Local Cooling as a Step of Treatment for Tissue Ischemia Caused by Hyaluronic Acid Injection-induced Embolism-A Report of 9 Cases

Conventional High-Dose vs Low-Dose Hyaluronidase for Skin Necrosis after Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Systematic Review and Pilot Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronidase remains the mainstay treatment for skin necrosis due to vascular occlusion after hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers. There is wide variability in protocols for the administration of hyaluronidase. Most protocols, however, lack strong evidence regarding hyaluronidase dosages.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and pilot meta-analysis, searching four international databases from inception until December 2023 for clinical studies reporting on two or more patients receiving hyaluronidase for skin necrosis after hyaluronic acid fillers. Random-effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the pooled proportion of complete scar resolution. We rated intra-study risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

We included 15 studies totaling 223 patients. The pooled proportion of complete scar resolution after hyaluronidase administration was 77.8% (95%-CI: 65.5% to 86.6%, pegger = 0.093, low certainty). Patients treated with high doses of hyaluronidase (>500 international units [IUs]) had lower rates of resolution of 69.6% (95%-CI: 41.2% to 88.3%) compared to those treated with low doses (500IU or less) that had 88.1% rate of resolution (95%-CI: 86.0% to 96.2%), though not statistically significant (p= 0.18). The use of adjunct therapies did not have a statistically significant effect on outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A higher proportion of patients receiving low doses (500IU or less) (88.1%) had complete scar resolution compared to patients receiving high doses (69.7%), though not statistically significant (p=0.18). Future studies should provide more granular details on their protocols to benefit the formulation of evidence-based guidelines in future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

CRD42024538661.

Patterns of Filler-Induced Facial Skin Ischemia: A Systematic Review of 243 Cases and Introduction of the FOEM Scoring System and Grading Scale

BACKGROUND

The incidence of facial skin necrosis has increased considerably because of the growth in the popularity of dermal fillers. This study describes the patterns and severity of facial skin ischemia, along with associated neuro-ophthalmologic injuries, in the published literature through the introduction of the facial artery, ophthalmic artery, distal external carotid artery, internal maxillary artery (FOEM) facial angiosome scoring system and grading scale.

METHODS

A systematic review of all photographic cases of facial skin ischemia attributable to vascular occlusion with dermal fillers and injectable materials was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 243 cases were identified, with 738 digital clinical photographs retrieved. The facial artery (58% of cases) and ophthalmic artery (48% of cases) angiosomes were most commonly affected. The frontonasal and angulonasal territories were the most common facial skin segments injured by filler-induced vascular occlusion. Cutaneous involvement of the ophthalmic angiosome was significantly associated with neuro-ophthalmologic complications [vision loss, 39% versus 0.8% ( P = 0.00001); stroke, 8% versus 0.8% ( P = 0.0085)]. Injuries with greater cutaneous surface area or cross-angiosome involvement were associated with a higher incidence of severe visual deficits and bilateral stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial skin necrosis attributable to vascular occlusion is a rapidly growing problem that has remained poorly characterized in the literature. This study provides the largest descriptive analysis of published photographic reports of skin ischemia to date and proposes a novel scoring system and grading classification to aid in future reporting.

Early warm compress treatment can promote recanalization of vascular embolisms and reduce tissue necrosis after polymethyl methacrylate injection

Injection of fillers for soft tissue augmentation can lead to a variety of complications, among which vascular occlusion caused by intravascular injection of filler will induce severe or permanent damage. The treatment strategies for intravascular embolization caused by injection include warm compress application, but the exact beneficial effects of this therapy have not been confirmed. The purpose of this study is to construct an intravascular injection embolism model and observe the effectiveness of warm and cold compress through a randomized, controlled trial. Thirty rabbit's sixty ears were randomly divided into warm compress group, cold compress group, and control group. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was slowly injected into the central ear artery (CEA) to cause vascular embolism. Warm compress and cold compress treatment were performed respectively. The vascular recanalization and other related indexes were observed at 30 min, 1 day, and 7 days after injection, and the tissue necrosis was analyzed at 7 days. In the early stage of vascular embolization, warm compress can immediately promote vascular dilatation, blood circulation and partial blood flow recovery. One day after intravascular injection, warm compress can reduce intravascular embolization and reduce the incidence of tissue necrosis. At 7 days after intravascular injection, the vessels in the cold compress and control groups were still embolized while the percentage of recanalization in the warm compress group was 47.4% (P < 0.000). Early-stage warm compress after intravascular PMMA injection is conducive to recanalization of vascular embolization and reducing tissue necrosis.

Use of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase protocol in the management of impending skin necrosis associated with hyaluronic acid fillers: a systematic review

Impending skin necrosis resulting from inadvertent intravascular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers can lead to tissue loss and significant scarring. In recent years, management trends have shifted from multimodal approaches to the sole use of high doses of hyaluronidase. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase management protocol in preventing skin necrosis and possible subsequent scarring. An online search of the bibliographic databases PubMed and Embase yielded 3039 articles. A total of 72 studies reporting 186 cases were found to be eligible for inclusion. The selection and evaluation process was done according to the PRISMA criteria. Included studies were assessed using the JBI and STROBE critical appraisal tools. The analysis of treatment outcomes was done according to the timing of treatment initiation and the type of intervention used. This review found that an immediate intervention using the high-dose pulsed hyaluronidase management protocol provided predictable and satisfactory outcomes. Initiating the protocol within 24 h of filler injection halted the progression of necrosis and prevented permanent sequelae. The conclusions are limited by the lack of a high level of evidence, since the only available sources of data are case reports and case series.

Treatment Algorithm for Hyaluronic Acid-Related Complication Based on a Systematic Review of Case Reports, Case Series, and Clinical Experience

Study Design

Systematic review of hyaluronic acid (HA)-related complications.

Objective

To systematically review all available literature including case reports and case series to identify a pattern for the management of vascular compromise resulting in facial skin ischemia and ocular manifestations following HA injection.

Methods

This review was based on a systematic search of 3 electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus for all available literature including case series and case reports from database inception to July 2019. Only a total of 52 case reports/series were eligible for review and included 107 patients.

Results

The reviewed literature available was comprised from case reports/series and indicated that management of both impending skin necrosis and visual disturbances is variable with no repetitive pattern of action. Yet, successful management is time dependent as early interventions stopped progression and, in some cases, even reversed adverse effects.

Conclusion

Results found no universal protocol for achieving optimal results for adverse effects and as such, we present a step-by-step algorithm for the emergency management of complications following HA injection.