Dose and elasticity of demand for self-administered cocaine in rats

Pharmacological mechanisms underlying the efficacy of antibodies generated by a vaccine to treat oxycodone use disorder

Therapeutic vaccines offer a viable strategy to treat opioid use disorders (OUD) complementary to current pharmacotherapies. The candidate Oxy(Gly)₄-sKLH vaccine targeting oxycodone displayed pre-clinical proof of efficacy, selectivity and safety, and it is now undergoing clinical evaluation. To further support its implementation in the clinic, this study tested critical in vivo neuropsychopharmacological properties of the Oxy(Gly)₄-sKLH vaccine in rats. While repeated immunizations with Oxy(Gly)₄-sKLH were necessary to maintain the antibody response overtime, exposure to free oxycodone did not boost oxycodone-specific antibody levels in vaccinated rats, limiting concerns of immune-related side effects. Immunization with Oxy(Gly)₄-sKLH achieved sustained antibody titers over a period of five months following initial vaccination, supporting its potential for providing long-lasting protection. In vivo studies of selectivity showed that vaccination prevented oxycodone-induced but not methadone-induced antinociception, while still preserving the opioid antagonist naloxone's pharmacological effects. Vaccination did not interfere with fentanyl-induced antinociception or fentanyl distribution to the brain. These in vivo data confirm the previously reported in vitro selectivity profile of Oxy(Gly)₄-sKLH. Vaccination extended oxycodone's half-life up to 25 h compared to control. While vaccination reduced the reinforcing efficacy of oxycodone in an intravenous self-administration model, signs of toxicity were not observed. These rodent studies confirm that active immunization with Oxy(Gly)₄-sKLH induces highly specific and long-lasting antibodies which are effective in decreasing the reinforcing effects of oxycodone while preserving the efficacy of medications used to treat OUD and overdose.

Opening the cocaine economy by providing within-session access to a cheaper source of cocaine makes demand for it more elastic

Previous studies found that opening the cocaine economy by providing postsession access to cocaine had no effect on animals' demand for cocaine, whereas postsession access to saccharin or food made demand for these nondrug reinforcers more elastic. It is possible that there was no effect of economy type on cocaine taking in these earlier studies because of the delay to the postsession cocaine in the open economy. The present experiment tested whether forming an open economy by providing additional within-session cocaine, rather than postsession cocaine, would make rats' demand for cocaine more elastic. Saccharin was used as a nondrug comparison reinforcer. Three groups of rats pressed one lever for cocaine and one for saccharin on an ascending series of fixed ratio (FR) schedules where the number of responses required per reinforcer increased from 1 to 48 over sessions. In the open cocaine and open saccharin economy groups, rats had occasional access during the session to a third lever where cocaine or saccharin reinforcers, respectively, were always available on an FR-1 schedule. The main finding was that demand for cocaine was more elastic in the open cocaine economy group than in either of the other groups. Demand for saccharin was more elastic in the open saccharin economy group than in the open cocaine economy group. This study shows that cocaine taking is sensitive to economy type when the additional source of cocaine in an open economy is available close in time to when rats work for cocaine.

Behavioral economics of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats

There are sex differences in the development of cocaine addiction. For example, the time that it takes for women from initial use to addiction is significantly shorter than for men. Thus, understanding why females are more vulnerable to cocaine addiction will provide insights into sex differences in the mechanisms underlying cocaine addiction. This study aimed to determine how cocaine demand intensity and elasticity might differ between sexes. In addition, the impact of estrous cycle and cocaine intake on demand was investigated. Male and female rats were trained to self-administer 0.125 mg of cocaine intravenously under a chained schedule in daily 2-h sessions for 2 weeks, and then, the cocaine demand function was determined with a modified within-session threshold procedure. Following the test, the rats began to self-administer a higher dose of cocaine (0.25 mg) to increase the cocaine intake. The demand function was then similarly determined in the same rats after 2 weeks of cocaine self-administration of the higher dose. No sex differences were found in either demand intensity or elasticity. Neither did the level of cocaine intake have an impact on demand. The demand elasticity, but not intensity, was significantly lower during proestrus/estrus compared with diestrus. These data suggest that the faster transition to cocaine addiction in women cannot be explained by sex differences in the demand for cocaine and such a demand may change during different phases of estrus cycle.

Evaluation of Sex Differences in the Elasticity of Demand for Nicotine and Food in Rats

INTRODUCTION

Animal studies can inform policy regarding nicotine levels in tobacco products and e-cigarette solutions. Increasing the price of nicotine-containing products decreases their use, but it is unknown how the relationship between price and consumption is affected by both sex and nicotine dose.

METHODS

A behavioral economics procedure was used to determine the demand elasticity for nicotine in male and female rats. Demand elasticity describes the relationship between price and consumption. A high level of elasticity indicates that consumption is relatively sensitive to increases in price. The rats self-administered a low dose (0.01 mg/kg/inf) or a standard dose (0.03 mg/kg/inf) of nicotine for 9 days under a fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule. Then the price (FR schedule) of nicotine was increased, and a demand analysis was conducted. A similar study was conducted with palatable food pellets.

RESULTS

There were no sex differences in nicotine or food intake under the FR1 schedule. However, demand for 0.03 mg/kg/inf of nicotine was more elastic in females than males. Demand for 0.01 mg/kg/inf of nicotine and food was more elastic in males than females.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that there are no differences in nicotine and food intake between males and females when the price is low. When the price of nicotine or food is increased, males maintain their old level of intake longer than females when they have access to a standard dose of nicotine, and females maintain their intake longer when they have access to a low dose of nicotine or food.

IMPLICATIONS

This behavioral economics analysis indicates that there is no sex difference in nicotine intake when the price of nicotine is low. Increasing the price of nicotine decreases nicotine intake in a dose- and sex-specific manner. Males maintain their old level of intake longer when they have access to a standard dose of nicotine and females when they have access to a low dose. This has implications for tobacco regulatory policy. In a regulatory environment where only low nicotine-containing products are allowed, increasing the price of nicotine products may lead to a greater decrease in nicotine use in males than females.

A behavioral economic analysis of the effects of rimcazole on reinforcing effects of cocaine injection and food presentation in rats

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Rimcazole, a σ-receptor antagonist with affinity for the dopamine transporter (DAT), decreases rates of cocaine self-administration at doses lower than those that affect food-reinforced responding. As response rates are multiply determined, behavioral-economic analyses were used to provide measures of the reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine and food after rimcazole treatment. Further, effects of combinations of the DAT inhibitor, methylphenidate, and σ-receptor antagonists (BD1008, BD1063) were compared to those of rimcazole to assess mechanism of rimcazole effects.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to lever press with food reinforcement (one or three 20-mg sucrose pellets) or cocaine injection (0.1 or 0.32 mg/kg) under fixed-ratio (FR) 5-response schedules. Drugs or vehicle were administered (i.p.) 5-min before sessions in which FR value was increased from 5 to 80. Economic demand functions were generated from effects of FR value (price) on intake (consumption), with the parameters of demand, consumption at no cost (Q₀) and sensitivity to price (essential value, EV), derived.

RESULTS

Rimcazole dose-dependently decreased Q₀ and EV at both cocaine doses/injection. In contrast, rimcazole had no effect on these parameters at either food amount. Combinations of methylphenidate and the σ-receptor antagonists decreased Q₀ at the lower cocaine dose/injection but had no effect on EV; these treatments were ineffective on both economic parameters at the higher cocaine dose/injection and at either food amount.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the drug combinations only replicated rimcazole's effects incompletely, the present results suggest a specific decrease in the reinforcing effects of cocaine due to dual DAT σ-receptor blockade.

The effect of nicotine pre-exposure on demand for cocaine and sucrose in male rats

The aim of the present study was to determine how nicotine pre-exposure affects the elasticity of demand for intravenous cocaine and for sucrose pellets in adult male rats. In Experiment 1, demand for cocaine was assessed in rats that had nicotine in their drinking water. Nicotine pre-exposure significantly decreased rats' willingness to defend cocaine consumption as the price (measured as the number of responses per cocaine infusion) increased compared with a control group with no nicotine pre-exposure. That is, nicotine increased the elasticity of demand for cocaine infusions. Experiment 2 repeated the first experiment, but with rats working for sucrose pellets instead of cocaine. Nicotine pre-exposure had no effect on the elasticity of demand for sucrose. This pattern of results suggests that nicotine pre-exposure can reduce the reinforcing effects of cocaine, but not sucrose, in adult male rats.

Behavioral economic analysis of the effects of N-substituted benztropine analogs on cocaine self-administration in rats

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Benztropine (BZT) analogs and other atypical dopamine uptake inhibitors selectively decrease cocaine self-administration at doses that do not affect responding maintained by other reinforcers. Those effects were further characterized in the current study using a behavioral economic assessment of how response requirement (price) affects reinforcers obtained (consumption) in rats.

METHODS

Two groups of rats were trained to press levers with food (45-mg pellet) or cocaine (0.32 mg/kg/injection) reinforcement under fixed-ratio (FR) 5-response schedules. In selected sessions, the FR requirement was increased (5-80) during successive 20-min components to determine demand curves, which plot consumption against price. An exponential function was fitted to the data to derive the consumption at zero price (Q ₀) and the rate of decrease in consumption (essential value, EV) with increased price. The BZT analogs, AHN1-055, AHN2-005, JHW007 (3.2-10 or 17.8 mg/kg, each), vehicle, or comparison drugs (methylphenidate, ketamine), were administered i.p. before selected demand-curve determinations.

RESULTS

Consumption of cocaine or food decreased with increased FR requirement. Each drug shifted the demand curve rightward at the lowest doses and leftward/downward at higher doses. The effects on EV and Q ₀ were greater for cocaine than for food-reinforced responding. Additionally, the effects of the BZT analogs on EV and Q ₀ were greater than those obtained with a standard dopamine transport inhibitor, methylphenidate, and the NMDA antagonist, ketamine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, each). With these latter drugs, the demand-curve parameters were affected similarly with cocaine and food-maintained responding.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings, obtained using a behavioral economic assessment, suggest that BZT analogs selectively decrease the reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine.

Heroin and saccharin demand and preference in rats

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies have investigated the choice between heroin and a non-drug alternative reinforcer in rats. A common finding in these studies is that there are large individual differences in preference, with some rats preferring heroin and some preferring the non-drug alternative. The primary goal of the present study was to determine whether individual differences in how heroin or saccharin is valued, based on demand analysis, predicts choice.

METHODS

Rats lever-pressed for heroin infusions and saccharin reinforcers on fixed-ratio schedules. The essential value of each reinforcer was obtained from resulting demand curves. Rats were then trained on a mutually exclusive choice procedure where pressing one lever resulted in heroin and pressing another resulted in saccharin. After seven sessions of increased access to heroin or saccharin, rats were reexposed to the demand and choice procedures.

RESULTS

Demand for heroin was more elastic than demand for saccharin (i.e., heroin had lower essential value than saccharin). When allowed to choose, most rats preferred saccharin. The essential value of heroin, but not saccharin, predicted preference. The essential value of both heroin and saccharin increased following a week of increased access to heroin, but similar saccharin exposure had no effect on essential value. Preference was unchanged after increased access to either reinforcer.

CONCLUSION

Heroin-preferring rats differed from saccharin-preferring rats in how they valued heroin, but not saccharin. To the extent that choice models addiction-related behavior, these results suggest that overvaluation of opioids specifically, rather than undervaluation of non-drug alternatives, could identify susceptible individuals.