Endothelial Cell Loss After Needle-Push Insertion Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK)

Size and Shape Matter: Cell Viability of Preloaded Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts in Three Different Carriers

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine endothelial cell loss (ECL) associated with preloaded Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) grafts loaded into 3 carriers of different size and shape.

METHODS

Thirty-six donor corneas were prepared for DSAEK and loaded into an EndoGlide Ultrathin (control) (2.0 mm × 3.5 mm lumen, 4.5 mm/4.9 mm incision for scleral tunnel/clear corneal insertion), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty EndoGlide (experimental) (1.1 mm × 1.7 mm lumen, 2.65 mm incision), or round glass Jones tube (experimental) (1.8 mm lumen, 3.0 mm incision). Control grafts were stored for 6 days in Optisol-GS and experimental grafts stored for 24 hours in Life4C before analysis using Calcein AM staining. Grafts were imaged and ECL was analyzed by FIJI segmentation. The statistical significance of ECL was determined using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in donor characteristics for grafts in each cohort. ECL for grafts loaded into the EndoGlide Ultrathin was 10.3% ± 2.3% (graft thickness: 60-189 μm, n = 9). ECL for grafts loaded into the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty EndoGlide was 22.2% ± 7.1% (graft thickness: 38-63 μm, n = 9). ECL for thin grafts (34-60 μm, n = 9) loaded into the Jones tube was 24.0% ± 5.0%. ECL for thick grafts (92-119 μm, n = 9) loaded into the Jones tube was 34.2% ± 6.1% ECL ( P < 0.001). Combined regression analysis revealed that graft thickness is directly correlated to ECL ( P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The size and shape of the carrier can influence the cell viability of preloaded DSAEK grafts. Compared with a larger carrier, smaller lumen carriers are associated with greater ECL. In smaller lumen carriers, ECL increases with increasing DSAEK graft thickness.

"Air-Assisted" Donor Lenticule Insertion in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in Aphakia With Large Iris Defect and Without Posterior Capsular Support

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report a novel technique of donor lenticule insertion in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in aphakic corneal edema with large iris defect and without any posterior capsular support.

METHODS

This was a retrospective consecutive interventional case series. Clinical records of ten 1-eyed aphakic patients with corneal edema with large iris defect and no capsular support who underwent air-assisted donor lenticule insertion in DSEK were evaluated. After making 6.0- to 6.5-mm sclerocorneal tunnel and 2 side ports, limited anterior vitrectomy was performed if required. Then, Descemetorhexis was performed under air through side ports. Manually dissected donor lenticule was inserted into the anterior chamber under full-chamber air by a 30-G needle push-in technique. Further air tamponade was given if necessary. No fluid-air exchange was performed. The patient was kept on the same operating table for at least 1 hour and then shifted. Graft attachments in early postoperative period, corrected distant visual acuity, and endothelial cell density after 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative follow-up period was 19.2 ± 6.7 months. There was no donor dislocation in this small group. All patients achieved a corrected distant visual acuity of 0.70 (20/100) after 3 months and maintained until 12 months. The endothelial cell density at 3 months (n = 8) was 2028 ± 151/mm 2 , at 6 months (n = 7) 1776 ± 198/mm 2 , and at 12 months (n = 7) 1721 ± 172/mm 2 . The corresponding endothelial cell loss was 25.8% ± 5.6%, 34.4% ± 5.1%, and 37.8% ± 7.1%, respectively. One graft failed after 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

"Air-assisted" donor lenticule insertion in DSEK is a safe surgical technique in aphakic patients with corneal edema with large iris defect and no capsular support.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pediatric Age Group: A Decade of Our Experience

PURPOSE

This study was to report the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in managing corneal endothelial disorders in children less than 14 years of age.

METHODS

Medical records of 180 DSAEK performed, between 2008 and 2020, on 167 eyes of 111 children who had a visually significant endothelial dysfunction were retrospectively reviewed for the primary etiology of corneal decompensation, time of the onset and duration of cloudiness, preoperative visual acuity, the technique of endothelial keratoplasty, surgical modifications, and reintervention.

RESULTS

Median age at surgical intervention was 7.9 years (interquartile range, 5.2-11.2 years). At a median postinterventional follow-up of 2.5 years (interquartile range, 0.9-3.4 years), 86.2% (144 of 167 eyes, 95% confidence interval 79.9%-90.1%) maintained a clear graft. Median best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved from 1.45 ± 0.70 preoperatively to 0.90 ± 0.06 at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.0001). The cumulative overall long-term graft survival was 92.7%, 86.5%, and 77.7% at 1, 3, and 7 years, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the indication for DSAEK (P = 0.007; hazards ratio: 2.17 ± 0.62), age at surgery (P = 0.02; hazards ratio: 0.87 ± 0.05), and any subsequent intervention after DSAEK (P = 0.003; hazards ratio: 0.11 ± 0.08) were significant risk factors for DSAEK failure. The endothelial cell loss was 40.1% at 6 months, 45.4% at 1 year, 55.2% at 5 years, and 61.9% at 7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

DSAEK is a safe and effective surgical strategy in managing endothelial disorders among the pediatric age group.

A modified surgical technique for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in altered or abnormal anatomy

Purpose

This paper describes a modified technique for the Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratopasty (DSAEK) surgery in eyes with abnormal or altered anatomy. Certain anatomic abnormalities increase the level of surgical complexity, and lead to increased risk of donor lenticule detachment. These challenges include aniridia, abnormal iris, aphakia and hypotony from previous vitrectomy.

Observations

The Sheets glide was trimmed to 4mm in width and inserted into the clear-corneal wound. The “needle-push”/Fichman glide technique was used to insert the DSAEK donor graft. The modification of the technique involves maintaining the Sheets glide in the eye for the duration of the intraoperative air bubble. After confirming desired orientation of the graft, air was injected into the anterior chamber, creating a large air bubble between the graft and the Sheets glide. After 10 minutes, the Sheets glide was removed, and the main wound was closed.

Conclusions and Importance

This technique overcomes the challenges of posterior air bubble migration and posterior dislocation of the donor lenticule in eyes with altered anatomy.