Persistence of Hepatitis B Immune Memory Until 6 Years of Age Following Hexavalent DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP~T Vaccination in a 3-, 5- and 11- to 12-month Schedule and Response to a Subsequent Hepatitis B Challenge Vaccination

DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib vaccine (Hexaxim): an update 10 years after first licensure

INTRODUCTION

Hexaxim® is fully liquid, hexavalent, combination vaccine that provides immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, hepatitis B, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Combination vaccines such as Hexaxim reduce the number of injections needed, improving both vaccination compliance and operational efficiency.

AREAS COVERED

Safety and immunogenicity data were reviewed from >25 clinical trials involving approximately 7200 infants/toddlers, identified using PubMed searches to April 2023. These trials have evaluated a diverse range of primary series and booster schedules, including antibody persistence, co-administration of Hexaxim with other routine pediatric vaccines, and specific populations (born to Tdap-vaccinated women, preterm, and immunocompromised infants). Lastly, post-marketing surveillance and real-world effectiveness data were assessed.

EXPERT OPINION

An extensive program of clinical development prior to licensure demonstrated favorable vaccine safety and good immunogenicity of each antigen, and Hexaxim was first approved for use in 2012. In the 10 years since licensure, Hexaxim has been adopted widely, with more than 180 million doses distributed worldwide. The widespread use of this hexavalent vaccine is a crucial tool in the ongoing and future control of six pediatric infectious diseases globally.

A review of the DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T Hexavalent vaccine in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Hexaxim is a hexavalent vaccine approved as primary and booster vaccination in infants 6 weeks and older, protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b.

AREAS COVERED

To evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity (safety) of Hexaxim (Hexyon, Hexacima) in primary and booster vaccine schedules; long-term antibody persistence; concomitant use with other childhood vaccines and use in immunocompromised infants. Hexaxim was found to be noninferior to other licensed hexavalent vaccines, being highly immunogenic for all toxoids/antigens and with an acceptable safety profile. It can be administered concomitantly with other childhood vaccines. Hexaxim can be given as a booster for infants primed with Infanrix Hexa and given in a pentavalent-hexavalent-pentavalent series. Hexaxim elicits a similar immune response and safety profile in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive infants. It has the benefit of being a ready-to-use liquid formulation, minimizing dosage errors and preparation time.

EXPERT OPINION

Hexaxim has an acceptable safety profile and provides immunity against all six targeted diseases. It is an acceptable alternative to other hexavalent vaccines on the market. Further studies are required on the use of immunocompromised patients as well as the antibody persistence of each of the vaccine components.

Hexavalent vaccines: What can we learn from head-to-head studies?

BACKGROUND

Three hexavalent vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) are licensed in Europe: Infanrix hexa (DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib), Hexyon (DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib) and Vaxelis (DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in various electronic databases to identify published peer-reviewed head-to-head studies comparing any licensed hexavalent vaccine to another.

RESULTS

Predefined inclusion criteria were met by 12 articles. Individual studies concluded that the 3 hexavalent vaccines have acceptable safety profiles although some significant differences were observed in their reactogenicity profiles. The immunogenicity of DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib and DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib was non-inferior versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib. Some differences in immune responses to common antigens were observed, but their clinical relevance was not established. Anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) from pertussis and anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) from Hib antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV and anti-pertussis toxin (PT) from pertussis antibody concentrations lower in DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccinees. Anti-PT and post-primary anti-PRP antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV, anti-FHA, anti-pertactin from pertussis and post-booster anti-PRP antibody concentrations lower in DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib recipients. Slightly lower immune responses towards most vaccine antigens were observed with 2 + 1 versus 3 + 1 schedules post-primary vaccination, suggesting that 2 + 1 schedules should only be considered in countries with very high vaccination coverage.

CONCLUSION

Although the licensed hexavalent vaccines are generally considered similar, analyses of immunogenicity data from head-to-head trials highlighted differences that could be related to differences in composition and formulation. In addition, the demonstrated non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the more recent vaccines versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib does not allow a full bridging to similar efficacy, effectiveness and safety. The availability of DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib over > 20 years allowed to collect a wealth of data on its long-term immunogenicity, safety and effectiveness in clinical and post-marketing studies, and makes it a key pillar of pediatric immunization.