Comfort and Adaptation to Silicone Hydrogel Lenses for Daily Wear

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for Ocular Subjective Responses

Purpose

To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for contact lens (CL)-related subjective responses and explore whether MCID values differ between subjective responses and study designs.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of data from seven one-week bilateral crossover studies and 14 one-day contralateral CL studies. For comfort, dryness, vision, or ease of insertion, participants rated on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS) and indicated lens preference on a five-point Likert scale featuring strong, slight, and no preferences. For each criterion, four MCID estimates were calculated and averaged: mean VAS score difference for "slight preference," lower limit of 95% confidence interval VAS score difference for "slight preference," difference in mean VAS score difference between "slight" and "no preference" and 0.5 standard deviation of VAS scores.

Results

The four calculation methods generated a small range of MCID values. For bilateral studies, the averaged MCID was 7.2 (range 5.4-8.8) for comfort, 8.1 (5.2-10.6) for dryness, 7.1 (5.5-9.3) for vision and 7.6 (6.0-10.5) for ease of insertion. For contralateral studies, the averaged MCID was 6.9 (6.1-7.6) for comfort at insertion and 7.5 (6.8-8.2) for end-of-day comfort.

Conclusions

This work demonstrated very similar MCID values across subjective responses and study designs, in a population of habitual soft CL wearers. In all cases, MCID values were on average seven units on a 0 to 100 VAS.

Translational Relevance

This work provides MCID values which are important for interpreting ocular subjective responses and planning clinical studies.

Exploring the factors which impact overall satisfaction with single vision contact lenses

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of subjective factors (lens handling, comfort and vision) on overall single vision contact lens satisfaction.

METHODS

Correlation analysis of a prospective, randomised, double-masked, bilateral crossover study involving 55 adapted lens wearers fitted with somofilcon A (SiHy) (clariti® 1 day, CooperVision) and etafilcon A (Hy) (1 DAY ACUVUE® MOIST, Johnson & Johnson Vision) was conducted. Subjective ratings of lens handling, comfort and vision collected after 1 week of lens wear for each lens type were correlated with overall satisfaction. Data were analysed by combining data for both lens types and also for each lens separately.

RESULTS

For the combined analysis, significant correlations (p < 0.01) were found between subjective ratings of overall satisfaction and ratings of handing for application (r = 0.64), handling for removal (r = 0.50), comfort upon application (r = 0.59), comfort at end of day (r = 0.61), overall satisfaction with comfort (r = 0.88) and overall satisfaction with vision (r = 0.64). Correlation analysis of the per lens data showed that lens specific correlations of overall satisfaction with handling for lens application varied greatly with lens material (SiHy: r = 0.26, p = 0.05 vs Hy: r = 0.72, p < 0.01). Correlation strength of comfort upon application/at end of day with overall satisfaction also varied with lens material (Application: SiHy: r = 0.40 vs Hy: r = 0.61; End of day: SiHy: r = 0.76 vs Hy: r = 0.58; all p ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Overall satisfaction was significantly correlated with the specific subjective evaluations of handling, vision and comfort. Correlations of overall satisfaction and ease of handling for each lens type suggest that, for habitual contact lens wearers, dissatisfaction with handling at the time of lens application can play a major role in overall dissatisfaction with a lens. Handling for application had a similar correlation (r) value as vision, suggesting that handling for application should not be underestimated when considering overall patient satisfaction.

Evaluation of daily disposable senofilcon A contact lenses in a symptomatic population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the comfort performance of ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe™ Technology among symptomatic contact lens wearers by using Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) comfort scores and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 (CLDEQ-8) discomfort and dryness scores.

METHODS

Three clinical trials evaluated comfort and dryness when refitting symptomatic contact lens wearers to ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe™ lenses. This analysis combined the CLUE comfort and CLDEQ-8 scores obtained at baseline and 2-week follow-up and compared average scores between visits. Subjects were grouped by habitual lens modality (daily disposable or daily wear reusable) and habitual lens material (silicone hydrogel or hydrogel). The analysis included data from 107 subjects.

RESULTS

Significant increases in mean CLUE comfort scores between baseline and 2-week follow-up occurred in all subject groups across habitual lens modality and material, indicating an improvement in overall comfort. CLUE comfort score improved clinically (≥5-point increase) among 75.7% of subjects (81/107). Similarly, significant decrease in mean CLDEQ-8 scores between baseline and 2-week follow-up occurred in all subject groups, indicating a decrease in the prevalence of dryness and discomfort symptoms. CLDEQ-8 score improved clinically (≥3-point reduction) among 82.2% of subjects (88/107). A majority of subjects (57.0%) became asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 11 points) after 2 weeks of bilateral wear.

CONCLUSION

Refitting symptomatic contact lens patients to ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe™ can improve overall comfort and reduce symptoms of dryness and discomfort, irrespective of the previous lens modality or habitual lens material.

Addressing common myths and misconceptions in soft contact lens practice

Advances in contact lens technology over the past 50 years since the commercialisation of the first soft lenses in 1971 have been incredible, with significant changes in contact lens materials, frequency of replacement, care systems and lens designs occurring. However, despite the widespread availability of contact lenses, penetration rates for those who need vision correction remain in the low single digits and many practitioners seem to hold on to concepts around the potential value of contact lenses that appear based in the dim and distant past and are certainly no longer valid today. This review addresses 10 common 'myths and misconceptions' around soft contact lenses using an evidence-based approach that can hopefully dispel some of these incorrect assumptions.

Role of the Water Gradient Structure in Inhibiting Thin Aqueous Layer Break in Silicone Hydrogel-Soft Contact Lens

Purpose

Soft contact lenses (SCLs) are effective for refractive error correction, but prolonged wear triggers discomfort and discontinuation. This study investigates whether water gradient technology of delefilcon A-based SCLs improve tear film dynamics.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 50 asymptomatic delefilcon A or narafilcon A users. Data on thin aqueous layer break (TALB; %), noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH; mm), subjective dryness, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were collected. Measurements of the bare eye, the SCL-worn eye after 15 minutes (visit 1 [v1]) and 30 ± 5 days after v1 after SCL was worn for ≥5 hours (visit 2 [v2]) were recorded.

Results

TALB was significantly reduced in the delefilcon A group compared to the narafilcon A group (33.3% vs. 85.5% at v1; P < 0.0001 and 31.7% vs. 80.4% at v2; P < 0.0001). The NIBUT was also significantly higher in the former (4.2 ± 2.1 seconds vs. 2.9 ± 1.5 at v1; P < 0.01 and 4.1 ± 2.3 seconds vs. 2.7 ± 1.6 seconds at v2; P < 0.01) across both visits. The TMH was significantly reduced in the former in both v1 and v2. The total ocular HOAs were significantly lower in the former at v1 (P < 0.001) and v2 (P < 0.05) compared to the bare eye.

Conclusions

The water gradient technology of delefilcon A reduces TALB and increases NIBUT.

Translational Relevance

The use of water gradient technology improves tear film dynamics and alleviate pathological break-up pattern, improving lens performance.

Stabilization of comfort and visual quality after the insertion of soft contact lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate comfort, visual function, and in vivo wettability after the insertion of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses for a better understanding of how long practitioners should wait for the initial evaluation of soft contact lenses.

METHODS

A short-term prospective, contralateral, randomized, and participant-masked study was carried out. Twenty healthy participants (25.4 ± 2.6 years) were evaluated after the insertion of two different soft contact lenses at different times (1, 5, 10, 20, 30 min). Ocufilcon D (hydrogel) and Somofilcon A (silicone hydrogel) contact lenses were randomly assigned to both eyes of the same participant. Comfort, visual function under photopic conditions in terms of high-contrast visual acuity, low-contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and in vivo wettability were measured.

RESULTS

There was an increase in comfort (p < 0.001), high-contrast visual acuity (p < 0.05), and contrast sensitivity (p < 0.001, only with silicone hydrogel) directly related to time after contact lens insertion. Besides, in vivo wettability suffered a statistically significant deterioration directly related to time with both contact lenses (p < 0.05). Except for comfort and contrast sensitivity, all the parameters stabilized their values 10 min after the insertion of both soft contact lenses. Additionally, in vivo wettability and visual acuity differences were found between hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

It would be possible to properly evaluate high-contrast visual acuity, low-contrast visual acuity, and in vivo wettability 10 min after the insertion of both soft contact lenses.

A wearable device to monitor ocular comfort

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate a wearable device (the lens awareness logger, LAL) to record subjective lens awareness during contact lens wear.

METHODS

The LAL is a compact electronic event-logging device incorporating a tactile switch and belt-clip. Forty contact lens wearers (20 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic) took part in a clinical evaluation of the LAL device. Subjects were instructed to wear their habitual soft contact lenses for 2 days (>8 h wear) and use the LAL device. Subjects activated the LAL device immediately prior to lens application and deactivated it following lens removal. If a subject became aware of their contact lenses at any point throughout the wear period they were instructed to depress the button on the LAL device.

RESULTS

The mean number of lens awareness events per hour was 1.3, although there was substantial variation between subjects (standard deviation 1.4). The distribution of lens awareness events throughout the contact lens wearing period showed significantly elevated awareness following lens application and prior to lens removal (p < 0.0001). In addition, symptomatic subjects had a statistically higher percentage of LAL events in the second half of the lens-wearing day compared with asymptomatic subjects (p = 0.02). The LAL findings for each subject appear consistent across the two days (i.e. no fatigue or learning effect). The LAL device was well accepted by subjects with 38 of the 40 subjects reporting it was either 'very easy' or 'fairly easy' to use.

CONCLUSION

The LAL device was able to monitor ocular comfort throughout a period of contact lens wear and was well accepted by subjects. The ability of the LAL device to track ocular awareness events through the day, with high temporal resolution, means it is likely to be a key tool to further understanding of contact lens associated discomfort and dry eye disease.

Eye care professionals' perceptions of the benefits of daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PURPOSE

To gain a better understanding of eye care professionals' (ECPs) perceptions regarding the benefits of silicone hydrogel (SiH) daily disposable contact lenses (DDCL), particularly with respect to health, comfort and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A survey was conducted with 300 ECPs in the United States, United Kingdom and Japan during November 2017. The survey comprised 34 statements relating to SiH DDCLs, to which the ECPs provided their level of agreement using a 6 point Likert scale. A minimum of 70% agreement was set to define majority agreement. Categories of statements included Health, Comfort, Patient Experience, and Standard of Care.

RESULTS

ECPs rated the highest levels of agreement to perceptions within the Patient Experiences and Health categories. The six statements receiving the highest ratings were "Silicone hydrogel 1 day lenses satisfy today's patients' demanding lifestyles" (93% agreement); "Silicone hydrogel 1 day lenses are the best choice to safeguard my patients' eye health related to contact lens wear" (92%); "Silicone hydrogel 1 day lenses provide the best benefits to my patients" (92%); "Silicone hydrogel 1 day lenses provide better long term eye health for my patients than hydrogel 1 day lenses" (91%); "Silicone hydrogel is the healthiest lens material for my daily disposable patients" (90%); and "Silicone hydrogel 1 day lenses provide a better wearing experience for my patients than hydrogel 1 day lenses" (90%).

CONCLUSION

ECPs perceive that SiH DDCLs offer long-term eye health
and comfort for the patient and although the ECPs surveyed would not necessarily prescribe SiH DDCLs to all their patients, they would prescribe them to most of their patients. The results support the premise that while ECPs consider SiH 1 day contact lenses as the current "standard of care"; the principal barrier continues to be the perceived higher cost of these lenses.

Comparison of Silicone Hydrogel and Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

OBJECTIVE

To compare subjective, objective and safety performance of silicone hydrogel (SiHy) daily disposable (DD) with hydrogel (Hy) DD contact lenses.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis on approximately 40 participants (Px) each in 5 trials. Lenses grouped into SiHy (delefilcon A, somofilcon A, narafilcon A) and Hy (omafilcon A, nelfilcon A). Participants attended follow-up visits at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months. Subjective ratings (1-10 scale), adverse events (percentage of Px), physiological variables (0-4 scale), and wearing time were collected at each visit and compared between groups.

RESULT

Trials enrolled 201 Px totally. No differences in age, sex, and lens wear experience were found between SiHy and Hy groups (P≥0.09). There was greater increase in limbal redness from baseline in Hy group (0.18±0.38 vs. 0.02±0.47, P<0.001), whereas conjunctival staining and indentation were less in Hy group (P<0.001). No differences in comfortable wearing time were found between groups (P=0.41), and comfort at insertion, during day, and end of day was also no different (P≥0.71). Incidence of corneal infiltrative events (SiHy vs. Hy: 6.7% vs. 2.5%; P=0.32) and mechanical adverse events (SiHy vs. Hy: 0.0% vs. 0.0%; P=1.00) were no different.

CONCLUSION

Though some statistical significance was found between the groups, these differences were within measurement error. Neither material types showed superiority in comfort, and adverse event rates were low with both material types. These findings suggest that choice of material is a patient and practitioner preference; however, for patients at risk of hypoxia-related complications, SiHy materials should be considered.

Thickness changes in the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer after overnight wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses

BACKGROUND

To investigate thickness changes in the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer after overnight silicone hydrogel contact lens (CL) wear by using ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography (UHROCT).

METHODS

Eleven subjects without CL wearing history were recruited for this study. An UHROCT was used to measure the thickness of the epithelium (ET), Bowman's layer (BT), stroma (ST), and total cornea (CCT) at the center of both eyes. A silicone hydrogel CL was inserted in the right eye of each subject, and the fellow non-CL wearing left eye served as the control. The lens was inserted at 9:30 pm and removed at 8:00 am the next morning. The subjects were evaluated at 9:00 pm (baseline), 9:30 pm (lens insertion), 10:00 pm (before sleep), 7:00 am (waking), 7:30 am, and 8:00 am (lens removal).

RESULTS

Compared to the lens insertion level, the ET of the lens-wearing eye increased by 5.73% at eye opening (P = 0.001). The ET of the non-CL wearing eye and the BT in both eyes did not change after overnight CL wear. Compared to baseline, the CCT of the lens-wearing eye increased by 2.87% upon waking (P = 0.003) and recovered 30 min later (P = 0.555). In contrast, compared to baseline, the CCT of the non-CL wearing eye did not increase upon waking (P = 0.105).

CONCLUSIONS

By using UHROCT, we found that overnight CL wear induced different swelling responses in the various sublayers of the cornea.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered. Registration number: ChiCTR1800015115 . Registered 07 March 2018.

Subjective Ratings and Satisfaction in Contact Lens Wear

SIGNIFICANCE

This study shows satisfaction in contact lens (CL) wear is influenced by both comfort and vision. Eighty-six percent of participants were willing to continue with trial CL wear if satisfied with both comfort and vision, dropping to 50% if either variable was unsatisfactory and 0% if both were unsatisfactory.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to understand the relationship between subjective ratings and satisfaction with CL wear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of two daily-disposable CL trials (delefilcon A, somofilcon A) on participants 40 years or younger followed over 3 months. Subjective ratings (numerical rating scale 1 to 10, 1-point step) collected at visits following baseline (2 weeks, 1 and 3 months) included comfort (insertion, during day, end of day), vision clarity, and binary response for satisfaction with comfort and vision (yes/no). Willingness to continue with trial CL was obtained at completion.

RESULTS

There was no significant association of comfort on insertion with comfort satisfaction (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; P = .30); however, comfort during day (OR, 2.1; P < .001) and end of day (OR, 3.4; P < .001) was associated with comfort satisfaction. For comfort during day ratings of at least 8/10 and end of day of at least 6/10, 90% of participants were considered satisfied. There was a 14% increase in participants satisfied with comfort for each unit increase on the numerical rating scale from ratings of 3 to 8 for comfort during day and a 20% increase from ratings of 3 to 7 for comfort end of day. The percentage of satisfied participants reached its maximum at a lower end of day rating (8/10) compared with during day (10/10). The percentage of participants satisfied with vision reached its maximum (100%) at a vision rating of 9/10.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfaction in CL wear is influenced by both comfort and vision. A higher rating for comfort during the day compared with end of day is necessary for participants to attain satisfaction.

Eyelid Margin and Meibomian Gland Characteristics and Symptoms in Lens Wearers

PURPOSE

To describe the lid margin characteristics of contact lens wearers and relate them to comfort during lens wear.

METHODS

Three study sites enrolled habitual contact lens wearers. Subjects completed the Comfort domain of the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) questionnaire, and each eye was graded for the presence of mucocutaneous junction (MCJ) displacement, lid margin irregularity, and lid margin vascularity. Examiners counted the number of meibomian gland (MG) orifices in the central centimeter of the lower eyelid and the number of those that showed pouting/plugging and vascular invasion. MG expressibility was graded according to the Shimazaki schema. Subjects were grouped based on presence/absence of each characteristic, total number of orifices (≥5 vs. <5), and expressibility (grade 0 vs. >0). Descriptive statistics are reported. A linear model was used to assess the fixed effect of each characteristic on combined CLUE score and each CLUE statement, if the effect on combined CLUE score showed p < 0.10.

RESULTS

The study included 203 subjects (67.5% female) with mean age (±SD) of 30.3 ± 9.6 years. The most commonly observed characteristics were orifice pouting/plugging, compromised MG expressibility, and lid margin vascularity (35.0, 30.3, and 20.4%, respectively). MCJ displacement and MG expressibility had an effect on the combined CLUE score such that individual CLUE statements were analyzed (p = 0.01 and p = 0.06, respectively). MCJ displacement had an effect on comfort upon insertion (p = 0.01), comfort after 5 minutes (p = 0.03), end-of-day comfort (p = 0.01), and ability to maintain ocular moisture (p = 0.030). MG expressibility had a significant effect on general comfort (p = 0.01), comfort throughout the day (p = 0.02), and the ability to maintain ocular moisture (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

MCJ displacement and MG expressibility have an effect on contact lens comfort.

Contact Lens-Induced Discomfort and Inflammatory Mediator Changes in Tears

PURPOSE

Studies indicate that contact lens (CL) discontinuation mostly occurs because of dryness and discomfort symptoms. This study aimed to investigate relationships between changes in the concentration of tear inflammatory mediators with subjective comfort ratings with CL wear and no contact lens wear between morning and evening.

METHOD

Forty-five subjects collected tears twice daily in the morning and in the evening with or without lenses. Comfort was rated subjectively on a scale from 1 to 100 (where 100 was extremely comfortable) just before each tear collection. Tear samples were assayed for complement components (C3 and C3a), leukotriene B4 (LTB4), secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2), secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), and bradykinin using commercially available immuno-based assay kits.

RESULTS

Comfort ratings showed a statistically significant decline from morning to evening both with CL (89.0±10.1 AM vs. 76.7±15.2 PM; P<0.001) and without CL (89.1±10.2 AM vs. 84.2±12.6 PM; P<0.005) wear. The decline was steeper with lens wear (P<0.001). Bradykinin and sPLA2 levels did not change between morning and evening or with CL wear (P>0.05). Leukotriene B4 levels were slightly higher in CL (CL 43.4±12.6 pg/ml vs. No CL 39.4±13.4 pg/mL; P=0.034), whereas the concentration of LTB4, C3, C3a, and sIgA dropped by the end of the day in the presence or absence of lens wear (P<0.001). For most mediators, tear levels were not correlated with comfort ratings in any of the conditions. Leukotriene B4 had a higher concentration in the evening, and when measured as a ratio to sIgA, there was a trend for increased concentration of this mediator during CL wear.

CONCLUSION

Although specific mediators showed changes from morning to evening with and without lens wear, most of these were not correlated with subjective comfort ratings in lens wear. The only mediator that showed an increase in concentration during the day and during lens wear was LTB4, and further studies on this mediator are warranted.

Impact of Contact Lens Material, Design, and Fitting on Discomfort

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of contact lens (CL) material, design, and fitting characteristics on CL discomfort.

METHODS

A PubMed search identified publications describing subjective comfort and CL material, fitting, and design parameters. The review included clinical signs associated with discomfort that may be a consequence of these parameters.

RESULTS

Reduced lens movement or more CL tightness were associated with improved comfort. Increased lens-induced paralimbal conjunctival staining and indentation, considered as quasi-indicators of CL fitting or edge design, were also associated with better comfort. No recent studies have evaluated varying CL design parameters and subjective comfort. Silicone hydrogel CLs are no different in comfort compared with hydrogel CLs. Lower equilibrium water content is associated with improved comfort in hydrogel CL wear. Coefficient of friction shows promise as a material factor potentially associated with comfort. Lid wiper epitheliopathy and lid-parallel conjunctival folds have been linked with comfort in established wearers.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent studies have confirmed the association between more mobile CLs and more discomfort, whereas closer conformity of the CL to the bulbar conjunctiva improved subjective comfort. There is no evidence to support the perceived comfort difference between silicone hydrogel and hydrogel CL. There has been limited progress in understanding the impact of varying specific CL design parameters. Although specific clinical signs may be predictive of discomfort, their role in the natural history of discomfort remains unclear. A better understanding of the relationship between coefficient of friction and comfort and strategies to improve lubricity may hold promise for limiting CL discomfort.

Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses as an Indicator of Contact Lens Discomfort

PURPOSE

To analyze quantitatively the alterations in the microvascular network of the upper tarsal conjunctiva, lid wiper, and bulbar conjunctiva relative to ocular discomfort after contact lens wear.

DESIGN

A prospective, crossover clinical study.

METHODS

Functional slit-lamp biomicroscopy was used to image the microvascular network of the upper tarsal conjunctiva, lid wiper, and bulbar conjunctiva. The microvascular network was automatically segmented, and fractal analyses were performed to yield the fractal dimension (D_box) that represented vessel density. Sixteen healthy subjects (9 female and 7 male) with an average age of 35.5 ± 6.7 years (mean ± standard deviation) were recruited. The right eye was imaged at 9 AM and 3 PM at the first visit (day 1) when the subject was not wearing contact lenses. During the second visit (day 2), the right eye was fitted with a contact lens for 6 hours. Microvascular imaging was performed before (at 9 AM) and after lens wear (at 3 PM). Ocular comfort was rated using a 50-point visual analog scale before and after 6 hours of lens wear, and its relationships with microvascular parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in D_box among the upper tarsal conjunctiva, lid wiper, and bulbar conjunctiva among the measurements at 9 AM (day 1 and day 2) and 3 PM (day 1) when the subjects were not wearing the lenses (P > .05), whereas after 6 hours of lens wear, the microvascular network densities were increased in all 3 of these locations. D_box of the lid wiper increased from 1.411 ± 0.116 to 1.548 ± 0.079 after 6 hours of contact lens wear (P < .01). D_box of the tarsal conjunctiva was 1.731 ± 0.026 at baseline and increased to 1.740 ± 0.030 (P < .05). D_box of the bulbar conjunctiva increased from 1.587 ± 0.059 to 1.632 ± 0.060 (P < .001). The decrease in ocular discomfort was strongly related to the D_box change in the lid wiper (r = 0.61, P < .05). There were no correlations between the changes of ocular comfort and the microvascular network densities of either the tarsal or bulbar conjunctivas (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to show that the microvascular network of the lid wiper can be quantitatively analyzed in contact lens wearers. The microvascular responses of the lid wiper were significantly correlated with contact lens discomfort.

Longitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density of the cornea and conjunctiva in contact lens-induced dry eye

BACKGROUND

The aim was to determine longitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density (LCD) in the human cornea and conjunctiva during asymptomatic and symptomatic contact lens wear.

METHODS

Twenty-five participants with contact lens-induced dry eye (CLIDE) and 35 without CLIDE (NO-CLIDE), diagnosed using a range of symptom questionnaires and objective tests (tear film break up, cotton thread tear test and corneal staining) were enrolled. The central cornea and nasal bulbar conjunctiva were examined using a Heidelberg laser scanning confocal microscope at baseline and following one, four and 24 weeks wear of daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses. Twenty-three non-contact lens-wearing controls were also examined. Langerhans cells were counted manually from randomly selected images.

RESULTS

In the cornea, mean and standard error of the mean LCD was greater after one week of lens wear in CLIDE (55 ± 7 cells/mm² ) versus NO-CLIDE (43 ± 4 cells/mm² ) (p = 0.041) and controls (27 ± 4 cells/mm² ) (p < 0.001). LCD was also greater in NO-CLIDE versus controls (p = 0.010). At week 4, LCD was greater in CLIDE (41 ± 6 cells/mm² ) versus controls (27 ± 4 cells/mm² ) (p = 0.004). There were no other significant differences between groups at weeks four or 24. In the conjunctiva, LCD was greater after one week of lens wear in CLIDE (17 ± 1 cells/mm² ) (p = 0.003) and NO-CLIDE (17 ± 3 cells/mm² ) (p = 0.001) versus controls (7 ± 1 cells/mm² ). There were no significant differences between groups at weeks four or 24.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial transient increase in corneal and conjunctival LCD in CLIDE (versus NO-CLIDE) suggests an inflammatory component in the aetiology of this condition.

Lid wiper epitheliopathy

Some recent research has resulted in a hypothesis that there is a common 'lid wiper' region that is apposite to the ocular surface or anterior lens surface (where contact lenses are worn), responsible for spreading tears during blinking. In the upper eyelid, it extends about 0.6 mm from the crest of the sharp posterior (inner) lid border (i.e. the mucocutaneous junction, or line of Marx) to the subtarsal fold superiorly and from the medial upper punctum to the lateral canthus horizontally. Histologically, it is seen as an epithelial elevation comprising of stratified epithelium with a transitional conjunctival structure of (moving posteriorly) squamous cells then cuboidal cells, with some parakeratinised cells and goblet cells. Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) denotes staining of the lid wiper observed after instillation of dyes such as fluorescein, rose bengal or lissamine green. There have been some reports of higher rates of LWE in dry eye patients and contact lens wearers, but others have failed to find such associations. The primary cause of LWE is thought to be increased friction between the lid wiper and ocular or anterior contact lens surface due to inadequate lubrication, which could be caused by dry eye and may be exacerbated by factors such as abnormal blinking patterns, poor contact lens surface lubricity and adverse environmental influences. Recent evidence suggests that LWE is associated with sub-clinical inflammation. LWE has the potential to provide the missing mechanistic link between clinical observation and symptoms associated with dry eye and contact lens wear. Clinical and fundamental research into LWE is still in its infancy and in many instances equivocal; however, it is an idea that provides a potentially important new avenue for further investigation of anterior eye discomfort associated with ocular dryness and contact lens wear.

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution on silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS) with a formulation that includes aloe vera on its composition.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial with a crossover design that included seven examinations. Two different MPDSs, Avizor Alvera® (study solution) and All Clean Soft® (control solution), each were used for 1 month. Comfilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses were used during the trial. The main outcome variables were corneal staining and deposits on the surfaces of the contact lenses. Other parameters including ocular surface response, contact lens wettability, user satisfaction, and adverse events, were analyzed according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 11980:2010 guidance for clinical investigation.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects (10 women, 10 men) (mean age, 27.7±5.6 years; range, 20-41) were included. No differences between both MPDSs were found in the percentage of subjects with corneal staining >0 at day 30 (study: 35%, control: 50%; p=0.46); neither in the percentage of subjects with deposits on the surface of the contact lens >0 at day 30 (study: 26.32%, control: 52.63%; p=0.18). The study MPDS received higher rates in comfort (study: 8.14±1.09, control: 7.94±0.92; p=0.56) and satisfaction at day 30 (study: 8.63±0.91, control: 8.29±0.80; p=0.19), however the scores were not significantly different with the control MPDS.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical trial showed that the study MPDS is safe, efficient, and has acceptable physiologic tolerance, according to the ISO 11980:2010 guidance for clinical investigation.

Estimating tear film spread and stability through tear hydrodynamics

PURPOSE

The stability and ease of spread of the tear-film over the contact lens surface may be an indicator of contact lens surface dewetting. The present in vivo methods of determining lens dewetting are complex. This study introduces a novel and objective way of determining the upward spread and stability of the tear-film through measurement of tear-film particle dynamics.

METHODS

Ten adapted contact lens wearers wore the same type of contact lens. Using a video camera mounted to a slit-lamp, the tear-film spread over the lens surface was recorded after a blink, at 8× magnification and capture rate of 30 frames per second, at morning after lens insertion, and after 8 h of lens wear. Images from 20 videos, without blinks and without an observable change in fixation were analyzed without any further postprocessing of the images. Using a customized calibrated ImageJ macro for particle tracking, the velocity of naturally occurring reflective particles was determined. The results were analyzed using the R program and ProFit.

RESULTS

The results established that the upward particle velocity was highest immediately after a blink and declined with time. The spread of the tear film measured through upward particle velocity was different on lens insertion than after 8 h of lens wear (p = 0.001). The exponential time constants ± SE were 346.02 ± 29.0 for lens insertion at morning and 1413.13 ± 419.6 after 8 h of lens wear.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel and non-invasive way to measure in vivo spread and stability of the prelens tear-film has been developed. Additional studies are needed to understand whether this simple measure is able to differentiate the performance of different soft contact lenses and how this method may help in the understanding other aspects of lens performance such as non-invasive tear breakup time, surface deposition, and lens comfort.

Factors influencing the electronic capture of patient-reported contact lens performance data

PURPOSE

Electronic data capture is becoming increasingly common for collecting real-time patient responses. The purpose of this study was to investigate compliance with a daily electronic questionnaire regarding night-time contact lens visual performance.

METHOD

Forty-eight subjects (34 females) were fit and dispensed two contralateral pairs of soft contact lenses (SCLs) for one week each. Subjects were sent a nightly e-mail at 8PM containing a secure, individualized link to an electronic questionnaire asking 30 questions of varying response styles (e.g., multiple choice, short answer, etc.) about SCL visual performance. Subjects were instructed to complete the questionnaire before going to bed.

RESULTS

The overall completion rate based on 676 electronic questionnaires was 95.1%. Of these, only 3.6% were completed late (<24h). The percentage of subjects completing all questionnaires was significantly higher on weekdays (96.5%; Sunday through Thursday) than on weekends (91.1%; Friday and Saturday). Fisher exact tests indicated no significant association with gender for either weekday (p=0.25) or weekend (p=0.73). Although odds ratio estimates suggested that participants 23 and older were more likely to complete the questionnaire (weekday: OR=4.39, p=0.10; weekend: OR=2.93, p=0.19), these associations did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

E-mail based questionnaires provide an effective method for acquiring time specific responses, making them a viable clinical and research tool. The day(s) of the week on which assessments occur need to be strongly considered, as on-time compliance may be affected on weekend evenings, or possibly situations in which a typical schedule may not be followed.

Are silicone hydrogel contact lenses more comfortable than hydrogel contact lenses?

The current literature review was intended to investigate whether the use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses has resulted in improved comfort compared with that of hydrogel contact lenses when both are used for daily wear. The conclusion reached is that silicone hydrogel contact lenses, which were initially developed to eliminate hypoxia during overnight wear, have not significantly improved comfort compared with the comfort achieved with hydrogel contact lenses when worn on a daily wear basis, even though a body of the published literature would suggest to the contrary. A careful review and consideration of the literature demonstrates that the relative comfort achieved with the two types of contact lenses is in fact highly dependent on the study methodology: Although refitting studies have concluded enhanced comfort with silicone hydrogels, the more robust study designs involving concurrent controls and masking were not able to show a difference, and some even concluded an inferior performance. Evidence-based review has however clearly demonstrated that comfort cannot be considered in isolation but is contact lens specific and depends on the material surface and bulk properties, lens design characteristics, and modality of use of the contact lens, and may also be significantly influenced by the replacement frequency and interaction with any lens care system that may be used.

Ocular tolerance of a new multipurpose solution specifically formulated for daily wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, physiological performance, and effect on ocular tissues of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS) specifically formulated for use with silicone hydrogel (SH) contact lenses (CL).

METHODS

Two MPDS [solution A (Solo-care Aqua(®), Ciba-Vision) and solution B (Hidro Health(®), Disop)] were randomly assigned and prescribed in a clinical trial in a crossover clinical trial (Registered #293/07/EC; Spanish National Health Department). Only lotrafilcon B CL daily wearers were included. After each solution was used, a masked investigator assessed the slit-lamp findings (SL9, Topcon Inc.), lens deposits, and wettability according to the Guidance for clinical investigation (ISO 11980). CL daily wearing time (hours per day and days per week) were recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-four daily wearers were included. Average CL wear time was 8.3 ± 2.3 (CI95% 7.9-8.7) hours per day (8.5 ± 2.7 at baseline visit, 8.2 ± 1.9 with solution A, and 8.4 ± 2.2 with solution B). The average number of days per week of CL wear was 5.9 ± 1.3 (CI95% 5.6-6.1) (5.4 ± 1.6 at baseline visit, 6.1 ± 0.9 with solution A, and 6.0 ± 1.1 with solution B). Non-adverse slit-lamp findings were recorded (higher than 2 points). No statistical difference (P>0.05 Friedman test) in CL wearing time, number of days of CL wears and slit-lamp findings were found between the two solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial shows that the new formulation of Hidro Health(®) MPDS is safe when used for the care of daily-wear lotrafilcon B CL. This new solution has no clinical significance on ocular tissues, according to the Guidance for clinical investigation (ISO 11980).

Comfort and vision with silicone hydrogel lenses: effect of compliance

PURPOSE

Silicone hydrogel (SH) lenses are usually replaced after 2 weeks (2W) or 1 month (1M); however, many patients do not comply with the manufacturers' recommended replacement frequency (MRRF). The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the effect of compliance with MRRF on comfort and vision in SH wearers.

METHODS

As a part of a larger study investigating compliance with MRRF, patients were asked to rate their subjective comfort and vision from 0 (very poor) to 10 (excellent) in the morning, at the end of the day (EVE), when lenses were new, and needed replacing (NR).

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred forty-four patients wore 2W replacement modality (2WR) (n = 717) or 1M replacement modality (1MR) (n = 617) SH lenses. Comfort and vision in the morning and when lenses are new were significantly higher than for EVE and NR (p < 0.001). Twenty-nine percent (95% confidence interval 25.3-32.4) of 1MR and 59% (95% confidence interval 55.5-62.7) of 2WR wearers were non-compliant with the MRRF. Compliance had a significant effect on EVE (p = 0.002, p = 0.008) and NR (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) comfort and vision. After accounting for compliance, EVE and NR comfort and EVE vision were higher for 1MR than 2WR (p = 0.015, p = 0.044, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliant patients had better EVE and NR comfort and vision than non-compliant patients, regardless of replacement modality. Optimal subjective performance with SH lenses seems to be facilitated by replacing lenses as recommended.

Visual and optical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses for moderate myopia

Purpose

To compare the short-term visual and optical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses for myopia ≥ −3.00D.

Methods

This was a short-term, non-dispense, double-masked, randomized study investigating Night&Day (ND), PureVision (PV), O2 Optix (O2), Biofinity (BF), Acuvue Advance (AA) and Acuvue OASYS for myopia ≥ −3.00D. Testing was conducted under scotopic conditions. Measures (one eye only) included: high- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA/LCVA), contrast sensitivity, subjective clarity of vision ratings (0-100 scale using reference images, with test image representing grade 50) and ocular aberrations (up to the 4th order, analyzed across individual scotopic pupil sizes).

Results

Three males and 27 females participated, with a mean (± SD) age of 24.9 ± 7.7 yrs (range 19 to 53 yrs), sphere of −5.30 ± 1.73D (range −3.00 to −10.75D) and cylinder −0.36 ± 0.23D (range 0 to −0.75D). Mean (± SEM) logMAR HCVA ranged from 0.06 (PV) to 0.10 (AA) (± 0.02), LCVA from 0.33 (BF) to 0.40 (AA) (± 0.02) and contrast sensitivity from 2.33 (BF) to 2.53 (ND) (± 0.15) (differences not statistically significant; all p > 0.05). Subjective ratings for the test image ranged from 59 (PV) to 64 (ND) (± 4) and 56 (AA) to 65 (ND) (± 4), for monochromatic and polychromatic reference images, respectively (all p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant impact on ocular aberrations with all study lenses compared to no lens. Between-lens differences were statistically significant for defocus (Z⁰₂), horizontal coma (Z ¹₃) and spherical aberration (Z⁰₄).

Conclusions

Despite some differences in ocular aberrations, there were no significant differences in HCVA, LCVA, contrast sensitivity or subjective ratings across lenses.