Comparing Outcomes of 45 Xen Implantation Ab Interno With Closed Conjunctiva to Ab Externo With Open Conjunctiva Approaches

PRCIS

Ab externo with open conjunctiva placement may lead to improved gelatin stent (XEN Gel Stent; Allergan) success rate compared with ab interno with closed conjunctiva because it conferred more favorable intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication burden reduction based on our complete and qualified success criteria.

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of a gelatin stent (XEN 45 Gel Stent; Allergan) placed either ab interno with closed conjunctiva (AIC) or ab externo with open conjunctiva (AEO) with or without cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study of 85 eyes from 85 glaucoma patients who received XEN 45 Gel Stent placed either AIC (N=32) or AEO (N=53) with or without cataract surgery between July 2018 and January 2022 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age or above and had at least 30 days of follow-up without any disqualifying event.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were similar between both groups, except for the glaucoma type. Both AIC and AEO procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction from baseline up to 1 year. At postoperative year (POY)1, mean IOP was reduced to 11.34±4 mmHg on 1.29±1.34 medications after AEO and 13.70±3.32 mmHg on 2±1.81 medications after AIC. The average IOP reduction was significantly greater in the AEO group at all postoperative time points beyond postoperative week 2. There were significant differences in the survival curves of AEO and AIC groups under both the complete success criteria and the qualified success criteria. Under the complete success criteria, the cumulative probability of survival at POY1 was 28.5% in the AEO group and 3.8% in the AIC group. Under the qualified success criteria, the cumulative probability of survival at POY1 was 60.3% in the AEO group and 21.9% in the AIC group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we demonstrate that both placements reduce IOP and medication from baseline, with AEO placement having more favorable success rates compared with AIC placement.

Outcomes of 45 μm gelatin stent surgery over 24-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

The main objectives of this study were to determine whether known risk factors for trabeculectomy failure similarly influence gelatin stent outcomes and to identify surgical factors which may optimise success.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single centre in Perth, Western Australia over 24 months. Two-hundred and sixty-two eyes of 207 patients underwent XEN-45 stent surgery with various forms of glaucoma. Surgical and postoperative data on subjects undergoing XEN-45 stent surgery was collated. Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction success was determined using three criteria: 1; IOP <18 mm Hg, 2: IOP <15 mm Hg and 3: >25% IOP reduction from baseline. Kaplan-Meier, mixed effects Cox Proportional hazard model and Chi-Square test were used to measure survival of functioning stents.

RESULTS

The success rates at a maximum of 2 years after surgery by criteria 1, 2 and 3 were 61.3%, 26.2% and 28.9% in primary open angle glaucoma (n = 243), 18.8%, 16.9%, 21.4% in angle closure glaucoma (n = 11), 0%, 0%, 66.7% in congenital glaucoma (n = 5) and 0% in uveitic glaucoma (n = 3). No significant reduction in success was found in those eyes that had prior ocular surgery (all p > 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior cataract or trabeculectomy surgery does not appear to adversely affect gelatin stent outcomes over 2 years follow up. Gelatin stent surgery appears to have less IOP reduction effect compared to trabeculectomy at 2 years.

Efficacy of the XEN-Implant in Glaucoma and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature

Background: To assess the efficacy of XEN-implant surgery in patients with glaucoma, and to perform a meta-analysis of previously published results and compare these to our data. Methods: Prospective case-control study, in which all eyes that underwent XEN-implant surgery were included from 2015 onwards. Sub-analyses were performed for eyes that underwent XEN-implant as standalone procedure and as cataract-combined procedure. To compare our results, a systematic review was performed using the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane database. Meta-analyses were performed by combining data (intraocular pressure (IOP), IOP-lowering medication, and complications) from the retrieved studies. Results: A total of 221 eyes underwent XEN-implant surgery (124 standalone and 97 cataract-combined). The mean ± standard deviation IOP declined from 18.8 ± 6.5 to 13.5 ± 4.3 mmHg at the last follow-up (p < 0.001; 28.9%). Postoperative, no significant differences in IOP or IOP-lowering medication were found between patients with and without combined procedure. Secondary surgeries were performed in 20.8% of eyes, most of them (63.0%) within six months. A meta-analysis of 19 studies retrieved from the systematic review showed a two-years postoperative pooled mean (weighted mean difference) of 14.5 (7.3) mmHg and 1.0 (1.6) for IOP and IOP-lowering medications, respectively (compared to 13.5 (5.3) mmHg and 3.2 (2.4) in the current study). Conclusion: XEN-implant surgery was effective and safe in lowering IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications. There were no differences between standalone and combined procedures.