1
|
Ara R, Nasrullah SM, Tasnim Z, Afrin S, Hawlader MDH, Saif‐Ur‐Rahman KM. Effective antimicrobial therapies of urinary tract infections among children in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Pediatr Investig 2023; 7:102-110. [PMID: 37324602 PMCID: PMC10262900 DOI: 10.1002/ped4.12375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections encountered in infancy and childhood. Despite the emerging problem of antibiotic resistance in recent years, the use of antibiotics for better management of UTIs is inevitable. Objective This study aims to explore the efficacy and adverse effects of the available antimicrobial agents that are used in pediatric UTIs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods Five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the available literature. Randomized controlled trials providing antimicrobial interventions in both male and female participants within the age range of 3 months to 17 years in LMICs were included. Results Six randomized controlled trials from 13 LMICs were included in this review (four trials explored the efficacy). Due to high heterogeneity across the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Other than attrition and reporting bias, the risk of bias was moderate to high due to poor study designs. The differences in the efficacy and adverse events of different antimicrobials were not found to be statistically significant. Interpretation This review indicates the necessity for additional clinical trials on children from LMICs with more significant sample numbers, adequate intervention periods, and study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rifat Ara
- Infectious Disease Divisionicddr,bDhakaBangladesh
| | | | - Zarrin Tasnim
- Public Health Professional Development Society (PPDS)DhakaBangladesh
| | - Sadia Afrin
- Health System and Population Studies Divisionicddr,bDhakaBangladesh
| | | | - KM Saif‐Ur‐Rahman
- Health System and Population Studies Divisionicddr,bDhakaBangladesh
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane IrelandUniversity of GalwayGalwayIreland
- College of Medicine, Nursing and Health SciencesUniversity of GalwayGalwayIreland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Liu X, Li K, Fan Y, Yu J, Wu H, Li Y, Wu X, Guo B, Li X, Hu J, Wu J, Cao G, Zhang J. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Doripenem in Healthy Chinese Subjects and Monte Carlo Dosing Simulations. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11070958. [PMID: 35884212 PMCID: PMC9311841 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11070958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of doripenem in healthy Chinese subjects and evaluate the optimal dosage regimens of doripenem. A randomized, single-dose, three-period, self-crossover controlled extended-infusion clinical trial was conducted with 12 healthy Chinese subjects. Plasma and urine samples were collected to determine doripenem concentrations. Non-compartmental and population PK analysis were performed to characterize the PK of doripenem. The Monte Carlo simulation was employed to optimize dosing regimens based on the probability of target attainment of doripenem against pathogens with different minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). All 12 healthy Chinese subjects completed the study, and the doripenem was well tolerated. The study showed linearity relationships in the peak plasma concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve after intravenous infusion of doripenem from 0.25 g to 1.0 g. The cumulative urinary recovery rate of doripenem was 68.1–72.0% within 24 h. PPK modeling showed a two-compartmental model, with first-order elimination presenting the best fit for doripenem PK. Monte Carlo simulation results showed that 1.0 g q12h or 0.5 g q8h was an optimal regimen for pathogens susceptible to doripenem (MIC ≤ 1 mg/L); while high dose and extended infusion (1 g, q8h, 4 h infusion) was proposed for unsusceptible pathogens (2 ≤ MIC ≤ 8 mg/L). In the dose range of 0.25 to 1.0 g, doripenem showed linear pharmacokinetics. Doripenem at 1.0 g with a prolonged infusion time of 4 h was predicted to be effective against pathogens with MICs as high as 8 mg/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Xiaofen Liu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Kun Li
- Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210042, China;
| | - Yaxin Fan
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Jicheng Yu
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Hailan Wu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Yi Li
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Xiaojie Wu
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Beining Guo
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Xin Li
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Jiali Hu
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Jufang Wu
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
| | - Guoying Cao
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Correspondence: (G.C.); (J.Z.)
| | - Jing Zhang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China; (Y.W.); (X.L.); (Y.F.); (H.W.); (Y.L.); (B.G.); (X.L.); (J.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200040, China; (J.Y.); (X.W.); (J.W.)
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
- Correspondence: (G.C.); (J.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dubinsky S, Watt K, Saleeb S, Ahmed B, Carter C, Yeung CH, Edginton A. Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Medications in Children Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review of Current Literature. Clin Pharmacokinet 2022; 61:189-229. [PMID: 34846703 PMCID: PMC8816883 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-021-01085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for renal support has increased substantially in critically ill children compared with intermittent modalities owing to its preferential effects on hemodynamic stability. With the expanding role of CRRT, the quantification of extracorporeal clearance and the effect on primary pharmacokinetic parameters is of the utmost importance. Within this review, we aimed to summarize the current state of the literature and compare published pharmacokinetic analyses of commonly used medications in children receiving CRRT to those who are not. METHODS A systematic search of the literature within electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted. Published studies that were included contained relevant information on the use of commonly administered medications to children, from neonates to adolescents, receiving CRRT. Pharmacokinetic parameters that were analyzed included volume of distribution, total clearance, extracorporeal clearance, area under the curve, and elimination half-life. Information regarding CRRT circuit, flow rates, and membrane components was analyzed to investigate differences in pharmacokinetics between each modality. RESULTS Forty-five studies met the final inclusion criteria within this systematic review, totaling 833 pediatric patients, with 586 receiving CRRT. Antimicrobials were the most common pharmacological class represented within the literature, representing 81% (35/43) of studies analyzed. Children receiving CRRT largely had similar volume of distribution and total clearance to critically ill children not receiving CRRT, suggesting reno-protective dose adjustments may lead to subtherapeutic dosing regimens in these patients. Overall, there was a tendency for hydrophilic agents, with a low protein binding to undergo elevated total clearance in these children. However, results should be interpreted with caution because of the large variability amongst patient populations and heterogeneity with CRRT modalities, flow rates, and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within studies. This review was able to identify that variation in solute removal, or CRRT modalities, properties (i.e., flow rates), and membrane composition, may have differing effects on the pharmacokinetics of commonly administered medications. CONCLUSIONS The current state of the literature regarding medications administered to children receiving CRRT largely focuses on antimicrobials. Significant gaps remain with other commonly used medications such as sedatives and analgesics. Overall reporting of patient clinical characteristics, CRRT settings, and circuit composition was poor, with only 10% of articles including all relevant information to assess the impact of CRRT on total clearance. Changes in pharmacokinetics because of CRRT often required higher than labeled doses, suggesting renally adjusted or reno-protective doses may lead to subtherapeutic dosing regimens. A thorough understanding of the interplay between patient, drug, and CRRT-circuit factors are required to ensure adequate delivery of dosing regimens to this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Dubinsky
- University of Waterloo, School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Watt
- University of Waterloo, School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;,Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | - Caitlin Carter
- University of Waterloo, School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cindy H.T. Yeung
- University of Waterloo, School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Edginton
- University of Waterloo, School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan X, Pan Q, Mo C, Li X, Liang X, Li Y, Lan Y, Chen L. Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e18769. [PMID: 31914101 PMCID: PMC6959894 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is limited by a scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different carbapenem antibiotics for cUTI. Network meta-analysis is a useful tool to compare multiple treatments when there is limited or no direct evidence available. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different carbapenems with alternative antibiotics for the treatment of cUTI. METHODS Pubmed, Medline, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched in November 2018. Studies of cUTI patients receiving carbapenem were included. We performed network meta-analysis to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) from both direct and indirect evidence; traditional meta-analysis was also performed. Primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success. RESULTS A total of 19 studies and 7380 patients were included in the analysis. Doripenem (DOPM) was associated with lower clinical treatment success rates than other carbapenems. Although the efficacy of other carbapenems by RRs with 95% CrIs did not show statistical differences, the cumulative rank probability indicated that meropenem/vaborbactam (MV), ertapenem (ETPM), and biapenem (BAPM) had higher clinical and microbiological treatment success rates; imipenem/cilastatin (IC) and MV showed higher risk of adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS MV was associated with higher treatment success rates for cUTI, especially for cUTI caused by carbapenem-resistant uropathogens, but also with higher risk of AEs. Our findings suggest MV as a first-choice treatment of carbapenem-resistant cUTI. ETPM, BAPM, and meropenem (MEPM) is another reasonable choice for cUTI empiric therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xianshu Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, China
| | - Xueyan Liang
- Department of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, China
| | | | - Lingyuan Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen L, Liang X, Jiang J, Li X, Li Y. Carbapenems vs tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e17436. [PMID: 31577763 PMCID: PMC6783191 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000017436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are common in clinical practice, caused by a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, increase the risk of mortality. Carbapenems and tigecycline (TGC) are recommended for antimicrobial therapies for cIAIs. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and safety of different carbapenems vs TGC for the treatment of cIAIs. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Medline (via Ovid SP) and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different carbapenems vs TGC for the treatment of cIAIs. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was calculated by Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We estimated summary ORs using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects. RESULTS Fifteen studies involving 6745 participants were included in the analysis. Five different carbapenems and TGC were ultimately evaluated in this study. Although, the efficacy of carbapenems and TGC by ORs with corresponding 95% CrIs had not yet reached statistical differences, the cumulative rank probability indicated that clinical treatment success from best to worst was doripenem (DOPM), meropenem (MEPM), imipenem/cilastatin (IC), biapenem (BAPM), TGC and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (ICRB); microbiological treatment success from best to worst was DOPM, MEPM, IC, BAPM, ICRB and TGC. As for the risk of adverse events (AEs), TGC showed higher risk of AEs compared with IC (OR = 1.53, 95% CrI = 1.02-2.41), the remain antibiotic agents from lower to higher was MEPM, IC, BAPM, DOPM, ICRB and TGC. The risk of mortality from lower to higher was BAPM, DOPM, MEPM, IC, TGC and ICRB. CONCLUSION No differences in clinical and microbiological outcomes were observed between different carbapenems and TGC. Balancing the evidence for drug efficacy and side effects, DOPM appears to be the best available treatment for cIAIs. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider that DOPM is one of the best carbapenem monotherapy for cIAIs. MEPM and IC was also associated with higher rates of clinical and microbiological treatment success following DOPM. Empiric antimicrobial treatment of patients with cIAIs should be selected in light of the local bacterial epidemiology and patterns of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Junsong Jiang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, PR China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jan S, Ragunanthan B, DiBrito SR, Alabi O, Gutierrez M. Cefepime Efficacy and Safety in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Front Pediatr 2018; 6:46. [PMID: 29560346 PMCID: PMC5845692 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin antibiotic used to treat a variety of infections. The US Food and Drug Administration approved its use in certain types of infections among pediatric patients, and yet there have been mixed data about its efficacy and safety in this population. OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to compare efficacy and all-cause mortality of cefepime to other clinically indicated antibiotics among children. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, and clinicaltrials.gov databases through February 8, 2016. We included randomized controlled trials comparing cefepime to other clinical antibiotics, placebo, or no treatment in children aged 0-19 years in the inpatient setting with clinical signs of infection. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were success rate, treatment failure, and incidence of adverse events. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. RESULTS Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. There was a total of 1,285 participants included, 624 participants in the cefepime arm and 661 in the comparison arm. A random effects meta-analysis for all-cause mortality showed no difference in rates of mortality between cefepime and comparator antibiotics with a mortality risk ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-1.08). For the secondary outcomes of success rate and treatment failure, a random effects model meta-analysis conducted of the studies showed no difference in rate between cefepime and comparator antibiotics with an overall risk ratio of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.91-1.19), respectively. Adverse events were not statistically assessed given widespread heterogeneity. Overall, the studies had unclear risk of bias and were limited by high heterogeneity and methodological flaws. CONCLUSION The efficacy and safety of cefepime in pediatric patients remain unclear despite the inclusion of newer trials since the last index systematic review conducted a decade ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saber Jan
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatric, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Sandra R. DiBrito
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Maria Gutierrez
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gustinetti G, Cangemi G, Bandettini R, Castagnola E. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters for treatment optimization of infection due to antibiotic resistant bacteria: a summary for practical purposes in children and adults. J Chemother 2017; 30:65-81. [PMID: 29025364 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2017.1377909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
In the last years, there has been a tremendous increase in the incidence of bacterial infections due to resistant strains, especially multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacilli. In Europe, a north to south and a west to east gradient was noticed, with more than one third of the K. pneumonia isolates being resistant to carbapenems in few countries. New antibiotics are lacking and, as a consequence, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, normalized to pathogen minimal inhibitory concentration, are used with increased frequency to treat infections due to difficult-to-treat pathogens. These parameters are available at least for the adult population, but sparse in many different publications. This review wants to provide a comprehensive and 'easy to read' text for everyday practice, briefly summarizing the presently available knowledge on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters (normalized for minimal inhibitory concentration values) of different class drugs, that can be applied for an effective antibacterial treatment infections due to antibiotic-resistant pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Gustinetti
- a Department of Infectious Diseases , University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
| | - Giuliana Cangemi
- b Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Children's Hospital , Genoa , Italy
| | | | - Elio Castagnola
- b Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Children's Hospital , Genoa , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazuski JE, Tessier JM, May AK, Sawyer RG, Nadler EP, Rosengart MR, Chang PK, O'Neill PJ, Mollen KP, Huston JM, Diaz JJ, Prince JM. The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017; 18:1-76. [PMID: 28085573 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2016.261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 359] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous evidence-based guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) were published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) in 1992, 2002, and 2010. At the time the most recent guideline was released, the plan was to update the guideline every five years to ensure the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommendations. METHODS Based on the previous guidelines, the task force outlined a number of topics related to the treatment of patients with IAI and then developed key questions on these various topics. All questions were approached using general and specific literature searches, focusing on articles and other information published since 2008. These publications and additional materials published before 2008 were reviewed by the task force as a whole or by individual subgroups as to relevance to individual questions. Recommendations were developed by a process of iterative consensus, with all task force members voting to accept or reject each recommendation. Grading was based on the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system; the quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, or weak, and the strength of the recommendation was graded as strong or weak. Review of the document was performed by members of the SIS who were not on the task force. After responses were made to all critiques, the document was approved as an official guideline of the SIS by the Executive Council. RESULTS This guideline summarizes the current recommendations developed by the task force on the treatment of patients who have IAI. Evidence-based recommendations have been made regarding risk assessment in individual patients; source control; the timing, selection, and duration of antimicrobial therapy; and suggested approaches to patients who fail initial therapy. Additional recommendations related to the treatment of pediatric patients with IAI have been included. SUMMARY The current recommendations of the SIS regarding the treatment of patients with IAI are provided in this guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Mazuski
- 1 Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , Saint Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Addison K May
- 3 Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Robert G Sawyer
- 4 Department of Surgery, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Evan P Nadler
- 5 Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's National Medical Center , Washington, DC
| | - Matthew R Rosengart
- 6 Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Phillip K Chang
- 7 Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | - Kevin P Mollen
- 9 Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jared M Huston
- 10 Department of Surgery, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine , Hempstead, New York
| | - Jose J Diaz
- 11 Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jose M Prince
- 12 Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, Hofstra-Northwell School of Medicine , Hempstead, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cies JJ, Moore WS, Conley SB, Shea P, Enache A, Chopra A. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Continuous Infusion Doripenem in a Pediatric Patient on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2017; 22:69-73. [PMID: 28337084 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
An 11-year-old African American male with severe combined immunodeficiency variant, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, pancreatic insufficiency, chronic mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection, chronic sinusitis, and malnutrition presented with a 1-week history of fevers. He subsequently developed respiratory decompensation and cefepime was discontinued and doripenem was initiated. Doripenem was the carbapenem used due to a national shortage of meropenem. By day 7 the patient (24.7 kg) had a positive fluid balance of 6925 mL (28% FO), and on days 7 into 8 developed acute kidney injury evidenced by an elevated serum creatinine of 0.68 mg/dL, an increase from the baseline of 0.28 mg/dL. On day 9, the patient was initiated on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and the doripenem dosing was changed to a continuous infusion of 2.5 mg/kg/hr (60 mg/kg/day). Approximately 12.5 hours after the start of the doripenem a serum concentration was obtained, which was 4.01 mg/L corresponding to a clearance of 10.5 mL/min/kg. The pediatric dosing and pharmacokinetic data available for doripenem suggest a clearance estimate of 4.4 to 4.8 mL/min/kg, and the adult clearance estimate is 2.4 to 3.78 mL/min/kg. The calculated clearance in our patient of 10.5 mL/min/kg is over double the highest clearance estimate in the pediatric literature. This case demonstrates that doripenem clearance is significantly increased with CRRT in comparison with the published pediatric and adult data. An appropriate pharmacodynamic outcome (time that free drug concentration > minimum inhibitory concentration) can be achieved by continuous infusion doripenem with concurrent therapeutic drug monitoring.
Collapse
|