Angiography for Management of Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia: Does it Have Any Role?

Considerations on the Management of Acute Postoperative Ischemia After Cardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Acute postoperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) after cardiac surgery is an infrequent event that can evolve rapidly and become a potentially life-threatening complication. Multiple factors are associated with acute PMI after cardiac surgery and may vary by the type of surgical procedure performed. Although the criteria defining nonprocedural myocardial ischemia are well established, there are no universally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of acute PMI. In addition, current evidence on the management of acute PMI after cardiac surgery is sparse and generally of low methodological quality. Once acute PMI is suspected, prompt diagnosis and treatment are imperative, and options range from conservative strategies to percutaneous coronary intervention and redo coronary artery bypass grafting. In this document, a multidisciplinary group including experts in cardiac surgery, cardiology, anesthesiology, and postoperative care summarizes the existing evidence on diagnosis and treatment of acute PMI and provides clinical guidance.

[Peculiariities of diagnostic parameters in patients with acute myocardial lesion after coronary artery bypass grafting]

Annually, up to 850 000 coronary aortic bypass graft operations are performed worldwide. Despite modern technical equipment ensuring a high level of safety of the procedure, currently important remains a problem related to intraoperative myocardial damage in using artificial circulation. Early detection and clinical assessment of myocardial ischaemia often present a difficult task. This article deals with clinical, instrumental and laboratory methods of diagnosis, aimed at verification of an intraoperative cardiac lesion associated with graft dysfunction in coronary artery bypass grafting. Isolated electrocardiographic and echocardiographic signs of myocardial ischaemia between the comparison groups did not differ significantly. Analysing the markers of myocardial lesions, statistically significant differences were obtained only after 48 hours which, from the point of view of saving viable myocardium, is an utterly long-term interval. Studying the findings of intraoperative flowmetry showed statistically significant dependence between velocity characteristics, pulse index of shunts and their patency on angiographic examination. Thus, only combination of diagnostic parameters makes it possible to detect myocardial damage related to shunt dysfunction. This enables early determination of indications for performing bypass angiography and selection of the required therapeutic policy. Timely coronary artery angiography makes it possible to reveal defects of shunts and to timely perform surgical correction, preventing myocardial infarction.

Management of perioperative myocardial ischaemia after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVES

Updated knowledge about perioperative myocardial ischaemia (MI) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and treatment of acute graft failure is needed. We analysed main factors associated with perioperative MI and effects of immediate coronary angiography-based treatment strategy on patient outcome.

METHODS

Among 1119 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent isolated CABG between January 2011 and December 2015, 43 (3.8%) patients underwent urgent coronary angiography due to suspected perioperative MI. All the data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality; postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction) and major adverse cardiac events were secondary endpoints.ResultsOverall, 30-day mortality in patients with CABG was 1.4% while in patients who developed perioperative MI was 9% (4 patients). Angiographic findings included incorrect graft anastomosis, graft spasm, dissection, acute coronary artery thrombotic occlusion and ischaemia due to incomplete revascularisation. Emergency reoperation (Redo) was performed in 14 (32%), acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 15 (36%) and conservative treatment (Non-op) in 14 patients. Demographic and preoperative clinical characteristics between the groups were comparable. Postoperative LVEF was significantly reduced in the Redo group (45% post-op vs 53% pre-op) and did not change in groups PCI (56% post-op vs 57% pre-op) and Non-op (58% post-op vs 57% pre-op).

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent angiography allows identification of the various underlying causes of perioperative MI and urgent treatment when this is needed. Urgent PCI may be associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with early graft failure.