance of Res-UNet among the evaluated architectures.

Wire-in-needle versus conventional syringe-on-needle technique for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion in the internal jugular vein: the WIN randomized trial

PURPOSE

There are different techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. When using the conventional syringe-on-needle technique, the syringe needs to be removed from the needle after venous puncture to pass the guidewire through the needle into the vein. When, alternatively, using the wire-in-needle technique, the needle is preloaded with the guidewire, and the guidewire-after venous puncture-is advanced into the vein under real-time ultrasound guidance. We tested the hypothesis that the wire-in-needle technique reduces the time to successful guidewire insertion in the internal jugular vein compared with the syringe-on-needle technique in adults.

METHODS

We randomized 250 patients to the wire-in-needle or syringe-on-needle technique. Our primary endpoint was the time to successful guidewire insertion in the internal jugular vein.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty eight patients were analyzed. The median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) time to successful guidewire insertion was 22 (16, 38) s in patients assigned to the wire-in-needle technique and 25 (19, 34) s in patients assigned to the syringe-on-needle technique (estimated location shift: 2 s; 95%-confidence-interval: - 1 to 5 s, p = 0.165). CVC insertion was successful on the first attempt in 103/116 patients (89%) assigned to the wire-in-needle technique and in 113/122 patients (93%) assigned to the syringe-on-needle technique. CVC insertion-related complications occurred in 8/116 patients (7%) assigned to the wire-in-needle technique and 19/122 patients (16%) assigned to the syringe-on-needle technique.

CONCLUSION

The wire-in-needle technique-compared with the syringe-on-needle technique-did not reduce the time to successful guidewire insertion in the internal jugular vein. Clinicians can consider either technique for ultrasound-guided CVC insertion in adults.

Ultrasound Guidance for Transradial Access in the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although ultrasound (US) guidance for vascular access has been widely adopted, its use for transradial access (TRA) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory is rare. There is a perception that US guidance does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over traditional palpation-guided TRA, amplified by inconsistent findings of individual studies.

METHOD

A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library identified studies comparing US to palpation-guided TRA for cardiac catheterisation. Studies evaluating radial artery (RA) cannulation for any other reason were excluded. Event rates and risk ratios (RRs) were pooled for meta-analysis. Access failure was the primary outcome. A random-effects model was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 977 records screened, four studies with a total of 1,718 patients (861 US-guided and 864 palpation-guided procedures) were included in the meta-analysis. Most procedures were elective. The pooled analysis showed US guidance significantly lowered the risk of access failure (RR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.97; p=0.04). Heterogeneity was moderate (I2=51.2%; p=0.105). There was a strong trend to improved first-pass success with US (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.00-1.66; p=0.05; I2=83.8%), although no differences were found in rates of difficult access (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.07-1.18; p=0.09; I2=88.3%). Salvage US guidance was successful in 30/41 (73.2%) patients following failed palpation-guided TRA. No differences were found in already low complication rates including RA spasm (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.70-1.99; p=0.53; I2=0.0%) and bleeding (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.46-3.80; p=0.60; I2=0.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

US guidance was found to improve TRA success in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether routine, selective, or salvage use of US confers the most RA protection, patient satisfaction, and overall clinical benefit. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022332238).

Systematic review of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement-related complications in neonates and infants aged <12 months

OBJECTIVE

Although ultrasound can be considered an assistant method, successful placement of a central venous catheter (CVC) in infants is still challenging. The incidence of CVC placement-related complications is still high. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence to assess the effects of ultrasound-guided CVC placement on adverse outcomes in infants and neonates aged <12 months.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify potentially relevant studies. The main outcome was the incidence of adverse events, which included inadvertent arterial puncture, hematoma, pneumothorax and hemothorax, catheter kinking, threading, and malpositioning problems, venous thrombosis, catheter-related infection, phlebitis, and cardiac tamponade.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 2097 patients were included in the final analysis. The odds of inadvertent arterial puncture, and catheter kinking, threading, and malpositioning problems were lower in the ultrasound group than in the control group. No significant difference was detected in the incidence of hematoma or venous thrombosis between the control and ultrasound groups. Other complications, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, phlebitis, and cardiac tamponade, rarely occurred.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided CVC placement can improve the safety of punctures in neonates and infants. CVC punctures should be guided in real-time by ultrasound.

Training for ultrasound-guided implantation of central venous catheters eliminates venolysis in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

In the pediatric setting, the procurement of vascular access can be particularly difficult. Surgical venolysis was the first technique described but, in recent years, the literature has shown that ultrasound-guided implantation has fewer complications. The principal aim of this paper is to state how after a structured training to place ultrasound-guided central lines, venolysis was definitively abandoned in our hospital. We also analyzed the impact of training on the duration of procedures. Finally, the number of procedures performed per operator to maintain the quality standard achieved.

METHOD

In this observational retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2013 to 2020 of 1497 pediatric and neonatal central venous access placements in a single center during a training path.

RESULTS

Venolysis performed by the pediatric surgeons was used in 11% of total placements, the most in the smallest patients (76.1%, <1 year of age). With the implementation of training, this invasive technique became obsolete to the point where it was no longer practiced (24.6% of vascular placement in 2013 to 0% in 2020). In the placement performed by the pediatric anesthesiologists, time progressively decreased from 51.5 min in 2013 to 29.4 min in 2022. From the analysis of the number of procedures performed by pediatric anesthesiologists, the first consultant involved performed averaging 48 procedures per year, while the other consultants had an overall average of 16.7-25 placements per year.

CONCLUSION

Echo-guided vascular cannulation was found to be safe, reliable, and reproducible in pediatric patients and neonates and permits to deletion definitively venolysis. Well-structured training is essential and should be standardized in the future.

The safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Centrally inserted central venous catheters (CICCs) are commonly placed in critically ill patients who require a central venous catheter (CVC). Recently, peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) have been widely used on general wards. However, the safety of PICCs in critically ill patients remains unclear.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective observational study at a mixed intensive care unit (ICU). Adult patients (⩾18 years) who were emergently admitted to the ICU and underwent CVC insertion between April 2019 and March 2021 were enrolled. We compared the safety of PICCs and CICCs. The primary outcome was the overall rate of catheter-related complications, including bloodstream infections, thrombosis, insertional trauma, catheter malfunction, and accidental removal. We used a stabilized inverse probability weighting (sIPW) model to estimate the effects of PICC use.

RESULTS

A total of 239 CVCs (PICCs, 53; CICCs, 186) were inserted into 229 patients. Although the severity of illness did not differ significantly between the groups, the length of hospital stay and mean indwelling catheter duration were significantly longer in the PICC group. There was no significant intergroup difference in the overall rate of catheter-related complications (PICC: 9.4% vs CICC: 3.8%; odds ratio [OR]: 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-10.2, p = 0.145), and there were 7.7 and 9.0 complications per 1000 catheter days in the PICC and CICC groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.14-2.65, p = 0.513). After adjustment using the sIPW model, PICC use was not found to be associated with a reduction in catheter-related complications (adjusted OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 0.90-10.7; adjusted HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.14-1.97).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant differences in catheter-related complications between patients treated using CICCs and those treated using PICCs after emergency ICU admission. Our findings imply that PICCs may be an alternative to CICCs in critically ill patients.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning and acoustic shadowing technique with palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation by experienced clinicians: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Radial artery cannulation is usually done for monitoring invasive blood pressure during intraoperative period. The dynamic needle tip positioning approach allows continuous visualization of the needle tip during ultrasound-guided cannulation. The acoustic shadowing technique, using two lines on the ultrasound probe, might be used to facilitate radial artery puncture. We aimed to compare these two ultrasound-guided techniques of radial artery cannulation with the traditional palpation method in adult patients.

METHODS

In this trial, 180 adult patients requiring arterial cannulation were randomized into three groups (Traditional palpation (TP), Dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP), and acoustic shadow technique (AST)). All cannulations were carried out by experienced anesthetists. Data was analyzed for the success rate of arterial cannulation in the first attempt, total number of attempts in 5 min, time taken to cannulate, number of cannulas used, and complications related to the procedure.

RESULTS

The first attempt success rates among TP, DNTP, and AST were 66.7%, 66.7%, and 71.7%, respectively (p = 0.794). The median time taken for cannulation was 60.5 (37.0, 129.5) s, 71.0 (50.0, 170.0) s, and 108.0 (58.0, 181.0) s, respectively (p = 0.066) and the median number of cannulation attempts was 1, in all the three groups (p = 0.684). There was also no difference in the total number of cannulas used, the overall success rate of cannulation, and complications related to the procedure in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The TP, DNTP, and AST technique for radial artery cannulation had comparable first attempt success rate, the time taken for cannulation, the number of cannulas used, and overall complications. We conclude that radial arterial cannulation by palpation, as well as ultrasound-guided DNTP and AST techniques performed by experienced clinicians in hemodynamically stable adult patients are equally advantageous.

Ultrasound-guided Axillary Artery Catheter Placement and Associated Complications in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Arterial catheter placement for hemodynamic monitoring is commonly performed in critically ill patients. The radial and femoral arteries are the two sites most frequently used; there is limited data on the use of the axillary artery for this purpose. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of complications from ultrasound-guided axillary artery catheter placement in critically ill patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study at a tertiary care center of patients admitted to an intensive care unit who had ultrasound-guided axillary artery catheter placement during admission. Primary outcome of interest was catheter related complications, including bleeding, vascular complications, compartment syndrome, stroke or air embolism, catheter malfunction, and need for surgical intervention.

RESULTS

This study identified 88 patients who had an ultrasound-guided axillary artery catheter placed during their admission. Of these 88, nine patients required multiple catheters placed, for a total of 99 axillary artery catheter placement events. The median age was 64 [IQR 48, 71], 41 (47%) were female, and median body mass index (BMI) was 26 [IQR 22, 30]. The most common complication was minor bleeding (11%), followed by catheter malfunction (2%), and vascular complications (2%). Univariate analyses did not show any association between demographics and clinical variables, and complications related to axillary arterial catheter.

CONCLUSION

The most common complication found with ultrasound-guided axillary artery catheter placement was minor bleeding, followed by catheter malfunction, and vascular complications. Ultrasound-guided axillary arterial catheters are an alternative in patients in whom radial or femoral arterial access is difficult or not possible to achieve.

Safe Insertion of Arterial Catheters (SIA): An ultrasound-guided protocol to minimize complications for arterial cannulation

Direct puncture and cannulation of peripheral arteries is frequently performed in critical care and in emergency settings, mainly for hemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling. While there is abundant literature on peripheral arterial cannulation in children and adults, there is still scope for clinical improvements which may impact on patient safety. Although the radial artery is the most frequently utilized access site today, due to its superficial proximity, ease of access, and low risk of adverse events, other sites are sometimes chosen. The authors propose the Safe Insertion of Arterial Catheters (SIA) protocol, an ultrasound-guided insertion bundle applying a systematic approach to arterial cannulation, with a focus on improving insertion practices, reducing procedural complications, increasing the patient safety profile, and improving device performance.

A retrospective observational study of real-time ultrasound-guided peripheral arterial cannulation in infants

OBJECTIVE

To examine first attempt success and overall success of real-time ultrasound guided peripheral arterial cannulation in infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of 477 ultrasound guided peripheral arterial cannulations in infants less than 1 year of age. Procedural and patient characteristics were evaluated to better understand factors related to procedural success.

RESULTS

Ultrasound guided peripheral arterial cannulation had a first attempt success rate of 65% and an overall success rate of 86%. Success rates significantly differed by arterial location (p < 0.001). First attempt success and overall success were highest in the radial artery (72%, 91%) and lowest in the posterior tibial artery (44%, 71%). Success was more likely with greater age and greater weight (p = 0.006, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Success rates are high when using a real-time ultrasound-guided technique for peripheral arterial cannulation in infants. An infant's weight and selected artery are strong predictors of success when performing peripheral arterial cannulation. The use of procedural ultrasound may reduce unnecessary attempts and minimize procedure-related harm.

Peripheral venous dilation using flow-mediated dilation response: A randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND

Venodilation is crucial in enhancing the success rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a vasodilatory response initiated by temporary ischemia followed by reperfusion. This crossover study aimed to test the hypothesis that FMD induces dilation of the peripheral veins of the forearm.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent the FMD and control conditions in a randomized order. FMD involved a 5-min occlusion of blood flow in the brachial artery, followed by reperfusion, achieved by inflating and deflating a cuff placed on the upper arm. The control condition involved participants remaining at rest. The primary outcome measure was a change in the cross-sectional area of the cephalic vein post-intervention. The secondary outcomes included changes in venous diameter and perfusion index (PI).

RESULTS

FMD significantly increased the cross-sectional area of the cephalic vein compared with the control condition (relative change to baseline: 37.7% (31.4) vs 2.2% (11.7)), with a mean difference of 35.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16.4-54.5, p = 0.001). Both longitudinal and transverse diameters were significantly expanded with FMD compared to the control (relative change to baseline: 15.7% (15.4) vs 2.6% (3.6), p = 0.004; 18.9% (15.6) vs -0.0 (10.2), p = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, PI significantly increased with FMD compared with the control (relative change to baseline: 77.8% (56.9) vs 14.6% (36.0)), with a mean difference of 63.2% (95% CI: 31.2-95.2, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

FMD application induced dilation of the cephalic vein of the forearm. The findings suggest that FMD is an effective technique for dilating the venous area and potentially improving the success rate of peripheral intravenous cannulation.

A GAVeCeLT consensus on the indication, insertion, and management of central venous access devices in the critically ill

Central venous access devices are essential for the management of critically ill patients, but they are potentially associated with many complications, which may occur during or after insertion. Many evidence-based documents-consensus and guidelines-suggest practical recommendations for reducing catheter-related complications, but they have some limitations. Some documents are not focused on critically ill patients; other documents address only some special strategies, such as the use of ultrasound; other documents are biased by obsolete concepts, inappropriate terminology, and lack of considerations for new technologies and new methods. Thus, the Italian Group of Venous Access Devices (GAVeCeLT) has decided to offer an updated compendium of the main strategies-old and new-that should be adopted for minimizing catheter-related complications in the adult critically ill patient. The project has been planned as a consensus, rather than a guideline, since many issues in this field are relatively recent, and few high-quality randomized clinical studies are currently available, particularly in the area of indications and choice of the device. Panelists were chosen between the Italian vascular access experts who had published papers on peer-reviewed journals about this topic in the last few years. The consensus process was carried out according to the RAND/University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Methodology, a modification of the Delphi method, that is, a structured process for collecting knowledge from groups of experts through a series of questionnaires. The final document has been structured as statements which answer to four major sets of questions regarding central venous access in the critically ill: (1) before insertion (seven questions), (2) during insertion (eight questions), (3) after insertion (three questions), and (4) at removal (three questions).

Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Vital Tool for Anesthesiologists in the Perioperative and Critical Care Settings

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential skill in various specialties like anesthesiology, critical care, and emergency medicine. Anesthesiologists utilize POCUS for quick diagnosis and procedural guidance in perioperative and critical care settings. Key applications include vascular ultrasound for challenging venous and arterial catheter placements, gastric ultrasound for aspiration risk assessment, airway ultrasound, diaphragm ultrasound, and lung ultrasound for respiratory assessment. Additional utilities of POCUS can include multi-organ POCUS evaluation for undifferentiated shock or cardiac arrest, ultrasound-guided central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks, focused cardiac ultrasound, and novel applications such as venous excess ultrasound. This review highlights these POCUS applications in perioperative and intensive care and summarizes the latest evidence of their accuracy and limitations.

A narrative review on tip navigation and tip location of central venous access devices in the neonate: Intracavitary ECG or real time ultrasound?

The proper location of the tip of a central venous access device plays a crucial role in minimizing the risks potentially associated with its use. Recent guidelines strongly recommend preferring real-time, intra-procedural methods of tip location since they are more accurate, more reliable and more cost-effective than post-procedural methods. Intracavitary electrocardiography and real time ultrasound can both be applied in the neonatal setting, but they offer different advantages or disadvantages depending on the type of central venous access device. Reviewing the evidence currently available about the use of these two methods in neonates, in terms of applicability, feasibility and accuracy, it can be concluded that (a) real time ultrasound is the only acceptable methodology for tip navigation for any central venous access device in neonates, (b) intracavitary electrocardiography is the preferred method of tip location for central catheters inserted by ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein or the brachiocephalic vein, and (c) real time ultrasound is the preferred method of tip location for umbilical venous catheters, epicutaneo-cava catheters, and central catheters inserted by ultrasound-guided cannulation of the common femoral vein.

Comparison of different venous access ways for right heart catheterization-a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Right heart catheterization (RHC) is a common diagnostic tool and of special importance in the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Until today, there have been no clear instructions or guidelines on which venous access to prefer. This meta-analysis assessed whether the choice of the venous access site for elective RHC has an impact on procedural or clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A structured literature search was performed. Single-arm reports and controlled trials reporting event data were eligible. The primary endpoint was a composite of access-related and overall complications.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies, including 6509 RHC procedures, were eligible. The results were analyzed in two groups. The first group compared central venous access (CVA; n = 2072) with peripheral venous access (PVA; n = 2680) and included only multi-arm studies (n = 12, C/P comparison). In the second group, all studies (n = 19, threeway comparison) were assessed to compare the three individual access ways. The overall complication rate was low at 1.0% (n = 68). The primary endpoint in the C/P comparison occurred significantly less for PVA than for CVA (0.1% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.004). In the threeway comparison, PVA had a significantly lower complication rate than femoral access (0.3% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.04). Jugular access had the numerically highest complication rate (2.0%), but the difference was not significant compared to peripheral (0.3%; p = 0.29) or femoral access (1.1%; p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that PVA for RHC has a significantly lower complication rate than CVA. There was a low level of certainty and high heterogeneity. This pooled data analysis indicated PVA as the primary venous access for RHC.

"Rapid Atrial Swirl Sign": A Better Tool Than the Landmark Technique for Ensuring Correct Depth of Insertion of Central Venous Catheters

INTRODUCTION

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in the management and resuscitation of critically ill patients in emergency departments and intensive care units. Correct depth of insertion of the CVC line is important to ensure uninterrupted flow, avoid complications, and monitor central venous pressure. Transthoracic echocardiography, with contrast enhancement, has been proposed as an alternative to chest X-ray in detecting central venous line positioning with high accuracy. Nevertheless, this method is not widely used due to some previous conflicting results and the cumbersomeness of the procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee, this prospective observational study was carried out in patients for whom a central venous line was warranted. The study was conducted in the Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital among 150 adult patients to compare the "Rapid Atrial Swirl Sign" (RASS) technique by transthoracic echocardiography and the landmark-based technique for ensuring accurate depth of central venous line placement.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that the mean depth of insertion of the CVC for the Echocardiography RASS group (E) was 12.84 cm, while for the Landmark technique group (L), it was 12.02 cm. There was a significant difference between these groups, with a p-value of <0.05. We found that the majority of patients (98.63%) in Group E had the catheter tip in Zones 1, 2, and 3, while only 66.6% of patients in Group L had the catheter tip in similar zones. The mean standard deviation for zones on chest X-ray was 1.8 for Group E and 2.26 for Group L, with a significant difference between these groups (p-value <0.05).

CONCLUSION

The RASS technique is superior to the landmark technique in ensuring the correct depth of the tip of the CVC. When confirmed by chest X-ray, it was found that most patients had the catheter tip in Zone 1, 2, or 3 using the RASS technique. This confirms that the RASS technique can minimize the requirement of resources and hasten the initiation of patient management in a timely manner, unlike the landmark technique, which requires chest X-ray confirmation before use.

Ultrasound-guided Arterial Cannulation: What are We Missing and Where are We Headed?

How to cite this article: Soni KD. Ultrasound-guided Arterial Cannulation: What are We Missing and Where are We Headed? Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):632-633.

Effectiveness of head-mounted ultrasound display for radial arterial catheterisation in paediatric patients by anaesthesiology trainees: A randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of head mounted real-time ultrasound displays (hereafter referred to as 'smart glasses') in improving hand-eye coordination in less experienced individuals, such as trainees in anaesthesia, is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the first-attempt success rate of smart glasses-assisted ultrasound-guided paediatric radial artery catheterisation with conventional ultrasound guided catheterisation performed by anaesthesiology trainees.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised controlled trial.

SETTINGS

Tertiary university hospital from September 2021 to February 2023.

PATIENTS

One hundred and twenty-two paediatric patients (age <7 years, weight ≥3 kg) who required radial artery cannulation during general anaesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were randomly assigned to either the ultrasound screen group (control) or the smart glasses group prior to radial artery catheterisation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes included the number of attempts, use of transfixion technique, overall complication rate, and clinical anaesthesiology (CA) year of the operators.

RESULTS

A total of 119 paediatric patients were included in the analysis. The smart glasses group exhibited higher first-attempt success rate than did the control group (89.8% [53/59] vs. 71.7% [43/60]; P  = 0.023; odds ratio (OR) 3.49; (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-9.6). The overall number of attempts [median, 1; interquartile range (IQR), 1-1; range, 1-3 vs. median, 1; IQR, 1-2; range, 1-4; P   =  0.006], use of transfixion technique (12/59 [20.3%] vs. 28/60 [46.7%]; P  = 0.002), and overall complication rate (6.8% [4/59] vs. 30.0% [18/60]; P  = 0.002) were lower in the smart glasses group than in the control group. However, among paediatric anaesthesiology fellows (CA 5 years), the first- (89.3% [25/28] vs. 80.8% [21/26]; P  = 0.619) and second-attempt success rates (96.4% [27/28] vs. 80.8% [21/26]; P  = 0.163) did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Smart glasses-assisted ultrasound guided radial artery catheterisation improved the first attempt success rate among anaesthesiology trainees, reducing the number of attempts and overall complication rates in small paediatric patients. Smart glasses were more effective for anaesthesia residents (CA 2-4 years) but were not effective for paediatric anaesthesiology fellows (CA 5 years).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05030649) ( https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05030649 ).

Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Aim and background

Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization is a frequently performed procedure. Additional techniques such as acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound may be useful in improving success rate. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of acoustic shadowing assisted ultrasound for arterial catheterization.

Materials and methods

PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, EMCARE, and MedNar were searched in January 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the first attempt success rate of arterial catheterization using acoustic shadowing ultrasound vs unassisted ultrasound were included. Data were pooled for risk ratios (RRs) using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on a single or double acoustic line. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken after excluding pediatric data. The certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using the GRADE framework.

Results

Six randomized controlled trials (n = 777) were included. A meta-analysis found the first attempt success rate is significantly higher in the acoustic ultrasound group (n = 6, RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.66, p ≤ 0.00001). Hematoma formation was significantly less in the acoustic ultrasound group (n = 6, RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.34-0.80, p = 0.003). First attempt success was significantly higher in the single acoustic line ultrasound (USG) group compared to the unassisted ultrasound group (n = 3, RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, p ≤ 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis after excluding pediatric data was similar to the primary analysis (n = 5, RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.70, p ≤ 0.00001). Certainty of evidence was "Moderate" for the first attempt cannulation.

Conclusions

Acoustic shadowing-assisted ultrasound improved first-attempt arterial catheterization success rate and was associated with reduced hematoma formation.

How to cite this article

Mishra L, Rath C, Wibrow B, Anstey M, Ho K. Acoustic Shadowing to Facilitate Ultrasound Guided Arterial Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):677-685.

Ultrasound guided cannulation of the right subclavian vein via a supraclavicular approach for the placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt

Central venous cannulation is usually performed via the internal jugular vein (IJV) or subclavian vein (SclV) using the Seldinger technique. The puncture of the SclV can be achieved supraclavicular which was described by Yoffa in 1965. The original approach by Yoffa is based on anatomical landmarks. Ventriculoatrial (VA) shunts in patients suffering from hydrocephalus are becoming more common. It is the procedure of choice in patients with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt complications. We present a case of a female patient with a complex cervical venous anatomy and an obscure inaccessible right internal jugular vein (IJV). Subsequently, we decided to use an ultrasound guided supraclavicular approach to the right subclavian vein for implantation of a VA shunt.

Caliber of the deep veins of the arm in infants and neonates: The VEEIN study (Vascular Echography Evaluation in Infants and Neonates)

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in children, though their insertion may be limited by the small caliber of the deep veins of the arm. Previous studies have suggested to use age or weight as a guide to the feasibility of PICC insertion. We have planned an observational study with the purpose of identifying the actual feasibility of PICC insertion based on the ultrasound evaluation of the deep veins of the arm in groups of children of different weight range.

METHODS

We have studied 252 children weighing between 2.5 and 20 kg, divided in five different groups (group 1: 2.5-4 kg; group 2: 4.1-7 kg; group 3: 7.1-10 kg; group 4: 10.1-15 kg; group 5: 15.1-20 kg): the caliber of brachial vein, basilic vein, and cephalic vein at mid-upper arm + the caliber of the axillary vein at the axilla were measured by ultrasound scan.

RESULTS

Veins of caliber >3 mm (appropriate for insertion of a 3 Fr non-tunneled PICC) were found at mid-upper arm in no child of group 1 or 2, in 13% of group 3, in 28% of group 4, and in 54% of group 5. An axillary vein >3 mm (appropriate for insertion of a 3 Fr tunneled PICC) were found in 5.8% of group 1, 30.6% of group 2, 67% of group 3, 82% of group 4, and 94% of group 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The age and the weight of the child have a small role in predicting the caliber of the veins of the arm. Veins should be measured case by case through a proper and systematic ultrasound evaluation; however, the clinician can expect that insertion of a 3 Fr PICC may be feasible in one third of children weighing between 4 and 7 kg, and in most children weighing more than 7 kg, especially if adopting the tunneling technique.

Impact of distance of the catheter tip from cavo-atrial junction on bubble test (delay) time: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Correct tip positioning is a critical aspect in central vascular access devices insertion. The verification of positioning at the cavo-atrial junction is usually performed by intracavitary electrocardiography. Recently, echocardiographic techniques were proposed, including the direct visualization of the catheter or the visualization of a saline/air bolus (i.e. "bubble test"). As for the latter, a push-to-bubbles delay time below 2 s was proposed to indicate a correct positioning of the catheter tip. The aim of this study was to measure the variations of the push-to-bubbles time at increasing distance from the cavo-atrial junction, to verify if a cut-off of 1-2 s correspond to a well-positioned catheter.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study including patients with clinical indication of positioning a peripherally inserted central catheter. The catheter tip was positioned at the cavo-atrial junction (P0) via intracavitary electrocardiography, and the push-to-bubbles delay time was measured. The catheter was then retracted 5 cm (P1) and 10 cm (P2), and the test was repeated at this positioning. Push-to-bubbles time measurements were performed off-line by analyzing an audio/video recording which included the echography screen and the voice signal of the operator.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included. The average push-to-bubble time when the catheter tip was in the reference position was 0.41 ± 0.21 s. Retraction of the PICC catheter of 5 and 10 cm determined a significant increase of the push-to-bubbles time: mean time difference was +0.34 (95% IC 0.25-0.43, p < 0.001) s between P0 and P1 (5 cm distance), and +0.77 (95% IC 0.62-0.92, p < 0.001) s between P0 and P2 (10 cm distance). When the catheter was at the reference position (i.e. cavo-atrial junction) only 2.1% of bubbles delay times were above 1 s.

CONCLUSION

The push-to-bubbles time is very low when the catheter tip is at the cavo-atrial junction. This delay increases progressively with increasing distance from the target. Push-to-bubbles delay time above 1 s might indicate a catheter not close to the cavo-atrial junction.

Iatrogenic injury to the subclavian artery during central venous access

Subclavian artery injury during central venous line placement is a potentially life-threatening complication. Due to historically high mortality rates with attempted manual pressure for haemostasis, the current favoured method of repair is by open or endovascular means. This case describes the management of a central venous catheter placed through the internal jugular vein into the subclavian artery via a supraclavicular puncture. CT angiography revealed the arterial injury located 1 cm distal to the vertebral artery origin. Under fluoroscopic guidance in an endovascular hybrid theatre, a covered stent was deployed across the affected segment of the subclavian artery which resulted in occlusion of the vertebral artery origin to attain safe proximal seal. This was done during simultaneous removal of the catheter and manual pressure over the internal jugular vein. There were no complications and the patient recovered well post-procedure. This case highlights the importance of appropriate ultrasound techniques for central catheter insertion for precise visualisation to prevent inadvertent injury to distal structures. CT angiography is useful in planning endovascular management. Occlusion of the vertebral artery in this case did not result in any neurological complications.

Development and evaluation of an algorithm for peripheral venous catheter placement (ALCOV): protocol for a quasi-experimental study

INTRODUCTION

Multiple punctures during peripheral venous catheter (PVC) placement increase the risk of complications. Scoring for adult difficult intravenous access (A-DIVA Scale) exists but has never been assessed in the framework of a care algorithm (scoring associated with a new decision-making tree for puncture conditions, the A-DIVA Tree). We seek to implement an catheter placement algorithm to decrease the mean number of punctures per patient. The algorithm will be adjusted based on obstacles and levers revealed by the analysis of clinical data. The benefits of the algorithm will be assessed using a step-by-step implementation of the approach.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

794 PVC placements will be recorded in two inclusion centres (50%/50%). In phase I, 297 PVC placements will be collected, and 16 individual semistructured interviews will be conducted to evaluate the centres' practices. In phase II, 200 PVC placements will be recorded to assess the impact of the A-DIVA Scale alone. The interphase will allow preliminary results based development of the A-DIVA Tree. In phase III, 297 PVC placements will be recorded to assess the impact of the algorithm on the mean number of punctures per patient.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study and related consent forms were approved by an institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Méditerranée I) on 25 April 2023 under reference number 2023-A00223-42. The results will be disseminated in the form of original articles, presentations and guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05935228.

The pediatric DAV-expert algorithm: A GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access device in children

In pediatric patients, the choice of the venous access device currently relies upon the operator's experience and preference and on the local availability of specific resources and technologies. Though, considering the limited options for venous access in children if compared to adults, such clinical choice has a great critical relevance and should preferably be based on the best available evidence. Though some algorithms have been published over the last 5 years, none of them seems fully satisfactory and useful in clinical practice. Thus, the GAVePed-which is the pediatric interest group of the most important Italian group on venous access, GAVeCeLT-has developed a national consensus about the choice of the venous access device in children. After a systematic review of the available evidence, the panel of the consensus (which included Italian experts with documented competence in this area) has provided structured recommendations answering 10 key questions regarding the choice of venous access both in emergency and in elective situations, both in the hospitalized and in the non-hospitalized child. Only statements reaching a complete agreement were included in the final recommendations. All recommendations were also structured as a simple visual algorithm, so as to be easily translated into clinical practice.

Radiation dose reduction during venous access port implantation: the importance of upgrading equipment and radiation-protection training

BACKGROUND

Implantable central venous port systems are widely used in oncology. We upgraded our fluoroscopy machines, and all anesthetists completed two training courses focusing on the risks of ionizing radiation for patients and health workers.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of upgrading the machines and the radiation-protection training on ionizing radiation exposure during venous port system implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive venous port implantations between 2019 and 2022. The older fluoroscopy machines were replaced by two new machines. A first training session about health worker radioprotection was organized. The medical staff completed a second training course focused on protecting patients from ionizing radiation. We defined four distinct time intervals (TI): venous port implantations performed with the old equipment, the new fluoroscopy machines, after the first training course, and after the second training course. The air kerma-area product (KAP) was compared between these four TI and fluoroscopy times and the number of exposures only with the new machines.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2587 procedures. A 93% decrease in the median KAP between the first and last TI was noted (median KAP = 323.0 mGy.cm2 vs. 24.0 mGy.cm2, p < 0.0001). A decrease in the KAP was observed for each of the 11 anesthetists. We also noted a significant decrease in the time of fluoroscopy and the number of exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrading the fluoroscopy equipment and completing two dedicated training courses allowed for a drastic decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation during venous access port implantation by non-radiologist practitioners.