Anxiety Symptoms After Orthopedic Injury: A Systematic Review

Evaluating patient-reported health outcome profiles of lower limb orthosis users

PURPOSE

To construct self-reported health outcomes profiles of lower limb orthosis users and compare scores to a normative sample representative of the United States general population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey, which included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Profile v2.0 (PROMIS-29), was administered to a national sample of adult lower limb orthosis users who had at least 6 months of experience using their orthosis.

RESULTS

Relative to the U.S. general population, the 1,036 study participants report significantly worse anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities (all p < 0.001). Differences in pain interference, physical function, and ability to participate in social roles and activities were all greater than 5 points. Subgroup analyses indicate those who also use assistive devices (e.g. canes, walkers) in addition to their orthoses generally have worse scores across multiple PROMIS domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study indicate lower limb orthosis users, as a group, report significantly worse health outcomes than the general population. These findings highlight health constructs that may be important to assess in clinical care and research and provide references scores for this patient population.

Effectiveness of interventions for psychological distress following traumatic injury: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury poses significant physical and psychological challenges, often resulting in psychological distress, encompassing symptoms of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress. Despite the recognised need for psychological care in trauma rehabilitation, there is limited empirical evidence of effective interventions tailored specifically for individuals with traumatic injuries, leading to a practice-evidence gap.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological and behavioural interventions for reducing psychological distress in adults following traumatic injury.

METHODS

This systematic review followed a published protocol (CRD4202342946) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews reporting items. Peer-reviewed studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL and Embase databases. Eligible studies involved adults aged 18 and older who had experienced physical trauma requiring immediate medical attention. Studies involving participants with neurological injuries and/or military personnel were not included. Both English- and non-English-language articles were considered. Effect direction was employed as the method of synthesis and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC 9) nine-item assessment tool.

RESULTS

A total of six studies met the review eligibility criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity across the interventions in terms of their nature, timing and duration, however all interventions were delivered within 3-months post-injury. Most studies reported positive intervention effects, with no adverse effects reported. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) was the most reported intervention across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The review findings highlight the preliminary evidence supporting CBT as a viable option for reducing psychological distress following traumatic injury. However, this may be explained by the dominance of CBT in the literature due to its structured nature, availability and suitability for research, potentially limiting the visibility of alternative therapeutic approaches. Further, these findings are constrained by study limitations, including small sample sizes, heterogeneity of injury types and severity, reliance on self-reported outcomes, and limited follow-up data. Future research should aim to include longitudinal follow-up assessments and explore alternative therapeutic approaches to contribute to our understanding of meaningful trauma rehabilitation methods.

Frailty across the adult age spectrum and its effects on outcomes: Experience from a level 1 trauma centre

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that frailty may be a more reliable measure than age to predict outcomes following trauma. Frailty leads to prolonged hospitalisation and increased burden on the hospital system in older patients. The aim of this study is to review the prevalence of frailty in our trauma patients and the association of frailty with hospital-based and twelve-month outcomes.

METHODS

Patient demographics, discharge destination, hospital length of stay (LOS), and functional status at 12 months were reviewed. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (score <4 non frail, 4 vulnerable, >4 frail). Factors associated with frailty and outcomes including discharge destination (home or inpatient care) and LOS (p value <0.2) were included in multivariate models.

RESULTS

There were 1230 patients admitted to the trauma ward between November 2020-August 2021 who had linked registry data. Of these, 217 (17.6 %) were deemed frail with 131 (10.7 %) being vulnerable. In the group over 65 years, 38.6 % were frail and 16.1 % were vulnerable. Accounting for confounding factors (including age), being frail was associated with discharge to further inpatient care (AOR 4.82 (3.02 - 7.68), p value <0.001). At 12 months post injury, the mortality rate of patients with frailty was 28 %, compared to 2 % for the rest of the population and patients reported significantly more problems with undertaking daily tasks such as mobility and self-care.

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for confounding factors, frailty is associated with nearly five times the increase in odds of a discharge to further inpatient care. Long term outcomes are also significantly poorer for patients with frailty. Identifying frailty on admission may help outcomes by targeting this patient group and optimising healthcare resource usage.

Recovery of Comfort and Capability After Upper Extremity Fracture Is Predominantly Associated With Mindset: A Longitudinal Cohort From the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative influence of mindset and fracture severity on 9-month recovery trajectories of pain and capability after upper extremity fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

Secondary use of longitudinal data.

SETTING

Single Level-1 trauma center in Oxford, United Kingdom.

PATIENT SELECTION

English-speaking adults with isolated proximal humerus, elbow, or distal radius fracture managed operatively or nonoperatively were included, and those with multiple fractures or cognitive deficit were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Incapability (Quick-DASH) and pain intensity (11-point rating scale) were measured at baseline, 2-4 weeks, and 6-9 months after injury. Cluster analysis was used to identify statistical groupings of mindset (PROMIS Depression and Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) and fracture severity (low/moderate/high based on OTA/AO classification). The recovery trajectories of incapability and pain intensity for each mindset grouping were assessed, accounting for various fracture-related aspects.

RESULTS

Among 703 included patients (age 59 ± 21 years, 66% women, 16% high-energy injury), 4 statistical groupings with escalating levels of distress and unhelpful thoughts were identified (fracture severity was omitted considering it had no differentiating effect). Groups with less healthy mindset had a worse baseline incapability (group 2: β = 4.1, 3: β = 7.5, and 4: β = 17) and pain intensity (group 3: β = 0.70 and 4: β = 1.4) (P < 0.01). Higher fracture severity (β = 4.5), high-energy injury (β = 4.0), and nerve palsy (β = 8.1) were associated with worse baseline incapability (P < 0.01), and high-energy injury (β = 0.62) and nerve palsy (β = 0.76) with worse baseline pain intensity (P < 0.01). Groups 3 and 4 had a prolonged rate of recovery of incapability (β = 1.3, β = 7.0) and pain intensity (β = 0.19, β = 1.1) (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher levels of unhelpful thinking and feelings of distress regarding symptoms experienced worse recovery of pain and incapability, with a higher effect size than fracture location, fracture severity, high-energy injury, and nerve palsy. These findings underline the importance of anticipating and addressing mental health concerns during recovery from injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correlation between psychological status, revised Müller AO classification and patient-reported outcomes: a prospective cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

The impact of psychological status on clinical outcomes is valued in several medical conditions, but rare attention is given to it in orthopedic trauma. We aimed to assess the correlation between psychological status, fracture severity and patient-reported outcomes in fractured patients needing urgency surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively followed 139 consecutive patients undergoing urgency surgical treatment of a lower/upper limb fracture. Before surgery, all patients were divided into grades of fracture severity according to the Revised AO Müller Classification (AO grades). On the 15th and the 120th days after surgery, all patients underwent a psychological status assessment through the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS), in addition to a pain evaluation through VAS. One year after surgery, patient-reported outcomes were obtained by using specific scales depending on the site of fracture.

RESULTS

AO grades and VAS scores were significantly correlated to scores at HADS-A (anxiety component) and HADS-D (depression component), both on the 15th and the 120th. Patients presenting persistent HADS-A and HADS-D scores equal or greater than 8 points had a risk of more than 2.5 or 2.0 times of experiencing unsatisfactory surgical outcomes, respectively [HADS-A: RR = 2.8 (95% CI: 2.2-3.5)] [HADS-D: RR = 2.2 (95% CI: 1.7-3.1)]. AO grade C and the persistency of significant symptoms of anxiety or depression were independent predictors of unsatisfactory patient-reported outcomes (OR: 1.7, p = 0.03 // OR: 2.9, p < 0.01). Female gender, age, and BMI did not present any statistically significant utility in predicting unsatisfactory patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In fractured patients needing urgency surgical treatment, the risk of presenting unsatisfactory outcomes is more than twice as high in patients that present significant persistent changes in psychological status. Changes in psychological status are more frequent in patients presenting more severe pain and more severe fractures. AO grades and HADS scores are independent predictors of unsatisfactory outcomes in these patients.

Health status after periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures

Aims

Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are a major complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Health status after PFF is not specifically investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the health status pattern over two years after sustaining a PFF.

Methods

A cohort of patients with PFF after THA was derived from the Brabant Injury Outcomes Surveillance (BIOS) study. The BIOS study, a prospective, observational, multicentre follow-up cohort study, was conducted to obtain data by questionnaires pre-injury and at one week, and one, three, six, 12, and 24 months after trauma. Primary outcome measures were the EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), the Health Utility Index 2 (HUI2), and the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3). Secondary outcome measures were general measurements such as duration of hospital stay and mortality.

Results

A total of 70 patients with a PFF were included. EQ-5D utility scores were significantly lower on all timepoints except at six months' follow-up compared to pre-injury. EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) scores at one month's follow-up were significantly lower compared to pre-injury. The percentage of reported problems at two years was higher for all dimensions except anxiety/depression when compared to pre-injury. The mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.26 higher in males compared to females (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.42; p = 0.003). The mean EQ-VAS score for males was 8.9 points higher when compared to females over all timepoints (95% CI 1.2 to 16.7; p = 0.027). Mortality was 10% after two years' follow-up.

Conclusion

PFF patients are a frail population with substantial functional impairment at baseline. Post-injury, they have a significant and clinically relevant lower health status two years after trauma when compared to pre-injury. Health status improves the most between one and three months after injury. Two years after PFF, more patients experience problems in mobility, self-care, usual activities, and pain/discomfort than pre-injury.

Postconcussive Symptoms After Early Childhood Concussion

Importance

Research on postconcussive symptoms (PCS) following early childhood concussion has been hindered by a lack of measures suitable for this age group, resulting in a limited understanding of their evolution in young children.

Objective

To document PCS in the first 3 months after early childhood concussion using a developmentally appropriate measure.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data collected at 3 Canadian and 1 US urban pediatric emergency departments (EDs) and 8 Canadian daycares from December 2018 to December 2022 as part of the Kids' Outcomes and Long-Term Abilities (KOALA) project, a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study. Participants included children aged 6 to 72 months with early childhood concussion or orthopedic injury (OI) or uninjured children from the community to serve as controls. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to January 2024.

Exposure

Concussion sustained between ages 6 and 72 months.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were cognitive, physical, behavioral and total PCS assessed prior to injury (retrospectively), acutely (within 48 hours), and at 10 days, 1 month, and 3 months after injury or recruitment through caregiver observations using the Report of Early Childhood Traumatic Injury Observations & Symptoms inventory. Group comparisons were analyzed using ordinal regression models.

Results

The study included 303 children (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [20.2] months; 152 [50.2%] male). Of these, 174 children had a concussion (mean [SD] age,  33.3 [19.9] months), 60 children had an OI (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [19.8] months) and 69 children were uninjured controls (mean [SD] age, 39.7 [20.8] months). No meaningful differences were found between the concussion and comparison groups in retrospective preinjury PCS. Significant group differences were found for total PCS at the initial ED visit (concussion vs OI: odds ratio [OR], 4.33 [95% CI, 2.44-7.69]; concussion vs control: OR, 7.28 [95% CI, 3.80-13.93]), 10 days (concussion vs OI: OR, 4.44 [95% CI, 2.17-9.06]; concussion vs control: OR, 5.94 [95% CI, 3.22-10.94]), 1 month (concussion vs OI: OR, 2.70 [95% CI, 1.56-4.68]; concussion vs control: OR, 4.32 [95% CI, 2.36-7.92]), and 3 months (concussion vs OI: OR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.30-5.25]; concussion vs control: OR, 2.40 [95% CI, 1.36-4.24]). Significant group differences were also found for domain-level scores (cognitive, physical, behavioral) at various time points.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this early childhood cohort study, concussion was associated with more PCS than OIs or typical development up to 3 months after injury. Given the limited verbal and cognitive abilities typical of early childhood, using developmentally appropriate manifestations and behaviors is a valuable way of tracking PCS and could aid in concussion diagnosis in young children.

Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder following upper versus lower extremity fractures

INTRODUCTION

Orthopaedic trauma has been linked to major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Post-injury rates of psychiatric diagnoses and their relationship to various injury characteristics are not well characterized. We aimed to determine the association between orthopaedic trauma and MDD, GAD, and PTSD diagnoses at 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

A national insurance claims database was used to create upper extremity fracture (UEF) and lower extremity fracture (LEF) cohorts, with further stratification by isolated versus multiple fractures. Patient undergoing elective upper or lower extremity orthopaedic procedures served as controls. Rates of post-injury psychiatric diagnoses were calculated. Univariate logistic regression was conducted after matching in a 1:1 ratio based on relevant comorbidities such as psychiatric history. All significant variables were included in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 308,578 UEF patients and 360,510 LEF patients were identified. Within the UEF cohort, the diagnosis rates following either isolated or multiple fractures were identified: MDD (25% to 30%), GAD (10% to 11%), and PTSD (4%). LEF cohort rates were as follows: MDD (30% to 38%), GAD (11% to 14%), and PTSD (4% to 7%). Compared to non-injured controls, both the UEF and LEF cohorts were associated with higher rates of all psychiatric diagnoses. In comparing UEF and LEF cohorts, isolated UEF was associated with MDD, GAD, and PTSD; however, multiple UEF was associated with MDD and GAD, whereas multiple LEF was associated with PTSD.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatric pathology is prevalent following orthopaedic trauma. Even after controlling for psychiatric history, orthopaedic trauma is independently associated with post-injury psychiatric diagnoses and may be more predictive of PTSD and GAD than of MDD. Upper extremity fractures may portend higher psychiatric risk. With negative stigma surrounding mental health and the early role of orthopaedic surgeons in providing care, it is imperative to normalize psychiatric care with patients and discuss warning symptoms that may indicate the onset of psychiatric disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, Level III.

The impacts of anxiety and depression on outcomes in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a narrative review

Introduction

The impact of anxiety and depression on outcomes in orthopaedic trauma surgery is a topic of growing research interest.

Patients and methods

Orthopaedic trauma patients often experience high rates of psychiatric disorders, with anxiety and depression being the most prevalent. Mental health disorders have been shown to increase the risk of negative surgical outcomes and morbidity. This narrative review seeks to summarize the current literature surrounding the impacts of anxiety and depression on orthopaedic trauma surgery outcomes.

Discussion

There is a bidirectional relationship between chronic pain and mental health disorders, involving overlapping brain regions and neurotransmitter pathways. Anxiety and depression have been identified as predictors of negative surgical outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients. Screening tools like the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 (GAD-7), and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) can assess mental health status and help tailor interventions. Psychological distress, chronic pain, and traumatic limb amputation are factors that contribute to adverse mental health outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients. Opioid use for pain management is common in orthopaedic surgery, but it can worsen symptoms of depression and lead to dependency. Non-opioid pain management strategies may improve postoperative outcomes by reducing the impact of opioid-exacerbated depression.

Conclusion

Mental health interventions, both preoperative and postoperative, are crucial in optimizing surgical outcomes and improving patient quality of life. Multidisciplinary approaches that address both physical and mental health are recommended for orthopaedic trauma patients. Further research is needed to develop effective interventions for improving mental health outcomes in this patient population.

Chronic post-traumatic pain: rheumatological and orthopedic aspects

Trauma causes a complex local and systemic reaction of the macroorganism, the consequences of which can be various functional, neurological and psychoemotional disorders. One of the most painful complications of injuries of the musculoskeletal system is chronic post-traumatic pain (CPTP), which occurs, depending on the severity of the damage, in 10–50% of cases. The pathogenesis of this syndrome is multifactorial and includes the development of chronic inflammation, degenerative changes (fibrosis, angiogenesis, heterotopic ossification), pathology of the muscular and nervous systems, neuroplastic changes leading to the development of central sensitization, as well as depression, anxiety and catastrophization. Risk factors for CPTP should be considered the severity of injury, comorbid diseases and conditions (in particular, obesity), stress and serious trauma-related experiences (within the framework of post-traumatic stress disorder), the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and chronic tendopathy, genetic predisposition, deficiencies in treatment and rehabilitation in the early period after injury. To date, there is no clear system of prevention and treatment of CPTP. Considering the pathogenesis of this suffering, adequate anesthesia after injury, active anti–inflammatory therapy (including local injections of glucocorticoids), the use of hyaluronic acid, slow-acting symptomatic agents and autologous cellular preparations – platelet-riched plasma, mesenchymal stem cells, etc. are of fundamental importance. However, therapeutic and surgical methods of CPTP control require further study

Symptom cluster profiles following traumatic orthopaedic injuries

BACKGROUND

Millions of Americans experience traumatic orthopaedic injuries (TOIs) annually. Post-injury symptoms of acute stress disorder (ASD), anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep disturbance are common. Symptoms often present in clusters. Symptom cluster profiles phenotypically characterize TOI survivors' experiences with clustered symptoms. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may contribute to the biological underpinnings of symptom cluster profile membership.

METHODS

We recruited hospitalized TOI survivors within 72 hours of injury. We measured symptoms of ASD with the Acute Stress Disorder Scale and symptoms of anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep disturbance with Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms. We measured serum BDNF concentrations with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and identified rs6265 genotypes with TaqMan real-time PCR. We performed latent profile analysis to identify the symptom cluster profiles. We identified the variables associated with symptom cluster profile membership with unadjusted and adjusted multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

We identified 4 symptom cluster profiles characterized by symptom severity that we labelled Physical Symptoms Only, and Mild, Moderate, and Severe Psychological Distress. Age, self-identified Black race, resilience, and serum BDNF concentrations were associated with lower odds, and female sex with higher odds, of being in the Psychological Distress clusters. Clinical characteristics and rs6265 genotypes were not associated with symptom cluster profile membership.

CONCLUSION

TOI survivors experience distinct symptom cluster profiles. Sociodemographic characteristics and serum BDNF concentrations, not clinical characteristics, were associated with symptom cluster profile membership. These findings support comprehensive symptom screening and treatment for all TOI survivors and further evaluating BDNF as a biomarker of post-injury symptom burden.