Neural mechanisms underlying the conditioned pain modulation response: a narrative review of neuroimaging studies

The role of androgens on experimental pain sensitivity: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Animal studies have shown androgens, especially testosterone, may have an analgesic effect on nociceptive behavior. However, it is unclear if this effect is present in humans. This review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and synthesize the role of androgens on experimental pain sensitivity in humans. Studies were included if they examined the (1) relationships between androgens and experimental pain sensitivity, (2) group differences in androgen or pain levels, and (3) the effect of androgen interventions on experimental pain sensitivity. After a comprehensive search, 31 papers were identified. When possible, meta-analyses were performed. Most studies examined the impact of testosterone on experimental pain, and only a few studies focused on other androgens, such as dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Overall, the current data do not support the effect of androgens on experimental pain sensitivity in adult men and women with or without chronic pain. In addition, meta-analyses of Pearson correlations did not find relationships between testosterone levels and pain ratings of heat stimulus (3 studies, n = 93, Z correlation coefficient = -0.43, confidence intervals [-1.50, 0.64]) or electrical pain thresholds (4 studies, n = 147, Z correlation coefficient = 0.24, confidence intervals [-0.10, 0.58]). Moreover, contradicting results were found in intervention studies that increased or decreased testosterone levels. Thus, it is suggested that the role of testosterone on experimental pain sensitivity may be minor, even though there is a wide heterogeneity between studies. Future studies should examine the impact of other androgens and the interaction between testosterone and other hormones on experimental pain sensitivity.

Counterirritation by pain inhibits the responsiveness to aversive loud tones: the role of state anxiety and state fear triggered in the NPU paradigm

AIM OF THE STUDY

The application of a noxious stimulus reduces the perception and responsiveness to other pain stimuli. This inhibition can be experimentally assessed with a method called 'counterirritation'. The question arises if counterirritation acts also on the perception and responsiveness to aversive but non-nociceptive stimuli (e.g., loud tones). Since aversive stimulation is often associated with state anxiety or state fear, we investigated in addition the modulatory effects of these emotions on counterirritation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

51 subjects participated in our study. We presented tones with aversive loudness (105 dB), first alone then during counterirritation (immersion of the hand in a hot water bath of 46 °C) to assess inhibition of loudness perception and responsiveness. Influences of state anxiety and state fear on counterirritation were investigated by using the Neutral-Predictable(fear)- Unpredictable(anxiety) Paradigm (NPU), which is based on classical conditioning. Loudness ratings (perception of the aversive tones) and startle reflex (defensive reaction to aversive tones) were assessed.

RESULTS

Counterirritation reduced startle reflex amplitudes, but not the loudness ratings. Although state anxiety and state fear were successfully induced, counterirritation remained unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that pain inhibits the responsiveness to aversive stimuli (loud tones). Thus, the postulate that 'pain inhibits pain' might be better changed to 'pain inhibits aversiveness'. Consequently, our findings may also question the assumption of a clear pain specificity in inhibitory action as assumed by theoretical approaches like 'conditioned pain modulation' (CPM). Furthermore, counterirritation appeared one more time resistant to the influence of negative emotions.

Expectation of analgesia increases the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants who at baseline have a non-inhibitory profile

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effect of expectation of analgesia on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in healthy participants stratified into inhibitors and non-inhibitors.

METHODS

A parallel CPM protocol was assessed on 21 women and 22 men across two sessions: baseline and expectation of analgesia, which was induced by a standardized audiovisual suggestion. The CPM assessment involved two different test stimuli (TS): mechanically controlled palpation and the pressure pain threshold, applied to two different regions: anterior temporalis and thenar eminence of the hand. The conditioning stimulus (CS) involved immersing the non-dominant forearm in cold water. The order of the TS and regions was randomized for each participant. The CPM protocol was performed three times, with a 1-min interval between TS/region sequences. After a 20-min rest, the CPM assessment was repeated (two blocks in total). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was computed to identify inhibitors (inhibitory responses) and non-inhibitors (including non-inhibitors and facilitatory responses). Cochran's Q, ANOVA and ANCOVA were applied to the data (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in the proportion of non-inhibitors during the expectation of analgesia session (32.6%-44.2%) when compared with the baseline session (51.2%-72.1%). The non-inhibitors exhibited a lower inhibitory CPM magnitude than the inhibitors only in block 1 of the baseline session. The expectation of analgesia resulted in an increased magnitude of the inhibitory CPM solely in non-inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Expectation of analgesia can increase the inhibitory response of the CPM beyond the measurement error in healthy participants with a baseline non-inhibitory profile.

SIGNIFICANCE

Several studies have investigated whether cognitive modulation can alter the magnitude of the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), yet some gaps remain. This study accounted for measurement error to accurately determine changes in CPM influenced by expectation of analgesia.

Pain profiles and variability in temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation in pain-free individuals and patients with low back pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia

BACKGROUND

Pain profiles (e.g. pro- and anti-nociceptive) can be developed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) but substantial variability exists. This study describes the variability in temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients, proposes cut-off values, and explores the association with clinical pain intensity.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis in which TSP and CPM were assessed using cuff algometry in pain-free subjects (n = 69), and patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP, n = 267), osteoarthritis (n = 134), and fibromyalgia (n = 101). Using TSP and CPM from the pain-free subjects as a reference, four distinct pain profiles TSP (low/high) and CPM (low/high) were created, and differences in clinical pain between pain profiles were explored.

RESULTS

Individual data revealed large inter-person variability. High TSP and low CPM were found in fibromyalgia (p < 0.01) and osteoarthritis (p < 0.01) but not cLBP when compared to pain-free subjects. The proportion of patients classified into the distinct pain profiles was significantly different (p < 0.001) with the largest proportion in the high TSP and low CPM group in fibromyalgia (52.5%) and osteoarthritis (41.4%). Clinical pain was not significantly different comparing the pain profiles, and no significant correlations were observed between clinical pain and TSP or CPM.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated substantial inter-person variability in TSP and CPM in patients with different chronic pain conditions and pain-free subjects. The proportion of patients with a pro-nociceptive profile appears larger in fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis, but we found no association to clinical pain.

SIGNIFICANT STATEMENT

This analysis shows that there is variability when assessing TSP and CPM in both pain-free subjects and patients with chronic pain. A cut-off for determining when a person is pain-sensitive is proposed, and data based on this cut-off approach suggest that significantly more patients with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia are pain-sensitive (i.e. higher TSP and lower CPM) compared to pain-free subjects. This analysis does not find an association between pain sensitivity and clinical pain.

Intra-somatosensory cortical circuits mediating pain-induced analgesia

Pain in one part of the body profoundly diminishes the sensation of pain in other parts of the body in humans. Here, we found that pain-related behaviors in hindpaw are inhibited by noxious stimuli from diverse body regions in mice. Using activity-dependent cell labeling in male FosTRAP2 mice, we captured a neuronal ensemble in the layers 2-4 of secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) that was activated during pain at diverse body regions induced analgesia. Single-cell projection analysis showed that these S2 neurons receive projections from the contralateral S2 and specifically innervate the layer 4 of primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Microendoscopic calcium imaging and chemogenetic manipulation in freely moving mice showed that this S2 → S1 feedforward inhibitory circuit mediates ipsilateral pain-induced analgesia, whereas contralateral S2 innervation of the S2 → S1 circuit mediates contralateral pain-induced analgesia. Our study defines the intra-somatosensory cortical circuits underlying "pain inhibiting pain", expanding the scope of known circuit mechanisms involved in pain relief.

Capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia differences between the trigeminal and spinal innervation

This study compared the degree of secondary hyperalgesia and somatosensory threshold changes induced by topical capsaicin between spinal and trigeminal innervation. This crossover clinical trial included 40 healthy individuals in which 0.25 g of 1% capsaicin cream was randomly applied for 45 minutes to a circular area of 2 cm2 to the skin covering the masseter muscle and forearm in 2 different sessions, separated by at least 24 hours and no more than 72 hours (washout period). The main outcome variables were the area of allodynia and pinprick hyperalgesia, as well as electrical and mechanical pain thresholds within the area of pinprick hyperalgesia. Mixed ANOVA models and McNemar tests were applied to the data (p = 0.050). The occurrence of allodynia and pinprick hyperalgesia was higher in the forearm than in the masseter (p < 0.050). Additionally, the areas of pinprick hyperalgesia and allodynia were larger in the forearm compared to the masseter (p < 0.050). The electrical and mechanical pain thresholds demonstrated a loss of somatosensory function following capsaicin application to the masseter (p < 0.050). However, no significant somatosensory threshold changes were observed at the forearm after capsaicin (p > 0.050). In conclusion, these findings indicate potential differences compatible with central sensitization related to secondary hyperalgesia between trigeminal and spinal innervation.

How Does Conditioned Pain Modulation Influence Motor Imagery Processes in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome? A Cross-Sectional Study Secondary Analysis

Background/Objectives: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a multifactorial pain syndrome not only characterized by widespread pain as the primary symptom but also accompanied by physical, psychological, and cognitive manifestations. Impairments in conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are common in this population; however, there is significant heterogeneity in the CPM response among women with FMS. The Left/Right Judgment Task (LRJT) is a validated method for studying motor imagery in chronic pain patients. Previous scientific evidence has not yet thoroughly investigated the relationship between CPM alterations and motor imagery processes in FMS patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CPM and motor imagery. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study. Pain intensity (NPRS), disability (FIQ), mechanical hyperalgesia (PPT), descending pain modulation (CPM), and laterality discrimination (LRJT) were assessed in 30 women diagnosed with FMS. Participants were divided into two groups, responder and non-responder, according to their response to the CPM test. Results: Findings showed that the FMS subgroup of non-responders to CPM, performed worse in motor imagery processes (LRJT). Additionally, older age and higher mechanical hyperalgesia were also associated with poorer functioning of the inhibitory system. Conclusions: Women with FMS who are non-responders to CPM exhibit a reduced ability to perform motor imagery processes. Additionally, the non-responder group shown significant differences, such as older age and greater initial mechanical hyperalgesia compared to the responder group.

The influence of expectations and attention on conditioned pain modulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a psychophysical experimental measure of endogenous pain inhibition in humans. Within this paradigm, one noxious stimulus, the conditioning stimulus (CS), reduces the pain perception from another heterotopic noxious stimulus, the test stimulus (TS). Cognitive processes are known to influence pain perception and might impact the underlying mechanisms of CPM. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the existing scientific literature addressing the influence of cognitive factors, namely, expectations and attention on CPM. Four electronic databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed according to two modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scales and the GRADE approach, respectively. Twenty-four articles were included. Qualitative analysis showed more efficient CPM when pain relief is expected, and an association between intrinsic attention to pain and reduced CPM. Although the evidence is not unanimous, meta-analyses showed that CPM is more efficient when attention is directed towards the CS versus the TS, and is not influenced by distraction. In conclusion, while CPM seems robust to attentional distraction, expectations and attentional focus appear to influence CPM. However, the evidence is limited and conflicting and warrants further study in order to prevent cognitive confounding and enhance mechanistic understanding.

Endogenous pain modulation after sleep restriction in migraine: a blinded crossover study

BACKGROUND

Patients with migraine are vulnerable to insufficient sleep, but the impact of sleep restriction is largely unknown. In addition, the importance of sleep may be different in patients with migraine who mostly have attack onsets during sleep, so called sleep-related migraine, compared to patients with non-sleep-related migraine. In this study we investigate the effect of sleep restriction on endogenous pain modulation in patients with migraine and healthy controls. We also compared the effect of sleep restriction in sleep-related and in non-sleep-related migraine.

METHODS

Measurements were conducted in 39 patients with migraine between attacks and 31 controls, once after habitual sleep and once after two consecutive nights of partial sleep restriction. There were 29 and 10 patients with non-sleep-related and sleep-related migraine respectively. Test stimulus was 2-min tonic noxious heat to the left volar forearm. Temporal summation was calculated as the regression coefficient for rated pain in the late part of this 2-min stimulation. Conditioning stimulus was right hand-immersion in 7 °C water. Conditioned pain modulation was defined as the difference in rated pain with and without the conditioning stimulus and was calculated for temporal summation and mean rated pain for the test stimulus. The effect of sleep restriction on temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation was compared in migraine subjects and controls using two-level models with recordings nested in subjects.

RESULTS

Conditioned pain modulation for temporal summation of heat pain tended to be reduced after sleep restriction in patients with migraine compared to controls (p = 0.060) and, in an exploratory analysis, was reduced more after sleep restriction in sleep-related than in non-sleep-related migraine (p = 0.017). No other differences between groups after sleep restriction were found for temporal summation or conditioned pain modulation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with migraine may have a subtly altered endogenous pain modulation system. Sleep restriction may have an increased pronociceptive effect on this system, suggesting a mechanism for vulnerability to insufficient sleep in migraine. This effect seems to be larger in sleep-related migraine than in non-sleep-related migraine.

CPM-Related Mechanisms Could Play a Key Role in the Effects on Pain Sensitivity Induced by Manual Therapy: Three Crossover Trials Investigating the Effects of Manual Pressure

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess whether pain-inducing manual pressure (PIMP) leads to effects on pressure pain threshold (PPT) mediated by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and whether these effects are influenced by the intensity and repetition of the stimulus. Additionally, the influence of psychological factors and physical activity on the response to PIMP was explored. Methods: A total of 72 pain-free students were randomly assigned to three crossover trials. Trial 1 compared the effects of PIMP with the cold pressor task and pain-inducing electrostimulation. Trial 2 compared the effects of manual pressure that elicited moderate pain, mild pain, and no pain. Trial 3 compared a single PIMP stimulation with four stimuli applied at the same site or at different sites. Results: PIMP produced a lower increase in PPT than cold pressor task and no difference with electrostimulation. Manual pressure that caused moderate pain led to a greater increase in PPT compared to mild pain and pain-free application. Repetition of PIMP stimulus, whether at the same or different sites, did not significantly increase PPT compared to a single stimulation. No association with psychological factors or physical activity was found. Conclusions: PIMP produces an increase in PPT, suggesting the involvement of CPM-related mechanisms.

Hyperalgesia, Increased Temporal Summation and Impaired Inhibitory Mechanisms in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headache: An Observational Study

Cluster Headache (CH) is a primary headache that causes severe pain. Some evidence suggests that central mechanisms might be involved. The objective of this study was (1) to compare hyperalgesia signs, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation among episodic (ECH) and chronic CH (CCH) patients and controls, (2) to compare these factors between sides in the patient groups and (3) to compare the psychophysical variables between the groups. This cross-sectional study included 71 subjects divided into three groups (ECH, CCH and controls). Pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation and other psychosocial variables were measured. The ANOVA showed differences for all physical outcome measures (p < 0.05). Bonferroni post hoc analyses showed differences when comparing the patient groups with the healthy subjects (p < 0.05), with large effect sizes (d > 0.8). No differences between the patient groups were found for almost all the variables (p > 0.05). Significant differences for all the variables were detected when comparing the symptomatic and non-symptomatic sides in both the ECH and CCH groups (p < 0.05). The ECH and CCH groups showed mechanical hyperalgesia, increased temporal summation and impaired inhibitory mechanisms compared to the controls. Side-to-side differences were also detected within the patient groups. Patients with CCH had poorer sleep quality and quality of life than the controls.

Insomnia is associated with symptoms of central sensitization in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders

BACKGROUND

Central sensitization (CS) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) are both associated with insomnia. Therefore, the authors aimed to investigate whether insomnia was associated with more symptoms of CS in patients with TMD.

METHODS

In 82 volunteers with TMD, insomnia was clinically assessed, allowing sample stratification according to its presence. The Central Sensitization Inventory questionnaire was self-applied to assess the clinical symptoms of CS.

RESULTS

Participants with insomnia had significantly higher mean (SD) scores of CS according to the Central Sensitization Inventory than participants without insomnia (43.10 [12.57] vs 26.59 [13.66]; P = < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Insomnia was associated with higher scores of CS symptoms in patients with TMD.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Insomnia influences TMD as well as its relationship with CS, and, therefore, it is critical to the clinical management of TMD.

Harnessing the conditioned pain modulation response in migraine diagnosis, outcome prediction, and treatment-A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To present the potential use and relevance of the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) response to migraine diagnosis, outcome prediction, and treatment.

BACKGROUND

The CPM response is a widely used laboratory test to examine inhibitory pain modulation capabilities.

METHODS

This narrative review summarizes and synthesizes the findings on the CPM response in patients with migraine.

RESULTS

For diagnosis, we summarized the studies comparing CPM responses between patients with migraine and individuals without migraine or with other headache syndromes, as well as between patients with subtypes of migraine. For prediction, we summarized the studies utilizing the CPM response to predict migraine outcome, such as response to interventions. For treatment, we described a device that utilizes the CPM response for acute and preventative migraine treatment. In addition, we suggest the requirements needed for the CPM response to be used for migraine diagnosis, outcome prediction, and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more research is needed, the CPM response could be a useful tool for improving migraine management.