Apparent Elevation of Cyclosporine Whole Blood Concentrations in a Renal Allograft Recipient

Effects of Broad Spectrum Antibiotics on Measurement of Immunosuppressant Drugs

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics used parenterally can affect blood drug level measurements, as measured in diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of six different antibiotics commonly used in intensive care units on tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A levels measured by mass spectrometry.

METHODS

Ampicillin + sulbactam (AB1, IV, 1 g), imipenem + cilastatin sodium (AB2, IV, 500 mg), piperacillin + tazobactam (AB3, 4.5 g, IV), ertapenem (AB4, IV, 1 g), meropenem trihydrate (AB5, 500 mg, IV) and ceftriaxone (AB6, 1 g, IV) antibiotics were used for the interference assay. Measurements were performed on the Shimadzu 8045 (Japan) LC-MS/MS instrument. Bias values were calculated.

RESULTS

The least affected immunosuppressant was cyclosporine A (between -6.88% and 3.40%). The most affected were everolimus and sirolimus. Ertapenem caused negative interference on the level of everolimus at the rate of -27.34% and sirolimus at the rate of -26.79%. Piperacillin + tazobactam and imipenem + cilastatin sodium caused positive interferences on sirolimus at the rate of 24.24% and 22.73%, respectively. Ampicillin + sulbactam, meropenem trihydrate and ceftriaxone affected the sirolimus levels at lower rates (-4.49%, 5.93% and 9.86%). Everolimus levels deviated at the rate of -11.21% to -16.99% due to imipenem + cilastatin sodium, meropenem trihydrate and ceftriaxone.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the potential of antibiotic use affecting immunosuppressant levels. Antibiotic interference, especially in transplant patients, may cause erroneous immunosuppression, increasing the likelihood of rejection.

False Immunosuppressant Measurement by LC-MS/MS Method Due to Radiopaque Agents

BACKGROUND

Although liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is preferred as a reliable method, some molecules in the blood matrix may lead to false positive or false negative results. False positive or negative results show the direction of the deviation rate from the target value.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of seven different radiopaque agents on four immunosuppressant drugs.

METHODS

Every agent coded with RM1 to RM7 was added to control materials containing tacrolimus, everolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine A drugs. Measurements were performed using an LC-MS/MS instrument. Bias values were calculated to detect the deviation rates.

RESULTS

All RMs led to false negative results in the tacrolimus and cyclosporine A levels at a rate of -19.77% (95% CI, -27.16 to 12.52) to -44.45% (95% CI, -49.20 to -39.69). The smallest deviations were seen in the everolimus levels with the administration of RM6 (gadodiamide) and in the sirolimus levels with RM1 (gadobutrol) at the rates of 4.04% (95% CI, -11.36 to -3.17) and 2.11% (95% CI, -7.18 to 7.11), respectively. The most affected drug by RM4 (gadopentetate dimeglumine salt) was sirolimus at the rate of 114.01% (95% CI, 97.31 - 130.76). RM5 (gadodiamide) interfered cyclosporine A at the most. The highest deviations were observed with the administration of RM3 (iohexol) in the everolimus and sirolimus levels at the rates of 153.72% (95% CI, 142.44 to 164.78) and 171.41% (95% CI, 157.91 to 184.97), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiopaque agents interfered the measurement of immunosuppressant drugs. Especially, everolimus and sirolimus levels were affected due to using iohexol. The choice of gadodiamide or ioversol is important to reduce the risk of interference for everolimus measurement. The blood samples should be obtained for measurement of drug levels before contrast-enhanced imaging.

Immunologic Monitoring to Personalize Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant

Although immunosuppressive drugs have enhanced patient outcomes in transplantation, the liver transplant community has made significant research efforts into the discovery of more accurate and precise methods of posttransplant monitoring and diagnosing. Current research in biomarkers reveals many promising approaches.

False tacrolimus concentrations measured by antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay in liver transplant patient: 2 case reports and literature review

Safe use of tacrolimus relies on regular whole-blood drug monitoring. Of the methods used to assess whole-blood tacrolimus concentration, antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay is mostly used for therapeutic drug monitoring because it requires only a minimal sample preparation and no pretreatment procedure. However, several cases recently have been reported in which abnormally false elevated tacrolimus concentrations were measured by antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (>15 ng/mL), despite the absence of clinical symptoms. We present 2 cases of falsely detected tacrolimus concentrations that did not show abnormally high values within the therapeutic range. Whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations obtained by antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay showed well-controlled concentrations (approximately 2-8 ng/mL), whereas those obtained by another immunoassay and in washed erythrocytes were below the assay range (< 1.2 ng/mL). Thus, antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay can elicit falsely positive results of tacrolimus concentrations, even though they are within the therapeutic range.

Impact of interferences including metabolite crossreactivity on therapeutic drug monitoring results

Therapeutic drug monitoring is an integral part of services offered by toxicology laboratories because certain drugs require routine monitoring for dosage adjustment to achieve optimal therapeutic response and avoid adverse drug reactions. Immunoassays are widely used for therapeutic drug monitoring. However, immunoassays suffer from interferences from both exogenous and endogenous compounds including metabolites of the parent drug. Digoxin immunoassays are affected more commonly than any other immunoassays used for therapeutic drug monitoring. Digoxin immunoassays are affected by endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances and exogenous compounds such as various drugs, certain herbal supplements, and Digibind. Carbamazepine is metabolized to carbamazepine 10, 11-epoxide, and the crossreactivity of this metabolite with carbamazepine immunoassay may vary from 0% to 94%. Immunoassays used for measuring concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants are affected by tricyclic antidepressant metabolites and by a number of other drugs. Immunoassays for immunosuppressants are also subjected to significant interferences from metabolites, and liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry is recommended for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants. However, liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry may also suffer from interferences, for example, due to ion suppression or from isobaric ions.

Comparison of Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Measurement of Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus in Whole Blood

The aim of this work is to compare the results of a commercially available liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method in a clinical pathology laboratory for routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tacr) in pediatric patients with those obtained with the current antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA). Whole blood levels of CsA (n= 135) and Tacr (n=100) were sequentially analyzed by using ACMIA and LC-MS/MS on pediatric transplanted patients. The differences were analyzed by using the Passing Bablok regression analysis and the Bland and Altman test. The LC-MS/MS method showed excellent reproducibility and lower limits of quantification compared to the ACMIA. A linear relationship between ACMIA and LC-MS/MS was obtained for both CsA (r= 0.9449; P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.9234 to 0.9605) and Tacr (r=0.9275; P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.8941 to 0.9506). No significant inter-method biases were observed. The analytical performances of the LC-MS/MS method make it suitable for the accurate measurement of CsA and Tacr in pediatric transplanted patients. However ACMIA results are also accurate and reliable. For this reason the choice of the method to be used in a routine clinical pathology laboratory can be made on the bases of non-analytical considerations such as costs, organization, availability of skilled personnel.