Adoptive immunotherapy with autologous T-cell infusions reduces opioid requirements in advanced cancer patients

Pain in Palliative Cancer Patients - Analysis of the German National Palliative Care Registry

CONTEXT

Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life in patients with progressive diseases such as cancer. Effective cancer pain management is a major challenge of palliative treatment. Empirical data on the prevalence of cancer pain, the efficiency of pain treatment and influencing factors are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we investigated pain in cancer patients treated on inpatient palliative care wards in Germany.

METHODS

N = 4779 data sets provided by the German Palliative Care Registry from yearly evaluation periods between 2015 and 2020 were included. Pain ratings were assessed by professionals through a checklist of symptoms and problems (HOPE-SP-CL).

RESULTS

More than half of the included patients suffered from moderate/severe pain at the beginning of inpatient palliative care and in 71% of these patients, pain relief was achieved at the end of inpatient treatment. Pain intensity, depression and ECOG performance status at admission were weak predictors of later pain relief. The highest pain intensity at the beginning and least pain relief were found in patients with bone and cartilage cancer. The highest percentage of adequate pain control (81%) was seen in 2020.

CONCLUSION

Data from the German Palliative Care Registry confirmed that although increasingly better addressed over the years, insufficiently controlled cancer pain remains a challenge for palliative care units. Patient-specific (e.g. psychological comorbidity) and cancer-related (e.g. bone or cartilage cancer) risk factors for poor pain treatment underline the need for individualized multimodal pain management including psychological support.

Exploring shared targets in cancer immunotherapy and cancer-induced bone pain: Insights from preclinical studies

Cancer casts a profound shadow on global health, with pain emerging as one of the dominant and severe complications, particularly in advanced stages. The effective management of cancer-induced pain remains an unmet need. Emerging preclinical evidence suggests that targets related to tumor immunotherapy may also modulate cancer-related pain pathways, thus offering a promising therapeutic direction. This review, focusing on more than ten molecular targets that link cancer immunotherapy and cancer-induced bone pain, underscores their potential to tackle both aspects in the context of comprehensive cancer care. Emphasizing factors such as types of cancer, drug administration methods, and sex differences in the analgesic efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents provides neuroscientific insights into personalized pain management for patients with cancer.

Dissecting the link between PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy and cancer pain: mechanisms, research implications, and artificial intelligence perspectives

Cancer-related pain represents one of the most common complaints of cancer patients especially for those with advanced-stage of disease and/or bone metastases. More effective therapeutic strategies are needed not only to improve the survival of cancer patients but also to relieve cancer-related pain. In the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) has revolutionized cancer care. Beyond its anticancer role, PD-1/PD-L1 axis pathway is involved in many other physiological processes. PD-L1 expression is found in both malignant tissues and normal tissues including the dorsal root ganglion, and spinal cord. Through its interaction with PD-1, PD-L1 can modulate neuron excitability, leading to the suppression of inflammatory, neuropathic, and bone cancer pain. Therefore, since the intricate relationship between immunotherapy and pain should be largely dissected, this comprehensive review explores the complex relationship between PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy and cancer-related pain. It delves into the potential mechanisms through which PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy might modulate pain pathways, including neuroinflammation, neuromodulation, opioid mechanisms, and bone processes. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing future research directions in order to optimize pain management strategies in cancer patients. Finally, this article discusses the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing research and clinical practice in this context. AI-based strategies, such as analyzing large datasets and creating predictive models, can identify patterns and correlations between PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and pain. These tools can assist healthcare providers in tailoring treatment plans and pain management strategies to individual patients, ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life for those undergoing PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy.

Immunotherapies in chronic pain through modulation of neuroimmune interactions

It is generally believed that immune activation can elicit pain through production of inflammatory mediators that can activate nociceptive sensory neurons. Emerging evidence suggests that immune activation may also contribute to the resolution of pain by producing distinct pro-resolution/anti-inflammatory mediators. Recent research into the connection between the immune and nervous systems has opened new avenues for immunotherapy in pain management. This review provides an overview of the most utilized forms of immunotherapies (e.g., biologics) and highlight their potential for immune and neuronal modulation in chronic pain. Specifically, we discuss pain-related immunotherapy mechanisms that target inflammatory cytokine pathways, the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway, and the cGAS/STING pathway. This review also highlights cell-based immunotherapies targeting macrophages, T cells, neutrophils and mesenchymal stromal cells for chronic pain management.

Management of metastatic melanoma in Texas: disparities in the utilization of immunotherapy following the regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The utilization of modern-immunotherapies, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has increased markedly in patients with metastatic melanoma over the past decade and are recommended as standard treatment. Given their increasing adoption in routine care for melanoma, understanding patient access to immunotherapy and patterns of its use in Texas is crucial as it remains one of the few states without Medicaid expansion and with high rates of the uninsured population. The objectives of this study were to examine the trend in the utilization of immunotherapy and to determine factors associated with immunotherapy utilization among patients with metastatic melanoma in the era of ICIs in Texas.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) database. The cohort comprised of adult (≥ 18 years) patients with metastatic melanoma diagnosed between June 2011 and December 2018. The trend in immunotherapy utilization was assessed by determining the proportion of patients receiving immunotherapy each year. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) in immunotherapy utilization was assessed using joinpoint regression, while multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between patient characteristics and immunotherapy receipt.

RESULTS

A total of 1,795 adult patients with metastatic melanoma were identified from the TCR. Immunotherapy utilization was higher among younger patients, those with no comorbidities, and patients with private insurance. Multivariable analysis showed that the likelihood of receipt of immunotherapy decreased with older age [(adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR), 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89- 0.93, p = 0.001], living in high poverty neighborhood (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44 - 0.66, p < 0.0001), having Medicaid (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 - 0.73, p = 0.02), being uninsured (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.64, p = 0.01), and having comorbidities (CCI score 1: aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34 - 0.71, p = 0.003; CCI score ≥ 2: aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 - 0.56, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study identified sociodemographic and socioeconomic disparities in access to immunotherapy in Texas, highlighting the need for policies such as Medicaid expansion that would increase equitable access to this innovative therapy.

Management of pain in patients with bone metastases

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) has a considerable impact on patients’ quality of life as well as physical and mental health. At present, patients with CIBP are managed according to the three-step analgesic therapy algorithm proposed by the World Health Organization. Opioids are commonly used as the first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe cancer pain but are limited due to addiction, nausea, vomiting and other gastrointestinal side effects. Moreover, opioids have a limited analgesic effect in some patients. In order to optimize the management of CIBP, we must first identify the underlying mechanisms. In some patients, surgery, or surgery combined with radiotherapy or radiofrequency ablation is the first step in the management of CIBP. Various clinical studies have shown that anti-nerve growth factor (NGF) antibodies, bisphosphonates, or RANKL inhibitors can reduce the incidence and improve the management of cancer pain. Herein, we review the mechanisms of cancer pain and potential therapeutic strategies to provide insights for optimizing the management of CIBP.

Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Experiencing pain and insufficient relief can be devastating and negatively affect a patient's quality of life. Developments in oncology such as new treatments and adjusted pain management guidelines may have influenced the prevalence of cancer pain and severity in patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the prevalence and severity of pain in cancer patients in the 2014-2021 literature period. A systematic literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Titles and abstracts were screened, and full texts were evaluated and assessed on methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed on the pooled prevalence and severity rates. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore differences between treatment groups. We identified 10,637 studies, of which 444 studies were included. The overall prevalence of pain was 44.5%. Moderate to severe pain was experienced by 30.6% of the patients, a lower proportion compared to previous research. Pain experienced by cancer survivors was significantly lower compared to most treatment groups. Our results imply that both the prevalence of pain and pain severity declined in the past decade. Increased attention to the assessment and management of pain might have fostered the decline in the prevalence and severity of pain.

Chronic Cancer Pain: Opioids within Tumor Microenvironment Affect Neuroinflammation, Tumor and Pain Evolution

Pain can be a devastating experience for cancer patients, resulting in decreased quality of life. In the last two decades, immunological and pain research have demonstrated that pain persistence is primarily caused by neuroinflammation leading to central sensitization with brain neuroplastic alterations and changes in pain responsiveness (hyperalgesia, and pain behavior). Cancer pain is markedly affected by the tumor microenvironment (TME), a complex ecosystem consisting of different cell types (cancer cells, endothelial and stromal cells, leukocytes, fibroblasts and neurons) that release soluble mediators triggering neuroinflammation. The TME cellular components express opioid receptors (i.e., MOR) that upon engagement by endogenous or exogenous opioids such as morphine, initiate signaling events leading to neuroinflammation. MOR engagement does not only affect pain features and quality, but also influences directly and/or indirectly tumor growth and metastasis. The opioid effects on chronic cancer pain are also clinically characterized by altered opioid responsiveness (tolerance and hyperalgesia), a hallmark of the problematic long-term treatment of non-cancer pain. The significant progress made in understanding the immune-mediated development of chronic pain suggests its exploitation for novel alternative immunotherapeutic approaches.

Delta opioid receptors on nociceptive sensory neurons mediate peripheral endogenous analgesia in colitis

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory visceral pain is endogenously controlled by enkephalins locally released by mucosal CD4+ T lymphocytes in mice. The present study aimed at identifying opioid receptor(s) expressed on nociceptive sensory nerves involved in this peripheral opioid-mediated analgesia.

METHODS

The peripheral analgesia associated with the accumulation of CD4+ T lymphocytes within the inflamed colonic mucosa was assessed in conditional knockout mice specifically deleted for either of the two opioid receptors for enkephalins (i.e., µ (MOR) and δ (DOR) receptors) in Nav1.8-expressing sensory neurons in the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis model.

RESULTS

Endogenous analgesia is lost in conditional knockout mice for DOR, but not MOR at the later phase of the DSS-induced colitis. The absence of either of the opioid receptors on sensory nerves had no impact on both the colitis severity and the rate of T lymphocytes infiltrating the inflamed colonic mucosa.

CONCLUSION

The key role of DOR on primary afferents in relieving intestinal inflammatory pain opens new therapeutic opportunities for peripherally restricted DOR analgesics to avoid most of the side effects associated with MOR-targeting drugs used in intestinal disorders.

Peripherally acting opioid analgesics and peripherally-induced analgesia

The management of pain, particularly chronic pain, is still an area of medical need. In this context, opioids remain a gold standard for the treatment of pain. However, significant side effects, mainly of central origin, limit their clinical use. Here, we review recent progress to improve the therapeutic and safety profiles of opioids for pain management. Characterization of peripheral opioid-mediated pain mechanisms have been a key component of this process. Several studies identified peripheral µ, δ, and κ opioid receptors (MOR, DOR, and KOR, respectively) and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptors as significant players of opioid-mediated antinociception, able to achieve clinically significant effects independently of any central action. Following this, particularly from a medicinal chemistry point of view, main efforts have been directed towards the peripheralization of opioid receptor agonists with the objective of optimizing receptor activity and minimizing central exposure and the associated undesired effects. These activities have allowed the characterization of a great variety of compounds and investigational drugs that show low central nervous system (CNS) penetration (and therefore a reduced side effect profile) yet maintaining the desired opioid-related peripheral antinociceptive activity. These include highly hydrophilic/amphiphilic and massive molecules unable to easily cross lipid membranes, substrates of glycoprotein P (a extrusion pump that avoids CNS penetration), nanocarriers that release the analgesic agent at the site of inflammation and pain, and pH-sensitive opioid agonists that selectively activate at those sites (and represent a new pharmacodynamic paradigm). Hopefully, patients with pain will benefit soon from the incorporation of these new entities.

Immune cell-mediated opioid analgesia

Pathological pain is regulated by a balance between pro-algesic and analgesic mechanisms. Interactions between opioid peptide-producing immune cells and peripheral sensory neurons expressing opioid receptors represent a powerful intrinsic pain control in animal models and in humans. Therefore, treatments based on general suppression of immune responses have been mostly unsuccessful. It is highly desirable to develop strategies that specifically promote neuro-immune communication mediated by opioids. Promising examples include vaccination-based recruitment of opioid-containing leukocytes to painful tissue and the local reprogramming of pro-algesic immune cells into analgesic cells producing and secreting high amounts of opioid peptides. Such approaches have the potential to inhibit pain at its origin and be devoid of central and systemic side effects of classical analgesics. In support of these concepts, in this article, we describe the functioning of peripheral opioid receptors, migration of opioid-producing immune cells to inflamed tissue, opioid peptide release, and the consequent pain relief. Conclusively, we provide clinical evidence and discuss therapeutic opportunities and challenges associated with immune cell-mediated peripheral opioid analgesia.