Racial/ethnic and insurance status disparities in discharge to posthospitalization care for patients with traumatic brain injury

Development and Validation of a Discharge Disposition Prediction Model in Injured Adults

INTRODUCTION

Early prediction of posthospital disposition is crucial for counseling and planning, particularly for adults away from age extremes, given the greater uncertainty about returning home or requiring postacute care among these patients. We aimed to create a prediction model for discharge disposition using data from the first 24 h of admission.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Trauma Data Bank encompassing patients treated from 2007 to 2016, focusing on individuals aged 35-70, categorized by discharge disposition. Our objective was to predict discharge outcomes - home, rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, or mortality - employing machine learning techniques based on patient factors, including demographics, comorbidities, injuries, and early resource utilization. Each base model underwent training and parameter tuning to optimize the F1 score and was then evaluated on unseen data. The top three base models were chosen to build a stack ensemble model, and performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC), F1, recall, and precision metrics through the one-versus-rest approach, comparing each class. External validation was conducted using data from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study.

RESULTS

A total of 2,342,703 patients were included. A stack ensemble model was built using the three top performers, which yielded AUCs from 0.73 to 0.97 for each class on held out National Trauma Data Bank data. This stacked model demonstrates strong generalizability across Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study, with AUCs spanning from 0.71 to 0.97.

CONCLUSIONS

We created a stacked ensemble model that predicts discharge disposition for adults outside of the extremes of age with injuries within 24 h of admission. Further validation is warranted to show the potential benefits of this model for planning and patient and family guidance.

Burn Center Verification and Safety Net Status: Are There Differences in Discharge to Inpatient Rehabilitation?

Discharge to acute rehabilitation following a major burn injury is crucial for patient recovery and quality of life. However, barriers to acute rehabilitation, including race and payor type, impede access. The effect of burn center organizational structure on discharge disparities remains unknown. This study aims to investigate associations between patient demographics, burn center factors, and discharge to acute rehabilitation on a population level. Using the California Healthcare Access and Information Database, 2009-2019, all inpatient encounters at verified and non-verified burn centers were extracted. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged to acute rehabilitation. Key covariates included age, race, burn center safety net status, diagnosis-related group, American Burn Association (ABA) verification status, and American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center designation. Logistic regression and mixed-effects modeling were performed, with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing. Among 27 496 encounters, 0.8% (228) were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation. By race/ethnicity, the proportion admitted to inpatient rehabilitation was 0.9% for White, 0.6% for Black, 0.7% for Hispanic, and 1% for Asian. After adjusting for burn severity and age, notable predictors for discharge to inpatient rehabilitation included Medicare as payor (OR 0.30-0.88, P = .015) compared to commercial insurance, trauma center status (OR 1.45-3.43, P < .001), ABA verification status (OR 1.16-2.74, P = .008), and safety net facility status (OR 1.09-1.97, P = .013). Discharge to inpatient rehabilitation varies by race, payor status, and individual burn center. Verified and safety net burn centers had more patients discharge to inpatient rehabilitation adjusted for burn severity and demographics.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Referral Rejection From Postacute Care Facilities Among People With Opioid Use Disorder in Massachusetts

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to examine the association between Black, White, and Hispanic or Latino race and ethnicity and referral rejection from private postacute care facilities among hospitalized individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we linked electronic postacute care referrals from Boston Medical Center in 2018 to electronic medical record data, which we used to ascertain OUD status and race and ethnicity. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between Black, White, and Hispanic or Latino race and ethnicity and referral rejection, adjusting for individual-level characteristics including medication for opioid use disorder treatment type and for facility-level factors using facility random effects.

RESULTS

We identified 159 hospitalizations from 141 individuals with OUD referred to private postacute medical care, corresponding to 1272 referrals to 244 facilities. Hospitalizations comprised 53 (33%) non-Hispanic Black, 28 (18%) Hispanic or Latino, and 78 (49%) non-Hispanic White individuals. In adjusted analyses, referrals for non-Hispanic Black individuals had significantly higher odds of rejection compared to referrals for non-Hispanic White individuals (adjusted odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval [1.24, 2.69], P = 0.002). There were no significant differences between referrals for Hispanic or Latino individuals and non-Hispanic White individuals (adjusted odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval [0.67, 1.84], P = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Among people with OUD referred to private postacute care in Massachusetts, non-Hispanic Black individuals were more likely to be rejected compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, demonstrating racism in postacute care admissions. Efforts to address discrimination against people with OUD in postacute care admissions must also address racial equity.

Mapping the institutionalization of racism in the research about race and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: implications for Black populations

PURPOSE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a chronic disease process and a public health concern that disproportionately impacts Black populations. While there is an abundance of literature on race and TBI outcomes, there is a lack of scholarship that addresses racism within rehabilitation care, and it remains untheorized. This article aims to illuminate how racism becomes institutionalized in the scientific scholarship that can potentially inform rehabilitation care for persons with TBI and what the implications are, particularly for Black populations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Applying Bacchi's What's the Problem Represented to be approach, the writings of critical race theory (CRT) are used to examine the research about race and TBI rehabilitation comparable to CRT in other disciplines, including education and legal scholarship.

RESULTS

A CRT examination illustrates that racism is institutionalized in the research about race and TBI rehabilitation through colourblind ideologies, meritocracy, reinforcement of a deficit perspective, and intersections of race and the property functions of whiteness. A conceptual framework for understanding institutional racism in TBI rehabilitation scholarship is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this article speak to the future of TBI rehabilitation research for Black populations, the potential for an anti-racist agenda, and implications for research and practice.

Predictors of mortality and rehabilitation location in adults with prolonged coma following traumatic brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability, often resulting in prolonged coma and disordered consciousness. There are currently gaps in understanding the factors affecting rehabilitation location and outcome after TBI.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the impact of demographics, comorbidities, and complications on discharge disposition in adults with prolonged coma following TBI.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospitals and trauma centers in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 18 years of age or older with TBI and prolonged coma during the years 2008 to 2015.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographics, clinical injury data, comorbidities, and complications were collected, and odds ratios (ORs) and descriptive analysis were calculated for mortality, long-term rehabilitation, and home discharge without services.

RESULTS

A total of 6929 patients with TBI and prolonged coma were included in the final analysis; 3318 (47.9%) were discharged to rehabilitation facilities, 1859 (26.8%) died, and 1752 (25.3%) were discharged home. Older patients and those with higher injury severity scores had significantly higher ORs for mortality and rehab discharge. A total of 58.3% of patients presented with at least one comorbidity. Non-White ethnicities and self-pay/uninsured patients were significantly less likely to be discharged to a rehab facility. Furthermore, comorbidities including congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes were associated with a significantly increased OR for mortality and rehab discharge compared to home discharge without services.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidities, age, and injury severity were the most significant risk factors for increased mortality and acute rehab discharge. Maximizing the treatment of comorbidities including CHF and diabetes has the potential to decrease mortality and adverse outcomes following TBI with prolonged coma.

"Somewhere along the line, your mask isn't going to be fitting right": institutional racism in Black narratives of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation across the practice continuum

BACKGROUND

Over two decades of research about traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation emphasized the persistence of racial health disparities in functional outcomes that disproportionately impact Black populations without naming or addressing racism as the root problem. Further, the experiences of Black people with TBI have yet to be documented and accounted for in scientific scholarship from the perspectives of Black persons in Canada.

PURPOSE

This study intended to examine the rehabilitation narratives of Black TBI survivors, family caregivers, and rehabilitation providers and use critical race theory as a conceptual framework to understand how anti-Black racism manifests in those experiences.

METHODS

Through critical narrative inquiry informed by a critical constructivist paradigm and a critical race theory lens, in-depth narrative interviewing were conducted with seven survivors, three family caregivers, and four rehabilitation providers. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis within and across groups of participants to conceptualize themes and sub-themes.

FINDINGS

Themes captured how racism becomes institutionalized in TBI rehabilitation: (1) the institutional construction of deficient Black bodies, (2) the institutional construction of rehabilitation access, (3) the institutional investment in resisting and approximating whiteness in rehabilitation practice, and (4) the institutional construction of deficient Black futures.

CONCLUSION

Study findings point to the dire need to ensure rehabilitation programs, services, and the delivery of care are not determined based on inequitable practices, racial biases and assumptions about Black people, which determine who deserves to get into rehabilitation and have opportunities to be supported in working towards living a full and meaningful life.

Community resource facilitation use by ethnic minority groups with traumatic brain injury in the Midwestern United States

OBJECTIVE

This study surveyed the use of community-based resource facilitation (RF) services by ethnic minority survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI) living in the Midwestern United States.

METHOD

Past records of RF use by survivors of TBI were reviewed. Demographics and patterns of RF use across 3 ethnic groups were documented. Reported barriers to community integration related to ethnic identity were identified using Chi-square test of independence.

RESULTS

Ethnic minority survivors were less likely to use RF services than white survivors. Caucasian women and men utilized RF services at similar rates, whereas more African American men and Latina women used RF services. Caucasians received information about RF from a greater variety of sources than ethnic minority survivors. Ethnic identity was significantly associated with greater reported needs for TBI awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

A pattern of differential RF use by survivors from ethnic minority groups was noted, suggesting potential socio-cultural influences on help-seeking behavior after TBI. These factors should be considered to develop more accessible and equitable strategies of RF service referral and support. Future investigations of cultural perspectives of TBI and injury-related services may improve understanding of the likelihood and necessity of community-based RF service use by diverse populations.

Racial differences in concussion diagnosis and mechanism of injury among adults presenting to emergency departments across the United States

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between race and concussion diagnosis as well as the association between race and mechanism of injury (MOI) for concussion diagnoses in adult patients (>19 years old) visiting the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patient visits to the ED for concussion between 2010 and 2018, using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, was conducted. Outcome measures included concussion diagnosis and MOI. Multivariable and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess associations between race and outcome variables. The results were weighted to reflect population estimates with a significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 714 patient visits for concussions were identified, representing an estimated 4.3 million visits nationwide. Black adults had lower odds of receiving a concussion diagnosis [p < 0.05, Odds Ratio (OR), 0.54; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.38-0.76] compared to White adults in the ED. There were no significant differences in MOI for a concussion diagnosis by race.

CONCLUSION

Racial differences were found in the ED for concussion diagnosis. Disparities in concussion diagnosis for Black or other minoritized racial groups could have significant repercussions that may prolong recovery or lead to long-term morbidity.

Treatment of Severe Blunt Splenic Injury Varies Across Race and Insurance Type of Pediatric Patients

INTRODUCTION

Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of adult patients with blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) have been previously demonstrated. It is unknown if similar disparities exist in pediatric patients with BSIs. Management of BSIs can include operative management, but nonoperative management (NOM) is preferred. This study assesses the association of race and insurance status on use of NOM among pediatric (aged < 18 y) patients following BSI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were abstracted from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files for calendar years 2013-2017. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between race or insurance status and NOM while controlling for injury severity, age, and facility type. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion within 24 h and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1436 pediatric BSI patients. Black, non-Hispanic patients were less likely (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-1.02, P = 0.043) to undergo NOM and stayed 0.6 d longer (P = 0.010) than White, non-Hispanic patients. Uninsured patients were less likely (odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.25-1.11, P = 0.080) to undergo NOM and publicly insured patients stayed 0.24 d (P = 0.048) longer than privately insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We found disparities in use of NOM for Black patients and uninsured patients as well as differences in length of stay. These results extend the literature on racial and socioeconomic disparities in care of trauma patients to pediatric BSI patients. Addressing these disparities requires additional studies aimed at identifying the underlying causes.

Integrated Care Pathways for Black Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Critical Transdisciplinary Scoping Review of the Clinical Care Journey

Objectives: This novel critical transdisciplinary scoping review examined the literature on integrated care pathways that consider Black people living with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objectives were to (a) summarize the extent, nature, and range of literature on care pathways that consider Black populations, (b) summarize how Blackness, race, and racism are conceptualized in the literature, (c) determine how Black people come to access care pathways, and (d) identify how care pathways in research consider the mechanism of injury and implications for human occupation. Methods: Six databases were searched systematically identifying 178 articles after removing duplicates. In total, 43 articles on integrated care within the context of Black persons with TBI were included. Narrative synthesis was conducted to analyze the data and was presented as descriptive statistics and as a narrative to tell a story. Findings: All studies were based in the United States where 81% reported racial and ethnic disparities across the care continuum primarily using race as a biological construct. Sex, gender, and race are used as demographic variables where statistical data were stratified in only 9% of studies. Black patients are primarily denied access to care, experience lower rates of protocol treatments, poor quality of care, and lack access to rehabilitation. Racial health disparities are disconnected from racism and are displayed as symptoms of a problem that remains unnamed. Conclusion: The findings illustrate how racism becomes institutionalized in research on TBI care pathways, demonstrating the need to incorporate the voices of Black people, transcend disciplinary boundaries, and adopt an anti-racist lens to research.

The Association Between Payer Source and Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes: A TBI Model Systems Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between payer source for acute rehabilitation, residential median household income (MHI), and outcomes at rehabilitation discharge after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

SETTING

Acute inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 8558 individuals enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) National Database who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation between 2006 and 2019 and were younger than 64 years.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis from a multicenter longitudinal cohort study.

MAIN MEASURES

Payer source was divided into 4 categories: uninsured, public insurance, private insurance, and workers' compensation/auto. Relationships between payer source with residential MHI, rehabilitation length of stay (RLOS), and the FIM Instrument at discharge were examined. Covariates included age, injury severity, FIM at admission, and a number of sociodemographic characteristics including minority status, preinjury limitations, education level, and employment status.

RESULTS

Individuals with workers' compensation/auto or private insurance had longer RLOS than uninsured individuals or those with public insurance after controlling for demographics and injury characteristics. An adjusted model controlling for demographics and injury characteristics showed a significant main effect of payer source on FIM scores at discharge, with the highest scores noted among those with workers' compensation/auto insurance. The main effect of payer source on FIM at discharge became nonsignificant after RLOS was added to the model as a covariate, suggesting a mediating effect of RLOS.

CONCLUSION

Payer source was associated with preinjury residential MHI and predicted RLOS. While prior studies have demonstrated the effect of payer source on long-term outcomes due to lack of inpatient rehabilitation or quality follow-up care, this study demonstrated that individuals with TBI who are uninsured or have public insurance may be at risk for poorer functional status at the point of rehabilitation discharge than those with private insurance, particularly compared with those with workers' compensation/auto insurance. This effect may be largely driven by having a shorter length of stay in acute rehabilitation.

Influence of socioeconomic factors on discharge disposition following traumatic cervicothoracic spinal cord injury at level I and II trauma centers in the United States

BACKGROUND

Discharge to acute rehabilitation is strongly correlated with functional recovery after traumatic injury, including spinal cord injury (SCI). However, services such as acute care rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) are expensive. Our objective was to understand if high-cost, resource-intensive post-discharge rehabilitation or alternative care facilities are utilized at disparate rates across socioeconomic groups after SCI.

METHODS

We performed a cohort analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank® tabulated from 2012-2016. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of cervical or thoracic spine fracture with spinal cord injury (SCI) and were treated surgically. We evaluated associations of sociodemographic and psychosocial variables with non-home discharge (e.g., discharge to SNF, other healthcare facility, or intermediate care facility) via multivariable logistic regression while correcting for injury severity and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 3933 eligible patients. Patients who were older, male (OR=1.29 95% Confidence Interval [1.07-1.56], p=.007), insured by Medicare (OR=1.45 [1.08-1.96], p=.015), diagnosed with a major psychiatric disorder (OR=1.40 [1.03-1.90], p=.034), had a higher Injury Severity Score (OR=5.21 [2.96-9.18], p<.001) or a lower Glasgow Coma Score (3-8 points, OR=2.78 [1.81-4.27], p<.001) had a higher chance of a non-home discharge. The only sociodemographic variable associated with lower likelihood of utilizing additional healthcare facilities following discharge was uninsured status (OR=0.47 [0.37-0.60], p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Uninsured patients are less likely to be discharged to acute rehabilitation or alternative healthcare facilities following surgical management of SCI. High out-of-pocket costs for uninsured patients in the United States may deter utilization of these services.

Adequacy of Healthcare by Insurance Type in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant contributor to disability, especially among patients younger than 18 years old in the United States. While insurance is often needed to receive services, studies investigating whether TBI treatment adequacy is dependent on the insurance type are scant. Our objective was to determine whether private insurance in paediatric TBI patients is associated with a higher perceived adequacy of healthcare compared with non-private insurance. This was a cross-sectional study utilising secondary data collected from the National Survey of Children Health 2011/12. The main exposure of interest was the insurance status of children at the time of a TBI (private vs non-private). The study outcome was the perceived adequacy of healthcare, defined as having coverage needs that were usually or always met by insurance. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis were used. After adjustments for the covariates, the odds of adequate healthcare among those with non-private insurance compared with those with private were not statistically significant (OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.87–2.55). This study implicates paediatric TBI patients do not believe they receive adequate healthcare independent of insurance status. Clinicians, policy makers, and researchers need to better evaluate and address this issue.

Disparities in discharge patterns of admitted older patients with ocular trauma

PURPOSE

In older patients, poor vision from ocular trauma increases the likelihood of further injuries and repeat hospitalizations, underscoring the need for appropriate post-hospitalization care. We sought to evaluate disposition patterns of older patients admitted with ocular trauma.

METHODS/MATERIALS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the National Trauma Data Bank (2008-2014) and de-identified data of patients, ≥65 years old, admitted with ocular trauma were identified using ICD-9CM and E-codes. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, type of ocular injury, comorbidities, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, length of hospital stay, location and US region, insurance, and discharge disposition were extracted. Analysis was performed with student's t-test, Chi-squared test, and odds ratios (OR) using SPSS software. Statistical significance was set at P <.05.

RESULTS

58,074 (18.3%) of 316,485 patients admitted with ocular trauma were >65yrs. 26,346 (45.4%) were discharged home and 23,314 (40.1%) to an advanced care facility (ACF). Nursing home residents were most likely to return to ACF (OR, 4.76; 95%CI, 4.40-5.14; P < .001). Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma score [GCS]<8) (OR, 4.57; 95%CI, 4.09-5.11; P < .001), very severe injury severity score (ISS ≥24) (OR, 3.73; 95%CI, 3.46-4.01; P < .001), females (OR, 1.27; 95%CI, 1.23-1.32; P < .001), white patients (OR, 1.29; 95%CI, 1.24-1.36; P < .001) and Medicare beneficiaries (OR, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.09-1.19; P < .001) were most likely to be discharged to an ACF. Demography-related discharge propensities prevailed nationwide and within insurance categories. Multivariate regression analysis revealed factors determining ACF placement were, in order: length of hospital stay, nursing home residency, GCS<8, ISS>24, female gender, white race, and Medicare insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic, black, male, and self-paying patients were disproportionately discharged home. Ocular injuries had low impact on ACF placement. Understanding these disparities will assist in developing guidelines for appropriate and equitable post-trauma rehabilitation in this vulnerable population.

Extracellular vesicle neurofilament light is elevated within the first 12-months following traumatic brain injury in a U.S military population

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be associated with long-term neurobehavioral symptoms. Here, we examined levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in extracellular vesicles isolated from blood, and their relationship with TBI severity and neurobehavioral symptom reporting. Participants were 218 service members and veterans who sustained uncomplicated mild TBIs (mTBI, n = 107); complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBIs (smcTBI, n = 66); or Injured controls (IC, orthopedic injury without TBI, n = 45). Within one year after injury, but not after, NfL was higher in the smcTBI group than mTBI (p = 0.001, d = 0.66) and IC (p = 0.001, d = 0.35) groups, which remained after controlling for demographics and injury characteristics. NfL also discriminated the smcTBI group from IC (AUC:77.5%, p < 0.001) and mTBI (AUC:76.1%, p < 0.001) groups. No other group differences were observed for NfL or GFAP at either timepoint. NfL correlated with post-concussion symptoms (rs = - 0.38, p = 0.04) in the mTBI group, and with PTSD symptoms in mTBI (rs = - 0.43, p = 0.021) and smcTBI groups (rs = - 0.40, p = 0.024) within one year after injury, which was not confirmed in regression models. Our results suggest the potential of NfL, a protein previously linked to axonal damage, as a diagnostic biomarker that distinguishes TBI severity within the first year after injury.

Identifying factors associated with acute hospital discharge dispositions in patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Identify sociodemographic, injury, and hospital-level factors associated with acute hospital discharge dispositions following acute hospitalization for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States.

METHODS

The 2011-2014 National Trauma Data Bank data was used, including 466 acute care hospitals and 114,736 patients ≥16 years old who survived moderate-to-severe TBI. Outcome was acute hospital discharge dispositions: home with/without care (HC), skilled nursing home/other care facility (SNF/ICF) and inpatient rehabilitation/long-term care facility (IRF). Independent variables were patients' sociodemographic, injury, and hospital-level factors. Multilevel modeling was used to assess associations and compare likelihood of discharges.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 74.5%, 14.6% ,and 10.9% were discharged to HC, SNF/ICF ,and IRF, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated that hospitals explained 14.3% and 14.8% of variations in probabilities of institution dispositions. Sociodemographic factors including older age, females, Non-Hispanic Whites, recipients of commercial insurance, and Medicare/Medicaid were significantly associated with higher institution discharges. Hospital-related factors including bed size, teaching status, trauma accreditations, and hospital locations were significantly associated with discharge dispositions.

CONCLUSION

Identifying factors associated with discharge dispositions after acute hospitalization of TBI is pertinent to ensure quality of care and optimal patient outcomes. Further research into hospital-related variations in acute care discharge dispositions is recommended.

Sociodemographic, geographic and clinical factors associated with functional outcome and discharge location in US inpatient rehabilitation settings

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of sociodemographic factors, clinical factors and regional differences on both patients' functional outcome and discharge location in U.S. inpatient rehabilitation settings.

METHODS

Using eRehabData, 536,453 admissions was used for functional outcome analyses (based on FIM gain) while 259,308 admissions was used for the discharge location analyses. Regression models were used to look at both outcomes.

RESULTS

Having private insurance and being young and male was associated with the higher FIM gains while being African American, widowed, and living in the Midwest was associated with the lower FIM gains. Furthermore, having private insurance, being young, male, married and African American or Hispanic was associated with the lower odds of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility while living in the Midwest was associated with the greatest odds of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility. Clinical factors such as days from onset and length of stay also had a significant effect on both outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that, in the U.S., one of the challenges to successful recovery in the inpatient rehabilitation setting includes insurance status (Medicare/Medicaid), race (African American) but also regional differences (Midwest) and length of stay.

Employment probability trajectories in hispanics over the 10 years after traumatic brain injury: A model systems study

BACKGROUND

Research has found that Hispanics with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have reduced functional outcomes compared to non-Hispanic Whites, including lower probabilities of post-injury employment. However, previous studies were cross-sectional, combined racial/ethnic minority groups, and did not examine the factors that predict return to work of Hispanics longitudinally.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the demographic and injury-related predictors of employment probability trajectories during the first 10 years after TBI.

METHODS

1,346 Hispanics in the TBI Model Systems Database were included. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine baseline predictors of employment probability trajectories across this time period.

RESULTS

Employment probability demonstrated a quadratic movement over time, with an initial increase followed by a plateau or slight decrease. Hispanics with TBI had higher employment probability trajectories if they had been younger at the time of injury, spent less time in posttraumatic amnesia, had greater years of education, had been employed at the time of injury, had higher annual earnings at the time of injury, and had experienced a non-violent mechanism of injury.

CONCLUSION

Culturally adapted treatment programs with a focus on early intervention incorporating vocational rehabilitation and employment programs for Hispanics with TBI who present with these risk factors are needed.

Inpatient rehabilitation facility discharge destination among younger adults with traumatic brain injury: differences by race and ethnicity

OBJECTIVE

: To determine the association of race and ethnicity with discharge destination among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) receiving inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) care.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis using Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation data.

METHODS

: Patients (N = 99,614) diagnosed with TBI, age 18-64, admitted for IRF care between 2002 and 2018. Logistic regression was used to analyze data.

OUTCOME

: Discharge destination (home/community vs. subacute settings).

RESULTS

: Most younger adults (age 18-64) with TBI were discharged home (89.24%) after IRF care vs. subacute (10.76%). Of those discharged home, 63.16% were white, 10.42% Black, 8.94% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.72% other races/ethnicities. After adjusting for covariates, patients who were Hispanic/Latino [OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.37] and other race/ethnicities [OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.21] (vs. White) had higher odds of discharge home vs. subacute. There was no difference in discharge destination for Black patients (vs. white). Predictors of discharge destination for groups stratified by race/ethnicity varied.

CONCLUSIONS

: Younger patients with TBI who were Hispanic/Latino or other races/ethnicities (vs. white) were more likely to go home vs. subacute. Findings can be used to inform IRF planning, resource allocation, and transitional care planning.

Selection of discharge destination for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVES

To investigate criteria acute care interdisciplinary providers use to select discharge destination for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, exploratory survey study.

METHODS

Data were collected from interdisciplinary providers at a U.S. Level I trauma centre via electronic survey. We invited 199 providers to participate and 27 responded (13.5% response rate). Responses were received from physicians and physical, occupational, and speech therapists.

RESULTS

Findings showed variability in standard criteria and clinical judgment criteria providers used to select discharge destination for patients with TBI receiving acute care. There was limited agreement on standard criteria used to select discharge destination. Findings showed some agreement between providers on clinical judgment criteria used to select home as discharge destination and to prevent discharge to home. Most common clinical judgment criteria included therapists' recommendations on discharge location, patient's level of independence in activities of daily living, planned family support and ventilator dependence. Agreement on clinical judgment criteria became more limited when stratifying by discipline, frequency of patient care and experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings on clinical judgment criteria providers use to select acute care discharge destination for patients with TBI are inconclusive.

Variability in Discharge Disposition Across US Trauma Centers After Treatment for High-Energy Lower Extremity Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between patient- and center-level characteristics and discharge to an inpatient facility versus home after treatment for lower extremity trauma, as well as examine the variability in discharge disposition across clinical centers after controlling for these factors.

DESIGN

This is an analysis of data collected prospectively across 5 multicenter studies of extremity trauma.

SETTING

US Trauma Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 18-80 years with lower extremity trauma treated at 1 of 55 participating centers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Among 2365 patients treated at 1 of 55 centers across 13 states, 673 (28.5%) were discharged to an inpatient facility, and 1692 (71.5%) were discharged home. Individuals who were older, female, unmarried, insured, higher body mass index, history of severe alcohol abuse, Gustilo type IIIB or IIIC open injuries, bilateral, spine and upper extremity injuries, higher injury severity score scores, or intensive care unit stay were more likely to be discharged to an inpatient facility. Even after accounting for patient- and center-level characteristics, there was substantial variation in discharge disposition across centers (likelihood ratio test: P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Variation in discharge disposition may represent a potential for improvement in resource utilization and cost savings. Further studies are needed to examine the relationship between utilization of postdischarge inpatient facility after trauma and outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Disparities in Health Care Utilization of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injuries Are Related to Insurance, Race, and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To characterize racial/ethnic and insurance disparities in the utilization of healthcare services among US adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

The PubMed database was used to search for articles that directly examined the association between race/ethnicity and insurance disparities and healthcare utilization among patients with TBI. Eleven articles that met the criteria and were published between June 2011 and June 2016 were finally included in the review.

RESULTS

Lack of insurance was significantly associated with decreased use of inhospital and posthospital healthcare services among patients with TBI. However, mixed results were reported for the associations between insurance types and healthcare utilization. The majority of studies reported that racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to use inhospital and posthospital healthcare services, while some studies did not indicate any significant relation between race/ethnicity and healthcare utilization among patients with TBI.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence of a relation between insurance status and healthcare utilization among US adults with TBI. Insurance status may also account for some portion of the relation between race/ethnicity and healthcare utilization.

The Impact of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Treatment and Outcomes of Blunt Splenic Injury

BACKGROUND

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities have been shown to exist in trauma patients. Management of blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) can include splenectomy, embolization, or nonoperative management. This study assesses the effect of race and insurance status on outcomes in patients after blunt splenic trauma.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was used to study patients aged 15-89 y with BSIs from 2013 to 2015. Patients with abbreviated injury scores greater than two in nonabdominal areas, excluding extremities, were eliminated, as were patients with other concomitant abdominal injuries requiring repair. Variables of interest were compared across groups using chi-square tests, and those with significant associations were used in multivariate regression models for each outcome.

RESULTS

We analyzed 13,537 BSI patients. Uninsured patients had increased odds of mortality, more splenic operations, and were less likely to have nonoperative management (P < 0.001). Uninsured patients were also twice as likely to be discharged home and three times as likely to leave against medical advice (P < 0.001). African Americans and Hispanics had higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, CI 1.34-3.08; OR 1.58, CI 1.03-2.44, respectively). African Americans had more splenic operations (OR 1.33, CI 1.08-1.64) and were 60% less likely to receive angioembolization (CI 0.41-0.84). Hispanics had fewer splenic operations (OR 0.79, CI 0.63-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Noteworthy differences exist in the management of splenic trauma patients based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, despite controlling for demographics and injury characteristics. Insurance status and race likely affect surgical treatment plans and mortality, particularly for uninsured, black, and Hispanic patients, but further research is needed to identify the root cause of these disparities.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Discharge to Rehabilitation Following Burn Injury

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to inpatient rehabilitation have been previously described for various injury groups; however, no studies have evaluated whether such disparities exist among burn patients. Their aim was to determine if racial disparities in discharge destination (inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, home with home health, or home) following burn injury existed in this single-institution study. A retrospective analysis of all adult burn patients admitted to UNC Jaycee Burn Center from 2002 to 2012 was conducted. Patient characteristics included age, gender, burn mechanism, insurance status, percentage total body surface area (%TBSA) burned, presence of inhalation injury, and hospital length of stay. Patients were categorized into one of three mutually exclusive racial or ethnic groups: White, Hispanic, or Black. Propensity score weighting followed by ordered logistic regression was performed in the analytical sample and in a subgroup analysis of patients with severe burns (TBSA > 20%). For analysis, 4198 patients were included: 2661 White, 340 Hispanic, and 1197 Black. Propensity weighting resulted in covariate balance among racial groups. Black patients (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.03; P < .001) were more likely than Whites to be discharged to a higher level of rehabilitation, whereas Hispanics were less likely (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.38-1.58; P = .448). In their subgroup analysis, Black (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.07-3.28; P = .026) and Hispanic (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 0.31-7.51; P = .603) patients were more likely to discharge to a higher level of rehabilitation than White patients. Racial and ethnic disparities in discharge destination to a higher level of rehabilitative services among burn-injured patients exist particularly for Hispanic patients but not for Black or White burn patient groups. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential sources of these disparities specifically for Hispanic patients.

Penetrating Colon Trauma Outcomes in Black and White Males

INTRODUCTION

Racial disparities have been both published and disputed in trauma patient mortality, outcomes, and rehabilitation. In this study, the objective was to assess racial disparities in patients with penetrating colon trauma.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was searched for males aged ≥14years from 2010 through 2014 who underwent operative intervention for penetrating colon trauma. The primary outcomes for this study were stoma formation and transfer to rehabilitation; secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality. Analyses were performed in 2016-2018.

RESULTS

There were 7,324 patients identified (4,916 black, 2,408 white). Black and white patients underwent fecal diversion with stoma formation at a similar rate (19.6% vs 18.5%, p=0.28). Black patients were more likely than white patients to be uninsured (self-pay; 37.1% vs 29.9%) and more likely to be injured by firearms (88.3% vs 70.2%, p<0.001), but had a lower overall postoperative morbidity rate (52.6% vs 55.3%, p=0.04). The odds of stoma formation (OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.78, 1.09, p=0.35) and the odds of transfer to rehabilitation (OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.82, 1.30, p=0.78) were similar for black versus white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients experienced similar rates of stoma formation and transfer to rehabilitation as white patients with penetrating colon trauma. Multivariate analysis confirmed expected findings that trauma severity increased the odds of receiving an ostomy and rehabilitation placement. The protocol-based management approach to emergency trauma care potentially decreases the risk for the racial biases that could lead to healthcare disparities.

SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION

This article is part of a supplement entitled African American Men's Health: Research, Practice, and Policy Implications, which is sponsored by the National Institutes of Health.

Socioeconomic Status Affects Outcomes After Severity-Stratified Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status (SES) and race have been shown to increase the incidence of being afflicted by a traumatic brain injury (TBI) resulting in worse posthospitalization outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine the effect disparities have on in-hospital mortality, discharge to inpatient rehabilitation, hospital length of stay (LOS), and TBI procedures performed stratified by severity of TBI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with closed head injuries using the National Trauma Data Bank (2012-2015). Multivariate logistic/linear regression models were created to determine the impact of race and insurance status in groups graded by head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 131,461 TBI patients from NTDB. Uninsured patients experienced greater mortality at an AIS of 5 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.052, P = 0.001). Uninsured patients had a decreased likelihood of being discharged to inpatient rehabilitation with an increasing AIS beginning from an AIS of 2 (OR = 0.987, P = 0.008) to an AIS of 5 (OR = 0.879, P < 0.001). Black patients had an increased LOS as their AIS increased from an AIS of 2 (0.153 d, P < 0.001) to 5 (0.984 d, P < 0.001) with the largest discrepancy in LOS occurring at an AIS of 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in race and SES are associated with differences in mortality, LOS, and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation. Patients with more severe TBI have the greatest divergence in treatment and outcome when stratified by race and ethnicity as well as SES.

Linkage of VA and State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Data to Examine Concurrent Opioid and Sedative-Hypnotic Prescriptions among Veterans

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence of concurrent Veterans Health Administration (VA) and non-VA prescriptions for opioids and sedative-hypnotic medications among post-9/11 veterans in Oregon.

DATA SOURCES

VA health care and prescription data were probabilistically linked with Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study examined concurrent prescriptions among n = 19,959 post-9/11 veterans, by year (2014-2016) and by patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Veterans were included in the cohort for years in which they received VA outpatient care; those receiving hospice or palliative care were excluded. Concurrent prescriptions were defined as ≥1 days of overlap between outpatient prescriptions for opioids and/or sedative-hypnotics (categorized as benzodiazepines vs. non-benzodiazepines).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among 5,882 veterans who filled opioid or sedative-hypnotic prescriptions at VA pharmacies, 1,036 (17.6 percent) filled concurrent prescriptions from non-VA pharmacies. Within drug class, 15.1, 8.8, and 4.6 percent received concurrent VA and non-VA opioids, benzodiazepines, and non-benzodiazepines, respectively. Veteran demographics and clinical diagnoses were associated with the likelihood of concurrent prescriptions, as was enrollment in the Veterans Choice Program.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of post-9/11 veterans receiving VA care in Oregon filled concurrent prescriptions for opioids and sedative-hypnotics. Fragmentation of care may contribute to prescription drug overdose risk among veterans.

Access to post-discharge inpatient care after lower limb trauma

BACKGROUND

Most hospitals in the United States are required to provide emergency care to all patients, regardless of insurance status. However, uninsured patients might be unable to access non-acute services, such as post-discharge inpatient care (PDIC). This could result in prolonged acute hospitalization. We tested the hypothesis that insurance status would be independently associated with both PDIC and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

An observational study was undertaken using the California State Inpatient Database (2007-2011), which captures 98% of patients admitted to hospital in California. All patients with a diagnosis of orthopedic lower limb trauma were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 820-828. Multivariable logistic and generalized linear regression models were used to adjust odds of PDIC and LOS for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 278,573 patients with orthopedic lower limb injuries, 160,828 (57.7%) of which received PDIC. Uninsured patients had lower odds of PDIC (adjusted odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.24) and significantly longer hospital LOS (predicted mean difference 1.06 [95% confidence interval 0.78-1.34] d) than those with private insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of health insurance is associated with reduced access to PDIC and prolonged hospital LOS. This potential barrier to hospital discharge could reduce the number of trauma beds available for acutely injured patients.