Cervical occupational hazards in ophthalmic plastic surgery

Exoscope-assisted orbital fracture reduction surgery-Clinical assessment by surgeons: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Exoscope-assisted digital imaging allows continuous real-time visualization of the surgical site on a large 3D monitor. We evaluated its usefulness in orbital fracture reduction surgery, a procedure with a narrow and deep operative field that restricts direct visibility for the operating surgeon.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent orbital floor fracture reduction with an absorbable plate via a subciliary approach at our institution from January 2022 to December 2024. ORBEYE 3D exoscope system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used in all cases when available, as the device was shared among several departments in our institution. Surgeries performed with and without the ORBEYE exoscope were compared for the following preoperative variables: (i) years since the surgeon's graduation and (ii) days from injury to surgery, and outcome variables including (iii) operative time, (iv) blood loss, and (v) absorbable plate size. Surgeons also completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with ORBEYE.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent conventional surgery, and 10 underwent ORBEYE-assisted surgery. ORBEYE-assisted surgery resulted in a significantly shorter operative time, while no significant differences were observed in other preoperative or outcome variables. The involved surgeons reported reduced physical strain, particularly in the neck, as well as improved collaboration and education. Despite some disadvantages, all surgeons expressed a positive attitude toward continued ORBEYE use.

CONCLUSIONS

ORBEYE-assisted surgery offers significant advantages in orbital floor fracture reduction, including reduced operative time, improved ergonomics, and enhanced teamwork and education. Its drawbacks are relatively minor, and broader adoption in plastic surgery should be considered.

Biomechanical and ergonomic risks associated with cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction amongst surgeons: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons are at high risk of developing musculoskeletal symptoms due to a range of factors including, maladaptive positioning and surgical ergonomics. Cervical muscle strain and biomechanical load is most prevalent due to repetitive motions and prolonged static neck positioning. This issue is apparent through reports of prevalence between 10 and 74.4% among surgeons. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an objective assessment of the clinical evidence available and a descriptive analysis of the effects of kinematics and surgical ergonomics on the prevalence of surgeons' cervical musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

This is PRISMA-compliant systematic review of clinical studies assessing the prevalence of cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction in surgeons by searching PUBMED and Ovid EMBASE databases from inception to 19th October 2023. Study quality was graded according to the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. The use of loupes, open surgery and excessive neck flexion (>30°) were associated with cervical dysfunction. Comparison of study outcomes was challenging due to heterogeneity within study methods and the paucity of methodological quality.

CONCLUSION

The current literature assessing ergonomic and biomechanical factors predisposing surgeons to cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction is insufficient to provide reliable guidance for clinicians. Although the literature identifies factors contributing to work-related cervical dysfunction, few attempt to evaluate interventions for improved surgical ergonomics. An objective assessment of interventions that prompt postural correction with the aim to improve neck pain in surgeon cohorts is warranted.

Ergonomics and performance of using prismatic loupes in simulated surgical tasks among surgeons - a randomized controlled, cross-over trial

Introduction

Recently developed prismatic loupes may mitigate the high physical workload and risk of neck disorders associated with traditional surgical loupes among surgeons. However, research in this area, particularly among surgeons, is sparse. This study examines the impact of prismatic loupes on surgeons' physical workload, musculoskeletal discomfort, and performance during simulated surgical tasks.

Materials and methods

Nineteen out of twenty recruited surgeons performed three tasks in a fixed-order with their own loupes and both low-tilt (LT) and high-tilt (HT) prismatic loupes, in a randomized order. The primary outcomes were the median inclination angles and velocities of the head, trunk, and upper arms, along with the median muscle activity of the cervical erector spinae (CES), upper trapezius (UT), and lumbar erector spinae (LES) for each pair of loupes. The secondary outcomes included performance (completion time and errors), perceived body-part discomfort, and subjective evaluation of the three pairs of loupes.

Results

Using prismatic loupes, either LT or HT, compared with the surgeons' own loupes yielded lower head inclinations (all p < 0.001), lower neck muscle activity (all p < 0.05), and lower neck discomfort in indirect comparisons (p < 0.01) with no significant difference in surgical errors (p = 0.628). However, HT loupes resulted in a longer task completion time in two tasks (p < 0.001). Most surgeons preferred LT loupes (N = 12) for their comfort and visual functions.

Discussion

The results indicate that prismatic loupes can reduce physical workload in the neck during simulated surgical task, with no significant difference in surgical errors. Future studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of prismatic loupes among surgeons.

Ergonomics of Ophthalmic Surgery: Evaluating the Effect of a Posture Trainer on Trainee Intraoperative Back Posture

Purpose  Ophthalmic surgeons are at an increased risk for musculoskeletal disorders resulting from ophthalmology-specific routines and equipment, which have become widely associated with poor posture. The purpose of this study was to observe the effect that a commercially available posture trainer, Upright Go, can have on the improvement of posture of ophthalmic surgeons. Methods  Eight ophthalmologists-in-training were studied over a period of 4 weeks during their surgical rotations between September 2020 and June 2021. Participants underwent an "observation" period, followed by a 2-week "training" period, then a final "testing" period. The percentage of time users spent upright intraoperatively pre- and posttraining was evaluated. Pre- and poststudy surveys were also administered to help measure participant satisfaction and self-reported changes in posture. Results  All eight participants demonstrated an increase in the percentage of time spent upright after the training period. Across all participants, the total average percentage spent upright in the observation period was 59.8%, while in the testing period was 87.1%, resulting in an average improvement of 27.3% of time spent in an upright position after the completion of the training period ( p  < 0.0001). The range of improvement of time spent upright was 16.0 to 46.5%. Conclusion  This cohort study utilized the Upright Go device to help determine the effect that its training could have on the improvement of posture in ophthalmic surgeons. The results indicated a significant increase in the average proportion of time spent with upright posture compared after the training period.

Preventing work-related musculoskeletal injuries among oral and maxillofacial surgeons

BACKGROUND

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS) are continually required to adjust position and posture to access the limited surgical field in and around the head and neck, oral cavity, and oropharynx. Very limited data exists that quantifies the burden of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) among OMS.

OBJECTIVE

This exploratory study seeks to address these literature gaps by assessing the prevalence of MSD among OMS.

METHOD

A 12-question survey was designed to investigate the prevalence of MSD for OMS, including residents in training, actively practicing surgeons, and retired surgeons. Seventy-six surveys were distributed and completed in person by surgeons attending professional conferences from September 2018-September 2019. Survey questions included the Baker-Wong Faces pain scale, years in practice, number of hours worked per week, job tenure, pain attributable to work, and age. The Nordic scale identified and delineated anatomic site of musculoskeletal complaints, duration and treatment sought.

RESULTS

The most frequently cited sources and locations of pain attributable to occupation were shoulders, neck, and lower back. The risk of MSD symptoms was relatively two-fold [PR = 2.54, 95% CI = 0.90, 7.22] among OMS in practice for more than ten years compared to those in practice less than ten years. After adjusting for age and hours worked per week as potential confounders, the risk of MSD symptoms was higher among OMS in practice for more than ten years compared to those with less than ten years of experience, despite no statistically significant association.

CONCLUSION

OMS are impacted by a high prevalence of MSD. The neck, shoulder, and lower back are the most frequently affected with discomfort and pain. This study found that practicing oral and maxillofacial surgery for more than 10 years is a potential risk factor for experiencing MSD.

Characterizing exposure to physical risk factors during veterinary surgery with wearable sensors: a pilot study

Occupational ApplicationsVeterinarians provide comprehensive health services for animals, but despite exposure to similar occupational and safety hazards as medical physicians, physical risk factors for these doctors and healthcare teams have not been characterized. In this pilot study, we used wearable sensor technology and showed that veterinary surgeons commonly experience static and demanding postures while performing soft tissue and orthopedic surgeries. Observations showed that muscle activation was highest in the right trapezius. Job factors such as surgical role (attending vs. assisting) and surgical specialty (soft tissue vs. orthopedics) appeared to influence exposure to physical risk factors. These findings suggest a need to consider the unique demands of surgical specialties in order to address the key risk factors impacting injury risks among veterinarians. For example, static postures may be a priority for soft tissue surgeons, while tools that reduce force requirements are more pressing for orthopedic surgeons.Technical AbstractBackground: Although musculoskeletal fatigue, pain, and injuries are commonly reported among surgeons in veterinary medicine, few studies have objectively characterized the exposure to physical risk factors among veterinary surgeons.Purpose: This study aimed to characterize muscle activation and postures of the neck and shoulders during live veterinary surgeries in the soft tissue and orthopedic specialties.Methods: Forty-four ergonomic exposure assessments (exposures) were collected during 26 surgical procedures across five surgeons. Exposures were collected from both soft tissue (n = 23) and orthopedic (n = 21) specialties. Physical risk factors were characterized by: 1) directly measuring muscle activation and posture of the neck and shoulders, using surface electromyography and inertial measurement units, respectively; and 2) collecting self-reported workload, pain, and stiffness.Results: Across the 44 exposures, neck and back symptoms respectively worsened after the surgery in 27% and 14% of the exposures. Veterinary surgeons exhibited neck postures involving a mean of 17° flexion during the surgical procedures. Static postures were common, occurring during 53-80% of the procedures. Compared to soft tissue procedures (e.g., 13.2% MVC in the right trapezius), higher muscle activity was observed during orthopaedic procedures (e.g., 27.6% MVC in the right trapezius).Conclusions: This pilot study showed that physical risk factors (i.e., muscle activity and posture of the neck/shoulder) can be measured using wearable sensors during live veterinary surgeries. The observed risk factors were similar to those documented for medical physicians. Further studies are needed to bring awareness to opportunities for improving workplace ergonomics in veterinary medicine and surgery.

Ergonomics Among Craniofacial Surgeons: A Survey of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Injury

INTRODUCTION

Surgical procedures with loupe magnification, headlights, and microscopes expose craniofacial surgeons to mechanical stress that can increase risk of long-term musculoskeletal pain and injury. Identifying the prevalence and cause of work-related musculoskeletal discomfort may guide preventative strategies to prolong well-being, job satisfaction, and greater duration of surgical careers.

METHODS

A 29-question online survey was distributed to the surgeon members of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Eight hundred seventy-three surveys were distributed, and the anonymous responses were recorded using Google forms.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six unique responses were recorded (22.5% response rate). A total of 64.2% reported experiencing musculoskeletal symptoms during their career, with neck, lower back, and shoulders being the most common problem areas. Multivariate analysis demonstrated surgical loupes (odds ratio 2.36, P = 0.03) and length of surgical practice >15 years (odds ratio 1.95, P = 0.04) were independently associated with greater odds of developing symptoms. Headlights (median pain = 3, P < 0.001), loupes (median pain = 3.5, P < 0.001), and operative microscope use (median pain = 2, P = 0.02) were all associated with higher pain while operating. A total of 52.5% respondents sought medical treatments, 50.5% were concerned musculoskeletal discomfort would affect their careers, 56.6% reported a colleague that required an operation, and 30.2% reported a colleague on temporary or permanent disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Craniofacial surgery often involves long procedures, use of surgical adjuncts, and ergonomically straining postures, which can lead to musculoskeletal discomfort and injury. This under-reported and important phenomenon merits candid conversation and active preventative strategies to prolong surgical careers, improve professional satisfaction, and maximize patient safety.

A systematic review of biomechanical risk factors for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in surgeons of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown high rates (47-72%) of self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) in surgeons of the head and neck. Physical requirements in the workplace, individual factors (e.g. poor posture, obesity) and psychosocial factors have been identified as risk factors. Establishing biomechanical risk factors may help prevent further development of WRMDs in this population.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this critical review was to source studies that identified the biomechanical risk factors for WRMDs in this surgical sub-specialty.

METHODS

Searches were conducted of Medline, CINAHL, and AMED databases from 1980 until September 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 182 article were identified. Exclusion criteria lead to 163 full-text articles being screened, generating a total of 6 articles for review. The aims of the included studies varied significantly. Surgeons spend the majority of operating time in static, asymmetrical positions. Surgical loupes/headlamps significantly increased cervical spine loading. Articulated surgical arm supports provided optimal ergonomic conditions. Performing surgical operations with the surgeon in standing or sitting had no effect on task performance or demand. Physical fatigue was also measured in both positions.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of equipment-based and patient/surgeon position-based factors predispose surgeons to biomechanical risk factors. Studies of greater methodological quality are required.

Stretching and Strength Training to Improve Postural Ergonomics and Endurance in the Operating Room

Plastic surgeons report the highest prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain and fatigue among surgical subspecialties. Musculoskeletal pain impacts daily life, career longevity, and economic burden secondary to occupational injury. Poor postural awareness and ergonomic set up in the operating room represent the most common etiology.

Methods

A literature review was performed to highlight the ergonomic set-up, postural pitfalls, occupational injuries, and musculoskeletal pain in the operating room. An institutional survey was administered among resident and attending surgeons regarding musculoskeletal pain, posture, ergonomic education, and future improvements. Literature results, survey data, and intraoperative photographs were analyzed in collaboration with physical therapists and personal trainers.

Results

Survey results demonstrated that 97% of resident and attending respondents experienced musculoskeletal pain and 83% reported a lack of education in posture and ergonomics. The main postural pitfalls included head forward and flexed positioning, abduction and internal arm rotation, and kyphosis of the thoracic spine. The collaborators developed instructional videos to assess posture and biomechanics and demonstrate targeted stretching and strength exercises to address specific neck, back, and shoulder pain.

Conclusions

Poor posture is unavoidable in the operating room at times. These educational videos should be utilized for self-motivated and prophylactic conditioning outside of the operating room to maintain physical well-being throughout a career in plastic surgery. Future focus should be aimed at implementing dedicated ergonomic education and physical wellness programs early in surgical resident training.

Interventions to improve ergonomics in the operating theatre: A systematic review of ergonomics training and intra-operative microbreaks

Musculoskeletal occupational injury is prevalent within the surgical community. This is a multi-factorial issue, but is contributed to by physical posture, environmental hazards and administrative deficiency. There is growing awareness of this issue, with several behavioural, educational and administrative techniques being employed. The literature on this topic is, however, sporadic and difficult to access by healthcare practitioners. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature on the current interventions used to minimise musculoskeletal occupational injury in surgeons and interventionalists. This review will focus on administrative and human factor interventions, such as intra-operative microbreaks and ergonomics training.

The Ipswich Microbreak Technique to alleviate neck and shoulder discomfort during microscopic procedures

Neck and shoulder disorders are a considerable health problem amongst frequent microscope users. We aimed to investigate the neck and shoulder discomfort experienced during prolonged microscopic activity and to assess the benefits of minibreaks. A prospective crossover study was performed on 17 healthy volunteers sitting still while looking down a bench with and without the Ipswich Microbreak Technique (IMT). We used a subjective measure of time to fatigue and pain in the neck and shoulder regions as well as objective readings from a surface electromyogram (sEMG). The IMT delayed the sensation of pain in the neck and shoulder region while reducing the overall sEMG muscle activation. In conclusion, IMT is a useful strategy in reducing and delaying the pain in neck and shoulder from prolonged working under the microscope. This technique can be incorporated in other activities that involve a sustained stationary position.

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Injury in Craniofacial and Maxillofacial Surgeons

INTRODUCTION

Long, complex surgical procedures with non-ergonomic postures, headlights, loupe magnification, and microscope use may put craniofacial and maxillofacial surgeons at an increased risk of work-related musculoskeletal discomfort (WRMD). Identifying the prevalence and impact of WRMD may guide preventive strategies to prolong well-being, job satisfaction, and career duration.

METHODS

A 31-question survey was designed to evaluate WRMD. The survey was sent to American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons and American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons members. The survey was created and distributed electronically through a private survey research center (Qualtrics Survey Software).

RESULTS

There were 95 respondents (23.75% response rate): 75% male, 56% aged 31 to 50 years old, and 73% in academic practice. On a scale of 0 to 10 (0 no pain, 10 worst pain), WRMD for surgery without loupes/microscope had a median of 3, with loupes 4, and with microscope 5. Pain was most common in the neck. Pain within 4 hours of surgery was present in 55% and 38% feared pain would influence future surgical performance. Surgeon discomfort affects posture (72%), stamina (32%), sleep (28%), surgical speed (24%), relationships (18%), and concentration (17%). Medical treatment for discomfort was sought by 22%. Time off work for treatment occurred in 9%.

CONCLUSION

The WRMD can affect many aspects of a craniofacial or maxillofacial surgeon's life and has the potential to shorten or end a career. Occupational health and surgical ergonomics should be emphasized during surgical training and in surgical practice.

Personal Safety of the Plastic Surgeon: Keeping Yourself Healthy While You Work

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this study, the participant should be able to: 1. Recognize the primary physical and mental risks faced by the practicing plastic surgeon. 2. State the primary risk factors for cervical spine disease and back pain. 3. State the critical steps for protection from ionizing and nonionizing radiation. 4. List the characteristics of a surgeon exhibiting signs of burnout. 5. Develop a plan for mitigating personal risk of musculoskeletal, exposure, and other injuries.

SUMMARY

Health care workers are exposed to significant occupational hazards, and have a risk of injury similar to that of construction, mining, and manufacturing employees. Plastic surgeons must have a clear understanding of the types of risks they face and the techniques for mitigating them. Exposure to some risks is attributable to unavoidable occupational conditions, but others can be avoided completely. The sources of injury risk from musculoskeletal, exposure, and other causes are discussed in this article, and evidence-based recommendations to ameliorate these risks are presented.

Operating hurts: a study of EAES surgeons

BACKGROUND

Work-related pain and discomfort experienced by surgeons is widely reported in the literature. A survey was, therefore, conducted to explore this issue among members of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

METHODS

The survey was emailed to 2980 EAES members in 2017 enquiring about their working practice, musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and burnout.

RESULTS

A total of 569 (19%) surgeons responded, of whom 556 were practicing surgeons; 86% were consultants, 84% were male, and 94% were right-handed. Respondents operated on average 3.3 days/week with 27% of their procedures lasting longer than 3 h. The 386 endoscopists surveyed reported performing an average of 5.3 procedures/day with 83% performing endoscopy at least once per week. Over half of practicing surgeons (62%) reported their worst pain score was 3 or higher (10-point scale) in the past 7 working days, encompassing 71% of their open, 72% laparoscopic, 48% robot-assisted cases and 52% of their endoscopies. Of the 120 surgeons who had ever sought medical help for aches, pain or discomfort, 38% were currently in pain and 16% had considered leaving surgery due to their MSK pain, 26% had reported work-related pain to their employer, 26% had been on short-term disability during their career and 4% long-term disability due to MSK disorders. A significant proportion of the respondents (49%) felt their physical discomfort would influence the ability to perform or assist with surgical procedures in the future. These surgeons reported significantly lower satisfaction from their work (p = 0.024), higher burnout (p = 0.005) and significantly higher callousness toward people (p < 0.001) than those not fearing loss of career longevity.

CONCLUSION

The results show that MSK pain is prevalent amongst EAES members. Nearly half the respondents had career longevity fears from pain/discomfort which, in turn, correlated with more prevalent feelings of burnout. More emphasis should be placed on the aetiology, prevention and management of musculoskeletal pain in the surgical workforce.

Survey of occupational musculoskeletal pain and injury in Canadian ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

Surgeons and other physicians have reported occupational musculoskeletal (MSK) pain, and it has been recently raised as a growing issue by ophthalmologists and optometrists. What is most concerning is that it could be a serious threat to career longevity and performance. MSK pain and injury in Canadian ophthalmologists has not been quantified. Our goal was to estimate the prevalence of MSK issues, to determine the impact of MSK injuries to working hours and health, and to ascertain physician characteristics and practice patterns associated with MSK problems.

DESIGN

Survey.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-nine ophthalmologists and 121 optometrists.

METHODS

A voluntary internet-based (Survey Monkey) survey was conducted. All Canadian ophthalmologists and ophthalmology residents were contacted via the Canadian Ophthalmological Society, and all optometrists registered through the Canadian Association of Optometrists were contacted through their respective listserve email.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine ophthalmologists (response rate 17%) and 121 optometrists (2.4%) responded to a voluntary internet-based survey. Fifty percent of the ophthalmology respondents reported clinic-associated MSK pain in the preceding 12 months, compared to 61% of optometry respondents (p = 0.06). Of the ophthalmologists, 48.3% said they had experienced occupational MSK pain in the preceding 12 months, which they directly attributed to their operating room activities. Neck pain was reported in 46%, lower back in 36% and shoulder pain in 28% of ophthalmology respondents. This was compared to 34% (p = 0.04), 37% (p = 0.90) and 41% of optometrists (p= 0.02). Respondents in our survey listed "performing the same task over and over", "working in cramped or awkward positions" and "bending or twisting your neck" as the most common causes of MSK pain.

CONCLUSION

Our survey identified that a large proportion of respondents reported MSK pain associated with clinical and surgical duties. Physician-led research is needed before industry and administrative partners can develop equipment and work-spaces that are better suited to the needs of physicians.

Ergonomics in microsurgery

There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that surgeon posture while operating contributes to cervical musculoskeletal strain, discomfort, and chronic pain. Microsurgeons may be particularly susceptible to this risk due to persistent neck flexion, long periods of static posture, and the use of heavy, high-power loupe magnification. Several techniques are thus presented that may help in obviating the cervicospinal repercussions of performing microsurgery.

Surgical loupe usage among oculoplastic surgeons in North America

OBJECTIVE

To study the patterns of usage and perception among U.S. oculoplastic surgeons regarding surgical loupes.

METHODS

An anonymous 20-question survey was emailed out to the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery listserv. Data were compiled in Google Forms. SPSS was used for statistical analyses. This study was approved by the institutional review board.

RESULTS

Of the 609 members contacted, 239 (39%) completed the survey; 95% of respondents owned loupes and 78% regularly used them. No association was observed between frequency of loupe usage and sex or years in practice. The most common magnification and brand were 2.5× and Designs for Vision, respectively. The most common problems associated with loupes were limited vision (33%) and lack of comfort (24%), with 11% citing neck and cervical spinal disorders. The most common benefits were magnification (93%) and increased visual accuracy (68%). Of the respondents, 56% believed improved patient care to be a benefit and 76% believed that loupes enhance surgical outcome. With regard to training, 67% supported incorporating loupes into residency, 35% believed in mandating loupe purchase, and 25% wanted residencies to provide loupes at no cost. Respondent support for the use of loupes in practice and training was directly correlated with how frequently they used loupes.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of respondents owned loupes. Although most loupe owners used loupes regularly, a sizable proportion operated with limited vision and lack of comfort. Overall, just over half of respondents believed that loupes improve patient care and should be integrated into residency.

Sustaining a career in surgery

Surgery is a demanding career with great rewards and equally great challenges. In order to sustain our careers as well as the careers of our colleagues, it is important to understand and address the physical, psychological and spiritual challenges of surgery. With rare exception, the majority of surgery residents and practicing surgeons who prematurely leave surgery do so because they find the work to be physically, emotionally or spiritually incompatible with the vision they have for their life. Understanding these issues and providing solutions to improve surgeon wellness can help prevent societal loss of these highly trained professionals and suffering for surgeons and their families.

The impact of intraoperative microbreaks with exercises on surgeons: A multi-center cohort study

Recent literature has demonstrated ergonomic risk to surgeons in the operating room. One method used in other industries to mitigate these ergonomic risks is the incorporation of microbreaks. Thus, intraoperative microbreaks with exercises in a non-crossover design were studied. Fifty-six attending surgeons from 4 Medical Centers volunteered first in a day of their regular surgeries and then second day where there were microbreaks with exercises that could be performed in the sterile field, answering questions after each case, without significantly increasing the duration of their surgeries. Surgeons self-reported improvement or no change in their mental focus (88%) and physical performance (100%) for the surgical day incorporating microbreaks with exercises. Discomfort in the shoulders was significantly reduced while distractions and flow impact was minimal. Eighty-seven percent of the surgeons wanted to incorporate the microbreaks with exercises into their OR routine. Intraoperative microbreaks with exercises may be a way to mitigate work-related musculoskeletal fatigue, pain and injury.