1
|
Vambheim SM, Hjellvik V, Odsbu I, Skurtveit S, Ekholdt C, Granan LP, Stubhaug A, Samuelsen PJ. Postoperative opioid use in Norway-a population-based observational study on patterns of long-term use. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 25:81. [PMID: 39456108 PMCID: PMC11515196 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-024-00805-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization patterns of opioid analgesics and the proportion of long-term opioid use after surgery in Norway is largely unknown. METHODS This study aimed to estimate the proportion of one-year long-term prescription opioid use among all Norwegian postoperative opioid users. Complete data from central health registries (NPR, NorPD, Statistics Norway, CoDR) were linked via the personal identification number unique to all citizens. The study period was January 1st 2010 until December 31st 2019. Long-term opioid use was defined as at least two opioid dispensings within two subsequent 90-day periods, with a minimum average use of 10 MME/day for the first 90 days. RESULTS The study population consisted of 693 495 post-operative opioid users (53.6% women), whereof 73.2% had not used opioids the year before surgery (new users). Among the postoperative opioid users, 3.8% were one-year long-term opioid users. The corresponding figures for new and previous opioid users were 0.4% and 13.1%, respectively. The highest proportions of long-term opioid use were found after transluminal endoscopy, eye surgery and assessments related to surgical procedures. In previous opioid users, the proportion of one-year long-term use was higher among women than men in all age groups, a difference that increased with age. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of postoperative long-term opioid use in Norway is generally low. We detected higher proportions of long-term opioid use after certain types of surgery, but our crude surgery definition warrants further examination. Previous opioid users pose a particular challenge in the management of postoperative pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study used national health registry data from the period 2010-2019. A pre-registered analysis plan is available at Open Science Framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Magelssen Vambheim
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Vidar Hjellvik
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingvild Odsbu
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svetlana Skurtveit
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christopher Ekholdt
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Petter Granan
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Audun Stubhaug
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per-Jostein Samuelsen
- Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ebata N, Sakai T, Yamamoto H, Toyoda T, Togo K, Deie M. Use of analgesics before and after total joint replacement in working-age Japanese patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis: A retrospective database study. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 2024; 35:1-8. [PMID: 38025403 PMCID: PMC10659993 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patterns of analgesic use before and after total joint replacement (TJR) in patients with knee/hip osteoarthritis (OA) is not well reported. Methods This retrospective longitudinal analysis used JMDC claims data of patients who underwent knee/hip replacement surgery from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcome was proportion of patients using analgesics pre-surgery, immediately post-surgery, and in post-surgery period. Factors affecting post-surgery analgesic withdrawal and opioid prescriptions were assessed using logistic regression. Results Of all (N = 3168) patients, those with knee OA (91.1 %) and hip OA (82.5 %) used analgesics pre-surgery, and 96.1 % with knee OA and 84.9 % with hip OA required analgesics even 3 months post-surgery. NSAIDs were most commonly used pre- and post-surgery in both OA groups. Before surgery, 15.6 % (knee OA) and 13.7 % of patients (hip OA) used weak opioids, and 23.1 % (knee OA) and 10.5 % (hip OA) of patients continued them post-surgery. Strong opioid use was noted in 2.2 % and 1.2 % of patients pre-surgery, and 5.8 % and 3.4 % of patients post-surgery in the knee and hip OA groups, respectively. Using pre-operative oral NSAIDs (odds ratio [OR]:0.56; 95 % confidence interval [CI]:0.44-0.72) and weak opioids (OR:0.58; 95 % CI:0.38-0.87) associated with withdrawal of post-surgery analgesics in patients with hip OA, and using intra-articular hyaluronic acid pre-surgery (OR:0.45; 95 % CI:0.21-0.97) was significant in patients with knee OA. Using weak (OR:4.59; 95 % CI:3.44-6.13) and strong opioids (OR:2.48; 95 % CI:1.01-6.07) pre-surgery associated with post-operative opioid use in patients with hip OA, and weak opioid use was significant in patients with knee OA (OR:7.00; 95 % CI:4.65-10.54). Conclusion This study reported difference in analgesic use before and after TJR, and that many patients required analgesics even 3 months after TJR surgery in Japan. Pre-operative analgesic use associated with continued use after surgery. Optimal pain management before and immediately after TJR is important to reduce post-operative analgesic use, especially opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nozomi Ebata
- Pfizer Japan Inc., 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Takashi Sakai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Pfizer Japan Inc., 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Tetsumi Toyoda
- Clinical Study Support, Inc., 1-11-20 Nishiki, Naka-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 460-0003, Japan
| | - Kanae Togo
- Pfizer Japan Inc., 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Masataka Deie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazago-Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Brug HE, Nelissen RGHH, Rosendaal FR, van Steenbergen LN, van Dorp ELA, Bouvy ML, Dahan A, Gademan MGJ. Out-of-hospital opioid prescriptions after knee and hip arthroplasty: prescribers and the first prescribed opioid. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:459-467. [PMID: 36858887 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We determined the first prescribed opioid and the prescribers of opioids after knee and hip arthroplasty (KA/HA) between 2013 and 2018 in the Netherlands. We also evaluated whether the first prescribed opioid dose was associated with the total dispensed dose and long-term opioid use in the first postoperative year. METHODS The Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics was linked to the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Stratified for KA/HA, the first out-of-hospital opioid within 30 days of operation was quantified as median morphine milligram equivalent (MME). Opioid prescribers were orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rheumatologists, anaesthesiologists, and other physicians. Long-term use was defined as ≥1 opioid prescription for >90 postoperative days. We used linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders. RESULTS Seventy percent of 46 106 KAs and 51% of the 42 893 HAs were prescribed ≥1 opioid. Oxycodone increased as first prescribed opioid (from 44% to 85%) whereas tramadol decreased (64-11%), but their dosage remained stable (stronger opioids were preferred by prescribers). An increase in the first prescription of 1% MME resulted in a 0.43%/0.37% increase in total MME (KA/HA, respectively). A 100 MME increase in dose of the first dispensed opioid had a small effect on long-term use (prevalence: 25% KA, 20% HA) (odds ratio=1.02/1.01 for KA/HA, respectively). Orthopaedic surgeons increasingly prescribed the first prescription between 2013 and 2018 (44-69%). General practitioners mostly prescribed consecutive prescriptions (>50%). CONCLUSION Oxycodone increased as first out-of-hospital prescription between 2013 and 2018. The dose of the first prescribed opioid was associated with the total dose and a small increased risk of prolonged use. First prescriptions were mostly written by orthopaedic surgeons and consecutive prescriptions by general practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather E van Brug
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Frits R Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eveline L A van Dorp
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel L Bouvy
- Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klenø AN, Sørensen HT, Pedersen AB. Time trends in use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids one year after total hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis during 1996-2018: a population-based cohort study of 103,209 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:1376-1384. [PMID: 35918050 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine time trends in the use of NSAIDs and opioids for patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) during 1996-2018. METHOD Using Danish population-based medical databases, we identified 103,209 THA patients. Prevalence rates of NSAID and opioid use among preoperative users and non-users were calculated in four quarters (Q1-Q4) after THA by calendar periods (1996-2000, 2001-2006, 2007-2012 and 2013-2018). Prevalence rate ratios (PRR) were adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS Among preoperative NSAID users and non-users, NSAID use in Q1 increased from 32.6% in 1996-2000 to 48.0% in 2013-2018 (PRR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.42-1.55) and from 12.9% to 32.0% (PRR = 2.49 (2.32-2.67)), respectively. Among preoperative opioid users and non-users, opioid use in Q1 increased from 42.7% in 1996-2000 to 76.9% in 2013-2018 (PRR = 1.81 (1.73-1.89)) and from 15.2% to 58.2% (PRR = 3.85 (3.65-4.05)), respectively. NSAID use in Q4 decreased from 24.5% in 1996-2000 to 21.4% in 2013-2018 (PRR = 0.88 (0.83-0.93)) and from 6.9% to 5.6% (PRR = 0.81 (0.73-0.91)) in preoperative NSAIDs users and non-users, respectively. Opioid use in Q4 increased from 26.6% in 1996-2000 to 28.6% (PRR = 1.08 (1.02-1.15)) in 2013-2018 and from 4.1% to 5.0% (PRR = 1.25 (1.11-1.40)) in preoperative opioid users and non-users, respectively. CONCLUSION We observed up to a 4-fold increase in NSAID and opioid use in Q1 during 1996-2018, while usage in Q4 did not change substantially. However, 5-6% of the preoperative non-users of NSAIDs and opioids were users in Q4, which might relate to inaccurate indication for or timing of THA and the post-surgical phasing out of analgesics use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Klenø
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Århus N, Denmark.
| | - H T Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Århus N, Denmark.
| | - A B Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Århus N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang P, Brownrigg J, Roe J, Carmody D, Pinczewski L, Gooden B, Lyons M, Salmon L, Martina K, Crighton J, O'Sullivan M. Opioid use and patient outcomes in an Australian hip and knee arthroplasty cohort. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2261-2268. [PMID: 36097420 PMCID: PMC9543592 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background To determine the prevalence of opioid use in Australian hip (THA) or knee (TKA) cohort, and its association with outcomes. Methods About 837 primary THA or TKA subjects prospectively completed Oxford Scores, and Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score(KOOS/HOOS) and opioid use in the previous week before arthroplasty. Subjects repeated the baseline survey at 6 months, with additional questions regarding satisfaction. Results Opioid use was reported by 19% preoperatively and 7% at 6 months. Opioid use was 46% at 6 weeks and 10% at 6 months after TKR, and 16% at 6 weeks and 4% at 6 months after THR. Preoperative opioid use was associated with back pain(OR 2.2, P = 0.006), anxiety or depression(OR 1.8, P = 0.001) and Oxford knee scores <30(OR 5.6, P = 0.021) in TKA subjects, and females in THA subjects(OR 1.7, P = 0.04). There was no difference between preoperative opioid users and non‐users for satisfaction, or KOOS or HOOS scores at 6 months. 77% of patients taking opioids before surgery had ceased by 6 months, and 3% of preoperative non users reported opioid use at 6 months. Opioid use at 6 months was associated with preoperative use (OR 6.6–14.7, P < 0.001), and lower 6 month oxford scores (OR 4.4–83.6, P < 0.01). Conclusion One in five used opioids before arthroplasty. Pre‐operative opioid use was the strongest risk factor for opioid use at 6 months, increasing odds 7–15 times. Prolonged opioid use was rarely observed in the opioid naïve (<5% TKA and 1% THA). Preoperative opioid use was not associated with inferior outcomes or satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phil Huang
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Orthopaedic Services The Mater Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Jack Brownrigg
- School of Medicine University of Notre Dame Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Justin Roe
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - David Carmody
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Leo Pinczewski
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine University of Notre Dame Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Benjamin Gooden
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Matthew Lyons
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Lucy Salmon
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine University of Notre Dame Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Ka Martina
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Orthopaedic Services The Mater Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Joanna Crighton
- Orthopaedic Services The Mater Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Michael O'Sullivan
- North Sydney Orthopaedic Research Group Sydney New South Wales Australia
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mohammad HR, Gooberman-Hill R, Delmestri A, Broomfield J, Patel R, Huber J, Garriga C, Eccleston C, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Malak TT, Arden N, Price A, Wylde V, Peters TJ, Blom AW, Judge A. Risk factors associated with poor pain outcomes following primary knee replacement surgery: Analysis of data from the clinical practice research datalink, hospital episode statistics and patient reported outcomes as part of the STAR research programme. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0261850. [PMID: 34972159 PMCID: PMC8719727 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify risk factors for poor pain outcomes six months after primary knee replacement surgery. METHODS Observational cohort study on patients receiving primary knee replacement from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episode Statistics and Patient Reported Outcomes. A wide range of variables routinely collected in primary and secondary care were identified as potential predictors of worsening or only minor improvement in pain, based on the Oxford Knee Score pain subscale. Results are presented as relative risk ratios and adjusted risk differences (ARD) by fitting a generalized linear model with a binomial error structure and log link function. RESULTS Information was available for 4,750 patients from 2009 to 2016, with a mean age of 69, of whom 56.1% were female. 10.4% of patients had poor pain outcomes. The strongest effects were seen for pre-operative factors: mild knee pain symptoms at the time of surgery (ARD 18.2% (95% Confidence Interval 13.6, 22.8), smoking 12.0% (95% CI:7.3, 16.6), living in the most deprived areas 5.6% (95% CI:2.3, 9.0) and obesity class II 6.3% (95% CI:3.0, 9.7). Important risk factors with more moderate effects included a history of previous knee arthroscopy surgery 4.6% (95% CI:2.5, 6.6), and use of opioids 3.4% (95% CI:1.4, 5.3) within three months after surgery. Those patients with worsening pain state change had more complications by 3 months (11.8% among those in a worse pain state vs. 2.7% with the same pain state). CONCLUSIONS We quantified the relative importance of individual risk factors including mild pre-operative pain, smoking, deprivation, obesity and opioid use in terms of the absolute proportions of patients achieving poor pain outcomes. These findings will support development of interventions to reduce the numbers of patients who have poor pain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Raza Mohammad
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Gooberman-Hill
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Antonella Delmestri
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - John Broomfield
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rita Patel
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Joerg Huber
- Department of Orthopedics, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cesar Garriga
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Department for Health, Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tamer T. Malak
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Arden
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Price
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vikki Wylde
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tim J. Peters
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley W. Blom
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Judge
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rajamäki TJ, Moilanen T, Puolakka PA, Hietaharju A, Jämsen E. Is the Preoperative Use of Antidepressants and Benzodiazepines Associated with Opioid and Other Analgesic Use After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:2268-2280. [PMID: 33982976 PMCID: PMC8445559 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health disorders can occur in patients with pain conditions, and there have been reports of an increased risk of persistent pain after THA and TKA among patients who have psychological distress. Persistent pain may result in the prolonged consumption of opioids and other analgesics, which may expose patients to adverse drug events and narcotic habituation or addiction. However, the degree to which preoperative use of antidepressants or benzodiazepines is associated with prolonged analgesic use after surgery is not well quantified. QUESTION/PURPOSES (1) Is the preoperative use of antidepressants or benzodiazepine medications associated with a greater postoperative use of opioids, NSAIDs, or acetaminophen? (2) Is the proportion of patients still using opioid analgesics 1 year after arthroplasty higher among patients who were taking antidepressants or benzodiazepine medications before surgery, after controlling for relevant confounding variables? (3) Does analgesic drug use decrease after surgery in patients with a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use? (4) Does the proportion of patients using antidepressants or benzodiazepines change after joint arthroplasty compared with before? METHODS Of the 10,138 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and the 9930 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty at Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland, between 2002 and 2013, those who had primary joint arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis (64% [6502 of 10,138] of patients with hip surgery and 82% [8099 of 9930] who had knee surgery) were considered potentially eligible. After exclusion of another 8% (845 of 10,138) and 13% (1308 of 9930) of patients because they had revision or another joint arthroplasty within 2 years of the index surgery, 56% (5657 of 10,138) of patients with hip arthroplasty and 68% (6791 of 9930) of patients with knee arthroplasty were included in this retrospective registry study. Patients who filled prescriptions for antidepressants or benzodiazepines were identified from a nationwide drug prescription register, and information on the filled prescriptions for opioids (mild and strong), NSAIDs, and acetaminophen were extracted from the same database. For the analyses, subgroups were created according to the status of benzodiazepine and antidepressant use during the 6 months before surgery. First, the proportions of patients who used opioids and any analgesics (that is, opioids, NSAIDs, or acetaminophen) were calculated. Then, multivariable logistic regression adjusted with age, gender, joint, Charlson Comorbidity Index, BMI, laterality (unilateral/same-day bilateral), and preoperative analgesic use was performed to calculate odds ratios for any analgesic use and opioid use 1 year postoperatively. Additionally, the proportion of patients who used antidepressants and benzodiazepines was calculated for 2 years before and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS At 1 year postoperatively, patients with a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use were more likely to fill prescriptions for any analgesics than were patients without a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use (adjusted odds ratios 1.9 [95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.2]; p < 0.001 and 1.8 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.0]; p < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, patients with a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use were more likely to fill prescriptions for opioids than patients without a history of antidepressant or benzodiazepine use (adjusted ORs 2.1 [95% CI 1.7 to 2.7]; p < 0.001 and 2.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.4]; p < 0.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the proportion of patients who filled any analgesic prescription was smaller 1 year after surgery than preoperatively in patients with a history of antidepressant (42% [439 of 1038] versus 55% [568 of 1038]; p < 0.001) and/or benzodiazepine use (40% [801 of 2008] versus 55% [1098 of 2008]; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients who used antidepressants and/or benzodiazepines was essentially stable during the observation period. CONCLUSION Surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of prolonged opioid and other analgesic use after surgery among patients who were on preoperative antidepressant and/or benzodiazepine therapy, and they should have candid discussions with patients referred for elective joint arthroplasty about this possibility. Further studies are needed to identify the most effective methods to reduce prolonged postoperative opioid use among these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuomas J Rajamäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Pia A Puolakka
- Department of Anaesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Aki Hietaharju
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Esa Jämsen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, postoperative opioid prescriptions have been implicated in the so-called 'opioid epidemic'. In Europe, the extent of overprescribing or misuse of opioids is not known. OBJECTIVES To describe the proportion of persistent postoperative opioid use in adults (>18 years) in European countries. DESIGN Systematic review of the published data. DATA SOURCES We searched the electronic literature databases MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies describing opioid use in adult patients (>18 years) at least 3 months after surgery. RESULTS One thousand three hundred and seven studies were found, and 12 studies were included in this review. The rate of opioid use after 3 to 6 months was extracted from the studies and categorised by the type of surgery. Nine studies investigated opioid use after total hip or total knee arthroplasties (THA and TKA) and reported opioid user rates between 7.9 and 41% after 3 months. In all the included studies, a proportion between 2 and 41% of patients were opioid users 3 months after surgery. The level of evidence varied from high to very low. CONCLUSION To describe persistent opioid use in relation to specific countries or types of surgery is not possible. Because of the wide ranges observed, we can neither confirm nor rule out a possible public health problem linked to the persistent use of opioids in Europe. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42019154292.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taalke Sitter
- From the Epidemiology group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen (TS, PF) and Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK (PF)
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kooner S, Kubik J, Mahdavi S, Piroozfar SG, Khong H, Mohan K, Batuyong E, Sharma R. Do psychiatric disorders affect patient reported outcomes and clinical outcomes post total hip and knee arthroplasty? SAGE Open Med 2021; 9:20503121211012254. [PMID: 33996082 PMCID: PMC8107666 DOI: 10.1177/20503121211012254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of major psychiatric illness on patient outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of a major psychiatric disorder undergoing total joint arthroplasty were retrospectively matched one-to-one with a cohort without such a diagnosis. Major psychiatric disorder in the registry was identified by diagnosis of anxiety, mood, or a psychotic disorder. Primary outcome of interest included perioperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes included EuroQol-5D, adverse events, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and discharge destination. Results: Total number of patients were 1828. The total hip arthroplasty (37.80 ± 17.91, p = 0.023) and the total knee arthroplasty psychiatric group (43.38 ± 18.41, p = 0.050) had significantly lower pre-operative WOMAC scores. At 3 months, the total hip arthroplasty (76.74 ± 16.94, p = 0.036) and total knee arthroplasty psychiatric group (71.09 ± 18.64, p < 0.01) again had significantly lower 3-month post-operative WOMAC score compared to the control groups. However, outcomes at 1 year were difficult to interpret, as patients with major psychiatric conditions had an extremely high loss to follow-up. Compared to the control groups, the total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty psychiatric group had an increased length of stay by 1.43 days (p < 0.01) and 0.77 days, respectively (p = 0.05). Similarly, the psychiatric groups were discharged directly home less often (total hip arthroplasty 86.9%, p = 0.024 and total knee arthroplasty 87.6%, p = 0.022) than the control groups. Conclusion: Patients with the diagnosis of a major psychiatric illness have an increased length of stay and are more likely to require a rehabilitation facility, compared to the control groups. Arguably, of utmost importance, there is a very high rate of loss to follow-up within the psychiatric groups. As such, we recommend these patients should be treated for their diagnosis prior to total joint arthroplasty. Furthermore, importance of clinical follow-up should be emphasized carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Kooner
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jeremy Kubik
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Saboura Mahdavi
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sophie Ghashang Piroozfar
- Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hoa Khong
- Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kanwal Mohan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Rajrishi Sharma
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thurin E, Rydén I, Skoglund T, Smits A, Gulati S, Hesselager G, Bartek J, Henriksson R, Salvesen Ø, Jakola AS. Impact of meningioma surgery on use of antiepileptic, antidepressant, and sedative drugs: A Swedish nationwide matched cohort study. Cancer Med 2021; 10:2967-2977. [PMID: 33773085 PMCID: PMC8085957 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor and surgery is the main treatment modality. As death from lack of tumor control is rare, other outcome measures like anxiety, depression and post‐operative epilepsy are becoming increasingly relevant. In this nationwide registry‐based study we aimed to describe the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED), antidepressants and sedatives before and after surgical treatment of an intracranial meningioma compared to a control population, and to provide predictors for continued use of each drug‐group two years after surgery. Methods All adult patients with histopathologically verified intracranial meningiomas were identified in the Swedish Brain Tumor Registry and their data were linked to relevant national registries after assigning five matched controls to each patient. We analyzed the prescription patterns of antiepileptic drugs (AED), antidepressants and sedative drugs in the two years before and the two years following surgery. Results For the 2070 patients and 10312 controls identified the use of AED, antidepressants and sedatives was comparable two years before surgery. AED use at time of surgery was higher for patients than for controls (22.2% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01), as was antidepressant use (12.9% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.01). Both AED and antidepressant use remained elevated after surgery, with patients having a higher AED use (19.7% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.01) and antidepressant use (14.8% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.01) at 2 years post‐surgery. Use of sedatives peaked for patients at the time of surgery (14.4% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.01) and remained elevated at two years after surgery with 9.9% versus 6.6% (p < 0.01). For all the studied drugs, previous drug use was the strongest predictor for use 2 years after surgery. Conclusion This nationwide study shows that increased use of AED, antidepressants and sedatives in patients with meningioma started perioperatively, and remained elevated two years following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Thurin
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Isabelle Rydén
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Skoglund
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anja Smits
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sasha Gulati
- Department of Neurosurgery, St.Olavs University Hospital HF, Trondheim, Norway.,Institute of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Göran Hesselager
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roger Henriksson
- Department of Radiation Sciences & Oncology, University of Umeå, Umea, Sweden
| | - Øyvind Salvesen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Asgeir S Jakola
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, St.Olavs University Hospital HF, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Miura T, Kijima H, Konishi N, Kubota H, Yamada S, Tazawa H, Tani T, Suzuki N, Kamo K, Fujii M, Sasaki K, Kawano T, Iwamoto Y, Nagahata I, Miyakoshi N, Shimada Y. Preoperative medications is one of the factor affecting patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop 2020; 23:78-82. [PMID: 33424189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the reported clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip osteoarthritis are satisfactory, not all patients are completely satisfied. Thus, there is interest in predicting postoperative satisfaction before surgery. The influence of comorbidities and preoperative medications on the incidence of complications and duration of hospitalization following THA has become apparent. However, studies about the associations of preoperative medication with clinical outcomes of THA are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between preoperative medications and postoperative patient-reported outcomes. This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study enrolled post-THA patients (79 patients, 90 hips) who were examined from February to March 2019 in eight general hospitals. Outcome measures included patient-reported outcome as Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) score. Preoperative medications were investigated from medical records. Medications were categorized, and analgesics were categorized into non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, pregabalin, duloxetine, neurotropin (an extract from inflammatory rabbit skin inoculated by vaccinia virus), and opioid. To identify the factors associated with JHEQ score, the patients were divided into lower (<55 score) and higher (≥55) JHEQ score groups. Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) showed significant difference between the total number of preoperative medications and postoperative JHEQ movement subscale (r = -0.37, p < 0.01), mental subscale (r = -0.29, p < 0.01), and JHEQ (r = -0.30, p < 0.01) scores. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, only the total number of preoperative medications was identified as a risk factor for lower JHEQ score (p < 0.01). This study clarified an inverse correlation between the total preoperative medication count and postoperative outcomes and found that larger total count of preoperative medications is a risk factor of poor postoperative patient-reported outcomes of THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takanori Miura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kakunodate General Hospital, 3 Iwase, Kakunodate, Senboku, Akita, 014-0394, Japan.,Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kijima
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.,Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Natsuo Konishi
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Kubota
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Shin Yamada
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tazawa
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Takayuki Tani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kakunodate General Hospital, 3 Iwase, Kakunodate, Senboku, Akita, 014-0394, Japan.,Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Norio Suzuki
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Keiji Kamo
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Masashi Fujii
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.,Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Ken Sasaki
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Kawano
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.,Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Yosuke Iwamoto
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Itsuki Nagahata
- Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Naohisa Miyakoshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Yoichi Shimada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.,Akita Hip Research Group (AHRG), 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajamäki TJ, Puolakka PA, Hietaharju A, Moilanen T, Jämsen E. Predictors of the use of analgesic drugs 1 year after joint replacement: a single-center analysis of 13,000 hip and knee replacements. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:89. [PMID: 32317021 PMCID: PMC7175525 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02184-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain persists in a moderate number of patients following hip or knee replacement surgery. Persistent pain may subsequently lead to the prolonged consumption of analgesics after surgery and expose patients to the adverse drug events of opioids and NSAIDs, especially in older patients and patients with comorbidities. This study aimed to identify risk factors for the increased use of opioids and other analgesics 1 year after surgery and focused on comorbidities and surgery-related factors. METHODS All patients who underwent a primary hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis from 2002 to 2013 were identified. Redeemed prescriptions for acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids (mild and strong) were collected from a nationwide Drug Prescription Register. The user rates of analgesics and the adjusted risks ratios for analgesic use 1 year after joint replacement were calculated. RESULTS Of the 6238 hip replacement and 7501 knee replacement recipients, 3591 (26.1%) were still using analgesics 1 year after surgery. Significant predictors of overall analgesic use (acetaminophen, NSAID, or opioid) were (risk ratio (95% CI)) age 65-74.9 years (reference < 65), 1.1 (1.03-1.2); age > 75 years, 1.2 (1.1-1.3); female gender, 1.2 (1.1-1.3); BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2 (reference < 25 kg/m2), 1.1 (1.04-1.2); BMI > 35 kg/m2, 1.4 (1.3-1.6); and a higher number of comorbidities (according to the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index score), 1.2 (1.1-1.4). Diabetes and other comorbidities were not significant independent predictors. Of the other clinical factors, the preoperative use of analgesics, 2.6 (2.5-2.8), and knee surgery, 1.2 (1.1-1.3), predicted the use of analgesics, whereas simultaneous bilateral knee replacement (compared to unilateral procedure) was a protective factor, 0.86 (0.77-0.96). Opioid use was associated with obesity, higher CCI score, epilepsy, knee vs hip surgery, unilateral vs bilateral knee operation, total vs unicompartmental knee replacement, and the preoperative use of analgesics/opioids. CONCLUSIONS Obesity (especially BMI > 35 kg/m2) and the preoperative use of analgesics were the strongest predictors of an increased postoperative use of analgesics. It is remarkable that also older age and higher number of comorbidities predicted analgesic use despite these patients being the most vulnerable to adverse drug events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pia A Puolakka
- Department of Anaesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Aki Hietaharju
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Esa Jämsen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014, Tampere, Finland
- Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rajamäki TJ, Puolakka PA, Hietaharju A, Moilanen T, Jämsen E. Use of prescription analgesic drugs before and after hip or knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:427. [PMID: 31521139 PMCID: PMC6745067 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2809-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analgesic drugs are recommended to treat pain caused by osteoarthritis, and joint replacement should decrease the need for them. We aimed to determine the user rates of analgesic drugs before and after joint replacement. METHODS All patients who underwent a primary hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis from 2002 to 2013 in a region of 0.5 million people were identified. Patients with revision or other joint replacements during the study period (operation date +/- two years) were excluded, leaving 6238 hip replacements (5657 patients) and 7501 knee replacements (6791 patients) for analyses. Medication data were collected from a nationwide Drug Prescription Register and the prevalence (with its 95% confidence intervals) of acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mild opioids, strong opioids, and medications used for neuropathic pain was calculated in three-month periods two years before and after surgery. RESULTS Between two years and three months preoperatively, the proportion of patients who redeemed at least one type of analgesic drug increased from 28% (95% CI, 27-30%) to 48% (47-50%) on hip replacement patients and from 33% (32-34%) to 41% (40-42%) on knee replacement patients. Postoperatively, the proportions decreased to 23% (22-24%) on hip and to 30% (29-31%) on knee patients. Hip replacement patients used more NSAIDs (34% (32-35%) hip vs 26% (25-27%) knee, p < 0.001), acetaminophen (14% (13-15%) vs 12% (11-13%), p < 0.001), and mild opioids (14% (13-15%) vs 9% (8-9%), p < 0.001) than knee patients preoperatively, but postoperatively hip patients used less NSAIDs (12% (11-13%) vs 16% (15-16%), p < 0.001), acetaminophen (9% (8-10%) vs 11% (11-12%), p < 0.001), and mild opioids (5% (5-6%) vs 8% (7-8%), p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Use of analgesic drugs increases prior to joint replacement, and is reduced following surgery. However, a considerable proportion of patients continue to use analgesics in two-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuomas J Rajamäki
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Pia A Puolakka
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Anaesthesia, Tampere University Hospital, PO box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
| | - Aki Hietaharju
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, PO box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere, Finland
| | - Teemu Moilanen
- Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement, PO box 652, FI-33101, Tampere, Finland
| | - Esa Jämsen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland.,Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement, PO box 652, FI-33101, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jørgensen CC, Petersen M, Kehlet H, Aasvang EK. Analgesic consumption trajectories in 8975 patients 1 year after fast-track total hip or knee arthroplasty. Eur J Pain 2018; 22:1428-1438. [PMID: 29676839 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent or increased long-term opioid consumption has previously been described following total hip- (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, detailed information on postoperative analgesic consumption trajectories and risk factors associated with continued need of analgesics in fast-track THA and TKA is sparse. METHODS This is a descriptive multicentre study in primary unilateral fast-track THA or TKA with prospective data on patient characteristics and information on reimbursement entitled dispensed prescriptions of paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, anticonvulsants and antidepressants 1 month preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were stratified according to preoperative opioid use. Postoperative analgesic consumption trajectories were stratified as increased, decreased or no use compared to the preoperative period. RESULTS Of 8975 patients (4849 THA/4126 TKA), 33.9% had relevant reimbursed prescriptions 9-12 months postoperatively. Of 2136 (23.8%) patients with preoperative opioid use, 3.4% had unchanged opioid consumption at 9-12 months postoperatively. However, increased opioid consumption after 9-12 months occurred in 17.6 (TKA) and 10.2% (THA) compared to 9.9 and 6.3% in opioid-naive TKA and THA patients, respectively. Increased NSAID and paracetamol use was seen in 11.5 and 12.4% of all patients. Preoperative analgesic use (any), TKA, psychiatric disorder, tobacco abuse, cardiac disease and use of walking aids were associated with increased opioid consumption. CONCLUSION Continued and increased opioid and other analgesic use occur in a clinically significant proportion of fast-track TKA and THA patients 9-12 months postoperatively, suggesting treatment failure and need for early intervention. Preoperative risk assessment may allow identification of patients in risk of increased postoperative opioid consumption. SIGNIFICANCE We found a considerable fraction of patients with continued or increased opioid consumption 9-12 months after fast-track THA and TKA. Increase in opioid consumption was more frequent in preoperative opioid users than opioid-naive patients, but a pattern of increased analgesic consumption was present across all analgesics. Our data demonstrate a need for increased focus on long-term analgesic strategies and postoperative follow-up after THA and TKA, especially in preoperative opioid users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C C Jørgensen
- The Lundbeck Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - M Petersen
- Department 7612, Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital, Denmark
| | - H Kehlet
- The Lundbeck Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - E K Aasvang
- The Lundbeck Centre for Fast-track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Anaesthesiological Department, The Abdominal Centre, 2044, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sharma A, Kudesia P, Shi Q, Gandhi R. Anxiety and depression in patients with osteoarthritis: impact and management challenges. Open Access Rheumatol 2016; 8:103-113. [PMID: 27843376 PMCID: PMC5098683 DOI: 10.2147/oarrr.s93516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anxiety and depression are common psychological comorbidities that impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients. In this systematic review, we 1) determined the impact of anxiety and depression on outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 2) summarized unique challenges these comorbidities present to current OA management. Patients and methods A systematic literature search was performed using the OVID Medline and EMBASE databases until April 2016. Full-text research articles published in English from the year 2000 onward with a sample size of >100 were included in this review. Eligible research articles were reviewed and the following data were extracted: study author(s), year of publication, study design, and key findings. Results A total of 38 studies were included in the present review. The present study found that both anxiety and/or depression were highly prevalent among patients with OA. Patients with OA diagnosed with these comorbidities experienced more pain, had frequent hospital visits, took more medication, and reported less optimal outcomes. Management strategies in the form of self-care, telephone support, audio/video education programs, and new pharmacotherapies were reported with favorable results. Conclusion Anxiety and depression adversely impact the QoL of patients with OA. Physicians/caregivers are highly recommended to consider these comorbidities in patients with OA. Ultimately, a holistic individualized management approach is necessary to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirudh Sharma
- Division of Genetics and Development, Krembil Research Institute
| | - Prtha Kudesia
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Qian Shi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rajiv Gandhi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|