Incremental effectiveness of second dose varicella vaccination for outbreak control at an elementary school in Philadelphia, pennsylvania, 2006

Incremental Effectiveness of Emergency Vaccination Against a Varicella Outbreak at an Elementary School in Beijing, China, 2019: An Observational Cohort Study

(1) Background: The effect of varicella emergency vaccination (EV) has not been fully evaluated. (2) Methods: This was a cohort study. Participants were categorized into five groups based on their immune status: unvaccinated group, first dose as EV group, one dose no EV group, second dose as EV group, and two doses no EV group. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to examine the association between the EV measures and the varicella incidence rate in this outbreak. (3) Results: Demographic characteristics, vaccination details, and disease onset information were 100% (918/918) collected. The crude attack rate was 44% (11/25), 8% (3/36), 11% (24/215), 3% (6/176), and 2% (8/466) among the unvaccinated group, first dose as EV group, one dose no EV group, second dose as EV group and two doses no EV group, respectively. Compared to the unvaccinated group and the one dose no EV group, the first dose varicella vaccine as EV and the second dose as EV demonstrated an incremental effectiveness of 90% (95% CI 65-97%) and 79% (95% CI 47-92%), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Both the first dose and the second dose as EV contributed to reducing the incidence rates of varicella and offered incremental vaccine effectiveness in an outbreak setting. Our study underscores the importance and benefits of initiating emergency varicella vaccination early to reduce the disease incidence rate in an elementary school setting where there was no complete coverage of the two doses of varicella vaccine and an outbreak occurred.

Effectiveness of varicella vaccination during an outbreak in a large one-dose-vaccinated population in Shanghai

Emergency vaccination (EV) is used as effective postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to control varicella outbreaks within 3-5 days. However, the advantages of a second dose of varicella vaccine (VarV) in students who had received one dose before an outbreak and the potential benefits of EV at more than 5 days after exposure have not been fully evaluated. This study evaluated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of EV in preventing disease development during a varicella outbreak in Shanghai, China, in 2020. Questionnaires were used to obtain student demographic information, clinical manifestations, varicella history, vaccination status, and willingness to receive EV. The VE of EV was calculated as [1-relative risk (RR)] ×100%. Among the 1455 students included in this study, 31 cases were identified, resulting in an overall attack rate of 2.13%. There were 6 cases in unvaccinated students and 25 cases in one-dose-vaccinated students. A total of 788 students received one EV dose. The attack rates were 6.38% (6/94), 4.26% (19/446), 2.82% (2/71), and 0.56% (4/717) among unvaccinated students, students who received 1 dose of VarV, and students who received EV with the 1^st and 2^nd dose of VarV, respectively. Compared to that in unvaccinated students, the VE of EV with the 2^nd dose of VarV was 88% (95% CI 49% to 97%). EV should be performed as soon as possible after exposure. Nevertheless, vaccination is still recommended at more than 5 days post exposure to control varicella outbreaks.

Effectiveness of varicella vaccine as post-exposure prophylaxis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effectiveness of varicella vaccine (VarV) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) among children during varicella outbreaks.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, Wanfang and CNKI. Relevant outcomes included the incidence of varicella. Pooled estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to the heterogeneity among studies.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies with 7,474 children that received one or two dosages of VarV as PEP and 183,827 children who received no VarV were included in the meta-analysis. In total, one-dose and two-dose VarV as PEP had 43% (95% confidence interval (CI):27%, 55%) and 60% (95%CI: 35%, 75%) efficacy, respectively. When PEP was applied within 3 days, the pooled VarV as PEP for prevention of varicella was 80% (95%CI: 68%, 88%); when PEP was administered beyond 3 days, the pooled VarV as PEP for the prevention of varicella was 50% (95%CI: 11%, 72%). If the PEP was implemented with a coverage of more than 80%, the VarV could prevent 82% of varicella cases from occurring (95%CI: 15%, 96%); if the PEP covered a maximum of 80% of the susceptible cases, the VarV could prevent 65% of varicella cases from occurring (95%CI: 50%, 76%).

CONCLUSION

The two-dose VarV had better efficacy than one-dose VarV in the control of varicella outbreaks, especially if PEP was applied within 3 days of an outbreak and in conjunction with a high coverage rate ≥80%.

Varicella-zoster virus post-exposure management and prophylaxis: A review

Varicella-zoster virus causes both varicella (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (shingles). Although varicella incidence has dramatically declined since introduction of the live-attenuated varicella vaccine, vaccination rates are suboptimal, and outbreaks still occur. Additionally, herpes zoster incidence continues to rise. Severe or fatal complications may result from varicella transmission to at-risk individuals who are exposed to either varicella or herpes zoster. An increasing number of children and adults are receiving immunosuppressive therapies and are at high risk for severe varicella and other complications if exposed to the virus. Clinical management of individuals exposed to varicella-zoster virus should take into consideration the type of exposure, evidence of immunity, and host-immune status with regard to ability to receive varicella vaccination safely. Post-exposure varicella vaccination may prevent infection or mitigate disease severity in persons eligible for vaccination. Post-exposure prophylaxis with varicella zoster immune globulin is indicated for populations ineligible for vaccination, including immunocompromised children and adults, pregnant women, newborns of mothers with varicella shortly before or after delivery, and premature infants. Appropriate post-exposure management of individuals exposed to either varicella or herpes zoster-including assessment of immune status and rapid provision of optimal prophylaxis-can help avoid potentially devastating complications of varicella-zoster virus infection.

Strong Additional Effect of a Second Varicella Vaccine Dose in Children in Germany, 2009-2014

OBJECTIVES

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 1 and 2 varicella vaccine doses in children aged 1-4 years in Germany was evaluated to determine the additional effect of a second dose recommended at least 4 weeks after the first dose and before the second birthday.

STUDY DESIGN

To estimate the VE, the proportion of cases vaccinated was compared with the proportion of the population vaccinated using nationwide sentinel surveillance data from 2009-2014 and health insurance claims data covering the period January 2009-March 2014, respectively. A general linear model was used to estimate the OR of vaccination in the cases and the population and the corresponding CIs to observe the stability of the VE estimates over time, and to assess the incremental effectiveness of a second dose.

RESULTS

The overall VE after 1 dose was 86.6% (95% CI: 85.2-87.9), ranging between 94.6% (95% CI: 87.9-97.6) in the first quarter of 2011 and 50.3% (95% CI: 7.3-73.4) in the third quarter of 2013. The overall VE after 2 doses was 97.3% (95% CI: 97.0-97.6), ranging between 99.5% (95% CI: 97.8-99.9) in the second quarter of 2009 and 91.3% (95% CI: 85.7-94.8) in the third quarter of 2013. The incremental VE of 2 doses was 84.6% (95% CI: 81.7-86.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The substantially higher VE of 2 varicella vaccine doses compared with 1 dose in young children and the strong additional effect of the second dose support the public health relevance of a 2-dose schedule and the success of the early second vaccine dose.

Varicella Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Community Transmission in the 2-Dose Era

OBJECTIVES

We examined overall and incremental effectiveness of 2-dose varicella vaccination in preventing community transmission of varicella among children aged 4 to 18 years in 2 active surveillance sites. One-dose varicella vaccine effectiveness (VE) was examined in those aged 1 to 18 years.

METHODS

From May 2009 through June 2011, varicella cases identified during active surveillance in Antelope Valley, CA and Philadelphia, PA were enrolled into a matched case-control study. Matched controls within 2 years of the patient's age were selected from immunization registries. A standardized questionnaire was administered to participants' parents, and varicella vaccination history was obtained from health care provider, immunization registry, or parent records. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate varicella VE against clinically diagnosed and laboratory-confirmed varicella.

RESULTS

A total of 125 clinically diagnosed varicella cases and 408 matched controls were enrolled. Twenty-nine cases were laboratory confirmed. One-dose VE (1-dose versus unvaccinated) was 75.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.7%-90.3%) in preventing any clinically diagnosed varicella and 78.1% (95% CI, 12.7%-94.5%) against moderate or severe, clinically diagnosed disease (≥50 lesions). Among subjects aged ≥4 years, 2-dose VE (2-dose versus unvaccinated) was 93.6% (95% CI, 75.6%-98.3%) against any varicella and 97.9% (95% CI, 83.0%-99.7%) against moderate or severe varicella. Incremental effectiveness (2-dose versus 1-dose) was 87.5% against clinically diagnosed varicella and 97.3% against laboratory-confirmed varicella.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-dose varicella vaccination offered better protection against varicella from community transmission among school-aged children compared with 1-dose vaccination.

Global Varicella Vaccine Effectiveness: A Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Several varicella vaccines are available worldwide. Countries with a varicella vaccination program use 1- or 2-dose schedules.

OBJECTIVE

We examined postlicensure estimates of varicella vaccine effectiveness (VE) among healthy children.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review and descriptive and meta-analysis of Medline, Embase, Cochrane libraries, and CINAHL databases for reports published during 1995-2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Publications that reported original data on dose-specific varicella VE among immunocompetent children.

DATA EXTRACTION

We used random effects meta-analysis models to obtain pooled one dose VE estimates by disease severity (all varicella and moderate/severe varicella). Within each severity category, we assessed pooled VE by vaccine and by study design. We used descriptive statistics to summarize 1-dose VE against severe disease. For 2-dose VE, we calculated pooled estimates against all varicella and by study design.

RESULTS

The pooled 1-dose VE was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78%-84%) against all varicella and 98% (95% CI: 97%-99%) against moderate/severe varicella with no significant association between VE and vaccine type or study design (P > .1). For 1 dose, median VE for prevention of severe disease was 100% (mean = 99.4%). The pooled 2-dose VE against all varicella was 92% (95% CI: 88%-95%), with similar estimates by study design.

LIMITATIONS

VE was assessed primarily during outbreak investigations and using clinically diagnosed varicella.

CONCLUSIONS

One dose of varicella vaccine was moderately effective in preventing all varicella and highly effective in preventing moderate/severe varicella, with no differences by vaccine. The second dose adds improved protection against all varicella.

[Varicella vaccination in Germany. A provisional appraisal in the context of MMR vaccination]

In 2004, a general varicella immunization was introduced in Germany for infants from the age of 11 months, followed by the subsequent recommendation in 2009 of a second vaccine dose. The vaccination is carried out at the same time as the immunization against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR). Results of the nationwide sentinel surveillance of varicella and herpes zoster implemented by the Varicella Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Varizellen, AGV) show that the defined goals for varicella immunization (reduction of varicella-related morbidity, complications and hospitalizations) have been reached within a few years owing to the advances in vaccine coverage. Although coverage rates for varicella have not yet reached the same levels as for MMR, varicella immunization seems to have benefited from the established MMR immunization schedule. Moreover, there is no evidence for an adverse effect on the use and acceptance of the MMR vaccine. Lessons learnt in measles epidemiology (such as trends in the incidence of the disease in adolescents and infants), as well as in the history of MMR recommendations, may be useful for the evaluation of future epidemiological changes with respect to varicella and herpes zoster. In view of a rapidly waning immunity against the varicella zoster virus after vaccination with one dose and the lifelong persistence of the virus, achieving a robust and sustainable immunity in the general population seems to be an ambitious goal. However, this accomplishment will be indispensable in preventing breakthrough infections and a shift of varicella to older ages and in avoiding an increase in herpes zoster incidence.

Using a scripted data entry process to transfer legacy immunization data while transitioning between electronic medical record systems

BACKGROUND

Transitioning between Electronic Medical Records (EMR) can result in patient data being stranded in legacy systems with subsequent failure to provide appropriate patient care. Manual chart abstraction is labor intensive, error-prone, and difficult to institute for immunizations on a systems level in a timely fashion.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to transfer immunization data from two of our health system's soon to be replaced EMRs to the future EMR using a single process instead of separate interfaces for each facility.

METHODS

We used scripted data entry, a process where a computer automates manual data entry, to insert data into the future EMR. Using the Center for Disease Control's CVX immunization codes we developed a bridge between immunization identifiers within our system's EMRs. We performed a two-step process evaluation of the data transfer using automated data comparison and manual chart review.

RESULTS

We completed the data migration from two facilities in 16.8 hours with no data loss or corruption. We successfully populated the future EMR with 99.16% of our legacy immunization data - 500,906 records - just prior to our EMR transition date. A subset of immunizations, first recognized during clinical care, had not originally been extracted from the legacy systems. Once identified, this data - 1,695 records - was migrated using the same process with minimal additional effort.

CONCLUSIONS

Scripted data entry for immunizations is more accurate than published estimates for manual data entry and we completed our data transfer in 1.2% of the total time we predicted for manual data entry. Performing this process before EMR conversion helped identify obstacles to data migration. Drawing upon this work, we will reuse this process for other healthcare facilities in our health system as they transition to the future EMR.

Impact of universal two-dose vaccination on varicella epidemiology in Navarre, Spain, 2006 to 2012

In 2007 in Navarre, Spain, universal varicella vaccination with two doses of Varivax was introduced in the childhood immunisation schedule for children aged 15 months and three years. This study describes changes in the epidemiology of varicella in the period 2006 to 2012 and evaluates vaccination effectiveness using epidemiological surveillance data. The incidence of varicella in children aged 0 to 14 years decreased by 98.1%, from 50.1 cases per 1,000 inhabitants in 2006, to 1.0 per 1,000 in 2012. Children aged one to eight years were the vaccinated cohorts, and their incidence of varicella decreased by 98.5% (p<0.0001). In unvaccinated age groups, important reductions were also achieved between 2006 and 2012: 90.5% (p<0.0001) in infants under one year of age, and 89.4% (p<0.0001) in children aged nine years. In the period 2006 to 2012, the hospital admissions rate for varicella or its complications decreased by 89.0%, and in 2012, there was only one admission of a newborn with neonatal varicella. Vaccine effectiveness for at least one dose was 96.8% (95% confidence interval: 96.3-97.2%). Universal vaccination with two doses has reduced varicella circulation to minimum levels within five years and has proved highly effective.

Primary versus secondary failure after varicella vaccination: implications for interval between 2 doses

BACKGROUND

Two-dose varicella vaccination is recommended for optimal control of varicella in populations with high (>90%) 1-dose coverage. Optimal timing of the second dose may depend on whether breakthrough varicella results from primary vaccine failure (no protective immunity after vaccination) or secondary vaccine failure (waning protective immunity).

METHODS

Published literature (1995 to 2012) on vaccine failure after varicella vaccination cited in PubMed and other online sources was reviewed.

RESULTS

Nineteen publications detailed 21 varicella outbreaks with breakthrough varicella rates ranging from 0% to 42%; the publications showed no consistent trend between breakthrough varicella rate and time since vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature to date indicates a relatively high rate of primary vaccine failure and limited evidence of secondary vaccine failure among 1-dose varicella vaccine recipients, suggesting that a short interval between 2 doses might be preferable in countries considering implementation of universal varicella vaccination to reduce breakthrough varicella. However, any potential disruption to well-established vaccination schedules should be considered.

Factors associated with receipt of two doses of varicella vaccine among adolescents in the United States

BACKGROUND

In 2006, routine two-dose varicella vaccination for all children was recommended, including a second dose catch-up program for older children and adolescents. Recent studies have shown that a second dose of the vaccine provides incremental protection against varicella disease.

METHODS

This study is a cross-sectional analysis of data collected in the National Immunization Survey-Teen 2010 combined with publicly available data related to state immunization requirements. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine individual-level and state-level factors associated with receipt of two doses of varicella vaccine among 10,542 adolescents 13 to 17 years of age with no history of varicella.

RESULTS

Overall, 58.1% of adolescents without any history of varicella had received two doses of varicella vaccine. Coverage varied widely among states, ranging from 19.7% in South Dakota to 85.3% in Rhode Island. In the multivariable model, receipt of two doses of varicella vaccine was significantly associated with younger age, higher maternal education level, private health insurance, more frequent health care visits, receipt of both quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccinations, and residing in a state with two-dose policies for middle school entry. Vaccines for Children program-eligible adolescents were less likely to have received two doses.

CONCLUSION

Two-dose varicella vaccination coverage remained low among adolescents in 2010, despite the universal recommendation. Programs that are aimed specifically at Vaccines for Children program-eligible adolescents, state policies requiring two doses for middle school entry, and broad education and implementation of the adolescent vaccination platform may help to improve varicella vaccination coverage.

Effectiveness of one and two doses of varicella vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed cases in children in Navarre, Spain

Varicella vaccine effectiveness was evaluated in a case-control study in Navarre, Spain, in 2010-2012. The cases were 54 children aged 15 months to 10 years with a diagnosis of varicella confirmed by polymerase-chain-reaction. Each case was matched with eight controls by pediatric practice, district of residence and date of birth. The effectiveness was 87% (95% confidence interval: 60% to 97%) for one dose of vaccine and 97% (80% to 100%) for two doses. A single dose was 93% (34% to 100%) effective in the first year, which declined to 61% (95% CI: -64% to 94%) after the third year. In conclusion, varicella vaccine is highly effective in preventing confirmed cases, although this effect declines over time since the first dose. A second dose helps to reestablish very high levels of effectiveness and to reduce the risk of breakthrough varicella.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices for diagnosing breakthrough varicella in the outpatient setting

OBJECTIVES

We assessed provider knowledge, attitudes, and practices for the management of breakthrough varicella and identified barriers to implementation of laboratory testing and reporting.

METHODS

We surveyed 145 health-care providers (HCPs) from 30 pediatric practices in Philadelphia who did not have a history of laboratory testing for breakthrough varicella. The self-administered survey instrument collected information on clinicians' practices for management of children presenting with rash, infection-control strategies, reporting to public health agencies, and laboratory testing.

RESULTS

Among the 144 HCPs who completed the survey, 73 (51%) had practiced for more than 10 years. While 115 HCPs (80%) would elect to evaluate a child with rash in the office, only 19 (13%) would submit diagnostics. When patients had a known recent exposure to varicella, 84 HCPs (58%) would use laboratory tests: 40% would use direct fluorescent antibody staining on a specimen from a cutaneous lesion, 24% would use polymerase chain reaction on a lesion specimen, 21% would use acute and convalescent serology, and 10% would use other tests. While waiting for test results, 82 HCPs (57%) would advise that the child be kept at home, 39 (27%) would notify the local health department, and 33 (23%) would inform the school nurse.

CONCLUSION

As varicella becomes increasingly uncommon, laboratory confirmation becomes more critical for appropriate diagnosis, similar to poliomyelitis and measles. Our findings suggest that HCPs need further education regarding laboratory confirmation, containment, and reporting of breakthrough varicella.

Challenges in confirming a varicella outbreak in the two-dose vaccine era

BACKGROUND

A second dose of varicella vaccine was recommended for U.S. children in 2006. We investigated a suspected varicella outbreak in School District X, Texas to determine 2-dose varicella vaccine effectiveness (VE).

METHODS

A varicella case was defined as an illness with maculopapulovesicular rash without other explanation with onset during April 1-June 10, 2011, in a School District X student. We conducted a retrospective cohort in the two schools with the majority of cases. Lesion, saliva, and environmental specimens were collected for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) PCR testing. VE was calculated using historic attack rates among unvaccinated.

RESULTS

In School District X, 82 varicella cases were reported, including 60 from Schools A and B. All cases were mild, with a median of 14 lesions. All 10 clinical specimens and 58 environmental samples tested negative for VZV. Two-dose varicella vaccination coverage was 66.4% in Schools A and B. Varicella VE in affected classrooms was 80.9% (95% CI: 67.2-88.9) among 1-dose vaccinees and 94.7% (95% CI: 89.2-97.4) among 2-dose vaccinees in School A, with a second dose incremental VE of 72.1% (95% CI: 39.0-87.3). Varicella VE among School B students did not differ significantly by dose (80.1% vs. 84.2% among 1-dose and 2-dose vaccinees, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Laboratory testing could not confirm varicella as the etiology of this outbreak; clinical and epidemiologic data suggests varicella as the likely cause. Better diagnostics are needed for diagnosis of varicella in vaccinated individuals so that appropriate outbreak control measures can be implemented.

Update on childhood and adolescent immunizations: selected review of US recommendations and literature: part 2

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a clinically relevant synopsis of research findings regarding childhood and adolescent vaccines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vaccine coverage is relatively static or improving for the vaccines included in the 2010 annual harmonized immunization schedules. Providers should be reviewing patients' immunization records at each visit to take advantage of any opportunity to administer indicated, age-appropriate vaccines. There have been infectious disease outbreaks among highly immunized populations, although unvaccinated or undervaccinated individuals continue to play large roles in the spread of disease. Infants, many of whom are too young to be vaccinated, continue to bear a large disease burden, which underscores the importance of cocooning and, in some cases, vaccination of pregnant women. Influenza, measles, mumps, and rubella, varicella, hepatitis A, meningococcal conjugate, human papillomavirus, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis, and tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccines are reviewed in this second of two articles.

SUMMARY

New research on childhood and adolescent vaccines is anticipated to shape the practice of pediatric providers. Research will continue to provide the science to optimize protection and to promote the health and well being of all children and adolescents.