Features and methods to discriminate between mechanism-based categories of pain experienced in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi expert consensus study

Toward Validation of Clinical Measures to Discriminate Between Nociceptive, Neuropathic, and Nociplastic Pain: Cluster Analysis of a Cohort With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

OBJECTIVES

The International Association for the Study of Pain defines 3 pain types presumed to involve different mechanisms-nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. Based on the hypothesis that pain types should guide the matching of patients with treatments, work has been undertaken to identify features to discriminate between them for clinical use. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of features to discriminate between pain types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjective and physical features were evaluated in a cohort of 350 individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain attending a chronic pain management program. The analysis tested the hypothesis that, if features nominated for each pain type represent 3 different groups, then (1) cluster analysis should identify 3 main clusters of patients, (2) these clusters should align with the pain type allocated by an experienced clinician, (3) patients within a cluster should have high expression of the candidate features proposed to assist identification of that pain type. Supervised machine learning interrogated features with the greatest and least importance for discrimination, and probabilistic analysis probed the potential for the coexistence of multiple pain types.

RESULTS

Results confirmed that data could be best explained by 3 clusters. Clusters were characterized by a priori specified features and agreed with the designation of the experienced clinician with 82% accuracy. Supervised analysis highlighted features that contributed most and least to the classification of pain type, and probabilistic analysis reinforced the presence of mixed pain types.

DISCUSSION

These findings support the foundation for further refinement of a clinical tool to discriminate between pain types.

Frequency of central sensitization and nociplastic pain in patients with plantar fasciitis : Central sensitization and nociplastic pain in plantar fasciitis

PURPOSE

If the pain persists for a long time in the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF) or if there is no response to treatment, central sensitization (CS) may develop and the pain may transform into nociplastic pain (NP). This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of CS and NP in patients with PF.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was undertaken between November 2023 and March 2024. The Foot Function Index (FFI) scale, which evaluates the foot's functionality, was applied to the patient group. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which evaluates pain intensity; the Pain-DETECT scale, which evaluates NP; and the Central Sensitization Scale (CSI), which evaluates CS, were applied to patient and control groups.

RESULTS

A total of 206 people were included in the study; 106 were in the patient group with PF, and 100 constituted the control group. While we detected NP in 67 (63.2%) patients according to Pain-DETECT and CS was detected in 91 (85.8%) patients according to CSI among 106 patients with chronic PF; we detected NP in seven (7%) patients according to Pain-DETECT and CS in 44 (44.0%) patients according to CSI among 100 control patients. VAS-score and FFI-pain are moderately and positively correlated with pain-DETECT scores and fairly and positively correlated with CSI scores in the PF group. The pain-DETECT score is moderately and positively correlated with the CSI score in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the presence of CS and NP in PF patients. We found NP and CS to be common in patients with chronic PF. Effective pain management in patients with PF before it becomes chronic can prevent the development of CS and NP.

Laryngeal Hypersensitivity From the Perspective of Pain Science: An Integrative Review of Empirical Studies on Associated Factors and Processes

OBJECTIVE

Laryngeal hypersensitivity (LHS) is a state of heightened sensorimotor response to stimuli in the upper airway. Although its clinical picture is becoming progressively clearer with recent research progress, specificities about its associated factors and processes remain to be clarified. The aim of this integrative review was to synthesize published empirical data from human studies on LHS, focusing on related factors and pathophysiology.

STUDY DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES

Integrative review of the literature; Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Science.

METHODS

Keywords associated with the following three main concepts were used to query databases: (1) manifestations potentially associated with an irritable larynx (dysphonia, inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO), chronic cough, and globus); (2) hypersensitivity; and (3) pathophysiology. Peer-reviewed studies in English providing empirical original research data on the pathophysiology of LHS were included, with no restriction based on study design.

RESULTS

In total, 54 papers met the inclusion criteria. Factors potentially associated with LHS were identified, namely (1) psychological and lifestyle factors, (2) upper airway inflammation and injuries from exogenous/endogenous irritants, infections, or mucosal atrophy, (3) sex hormones, (4) metabolic abnormalities, and (5) aberrant respiratory behavior. Given the parallels between pain-related mechanisms and suggested LHS mechanisms, processes identified as putatively contributing to LHS were categorized in light of the current pain literature. Findings suggest that LHS may stem from a peripheral tissue insult, a neuropathic insult, and/or maladaptive neuroplasticity. Gaps in the literature were identified, in part driven by an uneven repartition of research across the various alleged manifestations of LHS. In fact, a large majority of studies pertained to chronic cough, with very few addressing muscle tension dysphonia, ILO, and globus.

CONCLUSION

Future research can focus on the potential role of hypersensitivity in manifestations such as muscle tension dysphonia and ILO, and on the development of guidelines to identify the specific underlying factors and mechanisms at play in LHS symptoms.

Individuals with chronic low back pain show impaired adaptations of lumbar extensor muscle reflex amplitude during unexpected perturbations

PURPOSE

This study investigated the adaptability of trunk muscle responses to a series of unexpected external perturbations in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

Thirty-seven adult participants, including 19 without LBP (control group) and 18 with chronic LBP, were submitted to 15 repetitions of trunk perturbations applied in a posterior-to-anterior direction, inducing trunk flexion. High-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) was used to analyze lumbar muscle reflex amplitude. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (2 × 2) was conducted to compare group differences and the effect of trial repetition over time (first five trials vs. last five trials of perturbations).

RESULTS

Significant interaction effects were found on both sides (Left: p = 0.038; Right: p = 0.007). Post hoc comparisons revealed a decrease in response amplitude only in the control group between the first and last five perturbations, with reductions of 5.0% on the left side (p = 0.026, Bonferroni corrected) and 5.7% on the right side (p = 0.030, Bonferroni corrected). In contrast, individuals with chronic LBP showed no significant adaptation through repetition in the reflex response amplitude of the lumbar extensor muscles (post hoc both sides: p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Individuals with chronic LBP fail to adapt reflex amplitudes to repeated perturbations, possibly due to impaired proprioception, reduced motor variability and neuroplastic changes observed in individuals with chronic LBP. These changes might limit their ability to optimize responses to repeated perturbations, potentially compromising spinal stability and increasing functional cost.

Methods to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic in children & adolescents: A systematic review of psychometric properties and feasibility

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and critically analyse the tools available for categorising pain as nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain in children and adolescents. Studies were included if they (i) included children and adolescents with a mean age of 0-24 years old, (ii) examined assessment tools that categorise pain as nociceptive, neuropathic or nociplastic, and (iii) examined the psychometric properties of the tools. Sensitive searches were conducted in five online databases in March 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality by two authors using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The search yielded 26 studies for 11 tools. No assessment tool had evidence for all nine recommended psychometric properties. Quantitative Sensory Testing, a tool used to identify signs and symptoms of nociplastic and neuropathic pain, was the most studied tool and had moderate evidence for construct validity, criterion validity and reliability. Three self-reported questionnaires, the Self-reported Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS), Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) and PainDETECT, had moderate evidence for construct validity and show promise as preliminary tools to identify possible neuropathic or nociplastic pain. However, they had low specificity when used in isolation. All assessment methods would benefit from further psychometric evaluation and validation in children and adolescents. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review highlights the limited validation of pain assessment tools for children and adolescents. While Quantitative Sensory Testing and self-reported questionnaires show promise in identifying pain mechanisms, their applicability remains uncertain. Further psychometric validation is crucial to improve pain assessment and guide personalized treatment in young populations.

Development and application of predictive clinical biomarkers for low back pain care: recommendations from the ISSLS phenotype/precision spine focus group

Predictive biomarkers (or moderators of treatment) are features, or more likely feature clusters, that discriminate individuals who are more likely to experience a favourable or unfavourable effect from a specific treatment. Utilization of validated predictive biomarkers for chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatments is a plausible strategy to guide patients more rapidly to effective treatments thereby reducing wastage of finite healthcare funds on treatments that are ineffective (or potentially harmful). Yet, few predictive biomarkers have been successfully validated in clinical studies. This paper summarizes work by the Phenotype/Precision Spine Focus Group of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine that addressed: (1) relevant definitions for terminology; (2) advantages and disadvantages of different research approaches for the specification of predictive biomarkers; (3) methods for assessment of clinical validity; (4) approaches for their implementation; (5) barriers to predictive biomarker identification; and (6) a prioritised list of recommendations for the development and refinement of predictive biomarkers for CLBP. Key recommendations include the harmonisation of data collection, data sharing, integration of theoretical models, development of new treatments, and health economic analyses to inform cost-benefit of assessments and the application of matched treatments. The complexity of CLBP demands large datasets to derive meaningful progress. This will require coordinated and substantive collaboration involving multiple disciplines and across the research spectrum from the basic sciences to clinical applications.

Differences in the clinical presentation of chronic whiplash-associated disorders and nontraumatic neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Health outcomes may be worse for individuals with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) compared to nontraumatic neck pain (NTNP), and clinical characteristics may differ. This systematic review examined evidence comparing WAD and NTNP in terms of pain, disability, psychological status, quality of life, measures of nociceptive processing, movement, sensorimotor, and muscle function. Studies were identified through electronic database searches and included after screening against predefined eligibility criteria. Standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Associations between MDs with demographics and study characteristics were explored using meta-regression. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Sixty-one studies were eligible with 45 included in meta-analysis. Individuals with WAD reported clinically relevant higher disability (100-point Neck Disability Index MD [95% CI] 11.15 [8.63, 13.68]), greater remote cold sensitivity (SMD 0.89 [0.57, 1.21]), lower quality of life (SMD -0.96 [-1.77, -0.16]), greater depression (SMD 0.60 [0.27, 0.93]), greater local (SMD -0.56 [-1.00, -0.13]) and remote (SMD -0.50 [-0.81, -0.19]) pressure sensitivity, less cervical flexion (MD -5.30° [-7.44, -3.16]) and extension (MD -5.43° [-9.31, -1.55]), higher pain intensity (100-point numerical rating scale: MD 8.15 [5.80, 10.50]), and greater kinesiophobia (SMD 0.35 [0.11, 0.59]). No between-group differences were found for dizziness symptoms, stress, anxiety, balance, and local cold sensitivity. Meta-regression indicated that disability differences were negatively associated with age (R2 = 29.6%, P = 0.006). Certainty of evidence was mostly moderate. Individuals with chronic WAD have a worse clinical presentation compared to those with chronic NTNP, which has implications for patient assessment and management.

Applying Nociplastic Pain Criteria in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Vignette Study

Background/Objectives: The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) recently introduced clinical criteria and a grading system to identify nociplastic pain, marking a pivotal step toward improving diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the IASP criteria using clinical vignettes, assessing their effectiveness in identifying nociplastic pain in clinical settings. Methods: A reliability and diagnostic accuracy study was conducted using 32 clinical vignettes based on the literature and pre-existing clinical data. The vignettes represented patients with and without the characteristics of nociplastic pain and were reviewed independently by two expert physiotherapists. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were evaluated with a 1-month interval between assessments. Criterion validity was analyzed by comparing the IASP criteria against the standardized vignettes as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. Results: The IASP criteria demonstrated moderate-to-perfect intra-rater agreement (κ = 0.71-1.00, p < 0.05) and weak-to-perfect inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.52-1.00, p < 0.05). Criterion validity was moderate (κ = 0.68), with strong specificity (89.0%) and moderate sensitivity (69.0%). Positive and negative predictive values were high at 81.8% and 81.0%, respectively, supporting the criteria's accuracy in identifying and excluding nociplastic pain. Conclusions: The IASP criteria for nociplastic pain exhibited satisfactory reliability and criterion validity in this preliminary study, particularly after initial rater familiarization. Future research should evaluate their application in real-world clinical settings, explore concurrent and prognostic validity, and involve a broader range of raters to enhance generalizability.

Rehabilitation Management of Neck Pain-Development of a Diagnostic Framework Based on the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model

RATIONALE

Neck pain is a major cause of disability worldwide, and current rehabilitation strategies show limited effectiveness. Subgrouping patients by their primary pain and disability drivers can help tailor treatments. At this end, the Pain and Disability Drivers Management (PDDM) was developed and has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in the management of low back pain. Nevertheless, the PDDM model was only validated for this population. Adapting this framework to patients with neck pain would provide a more global view of the patient's experience of pain and support a genuine biopsychosocial intervention.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop and validate the content of the PDDM model for patients living with neck pain.

METHODS

Through a modified DELPHI study design, participants with clinical and research expertize in rehabilitation of neck pain were invited to participate. A questionnaire was developed using literature reviews and endorsed by a steering committee. The relevance of each element of the newly adapted model was evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. An item reached consensus if it obtained the predefined threshold of > 78% "relevant" and "very relevant." Participants left comments on terminology and recommended items to add in early rounds. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

An invitation was sent to 1650 potential participants, from which 155 accessed the survey, 64 completed the first round and 55 the second round. A total of 70 elements met consensus and were distributed across six domains: "Nociceptive pain drivers", "nociplastic pain drivers," "drivers associated with neuropathic pain", "comorbidity drivers", "cognitive-emotional drivers" and "environmental or lifestyle drivers, and social determinants of health."

CONCLUSION

Through a modified DELPHI study, the PDDM model was updated and adapted to people with neck pain. Subsequent steps include clinical integration and measures of efficacy when used for assessment/treatment.

Application of the grading system for "nociplastic pain" in chronic primary and chronic secondary pain conditions: a field study

ABSTRACT

The concept "nociplastic pain" has been developed for patients with features of nociceptive system sensitization that are not explained as nociceptive or neuropathic. Here, we tested how well the recently published grading system differentiates between chronic primary and secondary pain conditions. We recruited patients with fibromyalgia (FMS, n = 41), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, n = 11), osteoarthritis (OA, n = 21), or peripheral nerve injury (PNI, n = 8). We used clinical history, pain drawings, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and questionnaires to classify their pains as possibly or probably "nociplastic." All patients with chronic primary pain exhibited widespread/regional pain not explainable by either nociceptive or neuropathic mechanisms. Widespread pain occurred in 12 patients with OA but was identified as nociceptive in 11 of 12. Regional pain occurred in 4 patients with PNI but was identified as neuropathic in 3 of 4. At this step, the grading system had 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Clinical evidence for pain hypersensitivity by QST, and history of hypersensitivity and mental comorbidities did not differentiate between chronic primary pain (QST: 36/52 = 69%, history: 43/52 = 83%) and secondary pain conditions (QST: 20/29 = 69%, history: 24/29 83%). Based on these data, specificity remained excellent (93%), but sensitivity dropped substantially (60%) due to lacking evidence for pain hypersensitivity in many patients with FMS. This low sensitivity suggests that the published grading system is not suitable for screening purposes. We suggest structural and content modifications to improve sensitivity, including placement of patient history before clinical examination and addition of a high tender point count as evidence for widespread pain hypersensitivity.

An exploratory data-driven approach to classify subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorders based on pain mechanisms

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a common musculoskeletal condition, presenting treatment challenges due to their non-specific nature. Categorizing patients with TMDs into clusters based on neurobiological pain mechanisms could provide a promising approach to facilitate targeted treatments. This observational study (1) used a network analysis (NA) to explore the complexity of TMDs by investigating relationships among biopsychosocial variables, and (2) validated potential TMD subgroups based on mechanism-specific pain categories. One hundred and two patients with TMD were included. Biopsychosocial variables covered: general health, psychosocial features, TMD pain, and TMD characteristics. A NA evaluated the associations between variables and determined the role of each feature within the network. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify TMD subgroups. The NA revealed significant correlations primarily within the same feature domains, indicating a strong interplay between symptoms and psychological factors. Cluster analysis identified two subgroups driven by nociceptive and nociplastic pain mechanisms; the nociplastic group exhibited higher levels of anxiety, depression, pain catastrophization, central sensitization, pain duration, and more pain locations, along with poorer sleep quality, quality of life, and health status. In contrast, the nociceptive group exhibited restricted maximal mouth opening (MMO), heightened pain during TMJ palpation and mouth opening, and a greater positive response to manual therapy. Across all features, psychological factors, pain locations, and MMO primarily contributed to the separation of subgroups. By adopting a data-driven approach, these results support the significant role of considering the neurobiological basis of pain to improve patient classification. This knowledge may facilitate clinical reasoning and personalized treatments. PERSPECTIVE: This study used a network analysis to explore the complex biopsychosocial interactions present in people with TMDs, identifying important variables such as the Central Sensitization Inventory and pain-free maximal mouth opening. The findings distinguish potential nociceptive and nociplastic pain subgroups, offering important insights for targeted therapeutic strategies.

Comparisons of the effects of psychologically-informed and usual physiotherapy on pain sensitivity in chronic low back pain: an exploratory randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The presence of altered central pain processing and modulation, as well as negative psychological factors, have been suggested to impede recovery in chronic low back pain (CLBP). Psychologically-informed physiotherapy (PiP) aims to specifically address the latter factors-in addition to physical factors-to improve treatment effects. This study aims to determine if the effect of PiP is superior to usual physiotherapy (UP) on pain sensitivity and modulation in participants with CLBP and if changes in these variables were associated with changes in clinical outcomes.

Methods

Forty participants with CLBP were randomly allocated to PiP or UP. Seven physiotherapy sessions over 6 weeks plus a booster session at an 11-week follow-up were delivered. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation of pain (TSP), and exercise-induced hypoalgesia were assessed on lumbar, upper, and lower limb sites at baseline and after 6 weeks. Linear mixed models tested if PiP was superior to UP on pain sensitivity/modulation. Linear regressions tested if pain sensitivity/modulation changes were associated with changes in clinical outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning, symptoms of central sensitization).

Results

PiP was not superior to UP to modulate pain sensitivity/modulation variables. All PPTs increased after 6 weeks regardless of the approach. Lumbar PPT and lumbar and lower limb TSP changes were associated with physical functioning changes.

Conclusion

Although our study suggests that neither approach has a superiority to impact on pain sensitivity, both approaches elicited widespread hypoalgesia. Future powered trials should verify if pain sensitivity can be a mediator of physical functioning improvement, as suggested by our results.

The concept of nociplastic pain-where to from here?

ABSTRACT

Nociplastic pain, a third mechanistic pain descriptor in addition to nociceptive and neuropathic pain, was adopted in 2017 by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). It is defined as "pain that arises from altered nociception" not fully explained by nociceptive or neuropathic pain mechanisms. Peripheral and/or central sensitization, manifesting as allodynia and hyperalgesia, is typically present, although not specific for nociplastic pain. Criteria for possible nociplastic pain manifesting in the musculoskeletal system define a minimum of 4 conditions: (1) pain duration of more than 3 months; (2) regional, multifocal or widespread rather than discrete distribution of pain; (3) pain cannot entirely be explained by nociceptive or neuropathic mechanisms; and (4) clinical signs of pain hypersensitivity present in the region of pain. Educational endeavors and field testing of criteria are needed. Pharmacological treatment guidelines, based on the three pain types, need to be developed. Currently pharmacological treatments of nociplastic pain resemble those of neuropathic; however, opioids should be avoided. A major challenge is to unravel pathophysiological mechanisms driving altered nociception in patients suffering from nociplastic pain. Examples from fibromyalgia would include pathophysiology of the peripheral as well as central nervous system, such as autoreactive antibodies acting at the level of the dorsal root ganglia and aberrant cerebral pain processing, including altered brain network architecture. Understanding pathophysiological mechanisms and their interactions is a prerequisite for the development of diagnostic tests allowing for individualized treatments and development of new strategies for prevention and treatment.

A biopsychosocial approach to phenotyping people with knee osteoarthritis awaiting total knee arthroplasty: A secondary cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous research showed chronic post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) pain in 20% of people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Various preoperative biopsychosocial-related factors have been described, but phenotyping people with KOA awaiting TKA based on these factors is still lacking. This could be relevant to understanding differences in TKA surgery responses.

OBJECTIVE

To identify phenotypes in people with KOA awaiting TKA and differences in post-TKA pain based on preoperative biopsychosocial factors.

METHODS

People with KOA awaiting TKA in 4 hospitals in Belgium and the Netherlands were included. A cross-sectional latent profile analysis was conducted on structural, metabolic, functional, pain-related, psychological and social variables. Concurrent validity was tested using 3-step multinomial logistic regression. The difference in one-year post-TKA pain was examined with linear mixed model analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventeen participants were included in the latent profile analysis with a mean (SD) age of 65.5 (7.7) years, including 109 women. A model with 2 phenotypes differed in 14 out of 21 variables. Participants with phenotype 2 (28%) had a higher body mass index (BMI), higher chance of having less structural damage (KOA grade), lower mean quadriceps strength and physical function (Knee Society Scoring System functional and 30-second chair stand test), higher pain intensity, number of pain locations, and indices of central sensitisation (temporal summation, central sensitisation inventory score, and lower pressure pain thresholds), higher pain catastrophising, anxiety and depression, and higher post-TKA pain intensity compared to phenotype 1 (72%). Concurrent validity was confirmed in 3 out of 4 variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotype 2 (28%) with nociplastic pain characteristics in combination with worse psychological factors, BMI, functional and structural factors, and phenotype 1 (72%) not representing these characteristics were identified. Phenotype 2 had worse pain intensity scores after TKA compared to phenotype 1. Attention to the characteristics of phenotype 2 is warranted concerning post-TKA pain.

DATABASE REGISTRATION

The protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05380648).

Effects of therapeutic exercise on pain processing in people with chronic non-specific neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain may experience altered sensory processing, potentially contributing to the modest response to therapeutic exercise treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to explore the effect of therapeutic exercise on pain processing among patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SportDiscus, and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing therapeutic exercise to non-exercise treatments or no treatment. The screening and data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. The methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary outcomes assessed were pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials included a total of 948 participants, with 586 in the exercise therapy group and 362 in the non-exercise group. The therapeutic exercise was not superior to non-exercise treatments for both local and PPT in the immediate (MD = 0.13, 95%CI = -0.18 to 0.43), and short-term follow-up (MD = 0.17, 95%CI = -0.27 to 0.61). In the medium term, therapeutic exercise demonstrated a small effect size in increasing local PPT (Kg/cm2) (MD = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.08 to 1.19) compared to non-exercise interventions. The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was very low.

CONCLUSIONS

There is very low certainty of evidence that therapeutic exercise is not superior than non-exercise treatment on pain processing in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.

The role of neutrophils in pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies

ABSTRACT

The peripheral inflammatory response is an attractive therapeutic target for pain treatment. Neutrophils are the first circulating inflammatory cells recruited to sites of injury, but their contribution to pain outcomes is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of original preclinical studies, which evaluated the effect of preemptive neutrophil depletion on pain outcomes (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022364004). Literature search (PubMed, January 19, 2023) identified 49 articles, which were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. The risk of bias was evaluated using SYRCLE's tool. The pooled effect considering all studies showed that neutrophil depletion induced a consistent pain reduction. Inflammatory, joint, neuropathic, and visceral pain showed significant pain alleviation by neutrophil depletion with medium-large effect sizes. However, muscle and postoperative pain were not significantly alleviated by neutrophil depletion. Further analysis showed a differential contribution of neutrophils to pain outcomes. Neutrophils had a higher impact on mechanical hyperalgesia, followed by nociceptive behaviors and mechanical allodynia, with a smaller contribution to thermal hyperalgesia. Interspecies (mice or rats) differences were not appreciated. Analyses regarding intervention unveiled a lower pain reduction for some commonly used methods for neutrophil depletion, such as injection of antineutrophil serum or an anti-Gr-1 antibody, than for other agents such as administration of an anti-Ly6G antibody, fucoidan, vinblastine, CXCR1/2 inhibitors, and etanercept. In conclusion, the contribution of neutrophils to pain depends on pain etiology (experimental model), pain outcome, and the neutrophil depletion strategy. Further research is needed to improve our understanding on the mechanisms of these differences.

Altered Sensory Processing in People Attending Specialist Orthopaedic Consultation for Management of Persistent Shoulder Pain: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare sensory processing measures in people attending specialist orthopaedic consultation for management of persistent shoulder pain with control participants. The secondary objective was to compare the groups' sociodemographic, clinical, general health and lifestyle, and psychological characteristics. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional. METHODS: Participants with shoulder pain for ≥3 months, who attended a public hospital orthopaedic department (n = 119), and community participants without shoulder pain (n = 44) underwent a standardized quantitative sensory testing protocol, measuring pressure pain threshold, temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Sociodemographic, clinical, general health and lifestyle, and psychological characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: Participants with shoulder pain had significantly lower pressure pain thresholds at all sites (ie, local and widespread mechanical hyperalgesia) and significantly decreased conditioned pain modulation effect (ie, descending inhibition of nociception) than control participants. There was no significant difference between groups for temporal summation. Participants with shoulder pain had decreased general health and function, less healthy lifestyles, and poorer psychological health compared with controls. CONCLUSION: People referred to specialist orthopaedic care for management of persistent shoulder pain had clinical signs of altered sensory processing and poor health outcomes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):1-10. Epub 25 July 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12512.

Application of the IASP Grading System to Identify Underlying Pain Mechanisms in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to apply the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) grading system for identifying nociplastic pain in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and propose criteria to fine-tune decision-making. In addition, the study aimed to characterize a "probable" versus "no or possible" nociplastic pain mechanism using biopsychosocial variables and compare both groups in their 1-year post-TKA response.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of baseline data of a longitudinal prospective study involving 197 patients with KOA awaiting total TKA in Belgium and the Netherlands was performed. Two approaches, one considering 4 and the other 3 pain locations (step 2 of the grading system), were presented. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to compare the probable and no or possible nociplastic pain mechanism groups for several preoperative biopsychosocial-related variables and 1-year postoperative pain. Also, a sensitivity analysis, comparing 3 pain mechanism groups, was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty (15.22%-approach 4 pain locations) and 46 (23.35%-approach 3 pain locations) participants were categorized under probable nociplastic pain. Irrespective of the pain location approach or sensitivity analysis, the probable nociplastic pain group included more woman, was younger, exhibited worse results on various preoperative pain-related and psychological variables, and had more pain 1-year post-TKA compared with the other group.

DISCUSSION

This study proposed additional criteria to fine-tune the grading system for nociplastic pain (except for discrete/regional/multifocal/widespread pain) and characterized a subgroup of patients with KOA with probable nociplastic pain. Future research is warranted for further validation.

Rethinking neck-related arm pain: hypothetical clinical scenarios to differentiate the underlying IASP-defined pain mechanisms

Neck-related arm pain is frequently encountered in clinical settings, yet its underlying pain mechanisms remain elusive. While such pain radiating from the neck to the arm is often attributed to injuries or diseases of the nervous system (neuropathic pain), it can also arise from nociceptive (referred) or nociplastic sources. Regrettably, patients exhibiting this specific pain distribution are frequently diagnosed with varying terms, including 'cervicobrachialgia', 'cervicobrachial neuralgia', 'cervicobrachial pain syndrome', and 'cervical radiculopathy'. The ambiguity surrounding these diagnostic labels complicates the clinical reasoning process. It is imperative for clinicians to discern and comprehend the dominant pain mechanism. Three distinct hypothetical clinical scenarios depict patients with almost identical pain distribution but divergent dominant pain mechanisms. Within these scenarios, both subjective and objective examinations are employed to elucidate the dominant pain mechanism associated with neck-related arm pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. Furthermore, clinicians must remain aware that the dominant pain mechanism can evolve over time.

Indication for spinal sensitization in chronic low back pain: mechanical hyperalgesia adjacent to but not within the most painful body area

Introduction

In 85% of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), no specific pathoanatomical cause can be identified. Besides primary peripheral drivers within the lower back, spinal or supraspinal sensitization processes might contribute to the patients' pain.

Objectives

The present study conceptualized the most painful area (MP) of patients with nonspecific CLBP as primarily affected area and assessed signs of peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal sensitization using quantitative sensory testing (QST) in MP, a pain-free area adjacent to MP (AD), and a remote, pain-free control area (CON).

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with CLBP (51 years, SD = 16.6, 22 female patients) and 35 pain-free control participants individually matched for age, sex, and testing areas (49 years, SD = 17.5, 19 female participants) underwent a full QST protocol in MP and a reduced QST protocol assessing sensory gain in AD and CON. Quantitative sensory testing measures, except paradoxical heat sensations and dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), were Z-transformed to the matched control participants and tested for significance using Z-tests (α = 0.001). Paradoxical heat sensations and DMA occurrence were compared between cohorts using Fisher's exact tests (α = 0.05). The same analyses were performed with a high-pain and a low-pain CLBP subsample (50% quantile).

Results

Patients showed cold and vibration hypoesthesia in MP (all Ps < 0.001) and mechanical hyperalgesia (P < 0.001) and more frequent DMA (P = 0.044) in AD. The results were mainly driven by the high-pain CLBP subsample. In CON, no sensory alterations were observed.

Conclusion

Mechanical hyperalgesia and DMA adjacent to but not within MP, the supposedly primarily affected area, might reflect secondary hyperalgesia originating from spinal sensitization in patients with CLBP.

Reduction of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain by Spinal Manipulative Therapy is Accompanied by Decreases in Segmental Mechanical Hyperalgesia and Pain Catastrophizing: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Dual-blind Mixed Experimental Trial

Chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) refers to low back pain that persists over 3 months, that cannot be explained by another chronic condition, and that is associated with emotional distress and disability. Previous studies have shown that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is effective in relieving CPLBP, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This randomized placebo-controlled dual-blind mixed experimental trial (NCT05162924) aimed to investigate the efficacy of SMT to improve CPLBP and its underlying mechanisms. Ninety-eight individuals with CPLBP and 49 controls were recruited. Individuals with CPLBP received SMT (n = 49) or a control intervention (n = 49), 12 times over 4 weeks. The primary outcomes were CPLBP intensity (0-100 on a numerical rating scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included pressure pain thresholds in 4 body regions, pain catastrophizing, Central Sensitization Inventory, depressive symptoms, and anxiety scores. Individuals with CPLBP showed widespread mechanical hyperalgesia (P < .001) and higher scores for all questionnaires (P < .001). SMT reduced pain intensity compared with the control intervention (mean difference: -11.7 [95% confidence interval, -11.0 to -12.5], P = .01), but not disability (P = .5). Similar mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both groups. Mechanical hyperalgesia at the manipulated segment was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05). Pain catastrophizing was reduced after SMT compared with the control intervention (P < .05), but this effect was not significant after accounting for changes in clinical pain. Although the reduction of segmental mechanical hyperalgesia likely contributes to the clinical benefits of SMT, the role of pain catastrophizing remains to be clarified. PERSPECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial found that 12 sessions of SMT yield greater relief of CPLBP than a control intervention. These clinical effects were independent of expectations, and accompanied by an attenuation of hyperalgesia in the targeted segment and a modulation of pain catastrophizing.

Deciphering nociplastic pain: clinical features, risk factors and potential mechanisms

Nociplastic pain is a mechanistic term used to describe pain that arises or is sustained by altered nociception, despite the absence of tissue damage. Although nociplastic pain has distinct pathophysiology from nociceptive and neuropathic pain, these pain mechanisms often coincide within individuals, which contributes to the intractability of chronic pain. Key symptoms of nociplastic pain include pain in multiple body regions, fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive dysfunction, depression and anxiety. Individuals with nociplastic pain are often diffusely tender - indicative of hyperalgesia and/or allodynia - and are often more sensitive than others to non-painful sensory stimuli such as lights, odours and noises. This Review summarizes the risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment of nociplastic pain, and describes how alterations in brain function and structure, immune processing and peripheral factors might contribute to the nociplastic pain phenotype. This article concludes with a discussion of two proposed subtypes of nociplastic pain that reflect distinct neurobiological features and treatment responsivity.

Could painful temporomandibular disorders be nociplastic in nature? A critical review and new proposal

Classification of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and, indeed, all types of orofacial pains has significantly progressed in the last decade based on international consensus work and operationalized clustering of signs and symptoms. A challenging gap nevertheless continues to exist in terms of understanding the underlying pain mechanisms and link to management. Recently, a novel mechanistic descriptor 'nociplastic pain' was introduced, and diagnostic algorithms and characteristic features were proposed. This narrative and critical review aim to discuss to what extent could painful TMD conditions fit into this category. Moreover, a number of less common types of orofacial pain could possibly also reflect nociplastic pain mechanisms. A model to differentiate TMD pain mechanisms is proposed, and the implications for management are discussed. The purpose of this review is to stimulate original and novel research into mechanisms of orofacial pain and hopefully thereby improve management of the individual patient.

Adults with excess weight or obesity, but not with overweight, report greater pain intensities than individuals with normal weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Context

Over 1.9 billion adult people have overweight or obesity. Considered as a chronic disease itself, obesity is associated with several comorbidities. Chronic pain affects approximately 60 million people and its connection with obesity has been displayed in several studies. However, controversial results showing both lower and higher pain thresholds in subjects with obesity compared to individuals with normal weight and the different parameters used to define such association (e.g., pain severity, frequency or duration) make it hard to draw straight forward conclusions in the matter. The objective of this article is to examine the relationship between overweight and obesity (classified with BMI as recommended by WHO) and self-perceived pain intensity in adults.

Methods

A literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using the databases CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify original studies that provide BMI values and their associated pain intensity assessed by self-report scales. Self-report pain scores were normalized and pooled within meta-analyses. The Cochrane's Q test and I2 index were used to clarify the amount of heterogeneity; meta-regression was performed to explore the relationship between each outcome and the risk of bias.

Results

Of 2194 studies, 31 eligible studies were identified and appraised, 22 of which provided data for a quantitative analysis. The results herein suggested that adults with excess weight (BMI ≥ 25.0) or obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0) but not with overweight (pre-obesity) alone (BMI 25.0-29.9), are more likely to report greater intensities of pain than individuals of normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9). Subgroup analyses regarding the pathology of the patients showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Also, influence of age in the effect size, evaluated by meta-regression, was only observed in one of the four analyses. Furthermore, the robustness of the findings was supported by two different sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Subjects with obesity and excess weight, but not overweight, reported greater pain intensities than individuals with normal weight. This finding encourages treatment of obesity as a component of pain management. More research is required to better understand the mechanisms of these differences and the clinical utility of the findings.

Systematic Review Registration

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RF2G3, identifier OSF.IO/RF2G3.

Nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic low back pain? The low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium's international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations

The potential to classify low back pain as being characterised by dominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic mechanisms is a clinically relevant issue. Preliminary evidence suggests that these low back pain phenotypes might respond differently to treatments; however, more research must be done before making specific recommendations. Accordingly, the low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium was established as a group of 36 clinicians and researchers from 13 countries (five continents) and 29 institutions, to apply a modified Nominal Group Technique methodology to develop international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations to provide guidance for identifying the dominant pain phenotype in patients with low back pain, and potentially adapt pain management strategies. The BACPAP consortium's recommendations are also intended to provide direction for future clinical research by building on the established clinical criteria for neuropathic and nociplastic pain. The BACPAP consortium's consensus recommendations are a necessary early step in the process to determine if personalised pain medicine based on pain phenotypes is feasible for low back pain management. Therefore, these recommendations are not ready to be implemented in clinical practice until additional evidence is generated that is specific to these low back pain phenotypes.

An overview of systematic reviews examining the quantitative sensory testing-derived hypoalgesic effects of manual therapy for musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND

Changes in quantitative sensory testing (QST) after manual therapy can provide insight into pain relief mechanisms. Prior systematic reviews have evaluated manual-therapy-induced QST change. This overview of systematic reviews aims to consolidate this body of literature and critically review evidence on the hypoalgesic effects of manual therapy in clinical populations.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Embase. Peer-reviewed systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were eligible if the reviews examined the effect of manual therapy compared to non-manual therapy interventions on QST outcomes in clinical populations. Methodological quality was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. Meta-analysis results and qualitative (non-meta-analysis) interpretations were summarized by type of manual therapy. Overlap of studies was examined with the corrected covered area (CCA) index.

RESULTS

Thirty systematic reviews, including 11 meta-analyses, met inclusion. There was a slight overlap in studies (CCA of 1.72% for all reviews and 1.69% for meta-analyses). Methodological quality was predominantly low to critically low. Eight (27%) reviews examined studies with a range of manual therapy types, 13 (43%) reviews focused on joint-biased manual therapy, 7 (23%) reviews focused on muscle-biased manual therapy, and 2 (7%) reviews focused on nerve-biased manual therapy. Twenty-nine (97%) reviews reported on pressure pain threshold (PPT). Meta-analytic results demonstrated conflicting evidence that manual therapy results in greater hypoalgesic effects compared to other interventions or controls.

CONCLUSION

Our overview of QST effects, which has relevance to mechanisms underlying hypoalgesia, shows conflicting evidence from mostly low to critically low systematic reviews.

Does manual therapy meaningfully change quantitative sensory testing and patient reported outcome measures in patients with musculoskeletal impairments related to the spine?: A 'trustworthy' systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a 'trustworthy' systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis on the potential mechanisms of manual therapy used to treat spinal impairments.

DESIGN

SR with meta-analysis.

LITERATURE SEARCH

Articles published between January 2010 and October 2022 from CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, and PEDro.

METHODS

This SR included English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving manual therapy to treat spinal impairments in adults. The primary outcome was pressure pain thresholds (PPTs). To synthesize RCTs with high confidence in estimated effects using the GRADE, RCTs with questionable prospective, external, and internal validity, and high risk of bias (RoB) were excluded.

RESULTS

Following title and abstract screening, 89 full-text RCTs were reviewed. Twenty-two studies included the criteria of interest. Sixteen were not prospectively registered, two contained discussion/conclusions judged to be inconsistent with the registry, and one was rated as having a high RoB. Three studies met the inclusion criteria; heterogeneous interventions and locations for PPT testing prevented synthesis into practice recommendations. The two studies with high confidence in estimated effects had small effect sizes, and one study had confidence intervals that crossed zero for the outcome measures of interest.

DISCUSSION

Standardized PPT testing, as a potential measure of centrally mediated pain, could provide clues regarding the mechanisms of manual therapy or help identify/refine research questions.

CONCLUSION

High-quality RCTs could not be synthesized into strong conclusions secondary to the dissimilarity in research designs. Future research regarding quantitative sensory testing should develop RCTs with high confidence in estimated effects that can be translated into strong recommendations.

Conditioned Pain Modulation and Temporal Summation of Pain in Patients With Traumatic and Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In patients with neck pain, it is unclear whether pain inhibition and facilitation endogenous pain mechanisms are altered. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to improve their understanding by assessing conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) in patients with neck pain associated with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) or of a nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) nature compared to pain-free controls. Very low certainty evidence suggests: impaired CPM when assessed remotely in chronic WAD patients (n = 7, 230 patients and 204 controls, standardized mean differences (SMD) = -.47 [-.89 to -.04]; P = .04) but not locally (n = 6, 155 patients and 150 controls; SMD = -.34 [-.68 to .01]; P = .05), impaired CPM in chronic NSNP patients when assessed locally (n = 5, 223 patients and 162 controls; SMD = -.55 [-1.04 to -.06]; P = .04) but not remotely (n = 3, 72 patients and 66 controls; SMD = -.33 [-.92 to .25]; P = .13), TSP not facilitated in either chronic WAD (local TSP: n = 4, 90 patients and 87 controls; SMD = .68 [-.62 to 1.99]) (remote TSP: n = 8, 254 patients and 214 controls; SMD = .18 [-.12 to .48]) or chronic NSNP (local TSP: n = 2, 139 patients and 92 controls; SMD = .21 [-1.00 to 1.41]), (remote TSP: n = 3; 91 patients and 352 controls; SMD = .60 [-1.33 to 2.52]). The evidence is very uncertain whether CPM is impaired and TSP facilitated in patients with WAD and NSNP. PERSPECTIVE: This review and meta-analysis present the current evidence on CPM and TSP in patients with WAD and NSNP. Standardization of measurement methodology is needed to draw clear conclusions. Subsequently, future studies should investigate the clinical relevance of these measurements as prognostic variables or predictors of treatment success.

Personalized assessment and management of non-specific low back pain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Low back pain (LBP), and in particular non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), which accounts for approximately 90% of LBP, is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. In clinical trials, LBP is often poorly categorized into 'specific' versus 'non-specific' and 'acute' versus 'chronic' pain. However, a better understanding of the underlying pain mechanisms might improve study results and reduce the number of NSLBP patients.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

Narrative review.

RESULTS

NSLBP is a multi-dimensional, biopsychosocial condition that requires all contributing dimensions to be assessed and prioritized. Thereby, the assessment of the contribution of nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain mechanisms forms the basis for personalized management. In addition, psychosocial (e.g. anxiety, catastrophizing) and contextual factors (e.g. work situation) as well as comorbidities need to be assessed and individually weighted. Personalized treatment of NSLBP further requires individually choosing treatment modalities, for example, exercising, patient education, cognitive-behavioural advice, pharmacotherapy, as well as tailoring treatment within these modalities, for example, the delivery of tailored psychological interventions or exercise programs. As the main pain mechanism and psychosocial factors may vary over time, re-assessment is necessary and treatment success should ideally be assessed quantitatively and qualitatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of the main contributing pain mechanism and the integration of the patients' view on their condition, including beliefs, preferences, concerns and expectations, are key in the personalized clinical management of NSLBP. In research, particular importance should be placed on accurate characterization of patients and on including outcomes relevant to the individual patient.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Here, a comprehensive review of the challenges associated with the diagnostic label 'non-specific low back pain' is given. It outlines what is lacking in current treatment guidelines and it is summarized what is currently known with respect to individual phenotyping. It becomes clear that more research on clinically meaningful subgroups is needed to best tailor treatment approaches.

Adverse Events of the Long-Term Use of Opioids for Chronic Non-cancer Pain: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

The long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) has drawn more attention and debate. Although opioids are frequently used to treat chronic pain, their effectiveness and safety over extended periods are still unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of what is currently known about the adverse events of long-term use of opioids in CNCP. It also delivers patient-centered strategies designed to mitigate these risks.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included CNCP, pain pathophysiology, opioid pharmacodynamics, opioid prescribing trends, guidelines for opioid use, and opioid side effects.  Results: Our review highlights that while opioids may provide short-term relief from CNCP, their effectiveness diminishes over time due to the development of opioid tolerance. This tolerance often leads to increased dosages, which can subsequently result in opioid dependence. Additionally, long-term opioid therapy is associated with a spectrum of adverse effects, including constipation, drowsiness, respiratory depression, and potential for drug interactions. Furthermore, our review indicates that alternative pain management strategies play a crucial role in controlling CNCP. They offer significant benefits with fewer adverse events. These strategies include non-opioid medications, physical therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), various interventional procedures, injection therapy, and acupuncture.

CONCLUSION

Using opioids to manage CNCP presents several challenges. Given these challenges, alternative treatments are being considered as viable options. Moreover, it is crucial to customize treatment plans to align with the patients' specific health requirements, existing conditions, and potential risks to ensure the best possible outcomes.

Changes in serum levels of pain mediators in hemiplegic shoulder pain

OBJECTIVE

To provide a new insight into the diagnosis and treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) by investigating changes in serum pain mediators.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS

Shoulder pain group (n = 34) and control group (n = 21).

METHODS

Pain-free shoulder mobility, anxiety status, depression status, and shoulder pain were measured by passive range of motion (PROM), self-rating anxiety scale, self-rating depression scale (SDS), and visual analog scale, respectively. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to test the serum pain mediators, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, nerve growth factor (NGF), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), substance P (SP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), bradykinin (BK), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA).

RESULTS

Shoulder pain group pain-free PROM significantly lower than control (p < .01), and SDS index score of shoulder pain group was significantly higher than control (p < .05). The rate of spasticity in the flexor elbow muscles is higher in shoulder pain group (p < .01). CGRP, IL-10, and IL-2 were significantly upregulated in shoulder pain group compared with control (p < .01), whereas NGF, TNF-α, IL-6, 5-HT, PGE2, SP, LPA, BK, and IL-1β were significantly decreased (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HSP have a higher risk of joint mobility disorders and depression; spasticity may be an important factor in the development of shoulder pain; CGRP is thought to be the major pain mediator in HSP, and HSP may not be inflammatory.

Chronic pain in female breast cancer survivors - prevalence, characteristics and contributing factors: a cross-sectional pilot study

BACKGROUND

While the global incidence of breast cancer is increasing, there is also an increase in the numbers of breast cancer survivors and in survival duration, as early detection programs are implemented, and treatments are optimized. Breast cancer survivors in several countries commonly struggle with a range of symptoms (fatigue, insomnia, depression) with 25-80% of survivors suffering from chronic pain. There is a paucity of literature reporting on breast cancer survivors in South Africa. In this pilot study we aimed to determine the prevalence of chronic pain in female breast cancer survivors attending the breast oncology clinic.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted of all breast cancer survivors attending the Groote Schuur Hospital Breast Unit during one month in 2019. 44 female breast cancer survivors (median age 60.5y) completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale and measures for neuropathic pain (DN4), health related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5d-3 L), physical activity (IPAQ), depression and anxiety (PHQ4), and screening questions to evaluate sleep, happiness and perceived discrimination in the language of their choice.

RESULTS

The prevalence of chronic pain (pain on most days for more than three months) was 59% (95%CI 44-72), a significantly higher number than the 18,3% prevalence of chronic pain reported by South African adults. 39% of the women were classified as having neuropathic pain. The median pain severity score was 3.75 (IQR = 2.75-5) and the median pain interference with function score was 4 (IQR = 2.9-5.4). The women were experiencing pain in a median of 2 different body sites (IQR = 1-3). The women with pain were more likely to be unemployed or receiving a disability grant, had significantly worse HRQoL, and significantly worse scores for risk of depression and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study suggest that chronic pain may be a significant burden for South African breast cancer survivors. Routine screening for chronic pain in breast cancer survivors is recommended with a larger study indicated to explore this issue further.

Precision management of post-COVID pain: An evidence and clinical-based approach

Background Pain after a SARS-CoV-2 acute infection (post-COVID pain) is becoming a new healthcare emergency but remains underestimated and most likely undertreated due to a lack of recognition of the phenomenon and knowledge of the underlying pain mechanisms. Evidence supporting any particular treatment approach for the management of post-COVID pain is lacking. Large variability in the patient response to any standard pain treatments is clinically observed, which has led to calls for a personalized, tailored approach to treating patients with chronic post-COVID pain (i.e. 'precision pain medicine'). Applying the global concerted action towards precision medicine to post-COVID pain could help guide clinical decision-making and aid in more effective treatments. Methods The current position paper discusses factors to be considered by clinicians for managing post-COVID pain ranging from identification of the pain phenotype to genetic consideration. Results The ability of clinicians to phenotype post-COVID pain into nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic or mixed type is suggested as the first step to better planification of a treatment programme. Further, the consideration of other factors, such as gender, comorbidities, treatments received at the acute phase of infection for onset-associated COVID-19 symptoms, factors during hospitalization or the presence of emotional disturbances should be implemented into a treatment programme. Conclusions Accordingly, considering these factors, management of post-COVID pain should include multimodal pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities targeting emotional/cognitive aspects (i.e. psychological and/or coping strategies), central sensitization-associated mechanisms (i.e. pain neuroscience education), exercise programmes as well as lifestyle interventions (e.g. nutritional support and sleep management). SIGNIFICANCE: This position paper presents an evidence-based clinical reasoning approach for precision management of post-COVID pain.

[Nociplastic pain in research and practice : Overview of biopsychosocial principles, possibilities and difficulties]

Traditionally, two mechanistic pain categories were distinguished: nociceptive and neuropathic pain. After the definitions of these two mechanistic descriptors were refined more precisely in the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) taxonomy in 2011, a large group of patients remained whose pain could not be assigned to either of the two categories. Nociplastic pain was therefore proposed as a third mechanistic descriptor in 2016. This review article presents the current state of the integration of nociplastic pain into research and clinical practice. In particular, the possibilities and difficulties of applying this concept are addressed from a human and animal experimental research perspective.

Physical therapist perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment in the musculoskeletal setting: a survey analysis

BACKGROUND

A mechanism-based approach to the evaluation and management of pain has been suggested across disciplines in contemporary research. However, the translation of pain mechanism assessment strategies in research to clinical practice is unclear. This study sought to explore perceptions and use of clinical pain mechanism assessment by physical therapists managing musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

This was an electronic cross-sectional survey. After initial development, refinement, and piloting for comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance, the survey was disseminated to members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy via email listserv. Data was maintained anonymously using the online database REDCap. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's correlations for non-parametric data were analyzed for frequencies and associations across variables.

RESULTS

In total, 148 respondents completed all aspects of the survey. Respondent age ranged from 26 to 73 years, with a mean (SD) of 43.9 (12.0). Most respondents (70.8%) reported performing clinical pain mechanism assessments at least 'sometimes'. A majority (80.4%) believed clinical pain mechanism assessments are useful in guiding management strategies while 79.8% reported specifically choosing interventions to alter aberrant pain mechanisms. The most commonly used pain severity, physical examination testing and questionnaires were the numeric pain rating scale, pressure pain thresholds and pain diagrams, respectively. However, the vast majority of instruments to clinically assess pain mechanisms were performed by a small proportion of respondents (< 30%). There were no significant correlations between age, years of experience, highest earned degree, completion of advanced training or specialist certification and testing frequency.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of pain mechanisms involved in the pain experience is becoming common in research. The clinical application of pain mechanism assessment is unclear. Based on the results of this survey, physical therapists in the orthopedic setting believe pain mechanism assessment is useful, but data suggests it is infrequently performed. Additional research to uncover clinician motivation related to pain mechanism assessment is warranted.

The effect of skilled motor training on corticomotor control of back muscles in different presentations of low back pain

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has revealed differences in the motor cortex (M1) between people with and without low back pain (LBP). There is potential to reverse these changes using motor skill training, but it remains unclear whether changes can be induced in people with LBP or whether this differs between LBP presentations. This study (1) compared TMS measures of M1 (single and paired-pulse) and performance of a motor task (lumbopelvic tilting) between individuals with LBP of predominant nociceptive (n = 9) or nociplastic presentation (n = 9) and pain-free individuals (n = 16); (2) compared these measures pre- and post-training; and (3) explored correlations between TMS measures, motor performance, and clinical features. TMS measures did not differ between groups at baseline. The nociplastic group undershot the target in the motor task. Despite improved motor performance for all groups, only MEP amplitudes increased across the recruitment curve and only for the pain-free and nociplastic groups. TMS measures did not correlate with motor performance or clinical features. Some elements of motor task performance and changes in corticomotor excitability differed between LBP groups. Absence of changes in intra-cortical TMS measures suggests regions other than M1 are likely to be involved in skill learning of back muscles.

Assessment of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in chronic low back pain and potential associations with psychological factors and central sensitization symptoms: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Exercise is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain (CLBP) and is effective in reducing pain, but the mechanisms underlying its effects remain poorly understood. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) may play a role and is thought to be driven by central pain modulation mechanisms. However, EIH appears to be disrupted in many chronic pain conditions and its presence in people with CLBP remains unclear. As people suffering from chronic pain often exhibit psychological factors and central sensitization symptoms influencing pain perception, EIH might be associated with these factors.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the level of EIH between participants with and without CLBP following back and wrist exercises and to assess the associations between EIH, psychological factors, and symptoms of central sensitization (using the central sensitization inventory - CSI) in CLBP.

METHOD

Twenty-eight participants with CLBP and 23 without pain were recruited. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured at 4 sites (2 bony sites = capitate, S1|2 muscle sites = wrist flexors, lumbar erector spinae) before and after each of two exercises (wrist flexion and lumbar extension). Exercise-induced hypoalgesia was defined as percent change in PPT from pre- to post-exercise. Participants with CLBP also completed questionnaires to measure psychological factors (e.g., kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, anxiety, and self-efficacy) and symptoms of central sensitization (CSI), and correlations with EIH were calculated.

RESULTS

After wrist exercise, EIH measured at the muscle sites was lower in the CLBP group compared with the pain-free group (p = 0.047) but no differences were found at bony sites (p = 0.49). No significant differences for EIH were observed following back exercise at muscle sites (p = 0.14) or at bony sites (p = 0.65). Exercise-induced hypoalgesia was not correlated with any psychological factors or with the CSI score.

CONCLUSION

The lower EIH following wrist exercises may represent an alteration in pain modulation control in CLBP. However, psychological factors and central sensitization symptoms may not explain the differences observed.

Mechanisms of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for patients with chronic primary low back pain: protocol for a mechanistic randomised placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Identifying subgroups of patients afflicted with CLBP is a current research priority, for which a classification system based on pain mechanisms was proposed. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recommended for the management of CLBP. Yet, little data are available regarding its mechanisms of action, making it difficult to match this intervention to the patients who may benefit the most. It was suggested that SMT may influence mechanisms associated with central sensitisation. Therefore, classifying patients with CLBP according to central sensitisation mechanisms may help predict their response to SMT.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol describes a randomised placebo-controlled trial aiming to examine which variables linked to central sensitisation may help predict the clinical response to SMT in a cohort of patients with CLBP. One hundred patients with chronic primary low back pain will be randomised to receive 12 sessions of SMT or placebo SMT over a 4-week period. Pain intensity and disability will be assessed as primary outcomes after completing the 4-week treatment (primary endpoint), and at 4-week and 12-week follow-ups. Baseline values of two pain questionnaires, lumbar pressure pain thresholds, concentrations of an inflammatory cytokine and expectations of pain relief will be entered as predictors of the response to SMT in a multiple regression model. Changes in these variables after treatment will be used in a second multiple regression model. The reference values of these predictors will be measured from 50 age and sex-matched healthy controls to allow interpretation of values in patients. Mixed analyses of variance will also be conducted to compare the primary outcomes and the predictors between groups (SMT vs placebo) over time (baseline vs post-treatment).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was granted by the Fundación Jiménez Díaz Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05162924.

Biological sex influences psychological aspects of the biopsychosocial model related to chronic pain intensity and interference among South Korean patients with chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain in rheumatic diseases

Introduction

Pain is a prominent contributor to negative personal and social outcomes, including increased disability and mortality, in many rheumatic diseases. In the Biopsychosocial model of chronic pain, psychological and social factors share roles with the biology of the injury in determining each patient's pain and suffering. The current study explored factors associated with clinical pain intensity and interference among patients with chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain in rheumatic diseases.

Methods

In total, 220 patients experiencing chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain participated. Biological factors (age, biological sex, pain condition, pain duration, pain sensitivity, and comorbidity), socio-economic factors, psychological factors (pain catastrophizing and depressive symptoms), and pain intensity and interference were measured. Descriptive, multivariable linear regression and partial correlation analyses were conducted. Subgroup analysis by sex was conducted to examine differences in how different factors affect the pain experience.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 52.3 years (SD = 12.07) and ranged from 22 to 78. Average pain intensity was 3.01 (0-10 scale) and average total pain interference score was 21.07 (0-70 scale). Partial correlation found positive correlations between pain intensity and interference with depression (intensity: R = 0.224; p = 0.0011; interference: R = 0.351; p < 0.001) and pain catastrophizing (intensity: R = 0.520; p < 0.001; interference: R = 0.464; p < 0.001). In males, pain condition (β = -0.249, p = 0.032) and pain catastrophizing (R = 0.480, p < 0.001) were associated with pain intensity. In males, the simple correlation between pain intensity and depression (R = 0.519; p < 0.001) was driven by pain catastrophizing. In females, pain catastrophizing (R = 0.536, p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (R = 0.228, p = 0.0077) were independently associated with pain intensity. Age (β = -0.251, p = 0.042) and pain catastrophizing (R = 0.609, p < 0.001) were associated with pain interference in males, while depressive symptoms (R = 0.439, p < 0.001) and pain catastrophizing (R = 0.403, p < 0.001) were associated with pain interference in females. Again, in males, the simple correlation between pain interference and depression (R = 0.455; p < 0.001) was driven by pain catastrophizing.

Discussion

In this study, females were more directly affected by depressive symptoms than males, regarding pain intensity and interference. Pain catastrophizing was a significant factor influencing chronic pain for both males and females. Based on these findings, a sex-specific approach to the Biopsychosocial model should be considered in understanding and managing pain among Asians with chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain.

Clinical Assessment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain-A Framework Proposal Based on a Narrative Review of the Literature

The assessment of chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a challenge shared by several health professionals. Fragmented or incomplete assessment can cause deleterious consequences for the patient's function. The objective of this paper was to propose a framework for clinical assessment of CMP based on the current literature and following the conceptual model of the International Classification of Functioning and Health (ICF). We propose that the ICF rationale may help to guide the processes, acting as a moderator of the clinical assessment, since it changes the perspective used to obtain and interpret findings during anamnesis and physical examination. Additionally, updated specific knowledge about pain, including that of pain domains and mechanisms, along with effective patient-clinician communication may act as a mediator of CMP assessment. We conduct the readers through the steps of the clinical assessment of CMP using both the proposed moderator and mediators and present a clinical example of application. We suggest that the proposed framework may help clinicians to implement a CMP assessment based on the biopsychosocial model using a critical and updated rationale, potentially improving assessment outcomes, i.e., clinical diagnosis.