1
|
Grosu-Bularda A, Vancea CV, Hodea FV, Cretu A, Bordeanu-Diaconescu EM, Dumitru CS, Ratoiu VA, Teodoreanu RN, Lascar I, Hariga CS. Optimizing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Surgical Techniques, Biomolecular and Regenerative Strategies-A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:3895. [PMID: 40332790 PMCID: PMC12027958 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26083895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2025] [Revised: 04/09/2025] [Accepted: 04/18/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injury disrupts the function of the peripheral nervous system, leading to sensory, motor, and autonomic deficits. While peripheral nerves possess an intrinsic regenerative capacity, complete sensory and motor recovery remains challenging due to the unpredictable nature of the healing process, which is influenced by the extent of the injury, age, and timely intervention. Recent advances in microsurgical techniques, imaging technologies, and a deeper understanding of nerve microanatomy have enhanced functional outcomes in nerve repair. Nerve injury initiates complex pathophysiological responses, including Wallerian degeneration, macrophage activation, Schwann cell dedifferentiation, and axonal sprouting. Complete nerve disruptions require surgical intervention to restore nerve continuity and function. Direct nerve repair is the gold standard for clean transections with minimal nerve gaps. However, in cases with larger nerve gaps or when direct repair is not feasible, alternatives such as autologous nerve grafting, vascularized nerve grafts, nerve conduits, allografts, and nerve transfers may be employed. Autologous nerve grafts provide excellent biocompatibility but are limited by donor site morbidity and availability. Vascularized grafts are used for large nerve gaps and poorly vascularized recipient beds, while nerve conduits serve as a promising solution for smaller gaps. Nerve transfers are utilized when neither direct repair nor grafting is possible, often involving re-routing intact regional nerves to restore function. Nerve conduits play a pivotal role in nerve regeneration by bridging nerve gaps, with significant advancements made in material composition and design. Emerging trends in nerve regeneration include the use of 3D bioprinting for personalized conduits, gene therapy for targeted growth factor delivery, and nanotechnology for nanofiber-based conduits and stem cell therapy. Advancements in molecular sciences have provided critical insights into the cellular and biochemical mechanisms underlying nerve repair, leading to targeted therapies that enhance axonal regeneration, remyelination, and functional recovery in peripheral nerve injuries. This review explores the current strategies for the therapeutic management of peripheral nerve injuries, highlighting their indications, benefits, and limitations, while emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on injury severity and patient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea Grosu-Bularda
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristian-Vladimir Vancea
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Florin-Vlad Hodea
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei Cretu
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Eliza-Maria Bordeanu-Diaconescu
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catalina-Stefania Dumitru
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vladut-Alin Ratoiu
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Razvan-Nicolae Teodoreanu
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioan Lascar
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristian-Sorin Hariga
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park J, Kim MY, Yoon HY. Comparison of five preservation methods for fascia allograft. J Vet Sci 2025; 26:e13. [PMID: 40183903 PMCID: PMC11972942 DOI: 10.4142/jvs.24276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Research on tissue preservation, including cortical bone, skin, nerves, and vessels in glycerol and cortical bone in honey, has shown positive results. On the other hand, relatively few studies have been performed on fascia preservation, and comparisons between different fascia preservation methods remain scarce. OBJECTIVE This in vitro study compared the biomechanical properties of five different methods of preserving fascia lata. METHODS The control group underwent biomechanical testing immediately after decellularization, while the other five groups were stored in glycerol, honey, deep freezer, lyophilizer, and liquid nitrogen for 30 days. The ultimate load, elongation at failure, and stiffness for each group were determined from a load-elongation curve. RESULTS A comparison of the ultimate load showed that the control group had the highest value, followed by the glycerol group. The glycerol group was the only group that did not show a significant difference from the control group, while all the other groups showed a significantly lower ultimate load. A comparison of elongation at failure revealed the glycerol group to have the highest value at failure among all groups and was significantly higher than the deep freeze, honey, and cryopreservation groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Glycerol can be used as an effective method for preserving fascia allografts because the resulting allografts show a similar ultimate load to the control group and the highest mean elongation at failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyoung Park
- Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
| | - Mu-Young Kim
- Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| | - Hun-Young Yoon
- Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
- KU Center for Animal Blood Medical Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Broeren BO, Hundepool CA, Kumas AH, Duraku LS, Walbeehm ET, Hooijmans CR, Power DM, Zuidam JM, De Jong T. The effectiveness of acellular nerve allografts compared to autografts in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0279324. [PMID: 38295088 PMCID: PMC10829984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of nerve injuries proves to be a worldwide clinical challenge. Acellular nerve allografts are suggested to be a promising alternative for bridging a nerve gap to the current gold standard, an autologous nerve graft. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the efficacy of the acellular nerve allograft, its difference from the gold standard (the nerve autograft) and to discuss its possible indications. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched until the 4th of January 2022. Original peer reviewed paper that presented 1) distinctive data; 2) a clear comparison between not immunologically processed acellular allografts and autologous nerve transfers; 3) was performed in laboratory animals of all species and sex. Meta analyses and subgroup analyses (for graft length and species) were conducted for muscle weight, sciatic function index, ankle angle, nerve conduction velocity, axon count diameter, tetanic contraction and amplitude using a Random effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted on graft length and species. RESULTS Fifty articles were included in this review and all were included in the meta-analyses. An acellular allograft resulted in a significantly lower muscle weight, sciatic function index, ankle angle, nerve conduction velocity, axon count and smaller diameter, tetanic contraction compared to an autologous nerve graft. No difference was found in amplitude between acellular allografts and autologous nerve transfers. Post hoc subgroup analyses of graft length showed a significant reduced muscle weight in long grafts versus small and medium length grafts. All included studies showed a large variance in methodological design. CONCLUSION Our review shows that the included studies, investigating the use of acellular allografts, showed a large variance in methodological design and are as a consequence difficult to compare. Nevertheless, our results indicate that treating a nerve gap with an allograft results in an inferior nerve recovery compared to an autograft in seven out of eight outcomes assessed in experimental animals. In addition, based on our preliminary post hoc subgroup analyses we suggest that when an allograft is being used an allograft in short and medium (0-1cm, > 1-2cm) nerve gaps is preferred over an allograft in long (> 2cm) nerve gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berend O. Broeren
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline A. Hundepool
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ali H. Kumas
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Liron S. Duraku
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik T. Walbeehm
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Haga Hospital and Xpert Clinic, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn R. Hooijmans
- Department for Health Evidence Unit SYRCLE, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care (Meta Research Team), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dominic M. Power
- Department of Hand & Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J. Michiel Zuidam
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim De Jong
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahdian M, Tabatabai TS, Abpeikar Z, Rezakhani L, Khazaei M. Nerve regeneration using decellularized tissues: challenges and opportunities. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1295563. [PMID: 37928728 PMCID: PMC10620322 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1295563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In tissue engineering, the decellularization of organs and tissues as a biological scaffold plays a critical role in the repair of neurodegenerative diseases. Various protocols for cell removal can distinguish the effects of treatment ability, tissue structure, and extracellular matrix (ECM) ability. Despite considerable progress in nerve regeneration and functional recovery, the slow regeneration and recovery potential of the central nervous system (CNS) remains a challenge. The success of neural tissue engineering is primarily influenced by composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties. The primary objective of restorative techniques is to guide existing axons properly toward the distal end of the damaged nerve and the target organs. However, due to the limitations of nerve autografts, researchers are seeking alternative methods with high therapeutic efficiency and without the limitations of autograft transplantation. Decellularization scaffolds, due to their lack of immunogenicity and the preservation of essential factors in the ECM and high angiogenic ability, provide a suitable three-dimensional (3D) substrate for the adhesion and growth of axons being repaired toward the target organs. This study focuses on mentioning the types of scaffolds used in nerve regeneration, and the methods of tissue decellularization, and specifically explores the use of decellularized nerve tissues (DNT) for nerve transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Mahdian
- Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Tayebeh Sadat Tabatabai
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
| | - Zahra Abpeikar
- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
| | - Leila Rezakhani
- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Mozafar Khazaei
- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| |
Collapse
|