Species-specific PCR improves detection of bacterial pathogens in parapneumonic empyema compared with 16S PCR and culture

Parapneumonic Empyema Complicating Community-acquired Pneumonia: Etiology in the Era of Pneumococcal Vaccination and Role of Molecular Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) on pneumococcal disease is well described; pneumococcus is infrequently identified by culture in pneumonia. Yield is higher when pleural fluid is cultured. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in pleural fluid samples improves pathogen identification, particularly in the case of S. pneumoniae.

METHODS

Healthy children with empyema who underwent pleural fluid drainage were eligible. Demographics and PCV immunization status were collected. Blood/pleural fluid cultures were obtained. Pleural fluid samples were sent for PCR for pathogen. Serotyping was done by Neufeld-Quellung reaction on pneumococcus isolates, and PCR in culture negative cases.

RESULTS

From December 2018 to September 2023, 74 patients were enrolled. Pathogens were cultured in 22 patients (29.7%), with pneumococcus found in 6 (27.3%). PCR identified additional pathogens in 23 patients (31.1%), including 18 pneumococci (81.8%) and real-time PCR identified 5 more pneumococci, totaling 29 pneumococci, with 23 (79.3%) detected by PCR only. Serotype information was available for 27 (93.1%) pneumococci; 22 (81.5%) were identified as PCV-13 serotypes, with serotype 3 being present in 17 (63%) cases. Among patients with a PCV-13 serotype detected through culture or molecular methods, 15 (68.2%) were fully vaccinated with PCV-13, including 11 of 17 (65%) with serotype 3.

CONCLUSION

S. pneumoniae, particularly serotype 3, is the leading bacterial pathogen in children ≤18 years old. Molecular diagnosis enhances pathogen detection. Ongoing surveillance is crucial to monitor etiology changes as new pneumococcal vaccines are introduced.

Clinical Impact of Pleural Fluid Streptococcus pneumoniae Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing in Children With Complicated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

While Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) is the leading cause of pediatric complicated community-acquired pneumonia (cCAP), it is infrequently recovered by culture-based methods. We studied the real-world clinical impact of an Spn polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for pleural fluid.

METHODS

This pre-post quasi-experimental cohort study compared pathogen detection, antibiotic usage, and outcomes in children hospitalized with cCAP requiring pleural effusion or empyema drainage at Children's Hospital Colorado between 2016 and 2023. Patients were compared across 2 diagnostic periods: pre-Spn PCR and post-Spn PCR. Cox proportional hazard models compared time from admission to pathogen detection, optimal therapy (narrowest pathogen-directed or guideline-recommended empiric therapy), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) therapy discontinuation between periods.

RESULTS

Compared to the pre-Spn PCR cohort (n = 149), the post-Spn PCR cohort (n = 79) was more likely to have a pathogen detected (73.4% post-PCR vs 38.9% pre-PCR, P < .001), driven by more Spn detections (45.6% vs 14.1%, P < .001). Time to pathogen detection during hospitalization was shorter in the post-Spn PCR period (P < .001). The post-PCR cohort was more likely to receive optimal therapy (84.8% vs 53.0%, P < .001), with shorter median times to optimal antibiotics (4.9 vs 10.0 days, P < .001) and MRSA therapy discontinuation (1.5 vs 2.5 days, P = .03). There were no differences in hospital length of stay or readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Spn molecular testing of pleural fluid in children with cCAP resulted in significantly more microbiologic diagnoses and was associated with the optimization of antibiotics and decreased exposure to MRSA therapy, suggesting its clinical impact for pediatric complicated pneumonia.

Evaluation of a multiplex-qPCR for paediatric pleural empyema-An observational study in hospitalised children

Pleural empyema is a serious complication of pneumonia in children. Negative bacterial cultures commonly impede optimal antibiotic therapy. To improve bacterial identification, we developed a molecular assay and evaluated its performance compared with bacterial culture. Our multiplex-quantitative PCR to detect Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae was assessed using bacterial genomic DNA and laboratory-prepared samples (n = 267). To evaluate clinical performance, we conducted the Molecular Assessment of Thoracic Empyema (MATE) observational study, enrolling children hospitalised with empyema. Pleural fluids were tested by bacterial culture and multiplex-qPCR, and performance determined using a study gold standard. We determined clinical sensitivity and time-to-organism-identification to assess the potential of the multiplex-qPCR to reduce the duration of empiric untargeted antibiotic therapy. Using spiked samples, the multiplex-qPCR demonstrated 213/215 (99.1%) sensitivity and 52/52 (100%) specificity for all organisms. During May 2019-March 2023, 100 children were enrolled in the MATE study; median age was 3.9 years (IQR 2-5.6). A bacterial pathogen was identified in 90/100 (90%) specimens by multiplex-qPCR, and 24/100 (24%) by bacterial culture (P <0.001). Multiplex-qPCR identified a bacterial cause in 68/76 (90%) culture-negative specimens. S. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen, identified in 67/100 (67%) specimens. We estimate our multiplex-qPCR would have reduced the duration of untargeted antibiotic therapy in 61% of cases by a median 20 days (IQR 17.5-23, range 1-55). Multiplex-qPCR significantly increased pathogen detection compared with culture and may allow for reducing the duration of untargeted antibiotic therapy.

Clinical relevance of molecular testing methods in the diagnosis and guidance of therapy in patients with staphylococcal empyema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Efficient detection tools for determining staphylococcal pleural infection are critical for its eradication. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic utility of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) in suspected empyema cases to identify staphylococcal strains and avoid unnecessary empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) therapy.

Methods

From inception to July 24, 2021, relevant records were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve for NAAT's diagnostic performance were evaluated using an HSROC model.

Results

Eight studies comprising 424 samples evaluated NAAT accuracy for Staphylococcus aureus (SA) identification, while four studies comprising 317 samples evaluated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identification. The pooled NAAT summary estimates for detection of both SA (sensitivity: 0.35 (95% CI 0.19-0.55), specificity: 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97), PLR: 7.92 (95% CI 4.98-12.59), NLR: 0.44 (95% CI 0.14-1.46), and DOR: 24.0 (95% CI 6.59-87.61) ) and MRSA (sensitivity: 0.45 (95% CI 0.15-0.78), specificity: 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.95), PLR: 10.06 (95% CI 1.49-67.69), NLR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-1.15), and DOR: 27.18 (95% CI 2.97-248.6) ) were comparable. The I2 statistical scores for MRSA and SA identification sensitivity were 13.7% and 74.9%, respectively, indicating mild to substantial heterogeneity. PCR was frequently used among NAA tests, and its diagnostic accuracy coincided well with the overall summary estimates. A meta-regression and subgroup analysis of country, setting, study design, patient selection, and sample condition could not explain the heterogeneity (meta-regression P = 0.66, P = 0.46, P = 0.98, P = 0.68, and P = 0.79, respectively) in diagnostic effectiveness.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of NAA tests is currently inadequate to substitute culture as a principal screening test. NAAT could be used in conjunction with microbiological culture due to the advantage of faster results and in situations where culture tests are not doable.

[Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Children and Adolescents (Pediatric Community Acquired Pneumonia, pCAP) - Issued under the Responsibility of the German Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases (DGPI) and the German Society for Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP)]

The present guideline aims to improve the evidence-based management of children and adolescents with pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (pCAP). Despite a prevalence of approx. 300 cases per 100 000 children per year in Central Europe, mortality is very low. Prevention includes infection control measures and comprehensive immunization. The diagnosis can and should be established clinically by history, physical examination and pulse oximetry, with fever and tachypnea as cardinal features. Additional signs or symptoms such as severely compromised general condition, poor feeding, dehydration, altered consciousness or seizures discriminate subjects with severe pCAP from those with non-severe pCAP. Within an age-dependent spectrum of infectious agents, bacterial etiology cannot be reliably differentiated from viral or mixed infections by currently available biomarkers. Most children and adolescents with non-severe pCAP and oxygen saturation > 92 % can be managed as outpatients without laboratory/microbiology workup or imaging. Anti-infective agents are not generally indicated and can be safely withheld especially in children of young age, with wheeze or other indices suggesting a viral origin. For calculated antibiotic therapy, aminopenicillins are the preferred drug class with comparable efficacy of oral (amoxicillin) and intravenous administration (ampicillin). Follow-up evaluation after 48 - 72 hours is mandatory for the assessment of clinical course, treatment success and potential complications such as parapneumonic pleural effusion or empyema, which may necessitate alternative or add-on therapy.

International survey of paediatric infectious diseases consultants on the management of community-acquired pneumonia complicated by pleural empyema

AIM

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) complicated by pleural empyema is an important paediatric problem. Antibiotic management decisions are made on the basis of little available data and without strong specific recommendations in guidelines.

METHODS

This was an online survey of paediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians disseminated by major international professional organisations, examining empiric and targeted antibiotic choice, switch to oral antibiotics and duration of treatment for two hypothetical cases of contrasting severity.

RESULTS

This study included 183 responses, mostly from North America, Western Europe and Australia/New Zealand. Increased disease severity was significantly associated with broader-spectrum and combination empiric and targeted antibiotic treatment, empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage and both longer intravenous (IV) and total duration of antibiotic treatment. Empirical MRSA coverage was also associated with local prevalence. Clinical progress was most important for determining the timing of the switch from IV to oral antibiotics. Few respondents chose antibiotics with activity against organisms associated with atypical pneumonia (e.g. Mycoplasma, Chlamydia), and most did not choose agents that inhibit protein synthesis (e.g. clindamycin), even in the case of a severe invasive group A streptococcal infection. Some variation in targeted treatment choices reflected areas of uncertainty, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptibility breakpoints, comparative effectiveness of anti-staphylococcal penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins for serious S. aureus infections and linezolid and vancomycin for MRSA pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

This international survey of PID physicians highlights the priority targets for clinical research to improve antibiotic treatment of CAP complicated by empyema. Interventions that might be studied include empirical antibiotic guidelines stratified by case severity, adjunctive empirical use of agents that inhibit protein synthesis (e.g. clindamycin) and approaches to encourage rapid IV-to-oral switch and shorter total antibiotic treatment.

The use of broad-range bacterial PCR in the diagnosis of infectious diseases: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Broad-range PCR has the potential to detect virtually any bacterial species via amplification and nucleotide sequencing of a DNA region common to all bacteria. We aimed to evaluate its usefulness and clinical relevance when applied to a wide variety of primary sterile materials.

METHODS

A prospective study including 1370 samples (75 heart valves, 151 joint tissue samples, 230 joint aspirates, 848 whole blood samples and 66 culture-negative cerebrospinal fluid samples) were studied by using a commercial PCR system for detecting 16S rDNA (Molzym). The PCR results were compared with culture and were considered to provide added diagnostic value only if the PCR approach revealed new pathogens that were missed by culture.

RESULTS

The added value of PCR was evident in 173 of 555 PCR-positive samples (0.126; 0.109-0.144 (proportion from all tested samples; 95% confidence interval)), most frequently in examinations of heart valves (0.56; 0.448-0.672) and joint tissue samples (0.219; 0.153-0.284). In contrast, the lowest rate of PCR with added value was noted for blood samples, regardless of the patient cohort they had been drawn from (nononcologic patients from intensive care: 0.065; 0.043-0.087, haematooncologic children: 0.048; 0.027-0.070). Moreover, PCR missed up to 7.1% of blood culture findings (0.071; 0.048-0.095) regarded as clinically relevant, which was the second highest failure rate after joint tissue samples (0.099; 0.052-0.147).

CONCLUSIONS

Broad-range PCR substantially increases detection rate of pathogens, especially from heart valves and joint samples. However, a concurrent risk of false-negative PCR results justifies the need for parallel culture.

Determining the microbiological cause of a chest infection

Over recent years non-culture techniques such as specific viral and bacterial nucleic acid amplification, serology and antigen detection have considerably developed and been applied within research studies to clinical samples, significantly increasing pathogen detection in pneumonia. There are promising signs of improved diagnostic yields for pneumococcal pneumonia when using molecular techniques to detect pneumococcal gene sequences in blood or by combining serum biomarkers with rapid pneumococcal urinary antigen testing. Pathogens have traditionally been difficult to detect in pneumonia and treatment is usually successful with empiric antibiotics. However, directed antibiotic treatment has significant benefits in terms of antibiotic stewardship and these new technologies make this goal a possibility, though not yet a reality.