1
|
Gan YK, Ng HK, Morgan WH, Yu DY. Long-Term Morphological Changes of Crosslinked Gelatin Stent. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2025. [PMID: 40292606 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2025] [Accepted: 03/30/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the long-term morphological outcomes of crosslinked gelatin stents over a 10-year period. METHODS Participants from the FDA phase 1 and 2 trials for the XEN 140 stent were recalled for follow-up examinations between 9 and 12 years after their initial implantation. The stent area was evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in conjunction with clinical assessments. We focused on measuring specific alterations in stent dimensions, such as external surface pitting or 'nibbling', complete wall breaches and luminal obstruction. RESULTS We evaluated 11 eyes from 9 patients, with an average follow-up period of 11.2 years (SD ± 0.7). The mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was 22.5 mmHg (SD ± 4.9), which decreased to 14.7 mmHg (SD ± 1.2) a decade after surgery. Notably, four eyes no longer required antiglaucoma medication. Out of the 11 cases, only 8 yielded image quality suitable for analysis, all of which exhibited stent wall nibbling. The average nibbling depth was 70.17 μm (SD ± 36) in the intrascleral area, 79.5 μm (SD ± 18) in the proximal conjunctival region and 42.25 μm (SD ± 5) in the distal conjunctival region. Nibbling was most frequent in the proximal conjunctival area with 26 instances (p = 0.0006), followed by the intrascleral area, 21, and the distal conjunctival section, 9. Hyperreflective lumens were noted in five cases, with one complete stent wall discontinuity. CONCLUSION In cases where imaging provided clear visibility, the stents exhibited signs of morphometric changes after 11 years. This degradation process seems to initiate externally, leading to luminal obstruction and eventual stent failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuen Keat Gan
- Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hong Kee Ng
- Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - William H Morgan
- Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Center for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Dao-Yi Yu
- Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Center for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torbey J, Mansouri K. Cataract surgery combined with glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2025; 36:54-61. [PMID: 39508422 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000001105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review evaluates the surgical management of glaucoma in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Combining both procedures present challenges in balancing intraocular pressure (IOP) control, minimizing postoperative complications, and achieving optimal refractive outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of combined glaucoma and cataract surgeries, with traditional filtering surgeries and MIGS showing significant IOP reduction. The abundance of long-term studies shows that MIGS can offer an effective and safer alternative when carefully tailored to meet the specific needs of each patient. SUMMARY Combining glaucoma and cataract surgery is a promising approach for patients with coexisting conditions. While traditional surgeries offer robust IOP reduction, MIGS procedures offer better safety profiles with fewer complications and more predictable refractive results. Surgeons must carefully consider the timing and choice of procedures, with further research required to develop standardized treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Torbey
- Swiss Visio Glaucoma Research Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kaweh Mansouri
- Swiss Visio Glaucoma Research Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnould L, Balsat E, Hashimoto Y, White A, Kong G, Dunn H, Fan L, Gabrielle PH, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher CP, Lawlor M. Two-year outcomes of Xen 45 gel stent implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry. Br J Ophthalmol 2024; 108:1672-1678. [PMID: 38789132 PMCID: PMC11671995 DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2023-325077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes of the Xen 45 gel stent implant over 24 months of follow-up. METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness observational registry. Complete success (CS) was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction ≥20% from preoperative and an IOP ≤18 mm Hg and ≥6 mm Hg with no secondary procedure at 2 years and without IOP-lowering medications. Qualified success (QS) was defined similarly, allowing the use of IOP-lowering medications. RESULTS The Xen 45 gel stent implant was implanted in 646 eyes of 515 patients. Preoperative IOP was 21.4±7.6 (mean±SD) mm Hg on 2.7±1.3 IOP-lowering medication and mean deviation was -10.2±8.4 dB. After 24-month follow-up, IOP was 16.8±7.3 mm Hg (mean reduction of 21.7%) on 1.2±1.4 IOP-lowering medications. CS and QS rates at 24 months were 26% and 48%, respectively. CS and QS were higher in the Xen stand-alone group (33% and 52%, respectively) than in the Xen+cataract group (16% and 42%, respectively). Bleb needling was performed in 28.4% of cases, and 18% underwent a secondary procedure. CONCLUSIONS The Xen 45 gel stent implant offers acceptable long-term efficacy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. However, there is a significant rate of reoperation and needling, and outcomes are less effective if combined with cataract surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Arnould
- Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France
- Pathophysiology and Epidemiology of Cerebro-Cardiovascular Diseases (PEC2), (EA 7460), Dijon, France
| | - Elise Balsat
- Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Yohei Hashimoto
- Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew White
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Kong
- Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hamish Dunn
- Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leo Fan
- Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pierre-Henry Gabrielle
- Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France
- Eye and Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, INRA Centre de Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Alain M Bron
- Eye and Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, INRA Centre de Dijon, Dijon, France
- Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine P Creuzot-Garcher
- Eye and Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, INRA Centre de Dijon, Dijon, France
- Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Mitchell Lawlor
- Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan PPM, Larson MD, Dickerson JE, Mercieca K, Koh VTC, Lim R, Leung EHY, Samuelson TW, Larsen CL, Harvey A, Töteberg-Harms M, Meier-Gibbons F, Shu-Wen Chan N, Sy JB, Mansouri K, Zhang X, Lam DSC. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2023; 12:537-564. [PMID: 38079242 DOI: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poemen P M Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Lam Kin Chung. Jet King-Shing Ho Glaucoma Treatment and Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Jaime E Dickerson
- Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, North Texas Eye Research Institute, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | | - Victor Teck Chang Koh
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore
- Centre for Innovation and Precision Eye Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ridia Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Save Sight Institute, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Enne Hiu Ying Leung
- The C-MER Dennis Lam & Partners Eye Center, C-MER International Eye Care Group, Hong Kong, China
| | - Thomas W Samuelson
- Minnesota Eye Consultants, Bloomington, MN, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, MN, US
| | - Christine L Larsen
- Minnesota Eye Consultants, Bloomington, MN, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, MN, US
| | | | - Marc Töteberg-Harms
- Department of Ophthalmology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica Belle Sy
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Baguil City, Benguet, Philippines
| | - Kaweh Mansouri
- Glaucoma Center, Swiss Visio, Clinique de Montchoisi, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Xiulan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dennis S C Lam
- The C-MER Dennis Lam & Partners Eye Center, C-MER International Eye Care Group, Hong Kong, China
- The International Eye Research Institute of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|