Prognostic Value of Pathologic Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients With Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Neo-adjuvant pembrolizumab in stage IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer: the phase II Neo-Pembro trial

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, their efficacy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains limited. Some patients, however, achieve lasting responses, emphasizing the need to understand how tumor microenvironment and molecular characteristics influence ICI response. The phase 2 Neo-Pembro study (NCT03126812) included 33 untreated stage IV HGSOC patients, who were scheduled for 6 cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel and interval cytoreductive surgery. Pembrolizumab (pembro) was added from cycle two and continued for one year. The primary objective was to assess intratumoral immune activation using multiplexed immunofluorescence and immune-related gene expression. Our findings show immune activation, evidenced by an increase in CD3 + , CD8 + , CD8 + /FOXP3+ ratio, TNF-α and interferon-γ signaling. Treatment was well-tolerated. We observed major pathologic responses in 9/33 patients (27%, 95%CI 14-46), with pathologic response strongly associated with immune activation and OS. At a median follow-up of 52.8 months, 8/9 major responders were alive, with 6 patients recurrence-free. In contrast, 4/24 minor responders survived, including one recurrence-free. ctDNA clearance was observed in all major responders and was associated with prolonged PFS and OS. PD-L1 expression and homologous recombination deficiency were predictive of major response and may serve as biomarkers, warranting further exploration. These results suggest major responders may benefit from neo-adjuvant pembro.

Size distribution of extracellular vesicles in pretreatment ascites and plasma is correlated with primary treatment outcome in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma

To improve the treatment outcome and survival of patients with advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), prognostic biomarkers for assessing the feasibility of complete (R0) or optimal (R1) primary cytoreductive surgery are needed. Additionally, biomarkers for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with primary inoperable disease could help stratify patients for tailored therapy and improve personalised approach. Such promising biomarkers are extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are present in ascites and plasma and are available for minimally invasive liquid biopsy. EV concentration and EV molecular profile have been at the forefront of research in the field of biomarkers for many years now, but recent studies have highlighted the importance of EV size distribution. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential of the EV concentration and size distribution in pretreatment ascites and plasma samples from patients with advanced HGSC as prognostic biomarkers. In our prospective cohort study, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was used to determine EV characteristics in paired pretreatment ascites and plasma samples from 37 patients with advanced HGSC. Patients were treated with primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) (N = 15) or NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) when optimal cytoreduction was not feasible (N = 22). The correlations of the EV concentration and size distribution in ascites and plasma with treatment outcome, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. We found a significant correlation between the EV size distribution in ascites and residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery. Larger EVs in ascites correlated with worse resection success after primary cytoreductive surgery. A significant correlation between the D10 value of EVs in plasma and the chemotherapy response score (CRS) after NACT was observed. A smaller D10 value of plasma EVs was correlated with a better chemotherapy response. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed excellent performance for D10 value in ascites for the prediction of suboptimal (R2) resection at primary debulking surgery and excellent performance for D10 value in plasma for the prediction of complete or near-complete chemotherapy response score (CRS 3) at interval debulking surgery. There was a significant correlation between the mean diameter, D90 value and proportion of medium/large (> 200 nm) EVs in ascites and those in plasma. On the other hand, there was no correlation of the EV concentration or D10 and D50 values between the ascites fluid and plasma samples. Our results indicate that the EV size distribution in ascites has the potential to predict resection success after primary cytoreductive surgery and that the EV size distribution of the smallest EVs in plasma might help predict the chemotherapy response of patients treated with NACT. In the future, molecular analyses of size-dependent EV cargo could provide more insight into their biological functions and potential as predictive biomarkers.

The association of the chemotherapy response score and homologous recombination deficiency in patients undergoing interval tumor reductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

In patients undergoing interval tumor reductive surgery, a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may limit available tumor for homologous recombination deficiency testing. The objective of this study was to assess whether the chemotherapy response score predicts homologous recombination status.

METHODS

We identified patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (diagnosed January 2019 to 20 June 2023) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent interval surgery, and for whom a chemotherapy response score was reported (1=no or minimal tumor response, 2=appreciable tumor response, 3=complete or near complete response with no residual tumor). Comparisons were made using ANOVAs or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 234 patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent interval surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of those who underwent germline genetic testing, 22% (51/232) had a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and of those with tumors sent for testing, 65% were found to have homologous recombination deficiency (66/146). With increasing chemotherapy response scores, a higher likelihood of a complete gross resection was observed (50% (chemotherapy response score, CRS 1) vs 77% (CRS 2) vs 88% (CRS 3), p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, CRS 2 (adjusted odds ratio=3.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 9.60, p=0.03) and CRS 3 (5.83, 1.79 to 18.93, p=0.003) were independently associated with homologous recombination deficiency compared with CRS 1.

CONCLUSION

A positive response to chemotherapy at the time of interval tumor reductive surgery defined by the chemotherapy response score was associated with homologous recombination status and the likelihood of achieving a complete gross resection.

Germline BRCA1/2 status and chemotherapy response score in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) can be treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and delayed primary surgery (DPS). Histopathological response to NACT can be assessed using Böhm's chemotherapy response score (CRS). We investigated whether germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) genotype associated with omental CRS phenotype.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage IIIC/IV HGSOC prescribed NACT and tested for gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) between September 2017 and December 2022 at The Christie Hospital. The Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association between survival and key clinical factors. The chi-square test assessed the association between CRS3 (no/minimal residual tumour) and gBRCA1/2 status.

RESULTS

Of 586 eligible patients, 393 underwent DPS and had a CRS reported. Independent prognostic factors by multivariable analysis were gBRCA1/2 status (PV versus wild type [WT]), CRS (3 versus 1 + 2), surgical outcome (complete versus optimal/suboptimal) and first-line poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1/2 inhibitor maintenance therapy (yes versus no) (all P < 0.05). There was a non-significant trend for tumours with a gBRCA2 PV having CRS3 versus WT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.13, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.95-4.91; P = 0.0647). By contrast, tumours with a gBRCA1 PV were significantly less likely to have CRS3 than WT (OR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.14-0.91; P = 0.0291).

CONCLUSIONS

Germline BRCA1/2 genotype was not clearly associated with superior omental CRS. Further research is required to understand how HGSOC biology defines CRS.

Molecular Alterations in Paired Epithelial Ovarian Tumors in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy is a therapeutic choice for women with advanced ovarian cancer. Whether NACT affects the tumor's molecular profile has not been determined.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer treated with NACT at oncology departments affiliated with the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG). Tumor molecular profiling was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor pre- and post-NACT tissues. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor molecular alterations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) via next-generation sequencing analysis were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, tumors from 36 patients were assessed, and molecular profiling was evaluated in 20 paired tumor samples. HRD positivity exhibited no significant change between pre- and post-NACT tumors. The BRCA1/2 mutational status remained constant, irrespective of the treatment administration. Pre-NACT tumors tended to exhibit a lower percentage of intratumoral TILs compared to post-NACT tumors (p = 0.004). Differences in the mutation profile between pre- and post-treatment tissue were observed in 33.33% (6/18) of the cases. The mean tumor cell content (TCC) (p-value: 0.0840) and the mean genomic instability score (p-value: 0.0636) decreased slightly numerically after therapy. A moderate inverse relationship was observed between the pre-NACT TMB and the chemotherapy response score (p-value: 0.038), indicating this correlation is statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into the effect of NACT on the tumor molecular landscape. While BRCA1/2 and HRD status remained stable, an increase in TIL proportion and changes in the mutational profiles were observed post-treatment.

Chemotherapy response score as a predictor of survival in ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The chemotherapy response score (CRS) has been widely adopted as a predictive tool for ovarian cancer survival. In the present study, we seek to define differences in survival rates among patients grouped in the traditionally established three-tiered system and those who have not been offered debulking surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

We designed a retrospective cohort study involving women treated with chemotherapy and offered interval or late debulking surgery for ovarian cancer. Twenty-eight women were not considered for a debulking procedure for various reasons. Of the 89 women who were finally offered interval debulking or late debulking surgery, 28 had a CRS 1 score, 34 had a CRS 2 score and 27 had a CRS 3 score.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted in the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients based on the CRS stratification, although survival rates were considerably longer for all three groups compared to those of patients who were not offered surgery. Cox regression univariate analysis revealed that suboptimal debulking and CRS 1 or no surgery had a significant negative impact on PFS and OS rates. The binary stratification of CRS (CRS 1-2 vs CRS 3) revealed comparable differences in the PFS and OS to those in the groups that were stratified as platinum resistant and platinum sensitive.

CONCLUSION

The chemotherapy response score is a significant determinant of ovarian cancer survival that helps evaluate the risk of early disease relapse and death and may soon be useful in guiding patient-tailored treatment.

Current Status and Controversies in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Review

Objective: To evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in the management of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), with a focus on patient eligibility, pre-NACT diagnosis, treatment, timing of interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) and the target of ICS, challenges in ICS, response assessment, changes in the tumor microenvironment during NACT, platinum resistance. Mechanism: NACT precedes cytoreductive surgery and shrinks tumors, thereby improving surgical success. Findings in Brief: NACT shows promising results for improving tumor reduction rates and improve prognosis. Conclusions: NACT has emerged as a promising treatment strategy for AOC.

Prognostic Value of Mandard's Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) in Post Chemo-Radiotherapy Cervical Cancer

In locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), definitive chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment, but chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery could be an alternative choice in selected patients. We enrolled 244 patients affected by LACC and treated with CT-RT followed by surgery in order to assess the prognostic role of the histological response using the Mandard scoring system. Results: A complete pathological response (TRG 0) was observed in 118 patients (48.4%), rare residual cancer cells (TRG2) were found in 49 cases (20.1%), increased number of cancer cells but fibrosis still predominating (TRG3) in 35 cases (14.3%), and 42 (17.2%) were classified as non-responders (TRG4-5). TRG was significantly associated with both OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001). The survival curves highlighted two main prognostic groups: TRG1-TRG2 and TRG3-TRG4-5. Main responders (TRG1-2) showed a 92% 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) and a 75% 5-year disease free survival (5y-DFS). Minor or no responders showed a 48% 5y-OS and a 39% 5y-DFS. The two-tiered TRG was independently associated with both DFS and OS in Cox regression analysis. Conclusion. We showed that Mandard TRG is an independent prognostic factor in post-CT/RT LACC, with potential benefits in defining post-treatment adjuvant therapy.

Chemotherapy Response Score in Ovarian Cancer Patients: An Overview of Its Clinical Utility

The chemotherapy response score has been developed over the last few years as a predictive index of survival outcomes for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval debulking surgery. While its importance in predicting patients at risk of developing recurrences earlier seems to be important, its accuracy in determining patients with a shorter overall survival remains arbitrary. Moreover, standardization of the actual scoring system that was initially developed as a 6-tiered score and adopted as a 3-tiered score is still needed, as several studies suggest that a 2-tiered system is preferable. Given its actual importance in detecting patients with shorter progression-free survival, research should also focus on the actual predictive value of determining patients with platinum resistance, as a suboptimal patient response to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy might help determine patients at risk of an earlier recurrence. In the present review, we summarize current knowledge retrieved from studies addressing outcomes related to the chemotherapy response score in epithelial ovarian cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and discuss differences in outcome reporting to help provide directions for further research.

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).

Survival impact of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to number of cycles in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy response score according to the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on disease-free survival and overall survival, in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer ineligible for primary debulking surgery.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent 3-4 or 6 cycles of a platinum and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by complete cytoreduction surgery (CC-0) or cytoreduction to minimal residual disease (CC-1), between January 2008 and December 2015, in four institutions. Disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed according to the histological response to chemotherapy defined by the validated chemotherapy response score.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients were included: 219 (60.0%) received 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 146 (40.0%) had 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery. There were no significant differences in early relapses, disease-free survival, and overall survival according to the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. However, regardless of the number cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, persistent extensive histological disease (chemotherapy response score 1-2) was significantly associated with a higher peritoneal cancer index, minimal residual disease (CC-1), and early relapses. Median disease-free survival in patients with complete or near-complete response (score 3) was 28.3 months (95% CI 21.6 to 36.8), whereas it was 16.3 months in patients with chemotherapy response score 1-2 (95% CI 14.7 to 18.0, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles was not associated with disease-free survival or overall survival. Chemotherapy response score 3 improved oncological outcome regardless of the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles.

Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: chemotherapy response score (CRS) is widely used to assess the response of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) to chemotherapy and is based on pathological examination of omental specimens. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of CRS assessed on the uterine adnexa. Methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching three electronic databases from 2015 inception to September 2021. We included all studies reporting either hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) or primary PFS data, for both adnexal and omental CRS in HGSC. HRs with 95% CI were extracted and pooled by using a significant p-value < 0.05. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by using Higgins’ I2. Results: six studies with 691 HGSC patients were included. Adnexal CRS3 vs. CRS1-2 significantly stratified PFS, with a HR of 0.572 (0.447−0.733; p < 0.001). Omental CRS3 vs. CRS1-2 significantly stratified PFS with a similar HR (HR = 0.542; 95% CI 0.444−0.662; p < 0.001). Statistical heterogeneity was 0% in both analyses. Conclusions: adnexal CRS significantly stratifies PFS in HGSC and might be used when omental CRS is not assessable.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) is the recommended approach in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, most patients eventually relapse despite the initial high response rate to chemotherapy. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a well-known biomarker that reflects severe inflammation, critical illness, and mortality in various diseases. Chemotherapy response score (CRS) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been identified as potential biomarkers of platinum resistance and disease prognosis. We retrospectively evaluated 132 patients with stage IIIc or IV ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer who had received NACT followed by IDS from 01/01/2003 to 31/12/2018. CRS was assessed on omental specimens collected from IDS according to ICCR guidelines.

RESULTS

Median age was 64.57 years (SD: 9.72; range 39.2-87.1). Most ovarian tumors were serous epithelial (90.9%; 120/132). An elevated NLR (defined as > 3) was observed in 72% (95/132) of patients in contrast with 28% (37/132) of patients characterized by low NLR status. Median PFS (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 13.05 months (95% CI: 11.42-14.67)) and 34.69 months (95% CI: 23.26-46.12) respectively. In univariate analysis, CRS3 score was significantly associated with prolonged mPFS (CRS1/2: 12.79 months vs CRS3: 17.7 months; P = 0.008). CRS score was not associated with mOS (P = 0.876). High NLR was not significantly associated with mPFS (P = 0.128), however it was significantly associated with poor mOS (P = 0.012). In multivariate analysis, only performance of surgery maintained its statistical significance with both PFS (P = 0.001) and OS (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

NLR could serve as a useful predictor of OS but not PFS in ovarian cancer patients receiving NACT. In accordance with our previous study, CRS score at omentum was found to be associated with PFS but not OS in ovarian cancer patients treated with NACT and IDS.

Greater-omentum lesion-score (GOLS) as a predictor of residual disease in different regions of the peritoneal cavity in patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer and its potential clinical utility

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The greater omentum(GO) is a common site of residual disease in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The presence of tumor in the GO could predict presence of disease in other peritoneal regions. The goal of this study was to perform a correlation between the greater-omentum lesion-score(GOLS) and presence of disease in different peritoneal regions and determine its potential utility in guiding interval cytoreductive surgery(CRS).

METHODS

This prospective study included 134 patients undergoing interval CRS from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020. Each region of Sugarbaker's Peritobneal Cancer Index(PCI) was given a lesion score(LS) from 0 to 3 according to the diameter of the largest tumor in the region. The GOLS was recorded separately from other structures in the region. Correlation between the GOLS and surgical and pathological LS in each region was performed.

RESULTS

As the GOLS increased, the incidence of disease(surgical LS) in other regions of the peritoneal cavity increased. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves showed area under curve more than 80% for regions 1-2 and 7-8 indicating a high probability of disease in these regions in patients with GOLS 1-3. The positive predictive value(PPV) of preoperative imaging for GOLS was 95.7%. No cut-off of the GOLS could predict presence of disease on pathology with more than 70% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of disease in the GO warrants performing upper abdominal exploration and/or cytoreduction and interval CRS should be planned accordingly in these patients. Imaging has a high PPV in detecting disease in the GO.

Impact of Ki-67 Labeling Index on Prognostic Significance of the Chemotherapy Response Score in Women With Tubo-ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

The chemotherapy response score (CRS) proposed by Bohm and colleagues in 2015 has been validated as a reproducible method for determining histopathologic response of tubo-ovarian carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and stratifies tumor response into 3 groups: CRS1 is defined as minimal/no response, CRS2 as moderate response, and CRS3 as marked response. Although described as a 3-tiered system, it essentially works as a 2-tiered system (CRS1/CRS2 vs. CRS3) for assessing prognosis. Here, we analyzed the prognostic value of CRS in a large cohort of tubo-ovarian carcinomas at a tertiary care center and evaluated the potential for Ki-67 labeling index on post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy samples to provide additional prognostic information. We included 170 patients with tubo-ovarian carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. We determined CRS for each case by reviewing slides from the interval debulking surgery resection specimen and calculated progression-free survival and overall survival. For each case with residual disease (CRS1 and CRS2, n=123, 72%), we also performed Ki-67 antibody staining and determined both average and highest Ki-67 labeling index. Consistent with prior studies, patients in our cohort with CRS1 and CRS2 showed significantly shorter progression-free survival and overall survival compared with CRS3. Further, in the subset of cases with CRS1 and CRS2, Ki-67 labeling index was predictive of OS at multiple cutoff points. An average Ki-67 labeling index of 20% (log rank test P-value: 0.0004) or a highest Ki-67 labeling index of 50% (log rank test P-value: 0.0002) could provide a practically useful cutoff. Multivariable cox proportional hazard model showed worse overall survival with both, average Ki-67 >20% (hazard ratios: 2.02, P-value: 0.00422, confidence interval: 1.25-3.28) and highest Ki-67 >50% (hazard ratios: 1.88, P-value: 0.0205, confidence interval: 1.1-3.2). We propose adding Ki-67 labeling index to CRS to provide additional prognostic separation between patients with CRS1 and CRS2.

A Modified 2 Tier Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) and Other Histopathologic Features for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Extrauterine High-Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: The impact of chemotherapy response score (CRS) on prognosis has varied among studies. We addressed the prognostic significance of CRS and the prognostic value of previously undescribed histologic features using a cohort of 245 patients. Methods: Retrospective study in patients with advanced extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery from 1990 to 2018 in our hospital. Gynecologic pathologists assessed tumor CRS and other histologic features. Clinical information was collected, and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: A modified 2 tier CRS (CRS 1/2 versus CRS 3) was significantly associated, independent of scoring site (omental versus adnexal), with overall survival (OS) (omentum, p = 0.018; adnexa, p = 0.042; entire cohort, p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.021, p = 0.035, and p = 0.001, respectively). On multivariate survival analysis, 2 tier CRS, oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for OS (p = 0.034, p = 0.020, p = 0.007, and p = 0.010, respectively). Likewise, 2 tier CRS, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for PFS (p = 0.012, p = 0.003, p = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions: The modified 2 tier CRS was significantly associated with survival, independent of scoring site. Additional histologic features including oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia can also predict patient outcomes.

HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking is associated with development of platinum-refractory or -resistant disease

OBJECTIVE

To describe our single-institution oncologic outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

We compared clinicopathologic information and outcomes for all patients with advanced stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who received NACT and IDS with (N = 20) or without (N = 48) HIPEC at our institution from 2010 to 2019 RESULTS: Mean age (62 years with HIPEC and 60 years without HIPEC) and proportion of stage 4 disease (40% for both) did not differ between cohorts. HIPEC patients had higher rates of complete cytoreduction (95% vs 50%), longer mean duration of surgery (530 vs. 216 min), more grade 3 or 4 postoperative complications (65% vs. 4%), and longer mean length of hospital stay (8 vs. 5 days). HIPEC patients had significantly higher risk for platinum-refractory progression or platinum-resistance recurrence (50% vs 23%; RR = 2.18; 95% CI 1.11, 4.30, p = 0.024). Median progression free survival (11.5 vs. 12 months) and all-cause mortality (19.1 vs. 30.5 months) in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC cohorts, respectively, did not differ CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC was associated with increased risk for platinum refractory or resistant disease. Higher surgical complexity may contribute to higher complication rates without improving oncologic outcomes in our patients. Further investigations and long-term follow-up are needed to assess the utility of HIPEC in primary treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Distribution of residual disease in the peritoneum following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and its potential therapeutic implications

INTRODUCTION

Residual disease in 'normal appearing' peritoneum is seen in nearly 30% of the patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer. The goal was to study the sequence of response in different regions, the commonest sites of occult residual disease, its incidence in different peritoneal regions and the potential therapeutic implications of these.

METHODS

This was a prospective multi-centre study (July 2018-June 2019). Pathological evaluation of cytoreductive surgery specimens was performed according to a fixed protocol. Prevalence of residual disease in different regions was used to study patterns of response and distribution of residual disease.

RESULT

In 85 patients treated between July 2018 to June 2019, microscopic disease in 'normal appearing' peritoneal regions was seen in 22 (25.2%) and in normal peritoneum around tumor nodules in 30 (35.2%) patients. Regions 4 and 8 of Sugarbaker's PCI had the highest incidence of occult disease and regions 9 and 10 the lowest. The response to chemotherapy occurred in a similar manner in over 95%- the least common site of residual disease was the small bowel mesentery, followed by upper regions (regions 1-3), omentum and middle regions (regions 0, 4, 8), lower regions (regions 5-7) and lastly the ovaries.

CONCLUSIONS

During interval CRS, based on the disease mapping provided in this manuscript, regions that have a high probability of residual disease should be explored and dissected. Complete resection of involved the peritoneal region can completely address the occult disease. The role of resection of the entire region as well as 'normal appearing' parietal peritoneal regions should be prospectively evaluated.

A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?

The chemotherapy response score (CRS) is used to score histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of patients with extrauterine high-grade serous carcinoma. This study was undertaken to determine if the CRS in the omentum, adnexa or when combined correlates with (1) progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), (2) laparoscopic score of abdominal disease, (3) Cancer antigen 125 levels, (4) BRCA status, and (5) platinum-resistant disease. A total of 158 cases were retrospectively collected that received NACT between April 2013 and February 2018 at a single institution. The 3-tier Böhm CRS system was applied to the omentum and adnexa. Survival outcomes between scored subgroups were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Spearman rank correlation analyses were used to assess CRS and clinical data. A total of 119 cases were treated only with carboplatin/paclitaxel. Omental CRS was: 1 (23 cases, 19.3%), 2 (65 cases, 54.6%), and 3 (31 cases, 26.1%), whereas adnexal CRS was: 1 (50 cases, 42%), 2 (48 cases, 40.3%) and 3 (21 cases, 17.6%). The omental CRS was significantly associated with PFS as a 2-tier score (hazard ratio [HR]=0.612, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.378-0.989, P=0.045) but not associated with the PFS using the 3-tier score or with OS using either system. Adnexal CRS was not associated with OS but was significantly associated with PFS using the 3-tier (HR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.263-0.914, P=0.025) and 2-tier scores (HR=0.535, 95% CI: 0.297-0.963, P=0.037). The combined score was not associated with OS but was significantly associated with PFS using the 3-tier (HR=0.348, 95% CI: 0.137-0.88, P=0.026) and 2-tier scores (HR=0.364, 95% CI: 0.148-0.896, P=0.028). No CRS system used associated with laparoscopic assessment of disease. CRS in the omentum had no significant association with platinum resistance; however, the adnexal CRS 1/2 were 3 times as likely to develop platinum resistance compared with CRS 3 (relative risk=3.94, 95% CI: 1.03-15.09, P=0.046). The CRS, when used on the omentum, adnexa, and as a combined score, was significantly associated with PFS but not with OS. Adnexal CRS 1/2 are more likely to develop platinum-resistant disease. Therefore, the use of this pathology parameter may be useful for clinical management.

External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response

OBJECTIVES

The chemotherapy response score (CRS) has been developed for measuring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. This study aimed to validate the ability of this three-tier scoring system of pathologic response on omental specimens to determine prognosis in a subgroups of patients who had clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study, conducted in women receiving interval debulking surgery at the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, between December 2007 and April 2017. Inclusion criteria were: high-grade serous ovarian cancer, FIGO stage IIIC/IV, platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (normalization in CA125 levels, disappearance of all target and non-target lesions according to RECIST 1.1). CRS was defined by a single pathology review and classified as previously reported: CRS1, no or minimal tumor response with fibroinflammatory changes limited to a few foci ranging from multifocal or diffuse regression-associated fibroinflammatory changes with viable tumor in sheets, or nodules to extensive regression-associated fibroinflammatory changes with multifocal residual tumor; CRS2, appreciable tumor response with viable tumor readily identifiable; and CRS3, complete absence of tumor or nodules with maximum size of 2 mm. CRS was analyzed according to clinical variables and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were eligible for analysis. The average age was 65 (range 36-85) years. A total of 91 (84.3%) patients had stage IIIC disease and 17 (15.7%) patients had stage IV disease. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of age, FIGO stage, CA125 serum levels, type of chemotherapy schedules, and number of cycles between the three groups. Patients in the CRS3 group had a longer median progression-free survival (25.8 months) compared with CRS2 or CRS 1 (20.3 vs 17.4 months, respectively; p=0.001). Median overall survival was 68.9 months for CRS3, 35.0 months for CRS2, and 45.9 months for CRS1 (p=0.034).

CONCLUSION

Complete or near-complete pathologic response assessed in the omental specimens of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CRS3) is predictive of prolonged progression-free and overall survival. In particular, this is true in women with a clinical complete response.

Evaluating the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

Objective

To compare the chemoresistance and survival in patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS). The clinical characteristics of patients who benefited from NACT were further evaluated.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 220 patients who underwent NACT followed by IDS or PDS from January 2002 to December 2016. Differences in clinicopathological features, chemoresistance and prognosis were analyzed.

Results

The incidence rate for optimal cytoreduction and chemoresistance in the NACT group was relatively higher than PDS group. No differences were observed in progression free survival or overall survival. Patients without macroscopic RD in NACT group (NACT-R0) had a similar prognosis compared to those in PDS group who had RD<1 cm, and a relatively better prognosis compared to the PDS group that had RD ≥ 1 cm. The survival curve showed that patients in NACT-R0 group that were chemosensitive seemed to have a better prognosis compared to patients in PDS group that had RD.

Conclusion

Patients without RD after PDS had the best prognosis, whereas patients with RD after NACT followed by IDS had the worst. However, even if patients achieved no RD, their prognosis varied depending on chemosensitivity. Survival was better in patients who were chemosensitive compared to thosewho underwent PDS but had RD. Hence evaluating the chemosensitivity and feasibility of complete cytoreduction in advance is crucial.

Measuring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma: an analysis of the correlation between CT imaging and chemotherapy response score

INTRODUCTION

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is measured by CT and the decision to proceed with interval surgery is made on the radiological response after two or three cycles of therapy. The Chemotherapy Response Score grades histological tumor regression in omental metastases resected at interval surgery and is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. It is uncertain whether radiological response is associated with prognosis and whether radiological response predicts Chemotherapy Response Score.To assess if radiological response is associated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Additionally, to investigate whether radiological response predicts the Chemotherapy Response Score.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiological response was assessed by comparing CT imaging at baseline and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) and classified as stable disease, partial response, complete response, or progressive disease. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazard models and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 51 had pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy CT scans available for analysis. Radiological response was not associated with progression-free survival or overall survival on univariate analysis (stable disease vs partial response; HR for progression-free survival 1.15; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.32; p = 0.690; HR for overall survival 1.19; 95% CI 0.57 to 2.46; p = 0.645). In a multivariate model, radiological response was not associated with either progression-free survival (stable disease vs partial response; HR=1.19; 95% CI 0.498 to 2.85; p = 0.694) or overall survival (stable disease vs partial response; HR=0.954; 95% CI 0.38 to 2.40; p = 0.920). There was a significant association between the Chemotherapy Response Score and radiological response (p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

A partial response and stable disease on radiological assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer were not associated with survival, despite having a correlation with the Chemotherapy Response Score.