Greater efficacy of aldosterone blockade and diuretic reinforcement vs. dual renin–angiotensin blockade for left ventricular mass regression in patients with resistant hypertension

Physician and patient adherence in hypertension trials: a point of view on an important issue to resolve

INTRODUCTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are important sources of evidence that strongly influence guidelines for patient management, including for elevated blood pressure in adults.

AREAS COVERED

Critical questions regarding the interpretation of hypertension trial results have recently increased, especially for concerns over methodology. In particular, investigator adherence to the protocol and patient adherence to investigational drugs are often far from optimal. These issues may be ignored or underreported because physicians' behavior during trials is often not monitored and patients' medication adherence is neither measured adequately nor reported or analyzed in the final report or in the publication. This situation may lead to misinterpretations of study results and misevaluations of the safety and efficacy profile of new drugs. In this short review, the problem of measuring, reporting, and analyzing drug adherence in RCTs is discussed and illustrated with several examples in the field of hypertension.

EXPERT OPINION

The main conclusion is that drug adherence should always be measured in clinical trials, possibly with more than one method. In addition, prespecified analyses of adherence data should be included in the statistical plan of all trials to improve their overall quality.

The impact of SGLT2 inhibition on imaging markers of cardiac function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) has resulted in significant benefits in patients with heart failure irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of SGLT2-Is on cardiac function indices.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search for studies assessing the changes in LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular mass index (LVMi), left atrial volume index (LAVi), and E/e' following the initiation of an SGLT2-I.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies with 2351 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibition resulted in a significant improvement of LVEF [MD 1.97 (95%CI 0.92, 3.02), p < .01, I2:84%] in patients with heart failure, an increase in GLS [MD 1.17 (95% CI 0.25, 2.10), p < .01], a decrease in LVESV [MD: -3.60 (95% CI -7.02, -0.18), p = .04, I2:9%] while the effect was neutral concerning LVEDV [MD: -3.10 (95% CI -6.76, 0.56), p = .40, I2:4%]. LVMi [MD: -3.99 (95% CI -7.16 to -0.82), p = .01, I2:65%], LAVi [MD: -1.77 (95% CI -2.97, -0.57), p < .01, I2:0%], and E/e' [MD: -1.39 (95% CI -2.04, -0.73), p < .01, I2:55%] were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with an improvement in markers of cardiac function, confirming the importance of SGLT2 inhibition towards the reversal of cardiac remodeling.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Improves Cardiac Structure in Type 2 Diabetes: Data From the MIRAD Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the impact of the MR antagonist (MRA) eplerenone on LVM in type 2 diabetes patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).

BACKGROUND

MRA activation is associated with cardiac fibrosis and increased left ventricular mass (LVM), which is an independent predictor of adverse CVD, including heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A prespecified analysis of secondary endpoints in a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial of 140 patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of or established CVD. Patients were randomized to receive high-dose eplerenone therapy (100 mg-200 mg) or placebo as an add-on to standard care for 26 weeks. Indexed LVM (LVMi) and T1 time were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Biomarkers included N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), pro-collagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and type III N-terminal propeptide (P3NP).

RESULTS

Of 140 patients in the MIRAD trial, 104 patients were subject to CMR imaging (eplerenone: 54 patients; placebo: 50 patients). Mean LVMi at baseline was 74.2 ± 16 g/m². The treatment effect (ie, between-group differences) was a decrease of 3.7 g/m² following the eplerenone treatment (95% CI: -6.7 to -0.7; P = 0.017), with a corresponding decrease in absolute LVM. Plasma NT-proBNP concentrations decreased by 22% (P = 0.017) using eplerenone compared with placebo, and P1NP decreased 3.3 ng/mL (P = 0.019). No differences in T1 times or P3NP concentrations were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of high-dose eplerenone in high-risk type 2 diabetes was associated with a clear reduction in LVMi and in NT-proBNP and P1NP levels, which may suggest a clinical benefit in heart failure prevention. (EU Clinical trials: Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Type 2 Diabetes [MIRAD]; 2015-002519-14).

Comparative efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with echocardiography in hypertensive patients: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. The lack of direct comparison between different antihypertensive drugs cannot evaluate the superiority-inferiority differentiation of different antihypertensive drugs in reversing LVH. Therefore, the objective of this protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols statement guidelines. Studies were identified through systematic searches in June 2021 with no restrictions on date and time, language, and publication status using the following bibliographic databases: Embase, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library. The risk of bias assessment of the included studies was performed by two authors independently using the tool recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0). All calculations were carried out with Stata 11.0 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom).

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesized that the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in antihypertensive therapy could achieve better efficacy in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients.

Comparative efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with echocardiography in hypertensive patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. However, there is no clear superiority-inferiority differentiation between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and diuretics in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients. To provide further evidence for choosing the optimal antihypertensive drug for improving LVH, we performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the Cochrane library database, Embase, and Pubmed, and identified 49 studies involving 5402 patients that were eligible for inclusion. It was found that ARB could improve LVH in hypertensive patients more effectively than CCB (MD -4.07, 95%CI -8.03 to -0.24) and BB (MD -4.57, 95%CI -8.07 to -1.12). Matched comparison of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) showed that the effect of ACEI in reducing left ventricular mass index (LVMi) was not effective as that of ARB (MD -3.72, 95%CI -7.52 to -0.11). The surface under the cumulative ranking for each intervention indicated that the use of ARB was more effective among the different types of antihypertensive drugs (97%). This network meta-analysis revealed that the use of ARB in antihypertensive therapy could achieve better efficacy in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients.

Sequential nephron blockade with combined diuretics improves diastolic function in patients with resistant hypertension

AIMS

Hypertension is a major contributor to cardiac diastolic dysfunction. Different therapeutics strategies have been proposed to control blood pressure (BP), but their independent impact on cardiac function remains undetermined. In patients with resistant hypertension, we compared the changes in cardiac parameters between two strategies based on sequential nephron blockade (NBD) with a combination of diuretics or sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade (RASB).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After a 4-week period where all patients received Irbesartan 300 mg/day + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day + amlodipine 5 mg/day, 140 resistant hypertension patients (54.8 ± 11.1 years, 76% men, mean duration with hypertension: 13.1 ± 10.5 years, no previous history of heart failure or current symptoms of congestive heart failure) were randomized 1:1 to the NBD regimen or to the RASB regimen at week 0 (W0, baseline). Treatment intensity was increased at week 4, 8, or 10 if home BP was ≥135/85 mmHg, by sequentially adding 25 mg spironolactone, 20-40 mg furosemide, and 5 mg amiloride (NBD group) or 5-10 mg ramipril and 5-10 mg bisoprolol (RASB group). No other antihypertensive drug was allowed during the study. BP, BNP levels, and echocardiographic parameters were assessed at weeks 0 and 12. The baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, and plasma hormones (BNP, renin, and aldosterone) and cardiac echocardiographic parameters did not significantly differ between the NBD and the RASB groups. Over 12 weeks, BNP levels significantly decreased in NBD but increased in RASB (mean [CI 95%] change in log-transformed BNP levels: -43% [-67%; -23%] vs. +55% [46%; 62%] in NBD vs. RASB, respectively, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the proportion of patients presenting ≥2 echocardiographic criteria of diastolic dysfunction decreased between baseline and W12 from 31% to 3% in NBD but increased from 19% to 32% in RASB (P = 0.0048). As compared with RASB, NBD induced greater decrease in ambulatory systolic BP (P < 0.0001), pulse pressure (P < 0.0001), and systemic vascular resistance (P < 0.005). In multivariable linear regression analyses, NBD treatment was significantly associated with decreased BNP levels (adjusted ß: -46.41 ± 6.99, P < 0.0001) independent of age, gender, renal function, and changes in BPs or heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resistant hypertension, nephron blockade with a combination of diuretics significantly improves cardiac markers of diastolic dysfunction independently of BP lowering.

Preferred Fourth-Line Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: Are We There Yet?

Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains above target levels despite adherence to at least three different antihypertensive medications, typically including a diuretic. Epidemiological studies estimate that RH is increasing in prevalence, and is associated with detrimental health outcomes. The pathophysiology underlying RH is complex, involving multiple, overlapping contributors including activation of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, volume overload, endothelial dysfunction, behavioural and lifestyle factors. Hypertension guidelines currently recommend specific pharmacotherapy for 1st, 2nd and 3rd-line treatment, however no specific fourth-line pharmacotherapy is provided for those with RH. Rather, five different antihypertensive drug classes are generally suggested as possible alternatives, including: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, α1-adrenergic antagonists, α2-adrenergic agonists, β-blockers, and peripheral vasodilators. Each of these drug classes vary in their efficacy, tolerability and safety profile. This review summarises the available data on each of these drug classes as a potential fourth-line drug and reveals a lack of robust clinical evidence for preferred use of most of these classes in the setting of RH. Moreover, there is a lack of direct comparative trials that could assist in identifying a preferred fourth-line pharmacologic approach and in providing evidence for hypertensive guidelines for adequate treatment of RH.

Unsweetening the Heart: Possible Pleiotropic Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Cardio and Cerebrovascular Alterations in Resistant Hypertensive Subjects

Resistant hypertension (RH) is a multifactorial disease associated with several target organ damage, such as microalbuminuria, left ventricular hypertrophy, and arterial stiffness. These subjects have high cardiovascular complications, especially when associated with diabetes condition. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors represent a new class of oral antidiabetic drugs that have shown positive effects in diabetics and even hypertensives subjects. Several studies demonstrated positive outcomes related to blood pressure levels, body weight, and glycemic control. Also found a reduction on microalbuminuria, cardiac and arterial remodeling process, and decrease in hospitalization care due heart failure. Despite these positive effects, the outcomes found for stroke were conflicted and tend neutral effect. Based on this, we sought to assess the pleiotropic effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors and the possible impact in RH subjects. In order to analyze the prospects of SGLT-2 inhibitors as a possible medication to complement the therapy manage of this high-risk class of patients.

Copeptin is increased in resistant hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The participation of vasopressin in the mechanisms of resistant hypertension is unclear. We compared plasma copeptin concentration, a surrogate marker for vasopressin secretion, between patients with resistant hypertension and those with controlled blood pressure (CBP), in a post hoc analysis of the Prise en charge de l'Hypertension Artérielle RESistante au traitement trial.

METHODS

After 4-week treatment with irbesartan 300 mg/day, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day, and amlodipine 5 mg/day (baseline), 166 patients were classified as having resistant hypertension (n = 140) or CBP (n = 26) by ambulatory BP monitoring. Patients with resistant hypertension were then randomized for 12 weeks of sequential nephron blockade (n = 74) or sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade (n = 66). Plasma copeptin concentration was measured at baseline and week 12 by immunoassay.

RESULTS

Baseline plasma copeptin concentration was positively associated with male sex, plasma osmolality, BP, and negatively with glomerular filtration rate. It was higher in the resistant hypertension than in the CBP group [geometric mean 5.7 (confidence interval 95% 5.1-6.4) vs. 2.9 (2.3-3.9) fmol/ml, adjusted P < 0.0001). The relationship between plasma copeptin concentration and urinary osmolality was similar in the two groups. At 12 weeks, plasma copeptin concentration in patients whose BP was controlled by sequential nephron blockade or sequential renin-angiotensin system blockade [6.8 (5.6-8.2) and 4.3 (3.0-5.9) fmol/ml, respectively) remained significantly higher than in patients with CBP at baseline (P < 0.0001 vs. both).

CONCLUSION

In patients with resistant hypertension, plasma copeptin concentrations were approximately two-fold higher than those of patients with CBP, after adjustment for plasma osmolality. This difference was not accounted for by renal resistance to vasopressin, suggesting a primary reset of osmostat.

Third-generation Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Why Do We Need a Fourth?

The first mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist, spironolactone, was developed almost 60 years ago to treat primary aldosteronism and pathological edema. Its use waned in part because of its lack of selectivity. Subsequently, knowledge of the scope of MR function was expanded along with clinical evidence of the therapeutic importance of MR antagonists to prevent the ravages of inappropriate MR activation. Forty-two years elapsed between the first and MR-selective second generation of MR antagonists. Fifteen years later, despite serious shortcomings of the existing antagonists, a third-generation antagonist has yet to be marketed. Progress has been slowed by the lack of appreciation of the large variety of cell types that express the MR and its diverse cell-type-specific actions, and also its unique complex interaction actions at the molecular level. New MR antagonists should preferentially target the inflammatory and fibrotic effects of MR and perhaps its excitatory effects on sympathetic nervous system, but not the renal tubular epithelium or neurons of the cortex and hippocampus. This review briefly describes efforts to develop a third-generation MR antagonist and why fourth generation antagonists and selective agonists based on structural determinants of tissue and ligand-specific MR activation should be contemplated.

The double challenge of resistant hypertension and chronic kidney disease

Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure above goal despite adherence to a combination of at least three optimally dosed antihypertensive medications, one of which is a diuretic. Chronic kidney disease is the most frequent of several patient factors or comorbidities associated with resistant hypertension. The prevalence of resistant hypertension is increased in patients with chronic kidney disease, while chronic kidney disease is associated with an impaired prognosis in patients with resistant hypertension. Recommended low-salt diet and triple antihypertensive drug regimens that include a diuretic, should be complemented by the sequential addition of other antihypertensive drugs. New therapeutic innovations for resistant hypertension, such as renal denervation and carotid barostimulation, are under investigation especially in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. We discuss resistant hypertension in chronic kidney disease stages 3-5 (ie, patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) and not on dialysis), in terms of worldwide epidemiology, outcomes, causes and pathophysiology, evidence-based treatment, and a call for action.