1
|
Dong Y, Xu Z, Dai XF, Chen LW, Lin ZQ. Clinical Outcomes and Left Ventricular Functional Remodeling after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study of 76 Cases. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2024; 25:317. [PMID: 39355578 PMCID: PMC11440416 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2509317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is a common condition that leads to left ventricular (LV) functional remodeling and poor prognosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide temporary circulatory support and facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ICM and hemodynamic instability. However, the impact of ECMO-assisted PCI on LV functional remodeling and clinical outcomes in ICM patients is unclear. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with ICM who underwent ECMO-assisted PCI at our institution between January 2013 and December 2022. We assessed the changes in LV functional remodeling using echocardiography at baseline and 12 months after the procedure. We also evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and ECMO-related complications during hospitalization and at one-year follow-up. Results The mean baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 29.98 ± 2.65%. The rate of complete revascularization was 58%. The median duration of ECMO support was 38.99 hours. The most common ECMO-related complications were bleeding (8%) and lower extremity ischemia (5%). The one-year mortality rate was 30%. The overall freedom from MACCEs at 12 months was 59% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49-71%). LVEF increased significantly after the procedure from baseline to 6 months, yet decreased slightly at 12 months, although it was still higher than the baseline value. Wall motion score index (WMSI), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) decreased significantly from baseline to 12 months, indicating an improvement in LV function and a reduction in LV size. Conclusions In a high-volume tertiary center with extensive experience in advanced heart failure therapies and a dedicated ECMO team, ECMO-assisted PCI demonstrated feasibility and safety in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the rate of complete revascularization was modest at 58%. Despite the high-risk profile of the patients, ECMO-assisted PCI was associated with a significant improvement in LV functional remodeling and a favorable 12-month survival rate. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to identify the optimal patient and device selection criteria for ECMO-assisted PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Dong
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province University, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province University, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiao-Fu Dai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province University, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Liang-Wan Chen
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province University, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhi-Qin Lin
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Province University, 350001 Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manning KA, Bowman J, Nakagawa S, Ouchi K. Common mistakes and evidence-based approaches in goals-of-care conversations for seriously ill older adults in cardiac care unit. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:629-633. [PMID: 38584492 PMCID: PMC11350430 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
For older adults with serious, life-limiting illnesses near the end of life, clinicians frequently face difficult decisions about the medical care they provide because of clinical uncertainty. This difficulty is further complicated by unique challenges and medical advancements for patients with advanced heart diseases. In this article, we describe common mistakes encountered by clinicians when having goals-of-care conversations (e.g. conversations between clinicians and seriously ill patients/surrogates to discuss patient's values and goals for clinical care near the end of life.). Then, we delineate an evidence-based approach in goals-of-care conversations and highlight the unique challenges around decision-making in the cardiac intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine A Manning
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Jason Bowman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston 02115, MA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shunichi Nakagawa
- Department of Medicine, Adult Palliative Care Services, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kei Ouchi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston 02115, MA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martínez León A, Bazal Chacón P, Herrador Galindo L, Ugarriza Ortueta J, Plaza Martín M, Pastor Pueyo P, Alonso Salinas GL. Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4841. [PMID: 39200983 PMCID: PMC11355768 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multifactorial clinical syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that could be associated with multisystem organ failure, presenting a diverse range of causes and symptoms. Despite improving survival in recent years due to new advancements, CS still carries a high risk of severe morbidity and mortality. Recent research has focused on improving early detection and understanding of CS through standardized team approaches, detailed hemodynamic assessment, and selective use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, leading to better patient outcomes. This review examines CS pathophysiology, emerging classifications, current drug and device therapies, standardized team management strategies, and regionalized care systems aimed at optimizing shock outcomes. Furthermore, we identify gaps in knowledge and outline future research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaia Martínez León
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Bazal Chacón
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Heath Sciences Department, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA-NUP), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lorena Herrador Galindo
- Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
| | - Julene Ugarriza Ortueta
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - María Plaza Martín
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Av Ramón y Cajal 3, 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| | - Pablo Pastor Pueyo
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Av Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, 25198 Lleida, Spain;
| | - Gonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Heath Sciences Department, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA-NUP), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schurr JW, Ambrosi L, Fitzgerald J, Bermudez C, Genuardi MV, Brahier M, Elliot T, McGowan K, Zaaqoq A, Laskar S, Pope SM, Givertz MM, Mallidi H, Sylvester KW, Seifert FC, McLarty AJ. Multicenter evaluation of left ventricular assist device implantation with or without ECMO bridge in cardiogenic shock. Artif Organs 2024; 48:921-931. [PMID: 38459758 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains unclear, and recipients of the more contemporary HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD are not well represented in previous studies. We therefore undertook a multicenter, retrospective study of this population. METHODS AND RESULTS INTERMACS 1 LVAD recipients from five U.S. centers were included. In-hospital and one-year outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was the overall mortality hazard comparing ECMO versus non-ECMO patients by propensity-weighted survival analysis. Secondary outcomes included survival by LVAD type, as well as postoperative and one-year outcomes. One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included; 24 received ECMO as a bridge to LVAD. Mortality was higher in patients bridged with ECMO in the primary analysis (HR 3.22 [95%CI 1.06-9.77], p = 0.039). Right ventricular assist device was more common in the ECMO group (ECMO: 54.2% vs non-ECMO: 11.7%, p < 0.001). Ischemic stroke was higher at one year in the ECMO group (ECMO: 25.0% vs non-ECMO: 4.9%, p = 0.006). Among the study cohort, one-year mortality was lower in HM3 than in HeartMate II (HMII) or HeartWare HVAD (10.5% vs 46.9% vs 31.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) recipients. Pump thrombosis at one year was lower in HM3 than in HMII or HVAD (1.8% vs 16.1% vs 16.2%, respectively; p = 0.026) recipients. CONCLUSIONS Higher mortality was observed with ECMO as a bridge to LVAD, likely due to higher acuity illness, yet acceptable one-year survival was seen compared with historical rates. The receipt of the HM3 was associated with improved survival compared with older generation devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Schurr
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lara Ambrosi
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jillian Fitzgerald
- Stony Brook University Hospital, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Christian Bermudez
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael V Genuardi
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Brahier
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tonya Elliot
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kevin McGowan
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Akram Zaaqoq
- UVA Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Sonjoy Laskar
- Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stuart M Pope
- Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael M Givertz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hari Mallidi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katelyn W Sylvester
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Frank C Seifert
- Stony Brook University Hospital, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Allison J McLarty
- Stony Brook University Hospital, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salazar L, Lorusso R. Protected cardiac surgery: strategic mechanical circulatory support to improve postcardiotomy mortality. Curr Opin Crit Care 2024; 30:385-391. [PMID: 38958182 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine the evolving landscape of cardiac surgery, focusing on the increasing complexity of patients and the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in managing perioperative low cardiac output syndrome (P-LCOS). RECENT FINDINGS P-LCOS is a significant predictor of mortality in cardiac surgery patients. Preoperative risk factors, such as cardiogenic shock and elevated lactate levels, can help identify those at higher risk. Proactive use of MCS, rather than reactive implementation after P-LCOS develops, may lead to improved outcomes by preventing severe organ hypoperfusion. The emerging concept of "protected cardiac surgery" emphasizes early identification of these high-risk patients and planned MCS utilization. Additionally, specific MCS strategies are being developed and refined for various cardiac conditions, including AMI-CS, valvular surgeries, and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. SUMMARY This paper explores the shifting demographics and complexities in cardiac surgery patients. It emphasizes the importance of proactive, multidisciplinary approaches to identify high-risk patients and implement early MCS to prevent P-LCOS and improve outcomes. The concept of protected cardiac surgery, involving planned MCS use and shared decision-making, is highlighted. The paper also discusses MCS strategies tailored to specific cardiac procedures and the ethical considerations surrounding MCS implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Salazar
- Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - Roberto Lorusso
- Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CAIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lamberti KK, Keller SP, Edelman ER. Dynamic load modulation predicts right heart tolerance of left ventricular cardiovascular assist in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock. Sci Transl Med 2024; 16:eadk4266. [PMID: 38354226 PMCID: PMC11461014 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adk4266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Ventricular assist devices (VADs) offer mechanical support for patients with cardiogenic shock by unloading the impaired ventricle and increasing cardiac outflow and subsequent tissue perfusion. Their ability to adjust ventricular assistance allows for rapid and safe dynamic changes in cardiac load, which can be used with direct measures of chamber pressures to quantify cardiac pathophysiologic state, predict response to interventions, and unmask vulnerabilities such as limitations of left-sided support efficacy due to intolerance of the right heart. We defined hemodynamic metrics in five pigs with dynamic peripheral transvalvular VAD (pVAD) support to the left ventricle. Metrics were obtained across a spectrum of disease states, including left ventricular ischemia induced by titrated microembolization of a coronary artery and right ventricular strain induced by titrated microembolization of the pulmonary arteries. A sweep of different pVAD speeds confirmed mechanisms of right heart decompensation after left-sided support and revealed intolerance. In contrast to the systemic circulation, pulmonary vascular compliance dominated in the right heart and defined the ability of the right heart to adapt to left-sided pVAD unloading. We developed a clinically accessible metric to measure pulmonary vascular compliance at different pVAD speeds that could predict right heart efficiency and tolerance to left-sided pVAD support. Findings in swine were validated with retrospective hemodynamic data from eight patients on pVAD support. This methodology and metric could be used to track right heart tolerance, predict decompensation before right heart failure, and guide titration of device speed and the need for biventricular support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly K. Lamberti
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Steven P. Keller
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MA 21205, USA
| | - Elazer R. Edelman
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Improving Survival in Cardiogenic Shock-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Impact of an Institutional Allocation Protocol to Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12111931. [PMID: 36431066 PMCID: PMC9692664 DOI: 10.3390/life12111931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) is a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock (CS), but many aspects such as patient selection, initiation threshold and optimal modality selection remain unclear. This study describes a standard operating procedure (SOP) for tMCS allocation for CS patients and presents outcome data before and after implementation. Data from 421 patients treated for CS with tMCS between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed. In 2019, we implemented a new SOP for allocating CS patients to tMCS modalities. The association between the time of SOP implementation and the 30-day and 1-year survival as well as hospital discharge was evaluated. Of the 421 patients included, 189 were treated before (pre-SOP group) and 232 after implementation of the new SOP (SOP group). Causes of CS included acute myocardial infarction (n = 80, 19.0%), acute-on-chronic heart failure in patients with dilated or chronic ischemic heart failure (n = 139, 33.0%), valvular cardiomyopathy (n = 14, 3.3%) and myocarditis (n = 5, 1.2%); 102 patients suffered from postcardiotomy CS (24.2%). The SOP group was further divided into an SOP-adherent (SOP-A) and a non-SOP-adherent group (SOP-NA). The hospital discharge rate was higher in the SOP group (41.7% vs. 29.7%), and treating patients according to the SOP was associated with an improved 30-day survival (56.9% vs. 38.9%, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01-4.80, p = 0.044). Patient allocation according to the presented SOP significantly improved 30-day survival.
Collapse
|
8
|
Soltesz A, Molnar ZA, Szakal-Toth Z, Tamaska E, Katona H, Fabry S, Csikos G, Berzsenyi V, Tamas C, Edes IF, Gal J, Merkely B, Nemeth E. Influence of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Integrated Hemoadsorption on the Early Reversal of Multiorgan and Microcirculatory Dysfunction and Outcome of Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11216517. [PMID: 36362744 PMCID: PMC9657372 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA−ECMO) integrated hemoadsorption on the reversal of multiorgan and microcirculatory dysfunction, and early mortality of refractory cardiogenic shock patients. Methods: Propensity score−matched cohort study of 29 pairs of patients. Subjects received either VA−ECMO supplemented with hemoadsorption or standard VA−ECMO management. Results: There was a lower mean sequential organ failure assessment score (p = 0.04), lactate concentration (p = 0.015), P(v−a)CO2 gap (p < 0.001), vasoactive inotropic score (p = 0.007), and reduced delta C−reactive protein level (p = 0.005) in the hemoadsorption compared to control groups after 72 h. In−hospital mortality was similar to the predictions in the control group (62.1%) and was much lower than the predicted value in the hemoadsorption group (44.8%). There were less ECMO-associated bleeding complications in the hemoadsorption group compared to controls (p = 0.049). Overall, 90-day survival was better in the hemoadsorption group than in controls without statistical significance. Conclusion: VA−ECMO integrated hemoadsorption treatment was associated with accelerated recovery of multiorgan and microcirculatory dysfunction, mitigated inflammatory response, less bleeding complications, and lower risk for early mortality in comparison with controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Soltesz
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsofia Anna Molnar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsofia Szakal-Toth
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Eszter Tamaska
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Hajna Katona
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Szabolcs Fabry
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gergely Csikos
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Viktor Berzsenyi
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csilla Tamas
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Istvan Ferenc Edes
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Janos Gal
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bela Merkely
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Endre Nemeth
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +36-1-4586810
| |
Collapse
|