Factor Structure of the Agitated Behavior Scale in Traumatic Brain Injury During Posttraumatic Amnesia

Sleep Disturbance During Post-Traumatic Amnesia and Early Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury

After moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), sleep disturbance commonly emerges during the confused post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) recovery stage. However, the evaluation of early sleep disturbance during PTA, its recovery trajectory, and influencing factors is limited. This study aimed to evaluate sleep outcomes in patients experiencing PTA using ambulatory gold-standard polysomnography (PSG) overnight and salivary endogenous melatonin (a hormone that influences the sleep-wake cycle) assessment at two time-points. The relationships between PSG-derived sleep-wake parameters and PTA symptoms (i.e., agitation and cognitive disturbance) were also evaluated. In a patient subset, PSG was repeated after PTA had resolved to assess the trajectory of sleep disturbance. Participants with PTA were recruited from Epworth HealthCare's inpatient TBI Rehabilitation Unit. Trained nurses administered overnight PSG at the patient bedside using the Compumedics Somté portable PSG device (Compumedics, Ltd., Australia). Two weeks after PTA had resolved, PSG was repeated. On a separate evening, two saliva specimens were collected (at 24:00 and 06:00) for melatonin testing. Results of routine daily hospital measures (i.e., Agitated Behavior Scale and Westmead PTA Scale) were also collected. Twenty-nine patients were monitored with PSG (mean: 41.6 days post-TBI; standard deviation [SD]: 28.3). Patients' mean sleep duration was reduced (5.6 h, SD: 1.2), and was fragmented with frequent awakenings (mean: 27.7, SD: 15.0). Deep, slow-wave restorative sleep was reduced, or completely absent (37.9% of patients). The use of PSG did not appear to exacerbate patient agitation or cognitive disturbance. Mean melatonin levels at both time-points were commonly outside of normal reference ranges. After PTA resolved, patients (n = 11) displayed significantly longer mean sleep time (5.3 h [PTA]; 6.5 h [out of PTA], difference between means: 1.2, p = 0.005). However, disturbances to other sleep-wake parameters (e.g., increased awakenings, wake time, and sleep latency) persisted after PTA resolved. This is the first study to evaluate sleep disturbance in a cohort of patients as they progressed through the early TBI recovery phases. There is a clear need for tailored assessment of sleep disturbance during PTA, which currently does not form part of routine hospital assessment, to suggest new treatment paradigms, enhance patient recovery, and reduce its long-term impacts.

Use of Olanzapine to Treat Agitation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Series of N-of-One Trials

Agitation is common during post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with risk of harm to patients and caregivers. Antipsychotics are frequently used to manage agitation in early TBI recovery despite limited evidence to support their efficacy, safety, and impact upon patient outcomes. The sedating and cognitive side effects of these agents are theorized to exacerbate confusion during PTA, leading to prolonged PTA duration and increased agitation. This study, conducted in a subacute inpatient rehabilitation setting, describes the results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy of olanzapine for agitation management during PTA, analyzed as an n-of-1 series. Group comparisons were additionally conducted, examining level of agitation; number of agitated days; agitation at discharge, duration, and depth of PTA; length of hospitalization; cognitive outcome; adverse events; and rescue medication use. Eleven agitated participants in PTA (mean [M] age = 39.82 years, standard deviation [SD] = 20.06; mean time post-injury = 46.09 days, SD = 32.75) received oral olanzapine (n = 5) or placebo (n = 6) for the duration of PTA, beginning at a dose of 5 mg/day and titrated every 3 to 4 days to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day. All participants received recommended environmental management for agitation. A significant decrease in agitation with moderate to very large effect (Tau-U effect size = 0.37-0.86) was observed for three of five participants receiving olanzapine, while no significant reduction in agitation over the PTA period was observed for any participant receiving placebo. Effective olanzapine dose ranged from 5-20 mg. Response to treatment was characterized by lower level of agitation and response to treatment within 3 days. In group analyses, participants receiving olanzapine demonstrated poorer orientation and memory during PTA with large effect size (olanzapine, mean = 9.32, SD = 0.69; placebo, M = 10.68, SD = 0.30; p = .009, d = -2.16), and a trend toward longer PTA duration with large effect size (olanzapine, M = 71.96 days, SD = 20.31; placebo, M = 47.50 days, SD = 11.27; p = 0.072, d = 1.26). No further group comparisons were statistically significant. These results suggest that olanzapine can be effective in reducing agitation during PTA, but not universally so. Importantly, administration of olanzapine during PTA may lead to increased patient confusion, possibly prolonging PTA. When utilizing olanzapine, physicians must therefore balance the possible advantages of agitation management with the possibility that the patient may never respond to the medication and may experience increased confusion, longer PTA and potentially poorer outcomes. Further high-quality research is required to support these findings and the efficacy and outcomes associated with the use of any pharmacological agent for the management of agitation during the PTA period.