1
|
Taylor JS, Fellman BM, Raty S, Lasala J, Iniesta MD, Cain KE, Horner AA, Bruno M, Folloder JP, Knippel SL, Khanh V, Popovich S, Katz MHG, Best C, Thosani S. Detection and Management of Perioperative Hyperglycemia at a Tertiary Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3017-3023. [PMID: 38347330 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14986-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To improve the detection and management of perioperative hyperglycemia at our tertiary cancer center, we implemented a glycemic control quality improvement initiative. The primary goal was to decrease the percentage of diabetic patients with median postoperative glucose levels > 180 mg/dL during hospitalization by 15% within 2 years. METHODS A multidisciplinary team standardized preoperative screening, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative hyperglycemia management. We included all patients undergoing nonemergent inpatient and outpatient operations. We used a t test, rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test to assess differences in outcomes between patients at baseline (BL) (10/2018-4/2019), during the first phase (P1) (10/2019-4/2020), second phase (P2) (5/2020-12/2020), and maintenance phase (M) (1/2021-10/2022). RESULTS The analysis included 9891 BL surgical patients (1470 with diabetes), 8815 P1 patients (1233 with diabetes), 10,401 P2 patients (1531 with diabetes) and 30,410 M patients (4265 with diabetes). The percentage of diabetic patients with median glucose levels >180 mg/dL during hospitalization decreased 32% during the initiative (BL, 20.1%; P1, 16.9%; P2, 12.1%; M, 13.7% [P < .001]). We also saw reductions in the percentages of diabetic patients with median glucose levels >180 mg/dL intraoperatively (BL, 34.0%; P1, 26.6%; P2, 23.9%; M, 20.3% [P < .001]) and in the postanesthesia care unit (BL, 36.0%; P1, 30.4%; P2, 28.5%; M, 25.8% [P < .001]). The percentage of patients screened for diabetes by hemoglobin A1C increased during the initiative (BL, 17.5%; P1, 52.5%; P2, 66.8%; M 74.5% [P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS Our successful initiative can be replicated in other hospitals to standardize and improve glycemic control among diabetic surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolyn S Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Sally Raty
- Department of Anesthesiology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Javier Lasala
- Department of Anesthesiology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Maria D Iniesta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Katherine E Cain
- Department of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Allison A Horner
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Morgan Bruno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Justin P Folloder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Susan L Knippel
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Vu Khanh
- Department of Internal Medicine, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Shannon Popovich
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Conor Best
- Department of Endocrinology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Sonali Thosani
- Department of Endocrinology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin YM, Paolucci I, Albuquerque Marques Silva J, O’Connor CS, Fellman BM, Jones KA, Kuban JD, Huang SY, Metwalli ZA, Brock KK, Odisio BC. Intraprocedural Versus Initial Follow-up Minimal Ablative Margin Assessment After Colorectal Liver Metastasis Thermal Ablation: Which One Better Predicts Local Outcomes? Invest Radiol 2024; 59:314-319. [PMID: 37812469 PMCID: PMC10939990 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of 3-dimensional minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantified by intraprocedural versus initial follow-up computed tomography (CT) in predicting local tumor progression (LTP) after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) thermal ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-institution, patient-clustered, tumor-based retrospective study included patients undergoing microwave and radiofrequency ablation between 2016 and 2021. Patients without intraprocedural and initial follow-up contrast-enhanced CT, residual tumors, or with follow-up less than 1 year without LTP were excluded. Minimal ablative margin was quantified by a biomechanical deformable image registration method with segmentations of CLMs on intraprocedural preablation CT and ablation zones on intraprocedural postablation and initial follow-up CT. Prognostic value of MAM to predict LTP was tested using area under the curve and competing-risk regression model. RESULTS A total of 68 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 57 ± 12 years; 43 men) with 133 CLMs were included. During a median follow-up of 30.3 months, LTP rate was 17% (22/133). The median volume of ablation zone was 27 mL and 16 mL segmented on intraprocedural and initial follow-up CT, respectively ( P < 0.001), with corresponding median MAM of 4.7 mm and 0 mm, respectively ( P < 0.001). The area under the curve was higher for MAM quantified on intraprocedural CT (0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94) compared with initial follow-up CT (0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76) in predicting 1-year LTP ( P < 0.001). An MAM of 0 mm on intraprocedural CT was an independent predictor of LTP with a subdistribution hazards ratio of 11.9 (95% CI, 4.9-28.9; P < 0.001), compared with 2.4 (95% CI, 0.9-6.0; P = 0.07) on initial follow-up CT. CONCLUSIONS Ablative margin quantified on intraprocedural CT significantly outperformed initial follow-up CT in predicting LTP and should be used for ablation endpoint assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Mao Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Iwan Paolucci
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Caleb S. O’Connor
- Imaging Physics,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kyle A. Jones
- Imaging Physics,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joshua D. Kuban
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Steven Y. Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zeyad A. Metwalli
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kristy K. Brock
- Imaging Physics,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bruno C. Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Varon ML, Geng Y, Fellman BM, Troisi C, Fernandez ME, Li R, Reininger B, Schmeler KM, Allanson E. Interventions to increase follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening results: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0291931. [PMID: 38381754 PMCID: PMC10880967 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ensuring timely follow-up of abnormal screening results is essential for eliminating cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to review single and multicomponent interventions designed to improve follow-up of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results. We report on effectiveness across studies, and describe what aspects of these interventions might be more impactful. METHODS Publications were searched between January 2000 and December 2022. The search included observational, quasi-experimental (pre-post studies) and randomized controlled studies describing at least one intervention to increase follow-up of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Outcomes of studies included completion of any follow-up (i.e., attending a follow-up appointment), timely diagnosis (i.e., colposcopy results within 90 days of screening) and time to diagnostic resolution (i.e., days between screening and final diagnosis). We assessed risk of bias for observational and quasi-experimental studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool and the Cochrane collaboration tool for randomized studies. We conducted a meta-analysis using studies where data were provided to estimate a summary average effect of the interventions on follow-up of patients and to identify characteristics of studies associated with an increased effectiveness of interventions. We extracted the comparison and intervention proportions of women with follow-up before and after the intervention (control and intervention) and plotted the odds ratios (ORs) of completing follow-up along with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using forest plots for the interventions vs. controls when data were available. FINDINGS From 7,457 identified studies, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Eleven (39%) of the included studies had used a randomized design. Most studies (63%) assessed completion of any follow-up visit as the primary outcome, whereas others measured time to definite diagnosis (15%) or diagnostic resolution (22%). Navigation was used as a type of intervention in 63% of the included studies. Most interventions utilized behavioral approaches to improve outcomes. The overall estimate of the OR for completion of follow-up for all interventions was 1.81 (1.36-2.42). The highest impact was for programs using more than one approach (multicomponent interventions) to improve outcomes with OR = 3.01 (2.03-4.46), compared with studies with single intervention approaches with OR = 1.56 (1.14-2.14). No statistical risks were noted from publication bias or small-study effects in the studies reviewed. CONCLUSION Our findings revealed large heterogeneity in how follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening results was defined. Our results suggest that multicomponent interventions were more effective than single component interventions and should be used to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Navigation appears to be an important tool for improving follow-up. We also provide recommendations for future studies and implications for policy in terms of better defining outcomes for these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Lopez Varon
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Yimin Geng
- Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Catherine Troisi
- Management, Policy & Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Maria E. Fernandez
- Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ruosha Li
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Belinda Reininger
- Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Brownsville Regional Campus, Brownsville, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kathleen M. Schmeler
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Emma Allanson
- The Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta E, Ng AH, de Moraes AR, Fu JB, Tennison JM, Ahmed M, Fellman BM, Bruera E. Changes in Patterns of Referral for Inpatient Rehabilitation Cancer Patients Due to COVID-19: A Retrospective Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 103:62-65. [PMID: 37602564 PMCID: PMC10840623 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is a paucity of literature on the effect of COVID-19 on hospital processes. We hypothesized that COVID-19 was associated with decreased cancer physiatry referrals in 2020. This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients from April to July 2019 and 2020 admitted at an academic quaternary cancer center. The main outcomes were number of hospital admissions, rate, and characteristics of inpatient rehabilitation admissions and change in percentage of physiatry referrals as the primary endpoint. Results showed that in 2019, there were 387 referrals from 10,274 inpatient admissions (3.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-4.2), compared with 337 referrals from 7051 admissions in 2020 (4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-5.3, P = 0.001). Hematology services referred more patients than neurosurgery in 2020 (20.4% vs. 31.4%; 48.2% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.01). Discharge disposition reflected an increased frequency of return to acute care service in 2020 (10.2% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.03). In conclusion, there was an increase in the rate of physiatry referrals despite a decrease in hospital admissions. There was an increase in referrals by hematology, likely due to emphasis on safe discharge and the populations hospitalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekta Gupta
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Amy H. Ng
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Aline Rozman de Moraes
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Jack B. Fu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Jegy M Tennison
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Maaheen Ahmed
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 7200 Cambridge, Suite 10B, Houston, TX 77030. Phone # 713-798-3518. Present address: University of Michigan, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 100, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-5744. Phone # 734-936-7175. Fax # 734-764-9439
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1411, Houston, TX 77030. Phone #713-745-2341
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Palliative Medicine, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salcedo MP, Lathrop E, Osman N, Neves A, Rangeiro R, Mariano AAN, Nkundabatware JC, Tivir G, Carrilho C, Monteiro ECS, Burny R, Thomas JP, Carns J, Andrade V, Mavume C, Paulo Mugolo R, Atif H, Hoover H, Chivambo E, Chissano M, Oliveira C, Milan J, Varon ML, Fellman BM, Baker E, Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Richards-Kortum R, Schmeler KM, Lorenzoni C. The Mulher Study: cervical cancer screening with primary HPV testing in Mozambique. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1869-1874. [PMID: 37907263 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in Mozambique, a country with one of the highest burdens of cervical cancer globally. METHODS Women aged 30-49 years were prospectively enrolled and offered primary HPV testing using either self-collected or provider-collected specimens. Patients who tested positive for HPV underwent visual assessment for treatment using visual inspection with acetic acid to determine eligibility for thermal ablation. If ineligible, they were referred for excision with a loop electrosurgical excision procedure, for cold knife conization, or for cervical biopsy if malignancy was suspected. RESULTS Between January 2020 and January 2023, 9014 patients underwent cervical cancer screening. Median age was 37 years (range 30-49) and 4122 women (45.7%) were patients living with HIV. Most (n=8792, 97.5%) chose self-collection. The HPV positivity rate was 31.1% overall and 39.5% among patients living with HIV. Of the 2805 HPV-positive patients, 2588 (92.3%) returned for all steps of their diagnostic work-up and treatment, including ablation (n=2383, 92.1%), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (n=169, 6.5%), and cold knife conization (n=5, 0.2%). Thirty-one patients (1.2%) were diagnosed with cancer and referred to gynecologic oncology. CONCLUSION It is feasible to perform cervical cancer screening with primary HPV testing and follow-up in low-resource settings. Participants preferred self-collection, and the majority of screen-positive patients completed all steps of their diagnostic work-up and treatment. Our findings provide important information for further implementation and scale-up of cervical cancer screening and treatment services as part of the WHO global strategy for the elimination of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mila Pontremoli Salcedo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eva Lathrop
- Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Andrea Neves
- Hospital Geral e Centro de Saúde José Macamo, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joseph P Thomas
- Oncology Care & Research IS, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Carns
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Celda Mavume
- Ministério da Saúde de Moçambique (MISAU), Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - Hira Atif
- Ministério da Saúde de Moçambique (MISAU), Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Hannah Hoover
- Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jessica Milan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Melissa Lopez Varon
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ellen Baker
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kathleen M Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paolucci I, Albuquerque Marques Silva J, Lin YM, Fellman BM, Jones KA, Tatsui CE, Weinberg JS, Ruiz J, Tan J, Brock KK, Bale R, Odisio BC. Study Protocol STEREOLAB: Stereotactic Liver Ablation Assisted with Intra-Arterial CT Hepatic Arteriography and Ablation Confirmation Software Assessment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:1748-1754. [PMID: 37563313 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03524-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the technical efficacy and local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) of a standardized workflow for thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) consisting of CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA)-based imaging analysis, stereotactic thermal ablation, and computer-based software assessment of ablation margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS This investigator initiated, single-center, single-arm prospective trial will enroll up to 50 patients (≤ 5 CRLM, Measuring ≤ 5 cm). Procedures will be performed in an angio-CT suite under general anesthesia. The primary objective is to estimate LTPFS with a follow-up of up to 2 years and secondary objectives are analysis of the impact of minimal ablative margins on LTPFS, adverse events, contrast media utilization and radiation exposure, overall oncological outcomes, and anesthesia/procedural time. Adverse events (AE) will be recorded by CTCAE (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), and Bayesian optimal phase-2 design will be applied for major intraprocedural AE stop boundaries. The institutional CRLM ablation registry will be used as benchmark for comparative analysis with the historical cohort. DISCUSSION The STEREOLAB trial will introduce a high-precision and standardized thermal ablation workflow for CRLM consisting of CT during hepatic arteriography imaging, stereotactic guidance, and ablation confirmation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT05361551).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwan Paolucci
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1471, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1471, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yuan-Mao Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1471, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kyle A Jones
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudio E Tatsui
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph Ruiz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jens Tan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristy K Brock
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Reto Bale
- Interventionelle Onkologie-Mikroinvasive Therapie (SIP), Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1471, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin YM, Fellman BM, Taiji R, Paolucci I, Silva JAM, Koay EJ, Avritscher R, Mahvash A, Holliday EB, Lee SS, Kaseb AO, Das P, Vauthey JN, Odisio BC. Salvage Locoregional Therapy Following Progression After Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Associated with Improved Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1867-1875. [PMID: 37268830 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05712-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of salvage locoregional therapy (salvage-LT) on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients presenting with intrahepatic tumor progression following radiotherapy. METHODS This single-institution retrospective analysis included consecutive HCC patients having intrahepatic tumor progression following radiotherapy during 2015-2019. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of intrahepatic tumor progression after initial radiotherapy by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. An inverse probability weighting was used to estimate treatment effect of salvage-LT considering confounding factors. RESULTS A total of 123 patients (mean age ± SD, 70 years ± 10; 97 men) were evaluated. Among those, 35 patients underwent 59 sessions of salvage-LT, including transarterial embolization/chemoembolization (n = 33), ablation (n = 11), selective internal radiotherapy (n = 7), and external beam radiotherapy (n = 8). At a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range, 3.4-54.5 months), the median OS was 23.3 months in patients who received salvage-LT and 6.6 months who did not. At multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh class, albumin-bilirubin grade, extrahepatic disease, and lack of salvage-LT were independent predictors of worse OS. After inverse probability weighting, salvage-LT was associated with a survival benefit of 8.9 months (95% CI: 1.1, 16.7 months; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Salvage locoregional therapy is associated with increased survival in HCC patients suffering from intrahepatic tumor progression following initial radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Mao Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ryosuke Taiji
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Iwan Paolucci
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jessica Albuquerque Marques Silva
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rony Avritscher
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Armeen Mahvash
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sunyoung S Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Foster KI, Shaw KRM, Jin J, Westin SN, Yap TA, Glassman DM, Jazaeri AA, Rauh-Hain JA, Lee S, Fellman BM, Ju Z, Liu Y, Fleming ND, Sood AK. Clinical implications of tumor-based next-generation sequencing in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer 2023; 129:1672-1680. [PMID: 36930815 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor-based next-generation sequencing is used inconsistently as a tool to tailor treatment of ovarian cancer, yet beyond detection of somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, the clinical benefit is not well established. This study aimed to assess the clinical relevance of tumor-based next-generation sequencing (tbNGS) in patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma. tbNGS results were identified in the electronic medical record using optical character recognition and natural language processing. Genetic, clinical, and demographic information was collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were calculated and compared using log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox regression and clustering analyses were used to identify patterns of genetic alterations associated with survival. RESULTS Of 1092 patients in the described population, 409 (37.5%) had tbNGS results. Nearly all (96.1% [393/409]) had one or more genetic alterations. In 25.9% (106/409) of patients, an alteration that aligned with a targeted treatment was identified, and in an additional 48.7% (199/409), tbNGS results suggested eligibility for an investigational agent or clinical trial. The most frequent alterations were TP53, PIK3CA, and NF1 mutations, and CCNE1 amplification. Together, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.92; p = .02), whereas AKT2 amplification was associated with shorter PFS (HR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.002-14.88; p < .05). Multivariate Cox regression and clustering analyses identified several combinations of genetic alterations that corresponded to outcomes in patients with high-grade serous carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS tbNGS often yields clinically relevant information. Detailed analysis of population-level tumor genomics may help to identify therapeutic targets and guide development of clinical decision support tools. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Although more and more patients with ovarian cancer are undergoing tumor-based next-generation sequencing to identify genetic mutations in their tumors, the benefits of such testing are not well established. In a group of over 400 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent tumor-based next-generation sequencing in the course of their treatment, nearly all patients had one or more genetic alterations detected, and one out of four patients had a mutation that qualified them for a personalized treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenna R M Shaw
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeff Jin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy A Yap
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Deanna M Glassman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amir A Jazaeri
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose A Rauh-Hain
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sanghoon Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zhenlin Ju
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yuexin Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole D Fleming
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khlebus E, Vuttaradhi VK, Welte T, Khurana N, Celestino J, Beird HC, Gumbs C, Little L, Legarreta AF, Fellman BM, Nguyen T, Lawson B, Ferri-Borgogno S, Mok SC, Broaddus RR, Gershenson DM, Futreal PA, Hillman RT. Comparative Tumor Microenvironment Analysis of Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors. Mol Cancer Res 2023; 21:483-494. [PMID: 37068116 PMCID: PMC10150241 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-22-0623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Adult-type granulosa cell tumors (aGCT) are rare ovarian sex cord tumors with few effective treatments for recurrent disease. The objective of this study was to characterize the tumor microenvironment (TME) of primary and recurrent aGCTs and to identify correlates of disease recurrence. Total RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on 24 pathologically confirmed, cryopreserved aGCT samples, including 8 primary and 16 recurrent tumors. After read alignment and quality-control filtering, DESeq2 was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEG) between primary and recurrent tumors. Functional enrichment pathway analysis and gene set enrichment analysis was performed using "clusterProfiler" and "GSVA" R packages. TME composition was investigated through the analysis and integration of multiple published RNA-seq deconvolution algorithms. TME analysis results were externally validated using data from independent previously published RNA-seq datasets. A total of 31 DEGs were identified between primary and recurrent aGCTs. These included genes with known function in hormone signaling such as LHCGR and INSL3 (more abundant in primary tumors) and CYP19A1 (more abundant in recurrent tumors). Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that primarily immune-related and hormone-regulated gene sets expression was increased in recurrent tumors. Integrative TME analysis demonstrated statistically significant depletion of cancer-associated fibroblasts in recurrent tumors. This finding was confirmed in multiple independent datasets. IMPLICATIONS Recurrent aGCTs exhibit alterations in hormone pathway gene expression as well as decreased infiltration of cancer-associated fibroblasts, suggesting dual roles for hormonal signaling and TME remodeling underpinning disease relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Khlebus
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Veena K Vuttaradhi
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Welte
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Namrata Khurana
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph Celestino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hannah C Beird
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Curtis Gumbs
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Latasha Little
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alejandra Flores Legarreta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tri Nguyen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barrett Lawson
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sammy Ferri-Borgogno
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samuel C Mok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - David M Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - P Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - R Tyler Hillman
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lin YM, Paolucci I, O’Connor CS, Anderson BM, Rigaud B, Fellman BM, Jones KA, Brock KK, Odisio BC. Ablative Margins of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Deformable CT Image Registration and Autosegmentation. Radiology 2023; 307:e221373. [PMID: 36719291 PMCID: PMC10102669 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Confirming ablation completeness with sufficient ablative margin is critical for local tumor control following colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) ablation. An image-based confirmation method considering patient- and ablation-related biomechanical deformation is an unmet need. Purpose To evaluate a biomechanical deformable image registration (DIR) method for three-dimensional (3D) minimal ablative margin (MAM) quantification and the association with local disease progression following CT-guided CLM ablation. Materials and Methods This single-institution retrospective study included patients with CLM treated with CT-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation from October 2015 to March 2020. A biomechanical DIR method with AI-based autosegmentation of liver, tumors, and ablation zones on CT images was applied for MAM quantification retrospectively. The per-tumor incidence of local disease progression was defined as residual tumor or local tumor progression. Factors associated with local disease progression were evaluated using the multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Local disease progression sites were spatially localized with the tissue at risk for tumor progression (<5 mm) using a 3D ray-tracing method. Results Overall, 213 ablated CLMs (mean diameter, 1.4 cm) in 124 consecutive patients (mean age, 57 years ± 12 [SD]; 69 women) were evaluated, with a median follow-up interval of 25.8 months. In ablated CLMs, an MAM of 0 mm was depicted in 14.6% (31 of 213), from greater than 0 to less than 5 mm in 40.4% (86 of 213), and greater than or equal to 5 mm in 45.1% (96 of 213). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local disease progression was 72% for 0 mm and 12% for greater than 0 to less than 5 mm. No local disease progression was observed for an MAM greater than or equal to 5 mm. Among 117 tumors with an MAM less than 5 mm, 36 had local disease progression and 30 were spatially localized within the tissue at risk for tumor progression. On multivariable analysis, an MAM of 0 mm (subdistribution hazard ratio, 23.3; 95% CI: 10.8, 50.5; P < .001) was independently associated with local disease progression. Conclusion Biomechanical deformable image registration and autosegmentation on CT images enabled identification and spatial localization of colorectal liver metastases at risk for local disease progression following ablation, with a minimal ablative margin greater than or equal to 5 mm as the optimal end point. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sofocleous in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Mao Lin
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Iwan Paolucci
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Caleb S. O’Connor
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Brian M. Anderson
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Bastien Rigaud
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Kyle A. Jones
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (Y.M.L., I.P.,
B.C.O.), Imaging Physics (C.S.O., B.M.A., B.R., K.A.J., K.K.B.), and
Biostatistics (B.M.F.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515
Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Foster KI, Handley KF, Glassman D, Sims TT, Javadi S, Palmquist SM, Saleh MM, Fellman BM, Fleming ND, Bhosale PR, Sood AK. Characterizing morphologic subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer by CT: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004206. [PMID: 36948527 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A novel classification system of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma based on gross morphology observed at pre-treatment laparoscopy was recently defined. The purpose of this study was to identify radiographic features unique to each morphologic subtype. METHODS This retrospective study included 109 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer who underwent pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scanning and laparoscopic assessment of disease burden between 1 April 2013 and 5 August 2015. Gross morphologic subtype had been previously assigned by laparoscopy. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT images for each patient, categorized disease at eight anatomic sites, and assessed for radiographic characteristics of interest: large infiltrative plaques, mass-like metastases, enhancing peritoneal lining, architectural distortion, fat stranding, calcifications, and lymph node involvement. Demographic and clinical information was summarized with descriptive statistics and compared using Student's t-tests, χ² tests, or Fisher exact tests as appropriate; kappa statistics were used to assess inter-reader agreement. RESULTS Certain radiographic features were found to be associated with gross morphologic subtype. Large infiltrative plaques were more common in type 1 disease (88.7% (47/53) vs 71.4% (25/35), p=0.04), while mass-like metastases were more often present in type 2 disease (48.6% (17/35) vs 22.6% (12/53), p=0.01). Additionally, radiographic presence of disease at the falciform ligament was more common in type 1 morphology (33.9% (19/56) vs 13.2% (5/38), p=0.02). CONCLUSION Morphologic subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer were associated with specific CT findings, including the presence of large infiltrative plaques, mass-like metastases, and falciform ligament involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine I Foster
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katelyn F Handley
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Deanna Glassman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Travis T Sims
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology - Body Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah M Palmquist
- Abdominal Imaging Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohammed M Saleh
- Abdominal Imaging Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole D Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priya R Bhosale
- Abdominal Imaging Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin YM, Paolucci I, Anderson BM, O'Connor CS, Rigaud B, Briones-Dimayuga M, Jones KA, Brock KK, Fellman BM, Odisio BC. Study Protocol COVER-ALL: Clinical Impact of a Volumetric Image Method for Confirming Tumour Coverage with Ablation on Patients with Malignant Liver Lesions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1860-1867. [PMID: 36058995 PMCID: PMC9712233 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03255-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the intra-procedural use of a novel ablation confirmation (AC) method, consisting of biomechanical deformable image registration incorporating AI-based auto-segmentation, and its impact on tumor coverage by quantitative three-dimensional minimal ablative margin (MAM) CT-generated assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center, randomized, phase II, intent-to-treat trial is enrolling 100 subjects with primary and secondary liver tumors (≤ 3 tumors, 1-5 cm in diameter) undergoing microwave or radiofrequency ablation with a goal of achieving ≥ 5 mm MAM. For the experimental arm, the proposed novel AC method is utilized for ablation applicator(s) placement verification and MAM assessment. For the control arm, the same variables are assessed by visual inspection and anatomical landmarks-based quantitative measurements aided by co-registration of pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT images. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of the proposed AC method on the MAM. Secondary objectives are 2-year LTP-free survival, complication rates, quality of life, liver function, other oncological outcomes, and impact of AC method on procedure workflow. DISCUSSION The COVER-ALL trial will provide information on the role of a biomechanical deformable image registration-based ablation confirmation method incorporating AI-based auto-segmentation for improving MAM, which might translate in improvements of liver ablation efficacy. CONCLUSION The COVER-ALL trial aims to provide information on the role of a novel intra-procedural AC method for improving MAM, which might translate in improvements of liver ablation efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04083378.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Mao Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Iwan Paolucci
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Brian M Anderson
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, TX, 77030, Houston, USA
| | - Caleb S O'Connor
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, TX, 77030, Houston, USA
| | - Bastien Rigaud
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, TX, 77030, Houston, USA
| | - Maria Briones-Dimayuga
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Kyle A Jones
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, TX, 77030, Houston, USA
| | - Kristy K Brock
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, TX, 77030, Houston, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kurnit KC, Nobre SP, Fellman BM, Iglesias DA, Lindemann K, Jhingran A, Eriksson AGZ, Ataseven B, Glaser GE, Mueller JJ, Westin SN, Soliman PT. Adjuvant therapy in women with early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:452-457. [PMID: 36243601 PMCID: PMC10278585 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine serous carcinoma is a rare but aggressive subtype of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Our objective was to compare adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. METHODS This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. Patients with FIGO Stage IA-II disease after surgery, whose tumors had serous or any mixed serous/non-serous histology were included. Patients with carcinosarcoma were excluded. Clinical data were abstracted from local medical records. Summary statistics, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS There were 737 patients included. Most patients had Stage IA disease (75%), 49% of which had no myometrial invasion. Only 164 (24%) tumors had lymphatic/vascular space invasion. Adjuvant treatment varied: 22% received no adjuvant therapy, 17% had chemotherapy alone, 19% had cuff brachytherapy, 35% had cuff brachytherapy with chemotherapy, and 6% underwent pelvic radiation. Adjuvant treatment was significantly associated with a decreased risk of recurrence (p = 0.04). Compared with no adjuvant therapy, patients who received brachytherapy or brachytherapy/chemotherapy had improved recurrence-free survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, respectively) and overall survival (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.79; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.69, respectively). Improved survival with brachytherapy and brachytherapy/chemotherapy persisted on multivariable analyses. Chemotherapy alone was also associated with improved overall survival compared with no adjuvant treatment (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant therapy was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence relative to observation alone. Adjuvant cuff brachytherapy with and without chemotherapy was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bryan M Fellman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kristina Lindemann
- The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Pamela T Soliman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA..
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sherry AD, Bathala TK, Liu S, Fellman BM, Chun SG, Jasani N, Guadagnolo BA, Jhingran A, Reddy JP, Corn PG, Shah AY, Kaiser KW, Ghia AJ, Gomez DR, Tang C. Definitive Local Consolidative Therapy for Oligometastatic Solid Tumors: Results From the Lead-in Phase of the Randomized Basket Trial EXTEND. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:910-918. [PMID: 35691448 PMCID: PMC11041161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefit of local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastasis across histologies remains uncertain. EXTernal beam radiation to Eliminate Nominal metastatic Disease (EXTEND; NCT03599765) is a randomized phase 2 basket trial evaluating the effectiveness of LCT for oligometastatic solid tumors. We report here the prospective results of the single-arm "lead-in" phase intended to identify histologies most likely to accrue to histology-specific endpoints in the randomized phase. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible histologies included colorectal, sarcoma, lung, head and neck, ovarian, renal, melanoma, pancreatic, prostate, cervix/uterine, breast, and hepatobiliary. Patients received LCT to all sites of active metastatic disease and primary/regional disease (as applicable) plus standard-of-care systemic therapy or observation. The primary endpoint in EXTEND was progression-free survival (PFS), and the primary endpoint of the lead-phase was histology-specific accrual feasibility. Adverse events were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS From August 2018 through January 2019, 50 patients were enrolled and 49 received definitive LCT. Prostate, breast, and kidney were the highest enrolling histologies and identified for independent accrual in the randomization phase. Most patients (73%) had 1 or 2 metastases, most often in lung or bone (79%), and received ablative radiation (62%). Median follow-up for censored patients was 38 months (range, 16-42 months). Median PFS was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 9-24), 3-year overall survival rate was 73% (95% confidence interval, 57%-83%), and local control rate was 98% (93 of 95 tumors). Two patients (4%) had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 toxic effects related to LCT; no patient had grade 4 or 5 toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS The prospective lead-in phase of the EXTEND basket trial demonstrated feasible accrual, encouraging PFS, and low rates of severe toxic effects at mature follow-up. The randomized phase is ongoing with histology-based baskets that will provide histology-specific evidence for LCT in oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tharakeswara K Bathala
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Suyu Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nikesh Jasani
- Department of General Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul G Corn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelsey W Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Handley KF, Sims TT, Bateman NW, Glassman D, Foster KI, Lee S, Yao J, Yao H, Fellman BM, Liu J, Lu Z, Conrads KA, Hood BL, Barakat W, Zhao L, Zhang J, Westin SN, Celestino J, Rangel KM, Badal S, Pereira I, Ram PT, Maxwell GL, Eberlin LS, Futreal PA, Bast RC, Fleming ND, Conrads TP, Sood AK. Classification of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Using Tumor Morphologic Characteristics. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2236626. [PMID: 36239936 PMCID: PMC9568802 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Despite similar histologic appearance among high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs), clinical observations suggest vast differences in gross appearance. There is currently no systematic framework by which to classify HGSOCs according to their gross morphologic characteristics. OBJECTIVE To develop and characterize a gross morphologic classification system for HGSOC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included patients with suspected advanced-stage ovarian cancer who presented between April 1, 2013, and August 5, 2016, to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, a large referral center. Patients underwent laparoscopic assessment of disease burden before treatment and received a histopathologic diagnosis of HGSOC. Researchers assigning morphologic subtype and performing molecular analyses were blinded to clinical outcomes. Data analysis was performed between April 2020 and November 2021. EXPOSURES Gross tumor morphologic characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinical outcomes and multiomic profiles of representative tumor samples of type I or type II morphologic subtypes were compared. RESULTS Of 112 women (mean [SD] age 62.7 [9.7] years) included in the study, most patients (84% [94]) exhibited a predominant morphologic subtype and many (63% [71]) had a uniform morphologic subtype at all involved sites. Compared with those with uniform type I morphologic subtype, patients with uniform type II morphologic subtype were more likely to have a favorable Fagotti score (83% [19 of 23] vs 46% [22 of 48]; P = .004) and thus to be triaged to primary tumor reductive surgery. Similarly, patients with uniform type II morphologic subtype also had significantly higher mean (SD) estimated blood loss (639 [559; 95% CI, 391-887] mL vs 415 [527; 95% CI, 253-577] mL; P = .006) and longer mean (SD) operative time (408 [130; 95% CI, 350-466] minutes vs 333 [113; 95% CI, 298-367] minutes; P = .03) during tumor reductive surgery. Type I tumors had enrichment of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (false discovery rate [FDR] q-value, 3.10 × 10-24), hypoxia (FDR q-value, 1.52 × 10-5), and angiogenesis pathways (FDR q-value, 2.11 × 10-2), whereas type II tumors had enrichment of pathways related to MYC signaling (FDR q-value, 2.04 × 10-9) and cell cycle progression (FDR q-value, 1.10 × 10-5) by integrated proteomic and transcriptomic analysis. Abundances of metabolites and lipids also differed between the 2 morphologic subtypes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study identified 2 novel, gross morphologic subtypes of HGSOC, each with unique clinical features and molecular signatures. The findings may have implications for triaging patients to surgery or chemotherapy, identifying outcomes, and developing tailored therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn F. Handley
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Travis T. Sims
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Nicholas W. Bateman
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center at Inova Health System, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Deanna Glassman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Katherine I. Foster
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sanghoon Lee
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Hui Yao
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jinsong Liu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Zhen Lu
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kelly A. Conrads
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center at Inova Health System, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Brian L. Hood
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center at Inova Health System, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Waleed Barakat
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center at Inova Health System, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Shannon N. Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Joseph Celestino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kelly M. Rangel
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sunil Badal
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| | - Igor Pereira
- Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| | - Prahlad T. Ram
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - George L. Maxwell
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center at Inova Health System, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Livia S. Eberlin
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - P. Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Robert C. Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Nicole D. Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Thomas P. Conrads
- Women’s Health Integrated Research Center at Inova Health System, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Anil K. Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kurnit KC, Fellman BM, Mills GB, Bowser JL, Xie S, Broaddus RR. Adjuvant treatment in early-stage endometrial cancer: context-dependent impact of somatic CTNNB1 mutation on recurrence-free survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:869-874. [PMID: 35483739 PMCID: PMC10811601 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to determine whether women whose tumors harbor a somatic CTNNB1 mutation have longer recurrence-free survival if they receive traditional adjuvant therapy strategies compared with those who do not. METHODS A retrospective, stage I endometrial cancer cohort from MD Anderson Cancer Center was assessed. Clinical and pathological characteristics and type of adjuvant therapy (cuff brachytherapy, pelvic radiation, chemotherapy) were obtained by review of medical records. CTNNB1 exon 3 sequencing was performed. Summary statistics were calculated, and recurrence-free survival was measured using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator. RESULTS The analysis included 253 patients, 245 with information regarding adjuvant therapy. Most patients had tumors of endometrioid histology (210/253, 83%) with superficial myometrial invasion (197/250, 79%) and no lymphatic/vascular space invasion (168/247, 68%). Tumor CTNNB1 mutations were present in 45 (18%) patients. Patients receiving adjuvant therapy were more likely to have higher-grade tumors, non-endometrioid histology, deep myometrial invasion, and lymphatic/vascular invasion. For patients with low-risk features not receiving adjuvant therapy, the presence of CTNNB1 mutation did not significantly impact recurrence-free survival (11.3 years wild-type vs 8.1 years mutant, p=0.65). The cohort was then limited to intermediate-risk tumors, defined as endometrioid histology of any grade with deep myometrial invasion and/or lymphatic/vascular space invasion. When recurrence-free survival was stratified by CTNNB1 mutation status and adjuvant therapy, patients with CTNNB1 mutations and no adjuvant therapy had the shortest recurrence-free survival at 1.6 years, followed by patients with CTNNB1 mutations who received adjuvant therapy (4.0 years), and wild-type CTNNB1 with and without adjuvant therapy (8.5 and 7.2 years, respectively) (comparison for all four groups, p=0.01). CONCLUSION In patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers, the use of adjuvant therapy was associated with an improvement in recurrence-free survival for patients with tumor mutations in CTNNB1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C Kurnit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gordon B Mills
- Division of Oncologic Sciences Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jessica L Bowser
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - SuSu Xie
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cobb LP, Davis J, Hull S, Vining DJ, Fellman BM, Yuan Y, Westin SN, Taylor JS, Bevers MW, Shafer A, Fleming ND, Lu KH, Gershenson DM, Jazaeri AA. A pilot phase II study of neoadjuvant fulvestrant plus abemaciclib in women with advanced low-grade serous carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5522 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated limited activity in low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSOC) of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum, with objective response rate of 11% and complete gross resection (CGR) rate of 38% at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS). LGSOC has many similarities to hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer, including clinical benefit from endocrine therapies in the recurrent and maintenance settings. Based on the activity of antiestrogen plus CDK4/6 inhibitor combination therapy in HR+ breast cancer, we conducted a phase II pilot study to assess the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant treatment with fulvestrant and abemaciclib for women with advanced LGSOC. Methods: Women with unresectable, untreated stage III or IV LGSOC of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum were eligible. Patients received fulvestrant (500 mg IM on day 1 and 15 of the first 28-day cycle, followed by day 1 of subsequent cycles) and abemaciclib 150 mg orally BID. Pre/perimenopausal patients also received goserelin 10.8 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks for ovarian suppression. Patients continued treatment until deemed resectable by the treating surgeon with imaging re-assessment every 8 weeks using RECIST 1.1. Following ICS, patients receive 4 cycles of adjuvant fulvestrant and abemaciclib and then transition to maintenance letrozole. Patients with progressive disease (PD) were removed from study and received standard of care chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is clinical benefit rate (CBR). Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled and evaluable. At data cutoff date (January 20, 2022), 7 of 15 patients (47%) had partial response (PR) (one patient with radiologic PR had a pathologic complete response at ICS), 5 of 15 (33%) had stable disease (SD), and 3 of 15 (20%) had progressive disease (PD), resulting in a CBR of 80%. Of the 7 patients with PR, 3 have had ICS with CGR, 3 have not yet had ICS, and 1 underwent resection of supraclavicular disease with small volume residual disease in the chest. Of the 5 patients with SD, one underwent ICS with CGR, and two have been on treatment for 8 and 16 weeks with reduction in measurable disease but not yet deemed to be candidates for surgery. Four of the 5 patients (80%) who had ICS, had CGR. Median time on study prior to surgery was 24 weeks. Adverse events (grade 3 or 4) possibly related to abemaciclib occurred in 2 patients (13.3%) and included acute kidney injury (6.7%) and neutropenia (6.7%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant treatment with fulvestrant and abemaciclib was tolerable and demonstrated unprecedented response and CGR rates in this pilot study. These results compare favorably to published outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LGSOC. Further studies are planned to explore this new treatment option in a larger study population. Clinical trial information: NCT03531645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren P. Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph Davis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sara Hull
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David J. Vining
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Jolyn Sharpe Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael W. Bevers
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aaron Shafer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nicole D. Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen H. Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David Marc Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amir A. Jazaeri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amaria RN, Vining DJ, Kopetz S, Overman MJ, Javle MM, Antonoff M, Tzeng CWD, Wolff RA, Pant S, Lito K, Rangel KM, Wilson L, Fellman BM, Haymaker CL, Yuan Y, Forget MA, Hwu P, Bernatchez C, Jazaeri AA. Efficacy and safety of autologous expanded tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in multiple solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2536 Background: TIL therapy has been used extensively in metastatic melanoma patients for many years, now with ongoing efforts to commercialize treatment. The efficacy of TIL outside of melanoma is largely unknown thus we designed and implemented a trial using TIL manufactured at a single academic center for treatment refractory metastatic colorectal (CRC), pancreas (PDAC) and ovarian (OVA) cancers. Methods: Patients with CRC, PDAC and OVA refractory to standard therapies with ECOG PS 0-1 and normal organ function were eligible for TIL harvest. Ex vivo TIL expansion and manufacturing was conducted at the MD Anderson TIL lab under conditions that included IL2 and 41BB stimulation (using urelumab). All patients received a lymphodepletion regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg days -7 and -6 and fludarabine 25mg/m2 days -5 through day -1, followed by infusion of pooled ex-vivo expanded TIL. Patients received up to 6 doses of high dose IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg) after TIL infusion. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the objective response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1 criteria with secondary endpoints including disease control rate, duration of response, PFS, OS and safety. Results: A total of 17 patients underwent TIL harvest and 16 were treated on protocol; including 8 CRC, 5 PDAC and 3 OVA. Median age was 57.5 (range 33-70) and 50% were females. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range 1-8). Median number of TIL infused was 76 X 109 (range 20.3 x 109-150 x 109). Median doses of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine administered were 2 (range, 2-2) and 3 (range, 1-5), respectively. Median doses of IL-2 administered was 6 (range, 1-6). There were no responders. Best response included prolonged SD in a patient with PDAC lasting until 18 months. Grade 3 or higher toxicities attributable to therapy was seen in 14 subjects (87.5%; 95% CI: 61.7 – 98.4) with the majority of toxicities representing expected pancytopenia from lymphodepletion. Infusion product analysis showed the presence of effector memory cells with high expression of CD39 irrespective of tumor type. Early on-treatment biopsy of PDAC patient with prolonged SD showed presence of proliferating (KI67+) CD4+ and CD8+ TIL. Conclusions: Generation of TIL at a single academic center for CRC, PDAC and OVA is feasible and treatment is associated with no new safety signals. For these tumor types, further research is required to identify host factors associated with resistance to TIL therapy and optimize manufacturing processes to create more effective TIL cell therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03610490.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David J. Vining
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott Kopetz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Mara Antonoff
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Robert A. Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Foster K, Shaw KR, Jin J, Westin SN, Yap TA, Jazaeri AA, Rauh-Hain JA, Lee S, Fellman BM, Ju Z, Fleming ND, Sood AK. Clinical implications of tumor-based next-generation sequencing in ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5545 Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer is genetically heterogeneous, both among and within histologic subtypes. Advances in next-generation sequencing have made it feasible to ascertain the somatic genetic signature of each patient, however, critical analysis of population-level sequencing results is required to maximize the potential of this technology. Here, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance of tumor-based next-generation sequencing (tbNGS) in a large cohort of patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: Our study population comprised patients with high-grade serous (n = 972), clear cell (n = 33), endometrioid (n = 28), mucinous (n = 4), and mixed (n = 34) or unspecified (n = 21) epithelial ovarian carcinoma diagnosed between April 2013 and September 2021. tbNGS results were identified within the electronic medical record using optical character recognition and natural language processing. Genetic, clinical, and demographic information was collected for patients who had undergone tbNGS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from date of first treatment to date of first recurrence and date of death, respectively. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, and clustering analyses. Results: Of 1092 patients in the described population, 409 (37.5%) had tbNGS results identified. Nearly all (96.1%) revealed one or more genetic aberrations. Most patients (74.6%) had an actionable mutation, defined as relaying eligibility for a targeted treatment or clinical trial. The most frequent alterations were TP53, PIK3CA, and NF1 mutations; and CCNE1 amplification. Ten different targeted institutional and commercial panels were employed, covering a range of 35 to 600+ gene loci. The median time from diagnosis to testing was 14.5 months, likely corresponding to time of recurrence. Though no standalone alterations were significantly related to survival, multivariate and clustering analyses identified several genetic patterns which corresponded to patient outcomes. Mutation of BRAF, PIK3R1, NOTCH3, MET, and/or ATR was correlated with shorter PFS (HR 1.84, p = 0.001); mutation of ATM, RB1, CDKN2A, FGFR1, and/or FGFR2 was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.64, p = 0.04), as was mutation of NBN and/or ATRX (HR 0.54, p < 0.05). MYC, NOTCH3, and/or CREBBP mutations were significantly correlated with worse OS (HR 1.95, p = 0.02). In our population, 40 patients (9.78%) were enrolled in genotypically-relevant clinical trials. Conclusions: tbNGS is prevalent at our institution, and often yields actionable information. We identified several mutational patterns that correlate to patient survival. Detailed analysis of population-level tumor genomics may help to identify therapeutic targets and guide development of clinical decision support tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenna R. Shaw
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeff Jin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Analytics and Informatics, Houston, TX
| | | | - Timothy A. Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Sanghoon Lee
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zhenlin Ju
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nicole D. Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anil K Sood
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wu J, Lakomy DS, Fellman BM, Salcedo MP, Sood AK, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Iyer RB, Jimenez C, Colbert LE, Eifel PJ, Schmeler KM, Lin LL. Longitudinal Changes in Bone Mineral Measurements Inside and Outside Radiation Fields Used for Cervical Cancer Treatment. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:e423-e433. [PMID: 35390531 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared the magnitude of changes in bone mineral density (BMD), within and outside the radiation field, among women who received pelvic radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy for cervical cancer. PATIENTS & METHODS In this secondary analysis of a prospective study, we analyzed serial CT scans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from 78 patients who received definitive RT or chemoradiation (CRT) for cervical cancer at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. BMD values at L1, L2, L3 and L4 were measured. We compared changes in BMD within the radiation field (i.e., at L4) with those outside the field (i.e., at L1). Linear mixed models were also used to examine the effect of RT on changes in BMD over time and covariate adjustment. RESULTS The median age of the 78 patients was 45.5 years (range 23-88); all received RT and 76 (97%) received concurrent CRT. Treatment was associated with significant declines in BMD in all 4 lumbar vertebral bodies over time (P<0.05), with nadir at 3 months for L4 and at 1 year for L1. Pairwise comparisons at 3 months and 2 years after treatment indicated that BMD in L4 (within the RT field) had improved (P=0.037), but BMD in L1 (outside the RT field) was no different at 3 months and 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Significant BMD declines were observed in all lumbar vertebral bodies immediately following RT. However, in-field vertebral bodies reached nadir BMD earlier than those located outside the RT field. Our results suggest that treatment and patient-related factors other than RT may contribute to declines in BMD after treatment for cervical cancer. Routine bone density screening and post-RT therapy with hormones may be beneficial for selected patients who receive CRT for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Wu
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; Departments of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | - David S Lakomy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX; Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH
| | | | - Mila P Salcedo
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Health Sciences/Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Anil K Sood
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ann H Klopp
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX
| | | | - Camilo Jimenez
- Departments of Endocrinology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Lilie L Lin
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmeler KM, Pareja R, Lopez Blanco A, Humberto Fregnani J, Lopes A, Perrotta M, Tsunoda AT, Cantú-de-León DF, Ramondetta LM, Manchana T, Crotzer DR, McNally OM, Riege M, Scambia G, Carvajal JM, Di Guilmi J, Rendon GJ, Ramalingam P, Fellman BM, Coleman RL, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1317-1325. [PMID: 34493587 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the ConCerv Trial was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility of conservative surgery in women with early-stage, low-risk cervical cancer. METHODS From April 2010 to March 2019, a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated conservative surgery in participants from 16 sites in nine countries. Eligibility criteria included: (1) FIGO 2009 stage IA2-IB1 cervical carcinoma; (2) squamous cell (any grade) or adenocarcinoma (grade 1 or 2 only) histology; (3) tumor size <2 cm; (4) no lymphovascular space invasion; (5) depth of invasion <10 mm; (6) negative imaging for metastatic disease; and (7) negative conization margins. Cervical conization was performed to determine eligibility, with one repeat cone permitted. Eligible women desiring fertility preservation underwent a second surgery with pelvic lymph node assessment, consisting of sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or full pelvic lymph node dissection. Those not desiring fertility preservation underwent simple hysterectomy with lymph node assessment. Women who had undergone an 'inadvertent' simple hysterectomy with an unexpected post-operative diagnosis of cancer were also eligible if they met the above inclusion criteria and underwent a second surgery with pelvic lymph node dissection only. RESULTS 100 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age at surgery was 38 years (range 23-67). Stage was IA2 (33%) and IB1 (67%). Surgery included conization followed by lymph node assessment in 44 women, conization followed by simple hysterectomy with lymph node assessment in 40 women, and inadvertent simple hysterectomy followed by lymph node dissection in 16 women. Positive lymph nodes were noted in 5 patients (5%). Residual disease in the post-conization hysterectomy specimen was noted in 1/40 patients-that is, an immediate failure rate of 2.5%. Median follow-up was 36.3 months (range 0.0-68.3). Three patients developed recurrent disease within 2 years of surgery-that is, a cumulative incidence of 3.5% (95% CI 0.9% to 9.0%). DISCUSSION Our prospective data show that select patients with early-stage, low-risk cervical carcinoma may be offered conservative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rene Pareja
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, and Clínica de Oncología Astorga, Medellin, Colombia
| | | | | | - Andre Lopes
- Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Cancer, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Lois M Ramondetta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tarinee Manchana
- Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Orla M McNally
- Royal Women's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin Riege
- Instituto de Ginecología de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Gabriel J Rendon
- Instituto de Cancerologia - Las Américas - AUNA, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Preetha Ramalingam
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu Y, Huang J, Ivan C, Sun Y, Ma S, Mangala LS, Fellman BM, Urbauer DL, Jennings NB, Ram P, Coleman RL, Hu W, Sood AK. MEK inhibition overcomes resistance to EphA2-targeted therapy in uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:181-190. [PMID: 34391578 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our pilot clinical study of EphA2 inhibitor (dasatinib) plus paclitaxel and carboplatin showed interesting clinical activity in endometrial cancer with manageable toxicity. However, the underlying mechanisms of dasatinib resistance in uterine cancer are unknown. Here, we investigated potential mechanisms underlying resistance to EphA2 inhibitors in uterine cancer and examined the anti-tumor activity of EphA2 inhibitors alone and in combination with a MEK inhibitor. METHODS We evaluated the antitumor activity of EphA2 inhibitors plus a MEK inhibitor using in vitro and in vivo orthotopic models of uterine cancer. RESULTS EphA2 inhibitor induced MAPK in dasatinib-resistant uterine cancer cells (HEC-1A and Ishikawa) and BRAF/CRAF heterodimerization in HEC-1A cells. EphA2 inhibitor and trametinib significantly increased apoptosis in cancer cells resistant to EphA2 inhibitors compared with controls (p < 0.01). An in vivo study with the orthotopic HEC-1A model showed significantly greater antitumor response to combination treatment compared with dasatinib alone (p < 0.01). Combination treatment increased EphrinA1 and BIM along with decreased pMAPK, Jagged 1, and c-MYC expression in dasatinib-resistant cells. In addition, Spearman analysis using the TCGA data revealed that upregulation of EphA2 was significantly correlated with JAG1, MYC, NOTCH1, NOTCH3 and HES1 expression (p < 0.001, r = 0.25-0.43). Specifically, MAP3K15 and the NOTCH family genes were significantly related to poor clinical outcome in patients with uterine cancer. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that the MAPK pathway is activated in dasatinib-resistant uterine cancer cells and that EphrinA1-mediated MEK inhibition overcomes dasatinib resistance. Dual targeting of both EphA2 and MEK, combined with chemotherapy, should be considered for future clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutuan Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Jie Huang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Cristina Ivan
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Yunjie Sun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Shaolin Ma
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Lingegowda S Mangala
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Diana L Urbauer
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Nicholas B Jennings
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Prahlad Ram
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fleming ND, Westin SN, Rauh-Hain JA, Soliman PT, Fellman BM, Coleman RL, Meyer LA, Shafer A, Cobb LP, Jazaeri A, Lu KH, Sood AK. Factors associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:65-71. [PMID: 33838925 PMCID: PMC8287765 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the factors associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the ability to undergo interval tumor reductive surgery (iTRS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS We performed a retrospective review from April 2013 to March 2019 of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer triaged to NACT based on our standard triage algorithm. Clinicopathologic and treatment data were analyzed for factors associated with response to NACT, outcomes at iTRS, and their impact on progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS 562 patients met inclusion criteria and triaged to NACT following laparoscopy (n = 132) or without laparoscopy (n = 430). 413 patients underwent iTRS (74%). Factors that correlated with a patient reaching iTRS included increasing age (p < 0.001), higher Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.001), ECOG status 2 or 3 (<0.001), and laparoscopic assessment (<0.001). Patients with CA-125 ≤ 35 U/mL at iTRS had higher rates of complete gross resection (88% vs. 65%, p < 0.001) and improved PFS (16.8 vs. 12.7 months, p < 0.001). Patients receiving dose-dense paclitaxel (76% vs. 60%, p = 0.004) and CA-125 ≤ 35 U/mL at iTRS (85% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) had higher rates of complete radiographic response. On multivariate analysis, germline BRCA 1/2 mutation (p = 0.001), iTRS vs. no surgery (R0, p < 0.001; ≤1 cm, p < 0.001; >1 cm, p < 0.001), dose-dense chemotherapy (p = 0.01), and CA-125 ≤ 35 U/mL at iTRS (p = 0.001) were independent significant factors affecting PFS. CONCLUSIONS Normalization of CA-125 at the time of iTRS following NACT may serve as a surrogate marker for prognosis in this high-risk population. Our NACT cohort experienced improved response rates and PFS with dose-dense therapy compared to conventional dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole D Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Robert L Coleman
- US Oncology Research, The Woodlands, TX. 77380, United States of America
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Aaron Shafer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Lauren P Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Amir Jazaeri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sims TT, Sood AK, Westin SN, Fellman BM, Unke J, Rangel KM, Hilton T, Fleming ND. Correlation of HRD status with clinical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5568 Background: Nearly 50% of patients with high grade ovarian cancer (HGOC) harbor a germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 or have tumors characterized by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD is associated with response to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in HGOC. Although PARPi show great promise, there is interest in investigating how HRD status affects outcomes and can be used to objectively tailor other treatment strategies. We aimed to compare clinical and survival outcomes in HGOC stratified by HRD status. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all advanced HGOC from April 2013 to June 2019. Patients were included if germline BRCA and HRD status was known. Clinical outcomes were analyzed and stratified by (1) germline BRCA+ (2) germline BRCA - and somatic BRCA/HRD+, or (3) BRCA-/HRD-. Progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods stratified by HRD status and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 1271 patients with advanced HGOC presented during the study period of which 187 met inclusion criteria. 106 patients had germline BRCA mutation, 26 somatic BRCA/HRD+, and 55 BRCA/HRD-. Patients who had HRD- tumor had older median age at diagnosis (63 vs. 54 and 60 years, p<0.001), white race (89% vs. 74% and 68%), non-serous histology (20% vs. 6% and 0%, p=0.04), required more NACT chemotherapy cycles (4 vs. 3 and 3 cycles, p=0.03), and less complete gross resection (R0) at tumor reductive surgery (TRS) (60% vs. 83% and 77%, p=0.02). Patients who had BRCA/HRD- tumor had worse PFS (14.9 months) compared to germline BRCA+ (23.5 months) or somatic BRCA/HRD+ (20.2 months, p<0.001). Patients with BRCA/HRD- disease also had worse OS (42.3 months) compared to germline BRCA+ (68.8 months) or somatic BRCA/HRD+ (69.2 months). Multivariate analysis for PFS revealed that age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04), p=0.01), stage (HR 5.7, 95% CI 1.39-23.4, p=0.02), R0 resection at TRS (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.83, p=0.01), and BRCA/HRD- status (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.48, p=0.02) were significant factors impacting PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10, p<0.001) and R0 resection at TRS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.44, p<0.001) were significant factors impacting OS. Conclusions: Germline BRCA-mutant, somatic BRCA/HRD+ HGOC was associated with improved PFS and OS regardless of primary TRS or NACT. BRCA-/HRD- was a negative prognostic factor for survival in HGOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Travis T. Sims
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anil K. Sood
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Tyler Hilton
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Westin SN, Coleman RL, Fellman BM, Yuan Y, Sood AK, Soliman PT, Wright AA, Horowitz NS, Campos SM, Konstantinopoulos PA, Levenback CF, Gershenson DM, Lu KH, Bayer V, Tukdi S, Rabbit A, Ottesen L, Godin R, Mills GB, Liu JF. EFFORT: EFFicacy Of adavosertib in parp ResisTance: A randomized two-arm non-comparative phase II study of adavosertib with or without olaparib in women with PARP-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5505 Background: Wee1 phosphorylates and inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases 1 and 2 and is involved in regulation of the intra-S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoint arrest for premitotic DNA repair. The Wee1 inhibitor, adavosertib, has demonstrated activity alone and in combination with olaparib in PARP inhibitor (PARPi)-resistant preclinical models. We sought to evaluate efficacy of adavosertib (A) with or without olaparib (O) in a phase II noncomparative study of recurrent PARPi-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: Women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer with documented progressive disease on a PARPi were eligible. All patients (pts) had measurable disease and adequate end organ function. On the A arm, pts received A 300mg PO daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle. On the A/O arm, pts received A 150mg PO BID on days 1-3 and 8-10 and O 200mg PO BID on days 1-21 of a 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was objective response per RECIST 1.1 and was assessed every 2 cycles. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as proportion of pts with objective response or stable disease > 16 weeks. Progression free survival (PFS) was assessed using the Kaplan Meier method and calculated from date of treatment initiation to earliest date of progression, death, or last visit. Results: 116 pts were screened with 80 pts enrolled and randomized (A: n=39, A/O: n=41). Median age was 60 years (range 36-76) and the majority of pts had platinum resistant disease (64%) and high grade serous histology (98%). Pts received a median of 4 prior therapies (range 1-11) and 48% had germline or somatic BRCA mutations. There were 35 pts evaluable for response in each arm. Table demonstrates efficacy data. On the A arm, Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 51% of pts, most commonly neutropenia (13%), thrombocytopenia (10%), and diarrhea (8%). 28 (72%) pts required at least one dose interruption and 20 (51%) required dose reduction. On the A/O arm, Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 76% of pts, most commonly thrombocytopenia (20%), neutropenia (15%), diarrhea (12%), fatigue (12%), and anemia (10%). 36 (88%) of pts required at least one dose interruption, 29 (71%) required dose reduction, and 4 (10%) did not restart due to toxicity. Conclusions: A given alone and in combination with O demonstrated efficacy in pts with PARPi-resistant ovarian cancer. Although grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed on both arms, these were generally manageable with supportive care, dose interruptions and dose reductions as needed. Additional translational analyses are ongoing to clarify which pts received clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT03579316. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ying Yuan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anil K. Sood
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karen H. Lu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Virginia Bayer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sobiya Tukdi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nitecki R, Fleming ND, Fellman BM, Meyer LA, Sood AK, Lu KH, Rauh-Hain JA. Timing of surgery in patients with partial response or stable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:660-667. [PMID: 33867146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The ideal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) cycles prior to interval tumor-reductive surgery (iTRS) for advanced ovarian cancer is poorly defined. We sought to assess survival stratified by number of NACT cycles and residual disease following iTRS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) following 3-4 cycles of NACT. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer (diagnosed 2/1/2013 to 2/1/2018) who received at least 3 cycles of NACT and iTRS and had a PR or SD. The population was divided into four groups based on the number of NACT cycles prior to iTRS and residual disease status after (CGR [complete gross residual] or incomplete resection [any amount of residual disease]): 1) 3-4 NACT cycles/CGR, 2) 3-4 NACT cycles/incomplete resection, 3) > 4 cycles/CGR, and 4) >4 cycles/incomplete resection. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using a Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator and modeled using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 265 patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years. Most were White (87%), had serous histology (89%), and stage IV disease (57%), with an overall CGR rate of 81%. In a multivariable analysis receipt of >4 NACT cycles was not associated with worse PFS or OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.74-1.42; aHR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.73-1.72 respectively) than was receipt of 3-4 cycles. Any amount of residual disease was associated with worse PFS and OS regardless of the number of NACT cycles (aHR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.22; aHR 2.38, 95% CI 1.52-3.72 respectively). CONCLUSIONS Residual disease was associated with worse survival outcomes regardless of the number of NACT cycles in patients with PR or SD after NACT for advanced high-grade ovarian cancer. These data suggest that the ability to achieve CGR should take precedence in decision-making regarding the timing of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Nitecki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicole D Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Coleman RL, Hu W, Soliman P, Nick A, Ramirez PT, Westin SN, Garcia ME, Zhu Z, Palancia J, Fellman BM, Yuan Y, Ram P, Bischoff F, Schmeler K, Bodurka D, Meyer LA, Sood AK. Dasatinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in women with advanced-stage or recurrent endometrial cancer: A pilot clinical and translational study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 161:104-112. [PMID: 33551196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of dasatinib therapy on EphA2 signaling in cancers of women with measurable (biopsy amenable) advanced-stage, chemo-naïve primary or recurrent endometrial cancer. Preliminary efficacy was also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a pilot study of single-agent dasatinib lead-in, followed by triplet dasatinib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. We measured the downstream effectors of EphA2 signaling in pre- and post-dasatinib treatment biopsy tissue samples; we also determined the severity of adverse events and patients' progression-free survival and overall survival durations. RESULTS Eighteen patients were recruited and given dasatinib (150 mg orally daily for 14 days), followed by paclitaxel, carboplatin and dasatinib (daily) for six cycles (21-day cycles). Seventeen patients were evaluable for toxicity and 11 patients for response. A reverse phase protein array and proximity ligation assay revealed that CRAF/BRAF dimerization, caveolin-1 level, and Notch pathway signaling were predictive of response and resistance to dasatinib. Overall, the objective response rate was 45% (95% CI: 17%-77%), with median progression-free survival duration of 10.5 months and median overall survival duration of 30.4 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%), thrombocytopenia (53%), anemia (53%), and fatigue (12%). CONCLUSIONS Caveolin-1 expression, in combination with CRAF/BRAF heterodimerization, is associated with resistance to EphA2 targeting by dasatinib. The triplet combination showed interesting clinical activity in endometrial cancer with acceptable toxicity. Pretreatment with dasatinib may accentuate combination therapy toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Wei Hu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Pamela Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Alpa Nick
- Tennessee Oncology from St. Thomas Medical Partners, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Michael E Garcia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Zhifei Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Julieta Palancia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Prahlad Ram
- Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | | | - Kathleen Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Diane Bodurka
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America; Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Narayanan S, Lopez G, Powers-James C, Fellman BM, Chunduru A, Li Y, Bruera E, Cohen L. Integrative Oncology Consultations Delivered via Telehealth in 2020 and In-Person in 2019: Paradigm Shift During the COVID-19 World Pandemic. Integr Cancer Ther 2021; 20:1534735421999101. [PMID: 33655797 PMCID: PMC7934055 DOI: 10.1177/1534735421999101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the use of mobile technologies to deliver health care. This new medical model has benefited integrative oncology (IO) consultations, where cancer patients are counseled about healthy lifestyle, non-pharmacological approaches for symptom management, and addressing questions around natural products and other integrative modalities. Here we report the feasibility of conducting IO physician consultations via telehealth in 2020 and compare patient characteristics to prior in-person consultations conducted in 2019. Methods: An integrated EHR-telemedicine platform was used for IO physician consultations. As in the prior in-person visits, patients completed pre-visit patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments about common cancer symptoms [modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, (ESAS)], Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW), and the PROMIS-10 to assess quality of life (QOL). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs for new telehealth consultation in 2020 were compared to new in-person consultations in 2019 using t-tests, chi-squared tests, and -Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: We provided telehealth IO consultations to 509 new patients from April 21, 2020, to October 21, 2020, versus 842 new patients in-person during the same period in 2019. Most were female (77 % vs 73%); median age (56 vs 58), and the most frequent cancer type was breast (48% vs 39%). More patients were seeking counseling on herbs and supplements (12.9 vs 6.8%) and lifestyle (diet 22.7 vs 16.9% and exercise 5.2 vs 1.8%) in the 2020 cohort than 2019, respectively. The 2020 telehealth cohort had lower symptom management concerns compared to the 2019 in-person cohort (19.5 vs 33.1%). Conclusions: Delivering IO consultations using telehealth is feasible and meets patients’ needs. Compared to patients seen in-person during 2019, patients having telehealth IO consultations in 2020 reported lower symptom burden and more concerns about lifestyle and herbs and supplements. Additional research is warranted to explore the satisfaction and challenges among patients receiving telehealth IO care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Lopez
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Bryan M Fellman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aditi Chunduru
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yisheng Li
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zhong Y, Liu J, Li X, Westin SN, Malpica A, Lawson BC, Lee S, Fellman BM, Coleman RL, Sood AK, Fleming ND. A Modified 2 Tier Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) and Other Histopathologic Features for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Extrauterine High-Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040704. [PMID: 33572451 PMCID: PMC7916221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The impact of chemotherapy response score (CRS) on prognosis has varied among studies. We addressed the prognostic significance of CRS and the prognostic value of previously undescribed histologic features using a cohort of 245 patients. Methods: Retrospective study in patients with advanced extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery from 1990 to 2018 in our hospital. Gynecologic pathologists assessed tumor CRS and other histologic features. Clinical information was collected, and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: A modified 2 tier CRS (CRS 1/2 versus CRS 3) was significantly associated, independent of scoring site (omental versus adnexal), with overall survival (OS) (omentum, p = 0.018; adnexa, p = 0.042; entire cohort, p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.021, p = 0.035, and p = 0.001, respectively). On multivariate survival analysis, 2 tier CRS, oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for OS (p = 0.034, p = 0.020, p = 0.007, and p = 0.010, respectively). Likewise, 2 tier CRS, inflammation, and desmoplasia were significant for PFS (p = 0.012, p = 0.003, p = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions: The modified 2 tier CRS was significantly associated with survival, independent of scoring site. Additional histologic features including oncocytic change, inflammation, and desmoplasia can also predict patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanping Zhong
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.Z.); (X.L.); (A.M.); (B.C.L.)
- Department of Pathology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin, China
| | - Jinsong Liu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.Z.); (X.L.); (A.M.); (B.C.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-713-745-1102
| | - Xiaoran Li
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.Z.); (X.L.); (A.M.); (B.C.L.)
| | - Shannon N. Westin
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.N.W.); (R.L.C.); (A.K.S.); (N.D.F.)
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.Z.); (X.L.); (A.M.); (B.C.L.)
| | - Barrett C. Lawson
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (Y.Z.); (X.L.); (A.M.); (B.C.L.)
| | - Sanghoon Lee
- Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Robert L. Coleman
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.N.W.); (R.L.C.); (A.K.S.); (N.D.F.)
| | - Anil K. Sood
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.N.W.); (R.L.C.); (A.K.S.); (N.D.F.)
| | - Nicole D. Fleming
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (S.N.W.); (R.L.C.); (A.K.S.); (N.D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Armbruster SD, Fellman BM, Jhingran A, Eifel PJ, Klopp AH, Coleman RL, Ramondetta LM, Frumovitz M. A phase III study of transdermal granisetron versus oral ondansetron for women with gynecologic cancers receiving pelvic chemoradiation. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:213-222. [PMID: 32338316 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05484-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare rates of complete response (no emesis, retching, or rescue antiemetics) in the late phase (days 4-7 post-chemotherapy) of cycle 1 between transdermal granisetron and oral ondansetron in cervical, endometrial, or vaginal cancer survivors undergoing chemoradiation at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and LBJ Hospital in Houston, TX. METHODS In this non-blinded parallel design trial, eligible patients received a granisetron patch replaced every 7 days or 8 mg of ondansetron thrice daily continued for 72 h after chemotherapy completion. Data were collected on medication compliance, episodes of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), use of rescue antiemetics, and effects of CINV on quality of life. RESULTS Seventy-five survivors receiving chemoradiation for cervical (n = 61), endometrial (n = 12), or vaginal (n = 2) cancer were electronically randomized to transdermal granisetron (n = 41) or oral ondansetron (n = 34). In the late phase of cycle 1, the rate of complete response was 49.8% (95% CI, 35.2-64.3%) for transdermal granisetron and 39.7% (95% CI, 24.4-56.1%) for oral ondansetron. The posterior probability that transdermal granisetron achieved a higher success rate in controlling late-onset CINV compared with oral ondansetron was 82%. During the acute phase (day 1 post-chemotherapy) of cycles 2 and 3, transdermal granisetron patients used more rescue antiemetics than oral ondansetron patients (p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively). Otherwise, no between-group differences in CINV events were observed. Medication compliance and the effect of CINV on quality of life were similar between groups. CONCLUSION Transdermal granisetron was 82% more like to control CINV than oral ondansetron in the late phase of cycle 1 and performed similarly to oral ondansetron in all other cycles. Transdermal granisetron should be considered an option as prophylactic antiemetic therapy for gynecologic cancer survivors undergoing chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon D Armbruster
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 1 Riverside Circle Suite 300, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Patricia J Eifel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Lois M Ramondetta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cain KE, Iniesta MD, Fellman BM, Suki TS, Siverand A, Corzo C, Lasala JD, Cata JP, Mena GE, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT. Effect of preoperative intravenous vs oral acetaminophen on postoperative opioid consumption in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 160:464-468. [PMID: 33298309 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Both intravenous (IV) and oral acetaminophen provide effective opioid-sparing analgesia after surgery when used as part of a multimodal preemptive pain management strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery who received preoperative IV vs oral acetaminophen within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. METHODS Retrospective data were collected on consecutive patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery from May 1, 2016 to February 28, 2018 in patients receiving either 1 g IV or oral acetaminophen preoperatively. Patients were given a preoperative multimodal analgesia regimen including acetaminophen, celecoxib, pregabalin and tramadol. The primary outcomes were morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) on postoperative days (POD) 0 and 1. Secondary outcomes included highest patient-reported pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and intraoperative MEDD. Regression models adjusted by matched pairs were fit to estimate the average treatment effect of IV vs oral acetaminophen on MEDD. RESULTS Of 353 patients, 178 (50.4%) received IV acetaminophen and 175 (49.6%) received oral acetaminophen. When balancing across the matched samples, there was no difference in postoperative MEDD for POD 0 between the IV and oral acetaminophen groups (Beta = -1.11; 95% CI: -4.83 to 2.60; p = 0.56). On POD 1, there was no difference between the IV and oral groups (Beta = 2.24; 95% CI: -2.76 to 7.25; p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS There was no difference in postoperative opioid consumption between patients receiving preoperative IV or oral acetaminophen within an ERAS program for patients undergoing open gynecologic oncology surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Cain
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Maria D Iniesta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina S Suki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashley Siverand
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Camila Corzo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Javier D Lasala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel E Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fleming ND, Westin SN, Meyer LA, Shafer A, Rauh-Hain JA, Onstad M, Cobb L, Bevers M, Fellman BM, Burzawa J, Bhosale P, Zand B, Jazaeri A, Levenback C, Coleman RL, Soliman PT, Sood AK. Correlation of surgeon radiology assessment with laparoscopic disease site scoring in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:92-97. [PMID: 33154095 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiographic triage measures in patients with new advanced ovarian cancer have yielded inconsistent results. OBJECTIVE To determine the correlation between surgeon radiology assessment and laparoscopic scoring by disease sites in patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer. METHODS Fourteen gynecologic oncology surgeons from a single institution performed a blinded review of pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT imaging from patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. Each of the patients had also undergone laparoscopic scoring assessment, between April 2013 and December 2017, to determine primary resectability using the validated Fagotti scoring method, and assigned a predictive index value score. Surgeons were asked to provide expected predictive index value scores based on their blinded review of the antecedent CT imaging. Linear mixed models were conducted to calculate the correlation between radiologic and laparoscopic score for surgeons individually, and as a group. Once the model was fit, the inter-class correlation and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS Radiology review was performed on 20 patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer who underwent laparoscopic scoring assessment. Surgeon faculty rank included assistant professor (n=5), associate professor (p=4), and professor (n=5). The kappa inter-rater agreement was -0.017 (95% CI -0.023 to -0.005), indicating low inter-rater agreement between radiology review and actual laparoscopic score. The inter-class correlation in this model was 0.06 (0.02-0.21), indicating that surgeons do not score the same across all the images. When using a clinical cut-off point for the predictive index value of 8, the probability of agreement between radiology and actual laparoscopic score was 0.56 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.73). Examination of disease site sub-scales showed that the probability of agreement was as follows: peritoneum 0.57 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.62), diaphragm 0.54 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.60), mesentery 0.51 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.57), omentum 0.61 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.67), bowel 0.54 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.64), stomach 0.71 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.76), and liver 0.36 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.42). The number of laparoscopic scoring cases, tumor reductive surgery cases, or faculty rank was not significantly associated with overall or sub-scale agreement. CONCLUSIONS Surgeon radiology review did not correlate highly with actual laparoscopic scoring assessment findings in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. Our study highlights the limited accuracy of surgeon radiographic assessment to determine resectability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole D Fleming
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aaron Shafer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michaela Onstad
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Cobb
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Bevers
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Burzawa
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Behrouz Zand
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amir Jazaeri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Charles Levenback
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bailey CD, Previs R, Fellman BM, Zaid T, Huang M, Brown A, Enbaya A, Balakrishnan N, Broaddus RR, Bodurka DC, Soliman P, Fleming ND, Nick A, Sood AK, Westin SN. Pathologic distribution at the time of interval tumor reductive surgery informs personalized surgery for high-grade ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:232-237. [PMID: 33122243 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The surgical approach for interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been extrapolated from primary tumor reductive surgery for high-grade ovarian cancer. The study objective was to compare pathologic distribution of malignancy at interval debulking surgery versus primary tumor reductive surgery. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of high-grade serous or mixed, non-mucinous, epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary tumor reductive surgery and had at least 6 months of follow-up were identified through tumor registry at a single institution from January 1995 to April 2016. Pathologic involvement of organs was categorized as macroscopic, microscopic, or no tumor. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Of 918 patients identified, 366 (39.9%) patients underwent interval debulking surgery and 552 (60.1%) patients underwent primary tumor reductive surgery. Median age was 62.3 years (range 25.3-92.5). The majority of patients in the interval debulking surgery group were unstaged (261, 71.5%). In the patients who had a primary tumor reductive surgery, 406 (74.6%) had stage III disease. In both groups, the majority of patients had serous histology: 325 (90%) and 435 (78.8%) in the interval debulking and primary tumor reductive surgery groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between disease distribution on the uterus between the groups; 31.4% of the patients undergoing interval debulking surgery had no evidence of uterine disease compared with 22.1% of primary tumor reductive surgery specimens (p<0.001). In the adnexa, there was macroscopic disease present in 253 (69.2%) and 482 (87.4%) of cases in the interval vs primary surgery groups, respectively (p<0.001). Within the omentum, no tumor was present in the omentum in 52 (14.2%) in the interval surgery group versus 91 (16.5%) in the primary surgery group (p<0.001). In the interval surgery group, there was no tumor involving the small and large bowel in 49 (13.4%) and 28 (7.7%) pathologic specimens, respectively. This was statistically significantly different from the small and large bowel in the primary surgery group, of which there was no tumor in 20 (3.6%, p<0.001) and 16 (2.9%, p<0.001) of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION In patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, there was less macroscopic involvement of tumor in the uterus, adnexa and bowel compared with patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney D Bailey
- Obstretrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Augusta University Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca Previs
- Obstretrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tarrik Zaid
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilyn Huang
- Obstretrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alaina Brown
- Obstretrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ahmed Enbaya
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nyla Balakrishnan
- Public Health, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diane C Bodurka
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pamela Soliman
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole D Fleming
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alpa Nick
- Gynecologic Oncology, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anil K Sood
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shannon Neville Westin
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Umbreit EC, McIntosh AG, Suk-Ouichai C, Segarra LA, Holland LC, Fellman BM, Williams SB, Thomas AZ, Tu SM, Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Ward JF, Wood CG, Karam JA. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy among patients with germ cell tumors using validated grading classifications. Cancer 2020; 126:4878-4885. [PMID: 32940929 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND) is an essential, yet potentially morbid, therapy for the management of patients with advanced germ cell tumors. In the current study, the authors sought to define the complication profile of PC-RPLND using validated grading systems for intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) and early postoperative complications. METHODS Between 2000 and 2018, all patients who underwent PC-RPLND were analyzed for iAEs and early postoperative complications using the Kaafarani and Clavien-Dindo classifications, respectively. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess patient and tumor factors associated with iAEs and postoperative complications. RESULTS Of the 453 patients identified, 115 patients (25%) and 252 patients (56%), respectively, experienced an iAE and postoperative complication. Major iAEs (grade ≥3) were observed in 15 patients (3%) and major postoperative complications (grade ≥3) were noted in 80 patients (18%). The most common iAE was vascular injury (112 of 132 events; 85%), which occurred in 92 patients (20%), and the most frequent postoperative complication was ileus, which occurred in 121 patients (27%). Original and postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass size, nonretroperitoneal metastases, intermediate and/or poor International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification, previous RPLND, elevated tumor markers at the time of RPLND, and anticipated adjuvant surgical procedures increased the risk of both iAEs and postoperative complications. Patients who experienced an iAE were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-3.97 [P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS In what to the authors' knowledge is the first analysis of PC-RPLND using validated classifications for both iAEs and postoperative complications, advanced disease and surgical complexity significantly increased the risks of major iAEs and postoperative complications. Standardized reporting of adverse perioperative events allows providers and patients to appreciate the consequences of PC-RPLND during counseling and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric C Umbreit
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew G McIntosh
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chalairat Suk-Ouichai
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Luis A Segarra
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Levi C Holland
- McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Arun Z Thomas
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Urology, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Surgery, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shi-Ming Tu
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Curtis A Pettaway
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Louis L Pisters
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John F Ward
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cabanillas ME, Dadu R, Ferrarotto R, Liu S, Fellman BM, Gross ND, Gule-Monroe M, Lu C, Grosu H, Williams MD, Duose DY, Mallampati S, Dervin S, Mckenna EF, Wang RJ, Zafereo M, Busaidy NL. Atezolizumab combinations with targeted therapy for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.6514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6514 Background: ATC is a rare/aggressive cancer with dismal outcome. Dabrafenib/trametinib is approved for BRAF-mutated ATC but pts eventually develop resistance. There are no approved drugs for pts with BRAF-wild type ATC. Better treatments (tx) are needed. Methods: ATC pts with PS < 3 enrolled on a prospective trial at a single center, and tx was assigned by driver mutation: BRAF (cohort 1), RAS, NF1, or NF2 (cohort 2), or none of these (cohort 3). Cohort 4 with paclitaxel was exploratory for pts who did not qualify for 1-3. All pts received atezolizumab (A) IV + targeted therapy. Cohort 1 had run-in with vemurafenib (V) 960mg BID/cobimetinib (C) 60mg QD po for 28 days, followed by A 840mg Q2 weeks, at which time V dose was decreased to 720mg BID. Cohort 2: A + C (same doses as cohort 1); cohort 3: A 1200 mg Q3 weeks + bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3 weeks. Pts unable to swallow used alternative drug preparation (ADP; crushed vemurafenib, suspension cobimetinib). Primary objective is to determine whether the tx in cohorts 1-3 leads to improved overall survival (OS). The trial was designed to enroll 36 pts but we are reporting early due to positive findings. Response rate (RR) was measured by RECISTv1.1. Median OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. cfDNA and biopsy were obtained at baseline, course 2 and progression. Pts were allowed to undergo surgery and radiation while on trial. Results: From August 2017-January 2020, 34 ATC pts were enrolled in cohorts 1-3 and 9 in cohort 4. Cohort 3 closed early for futility. 3 pts had ADP. Median follow-up time was 7.51 mos (range: 0.43 – 27.37). Median OS in cohorts 1-3 was 18.23 mos (CI 10.45-NE) and 1-year OS was 67% (95%CI: 45%, 82%). See table. Response rate (RR) in cohort 1 was 71%: CR 1/17 (6%), PR 11/17 (65%), SD 4/17 (23%), 1 never restaged; in cohort 2 RR was 7%: PR 1/14 (7%), SD 7/14 (50%), PD 4/14 (29%), 2 died early. 8 (24% of cohort 1-3) pts had complete tumor resection after tx with VCA (n = 7) or CA (n = 1); all but 1 of these pts are alive. AEs as expected. cfDNA data will be reported at meeting. Conclusions: Atezolizumab + vemurafenib/cobimetinib for BRAF-mutated or + cobimetinib for NF1/2 or RAS-mutated ATC is effective, as evidenced by the long OS in these pts (13 mos > historical control). A significant number of patients, particularly in cohort 1, were able to undergo complete tumor resection due to a favorable response to tx. Clinical trial information: NCT03181100 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ramona Dadu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Suyu Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Neil D. Gross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, TX
| | | | - Charles Lu
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Horiana Grosu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michelle D. Williams
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dzifa Yawa Duose
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Saradhi Mallampati
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Mark Zafereo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Avila M, Fellman BM, Broaddus R. Tumor lymphocytic infiltration impacts recurrence in endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e15239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15239 Background: Endometrial cancers that have mismatch repair deficiency are associated with higher numbers of tumor-associated lymphocytes, but the clinical significance of this observation is unknown. Our objective was to quantify CD3+ and CD8+ tumor lymphocytes of MMR intact (MMRi) and MMRd endometrioid-type endometrial carcinomas and determine if there was an association with survival. Methods: MMRd was defined as endometrial carcinomas with loss of MLH1 expression due to MLH1 gene methylation and determined by immunohistochemistry. MMRi was defined as positive expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. This was followed by Aperio image-based quantification was used to assess CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocyte populations in different regions of the primary endometrial carcinomas, including tumor periphery (tumor-myometrial interface), tumor center (bounded on all sides by tumor), and tumor hotspot (area with highest number of lymphocytes). Recurrence-free survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression. Median follow up time was 44 months. Results: 180 patients with endometrial carcinoma were analyzed of which 132 were MMRi and 48MMRd. The MMRd group had significantly higher levels of CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocytes regardless of which tumor region was assessed (Figure 1a, P < 0.001). Lymphocyte counts in both MMRd and MMRi groups had wide standard deviations such that there was some overlap in counts between the groups (Figure 1). Both MMRd and higher CD3+ counts were associated with worse recurrence-free survival. CD3+ quantification in the tumor periphery captured 21/23 recurrences (Figure 1b, HR = 8.04; 95% CI: 1.88 -34.31; p = 0.005); this included all of the MMRd cases that recurred and 7 MMRi cases with higher numbers of CD3+ lymphocytes that also recurred. Conclusions: MMRd endometrial cancers have increased numbers of CD3+ lymphocytic infiltrates within the primary tumor. Higher CD3+ infiltration is associated with greater risk of recurrence regardless of tumor location. In predicting tumor recurrence, lymphocytic counts performed better than assessment of MMR. Thus, quantification of CD3+ lymphocytes should be explored as a predictive biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Avila
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Salcedo MP, Sood AK, Jhingran A, Eifel PJ, Klopp AH, Iyer RB, Fellman BM, Jimenez C, Schmeler KM. Pelvic fractures and changes in bone mineral density after radiotherapy for cervical, endometrial, and vaginal cancer: A prospective study of 239 women. Cancer 2020; 126:2607-2613. [PMID: 32125711 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in radiotherapy (RT) have led to improved oncologic outcomes for women with gynecologic cancers; however, the long-term effects and survivorship implications need further evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of pelvic fractures and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after pelvic RT. METHODS Two hundred thirty-nine women who had pelvic RT for cervical, endometrial, or vaginal cancer between 2008 and 2015 were prospectively studied. BMD scans and biomarkers of bone turnover were obtained at the baseline and 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after RT. Imaging studies were assessed for pelvic fractures for up to 5 years. Patients with osteopenia, osteoporosis, or pelvic fractures at any point were referred to the endocrinology service for evaluation and treatment. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 51 years; 132 patients (56%) were menopausal. The primary diagnoses were cervical (63.6%), endometrial (30.5%), and vaginal cancer (5.9%). Sixteen patients (7.8%; 95% confidence interval, 4.5%-12.4%) had pelvic fractures with actuarial rates of 3.6%, 12.7%, and 15.7% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Fractures were associated with baseline osteoporosis (P < .001), higher baseline bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (P < .001), and older age (P = .007). The proportion of patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis increased from 50% at the baseline to 58%, 59%, and 70% at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A high proportion of women had significant decreases in BMD after pelvic RT, with 7.8% diagnosed with a pelvic fracture. BMD screening and pharmacologic intervention should be strongly considered for these high-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mila P Salcedo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Health Sciences/Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia J Eifel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Revathy B Iyer
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Camilo Jimenez
- Department of Endocrinology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathleen M Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mitchell KAR, Brassil KJ, Fujimoto K, Fellman BM, Shay LA, Springer AE. Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Patient-Centered Cancer Care Measure to Support Improved Assessment of Patients' Experiences. Value Health 2020; 23:351-361. [PMID: 32197731 PMCID: PMC7086403 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To increase the understanding of patient-centered care (PCC) and address the need for cross-cutting quality cancer care measures that are relevant to both patients and providers. METHODS An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a short version of the Patients and the Cancer Care Experience Survey, a patient-reported measure of perceived importance of social, emotional, physical, and informational aspects of care, administered to adult patients (n = 104) at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Relationships between PCC dimensions and patient characteristics were also assessed. Principal axis factoring was applied and bivariate analyses were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS Most of our sample was over 60 years old (63.4%), female (57.4%), and white (74.2%), with either breast (41.2%) or prostate cancer (27.5%). A 5-factor model was identified: (1) quality of life (α = .91), (2) provider social support (α = .83), (3) psychosocial needs (α = .91), (4) nonprovider social support (α = .79), and (5) health information and decision-making support (α = .88). No statistically significant associations were found between these factors and patients' characteristics. CONCLUSIONS A preliminary factor structure for a cancer PCC measure was identified. Our findings reinforce the interrelated nature of PCC dimensions. The lessons learned from this study may be used to develop a single PCC measure that identifies patient priorities across the cancer care continuum. Data collected from such a measure can be used to support patient engagement in treatment planning and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerri-Anne R Mitchell
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | | | - Kayo Fujimoto
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura Aubree Shay
- Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Andrew E Springer
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yang WL, Lu Z, Guo J, Fellman BM, Ning J, Lu KH, Menon U, Kobayashi M, Hanash S, Celestino J, Skates SJ, Bast RC. Human epididymis protein 4 antigen-autoantibody complexes complement cancer antigen 125 for detecting early-stage ovarian cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:725-736. [PMID: 31714597 PMCID: PMC6992519 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection of ovarian cancer could significantly improve patient outcomes. Cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) is elevated in sera from approximately 60% of patients with early-stage (I/II) disease. Sensitivity might be improved through the combination of CA 125 with other biomarkers. Among potential biomarkers, antigen-autoantibody (Ag-AAb) complexes have received relatively little attention. METHODS Luminex-based immunoassays were used to measure human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), anti-HE4 autoantibody, and HE4 Ag-AAb complexes in sera from patients with early- (n = 73) and late-stage ovarian cancers (n = 49) at the time of diagnosis and from asymptomatic women with (n = 15) or without ovarian cancer (n = 212) enrolled in the Normal Risk Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. RESULTS At 98% specificity for healthy, asymptomatic women, 7% of patients with early-stage (I/II) ovarian cancer and 4% of patients with late-stage (III/IV) disease had elevated levels of HE4 autoantibody, whereas elevated levels of HE4 Ag-AAb complexes were detected in sera from 38% of early-stage cases and 31% of late-stage cases. Complementarity was observed in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves between HE4 Ag-AAb complexes and CA 125 levels in early-stage ovarian cancer (P < .001). CA 125 detected 63% of cases, and a combination of CA 125 and HE4 Ag-AAb complexes detected 81%. Complementarity was also observed in ROC curves for an independent validation set with 69 early-stage patients (P = .039). HE4 Ag-AAb complexes were detected in serial preclinical serum samples from women destined to develop ovarian cancer: they correlated with CA 125 but did not provide a lead time. CONCLUSIONS HE4 Ag-AAb complexes could complement CA 125 in detecting a higher fraction of early-stage ovarian cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Lei Yang
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Odyssey Program, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Zhen Lu
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jing Guo
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Karen H. Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Usha Menon
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Makoto Kobayashi
- Department of Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Samir Hanash
- Department of Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Joseph Celestino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Robert C. Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Soliman PT, Westin SN, Iglesias DA, Fellman BM, Yuan Y, Zhang Q, Yates MS, Broaddus RR, Slomovitz BM, Lu KH, Coleman RL. Everolimus, Letrozole, and Metformin in Women with Advanced or Recurrent Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: A Multi-Center, Single Arm, Phase II Study. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:581-587. [PMID: 31628143 PMCID: PMC7002216 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment for patients with recurrent endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) are limited as paclitaxel is the only second-line chemotherapy with a response rate >13%. Targeting PIK3/mTOR in combination with hormonal therapy has shown promise. The addition of metformin may enhance this response. We conducted a phase II study evaluating everolimus, letrozole, and metformin in advanced/recurrent EEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A Simon two-stage design was employed. Women with ≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens for recurrence were eligible. Pretreatment biopsy was required, followed by everolimus 10 mg orally, letrozole 2.5 mg orally, and metformin 500 mg orally twice a day on a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB), defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) confirmed at 16 weeks. Patients were treated until progression or toxicity. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were enrolled. Median age was 62 years (40-77) with 401 cycles completed, median of 6 cycles (1-31). Fifty-four patients were evaluable for response with a CB rate of 50% (27/54). Best overall response (OR) was PR 28% (15/54) and SD 22% (12/54). Thirteen patients received >12 cycles. Median follow-up was 17.9 months (2-47). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-8.1] and OS was 19.6 months (95% CI, 14.2-26.3). Positive progesterone receptor expression was associated with CB (89.5% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Everolimus, letrozole, and metformin resulted in 50% CB and 28% OR in women with recurrent EEC. Progesterone receptor-positive tumors may have better response; validation studies are needed.See related commentary by Madariaga et al., p. 523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David A Iglesias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ying Yuan
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Melinda S Yates
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Onstad M, Ducie J, Fellman BM, Abu-Rustum NR, Leitao M, Mariani A, Multinu F, Lu KH, Soliman P. Adjuvant therapy for grade 3, deeply invasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:485-490. [PMID: 31980487 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with grade 3, deeply invasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma are typically managed with primary surgery. The role and type of adjuvant therapy used is controversial. We sought to evaluate the role of adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy in women with deeply invasive grade 3 endometrioid tumors. METHODS A multi-center retrospective chart review was performed at three large medical institutions in the United States. Patients with grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma invading >50% of the myometrium were included. Medical records were queried to evaluate whether lymph node assessment was performed, the status of the lymph nodes, adjuvant treatment strategy used, and dates of death or recurrence. RESULTS Between 1984 and 2013, 257 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 3.08 years. Most patients (84.7%) had evaluation of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes and 43% had positive lymph nodes. For node negative patients, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) between those who received adjuvant pelvic radiation +/- vaginal brachytherapy (n=52) vs brachytherapy alone (n=46) (5-year probabilities were 0.73 vs 0.70, P=0.729). Among patients with positive lymph nodes (n=92), the adjuvant treatment strategy utilized impacted OS, with women undergoing a combination of chemotherapy and external beam radiation having the best outcomes (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS Among women with grade 3, deeply invasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma, vaginal cuff brachytherapy alone resulted in similar survival when compared with pelvic radiation in node negative patients. The combination of chemotherapy with external beam radiation was associated with improved OS for women with positive nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Onstad
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Ducie
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Mario Leitao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Karen H Lu
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pamela Soliman
- Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kurnit KC, Sinno AK, Fellman BM, Varghese A, Stone R, Sood AK, Gershenson DM, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, Fader AN, Frumovitz M. Effects of Gastrointestinal-Type Chemotherapy in Women With Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134:1253-1259. [PMID: 31764736 PMCID: PMC7100606 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with standard gynecologic regimens for women with ovarian mucinous carcinoma. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic centers. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy contained 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin. Gynecologic regimens included standard carboplatin or cisplatin. Bevacizumab treatment was allowed in both groups. Summary statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics; Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-two patients received either gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy (n=26; 50%) or a standard gynecologic regimen (n=26; 50%). Three-quarters of tumors were early-stage (I or II), 68% grade 1 or 2 and 88% of patients had no gross residual disease after surgery. Patients receiving gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy were more likely to receive bevacizumab (50% vs 4%; P<.001), but there were no other differences in clinical or demographic characteristics. Unadjusted overall survival analyses showed that gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), as were early stage tumors and having no gross residual disease. CONCLUSION Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab was associated with improved survival and should be considered in patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma requiring adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C. Kurnit
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdulrahman K. Sinno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View/UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aaron Varghese
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anil K. Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David M. Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Fleming ND, Westin SN, Meyer L, Rauh-Hain JA, Shafer A, Onstad M, Cobb LP, Bevers MW, Burzawa JK, Zand B, Fellman BM, Jazaeri AA, Levenback CF, Coleman RL, Soliman PT, Sood AK. Correlation of surgeon radiology assessment with laparoscopic scoring in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.5570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5570 Background: To determine the correlation between surgeon radiology assessment and laparoscopic scoring in patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer. Methods: Following IRB approval, 14 gynecologic oncologists from a single institution performed a blinded review of radiology imaging from 20 patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. All patients previously underwent laparoscopic scoring assessment to determine primary resectability at tumor reductive surgery (TRS) using a validated scoring method from April 2013 to December 2017. The patients with predictive index value (PIV) scores < 8 were offered primary surgery and those with a score ≥8 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Surgeons viewed contrasted CT imaging reports and images from all patients in a blinded fashion and recorded PIV scores using the same validated scoring method. Linear mixed models were conducted to calculate the correlation between radiology and laparoscopic score for each surgeon and as a group. Once the model was fit, the inter-class correlation (ICC) and 95% confidence interval was calculated. Results: Radiology review was performed on 20 patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer who underwent laparoscopic scoring assessment. Most patients had stage IIIC disease (85%) and median laparoscopic score was 9 (range 0-14). Surgeon faculty rank included Assistant Professor (n = 5), Associate Professor (n = 4), and Professor (n = 5). Median surgeon experience during the study period with laparoscopic assessment was 13 cases (range 1-28) and TRS was 22.5 cases (range 2-48). The kappa inter-rater agreement was -0.017 (95% CI 0.023 to -0.005) indicating low inter-rater agreement between radiology review and actual laparoscopic score. The ICC in this model was 0.06 (0.02-0.21) indicating that surgeons do not score the same across all the images. When using a clinical cutoff of PIV of 8, the probability of agreement between radiology and actual laparoscopic score was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.49-0.73). Number of laparoscopic cases, TRS cases, or faculty rank was not significantly associated with agreement. Conclusions: Surgeon radiology review did not correlate highly with actual laparoscopic scoring assessment findings in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. 44% of patients in our study may have been inadequately triaged by radiology review alone, which may have led to suboptimal TRS. Our study highlights the utility of laparoscopic scoring assessment to determine resectability over radiology assessment alone in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Larissa Meyer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Aaron Shafer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michaela Onstad
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Behrouz Zand
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Amir A. Jazaeri
- The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Anil K Sood
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Previs RA, Spinosa D, Fellman BM, Lorenzo A, Mulder I, Mahmoud M, Enbaya A, Hansen JM, Cobb LP, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Secord AA, Westin SN. Bevacizumab beyond progression: Impact of subsequent bevacizumab retreatment in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer after progression. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.5557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5557 Background: The Food and Drug Administration approved the use of bevacizumab for treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma (OC) in combination with chemotherapy. This study evaluates whether patients immediately retreated with bevacizumab derive benefit after progressing on a bevacizumab-containing regimen. Methods: This multi-institutional, retrospective study compared patients with high grade non-mucinous epithelial OC who received bevacizumab followed directly by another bevacizumab-containing treatment regimen to patients who received bevacizumab followed by a regimen that did not contain bevacizumab (or received no further treatment). All patient retreated with bevacizumab had stable or progressive disease on prior bevacizumab containing regimen. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan and Meier product-limit estimator and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. PFS was measured from the date of first bevacizumab treatment to the date of first progression, date of death or date of last clinic visit. OS was measured from the date of first bevacizumab treatment after progression to the date of death or date of last contact/clinic visit. Statistical significance was defined at the 0.05 level. Results: 275 patients received bevacizumab, of which 226 were evaluable; 102 received sequential treatment with bevacizumab and 124 received a bevacizumab containing regimen followed by a non-bevacizumab containing regimen at the time of progression. There was no significant difference between tumor grade, stage, or BRCA mutation. Median follow-up for all subjects was 17 months (range: 1.2-138.2 months). Median PFS was 10.21 months (95%CI: 8.05 - 11.79) and median OS was 22.14 months (95%CI: 17.1 – 27.4). Median PFS for patients who received bevacizumab without retreatment was 5.1 months (95%CI: 4.3 – 6.3) and 17.6 months (95%CI: 14.3 – 21.3) for patients who received sequential bevacizumab retreatment (p < 0.001). Median OS for patients who received bevacizumab without retreatment was 12.9 months (95%CI: 9.3 – 16.7) and 30.1 months (95%CI: 26.1 – 35.4) for patients who received sequential bevacizumab retreatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study shows OC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens sequentially at the time of progression have significantly prolonged survival outcomes compared to those patients who received no re-treatment with bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ann Previs
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Spinosa
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Amelia Lorenzo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Isabelle Mulder
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - May Mahmoud
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ahmed Enbaya
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kurnit K, Pedra Nobre S, Fellman BM, Iglesias DA, Lindemann K, Eriksson AGZ, Atasevan B, Glaser GE, Mueller JJ, Soliman PT. A comparison of adjuvant therapy approaches for patients with early-stage uterine serous carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.5517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5517 Background: Uterine serous carcinoma is a less common subtype of endometrial cancer that is associated with poorer survival. The optimal post-operative adjuvant treatment strategy for these patients remains uncertain. Methods: This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. Patients with FIGO Stage IA-II disease after surgery, whose tumors had serous or mixed serous/non-serous histology were included. Patients with carcinosarcoma were excluded. Clinical data were abstracted from local medical records. Summary statistics, Fisher’s exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 634 patients were included. 77% of patients had Stage IA disease, 42% showed no myometrial invasion. The majority had pure serous histology (72%) and LVSI (76%). Adjuvant treatment varied: 12% received no adjuvant therapy, 7% had chemotherapy alone, 51% had cuff brachytherapy, 12% had cuff brachytherapy with chemotherapy (cuff/chemo), and 19% underwent pelvic radiation (EBRT). Complete RFS and OS data were available for 607 and 609 patients, respectively, and the median follow-up time was 58 months. As compared with patients who received no adjuvant therapy, patients who received cuff or cuff/chemo had improved RFS (cuff: HR 0.70, p = 0.02; cuff/chemo HR 0.53, p = 0.01) and OS (cuff HR 0.56, p = 0.001; cuff/chemo HR 0.48, p = 0.01). In a direct comparison, patients with cuff/chemo had better RFS and OS than those with chemotherapy alone (RFS HR 0.52, p = 0.03; OS HR 0.50, p = 0.05). There were no differences in RFS or OS for women who received chemotherapy alone or EBRT. Improved survival with cuff and cuff/chemo persisted on multivariable analyses (included age, stage, LVSI, adjuvant therapy type); additionally, EBRT was also associated with improved OS. In analyses limited to patients without myometrial invasion, patients with cuff or cuff/chemo had improved RFS and OS compared with observation alone. Conclusions: The use of adjuvant cuff brachytherapy with and without chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS and OS in patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Umbreit E, McIntosh AG, Suk-ouichai C, Segarra L, Holland L, Fellman BM, Tu SM, Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Ward JF, Wood CG, Karam JA. Intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes in post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy using validated grading classifications. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
535 Background: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND) is an integral treatment modality in the management of advanced germ cell tumors. We sought to define the complication profile of PC-RPLND using validated grading systems for intraoperative adverse events (iAE) and early postoperative complications. Methods: After IRB approval, we analyzed perioperative outcomes of 453 patients (pts) who underwent PC-RPLND between 2000 and June 2018. iAE and early postoperative complications (within 90 days) were graded using Kaafarani and Clavien-Dindo classification, respectively. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess patient and tumor factors associated with iAEs and postoperative complications. Results: Of the 453 pts, 287 (63%) were clinical stage III and had a median post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal mass size of 4.1 cm (IQR 2.4-7.4 cm). There were 132 iAE, which occurred in 115 (25%) pts. Early postoperative complications occurred in 255 (56%) pts. Major iAE (grade ≥ 3) was observed in 15 (3%) pts and major postoperative complications (grade ≥ 3) were noted in 83 (18%) pts. The most common iAE was vascular injury (112 of 132 events, 85%), which occurred in 92 (20%) pts. The most common postoperative complication was ileus, occurring in 121 (27%) pts. Residual retroperitoneal mass size (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09–1.20, p<0.001), non-pulmonary metastases (OR = 3.18; 95% CI: 1.68–6.00, p<0.001), previous laparotomy (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.01–3.66, p=0.047), previous RPLND (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.01–5.59, p=0.046), and adjuvant surgical procedures (OR = 13.54; 95% CI: 7.01–26.14, p<0.001) increased the risk of iAE and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were more likely for patients that experienced an iAE (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.58–3.97, p<0.001). Conclusions: This is the first analysis of PC-RPLND defining morbidity using validated classifications of severity for iAE and postoperative complications. Larger retroperitoneal mass, non-pulmonary metastases, previous surgery and adjuvant surgical procedures increased the risk of perioperative complications. iAE increased the risk of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Umbreit
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Luis Segarra
- University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Levi Holland
- University of Texas - Houston, Medical School, Houston, TX
| | | | - Shi-Ming Tu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Jose A. Karam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fang P, Musall BC, Son JB, Moreno AC, Hobbs BP, Carter BW, Fellman BM, Mawlawi O, Ma J, Lin SH. Multimodal Imaging of Pathologic Response to Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:996-1001. [PMID: 29685377 PMCID: PMC6119639 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the value of early changes in quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for discriminating complete pathologic response (pCR) to chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiation followed by surgery were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT scans at baseline, interim (2 weeks after chemoradiation start), and first follow-up. On the basis of pathologic findings at surgery, patients were categorized into tumor regression groups (TRG1, TRG2, and TRG3+). Distributions of summary statistics in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and FDG-PET at baseline and relative changes at interim and follow-up scans were compared between pCR/TRG1 and non-pCR/TRG2+ groups and across readers. Receiver operating characteristics were evaluated for summary measures to characterize discrimination of pCR from non-pCR. RESULTS Relative changes in tumor volume ADC (ΔADC) mean and 25th and 10th percentiles from baseline to interim were able to completely discriminate (area under the curve = 1, P < .0011) between pCR and non-pCR (thresholds = 27.7%, 29.2%, and 32.1%, respectively) and were found to have high interreader reliability (95% limits of agreement of 1.001, 0.944, and 0.940, respectively). Relative change in total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from baseline to interim was significantly different among pCR and non-pCR groups (P=.0117) and yielded an area under the curve of 0.947 (95% confidence interval 0.8505-1.043). An optimal threshold of 59% decrease in TLG provided optimal sensitivity (specificity) of 1.000 (0.867). Changes in ADC summary measures were negatively correlated with that of TLG (Spearman, -0.495, P=.027). CONCLUSIONS Quantitative volume ΔADC and TLG during treatment may serve as early imaging biomarkers for discriminating pathologic response to chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. Validation of these data in larger, prospective, multicenter studies is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin C Musall
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jong Bum Son
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian P Hobbs
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jingfei Ma
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tam S, Boonsripitayanon M, Amit M, Fellman BM, Li Y, Busaidy NL, Cabanillas ME, Dadu R, Sherman S, Waguespack SG, Williams MD, Goepfert RP, Gross ND, Perrier ND, Sturgis EM, Zafereo ME. Survival in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Comparing the AJCC Cancer Staging Seventh and Eighth Editions. Thyroid 2018; 28:1301-1310. [PMID: 30141373 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2017.0572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging System for differentiated thyroid cancer has been recently revised. The purpose of this study was to compare survival prognostication between the seventh and eighth editions. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 2579 differentiated thyroid cancer patients who underwent surgery at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2000 and 2015. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test. The effect of potential predictor was estimated using Cox proportional hazards model. Power of survival prediction was estimated using Harrell's C concordance index (C-index), and predictive capacities for DSS were estimated using proportion of variance explained (PVE). RESULTS Revision of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) categories, age cutoff, and stage reassignment in the 8th edition caused reclassification of overall stage compared with the seventh edition. The proportion of patients in stage I and II increased from 62% to 83% and 5% to 12%, respectively, while the proportion of patients in stage III and IV decreased from 20% to 2% and 14% to 3%, respectively. Ten-year DSS for stages I-IV based on the seventh edition were 100%, 97.5%, 98.3%, and 82.6%, respectively, while 10-year DSS for the corresponding stage in the eighth edition were 99.8%, 88.3%, 72.4%, and 71.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis for both seventh edition (C-index 0.94, PVE 4.6%) and eighth edition (C-index 0.94, PVE 4.8%), the factors predictive of worse outcome for DSS were older age, advanced tumor size category, and distant metastasis while cervical lymph node metastases did not predict worse survival. For the eighth edition, patients <55 years of age with stage II disease had significantly worse DSS (p < 0.001) than patients ≥55 years with stage II disease but appeared to be similar to patients ≥55 years with stage III (p = 0.742) and IV disease (p = 0.566). Patients ≥55 years old with T3a and T3b disease had 10-year DSS of 67% and 92%, respectively (p = 0.390). CONCLUSION The AJCC eighth edition is similar to the seventh edition in disease-specific survival prediction. Potential modifications that may improve disease-specific survival prediction in future renditions include reconsideration of T3b tumor category and upstaging classification of patients <55 years of age with distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Tam
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Mongkol Boonsripitayanon
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
- 2 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Moran Amit
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- 3 Department of Biostatistics, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Yisheng Li
- 3 Department of Biostatistics, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Naifa L Busaidy
- 4 Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Maria E Cabanillas
- 4 Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Ramona Dadu
- 4 Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Steve Sherman
- 4 Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Steven G Waguespack
- 4 Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Michelle D Williams
- 5 Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Neil D Gross
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- 6 Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, and Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Erich M Sturgis
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
- 7 Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| | - Mark E Zafereo
- 1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Petros FG, Venkatesan AM, Kaya D, Ng CS, Fellman BM, Karam JA, Wood CG, Matin SF. Conditional survival of patients with small renal masses undergoing active surveillance. BJU Int 2018; 123:447-455. [PMID: 30007044 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine conditional survival for patients with small renal masses (SRMs) undergoing active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled in a prospective AS protocol at our institution between May 2005 and January 2016. Patients with SRMs ≤4 cm with serial cross-sectional imaging available in-house for review were included. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and modelled via Cox proportional hazards models. The primary endpoints analysed were the conditional probability of survival and tumour growth over time. Landmark analysis was used to evaluate survival outcomes beyond the 2-year mark after the initial scan. The relative conditional survival of patients on AS was compared to those undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS A total of 272 patients were included in this analysis. The mean initial SRM size was 1.74 ± 0.77 cm, and the mean mass size closest to the 2-year mark was 1.97 ± 0.83 cm. The likelihood of continued survival to 5 years improved after the 2-year landmark. Patients with masses <3 cm who survived the first 2 years on AS had a 0.84-0.85 chance of surviving to 5 years, and if they survived 3 years, the probability of surviving to 5 years improved to 0.91. A slow tumour growth (β: 0.12; P < 0.001) with parallel growth rates was found for tumours <3 cm. Patients on AS and those who underwent PN had similar OS for ~7 years, beyond which PN demonstrated a trend of lower risk of death compared with AS (hazard ratio 0.57; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS The conditional survival probability of patients with SRMs <3 cm on AS increased after 2 years. This information may prove useful to urologists and patients who are considering continuing AS vs intervention after the first 2 years on AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Diana Kaya
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chaan S Ng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan M Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Petros FG, Venkatesan AM, Kaya D, Ng CS, Fellman BM, Karam JA, Wood CG, Matin SF. Conditional survival and landmark analysis for patients with small renal masses undergoing active surveillance at a tertiary care center. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
609 Background: Conditional survival can provide guidance for patients once they have survived a period of time after diagnosis of their disease. We determine conditional survival for patients with small renal masses (SRM) undergoing active surveillance (AS). Methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective AS registry at our institution between May 2005 and January 2016. Patients with localized SRM ≤4cm were included, with serial radiologic imaging available in-house for re-review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and modeled via Cox proportional hazards models. The primary end points analyzed were the conditional probability of survival and tumor growth over time. Landmark analysis was used to evaluate survival outcomes. Results: A total of 272 patients were included in this analysis. Mean initial tumor size was 1.74 ± 0.77 cm and mean tumor size closest to the 2-year mark was 1.97 ± 0.83 cm. The likelihood of continued survival to 5 years improved after the 2-year landmark was reached. Patients with tumors < 3cm who survived the first 2-years on AS had a 0.84-0.85 chance of surviving to 5 years, and if they survived 3 years, the probability of surviving to 5 years improved to 0.91. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis of survival revealed eGFR, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and tumor size of 3-4cm were significantly predictive of OS both at baseline and at 2-year mark (all p < 0.05). Patients with a tumor size 3-4 cm were at a greater risk of non-RCC death (HR > 3.5; p ≤ 0.001). A linear mixed effects model revealed slow tumor growth (beta: 0.12; p < 0.001) for tumors < 3cm. Adjusted tumor size predictions disclosed parallel growth rates for SRM of < 2cm and 2-2.99cm with insignificant difference (p = 0.969). Conclusions: Our study provides insight into the survival of patients with SRM on AS who have already survived a certain period of time. The conditional survival probability of patients with SRM < 3cm on AS improved after the initial 2 years, suggesting a role for re-counseling for those who survive to the 2-year landmark. Patient factors (renal function and CCI) were significantly associated with survival at baseline and at the 2-year landmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Diana Kaya
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|