The MCART Consortium Animal Model Series: MCART Animal Model Refinement and MCM Development: Defining organ dose, organ-specific tissue imaging, model validation and the natural history between the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE)

Product Development within the National Institutes of Health Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program

The Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) was established to facilitate the development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) and diagnostic approaches for use in a radiation public health emergency. Approvals for MCMs can be very challenging but are made possible under the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Animal Rule, which is designed to enable licensure of drugs or biologics when clinical efficacy studies are unethical or unfeasible. The NIAID portfolio includes grants, contracts, and inter-agency agreements designed to span all aspects of drug development and encompasses basic research through FDA approval. In addition, NIAID manages an active portfolio of biodosimetry approaches to assess injuries and absorbed radiation levels to guide triage and treatment decisions. NIAID, together with grantees, contractors, and other stakeholders with promising products, works to advance candidate MCMs and biodosimetry tools through an established product development pipeline. In addition to managing grants and contracts, NIAID tests promising candidates in our established preclinical animal models, and the NIAID Program Officers work closely with sponsors as product managers to guide them through the process. In addition, a valuable benefit for stakeholders is working with the NIAID Office of Regulatory Affairs, where NIAID coordinates with the FDA to facilitate interactions between sponsors and the agency. Activities funded by NIAID include basic research (e.g., library screens to discover new products, determine early efficacy, and delineate mechanism of action) and the development of small and large animal models of radiation-induced hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, lung, kidney, and skin injury, radiation combined injury, and radionuclide decorporation. NIAID also sponsors Good Laboratory Practice product safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicology studies, as well as efficacy and dose-ranging studies to optimize product regimens. For later-stage candidates, NIAID funds large-scale manufacturing and formulation development of products. The program also supports Phase 1 human clinical studies to ensure human safety and to bridge pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data from animals to humans. To date, NIAID has supported >900 animal studies and one clinical study, evaluating >500 new/repurposed radiation MCMs and biodosimetric approaches. NIAID sponsorship led to the approval of three of the six drugs for acute radiation syndrome under the FDA Animal Rule, five Investigational New Drug applications, and 18 additional submissions for Investigational Device Exemptions, while advancing 38 projects to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority for follow-on research and development.

Radiation-induced multi-organ injury

PURPOSE

Natural history studies have been informative in dissecting radiation injury, isolating its effects, and compartmentalizing injury based on the extent of exposure and the elapsed time post-irradiation. Although radiation injury models are useful for investigating the mechanism of action in isolated subsyndromes and development of medical countermeasures (MCMs), it is clear that ionizing radiation exposure leads to multi-organ injury (MOI).

METHODS

The Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program within the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases partnered with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority to convene a virtual two-day meeting titled 'Radiation-Induced Multi-Organ Injury' on June 7-8, 2022. Invited subject matter experts presented their research findings in MOI, including study of mechanisms and possible MCMs to address complex radiation-induced injuries.

RESULTS

This workshop report summarizes key information from each presentation and discussion by the speakers and audience participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the mechanisms that lead to radiation-induced MOI is critical to advancing candidate MCMs that could mitigate the injury and reduce associated morbidity and mortality. The observation that some of these mechanisms associated with MOI include systemic injuries, such as inflammation and vascular damage, suggests that MCMs that address systemic pathways could be effective against multiple organ systems.

Mitigation of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) with human umbilical cord blood

PURPOSE

The growing concern over potential unintended nuclear accidents or malicious activities involving nuclear/radiological devices cannot be overstated. Exposure to whole-body doses of radiation can result in acute radiation syndrome (ARS), colloquially known as "radiation sickness," which can severely damage various organ systems. Long-term health consequences, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, can develop many years post-exposure. Identifying effective medical countermeasures and devising a strategic medical plan represents an urgent, unmet need. Various clinical studies have investigated the therapeutic use of umbilical cord blood (UCB) for a range of illnesses, including ARS. The objective of this review is to thoroughly discuss ARS and its sub-syndromes, and to highlight recent findings regarding the use of UCB for radiation injury. UCB, a rich source of stem cells, boasts numerous advantages over other stem cell sources, like bone marrow, owing to its ease of collection and relatively low risk of severe graft-versus-host disease. Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with UCB, and often UCB-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), results in improved survival, accelerated hematopoietic recovery, reduced gastrointestinal tract damage, and mitigation of radiation-induced pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that UCB-derived exosomes and their microRNAs (miRNAs) might assist in treating radiation-induced damage, largely by inhibiting fibrotic pathways.

CONCLUSION

UCB holds substantial potential as a radiation countermeasure, and future research should focus on establishing treatment parameters for ARS victims.

Medical management of acute radiation syndrome

Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) is a clinical syndrome involving four organ systems, resulting in the hematopoietic syndrome (HS), gastrointestinal subsyndrome (GIS), neurovascular subsyndrome (NVS) and cutaneous subsyndrome (CS). Since few healthcare providers have seen an ARS case, evidence-based recommendations are needed to guide medical management in a mass casualty scenario. The authors reviewed recommendations from evidence-based and narrative reviews by expert consultants to the World Health Organisation (WHO), a subsequent review of published HS cases, and infectious disease guidelines for management of febrile neutropenia. The WHO Consultancy applied a rigorous grading system to evaluate treatment strategies described in published ARS cases as of 2009, strategies to manage HS in unirradiated persons, results of ARS studies in animal models of ARS, and recommendations of prior expert panels. Major findings for HS were (a) no randomised controlled studies have been performed, (b) data are restricted by the lack of comparator groups, and (c) reports of countermeasures for management of injury to non-hematopoietic organs are often incomplete. Strength of recommendations ranged from strong to weak. Countermeasures of potential benefit include cytokines and for a subgroup of HS patients, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These recommendations did not change in a subsequent analysis of HS cases. Recommendations also included fluoroquinolones, bowel decontamination, serotonin receptor antagonists, loperamide and enteral nutrition for GIS; supportive care for NVS; and topical steroids, antihistamines and antibiotics, and surgical excision/grafting for CS. Also reviewed are critical care management guidelines, the role of mesenchymal stem cells for CS, the potential of a platelet-stimulating cytokine for HS, and the author's approach to clinical management of microbial infections associated with ARS based on published guidelines of infectious disease experts. Today's management of HS is supported by evidence-based guidelines. Management of non-HS subsyndromes is supported by a narrative review of the literature and recommendations of infectious disease societies.

Screening of radiation gastrointestinal injury biomarkers in rat plasma by high-coverage targeted lipidomics

INTRODUCTION

In the event of radiological accidents and cancer radiotherapies in clinic, the gastrointestinal (GI) system is vulnerable to ionizing radiation and shows GI injury. Accessible biomarkers may provide means to predict, evaluate, and treat GI tissue damage. The current study investigated radiation GI injury biomarkers in rat plasma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

High-coverage targeted lipidomics was employed to profile lipidome perturbations at 72 h after 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 Gy (⁶⁰Co γ-rays at 1 Gy/min) total-body irradiation in male rat jejunum. The results were correlated with previous plasma screening outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 93 differential metabolites and 28 linear dose-responsive metabolites were screened in the jejunum. Moreover, 52 lipid species with significant differences both in jejunum and plasma were obtained. Three lipid species with linear dose-response relationship both in jejunum and plasma were put forth, which exhibited good to excellent sensitivity and specificity in triaging different exposure levels.

DISCUSSION

The linear dose-effect relationship of lipid metabolites in the jejunum and the triage performance of radiation GI injury biomarkers in plasma were studied for the first time.

CONCLUSION

The present study can provide insights into expanded biomarkers of IR-mediated GI injury and minimally invasive assays for evaluation.

United States medical preparedness for nuclear and radiological emergencies

With the end of the Cold War in 1991, U.S. Government (USG) investments in radiation science and medical preparedness were phased out; however, the events of 11 September, which involved a terroristic attack on American soil, led to the re-establishment of funding for both radiation preparedness and development of approaches to address injuries. Similar activities have also been instituted worldwide, as the global threat of a radiological or nuclear incident continues to be a concern. Much of the USG's efforts to plan for the unthinkable have centred on establishing clear lines of communication between agencies with responsibility for triage and medical response, and external stakeholders. There have also been strong connections made between those parts of the government that establish policies, fund research, oversee regulatory approval, and purchase and stockpile necessary medical supplies. Progress made in advancing preparedness has involved a number of subject matter meetings and tabletop exercises, publication of guidance documents, assessment of available resources, clear establishment of anticipated concepts of operation for multiple radiation and nuclear scenarios, and identification/mobilization of resources. From a scientific perspective, there were clear research gaps that needed to be addressed, which included the need to identify accurate biomarkers and design biodosimetry devices to triage large numbers of civilians, develop decorporation agents that are more amenable for mass casualty use, and advance candidate products to address injuries caused by radiation exposure and thereby improve survival. Central to all these activities was the development of several different animal constructs, since efficacy testing of these approaches requires extensive work in research models that accurately simulate what would be expected in humans. Recent experiences with COVID-19 have provided an opportunity to revisit aspects of radiation preparedness, and leverage those lessons learned to enhance readiness for a possible future radiation public health emergency.

The Natural History of Acute Radiation-induced H-ARS and Concomitant Multi-organ Injury in the Non-human Primate: The MCART Experience

ABSTRACT

The dose response relationship and corresponding values for mid-lethal dose and slope are used to define the dose- and time-dependent parameters of the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome. The characteristic time course of mortality, morbidity, and secondary endpoints are well defined. The concomitant comorbidities, potential mortality, and other multi-organ injuries that are similarly dose- and time-dependent are less defined. Determination of the natural history or pathophysiology associated with the lethal hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome is a significant gap in knowledge, especially when considered in the context of a nuclear weapon scenario. In this regard, the exposure is likely ill-defined, heterogenous, and nonuniform. These conditions forecast sparing of bone marrow and increased survival from the acute radiation syndrome consequent to threshold doses for the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure due to marrow sparing, medical management, and use of approved medical countermeasures. The intent herein is to provide a composite natural history of the pathophysiology concomitant with the evolution of the potentially lethal hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome derived from studies that focused on total body irradiation and partial body irradiation with bone marrow sparing. The marked differential in estimated LD50/60 from 7.5 Gy to 10.88 Gy for the total body irradiation and partial body irradiation with 5% bone marrow sparing models, respectively, provided a clear distinction between the attendant multiple organ injury and natural history of the two models that included medical management. Total body irradiation was focused on equivalent LD50/60 exposures. The 10 Gy and 11 Gy partial body with 5% bone marrow sparing exposures bracketed the LD50/60 (10.88 Gy). The incidence, progression, and duration of multiple organ injury was described for each exposure protocol within the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome. The higher threshold doses for the partial body irradiation with bone marrow sparing protocol induced a marked degree of multiple organ injury to include lethal gastrointestinal acute radiation syndrome, prolonged crypt loss and mucosal damage, immune suppression, acute kidney injury, body weight loss, and added clinical comorbidities that defined a complex timeline of organ injury through the acute hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome. The natural history of the acute radiation syndrome presents a 60-d time segment of multi-organ sequelae that is concomitant with the latent period or time to onset of the evolving multi-organ injury of the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure.

Scientific research and product development in the United States to address injuries from a radiation public health emergency

The USA has experienced one large-scale nuclear incident in its history. Lessons learned during the Three-Mile Island nuclear accident provided government planners with insight into property damage resulting from a low-level release of radiation, and an awareness concerning how to prepare for future occurrences. However, if there is an incident resulting from detonation of an improvised nuclear device or state-sponsored device/weapon, resulting casualties and the need for medical treatment could overwhelm the nation's public health system. After the Cold War ended, government investments in radiation preparedness declined; however, the attacks on 9/11 led to re-establishment of research programs to plan for the possibility of a nuclear incident. Funding began in earnest in 2004, to address unmet research needs for radiation biomarkers, devices and products to triage and treat potentially large numbers of injured civilians. There are many biodosimetry approaches and medical countermeasures (MCMs) under study and in advanced development, including those to address radiation-induced injuries to organ systems including bone marrow, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, lungs, skin, vasculature and kidneys. Biomarkers of interest in determining level of radiation exposure and susceptibility of injury include cytogenetic changes, 'omics' technologies and other approaches. Four drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute radiation syndrome (ARS), with other licensures being sought; however, there are still no cleared devices to identify radiation-exposed individuals in need of treatment. Although many breakthroughs have been made in the efforts to expand availability of medical products, there is still work to be done.

Radiation countermeasures for hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome: growth factors, cytokines and beyond

PURPOSE

The intent of this article is to report the status of some of the pharmaceuticals currently in late stage development for possible use for individuals unwantedly and acutely injured as a result of radiological/nuclear exposures. The two major questions we attempt to address here are: (a) What medicinals are currently deemed by regulatory authorities (US FDA) to be safe and effective and are being stockpiled? (b) What additional agents might be needed to make the federal/state/local medicinal repositories more robust and useful in effectively managing contingencies involving radiation overexposures?

CONCLUSIONS

A limited number (precisely four) of medicinals have been deemed safe and effective, and are approved by the US FDA for the 'hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS).' These agents are largely recombinant growth factors (e.g. rhuG-CSF/filgrastim, rhuGM-CSF/sargramostim) that target and stimulate myeloid progenitors within bone marrow. Romiplostim, a small molecular agonist that enhances platelet production via stimulation of bone marrow megakaryocytes, has been recently approved and indicated for H-ARS. It is critical that additional agents for other major sub-syndromes of ARS (gastrointestinal-ARS) be approved. Future success in developing such medicinals will undoubtedly entail some form of a polypharmaceutical strategy, or perhaps novel, bioengineered chimeric agents with multiple, radioprotective/radiomitigative functionalities.

Metabolomics-based predictive biomarkers of radiation injury and countermeasure efficacy: current status and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

There is an urgent need for specific and sensitive bioassays to augment biodosimetric assessments of unwanted and excessive radiation exposures that originate from unexpected nuclear/radiological events, including nuclear accidents, acts of terrorism, or the use of a radiological dispersal device. If sufficiently intense, such ionizing radiation exposures are likely to impact normal metabolic processes within the cells and organs of the body, thus inducing multifaceted biological responses.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the application of metabolomics, an emerging and promising technology based on quantitative and qualitative determinations of small molecules in biological samples for the rapid assessment of an individual's exposure to ionizing radiation. Recent advancements in the analytics of high-resolution chromatography, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics have led to untargeted (global) and targeted (quantitative phase) approaches to identify biomarkers of radiation injury and countermeasure efficacy. Biomarkers are deemed essential for both assessing the radiation exposure levels and for extrapolative processes involved in determining scaling factors of a given radiation countering medicinal between experimental animals and humans.

EXPERT OPINION

The discipline of metabolomics appears to be highly informative in assessing radiation exposure levels and for identifying biomarkers of radiation injury and countermeasure efficacy.

Repurposing Pharmaceuticals Previously Approved by Regulatory Agencies to Medically Counter Injuries Arising Either Early or Late Following Radiation Exposure

The increasing risks of radiological or nuclear attacks or associated accidents have served to renew interest in developing radiation medical countermeasures. The development of prospective countermeasures and the subsequent gain of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval are invariably time consuming and expensive processes, especially in terms of generating essential human data. Due to the limited resources for drug development and the need for expedited drug approval, drug developers have turned, in part, to the strategy of repurposing agents for which safety and clinical data are already available. Approval of drugs that are already in clinical use for one indication and are being repurposed for another indication is inherently faster and more cost effective than for new agents that lack regulatory approval of any sort. There are four known growth factors which have been repurposed in the recent past as radiomitigators following the FDA Animal Rule: Neupogen, Neulasta, Leukine, and Nplate. These four drugs were in clinic for several decades for other indications and were repurposed. A large number of additional agents approved by various regulatory authorities for given indications are currently under investigation for dual use for acute radiation syndrome or for delayed pathological effects of acute radiation exposure. The process of drug repurposing, however, is not without its own set of challenges and limitations.

A Systematic Review of the Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome (H-ARS) in Canines and Non-human Primates: Acute Mixed Neutron/Gamma vs. Reference Quality Radiations

A systematic review of relevant studies that determined the dose response relationship (DRR) for the hematopoietic (H) acute radiation syndrome (ARS) in the canine relative to radiation quality of mixed neutron:gamma radiations, dose rate, and exposure uniformity relative to selected reference radiation exposure has not been performed. The datasets for rhesus macaques exposure to mixed neutron:gamma radiation are used herein as a species comparative reference to the canine database. The selection of data cohorts was made from the following sources: Ovid Medline (1957-present), PubMed (1954-present), AGRICOLA (1976-present), Web of Science (1954-present), and US HHS RePORT (2002-present). The total number of hits across all search sites was 3,077. Several referenced, unpublished, non-peer reviewed government reports were unavailable for review. Primary published studies using canines, beagles, and mongrels were evaluated to provide an informative and consistent review of mixed neutron:gamma radiation effects to establish the DRRs for the H-ARS. Secondary and tertiary studies provided additional information on the hematologic response or the effects on hematopoietic progenitor cells, radiation dosimetry, absorbed dose, and organ dose. The LD50/30 values varied with neutron quality, exposure aspect, and mixed neutron:gamma ratio. The reference radiation quality varied from 250 kVp or 1-2 MeV x radiation and Co gamma radiation. A summary of a published review of a data set describing the DRR in rhesus macaques for mixed neutron:gamma radiation exposure in the H-ARS is included for a comparative reference to the canine dataset. The available evidence provided a reliable and extensive database that characterized the DRR for the H-ARS in canines and young rhesus macaques exposed to mixed neutron:gamma radiations of variable energy relative to 250 kVp, 1-2 MeV x radiation and Co gamma, and uniform and non-uniform total-body irradiation without the benefit of medical management. The mixed neutron:gamma radiation showed an energy-dependent RBE of ~ 1.0 to 2.0 relative to reference radiation exposure within both species. A marginal database described the DRR for the gastrointestinal (GI)-ARS. Medical management showed benefit in both species relative to the mixed neutron:gamma as well as exposure to reference radiation. The DRR for the H-ARS was characterized by steep slopes and relative LD50/30 values that reflected the radiation quality, exposure aspect, and dose rate over a range in time from 1956-2012.

MALDI-MSI spatially maps N-glycan alterations to histologically distinct pulmonary pathologies following irradiation

Radiation-induced lung injury is a highly complex combination of pathological alterations that develop over time and severity of disease development is dose-dependent. Following exposures to lethal doses of irradiation, morbidity and mortality can occur due to a combination of edema, pneumonitis and fibrosis. Protein glycosylation has essential roles in a plethora of biological and immunological processes. Alterations in glycosylation profiles have been detected in diseases ranging from infection, inflammation and cancer. We utilized mass spectrometry imaging to spatially map N-glycans to distinct pathological alterations during the clinically latent period and at 180 days post-exposure to irradiation. Results identified alterations in a number of high mannose, hybrid and complex N-glycans that were localized to regions of mucus and alveolar-bronchiolar hyperplasia, proliferations of type 2 epithelial cells, accumulations of macrophages, edema and fibrosis. The glycosylation profiles indicate most alterations occur prior to the onset of clinical symptoms as a result of pathological manifestations. Alterations in five N-glycans were identified as a function of time post-exposure. Understanding the functional roles N-glycans play in the development of these pathologies, particularly in the accumulation of macrophages and their phenotype, may lead to new therapeutic avenues for the treatment of radiation-induced lung injury.

Pharmacological management of ionizing radiation injuries: current and prospective agents and targeted organ systems

Introduction: There is a limited array of currently available medicinals that are useful for either the prevention, mitigation or treatment of bodily injuries arising from ionizing radiation exposure.Area covered: In this brief article, the authors review those pharmacologic agents that either are currently being used to counter the injurious effects of radiation exposure, or those that show promise and are currently under development.Expert opinion: Although significant, but limited progress has been made in the development and fielding of safe and effective pharmacotherapeutics for select types of acute radiation-associated injuries, additional effort is needed to broaden the scope of drug development so that overall health risks associated with both short- and long-term injuries in various organ systems can be reduced and effectively managed. There are several promising radiation countermeasures that may gain regulatory approval from the government in the near future for use in clinical settings and in the aftermath of nuclear/radiological exposure contingencies.

Nonhuman primates as models for the discovery and development of radiation countermeasures

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant scientific advances over the past six decades toward the development of safe and effective radiation countermeasures for humans using animal models, only two pharmaceutical agents have been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS). Additional research efforts are needed to further develop large animal models for improving the prediction of clinical safety and effectiveness of radiation countermeasures for ARS and delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE) in humans. Area covered: The authors review the suitability of animal models for the development of radiation countermeasures for ARS following the FDA Animal Rule with a special focus on nonhuman primate (NHP) models of ARS. There are seven centers in the United States currently conducting studies with irradiated NHPs, with the majority of studies being conducted with rhesus monkeys. Expert opinion: The NHP model is considered the gold standard animal model for drug development and approval by the FDA. The lack of suitable substitutes for NHP models for predicting response in humans serves as a bottleneck for the development of radiation countermeasures. Additional large animal models need to be characterized to support the development and FDA-approval of new radiation countermeasures.