Antimicrobial Efficacy of Materials Used for Sealing the Implant Abutment Screw Hole: An In Vitro Evaluation

Bacterial Flora in Screw-Fixed Superstructures with Different Sealing Materials: A Comparative Clinical Trial

A screw-fixed superstructure is predominantly selected for implant prostheses because of the concern regarding developing peri-implantitis, although its infection route remains unclear. Focusing on microleakage from access holes, the present study clinically investigated the bacterial flora in access holes with different sealing materials. We examined 38 sites in 19 patients with two adjacent screw-fixed superstructures. Composite resin was used in the control group, and zinc-containing glass ionomer cement was used in the test group. Bacteria were collected from the access holes 28 days after superstructure placement and were subjected to DNA hybridization analysis. The same patient comparisons of the bacterial counts showed a significant decrease in 14 bacterial species for the red, yellow, and purple complexes in the test group (p < 0.05). In addition, the same patient comparisons of the bacterial ratios showed a significant decrease in six bacterial species for the orange, green, yellow, and purple complexes in the test group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the same patient comparisons of the implant positivity rates showed a significant decrease in the six bacterial species for the orange, yellow, and purple complexes in the test group. The results of this study indicate that zinc-containing glass ionomer cement is effective as a sealing material for access holes.

The oral microbiome of implant-abutment screw holes compared with the peri-implant sulcus and natural supragingival plaque in healthy individuals

PURPOSE

An implant-supported prosthesis consists of an implant fixture, an abutment, an internal screw that connects the abutment to the implant fixture, and the upper prosthesis. Numerous studies have investigated the microorganisms present on the implant surface, surrounding tissues, and the subgingival microflora associated with peri-implantitis. However, there is limited information regarding the microbiome within the internal screw space. In this study, microbial samples were collected from the supragingival surfaces of natural teeth, the peri-implant sulcus, and the implant-abutment screw hole, in order to characterize the microbiome of the internal screw space in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Samples were obtained from the supragingival region of natural teeth, the peri-implant sulcus, and the implant screw hole in 20 healthy subjects. DNA was extracted, and the V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced for microbiome analysis. Alpha diversity, beta diversity, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), and network analysis were employed to compare the characteristics of the microbiomes.

RESULTS

We observed significant differences in beta diversity among the samples. Upon analyzing the significant taxa using LEfSe, the microbial composition of the implant-abutment screw hole's microbiome was found to be similar to that of the other sampling sites' microbiomes. Moreover, the microbiome network analysis revealed a unique network complexity in samples obtained from the implant screw hole compared to those from the other sampling sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The bacterial composition of the biofilm collected from the implant-abutment screw hole exhibited significant differences compared to the supra-structure of the implant. Therefore, long-term monitoring and management of not only the peri-implant tissue but also the implant screw are necessary.

Efficacy of Various Implant Abutment Screw Access Channel Sealing Materials in Preventing Microleakage: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of different materials used for sealing dental implant abutment screw access channel (ASAC), in preventing microleakage. As per the searched indexed English literature, this study is the first review of its kind. Indexed English literature published up to February 20, 2021 was systematically searched on relevant electronic databases. The recommendations specified by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were applied for constructing framework, and reporting the current review. The focused PICO (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) question was: "Which material (C) is more effective in sealing (I) implant ASAC (P) in terms of causing minimal microbial leakage (O)". Quality of articles was assessed with modified CONSORT scale for in vitro studies. Five in vitro studies were selected for qualitative analysis after final stage screening. Modified CONSORT scale suggested that out of the 5 selected studies, 1 each was of low and high quality, whereas 3 studies were of moderate quality. Included studies had contrasting results related to the efficacy these materials as sealants in ASAC. Sealing capacity against microleakage should be considered as one of the important criteria while selecting the material to fill implant ASAC. Definitive conclusions asserting superiority of a single material over others are difficult to draw, due to nonhomogeneity in study design of the included papers. More studies should be conducted in the near future to investigate the efficacy of various combination of materials in preventing microleakage.

Evaluation of sealing efficacy and removal convenience of sealing materials for implant abutment screw access holes

Background

Sealing materials are used to fill abutment screw access holes (SAH) to prevent microleakage and protect the central screws in oral implant restoration. However, thus far, no consensus has been reached on sealing material selection. In this study, a comparison of the sealing efficacy and removal convenience of different sealing materials for cement-retained implant restoration was conducted.

Methods

Various sealing materials were classified into five groups, namely, gutta-percha (GP), temporary restorative paste (TRP), vinyl polysiloxane (VPS), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape, and onlay resin (OR), and 35 sets of analog-abutments were allocated into five groups of seven specimens. A sealing efficacy test was conducted using a modified dye-penetration method, in which a lower absorbance indicated better sealing efficacy. For the removal-convenience test, the materials were removed from each SAH after solidification, and the retrieval time was recorded.

Results

On days 1 and 10, PTFE exhibited the highest absorbance value with significant differences compared to the other groups. On day 30, TRP and PTFE showed significantly higher absorbance values than GP, VPS, and OR, but no significant difference was detected between TRP and PTFE (p = 0.424). The absorbance values of TRP and PTFE from days 1, 10, and 30 showed significant intragroup differences, while those of the other groups did not. In terms of the removal convenience on days 1, 10, and 30, VPS achieved the best performance, followed by PTFE, OR, TRP, and GP.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this experiment, VPS and OR showed better sealing efficacy against microleakage and a more convenient removal than the other materials; thus, VPS and OR are recommended for clinical use.

Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole

Background and Objectives: Oral implant restorations are an excellent treatment option for edentulous patients; however, periodontopathogenic bacteria have been found in the microgaps between implant−abutment junctions. Implant designs to limit the microgaps have been extensively studied. However, studies have shown microgaps continue to exist, allowing for the leakage of bacteria into the implant system. Screw access hole materials are used to fill the access hole void. The use of materials with beneficial properties could provide bacterial leakage prevention. The aim of this study was to examine the surface free energy, cytotoxicity, and bacterial adhesion of selected screw access hole materials such as cotton, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape, paraffin wax−polyolefin thermoplastic (PF), paraffin wax (Wax), gutta-percha (GP), and caviton EX (CE). Materials and Methods: A sessile drop test was performed to observe the contact angle and calculate the surface free energy of each material in order to determine the level of hydrophobicity. Cytotoxicity was examined in a mouse gingival epithelial cell line for day 1 and day 3. Bacterial adhesion was tested with Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Results: PTFE, PF, and wax presented low surface free energies of 19.34, 23.041, and 24.883 mN.m-1, respectively. No cytotoxicity was observed, except for GP and CE. Concurrently, the bacterial adhesion was also the lowest in PTFE and PF. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, PTFE and PF showed an excellent biocompatibility with few bacterial adhesions. These materials could be potential screw access hole materials in clinical settings.

The influence of a composite resin adhesive on microleakage into the implant screw access chamber

BACKGROUND

The sealing of implant screw access chambers can influence prosthesis success, peri-implant health and patient comfort. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of single implant crown screw access chambers sealed with and without a composite resin adhesive.

METHODS

Twenty milled lithium disilicate crowns were luted to titanium-base abutments, attached to implants and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group had the screw access chamber sealed with polytetrafluoroethylene tape, a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate containing adhesive, and composite resin. The second group used the same procedure but without an adhesive. All samples were sealed at the implant-abutment interface and subjected to thermocycling then immersed in a ferrous sulphate contrast media for 48 h. Infiltration and microleakage was measured using a microcomputed tomography scanner.

RESULTS

All samples demonstrated high resistance to microleakage with no significant contrast media diffusion in either of the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the use of a composite resin adhesive for sealing the screw access chamber for single implant crowns provided no additional sealing capacity compared with composite resin alone. Composite resin restorations placed in the traditional manner without sealing provided excellent resistance to microleakage.

An auxiliary device for screw-retained fixed implant restorations which prevents extrusion of cement into screw-access openings

For screw-retained fixed implant prostheses, the cement that extrudes onto the margin can be easily removed, but the cement that may intrude into the screw-access opening (SAO) during the extraoral bonding process is difficult to eliminate. This article presents a manufactured auxiliary device that is applied to the extraoral bonding process of screw-retained fixed implant prostheses. This device will prevent excess cement from being left in the SAO.

Materials Sealing Preventing Biofilm Formation in Implant/Abutment Joints: Which Is the Most Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature available for materials exhibiting the best efficacy in preventing biofilm formation in the interior of implants. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. This review is registered with the PROSPERO database and followed the suitability of the PRISMA protocol. The initial search resulted in 326 articles from the databases. After they were read, 8 articles remained, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Six of these 8 articles were classified as in vitro and 2 were classified as in situ. The regions of the implants evaluated ranged from the interface of the pieces to the occlusal upper access of the abutment. The implant connections evaluated the Morse taper, external connection, and internal connection. Meta-analysis of the quantitative data was performed at a significance level of .05. Cotton exhibited poor control of infiltration, even in combination with other materials. Isolated gutta-percha (GP) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape with composite resin (CR) or GP performed better as physical barriers. The best results for chemical barriers were observed by the application of 1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) gel, thymol varnish, and the deposition of Ag films onto the surface. The applied meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in comparison between the different types of implant connections (P > .05). The application of CG and thymol varnish antimicrobials was effective in preventing biofilm formation and easy clinical execution; these could be used in combination with CR, GP, and PTFE.